[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 2014)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 56235-56238] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2014-22208] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food Safety and Inspection Service 9 CFR Part 391 [Docket No. FSIS-2014-0026] RIN 0583-AD Change in Accredited Laboratory Fees AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 56236]] SUMMARY: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is amending its regulations to change the fees it charges for the accreditation and the maintenance of accreditation of non-Federal laboratories for the FSIS Accredited Lab Program (ALP). The fees in this final rule will be applied on the effective date. DATES: This final rule is effective November 18, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Williams, Room 6065, South Agriculture Building, 1400 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20250- 0235, Phone: (202) 720-5627, Email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background FSIS has been delegated the authority to exercise the functions of the Secretary of Agriculture (7 CFR 2.18, 2.53) as specified in the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) and the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451, et seq.). FSIS protects the public by verifying that meat and poultry products are wholesome, not adulterated, and properly marked, labeled, and packaged. In addition, under the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, as amended (7 U.S.C. 138-138i), FSIS has authority to accredit non-Federal laboratories. The accreditation allows non-Federal laboratories to conduct analyses of official regulatory meat and poultry samples. One provision (7 U.S.C. 138f) requires that a laboratory seeking accreditation under the 1990 Act or under the FMIA or PPIA pay a non-refundable accreditation fee to cover the costs of the Accredited Laboratory Program. Proposed and Final Rules On April 21, 2014, FSIS published a proposed rule to amend 9 CFR 391.5(a) to change the fee structure for the accreditation and the maintenance of the accreditation of laboratories for the FSIS Accredited Laboratory Program (ALP) (79 FR 22052). FSIS did not receive any comment on the proposed rule. Hence, it is adopting the proposed rule in its entirety as its final rule. FSIS explained in the proposed rule that under the regulations currently in effect, FSIS charges each laboratory a flat annual fee of $5,000 per accreditation or maintenance of accreditation. FSIS further explained that a laboratory may apply for FSIS accreditation and maintenance of accreditation in one to six analyte classes: Food Chemistry, chlorinated hydrocarbons (CHCs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), arsenic, nitrosamines, and sulfonamides. Under the regulations currently in effect, FSIS charges laboratories the flat rate of $5,000 for each accreditation obtained regardless of the type or the number of accreditations. A laboratory accredited for all six analyte classes is charged a total fee of $30,000. FSIS bills annually for the costs of the services it provides the laboratories, including the cost of FSIS auditing non-Federal laboratories, conducting periodic proficiency test sample studies, conducting on-site reviews, and maintaining accreditation (includes analyzing proficiency test results and documentation). FSIS explained that the costs to the ALP can be reduced when laboratories apply for multiple accreditations, because most of the cost to the Agency in conducting the ALP is in travel and administering sample studies to determine laboratory proficiency. Therefore, as proposed, FSIS is amending the regulations to include a sliding scale for accreditations and the maintenance of accreditations after payment of the base fee of $5,000 for the first accreditation that a laboratory receives. Under the final rule, FSIS will charge laboratories $5,000 per year for the first analyte class accreditation or maintenance of accreditation, $2,900 per year for the second, and $2,100 per year for each additional analyte class accreditation or maintenance of accreditation. As FSIS proposed, the final rule includes a fee of $2,900 \1\ for the second accreditation because FSIS staff can review multiple accreditations (different analyte classes) for the same laboratory in one trip. Under the final rule, FSIS will charge $2,100 \2\ each for the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth accreditations, because, when a laboratory has three or more accreditations, some of the instrument types and chemical processes are similar from analysis to analysis. This fact means that the review will be less labor-intensive. FSIS determined that costs to participants in the accredited laboratory program will cover the cost to the Agency for the administration of the program. The costs are included below in Table 1 and are based on available FSIS laboratory and personnel cost data. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Source: FSIS, OPHS, LQAS, Accredited Laboratory Program. \2\ Ibid. Table 1--ALP Fee Schedule ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Accreditations Item -------------------------------------- 1 2 3-6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Auditing of non-Federal $2,546 $816 $408 Laboratories.................... Proficiency Tests................ 1,237 1,237 1,237 Maintenance of Accreditation..... 918 536 153 Additional Costs................. 347 347 347 -------------------------------------- Total........................ 5,048 2,936 2,145 -------------------------------------- Rounded Total................ 5,000 2,900 2,100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563 Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This final rule has been designated a ``non-significant'' regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866. Accordingly, the rule has not [[Page 56237]] been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under E.O. 12866. Baseline The FSIS Accredited Laboratory Program, (ALP) is voluntary and charges a non-refundable accreditation fee. Currently, the annual fee is $5,000 per accreditation (Table 2). As discussed above, FSIS is reducing the fees after the first accreditation. Table 2 below compares current fees to proposed fees. Table 2--Current and Proposed Accreditation Fee Schedule ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Current New Accreditation accreditation accreditation lab fee lab fee ------------------------------------------------------------------------ First............................... $5,000 $5,000 Second.............................. 5,000 2,900 Third-Sixth......................... 5,000 2,100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Currently, there are 53 laboratories accredited for 60 activities.\3\ Most (42 out of 53) laboratories are accredited for food chemistry. There are 13 laboratories accredited for CHCs and five laboratories for PCBs. Only five of the 53 laboratories are accredited for more than one analyte. These laboratories are accredited for 2-3 analytes. The analysis below assumes laboratories will keep the same number of accreditations under the new fee structure. