[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 125 (Monday, June 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36721-36725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15279]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-831]
Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Final Results
and Partial Rescission of the 18th Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2011-2012
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 24, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published its preliminary results of the 2011-2012
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ This review covers 139
companies. The mandatory respondents in this review are: Hebei Golden
Bird Trading Co., Ltd. (Golden Bird) and Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial
Co. Ltd. (Xinboda). Following the Preliminary Results, we invited
interested parties to comment. Based on our analysis of the comments
received, we made changes to the margin calculations for these final
results of the antidumping duty administrative review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the 18th Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 78 FR 77653 (December 24,
2013) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed below, the Department is relying on total adverse
facts available (AFA) with respect to Golden Bird, who failed to
cooperate to the best of its ability in this administrative review. The
Department is also rescinding the review with respect to Shijiazhuang
Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. (Goodman), who was determined not to have any
bona fide sales. These determinations and the final dumping margins are
discussed below in the ``Final Results'' section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: June 30, 2014
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandon Steele, Milton Koch, and
Hilary E. Sadler, Esq., AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230;
[[Page 36722]]
telephone: (202) 482-4956, (202) 482-2584, and (202) 482-4340,
respectively.
Background
On December 24, 2013, the Department published the preliminary
results of this administrative review.\2\ In the preliminary results,
we rescinded this administrative review for two companies: Jinxiang
Jinma Fruits Vegetables Products Co., Ltd. and Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice
Co., Ltd. On January 23, 2014, Xinboda, Golden Bird, and the
petitioners requested a hearing.\3\ Between January 27, 2014, and
February 6, 2014, interested parties submitted surrogate value data for
consideration in the final results. On April 8, 2014, the petitioners
submitted new factual information along with an allegation that Golden
Bird had misreported its sales of subject merchandise to the United
States during the period of review (POR). From April 14 through April
18, 2014, the Department conducted a verification of Xinboda and its
producer Zhengzhou Dadi Garlic Industry Co., Ltd. in Shenzhen, PRC.
Between April 16, 2014, and April 28, 2014, Golden Bird responded to
the petitioners' April 8, 2014, allegations and the petitioners
provided a response to Golden Bird. On April 24, 2014, the Department
held an ex parte meeting with the petitioners to discuss their
allegations against Golden Bird. On May 7, 2014, the Department sent
Golden Bird a supplemental questionnaire seeking to confirm the
accuracy of the sales information reported by Golden Bird. On May 14,
2014, the petitioners, Golden Bird, Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd (Hejia),
and Xinboda submitted case briefs. On May 19 and May 23, 2014, the
Department held ex parte meetings with Golden Bird regarding Golden
Bird's request for an extension to file a response to the May 7, 2014,
supplemental questionnaire. On May 22, 2014, the parties submitted
their rebuttal briefs. Golden Bird responded to the May 7th
questionnaire on May 23, 2014. On May 27, 2014, the petitioners
submitted their rebuttal briefs. On June 9, 2014, the petitioners
submitted a supplemental brief regarding their allegations against
Golden Bird. On June 12, 2014, Golden Bird submitted a rebuttal brief
regarding the petitioners' allegations. On June 18, 2014, the
Department held a public hearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Id.
\3\ The petitioners in this review are the Fresh Garlic
Producers Association and its individual members: Christopher Ranch
L.L.C., The Garlic Company, Valley Garlic, and Vessey and Company,
Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products subject to this antidumping duty order are all grades
of garlic, whole or separated into constituent cloves, whether or not
peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen, provisionally preserved, or packed in
water or other neutral substance, but not prepared or preserved by the
addition of other ingredients or heat processing. Fresh garlic that are
subject to the order are currently classified under the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010, 0703.200020,
0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, and
2005.90.9700. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written product description remains
dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained
in the Issues and Decision memorandum dated concurrently with and
hereby adopted by this notice. \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
regarding ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
2011-2012 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of fresh garlic
from the People's Republic of China,'' issued concurrently with this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is dated concurrently and is
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that are raised in
the briefs and addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is in
Appendix III of this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the
Department's Central Records Unit, located in room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Application of Adverse Facts Available
After the Preliminary Results, the Department requested that Golden
Bird provide the Department with export documentation to corroborate
Golden Bird's reported volume of U.S. sales found in its Section A
response and in its U.S. sales database. Golden Bird was unable to
produce documents to corroborate its Section A submission or its U.S.
