[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1541-1544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00210]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-73991; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2014-108]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Its Price List
To Eliminate Transaction Fees for Midpoint Passive Liquidity Orders
That Remove Liquidity From the Exchange and That are Designated With a
``Retail'' Modifier as Defined in Rule 13--Equities
January 6, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on December 22, 2014, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to eliminate
transaction fees for Midpoint Passive Liquidity (``MPL'') Orders that
remove liquidity from the Exchange and that are designated with a
``retail'' modifier as defined in Rule 13--Equities. The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee change effective January 2, 2015. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
[[Page 1542]]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to eliminate
transaction fees for MPL Orders that remove liquidity from the Exchange
and that are designated with a ``retail'' modifier as defined in Rule
13--Equities (``Rule 13''). The Exchange proposes to implement the fee
change effective January 2, 2015.
For securities priced $1.00 or greater, the Exchange currently
charges a fee of $0.0028 per share for all MPL Orders \4\ that remove
liquidity from the NYSE MKT. For non-ETP securities traded pursuant to
unlisted trading privileges (``UTP'') priced at $1.00 or greater, the
Exchange currently charges a fee of $0.0030 for all MPL Orders that
remove liquidity from the Exchange. For ETPs traded pursuant to UTP,
the Exchange currently charges a fee of $0.0029 for all MPL Orders that
remove liquidity from the Exchange. The Exchange proposes to eliminate
the fee for MPL Orders that remove liquidity from the Exchange that are
designated with a ``retail'' modifier as defined in Rule 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ MPL Order is defined in Rule 13 as an undisplayed limit
order that automatically executes at the mid-point of the protected
best bid or offer (``PBBO'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be eligible for the proposed pricing for MPL Orders, an MPL
Order would need to meet the requirements to be designated as
``retail'' pursuant to Rule 13. An order designated as ``retail'' under
Rule 13 is an agency or riskless principal order that meets the
criteria of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. Rule 5320.03
and that (1) originates from a natural person and (2) is submitted to
the Exchange by a member organization, provided that no change is made
to the terms of the order with respect to price or side of market and
the order does not originate from a trading algorithm or any other
computerized methodology.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ An order designated as ``retail'' under Rule 13 is separate
and distinct from a ``Retail Order'' within the Retail Liquidity
Program under Rule 107C. The proposed rule change solely concerns
orders designated as ``retail'' pursuant to Rule 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit an order with a ``retail'' modifier, a member or member
organization must submit an attestation, in a form prescribed by the
Exchange, that substantially all orders submitted as ``retail'' will
qualify as such. Further, Rule 13 requires a member organization to
have written policies and procedures reasonably designed to assure that
it will only designate orders as ``retail'' if all requirements are
met.\6\ In addition, a member organization would be required to
designate such MPL Order as ``retail'' pursuant to Rule 13.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Such written policies and procedures require the member
organization to (1) exercise due diligence before entering a
``retail'' order to assure that entry as a ``retail'' order is in
compliance with the applicable requirements, and (2) monitor whether
orders entered as ``retail'' orders meet the applicable
requirements. If a member organization represents ``retail'' orders
from another broker-dealer customer, the member organization's
supervisory procedures must be reasonably designed to assure that
the orders it receives from such broker-dealer customer that it
designates as ``retail'' orders meet the definition of a ``retail''
order. The member organization must (i) obtain an annual written
representation, in a form acceptable to the Exchange, from each
broker-dealer customer that sends it orders to be designated as
``retail'' orders that entry of such orders as ``retail'' orders
will be in compliance with the applicable requirements; and (ii)
monitor whether its broker-dealer customer's ``retail'' order flow
meets the applicable requirements.
\7\ Currently, a member organization may designate an order as
``retail'' either by means of a specific tag in the order entry
message, as with other order modifiers, or by designating a
particular member or member organization mnemonic used at the
Exchange as a ``retail mnemonic.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to retain the fee for MPL Orders that remove
liquidity from the Exchange but that are not designated with a
``retail'' modifier at the current rates. The proposed amended Price
List would distinguish MPL Orders that remove liquidity and that are
designated as ``retail'' under Rule 13, which would not be charged a
fee, from MPL Orders that remove liquidity and that are not designated
as ``retail'' under Rule 13, and which would continue to be charged the
existing fee for MPL Orders that take liquidity. The Exchange proposes
to make comparable amendments to the Price List relating to pricing
applicable to Floor broker executions of MPL Orders.