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ FSIS, OPHS, LQAS, Accredited Laboratory Program. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Expected Cost of the Final Rule For the purposes of this analysis, FSIS considered the pre- and post-rule cost to the industry; they are shown in Table 3 below. The cost to the industry will fall from $300,000 per year to $283,700 per year. Table 3--Annual Costs Pre- and Post-Rule ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre-rule Post-rule --------------------------------------------------- Number of analyte classes Industry Industry Number labs cost Number labs cost ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1........................................................... 48 $240,000 48 $240,000 2........................................................... 3 \4\ 30,000 3 \5\ 23,700 3........................................................... 2 30,000 2 20,000 --------------------------------------------------- 53 300,000 53 283,700 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Expected Benefits of the Final Rule The benefit accrued to the industry is equivalent to current accreditation costs minus the new accreditation costs which incorporate the efficiencies outlined in the preamble. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Calculation--Total Cost = (Accreditation 1 Cost * Number of Laboratories) + (Accreditation 2 Cost * Number of Laboratories) = ($5,000 * 3) + ($5,000 * 3). \5\ Calculation--Total Cost = (Accreditation 1 Cost * Number of Laboratories) + (Accreditation 2 Cost * Number of Laboratories) = ($5,000 * 3) + ($2,900 * 3). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The final rule will benefit the lab industry by offering a sliding accreditation fee schedule. The lower cost is a result of leveraging efficiencies in the current accreditation process that will allow the industry to realize cost savings if they increase the number of accreditations. Under the current accreditation fee schedule, the total industry cost is estimated as $300,000 ($300,000 = 60 Accreditations x $5,000) (Table 3). Therefore, the total industry cost is $283,700, a net benefit of $16,300 ($300,000 - $283,700 = $16,300). If the total number of accreditations remains unchanged, the present value of total industry net benefit due to the final rule (Table 4), adjusted with 3% inflation rate for 10 years is $139,000, resulting in an annualized expected benefit of $16,295. Table 4--Summary of Costs and Benefits ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Current costs Proposed costs Proposed Net Benefits (FY13) (FY14) benefits (10 years, 3%) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ $300,000 $283,700 $16,300 $139,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The FSIS Administrator certifies that, for the purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities in the United States. Paperwork Reduction Act This rule does not contain any new information collection or recordkeeping requirements that are subject to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) E-Government Act FSIS and USDA are committed to achieving the purposes of the E- Government Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et [[Page 56238]] seq.) by, among other things, promoting the use of the Internet and other information technologies and providing increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. Executive Order 12988 This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under this rule: (1) All State and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this rule; and (3) no retroactive proceedings will be required before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule. Executive Order 13175 This final rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation will not have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and will not have significant Tribal implications. Additional Public Notification FSIS will announce this notice online through the FSIS Web page located at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulations/federal-register. FSIS will also make copies of this Federal Register publication available through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal Register notices, FSIS public meetings, and other types of information that could affect or would be of interest to constituents and stakeholders. The Update is communicated via Listserv, a free electronic mail subscription service for industry, trade groups, consumer interest groups, health professionals, and other individuals who have asked to be included. The Update is also available on the FSIS Web page. In addition, FSIS offers an electronic mail subscription service which provides automatic and customized access to selected food safety news and information. This service is available at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/programs-and-services/email-subscription-service. Options range from recalls to export information to regulations, directives, and notices. Customers can add or delete subscriptions themselves, and have the option to password protect their accounts. USDA Nondiscrimination Statement No agency, officer, or employee of the USDA shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, or political beliefs, exclude from participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to discrimination any person in the United States under any program or activity conducted by the USDA. How To File a Complaint of Discrimination To file a complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, which may be accessed online at http://www.ocio.usda.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2012/Complain_combined_6_8_12.pdf, or write a letter signed by you or your authorized representative. Send your completed complaint form or letter to USDA by mail, fax, or email: Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410. Fax: (202) 690-7442. Email: [email protected]. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 391 Fees and charges. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, FSIS amends 9 CFR Chapter III as follows: PART 391--FEES AND CHARGES FOR INSPECTION AND LABORATORY ACCREDITATION 0 1. The authority citation for part 391 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138d, 7 U.S.C. 1622, 1627, and 2219a; 21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.; 21 U.S.C. 601-695. 0 2. Revise paragraph (a) of Sec. 391.5 to read as follows: Sec. 391.5 Laboratory accreditation fee. (a) The annual fee for the accreditation and maintenance of accreditation provided pursuant to Sec. 439.5 of this chapter shall be $5,000 for the first analyte class, $2,900 for the second analyte class, and $2,100 for each additional analyte class. * * * * * Done at Washington, DC, on September 11, 2014. Alfred Almanza, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2014-22208 Filed 9-18-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P