sales database. Therefore, based upon the post-preliminary results
questionnaire responses, case briefs, and rebuttal briefs, the
Department determines that it cannot rely on Golden Bird's
questionnaire responses, including Section A which contains information
with respect to Golden Bird's claim for separate rate status. As such,
for purposes of these final results, we are treating Golden Bird as
part of the PRC-wide entity. Because the PRC-wide entity, which
includes Golden Bird, submitted unreliable information and failed to
cooperate to the best of its ability, we determine the application of
AFA is appropriate.\5\ Consistent with our practice, the Department
relied upon the highest rate on the record of any segment of the
proceeding, i.e., $4.71 per kilogram. The Department also corroborated
that rate pursuant to section 776(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 16; see also
sections 776(a)(2) and 776(b) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corroboration of Secondary Information Used as Adverse Facts Available
Section 776(c) of the Act provides that, where the Department
selects from among the facts otherwise available and relies on
``secondary information,'' the Department shall, to the extent
practicable, corroborate that information from independent sources
reasonably at the Department's disposal. Secondary information is
described in the SAA as ``information derived from the petition that
gave rise to the investigation or review, the final determination
covering the subject merchandise, or any previous review under section
751 concerning the subject merchandise.'' \6\ The SAA states that
``corroborate meant to determine that the information used has
probative value.'' \7\ The Department determines that to have probative
value, information must be reliable and relevant.\8\ The SAA also
states that
[[Page 36723]]
independent sources used to corroborate such evidence may include, for
example, published price lists, official import statistics and customs
data, and information obtained from interested parties during the
particular investigation or review.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Statement of Administrative Action accompanying the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, H.R. Doc. No. 103-316, vol. 1 (1994)
(SAA) at 870.
\7\ Id.
\8\ See, e.g., Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof,
Finished and Unfinished, From Japan, and Tapered Roller Bearings
Four Inches or Less in Outside Diameter, and Components Thereof,
From Japan; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Reviews and Partial Termination of Administrative Reviews, 61 FR
57391, 57392 (November 6, 1996) (unchanged in final results).
\9\ See SAA at 870; see also Notice of Preliminary Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: High and Ultra-High Voltage
Ceramic Station Post Insulators From Japan, 68 FR 35627, 35629 (June
16, 2003) (unchanged in final determination); and Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Live Swine From
Canada, 70 FR 12181, 12183 (March 11, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be considered corroborated, information must be found both
reliable and relevant. As described in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, this AFA rate is both reliable and relevant. Therefore, we
determine that it has probative value, and is thus in accordance with
the requirement, under section 776(c) of the Act, that secondary
information be corroborated to the extent practicable.
Final Determination of No Shipments
Based upon a review of arguments made by Hejia in its case brief,
the Department determines that Hejia had no reviewable transactions of
subject merchandise during the POR.\10\ For these final results, the
Department finds that the fourteen companies listed in Appendix I,
including Hejia, had no shipments during the POR.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 17.
\11\ See Preliminary Results, 77 FR at 77654.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Withdrawal of Review Requests, Partial Rescission of the Administrative
Review, and the PRC-Wide Entity
As noted in the Preliminary Results, the Department is rescinding
this review for Jinxiang Jinma Fruits Vegetables Products Co., Ltd. and
Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. because: (1) Parties have timely
withdrawn all review requests with respect to these companies; and, (2)
these companies have separate rates from a prior completed segment of
this proceeding. For these companies, antidumping duties shall be
assessed at the rate entered.
