[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43332-43335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17606]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2014-0214]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; South Bristol Gut Bridge Replacement,
South Bristol, ME
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Maine Department of Transportation (MEDOT) has requested
the Coast Guard to establish a regulated navigation area (RNA) on the
navigable waters of The Gut in South Bristol, Maine. Sector Northern
New England received notice of a proposed replacement of The Gut Bridge
in South Bristol, Maine between Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck. A
Bridge Permit was awarded to MEDOT on April 15, 2014 to begin in
accordance with plans dated September 24, 2013. This RNA would allow
the Coast Guard to enforce speed and wake restrictions and prohibit all
vessel traffic through the RNA during bridge replacement operations,
both planned and unforeseen, which could pose an imminent hazard to
persons and vessels operating in the area. This rule is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters during bridge
structural repair operations.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Lieutenant Junior Grade Elizabeth V. Gunn, Waterways Management
Division at Coast Guard Sector Northern New England, at 207-767-0398 or
email at [email protected]. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2013-0214] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an
[[Page 43333]]
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-0214) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one August 1, 2014, using one of the methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would
be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
On January 24, 2014, Sector Northern New England received notice of
a proposed replacement of The Gut Bridge in South Bristol, Maine
between Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck. A Bridge Permit was awarded
to Maine Department of Transportation (MEDOT) on April 15, 2014 to
begin in accordance with Plans dated September 24, 2013.
MEDOT has held seven public meetings between June 2009 and August
2013. Mariners have expressed no significant concerns.
On November 8, 2013, Public Notice 1-132 was disseminated by the
First Coast Guard District Bridge Program Manager. This notice included
the official plans being submitted for approval of a bridge permit and
solicited comments from the public. Twenty-five comments were received.
All comments were in support of burying the existing overhead
electrical cables rather than allowing them to remain in place above
the water. There were no comments received in opposition of the
proposed construction project or potential closures to the channel.
C. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are determined
to have hazardous conditions and in which vessel traffic can be
regulated in the interest of safety. See 33 U.S.C. 1231 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. The purpose of this proposed
rule is to ensure the safe transit of vessels in the area, and to
protect all persons, vessels, construction crews, and the marine
environment during bridge construction operations on The Gut in South
Bristol, ME, between Rutherford Island and Bristol Neck.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
MEDOT proposes to replace the existing movable bobtail swing bridge
over The Gut, which carries State Route 129 from Bristol Neck to
Rutherford Island, with a movable trunnion-style lift bridge on the
same alignment. The project is necessary to replace a structurally and
operationally deficient bridge that has exceeded its useful life.
Before demolition of the existing bridge commences, a temporary fixed
detour bridge will be constructed on the east side of the existing
bridge to provide for vehicular and pedestrian traffic throughout the
project. This temporary bridge will not be movable and will have a
fixed vertical clearance of 3 feet 11 inches. The existing bridge has a
vertical clearance of 4 feet 2 inches when closed. It is proposed that
marine traffic will be restricted from the project vicinity during the
removal of the existing bridge and construction of the new bridge. This
navigational channel closure is expected to last approximately seven
months and marine traffic will be detoured around Rutherford Island
during this time frame. Transit time around Rutherford Island is
approximately 20-60 minutes for mariners.
Further, all closures will be limited to specific hours of the day.
Mariners will be advised of all closure dates and times via Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners in advance of
closure times.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be minimal because
mariners are able to make a short transit (approximately 20-60 minutes)
around Rutherford Island to reach any destination on the other side of
The Gut.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit under the South Bristol Gut Bridge who cannot
clear the fixed temporary bridge of 3 feet 11 inches. The impact to
these entities would be minimal because mariners are able to make a
short transit (approximately 20-60 minutes) around Rutherford Island to
reach any destination on the other side of The Gut and the temporary
bridge is estimated to only be in place for about seven months.
[[Page 43334]]
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of an RNA. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination
are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0214 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0214 Regulated Navigation Area; South Bristol Gut Bridge
Replacement, South Bristol, ME.
(a) Location. The following area is a Regulated Navigation Area
(RNA): All navigable waters of The Gut in South Bristol, ME, from
surface to bottom, within a 300 yard radius of position 43[deg]51'43''
N, 069[deg]33'30'' W.
(b) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.10, 165.11, and
165.13 apply within the RNA.
(2) In accordance with the general regulations, entry into or
movement within this zone, during periods of enforcement, is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Northern New
England (COTP).
(3) Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the RNA
during periods of enforcement by contacting the COTP or the COTP's on-
scene representative on VHF-16 or via phone at 207-767-0303.
[[Page 43335]]
(4) During periods of enforcement, entry and movement within the
RNA is subject to a ``Slow-No Wake'' speed limit. Vessels may not
produce more than a minimum wake and may not attain speeds greater than
five knots unless a higher minimum speed is necessary to maintain
steerageway.
(5) During periods of enforcement, vessels must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's on-scene
representative. The ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on the COTP's behalf. The on-scene
representative may be on a Coast Guard vessel; Maine State Police,
Maine Marine Patrol or other designated craft; or may be on shore and
communicating with vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. Members of
the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators of
this regulation.
(6) During periods of enforcement, upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or other means, the
operator of the vessel must proceed as directed.
(7) All other relevant regulations, including but not limited to
the Rules of the Road (33 CFR 84--Subchapter E, Inland Navigational
Rules) remain in effect within the regulated area and must be strictly
followed at all times.
(c) Enforcement Period. This regulation is enforceable 24 hours a
day from 12:01 a.m. on September 1, 2014 until 11:59 p.m. on June 30,
2017.
(1) Prior to commencing or suspending enforcement of this
regulation, the COTP will give notice by appropriate means to inform
the affected segments of the public, to include dates and times. Such
means of notification will include, but are not limited to, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners.
(2) Violations of this RNA may be reported to the COTP at 207-767-
0303 or on VHF-Channel 16.
Dated: July 15, 2014.
L. L. Fagan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014-17606 Filed 7-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P