[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70483-70488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27949]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
18 CFR Part 40
[Docket No. RM14-10-000]
Real Power Balancing Control Performance Reliability Standard
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission proposes to approve
Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 (Real Power Balancing Control
Performance) and proposed new definitions submitted by the North
American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). The proposed
Reliability Standard is designed to ensure that applicable entities
maintain system frequency within narrow bounds around a scheduled
value. In addition, the Commission proposes that NERC submit an
informational filing that would address the impact of the proposed
Reliability Standard on inadvertent interchange and unscheduled power
flows.
DATES: Comments are due January 26, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by docket number, may be filed in the
following ways:
Electronic Filing through http://www.ferc.gov. Documents
created electronically using word processing software should be filed
in native applications or print-to-PDF format and not in a scanned
format.
Mail/Hand Delivery: Those unable to file electronically
may mail or hand-deliver comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Comment
Procedures Section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Enakpodia Agbedia (Technical Information), Office of Electric
Reliability, Division of Reliability Standards, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426,
Telephone: (202) 502-6750, [email protected].
Mark Bennett (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-8524, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Under section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA),\1\ the
Commission proposes to approve Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 (Real
Power Balancing Control Performance) that the North American Electric
Reliability Corporation (NERC), the Commission-certified Electric
Reliability Organization (ERO), submitted for approval. The proposed
Reliability Standard applies to balancing authorities and regulation
reserve sharing groups, and is designed to maintain Interconnection
frequency within predefined frequency limits. The Commission also
proposes to approve the retirement of currently-effective Reliability
Standard BAL-001-1 immediately prior to the effective date of BAL-001-
2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 16 U.S.C. 824(o) (2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Further, the Commission proposes to approve NERC's four proposed
definitions, associated violation risk factors and violation severity
levels, implementation plan, and effective dates. The Commission also
proposes that NERC submit an informational filing that would address
the impact of the proposed Reliability Standard on inadvertent
interchange \2\ and unscheduled power flows.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ NERC defines ``Inadvertent Interchange'' in the NERC
Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards (Glossary) as
``[t]he difference between the Balancing Authority's Net Actual
Interchange and Net Scheduled Interchange. (IA -
IS)''
\3\ ``Unscheduled power flows'' generally refers to the power
flows that result from the law of physics that causes power from a
given source to flow over all possible paths to its destination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background
A. Mandatory Reliability Standards and Order No. 693 Directive
3. Section 215 of the FPA requires a Commission-certified Electric
Reliability Organization (ERO) to develop mandatory and enforceable
Reliability Standards that are subject to Commission review and
approval. Specifically, the Commission may approve, by rule or order, a
proposed Reliability Standard or modification to a Reliability Standard
if it determines that the Standard is just, reasonable, not unduly
discriminatory or preferential and in the public interest.\4\ Once
approved, the Reliability Standards may be enforced by NERC, subject to
Commission oversight, or by the Commission independently.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 16 U.S.C. 824o(d)(2).
\5\ 16 U.S.C. 824o(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Pursuant to section 215 of the FPA, the Commission established a
process to select and certify an ERO,\6\ and subsequently certified
NERC.\7\ On March 16, 2007, the Commission issued Order No. 693,
approving 83 of the 107 Reliability Standards filed by NERC, including
BAL-001-0 and a companion standard BAL-002-0.\8\ When approving BAL-
002-0, the Commission directed NERC ``to modify this Reliability
Standard to define a significant deviation and a reportable event,
taking into account all events that have an impact on frequency, e.g.,
loss of supply, loss of load and significant scheduling problems, which
can cause frequency disturbances and to address how balancing
authorities should respond.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Rules Concerning Certification of the Electric Reliability
Organization; and Procedures for the Establishment, Approval, and
Enforcement of Electric Reliability Standards, Order No. 672, FERC
Stats. & Regs. ] 31,204, order on reh'g, Order No. 672-A, FERC
Stats. & Regs. ] 31,212 (2006).
