[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72625-72629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28688]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-831]
Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of the Nineteenth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-
2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting the
nineteenth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh
garlic from the People's Republic of China (PRC) covering the period of
review (POR) November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013.\1\ We
preliminary determine that the two mandatory respondents in this
review, Hebei Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd. (Golden Bird) and Jinxiang
Hejia Co., Ltd.
[[Page 72626]]
(Hejia), each failed to establish that it is separate from the PRC-wide
entity. As a result, the PRC-wide entity is now under review.\2\ We are
preliminarily applying adverse facts available (AFA) to the PRC-wide
entity because elements of the entity, Golden Bird and Hejia, failed to
cooperate by not acting to the best of their ability to comply with the
Department's requests for information. The Department is preliminarily
determining that seven companies are entitled to a separate rate.
Finally, the Department is also preliminarily determining that 16
companies made no shipments during the POR. If these preliminary
results are adopted in our final results of review, we will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise during the POR. We
invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR
79392 (December 30, 2013) (Initiation Notice).
\2\ On November 4, 2013, the Department announced a change in
practice with respect to the condition review of the NME entity. See
Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department
Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings
and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME
Antidumping Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (Nov. 4, 2013). The change in
practice is not applicable in this administrative review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: December 8, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5255.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order includes all grades of garlic,
whole or separated into constituent cloves. Fresh garlic that are
subject to the order are currently classified under the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010,
0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000,
and 2005.90.9700. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written product description
remains dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance regarding ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results and Preliminary Rescission of the 2012-2013 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of
China,'' dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by
this notice (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''), for a complete
description of the Scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this
notice.\4\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS).\5\ ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit (CRU),
Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition,
parties can obtain a complete version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum on the Internet at http://trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\5\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the
name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS'') to AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). The Web site location was
changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov.
The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be
found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-Wide Entity
The two mandatory respondents, Golden Bird and Hejia, each failed
to respond to the Department's requests for information and/or declined
to participate in this review and therefore, each failed to establish
eligibility for separate rate status. Accordingly, the Department
preliminarily finds that the PRC-wide entity includes these companies.
Elements of the entity failed to provide necessary information for the
Department to conduct a review. Accordingly, the Department has relied
on facts available.\6\ Further, the Department finds that the PRC-wide
entity failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to
comply with a request for information. Therefore, pursuant to section
776(b) of the Act, the Department used an adverse inference when
selecting from among the facts otherwise available.\7\ Thus, the
Department relied on AFA in order to determine a margin for the PRC-
wide entity, pursuant to sections 776(a)(1), 776(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) and
776(b) of the Act.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See sections 776(a)(1) and (2)(A)-(C) of the Act.
\7\ See section 776(b) of the Act.
\8\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the sections
pertaining to ``PRC-Wide Entity'' and ``Selection of Adverse Facts
Available (AFA) Rate'' for a discussion of the AFA rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 29, 2014, the Department rescinded this review for companies
for whom requests for review were withdrawn and which had a separate
rate from a prior segment of this proceeding.\9\ The Department finds
that 92 of the companies whose review requests were withdrawn had not
been assigned a separate rate from a prior segment of the proceeding,
and thus are considered part of the PRC-wide entity. Further, an
additional 30 companies for which a review was requested, and not
withdrawn, did not file a separate rate application or certification,
nor did they file a no shipments certification.\10\ Accordingly,
because these companies did not demonstrate their eligibility for a
separate rate, the Department preliminarily determines that they are
also part of the PRC-wide entity. A full list of companies
preliminarily determined to be part of the PRC-wide entity can be found
in Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China:
Partial Rescission of the 19th Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 30819 (May 29, 2014).
\10\ See the Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the sections
pertaining to ``PRC-Wide Entity.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination of Separate Rates for Non-Selected Companies
In accordance with section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act, the Department
employed a limited examination methodology, as it determined that it
would not be practicable to examine individually all companies for
which a review request was made. There were seven exporters of subject
merchandise from the PRC that have demonstrated their eligibility for a
separate rate but which were not selected for individual examination in
this review. These seven exporters of subject merchandise that have
demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate, but which were not
selected for an individual examination in this review are: Chengwu
County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co, Ltd.; Jinxiang Richfar Fruits
and Vegetables Co., Ltd.; Qingdao Lianghe International Trade Co.,
Ltd., Shandong Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Xinboda
Industrial Trading Co., Ltd.; Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics
Co., Ltd.; and XuZhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., Ltd.
