[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56368-56373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22357]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
SUMMARY: On June 15, 1984, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
delegated to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(Board) its approval authority under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.16, to approve of and assign OMB control numbers
to collection of information requests and requirements conducted or
sponsored by the Board under conditions set forth in 5 CFR 1320
Appendix A.1. Board-approved collections of information are
incorporated into the official OMB inventory of currently approved
collections of information. Copies of the Paperwork Reduction Act
Submission, supporting statements and approved collection of
information instruments are placed into OMB's public docket files. The
Federal Reserve may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not
required to respond to, an information collection that has been
extended, revised, or implemented on or after October 1, 1995, unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 18, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by FR 3063a or b
(government-administered, general-use prepaid cards); by any of the
following methods:
Agency Web site: http://www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/proposedregs.aspx.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include OMB
number in the subject line of the message.
FAX: (202) 452-3819 or (202) 452-3102.
Mail: Robert deV. Frierson, Secretary, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20551.
All public comments are available from the Board's Web site at
http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/proposedregs.aspx as submitted,
unless modified for technical reasons. Accordingly, your comments will
not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information. Public
comments may also be viewed electronically or in paper form in Room MP-
500 of the Board's Martin Building (20th and C Streets NW.) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays.
Additionally, commenters may send a copy of their comments to the
OMB Desk Officer--Shagufta Ahmed--Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office
Building, Room 10235 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503 or by
fax to (202) 395-6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the PRA OMB submission,
including the proposed reporting form and instructions, supporting
statement, and other documentation will be placed into OMB's public
docket files, once approved. These documents will also be made
available on the Federal Reserve Board's public Web site at: http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/reportforms/review.aspx or may be requested
from the agency clearance officer, whose name appears below.
Federal Reserve Board Acting Clearance Officer--John Schmidt--
Office of the Chief Data Officer, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551 (202) 452-3829. Telecommunications
Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may contact (202) 263-4869, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comment on Information Collection Proposals
The following information collections, which are being handled
under this delegated authority, have received initial Board approval
and are hereby published for comment. At the end of the comment period,
the proposed information collections, along with an analysis of
comments and recommendations received, will be submitted to the Board
for final approval under OMB delegated authority. Comments are invited
on the following:
a. Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the Federal Reserve's functions; including
whether the information has practical utility;
b. The accuracy of the Federal Reserve's estimate of the burden of
the proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
c. Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
d. Ways to minimize the burden of information collection on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
e. Estimates of capital or start up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
Proposal to approve under OMB delegated authority the extension for
three years of the following information collection, with revision:
Report title: Government-administered, General-use Prepaid Card
Surveys.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The issuer and government surveys, supporting statement, and
other documentation are available on the Board's public Web site at:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/reportforms/review.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency form number: FR 3063a and FR 3063b.
OMB control number: 7100-0343.
Frequency: Annual.
Reporters: Issuers of government-administered, general-use prepaid
cards (FR 3063a) and governments that administer general-use prepaid
card programs (FR 3063b).
Estimated annual reporting hours: FR 3063a: 375 hours; FR 3063b:
2,700 hours.
Estimated average hours per response: FR 3063a: 25 hours; FR 3063b:
15 hours.
Number of respondents: FR 3063a: 15; FR 3063b: 180.
General description of report: This information collection is
authorized by subsection 920(a) of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act
(EFTA), which was amended by section 1075(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act. 15
U.S.C. Sec. 1693o-2. EFTA Section 920(a) requires the Board to submit
an annual report to the Congress on the prevalence of the use of
general-use prepaid cards in Federal, State, or local government-
administered payment programs and on the interchange transaction fees
and cardholder fees charged with respect to the use of such general-use
prepaid cards. 15 U.S.C. 1693o-2(a)(7)(D). EFTA Section 920(a) also
provides the Board with authority to require issuers to
[[Page 56369]]
provide information to enable the Board to carry out the provisions of
the subsection. 15 U.S.C. 1693o-2(a)(3)(B). The obligation of issuers
to respond to the issuer survey (FR 3063a) is mandatory. However, the
obligation of state and local governments to respond to the government
survey (FR 3063b) is voluntary. A limited amount of information
collected on the FR 3063a issuer survey is publicly available, and
thus, is not accorded confidential treatment. However, most of the
information collected on the FR 3063a issuer survey is not publicly
available and may be kept confidential as explained herein. Data
collected by the issuer survey may be kept confidential under exemption
(b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which exempts from
disclosure ``trade secrets and commercial or financial information
obtained from a person and privileged or confidential.'' 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4). Such data may be kept confidential under exemption 4 if the
release of data would cause substantial harm to the competitive
position of the issuer. For example, certain issuer survey responses
would likely contain information related to an organization's revenue
structure and other proprietary and commercial information and the
release of such information would cause substantial harm to the
competitive position of the issuer and could therefore be kept
confidential under exemption 4. The information collected on the
government survey (FR 3063b) is not accorded confidential treatment.