\7\ North American Electric Reliability Corp., 116 FERC ]
61,062, order on reh'g and compliance, 117 FERC ] 61,126 (2006),
aff'd sub nom. Alcoa, Inc. v. FERC, 564 F.3d 1342 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
\8\ Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk-Power System,
Order No. 693, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,242, order on reh'g, Order
No. 693-A, 120 FERC ] 61,053 (2007). The Commission approved
Reliability Standard BAL-001-1 in an unpublished letter order,
October 16, 2013 in Docket No. RD13-11-000.
\9\ Id. P 355.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2
5. On April 2, 2014, NERC filed a petition (Petition) seeking
approval of proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2, four new
definitions to be added to the Glossary of Terms used in NERC
Reliability Standards (NERC Glossary of
[[Page 70484]]
Terms) and the associated violation risk factors and violation severity
levels, effective dates, and implementation plan.\10\ NERC states that
the proposed Reliability Standard is just, reasonable, not unduly
discriminatory or preferential, and in the public interest because it
satisfies the factors set forth in Order No. 672, which the Commission
applies when reviewing a proposed Reliability Standard.\11\ Also, NERC
asserts that proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 addresses the
Commission's Order No. 693 directive pertaining to BAL-002-0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 is available on the
Commission's eLibrary document retrieval system in Docket No. RM14-
10-000 and on the NERC Web site, www.nerc.com.
\11\ NERC Petition at 6 and Exhibit C (citing Order No. 672,
FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,204 at PP 323-335, 444).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. NERC proposes to revise Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 by
replacing the Control Performance Standard 2 (CPS2) in currently-
effective Requirement R2 with a new term, ``Balancing Authority ACE
Limit (BAAL).'' \12\ The Balancing Authority ACE Limit, unique for each
balancing authority, contains dynamic limits as a function of
Interconnection frequency and provides the basis for a balancing
authority's obligation to balance its resources and demand in real-time
so that its clock-minute average ACE does not exceed its Balancing
Authority ACE Limit for more than 30 consecutive clock-minutes.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Area Control Error (ACE) is the instantaneous difference
between a Balancing Authority's Net Actual and Scheduled
Interchange, taking into accounts the effects of Frequency Bias,
correction for meter error, and Automatic Time Error Correction, if
operating in that mode.
\13\ NERC Petition at 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 has two requirements and
two attachments containing the mathematical equations for calculating
the Control Performance Standard 1 (CPS1) in Requirement R1,\14\ the
Balancing Authority ACE Limit in Requirement R2, and associated
measures. NERC states that the only proposed change to Requirement R1
is to move the equation and explanation of the individual components of
CPS1 to Attachment 1. NERC explains that the proposed revisions to
Requirement R1 ``are administratively efficient and clarify the intent
of the Requirement.'' \15\ NERC states that the ``underlying
performance aspect'' of Requirement R1 remains the same: ``to measure
how well a Balancing Authority is able to control its generation and
load management programs, as measured by its ACE, to support its
Interconnection's frequency over a rolling one-year period.'' \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The ``Responsible Entity'' designated in proposed
Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 Requirement R1 is the balancing
authority and/or regulation reserve sharing groups.
\15\ NERC Petition at 11.
\16\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Proposed Requirement R2 is new and replaces the existing Control
Performance Standard 2 requirement. The current Reliability Standard
BAL-001-1 Requirement R2 requires each balancing authority to operate
such that for at least 90 percent of the ten-minute periods in a
calendar month (using six non-overlapping periods per hour), the
average area control error (ACE) must be within a specific limit,
referred to as L10.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Reliability Standard BAL-001-1 available at: http://www.nerc.com/pa/Stand/Reliability%20Standards/BAL-001-1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Requirement R2 of the proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2
states:
Balancing Authority shall operate such that its clock-minute
average of Reporting ACE does not exceed its clock-minute Balancing
Authority ACE Limit (BAAL) for more than 30 consecutive clock-
minutes, calculated in accordance with Attachment 2, for the
applicable Interconnection in which the Balancing Authority
operates.