Also as noted in the Preliminary Results, the Department received
timely withdrawal requests for 94 other companies. These companies do
not have a separate rate, and, therefore, each currently remains part
of the PRC-wide entity,\12\ which is subject to this administrative
review. For these companies, antidumping duties shall be assessed at
the PRC-wide entity rate indicated below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ These 94 companies are included in the PRC-wide entity list
at Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of the remaining companies subject to these results, 20 are not
eligible for a separate rate as they did not submit separate rate
applications or certifications or were not subject to a withdrawal
request.\13\ As a result, the Department determines that these 20
companies are part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Department determines that Shijiazhuang Goodman
Trading Co., Ltd.'s (Goodman) sales were not bona fide and rescinded
its new shipper review. Because the sales subject to this review are
the same sales found to be non-bona fide in the new shipper review, the
Department is rescinding this administrative review with respect to
Goodman. For our determination with respect to Goodman, please refer to
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of the Administrative Review
The Department determines that the following weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the POR:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
average
Exporter margin
(dollars per
kilogram)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd.................... $1.82
Qingdao Xintianfeng Foods Co., Ltd...................... 1.82
Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd............................... 1.82
Chegwu County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co, Ltd..... 1.82
Yantai Jinyan Trading, Inc.............................. 1.82
Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd....................... 1.82
Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.............. 1.82
Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd..................... 1.82
Jinan Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd......................... 1.82
Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd....... 1.82
Rate Applicable to the Remaining Companies Under Review. 1.82
PRC-Wide Rate (which includes Hebei Golden Bird Trading 4.71
Co., Ltd)..............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations to parties in this proceeding
within five days after the date of issuance of this notice in the
Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review. The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of
these final results of review.\14\ In accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), for Xinboda, we are calculating importer- (or customer-)
specific assessment rates for the merchandise subject to this review.
For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping
margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will
calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio
of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined
sales and the total entered value of sales.\15\ We will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review when the importer-specific assessment rate is above de minimis.
Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero
or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ We note that Goodman's entries are currently covered by a
preliminary injunction in connection with the litigation concerning
the new shipper review. See Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co. v.
United States, CIT No. 14-00101. Therefore, these entries shall not
be liquidated until the preliminary injunction is lifted.
\15\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Golden Bird, entries will be assessed at the rate indicated
above.
For the separate rate companies not selected for individual
examination, we will instruct CBP to apply the rate listed above to
entries of subject merchandise exported by such companies and entered
during the period of review. This rate is the same as the rate for the
one mandatory respondent with a weighted-average dumping margin
determined without using the facts otherwise available.
For the PRC-wide entity, entries will be assessed at the PRC-wide
rate indicated above.
The Department recently announced a refinement to its assessment
practice in NME cases.\16\ Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for
entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by
companies
[[Page 36724]]
individually examined during this review, but that entered under the
case number of that exporter (i.e., at the individually-examined
exporter's cash deposit rate), the Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the
Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of
the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that
exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
\17\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above,
the cash deposit rate will be the weighted-average dumping margins
indicated above (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero
cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a
separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise
that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of $4.71 per kilogram; and (4)
for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary of Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). We request timely
written notification of return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
The Department issues and publishes this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213.
Dated: June 23, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Companies That Have Certified No Shipments
1. Jinxiang Chengda Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
2. Foshan Fuyi Food Co., Ltd.
3. Heze Ever-Best International Trade Co., Ltd.
4. Zhengzhou Huachao Industrial, Co., Ltd.
5. Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., Ltd.
6. Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd.
7. Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.
8. Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd.
9. Qingdao Sea-line International Trading Co.
10. XuZhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., Ltd.
11. Jining Yongjia Trade Co. Ltd.
12. Jinxiang Yuanxin Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
13. Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export Co. Ltd.
14. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd.
Appendix II
List of Companies Subject to the PRC-Wide Rate
1. American Pioneer Shipping
2. Anhui Dongqian Foods Ltd.
3. Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd.