Abstract: Section 1075(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act provides that the
Board shall provide annually a report to the Congress regarding the
prevalence of the use of general-use prepaid cards in federal, state,
and local government-administered payment programs, and the interchange
and cardholder fees charged with respect to the use of such prepaid
cards.\2\ Section 1075(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act also provides the Board
with authority to require card issuers to respond to information
requests as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of the
section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 1693o-2(a)(7)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Actions: The Board proposes to revise the issuer survey (FR
3063a) to collect data on the number of government programs broken out
by category of disbursement program; net funds loaded onto prepaid
cards broken out by gross funds loaded and funds voided or returned to
government offices, as well as by funds loaded pursuant to government-
administered programs and funds loaded from other sources; the average
daily value of funds outstanding; the value and volume of ATM
withdrawals broken out by proprietary (in-network) ATMs and
nonproprietary (out-of-network) ATMs; the amount reimbursed cardholders
for fees they incurred at nonproprietary ATMs; the value/volume of
over-the-counter at-bank (teller) withdrawals as well as fees assessed
to cardholders by third party banks for these withdrawals; the value of
settled purchase transactions and interchange fee revenue broken out by
transactions that are exempt and not exempt from the interchange fee
standards of Regulation II; and sources of revenue collected by issuers
other than interchange and cardholder fees. The Board also proposes to
combine current sections II and III as well as current sections XIII
and IX. In addition, the Board proposes that issuers not be required to
complete a separate survey for each program. Rather, issuers would be
required to complete one survey for federal programs in aggregate and
one survey for state/local programs in aggregate.
The Board proposes to revise the government survey (FR 3063b) to
collect data on the number of government programs reported in the
survey. In addition, the Board proposes to requests public comment on
the potential effects of repealing the FR 3063b survey.
Lastly, the Board proposes to make several clarifications to both
surveys and to delete questions that are no longer relevant from both
surveys.
Issuer Survey (FR 3063a)
The issuer survey is required for depository institutions that
issue general-use prepaid cards for federal, state, or local
government-administered payment programs. The survey requests
information on cards associated with accounts domiciled in the United
States, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories.
The current survey (last administered in early 2014) collects
information separately for each government-administered payment program
for which the depository institution is the issuer of general-use
prepaid cards. The current survey collects information on card programs
using two types of authentication mechanisms: Dual-message transactions
and single-message transactions.\3\ The cards issued pursuant to
government-administered payment programs may be either reloadable or
non-reloadable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In dual-message transactions, authorization information is
carried in one message and clearing information is carried in a
separate message (typically, these transactions are authenticated
with a signature). In single-message transactions, authorization and
clearing information is carried in one message (typically, these
transactions are authenticated with a PIN). General-use prepaid card
transactions may use either method (although dual-message
transactions are more common).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current issuer survey comprises nine sections:
I. Government-Administered, General-Use Prepaid Card Program
Information: Respondents report summary information on card programs
covered in the response including the name of the program(s), whether
the response covers federal or state/local programs, the geographic
areas where cards have been issued, the name of the sponsoring
government agency, the type of payment program, and the number of
recipients receiving payments on prepaid cards.