10. NERC explains that the Balancing Authority ACE Limits are
unique for each balancing authority and provide dynamic limits for the
balancing authority's ACE value as a function of its Interconnection
frequency.\18\ NERC states that the proposed Reliability Standard is
intended to enhance the reliability of each Interconnection by
maintaining frequency within predefined limits under all conditions.
Furthermore, NERC states that proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2
and accompanying definitions include the benefits of the Automatic Time
Error Correction (ATEC) equation in the WECC-specific regional variance
in Reliability Standard BAL-001-1.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ NERC Supplemental Filing at 1.
\19\ NERC Petition at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. NERC also proposes violation risk factors and violation
severity levels for each requirement of the proposed Reliability
Standard and an implementation plan and effective dates. NERC states
that these proposals were developed and reviewed for consistency with
NERC and Commission guidelines.
12. NERC proposes an effective date for the proposed Reliability
Standard that is the first day of the first calendar quarter that is
twelve months after the date of Commission approval. NERC states that
its proposed implementation date will allow entities to make any
software adjustment that may be required to perform the Balancing
Authority ACE Limit calculations.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ NERC Petition at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. On May 9, 2014, NERC submitted a supplemental filing
(Supplemental Filing) to address the status of the Commission directive
in Order No. 693 pertaining to Reliability Standard BAL-002-0 and
update the Commission regarding the status of a field trial undertaken
for proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2.\21\ In its Supplemental
Filing, NERC reiterates the importance of the proposed revision
establishing dynamic limits for a balancing authority's ACE as a
function of the Interconnection frequency, stating that ``[o]ne of the
reliability benefits of the proposed Reliability Standard is that it
allows Balancing Authorities to calculate their position within these
boundaries on a real-time basis and take action to support
reliability.'' \22\ Further, NERC states that proposed Reliability
Standard BAL-001-2 addresses the Commission's directive related to BAL-
002-0 ``in an equally efficient and effective manner'' \23\ NERC adds
that revisions to Reliability Standard BAL-002-1 are currently being
developed and will complement proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2
that is the subject of the immediate proceeding.\24\ Regarding the
ongoing field trial, NERC stated that ``the widespread participation of
Balancing Authorities has provided insight into how the changes in
proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 will impact reliability.'' \25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ NERC Supplemental Filing at 1.
\22\ Id. at 2.
\23\ Id. at 3.
\24\ The Commission notes that the currently-effective
Reliability Standard BAL-002-1 requires balancing authorities to
return its ACE to zero within 15 minutes following a reportable
disturbance. However, the Field Trial Report does not provide any
information whether compliance with Reliability Standard BAL-002-1
had any impact on the proposed Balancing Authority ACE Limits in
Reliability Standard BAL-001-2. Any future modifications to BAL-002
should take this into consideration.
\25\ NERC Supplemental Filing at 6, noting that 47 balancing
authorities participated in the Field Trial Report: 16 in the
Eastern Interconnection, 29 in the Western Interconnection, ERCOT
and Quebec.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. On July 31, 2014, NERC submitted an informational filing
(Informational Filing) of its Preliminary Field Trial Report (Field
Trial Report) evaluating the effects of proposed Reliability Standard
BAL-001-2. NERC states that the Field Trial Report results to date
demonstrate that the correlation between Requirements R1 and R2 of
proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 drive corrective actions to
support Interconnection frequency and reliability.\26\ NERC also states
that the Balancing Authority ACE Limit, in conjunction with currently-
effective
[[Page 70485]]
Reliability Standard BAL-003-1 (Frequency Response and Frequency Bias
Setting), satisfies the directive.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ NERC Field Trial Report at 1.
\27\ Id. at 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Discussion
15. Pursuant to FPA section 215(d)(2), we propose to approve
Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 as just, reasonable, not unduly
discriminatory or preferential, and in the public interest. We propose
to approve NERC's four proposed definitions, violation risk factor and
violation severity level assignments, and the retirement of currently-
effective BAL-001-1.\28\ Likewise, we propose to approve NERC's
implementation plan, in which NERC proposes an effective date of the
first day of the first calendar quarter, twelve months after the date
of Commission approval.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ NERC proposes four definitions for inclusion in the
Glossary of Terms Used in NERC Reliability Standards: Regulation
Reserve Sharing Group, Reserve Sharing Group Reporting ACE,
Reporting ACE, and Interconnection. As stated in Exhibit G,
Consideration of Comments at 13, ``Regulation Reserve Sharing
Group'' would be added to the NERC Compliance Registry prior to
implementation of the proposed standard.
