[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 1, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37259-37261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15469]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 60
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734; FRL-9913-22-OAR]
RIN 2060-AP93
Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters, New
Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces, and New
Residential Masonry Heaters
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; Notice of Data Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing this
Notice of Data Availability (NODA) in support of the proposed rule
titled, ``Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters,
New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces, and New
Residential Masonry Heaters'' that was published on February 3, 2014.
Through this NODA, the EPA is making available to the public, and
soliciting comment on, the specific additional information on
residential wood heater testing and certification that has been added
to the docket for the proposed rule. This comment period is limited to
comments on the specific data added and issues that relate to this
data; it is not an additional period to comment on other aspects of
this proposed rule.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734, by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
Email: [email protected], Attention Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734.
Fax: (202) 566-9744, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2009-0734.
Mail: United States (U.S.) Postal Service, send comments
to EPA Docket Center, WJC West Building (Air Docket), Attention Docket
ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004.
Please include a total of two copies.
Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, WJC West Building (Air
Docket), Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC,
Attention Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket ID number (EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734). The EPA's policy is that all
comments received will be included in the public docket without change
and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI, or otherwise protected,
through www.regulations.gov or email. Instead, clearly mark the
portions of the information that you claim to be CBI and send or
deliver only to the following address: Roberto Morales, OAQPS Document
Control Officer (C404-02), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711, Attention Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-
0734. For CBI information on a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to the EPA,
mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify
electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that
you claim as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment
that includes information claimed as CBI, you must submit a copy of the
comment that does not contain the portions of the information claimed
as CBI for inclusion in the public docket. If you submit a disk or CD-
ROM that does not contain CBI, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM
clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information not marked as CBI
will be included in the public docket and the EPA's electronic public
docket without prior notice. The portions of the information marked as
CBI will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set
forth in 40 CFR part 2.
The EPA requests that you also submit a separate copy of your
comments to the contact person identified below (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). You should send to this person only a copy of the
comment that does not contain the portions of information claimed as
CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means the EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to the EPA without going through www.regulations.gov,
your email address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, the EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: The EPA has established a docket for this rulemaking under
Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734. All documents in the docket are
listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only
in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available
either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA
Docket Center, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742. For additional
information about the EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gil Wood, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Outreach and Information Division, Community
and Tribal Programs Group (C304-03), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number:
(919) 541-5272; fax number: (919) 541-0242; email address:
[email protected].
[[Page 37260]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information in this NODA is organized as
follows:
I. Does this action apply to me?
II. What are the background and purpose of this NODA?
I. Does this action apply to me?
The entities that are potentially affected by this NODA are listed
in Table 1 below. This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but to
provide a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by
this NODA.
Table 1--Potentially Regulated Entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of
Category NAICS \a\ Code regulated entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Residential Wood Heating.... 333414--Heating Manufacturers,
Equipment (except owners and
Warm Air Furnaces) operators of wood
Manufacturing. heaters, pellet
heaters/stoves,
hydronic heaters,
and masonry
heaters.
333415--Air- Manufacturers,
Conditioning and owners and
Warm Air Heating operators of forced-
Equipment and air furnaces.
Commercial and
Industrial
Refrigeration
Equipment
Manufacturing.
238140--Masonry Manufacturers,
Contractors. owners, operators
and testers of
masonry heaters.
Testing Laboratories........ 541380--Testing Testers of wood
Laboratories heaters, pellet
(except Medical, heaters/stoves,
Veterinary). hydronic heaters
and masonry
heaters.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ North American Industry Classification System.
II. What are the background and purpose of this NODA?
On February 3, 2014, at 79 FR 6330, the EPA proposed to amend
standards of performance for New Residential Wood Heaters and to add
two new subparts: Standards of Performance for New Residential Hydronic
Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces and Standards of Performance for New
Residential Masonry Heaters. The EPA is issuing this NODA in support of
the proposed standards. Through this NODA, the EPA is making available
to the public, and soliciting comment on, additional information on
residential wood heater testing and certification that has been added
to the docket for the proposed rule. Specifically, we are making
available the following: (1) Additional details of certification
testing (using crib wood) of wood stoves and pellet stoves certified by
the EPA between January 1, 2010, and May 30, 2014; (2) details of cord
wood testing by two manufacturers of their EPA-certified catalytic wood
stoves; and (3) details of cord wood testing by Brookhaven National
Laboratory (BNL), under contract to the EPA, of an EPA-certified
noncatalytic wood stove.
1. Additional Details of Certification Testing (using crib wood) of
Wood Stoves and Pellet Stoves Certified by EPA between January 1, 2010
and May 30, 2014. All EPA-certified wood heaters that are offered or
advertised for sale in the United States are subject to the current
(1988) New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) for New Residential Wood
Heaters under the Clean Air Act (40 CFR part 60, subpart AAA). These
EPA-certified appliances are required to meet the particulate emissions
limit of 7.5 grams per hour (g/hr) for non-catalytic wood heaters and
4.1 g/hr for catalytic wood heaters.\1\ The model line certifications
are based primarily on testing of representative stoves by EPA-
accredited test laboratories according to EPA Method 28. Method 28 and
the NSPS require testing for each of four burn rate categories.