II. Government-Administered Payment Cards: Respondents report
summary information on the number of cards outstanding and the
allocation of cards outstanding between cards that can be used on both
dual-message and single-message networks, cards that can be used
exclusively on dual-message networks, and cards that can be used on
exclusively single-message networks. Respondents also report the number
of cards that can be used on two or more unaffiliated networks.
III. Funding: Respondents report the value of funds loaded into
prepaid card accounts and funds outstanding on prepaid card accounts.
IV. ATM Transactions: Respondents report summary information on the
number of cards outstanding at year-end that can be used to make ATM
cash withdrawals, the volume and value of ATM cash withdrawals, and the
ATM fees assessed to cardholders by ATM operators of nonproprietary
(out-of-network) ATMs.
V. Purchase Transactions: Respondents report summary information on
the volume and value of settled purchase transactions and the
allocation of the volume and value of settled purchase transactions
between single-message transactions and dual-message transactions.
VI. Fees Paid by Issuers: Respondents report the fees paid by
issuers to third parties for ATM cash withdrawals and over-the-counter
(OTC) at-bank (teller) cash withdrawals.
VII. Issuer Revenue: Interchange Fees: Respondents report
interchange fee revenue received on settled purchase transactions and
the allocation of interchange fee revenue received on dual-message
transactions and single-message transactions.
VIII. Issuer Revenue: Cardholder Fees: Respondents report total
revenue received on all fees assessed to cardholders and the allocation
revenue received from cardholder fees between purchase transaction
fees, ATM fees,
[[Page 56370]]
OTC fees, account servicing fees, routine monthly fees, customer
service inquiry fees, penalty fees, overdraft fees, and all other
cardholder fees.
IX. Fees Assessed to Cardholders: Respondents provide summary
information on fees assessed to cardholders, including purchase
transaction fees, ATM fees, OTC fees, account servicing fees, routine
monthly fees, customer service inquiry fees, penalty fees, overdraft
fees and all other cardholder fees.
Proposed Revisions to Issuer Survey (FR 3063a)
The Board proposes to modify the survey reporting structure to
reduce burden on respondents. Currently, a respondent is required to
complete the survey for each individual government-administered payment
program for which the respondent is the prepaid card issuer. The Board
has modified the survey instrument so that issuers will be required to
complete the survey only twice: Once for all federal programs (in
aggregate) and once for all state/local programs (in aggregate). The
Board believes that the proposed structure will reduce reporting burden
without significantly compromising the value of the data collected. In
addition, the Board proposes to streamline the survey by combining
relevant questions in current sections II and III and combining
relevant questions in current sections XIII and IX. A section-by-
section description of the changes is provided below.
Section I: Program Information (Renamed From ``Government-Administered,
General-Use Prepaid Card Program Information'')
Questions 1 and 2 (revised survey): Number of government-
administered payment program(s) covered in this response. The Board
proposes to add question 1 (to the revised survey) to obtain an
accurate count of the government-administered payment programs on which
issuers will report. The Board also proposes to add question 2 (to the
revised survey) which requests a breakout of the number of programs
between program categories (such as child support, payroll, and so on).
This breakout replaces question 5 (of the current survey) which asks
issuers to indicate (via a check box) categories on an individual
program basis. Questions 1 and 2 (of the revised survey) support the
Board's proposed revision to the reporting structure which would allow
issuers to provide aggregate responses for their programs.
Question 2 (current survey): Does this response cover a federal or
a state/local program(s)? The Board proposes to delete question 2 (of
the current survey). Under the proposed revision to the reporting
structure, respondents would complete the survey once for federal
programs and once for state/local programs.
Question 3 (current survey): Jurisdiction(s)--Geographic area in
which the government-administered, general-use prepaid cards have been
issued.
The Board proposes to delete question 3 (of the current survey).
The Board believes that the information captured in this question is no
longer necessary to support the Board's annual report.
Question 3 (revised survey): Name of program and sponsoring
government agency. The Board proposes to combine question 1 (of the
current survey) which asks for the name of the government-administered
payment program and question 4 (of the current survey) which requests
the name of the sponsoring government agency (the agency administering
a government-administered payment program). The combined question 3 (of
the proposed survey) provides a grid of input boxes so that a
respondent can enter information separately for each government program
included in a response. This new format supports the Board's proposed
revision to the reporting structure which would allow issuers to
provide aggregate responses for their programs.