\29\ NERC Petition Exhibit B at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. The purpose of proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 is to
control Interconnection frequency within defined limits. Proposed
Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 includes both long and short term
performance measures for Interconnection frequency control by providing
dynamic (i.e., real-time) limits that are specific for each balancing
authority and Interconnection. By basing Balancing Authority ACE Limits
on pre-defined frequency trigger limits for each Interconnection, we
believe the real-time measurements established in proposed Reliability
Standard BAL-001-2 will help ensure the Interconnection frequency
returns to a reliable state should a balancing authority's ACE, or the
Interconnection's frequency, exceed acceptable bounds.
17. We agree with NERC's assertion that the Balancing Authority ACE
Limit is a real-time measure of a balancing authority's required
performance and encourages operation in support of the Interconnection
frequency and drives corrective action back within predefined ACE
limits when helpful for adjusting Interconnection frequency.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ NERC Field Trial Report at 23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
18. Further, we believe that the NERC proposal satisfies the
directive set forth in Order No. 693 that NERC modify Reliability
Standard BAL-002 ``. . . to define a significant deviation and a
reportable event, taking account all events that have an impact on
frequency, e.g., loss of supply, loss of load and significant
scheduling problems. . . .'' \31\ In particular, we believe that NERC's
statement that the Balancing Authority ACE Limit, in conjunction with
currently-effective Reliability Standard BAL-003-1, satisfies the
directive.\32\ We also believe that Reliability Standard BAL-003-1
addresses the Commission's Order No. 693 directive with regard to
events that have an impact on frequency due to the loss of supply and
proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 addresses aspects of the same
directive with regard to loss of load. Further, we accept NERC's
explanation that proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 addresses the
Commission's Order No. 693 directive with regard to the need to more
broadly define reportable events and that the proposed standard sets a
variable joint megawatt limit (i.e., real-time) that is dependent on
concurrent Interconnection frequency. With regard to the aspect of the
Order No. 693 directive requiring that reportable events account for
loss of load, we agree with NERC's statement that loss of load can
cause a mismatch in supply and demand that results in a positive change
in frequency.\33\ We accept NERC's explanation that the Balancing
Authority ACE Limit has been shown to be effective in limiting the
duration that the Interconnection frequency is impacted by loss of
supply, loss of load or any other conditions causing a balancing
authority to exceed its Balancing Authority ACE Limit.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ Order No. 693, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,242 at P 355.
\32\ NERC Field Trial Report at 4.
\33\ Id. at 7.
\34\ Id. at 27.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
19. In sum, we believe the statements in NERC's Petition,
Supplemental Filing, and Informational Filing provide sufficient
technical support that NERC has addressed the Commission's Order No.
693 directive in an equally and effective manner.\35\ While we propose
to approve Reliability Standard BAL-001-2, we also propose that NERC
submit an informational filing--discussed immediately below--regarding
the potential of proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 to contribute
to unscheduled power flows and inadvertent interchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ NERC Supplemental Filing at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Potential for Proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 To Contribute
to Unscheduled Power Flows and Inadvertent Interchange
20. NERC states that, as a proof of concept for the Balancing
Authority ACE Limit requirement, a field trial was endorsed by the NERC
Operating committee and subsequently approved by the NERC Standards
Committee in June 2005.\36\ During the development of the proposed
Reliability Standard, some stakeholders that participated in the field
trial commented to the NERC standard drafting team that the proposed
Balancing Authority ACE Limit established in Requirement R2 of BAL-001-
2 has caused increased system operating limit violations, particularly
in the Western Interconnection. For example, one large transmission
operator commented that the proposed Balancing Authority ACE Limit
could increase the number of system operating limit violations, and
could possibly cause large unscheduled power flows resulting in an
increased ACE.\37\ Another NERC stakeholder commented that the proposed
Reliability Standard could provide opportunities for entities to create
unscheduled power flows within the standard's boundaries, without
regard to the impacts and which could lead to system operating limit
violations due to large ACEs.\38\ The same stakeholder commented that
the Western Electricity Coordinating Council has decided to apply a
limit of four times a balancing authority's L10 to limit ACE
deviations from balancing authority flows that negatively impact the
transmission system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ Id. at 3.