Category 4 is the maximum burn rate. Category 1 is the minimum burn
rate. Categories 2 and 3 are in between. In the EPA's February 3, 2014,
proposal, we proposed to update and strengthen the existing emission
limits for these wood heaters over a 5-year period. One of the aspects
of the proposal included requiring compliance for each of the
individual burn rates rather than just the weighted average. These
additional data supplement the previous data in the docket, which are
for wood stoves certified prior to January 1, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Under state law, wood stoves offered for sale in the state
of Washington must meet a particulate emissions limit of 4.5 g/hr
for non-catalytic wood stoves and 2.5 g/hr for catalytic wood
stoves.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of May 30, 2014, the EPA has certified approximately 1,000 wood
and pellet stove model lines that comply with the current NSPS. Summary
information, including weighted emission averages, for these stoves is
located at: http://www.epa.gov/Compliance/resources/publications/monitoring/caa/woodstoves/certifiedwood.pdf.
From February 1988 to December 31, 2009, the EPA certified over 900
wood stove model lines. Particulate matter emissions by burn rate for
most of the stoves in production on December 31, 2009, were summarized
by the Hearth, Patio and Barbecue Association (HPBA) in a database for
the EPA and the EPA included it in the docket prior to the February 3,
2014, proposal.
Since December 31, 2009, the EPA has certified over 100 wood stove
model lines that comply with the current NSPS. The EPA is announcing
the availability of detailed emissions data for each of these model
lines certified since December 31, 2009. Manufacturers and laboratories
previously used all-encompassing CBI claims to restrict public access
to these emission data. The EPA has gone through the official CBI
process to release the emission data.
The following data, for each model line certified since December
31, 2009, are available in the docket for the proposed rule (http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734):
Year of certification;
Average weighted emission rate;
Device type (i.e., catalytic stove, non-catalytic stove,
or pellet stove);
EPA test method used (e.g., 5G or 5H); and
Emission results for individual burn categories for all
burn rates--Categories 1, 2, 3 and 4. In some cases, there are multiple
test runs for some burn rate categories.
The EPA asks for comments on these data and how they may influence
the final rule.
2. Details of Cord Wood Testing by Two Manufacturers of Their EPA-
certified Catalytic Wood Stoves. The EPA has received emissions test
data from two catalytic wood stove manufacturers that show their EPA-
certified wood stoves tested using cord wood--and making no design
changes to adjust for crib wood versus cord wood in the tests--have
similar emissions as stoves tested using crib wood. That is, the test
data for an EPA-
[[Page 37261]]
certified Woodstock Soapstone stove and two EPA-certified stoves
produced by another manufacturer show particulate emission rates (g/hr)
using cord wood that are equal to or less than the corresponding test
data using crib wood for all burn rates. The EPA asks for comments on
these data and how they may influence the final rule.
3. Details of Cord Wood Testing by Brookhaven National Laboratory
(BNL), under Contract to the EPA, of an EPA-certified Noncatalytic Wood
Stove. Numerous comments on the February 3, 2014, proposal suggest that
manufacturers tune their stoves to the EPA crib wood certification test
method and that they would need to re-tune their stoves for the
proposed Step 2 cord wood certification test method. We believe this is
true and that manufacturers will soon adjust the combustion air flows,
directions and proportions to better match the change in hydrocarbon
volatilization rate due to the difference in surface area to volume
ratio for crib wood versus cord wood. However, numerous non-catalytic
stove manufacturers have indicated that they are waiting for the
proposed NSPS revisions to become final before they undergo the expense
of such testing. At this time, no manufacturer has submitted
particulate matter emissions test data for non-catalytic wood stoves
tuned to burn cord wood during tests similar to the EPA certification
tests or the ASTM (formerly known as the American Society for Testing
and Materials) draft cord wood test method.
In June 2014, BNL (under an EPA contract) conducted new emissions
testing of a popular non-catalytic EPA-certified wood stove using cord
wood. Existing EPA certification test data for crib wood based on the
current EPA Test Method 5G (http://www.epa.gov/ttnemc01/promgate/m-05g.pdf) were compared to the new test data for using cord wood (with
no stove design changes). Use of existing crib wood data were used for
the comparison in order to minimize the cost of the additional testing.
We note that this raises the question whether new crib wood testing
would have produced similar results as the previous crib wood testing.
Also, we note that the new cord wood testing was conducted with Method
5H, whereas the previous certification testing was conducted with
Method 5G. The results of the test show:
a. For a popular, current model non-catalytic stove that was not
adjusted by the manufacturer for burning cord wood instead of crib wood
during the certification test, the emission test results can be
significantly higher than the crib emission test results. As discussed
above, the proposed Step 2 reasonably anticipates that the
manufacturers would adjust the combustion air flows, directions and
proportions to better match the change in hydrocarbon volatilization
rate due to the difference in surface area to volume ratio for cribs
versus cord wood. However, that was not done for this new test series.
b. Repeatability of cord wood test method results can sometimes be
very good. For example, the results for three replicate tests for burn
rate Category 4 (the maximum burn rate) were within 15 percent of each
other.
c. Higher moisture content of the fuel can increase particulate
matter emissions.
The complete BNL test report and summary have been added to the
docket for the proposed rule at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734. The EPA asks for comments on
these data and how they may influence the final rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 24, 2014.
Mary E. Henigin,
Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014-15469 Filed 6-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P