Question 6 (current survey): Recipients receiving payments on
government-administered, general-use prepaid cards. The Board proposes
to delete question 6 (of the current survey). A cardholder may receive
payments on behalf of multiple individuals. As a result, an issuing
bank is sometimes unable to provide an accurate count of all
individuals receiving payments.
Section II: Government-Administered Payment Cards (Current Survey)--
(Deleted)
The Board proposes to delete section II (of the current survey),
which captures the number of prepaid cards outstanding, and a breakout
of this number between cards that can be used on single-message
networks, dual-message networks, and two or more unaffiliated networks.
The question requesting the total number of cards outstanding will be
moved to the section of the revised survey titled ``Card Funding.'' The
remaining questions in section II (of the current survey), which focus
on the network functionality of the cards outstanding, will be deleted.
In previous reports to the Congress on government-administered,
general-use prepaid cards, the Board reported on interchange fee
statistics broken out by single-message and dual-message transactions.
Interchange fee statistics for the broader population of general-use
prepaid cards by network type are published in the Board's other
reports on covered debit card issuers and payment card networks.
Because interchange fees by network type do not vary substantially
between government-administered, general-use prepaid cards and the
broader population of exempt general-use prepaid cards, the Board
believes that it is no longer necessary to collect network-related
information in this survey.
Section II: Card Funding (Renumbered From ``Section III'' and Renamed
From ``Funding'')
Question 1 (revised survey): Government-administered, general-use
prepaid cards outstanding. As discussed above, the Board proposes to
move this question from the deleted section titled ``Government-
Administered Payment Cards''.
Questions 2 and 3 (revised survey): Net funds loaded onto
government-administered, general-use prepaid cards. Question 1 (of the
current survey) asks for the funds loaded onto government-administered,
general-use prepaid cards. The Board is aware that program funds
initially made available to a cardholder may subsequently be removed
from the cardholder's account; specifically, funds may be voided or
returned to the government agency or other funding entity. Funds may be
removed from an account due to unused balances after a specified period
of time, long-term account inactivity, or some other reason (unrelated
to fees). The Board proposes to clarify the current question on funding
by asking for the net funds loaded onto cards (excluding funds voided
or returned) in question 2 (of the revised survey) and for a breakout
of net funds loaded onto cards between gross funds loaded and funds
voided or returned in question 3 (of the revised survey). In addition
to increasing survey clarity, this breakout would allow the Board to
calculate additional prevalence-of-use metrics.
Question 4 (revised survey): Net funds loaded by funding source.
The Board proposes to add question 4 (to the revised survey), which
requests a breakout of the net funds loaded onto government-
administered, general-use prepaid cards between funds loaded pursuant
to various categories of government-administered payment programs and
funds loaded from other
[[Page 56371]]
sources. Collecting funding information by program category type
supports the Board's proposed revision to the reporting structure which
would allow issuers to provide aggregate responses for their programs.
Further, for a covered issuer to receive the exemption from the
interchange fee standards of Regulation II with respect to cards issued
under a government-administered payment program, cardholders may use
their cards only to transfer or debit funds, monetary value, or other
assets that have been provided pursuant to the program. Question 4 (of
the revised survey) would allow the Board to better understand whether
(and if so, the extent to which) issuers fulfill this requirement to
receive the exemption.
Question 6 (revised survey): Average daily value of funds
outstanding. The Board proposes to add question 6 (to the revised
survey) to capture average daily balances on government-administered
general-use prepaid cards. Question 6 will allow the Board to calculate
additional prevalence-of-use metrics.
Section III: Cash Withdrawals (Renumbered From ``Section IV'' Renamed
From ``ATM Transactions'')
Questions 1: (current survey): Government-administered, general-use
prepaid cards outstanding that can be used to make ATM cash
withdrawals. The Board proposes to delete question 1 (of the current
survey) because it is no longer needed for the annual report.