\37\ NERC Petition, Exhibit G, Consideration of Comments April
2013, at 43.
\38\ Id. at 77.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
21. In addition, in the Field Trial Report, NERC asserts that there
is no relationship between the Balancing Authority ACE Limit field
trial and accumulated inadvertent interchange in either the Eastern or
Western Interconnections.\39\ However, due to a large allowance in ACE
deviations in real-time while still complying with the proposed
Balancing Authority ACE Limit, an increase in the amount of inadvertent
interchange on the bulk electric system of all Interconnections may
result.\40\ In other words, proposed
[[Page 70486]]
BAL-001-2 could allow balancing authorities to have a very large
deviation from an ACE of zero and still be compliant with the dynamic
values of the Balancing Authority ACE Limits in the proposed
Reliability Standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ NERC Field Trial Report at 20.
\40\ A comparison between the existing Control Performance
Standard 1 curves and the Balancing Authority ACE Limit curves shown
in NERC's Field Trial Report indicates that there are large ACE
deviations at the boundaries of 60 +/- 0.02 Hz. Id. Figure 5 at 24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
22. The Commission is concerned that the Balancing Authority ACE
Limit in proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 may have an unintended
consequence of (i) allowing significant amounts of unscheduled power
flows, creating an undue burden for transmission operators and
reliability coordinators to address power flows approaching or
exceeding system operating limits or interconnection reliability
operating limits, and (ii) the significant increase in inadvertent
interchange could result in an adverse reliability impact between real-
time operations and day and/or hour-ahead analysis performed by
reliability coordinators and transmission operators.
23. Based on the concerns discussed above, the Commission proposes
to direct that NERC submit an informational filing following
implementation of the proposed Reliability Standard to monitor
unscheduled power flows and inadvertent interchange in the Western and
Eastern Interconnections. Specifically, for the two-year period
following implementation (i.e., the effective date) of the standard,
the Commission proposes to direct NERC to provide the number of SOL/
IROL violations, the date and time, location, the duration and
magnitude, due to unscheduled power flows and inadvertent interchange
within Western and the Eastern Interconnections. This information will
provide NERC, the Commission, and other interested entities with the
material to evaluate the effect of Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 on
unscheduled power flows and inadvertent interchange and the resulting
consequences on the Bulk-Power System. Accordingly, the Commission
proposes to direct that NERC provide data on unscheduled power flows
and inadvertent interchange for a two-year period following
implementation of the proposed Reliability Standard.
24. The Commission proposes to direct NERC to submit the
informational filing 90 days after the end of the two-year period
following implementation. Should the data indicate reliability issues
due to increases in unscheduled power flows and inadvertent interchange
under the new Balancing Authority ACE Limit at any time during the two-
year period of study, the Commission expects that NERC will immediately
propose and implement adequate remedies. The Commission seeks comments
from NERC, and other interested entities on the proposed informational
filing. The Commission also seeks comment whether any additional data
would support the analysis and, thus, should be provided with the
informational filing. Furthermore, the Commission also seeks comment on
whether a regional variance would be necessary for those regions that
experienced adverse impacts during the field trial due to inadvertent
interchange.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ The Western Interconnection applies a limit of four times a
balancing authority's L10 to limit ACE deviations from
balancing authority flows that negatively impact the transmission
system. Id. at 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Information Collection Statement
25. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations require
that OMB approve certain reporting and recordkeeping (collections of
information) imposed by an agency.\42\ Upon approval of a collection(s)
of information, OMB will assign an OMB control number and expiration
date. Respondents subject to the filing requirements of this rule will
not be penalized for failing to respond to these collections of
information unless the collections of information display a valid OMB
control number.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ 5 CFR 1320.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
26. The Commission is submitting these reporting and recordkeeping
requirements to OMB for its review and approval under section 3507(d)
of the PRA. Comments are solicited on the Commission's need for this
information, whether the information will have practical utility, the
accuracy of the provided burden estimate, ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and any
suggested methods for minimizing the respondent's burden, including the
use of automated information techniques.
27. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposes to approve
revisions to Reliability Standard BAL-001-2. NERC states in its
petition that the proposed Reliability Standard defines a new concept:
Balancing Authority ACE Limit, which is unique for each balancing
authority and provides dynamic limits for a balancing authority's ACE
value as a function of the Interconnection frequency.\43\ NERC states
that the proposed Reliability Standard improves reliability by adding a
frequency component to the measurement of a balancing authority's ACE,
and allows for the formation of ``Regulation Reserve Sharing Groups.''
NERC's proposed Reliability Standard requires a balancing authority to
balance its resources and demand in real-time so that the clock-minute
average of its ACE does not exceed its Balancing Authority ACE Limit
for more than 30 consecutive clock-minutes. Furthermore, NERC states
that proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 and accompanying
definitions include the benefits of the Automatic Time Error Correction
equation in the WECC-specific regional variance in Reliability Standard
BAL-001-1.\44\ The proposed Reliability Standard and related reporting
requirements are applicable to balancing authorities and regulation
reserve sharing groups.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ NERC Petition at 12.
\44\ Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
28. Public Reporting Burden: Our estimate below regarding the
number of respondents is based on the NERC Compliance Registry as of
October17, 2014. According to the NERC Compliance Registry, there are
71 balancing authorities in the Eastern Interconnection, 34 balancing
authorities in the Western Interconnection and one balancing authority
in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT). The Commission
bases individual burden estimates on the time needed for balancing
authorities to develop tools needed to facilitate reporting that are
required in the Reliability Standard. These burden estimates are
consistent with estimates for similar tasks in other Commission-
approved Reliability Standards. The following estimates relate to the
requirements for this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in Docket No. RM14-
10-000.
[[Page 70487]]
RM14-10-000 Final Rule
[BAL-001-2: Real Power Balancing Control Performance] \45\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual number
Number of of responses Total number Average burden & cost Total annual burden Cost per
respondents per of responses per response hours & total annual respondent ($)
respondent cost \46\
(1) (2) (1)*(2)=(3) (4)..................... (3)*(4)=(5) (5)/(1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BA/RRSG: \47\ Update and Maintain 106 1 106 8 hours per response.... 848 (106*8) $1030
Energy Management Systems. $1030 (8 x $128.76)..... $109,180 (1030*106)
BA: Record Retention \48\............ 106 1 106 4....................... 424 112
$112.................... $11,872
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................ .............. .............. 212 ........................ 1,272 1,142
$121,052
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Mandatory Reliability Standards for BAL-001-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ Proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 applies to
balancing authorities and regulation reserve sharing groups.
However, the burden associated with the BA complying with
Requirement R1 is not included within this table because the
Commission accounted for it under Commission-approved Reliability
Standards BAL-001-1.
\46\ The estimated hourly costs (salary plus benefits) are based
on Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) information (available at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm) for an electrical engineer
($60.87/hour) and a lawyer ($128.76).
\47\ BA=Balancing Authority; RRSG=Regulation Reserve Sharing
Group.
\48\ $28/hour, based on a Commission staff study of record
retention burden cost.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action: Proposed Collection FERC-725R.
OMB Control No.: 1902-0268.
Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit institutions; not-for-
profit institutions.
Frequency of Responses: On Occasion.