Neither the Act nor the Department's regulations address the
establishment of the rate applied to individual
[[Page 72627]]
companies not selected for examination where the Department limited its
examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2)
of the Act. The Department's practice in cases involving limited
selection based on exporters accounting for the largest volumes of
trade has been to look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance,
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs the Department
to use rates established for individually investigated producers and
exporters, excluding any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available in investigations. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of
the Act provides that, where all rates are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available, the Department may use ``any reasonable
method'' for assigning a rate to non-examined respondents. The
weighted-average margin preliminarily determined for the individually-
examined respondents in this review is based entirely on facts
available. For the preliminary results, the Department has
preliminarily determined to assign a rate of 1.82 U.S. dollars per
kilogram, which is the rate for separate rate companies for the most
recently completed (18th) administrative review.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the 18th Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 79 FR 36721 (June 30, 2014)
(2011-2012 Garlic Final).
See also Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic
of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 76
FR 64318 (October 18, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
The companies listed in Appendix I timely filed ``no shipment''
certifications stating that they had no entries of subject merchandise
during the POR.\12\ Consistent with its practice, the Department asked
CBP to conduct a query of potential shipments made by these companies.
CBP did not provide evidence that contradicted the parties' no shipment
claims. Based on the certifications by these companies and our analysis
of CBP information, we preliminarily determine that the companies
listed in Appendix I did not have any reviewable transactions during
the POR. In addition, the Department finds that consistent with its
refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy (NME)
cases, further discussed below, it is appropriate not to rescind the
review in part in these circumstances but to complete the review with
respect to these 16 companies and issue appropriate instructions to CBP
based on the final results of the review.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The Department notes that Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co.,
Ltd. and Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd., companies who
participated in the November 1, 2012, to April 30, 2013 new shipper
review (see, e.g., Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of the Semiannual Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review
of Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and Cangshan Qingshui
Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.; 2012-2013, 79 FR 62103 (October 16,
2014)) certified that it had not shipments between May 1, 2013 and
October 31, 2013.
\13\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011); see
also ``Assessment Rates'' section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
Regarding the administrative review, the Department preliminarily
determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist
for the period November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
margin
Exporter (dollars
per
kilogram)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd...... 1.82
Jinxiang Richfar Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd.............. 1.82
Qingdao Lianghe International Trade Co., Ltd............... 1.82
Shandong Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd............. 1.82
Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd....................... 1.82
Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd.......... 1.82
XuZhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., Ltd..................... 1.82
PRC-Wide Rate.............................................. 4.71
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Comment & Opportunity To Request a Hearing
Unless otherwise notified by the Department, interested parties may
submit written comments (case briefs) no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of these preliminary results of review and rebuttal
comments (rebuttal briefs) within five days after the time limit for
filing case briefs.\14\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2), rebuttal
briefs must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs. Parties who
submit arguments are requested to submit with the argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and, (3) a
table of authorities.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1).
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of
publication of this notice.\16\ Hearing requests should contain the
following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to
be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs.\17\ If a party requests a hearing, the
Department will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing
which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location
to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time,
and location of the hearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\17\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to issue the final results of this review,
including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any
written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication
of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine,
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
covered by this review.\18\ The Department will direct CBP to assess
rates based on the per-unit (i.e., per kilogram) amount on each entry
of the subject merchandise during the POR. The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date
of the final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, the Department announced a refinement to its assessment
practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for
merchandise that was not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted
by an exporter individually examined during this review, but that
entered under the case number of that exporter (i.e., at the
individually-examined exporter's cash deposit rate), the Department
will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the NME-wide rate. In
addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review
had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that
entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's
rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements, when imposed, will apply
to all shipments of subject merchandise
[[Page 72628]]
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
publication of the final results of this administrative review, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies
listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in
these final results of review (except, if the rate is zero or de
minimis, a zero cash deposit rate will be required for that company);
(2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent
period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not
been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
will be the PRC-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. dollars per kilogram; and (4)
for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 1, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--Companies That Have Certified No Shipments
1. Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.
2. Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd.
3. Jinan Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd.
4. Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd.
5. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd.
6. Jinxiang Chengda Import & Export Co., Ltd.
7. Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd.
8. Jinxiang Yuanxin Import & Export Co., Ltd.
9. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd.
10. Shijazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.
11. Qingdao Maycarrier Import & Export Co., Ltd.
12. Qingdao Sea-line International Trading Co.
13. Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd.
14. Qingdao Xiangtiangfeng Foods Co., Ltd. or Xi Tian Feng
15. Xuzhou Simple Garlic Industry Co., Ltd.
16. Yantai Jinyan Trading Inc.
Appendix II--List of Companies Subject to the PRC-Wide Rate
1. American Pioneer Shipping
2. Anhui Dongqian Foods Ltd.
3. Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd.
4. Anqiu Haoshun Trade Co., Ltd.
5. APM Global Logistics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
6. APS Qingdao
7. Chiping Shengkang Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
8. CMEC Engineering Machinery Import & Export Co., Ltd.
9. Dalian New Century Food Co., Ltd.
10. Dongying Shunyifa Chemical Co., Ltd.
11. Dynalink Systems Logistics (Qingdao) Inc.
12. Eimskip Logistics Inc.
13. Feicheng Acid Chemicals Co., Ltd.
14. Foshan Fuyi Food Co, Ltd.
15. Frog World Co., Ltd.
16. Golden Bridge International, Inc.
17. Goodwave Technology Development Ltd.
18. Guangxi Lin Si Fu Bang Trade Co., Ltd
19. Hangzhou Guanyu Foods Co., Ltd.
20. Hebei Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd.
21. Hejiahuan (Zhongshan) Electrical AP
22. Henan Weite Industrial Co., Ltd.
23. Heze Ever-Best International Trade Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Shandong
Heze International Trade and Developing Company)
24. Hongkong Golden Eagle Group Ltd.
25. Hongqiao International Logistics Co.
26. Intecs Logistics Service Co., Ltd.
27. IT Logistics Qingdao Branch
28. Jinan Solar Summit International Co., Ltd.
29. Jinan Yipin Corporation Ltd.
30. Jining De-Rain Trading Co., Ltd.
31. Jining Highton Trading Co., Ltd.
32. Jining Jiulong International Trading Co., Ltd.
33. Jining Tiankuang Trade Co., Ltd.
34. Jining Trans-High Trading Co., Ltd.
35. Jinxiang County Huaguang Food Import & Export Co., Ltd.
36. Jinxiang Dacheng Food Co., Ltd.
37. Jinxiang Dongyun Freezing Storage Co., Ltd. (a/k/a Jinxiang
Eastward Shipping Import and Export Limited Company)
38. Jinxiang Dongyun Import & Export Co., Ltd.
39. Jinxiang Fengsheng Import & Export Co., Ltd.
40. Jinxiang Grand Agricultural Co., Ltd.
41. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd.
42. Jinxiang Infarm Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd.
43. Jinxiang Meihua Garlic Produce Co., Ltd.
44. Jinxiang Shanyang Freezing Storage Co., Ltd.
45. Jinxiang Shenglong Trade Co., Ltd.
46. Jinxiang Tianheng Trade Co., Ltd.
47. Jinxiang Tianma Freezing Storage Co., Ltd.
48. Jinxiang Xian Baishite Trade Co., Ltd. (a/k/a Jinxiang Best
Trade Co., Ltd.)