Question 2 (revised survey): Total ATM cash withdrawals. The Board
proposes to add question 2 (to the revised survey) to obtain a breakout
of the total ATM cash withdrawal volume and value between withdrawals
at proprietary (in-network) and nonproprietary (out-of-network) ATMs.
This breakout would allow the Board to calculate new prevalence-of-use
metrics related to ATM transactions and to calculate ATM-fee metrics
more precisely.
Question 3a (revised survey): ATM fees reimbursed to cardholders.
The Board proposes to add question 3a (to the revised survey) to
capture the value of reimbursements made to cardholders by issuers for
ATM fees assessed by ATM operators of nonproprietary (out-of-network)
ATMs for cash withdrawals. Question 3a would allow the Board to
estimate cardholder fee metrics more precisely.
Questions 4-6 (revised survey): Over-the-counter at-bank (teller)
cash withdrawals. The Board proposes to add questions 4-6 (to the
revised survey) to capture information related to over-the-counter at-
bank (teller) cash withdrawals. These questions mirror questions 1-3
(of the revised survey) on ATM withdrawals. Information on over-the-
counter cash withdrawals would allow the Board to calculate additional
prevalence of use metrics and estimate fee metrics more precisely.
Section IV: Purchase Transactions (Renumbered From ``Section V'')
Question 1 (revised survey): Settled purchase transactions. The
Board proposes to specify that cash back amounts should be included in
the value of settled purchase transactions. The Board also proposes to
add question 1a.1 (to the revised survey) to request a breakout of the
value of transactions that included cash back between the purchase
value and cash-back value. The Board believes the new language and
additional question will enhance survey clarity. Further, the breakout
of the purchase and cash-back amounts will allow the Board to calculate
additional prevalence-of-use metrics.
Question 2 (current survey): Settled purchase transactions by
network type. The Board proposes to delete question 2 (of the current
survey) which asks for a breakout of total settled purchase
transactions (volume and value) between single-message transactions and
dual-message transactions. As discussed above in the paragraph titled
``Section II: Government-Administered Payment Cards (current survey),''
the Board believes that it is no longer necessary to collect network-
related information in this survey.
Question 2 (revised survey): Exempt vs. non-exempt transactions.
The Board proposes to add question 2 (to the revised survey) to break
out total settled purchase transactions (volume and value) between
transactions that are exempt and not exempt from the interchange fee
standards of Regulation II.
An electronic debit transaction made using a general-use prepaid
card that has been provided pursuant to a government-administered
payment program is exempt from the interchange fee standards for a
given calendar year if one of the following two conditions applies:
(1) The issuer, along with its affiliates worldwide, has assets
that are less than $10 billion, as of December 31 of the prior calendar
year.
(2) The issuer, along with its affiliates worldwide, has assets
that are greater than or equal to $10 billion, as of December 31 of the
prior calendar year, and all of the following conditions apply:
The cardholder may use the debit card only to transfer or
debit funds, monetary value, or other assets that have been provided
pursuant to a government-administered payment program;
The issuer does not charge a fee for overdrafts, including
a shortage of funds or a transaction processed for an amount exceeding
the account balance, unless the fee or charge is imposed for
transferring funds from another asset account to cover a shortfall in
the account accessed by the card; and
The issuer does not charge a fee for the first withdrawal
per calendar month from an ATM that is part of the issuer's designated
ATM network.
The breakout in question 2 (of the revised survey) would allow the
Board to better understand whether (and if so, the extent to which)
issuers choose to receive the exemption with respect to their
government-administered, general-use prepaid card programs, and
further, would allow the Board to calculate interchange fee metrics for
both exempt and non-exempt transactions.
Section V: Fees Paid by Issuers (Renumbered From ``Section VI'')
There are no proposed changes to the questions in this section.
Section VI: Issuer Revenue: Interchange Fees (Renumbered From ``Section
VII'')
Question 2 (current survey): Interchange fee revenue by network
type. The Board proposes to delete question 2 (of the current survey)
which asks for the breakout of total interchange fee revenue between
revenue received from single-message transactions and dual-message
transactions. As discussed above in the paragraph titled ``Section II:
Government-Administered Payment Cards (current survey)'', the Board
believes that it is no longer necessary to collect network-related
information in this survey.
