[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57143-57144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22728]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2014-0204]
Quality Assurance Program Description--Design Certification,
Early Site Permit and New License Applicants
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Standard review plan--draft section revision; request for
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is soliciting
public comment on draft NUREG-0800, ``Standard Review Plan for the
Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR
Edition,'' Section 17.5, ``Quality Assurance Program Description--
Design Certification, Early Site Permit and New License Applicants.''
DATES: Comments must be filed no later than November 24, 2014. Comments
received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for
comments received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(unless this document describes a different method for submitting
comments on a specific subject):
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0204. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration,
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-44M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
For additional direction on accessing information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan DeGange, Office of New
Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001; telephone: 301-415-6992 or email to: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2014-0204 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information regarding this document. You may
obtain publicly-available information related to this document by any
of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0204.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC
Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-
based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced in this document (if that document is
available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is
referenced. The proposed SRP Section 17.5, Revision 1, ``Quality
Assurance Program Description--Design Certification, Early Site Permit
and New License Applicants,'' is available in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML14035A202. A redline strikeout comparing the proposed Revision 1 and
current Revision 0 can be found in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML14035A201.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2014-0204 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make
your comment submission available to the public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in you
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into
ADAMS.
[[Page 57144]]
The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.
II. Further Information
The NRC is seeking public comment on the proposed revision to SRP
Section 17.5. This section has been developed to assist the NRC's staff
review Quality Assurance (QA) program descriptions under part 50 of
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). The revisions to
this SRP section reflect no changes in staff position, nor are new SRP
acceptance criteria introduced. The changes simplify and reflect plain
language throughout in accordance with the NRC's Plain Writing Action
Plan. Additionally, the staff has aligned SRP Section 17.5 with
Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.28, ``Quality Assurance Program Criteria
(Design and Construction),'' Revision 4 and RG 1.33, ``Quality
Assurance Program Requirements (Operation),'' Revision 2. The changes
also reflect alignment with the latest edition of NQA-1-2008/2009a
which the staff found acceptable for meeting the requirement of
Appendix B to 10 CFR part 50.
Following the NRC staff's evaluation of public comments, the NRC
intends to finalize SRP Section 17.5, Revision 1 in ADAMS and post it
on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/. The SRP is guidance for the NRC
staff. The SRP is not a substitute for the NRC's regulations, and
compliance with the SRP is not required.
III. Backfitting and Issue Finality
Issuance of this draft SRP, if finalized, would not constitute
backfitting as defined in 10 CFR 50.109 (the Backfit Rule) or otherwise
be inconsistent with the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52.
The NRC's position is based upon the following considerations:
1. The draft SRP positions, if finalized, would not constitute
backfitting, inasmuch as the SRP is internal guidance to the NRC staff.
The SRP provides internal guidance to the NRC staff on how to
review an application for NRC regulatory approval in the form of
licensing. Changes in internal staff guidance are not matters for which
either nuclear power plant applicants or licensees are protected under
either the Backfit Rule or the issue finality provisions of 10 CFR part
52.
2. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the SRP positions on
existing licensees either now or in the future.
The NRC staff does not intend to impose or apply the positions
described in the draft SRP to existing licenses and regulatory
approvals. Hence, the issuance of a final SRP--even if considered
guidance within the purview of the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR
part 52--would not need to be evaluated as if it were a backfit or as
being inconsistent with issue finality provisions. If, in the future,
the NRC staff seeks to impose a position in the SRP on holders of
already issued licenses in a manner that does not provide issue
finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision, then
the staff must make the showing as set forth in the Backfit Rule or
address the criteria for avoiding issue finality as described in the
applicable issue finality provision.
3. Backfitting and issue finality do not--with limited exceptions
not applicable here--protect current or future applicants.
Applicants and potential applicants are not, with certain
exceptions, protected by either the Backfit Rule or any issue finality
provisions under 10 CFR part 52. Neither the Backfit Rule nor the issue
finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52--with certain exclusions--were
intended to apply to every NRC action that substantially changes the
expectations of current and future applicants. The exceptions to the
general principle are applicable whenever an applicant references a 10
CFR part 52 license (e.g., an early site permit) and/or NRC regulatory
approval (e.g., a design certification rule) with specified issue
finality provisions.
The NRC staff does not, at this time, intend to impose the
positions represented in the draft SRP in a manner that is inconsistent
with any issue finality provisions. If, in the future, the staff seeks
to impose a position in the draft SRP in a manner that does not provide
issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision,
then the staff must address the criteria for avoiding issue finality as
described in the applicable issue finality provision.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of September, 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph Colaccino,
Chief, New Reactor Rulemaking and Guidance Branch, Division of Advanced
Reactors and Rulemaking, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2014-22728 Filed 9-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P