49. Juye Homestead Fruits and Vegetables Co., Ltd.
50. Kingwin Industrial Co., Ltd.
51. Laiwu Fukai Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
52. Laiwu Jiahe Fruit and Vegatable Co., Ltd.
53. Laizhou Xubin Fruits and Vegetables
54. Linshu Dading Private Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.
55. Linyi City Hedong District Jiuli Foodstuff Co.
56. Linyi City Kangfa Foodstuff Drinkable Co., Ltd.
57. Linyi Katayama Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.
58. Linyi Tianqin Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
59. Ningjin Ruifeng Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
60. Qingdao Apex Shipping Co., Ltd.
61. Qingdao BNP Co., Ltd.
62. Qingdao Cherry Leather Garment Co., Ltd.
63. Qingdao Chongzhi International Transportation Co., Ltd.
64. Qingdao Everfresh Trading Co., Ltd.
65. Qingdao Liang He International Trade Co., Ltd.
66. Qingdao Lianghe International Trade Co., Ltd.
67. Qingdao Saturn International Trade Co., Ltd.
68. Qingdao Sino-World International Trading Co., Ltd.
69. Qingdao Winner Foods Co., Ltd.
70. Qingdao XinTian Feng Food Co., Ltd.
71. Qingdao Yuankang International
72. Qufu Dongbao Import & Export Trade Co., Ltd.
73. Rizhao Huasai Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
74. Samyoung America (Shanghai) Inc.
75. Shandong Chengshun Farm Produce Trading Co., Ltd.
76. Shandong Chenhe Intl Trading Co., Ltd.
77. Shandong China Bridge Imports
78. Shandong Dongsheng Eastsun Foods Co., Ltd.
79. Shandong Garlic Company
80. Shandong Longtai Fruits and Vegetables Co., Ltd.
81. Shandong Sanxing Food Co., Ltd.
82. Shandong Wonderland Organic Food Co., Ltd.
83. Shandong Xingda Foodstuffs Group Co., Ltd.
84. Shandong Yipin Agro (Group) Co., Ltd.
85. Shanghai Ever Rich Trade Company
86. Shanghai Goldenbridge International Co., Ltd.
87. Shanghai Great Harvest International Co., Ltd.
88. Shanghai LJ International Trading Co., Ltd.
89. Shanghai Medicines & Health Products Import/Export Co., Ltd.
90. Shanghai Yijia International Transportation Co., Ltd.
91. Shenzhen Fanhui Import & Export Co., Ltd.
92. Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., Ltd.
93. Shenzhen Xunong Trade Co., Ltd.
94. Sunny Import & Export Limited
95. Tangerine International Trading Co.
96. T&S International, LLC.
97. Taian Eastsun Foods Co., Ltd.
98. Taian Fook Huat Tong Kee Pte. Ltd.
99. Taian Solar Summit Food Co., Ltd.
100. Taiyan Ziyang Food Co., Ltd.
101. Tianjin Spiceshi Co., Ltd.
102. U.S. United Logistics (Ningbo) Inc.
103. V.T. Impex (Shandong) Limited
104. Weifang Chenglong Import & Export Co., Ltd.
[[Page 72629]]
105. Weifang He Lu Food Import & Export Co., Ltd.
106. Weifang Hong Qiao International Logistics Co., Ltd.
107. Weifang Jinbao Agricultural Equipment Co., Ltd.
108. Weifang Naike Foodstuffs Co., Ltd.
109. Weifang Shennong Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
110. Weihai Textile Group Import & Export Co., Ltd.
111. WSSF Corporation (Weifang)
112. Xiamen Huamin Import Export Company
113. Xiamen Keep Top Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd.
114. Xinjiang Top Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.
115. XuZhou Heiners Agricultural Co., Ltd.
116. Yishui Hengshun Food Co., Ltd.
117. You Shi Li International Trading Co., Ltd.
118. Zhangzhou Xiangcheng Rainbow Greenland Food Co., Ltd.
119. Zhengzhou Dadi Garlic Industry Co., Ltd.
120. Zhengzhou Huachao Industrial Co., Ltd.
121. Zhengzhou Xiwannian Food Co., Ltd.
122. Zhengzhou Xuri Import & Export Co., Ltd.
123. Zhengzhou Yuanli Trading Co., Ltd.
124. Zhong Lian Farming Product (Qingdao) Co., Ltd.
Appendix III--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
Preliminary Rescission of Review
Separate Rate Determination
Separate Rate for Non-Selected Companies
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
PRC-Wide Entity
[FR Doc. 2014-28688 Filed 12-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P