4. Anqiu Haoshun Trade Co., Ltd.
5. APM Global Logistics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
6. APS Qingdao
7. Chiping Shengkang Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
8. CMEC Engineering Machinery Import & Export Co., Ltd.
9. Dongying Shunyifa Chemical Co., Ltd.
10. Dynalink Systems Logistics (Qingdao) Inc.
11. Eimskip Logistics Inc.
12. Feicheng Acid Chemicals Co., Ltd.
13. Frog World Co., Ltd.
14. Golden Bridge International, Inc.
15. Guangxi Lin Si Fu Bang Trade Co., Ltd
16. Hangzhou Guanyu Foods Co., Ltd.
17. Hebei Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd.
18. Henan Weite Industrial Co., Ltd.
19. Hongqiao International Logistics Co.
20. Intecs Logistics Service Co., Ltd.
21. IT Logistics Qingdao Branch
22. Jinan Solar Summit International Co., Ltd.
23. Jinan Yipin Corporation Ltd.
24. Jining De-Rain Trading Co., Ltd.
25. Jining Highton Trading Co., Ltd.
26. Jining Jiulong International Trading Co., Ltd.
27. Jining Tiankuang Trade Co., Ltd.
28. Jining Trans-High Trading Co., Ltd.
29. Jinxiang County Huaguang Food Import & Export Co., Ltd.
30. Jinxiang Dacheng Food Co., Ltd.
31. Jinxiang Dongyun Freezing Storage Co., Ltd. (a/k/a Jinxiang
Eastward Shipping Import and Export Limited Company)
32. Jinxiang Dongyun Import & Export Co., Ltd.
33. Jinxiang Fengsheng Import & Export Co., Ltd.
34. Jinxiang Grand Agricultural Co., Ltd.
35. Jinxiang Infarm Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd.
36. Jinxiang Meihua Garlic Produce Co., Ltd.
37. Jinxiang Shanyang Freezing Storage Co., Ltd.
38. Jinxiang Shenglong Trade Co., Ltd.
39. Jinxiang Tianheng Trade Co., Ltd.
40. Jinxiang Tianma Freezing Storage Co., Ltd.
41. Jinxiang Xian Baishite Trade Co., Ltd. (a/k/a Jinxiang Best
Trade Co., Ltd.)