Necessity of the Information: This proposed rule proposes to
approve the Reliability Standard pertaining to requiring balancing
authorities to operate such that its clock-minute average reporting ACE
does not exceed its clock-minute Balancing Authority ACE Limits for
more than 30 consecutive clock-minutes. The proposed Reliability
Standard Requirement R2 provides each balancing authority a dynamic ACE
limit that is a function of Interconnection frequency. The proposed
Reliability Standard will provide dynamic limits that are balancing
authority and Interconnection specific. In addition, these ACE limits
are based on identified Interconnection frequency limits to ensure the
Interconnection returns to a reliable state when an individual
balancing authority's ACE or Interconnection frequency deviation
contributes undue risk to the Interconnection.
Internal Review: The Commission reviewed the proposed Reliability
Standard and made a determination that its action is necessary to
implement section 215 of the FPA. These requirements, if accepted,
should conform to the Commission's expectation for generation and
demand balance throughout the Eastern and Western Interconnections as
well as within the ERCOT Region.
29. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting
requirements by contacting the following: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426 [Attention:
Ellen Brown, Office of the Executive Director, email:
[email protected], phone: (202) 502-8663, fax: (202) 273-0873].
30. For submitting comments concerning the collection(s) of
information and the associated burden estimate(s), please send your
comments to the Commission and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503
[Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
phone: (202) 395-4638, fax: (202) 395-7285]. For security reasons,
comments to OMB should be submitted by email to:
[email protected]. Comments submitted to OMB should include
FERC-725R and Docket Number RM14- 10-000.
IV. Environmental Analysis
31. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental
Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may
have a significant adverse effect on the human environment.\49\ The
Commission has categorically excluded certain actions from this
requirement as not having a significant effect on the human
environment. Included in the exclusion are rules that are clarifying,
corrective, or procedural or that do not substantially change the
effect of the regulations being amended.\50\ The actions proposed here
fall within this categorical exclusion in the Commission's regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, Order No. 486, FERC Stats. & Regs., Regulations
Preambles 1986-1990 ] 30,783 (1987).
\50\ 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
32. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) \51\ generally
requires a description and analysis of proposed rules that will have
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
As shown in the information collection section, the proposed
Reliability Standard applies to 106 entities. Comparison of the
applicable entities with the Commission's small business data indicates
that approximately 23 \52\ are small business entities. Of these, the
Commission estimates that approximately five percent, or one of these
small entities, will be affected by the new requirements of the
proposed Reliability Standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\51\ 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
\52\ 21.4 percent of the total number of affected entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
33. The Commission estimates that the small entities that will be
affected by proposed Reliability Standard BAL-001-2 will incur one-time
compliance cost up to $109,180 (i.e. the cost of updating and
maintaining energy management systems), resulting in cost of
approximately $1,030 per balancing authority and/or regulation reserve
sharing groups. These costs represent an estimate of the costs a small
entity could
[[Page 70488]]
incur if the entity is identified as an applicable entity. The
Commission does not consider the estimated cost per small entity to
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, the Commission certifies that this NOPR will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
VI. Comment Procedures
34. The Commission invites interested persons to submit comments on
the matters and issues proposed in this notice to be adopted, including
any related matters or alternative proposals that commenters may wish
to discuss. Comments are due January 26, 2015. Comments must refer to
Docket No. RM14-10-000, and must include the commenter's name, the
organization they represent, if applicable, and their address in their
comments.
35. The Commission encourages comments to be filed electronically
via the eFiling link on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov. The Commission accepts most standard word processing
formats. Documents created electronically using word processing
software should be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format
and not in a scanned format. Commenters filing electronically do not
need to make a paper filing.
36. Commenters that are not able to file comments electronically
must send an original of their comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
37. All comments will be placed in the Commission's public files
and may be viewed, printed, or downloaded remotely as described in the
Document Availability section below. Commenters on this proposal are
not required to serve copies of their comments on other commenters.
VII. Document Availability
38. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
Internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) and
in the Commission's Public Reference Room during normal business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426.
39. From the Commission's Home Page on the Internet, this
information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is
available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing,
printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type
the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in
the docket number field.
40. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's
Web site during normal business hours from the Commission's Online
Support at (202) 502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at
[email protected], or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-
8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. Email the Public Reference Room at
[email protected].
By direction of the Commission.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27949 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P