Question 2 (revised survey): Exempt vs. non-exempt transactions.
The Board proposes to add question 2 (to the revised survey) to break
out the total interchange fee revenue between interchange fee revenue
from transactions that are exempt and those that are not exempt from
the interchange fee standards of Regulation II. This breakout would
allow the Board to better understand whether (and if so, the extent to
which) issuers receive the exemption from the interchange fee standards
of Regulation II with respect to their government-administered prepaid
card programs, and, further, would allow the Board to calculate
interchange-fee metrics for both exempt and non-exempt transactions.
[[Page 56372]]
Section VII: Issuer Revenue: Cardholder Fees (Renumbered From ``Section
VIII'')
The Board proposes to combine relevant questions related to
cardholder fee revenue in sections XIII and IX (of the current survey)
to streamline the survey and reduce reporting burden. The current
section IX, which contains detailed questions on each type of
cardholder fee, would be eliminated, significantly reducing the number
of questions in the survey.
Questions 1 and 2 (revised survey): All fees assessed to
cardholders. Questions 1 and 2 (of the current survey) ask for the
total revenue received from certain types of cardholder fees. The Board
proposes to add a column of numerical boxes to request the number of
times each type of fee was assessed, a column of numerical boxes to
request the number of programs in which each type of fee is subject to
government-imposed restrictions, and a column of text boxes to request
a description of government-imposed restrictions on fees. These
additional questions appear in section IX (of the current survey)
titled ``Fees Assessed to Cardholders'', which, as discussed below, the
Board is also proposing to eliminate. In addition to reducing reporting
burden, the Board believes that combining the questions related to
cardholder fee revenue with those requesting the number of times fees
were assessed will increase survey clarity and the quality of submitted
responses. Further, the numerical box intended to collect the number of
programs in which each type of fee is subject to government-imposed
restrictions allows issuers to report aggregate information on
government imposed restrictions (in contrast to the `yes/no' question
format in the current survey). Therefore, this new question format
supports the Board's proposed revision to the reporting structure which
would allow issuers to provide aggregate responses for their programs.
Section XIII (Revised Survey): Issuer Revenue: Other (New Section)
The Board proposes to create a new section titled ``Issuer Revenue:
Other'', with four questions to capture revenue received by issuers
that are not captured by the current survey:
Question 1 (revised survey): Total revenue received from fees
assessed to government office(s).
Question 2 (revised survey): Total value of incentive payments
received from payment card networks. Incentive payments are payments
received by an issuer from a payment card network with respect to debit
card transactions or debit-card-related activity. Issuer incentives may
be based on reaching specified volume levels, promoting the network's
brand through marketing activities, converting the issuer's debit card
base to a different signature network, or undertaking other activities.
Incentive payments do not include payments from a network to an issuer
for traditional banking services the issuer provides the network (for
example, transaction account services to the network).
Question 3 (revised survey): Total revenue received from all other
sources.
This new section will provide the Board with a more complete
picture of the types of revenue received by issuers of government-
administered, general-use prepaid cards.
Section IX: Fees Assessed to Cardholders (Current Survey)--(Deleted)
The Board proposes to eliminate section IX (of the current survey)
to reduce reporting burden. As discussed above under the heading
``Section VII: Issuer Revenue: Cardholder Fees'', the Board proposes to
combine specific questions in sections XIII and IX (of the current
survey). Those questions in section IX (of the current survey) that
were not combined with section XIII (of the current survey) would be
eliminated. The Board believes that the information captured in the
deleted questions are no longer relevant for the report process.
Government Survey (3063b)
The government survey is voluntary and is sent to state and local
government offices to submit information about the prevalence of use of
general-use prepaid cards in federal, state, and local government-
administered payment programs. The current government survey (last
administered in early 2014) comprises three sections:
1. Government-Administered, General-Use Prepaid Card Program
Information: Respondents report summary information on the government-
administered payment program(s) covered in the response, whether the
response covers federal or state/local programs, sponsoring government
agency/agencies, card-issuing bank(s), the type of payment program(s),
the number of recipients receiving payments (by any payment method),
and the number of recipients receiving payments by prepaid cards.