42. Juye Homestead Fruits and Vegetables Co., Ltd.
43. Kingwin Industrial Co., Ltd.
44. Laiwu Fukai Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
45. Laizhou Xubin Fruits and Vegetables
46. Linshu Dading Private Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.
47. Linyi City Hedong District Jiuli Foodstuff Co.
48. Linyi City Kangfa Foodstuff Drinkable Co., Ltd.
49. Linyi Katayama Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.
50. Linyi Tianqin Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
51. Ningjin Ruifeng Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
52. Qingdao Apex Shipping Co., Ltd.
53. Qingdao BNP Co., Ltd.
54. Qingdao Cherry Leather Garment Co., Ltd.
55. Qingdao Chongzhi International Transportation Co., Ltd.
56. Qingdao Everfresh Trading Co., Ltd.
57. Qingdao Liang He International Trade Co., Ltd
58. Qingdao Lianghe International Trade Co., Ltd.
59. Qingdao Saturn International Trade Co., Ltd.
60. Qingdao Sino-World International Trading Co., Ltd.
61. Qingdao Winner Foods Co., Ltd.
62. Qingdao XinTian Feng Food Co., Ltd.
63. Qingdao Yuankang International
64. Qufu Dongbao Import & Export Trade Co., Ltd.
65. Rizhao Huasai Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
66. Samyoung America (Shanghai) Inc.
67. Shandong Chengshun Farm Produce Trading Co., Ltd.
68. Shandong Chenhe Intl Trading Co., Ltd.
69. Shandong China Bridge Imports
70. Shandong Dongsheng Eastsun Foods Co., Ltd.
71. Shandong Garlic Company
72. Shandong Longtai Fruits and Vegetables Co., Ltd.
[[Page 36725]]
73. Shandong Sanxing Food Co., Ltd.
74. Shandong Wonderland Organic Food Co., Ltd.
75. Shandong Xingda Foodstuffs Group Co., Ltd.
76. Shandong Yipin Agro (Group) Co., Ltd.
77. Shanghai Ever Rich Trade Company
78. Shanghai Goldenbridge International Co., Ltd.
79. Shanghai Great Harvest International Co., Ltd.
80. Shanghai LJ International Trading Co., Ltd.
81. Shanghai Medicines & Health Products Import/Export Co., Ltd.
82. Shanghai Yijia International Transportation Co., Ltd.
83. Shenzhen Fanhui Import & Export Co., Ltd.
84. Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., Ltd.
85. Shenzhen Xunong Trade Co., Ltd.
86. Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.
87. Sunny Import & Export Limited
88. T&S International, LLC.
89. Taian Eastsun Foods Co., Ltd.
90. Taian Fook Huat Tong Kee Pte. Ltd.
91. Taian Solar Summit Food Co., Ltd.
92. Taiyan Ziyang Food Co., Ltd.
93. Tianjin Spiceshi Co., Ltd.
94. U.S. United Logistics (Ningbo) Inc.
95. V.T. Impex (Shandong) Limited
96. Weifang Chenglong Import & Export Co., Ltd.
97. Weifang He Lu Food Import & Export Co., Ltd.
98. Weifang Hong Qiao International Logistics Co., Ltd.
99. Weifang Jinbao Agricultural Equipment Co., Ltd.
100. Weifang Naike Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.
101. Weifang Shennong Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
102. Weihai Textile Group Import & Export Co., Ltd.
103. WSSF Corporation (Weifang)
104. Xiamen Huamin Import Export Company
105. Xiamen Keep Top Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd.
106. Xinjiang Top Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.
107. XuZhou Heiners Agricultural Co., Ltd.
108. Yishui Hengshun Food Co., Ltd.
109. You Shi Li International Trading Co., Ltd.
110. Zhangzhou Xiangcheng Rainbow Greenland Food Co., Ltd.
111. Zhengzhou Dadi Garlic Industry Co., Ltd.
112. Zhengzhou Xiwannian Food Co., Ltd.
113. Zhengzhou Xuri Import & Export Co., Ltd.
114. Zhengzhou Yuanli Trading Co., Ltd.
115. Zhong Lian Farming Product (Qingdao) Co., Ltd.
Appendix III
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Selection of the Surrogate Country
Comment 2: Use of MERALCO to Calculate Electricity Rates
Comment 3: Excluding NME Country Data in Import Statistics
Comment 4: Excluding Data from Countries With Export Subsidies
Comment 5: Excluding Outlier (Aberrational) Data Using Statistical
Tools
Comment 6: Deducting Transportation Costs
Comment 7: Adjusting Brokerage and Handling Fees in CIF
Comment 8: Adjusting the Philippine ILO 6A Labor Calculation
Comment 9: Deducting Export Letter of Credit Fees
Comment 10: Adjusting SVs to Reflect Net kg
Comment 11: Using CIF Values Instead of FOB Values
Comment 12: Wholesale versus Farm Gate Prices
Comment 13: Differential Pricing Methodology Challenge
Comment 14: Country Wide Rate Challenge
Comment 15: 15-Day Liquidation Instruction Policy Challenge
Comment 16: Fraud Allegation Concerning Golden Bird's Export
Declarations to GACC
Comment 17: Hejia Ministerial Error, Certification of No Shipments
Comment 18: Separate Rate Request for Goodman
Comment 19: Weighted Average Margin Calculation for Goodman
Comment 20: Contemporaneous Calculation of SVs for Goodman
Comment 21: Separate Briefing Schedule for Golden Bird's SQR
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014-15279 Filed 6-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P