2. Cards: Respondents report the number of cards outstanding at
year-end.
3. Funding: Respondents report the value of funds loaded into
prepaid card accounts and the value of all funds paid (by all payment
methods).
Proposed Revisions to Government Survey (FR 3063b)
Section I: Government-Administered, General-Use Prepaid Card Program
Information
Question 1a (revised survey): Number of government-administered
payment program(s) covered in this response. The Board proposes to add
question 1a (to the revised survey) to obtain a more accurate count of
the programs government offices are reporting on.
Question 2 (revised survey): Sponsoring government agency. The
Board proposes to combine question 4 (of the current survey) which
requests the name of the sponsoring agency (the agency administering a
government-administered payment program) and question 2 (of the current
survey) which asks whether the response covers a state/local or federal
program. The combined question 2 (of the revised survey) would ask for
the name of the sponsoring agency and whether the sponsoring agency's
jurisdiction is state/local or federal. The Board believes that
combining the two questions will improve survey clarity and the quality
of submitted responses.
Section II: Number of Cards (Renamed From ``Government-Administered
Payment Cards'')
There are no proposed changes to the questions in this section.
Section III: Funds Disbursed to Payment Recipients (Renamed From
``Funding'')
Questions 1 and 2: The Board proposes to reorder and modify
questions 1 and 2. Respondents would first report total funds disbursed
in question 1 (of the revised survey) and break that figure out between
funds disbursed by prepaid cards and funds disbursed by all other
payment methods in question 2 (of the revised survey). The Board
expects that this breakout will improve question clarity and the
quality of submitted responses.
Additional Request for Comment Regarding the Government Survey
The Board requests specific comment regarding the potential impact
of eliminating the government survey (FR 3063b). The Board currently
uses the responses provided by government agencies to calculate and
report prevalence-of-use metrics; specifically, the government data
allow the Board to report the ratio of funds disbursed by prepaid cards
to funds disbursed by all payment methods (check, ACH, payment cards,
etc.) across different
[[Page 56373]]
types of government-administered payment programs. Should the Board
decide to eliminate the government survey, it would rely on data from
the issuer survey (FR 3063a) to report on prevalence of use. Because
issuers of government-administered prepaid cards are unable to report
on the value of government-agency disbursements made by payment methods
other than prepaid cards, the Board would not report the ratio of funds
disbursed by prepaid card to funds disbursed by all payment methods.
However, the Board would report alternative prevalence-of-use metrics,
including the value of funds loaded onto government-administered
prepaid cards, the volume and value of settled purchase transactions,
and the volume and value of ATM withdrawals.
The Board believes that eliminating the government survey would
significantly reduce reporting burden on the public. At the same time,
however, this change could increase burden on the public in other
respects, because some members of the public may rely on the
prevalence-of-use ratio currently reported by the Board. The Board
requests specific comment on whether the potential benefits of
eliminating the government survey outweigh the potential costs.
The Board also requests specific comment regarding the existence of
reputable reports or other data sources that would allow the Board to
continue to calculate the ratio of the value funds disbursed by prepaid
card to funds disbursed by all payment methods. As discussed above, the
Board currently collects prepaid card funding information with the
issuer survey. The Board is interested in finding reputable data
sources containing the value of funds disbursed by all payment methods
at the program category level. For example, the Board has identified
potential data sources for four categories:
1. Unemployment insurance programs--the United States Department of
Labor publishes total unemployment insurance outlays under the
Unemployment Insurance Chartbook.
2. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)--the United
States Department of Agriculture publishes total outlays under the SNAP
program on its data Web site.
3. Payroll programs--the United States Census Bureau publishes
payroll estimates for federal, state, and local governments based on
its Annual Survey of Public Employment and Payroll.
4. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) programs--The
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services publishes annual TANF
expenditures on its data Web site.
The Board requests specific comment on whether additional sources
of expenditure data at the program category level exist.
The proposed revisions to both surveys would be effective for the
collection during the first half of 2015 of calendar year 2014 data.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 16,
2014.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-22357 Filed 9-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P