The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any problems that members and
member organizations would have in complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in
particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and
other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that removing a fee for MPL Orders that
remove liquidity from the Exchange and that are designated as
``retail'' is reasonable because it will encourage the submission of
orders that meet the requirements to be designated as ``retail'' to the
Exchange, thus enhancing order execution opportunities for all
participants, but specifically retail investors. The ``retail''
modifier under Rule 13 along with its pricing is designed to
incentivize the submission of additional retail order flow to a public
market like the Exchange.\10\ Moreover, the Exchange believes that
markets and price discovery optimally function through the interactions
of diverse flow types, and also believes that growth in internalization
has required differentiation of retail order flow from other order flow
types. As the Exchange has previously noted, a significant percentage
of the orders of individual investors are executed over-the-
counter.\11\ The Exchange accordingly further believes that the
proposed change is reasonable because it would contribute to
maintaining or increasing the proportion of retail flow in Exchange-
listed securities that are executed on a registered national securities
exchange, rather than executing in off-exchange venues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 72252 (May 27, 2014),
79 FR 31368 (June 2, 2014) (SR-NYSEMKT-2014-46) (introduction of
``retail'' modifier under Rule 13).
\11\ Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 71878 (April 4, 2014),
79 FR 19936 (April 10, 2014) (SR-NYSEMKT-2014-25); see also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-73702 (Nov. 28, 2014), 79 FR
72049, 72051 (Dec. 4, 2014) (order approving NASDAQ OMX BX Retail
Price Improvement Program and noting that most marketable retail
order flow is executed in the over-the-counter markets, pursuant to
bilateral agreements, without ever reaching a public exchange) (``BX
Retail Approval Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange notes that while the proposed price change
would treat retail order flow differently from order flow submitted by
other market participants, such segmentation would not be inconsistent
with Section 6(b)(5)
[[Page 1543]]
of the Act,\12\ which requires that the rules of an exchange are not
designed to permit unfair discrimination. The Commission has previously
recognized that the markets generally distinguish between retail
investors, whose orders are considered desirable by liquidity providers
because such retail investors are presumed on average to be less
informed about short-term price movements, and professional traders,
whose orders are presumed on average to be more informed.\13\ The
Commission has further recognized that, because of this distinction,
liquidity providers are generally inclined to offer price improvement
to less informed retail orders than to more informed professional
orders.\14\ The Exchange believes that the differentiation proposed
herein is not designed to permit unfair discrimination, but instead is
reasonably designed to attract retail flow to the Exchange, while
helping to ensure that retail investors benefit from the better price
that liquidity providers are willing to give their orders. The Exchange
believes that the proposed increase of retail order flow to the
Exchange might also create a desirable opportunity for institutional
investors to interact with retail order flow that they are not able to
reach currently. The Exchange therefore believes that the proposed
change would further promote a competitive process around retail
executions such that retail investors would receive better prices than
they currently do through bilateral internalization arrangements. The
Exchange believes that the transparency and competitiveness of the
proposed rule change on an exchange market would result in better
prices for retail investors.\15\ The proposed change is also equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because it would contribute to
investors' confidence in the fairness of their transactions and because
it would benefit all investors by increasing the liquidity pool and
potential for price-improving executions at the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\13\ See BX Retail Approval Order at 72051.
\14\ Id.
\15\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67347 (July
3, 2012), 77 FR 40673, 40680 (July 10, 2012) (SR-NYSEAmex-2011-84)
(order approving adoption of Retail Liquidity Program on a pilot
basis). The Exchange notes that other markets offer separate non-
tier and tiered pricing for retail orders, see NASDAQ Price List,
available at http://nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=PriceListTrading2, and EDGX Exchange Fee Schedule,
available at http://www.directedge.com/trading/EDGXFeeSchedule.aspx,
as well as retail price improvement pricing for ``Retail Orders''
that remove displayed liquidity or mid-point peg liquidity. See BATS
BYX Exchange Fee Schedule, available at http://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/regulation/rule_book/BATS-Exchanges_Fee_Schedules.pdf
[sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed change is also equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the ability to designate MPL Orders as
``retail'' is available equally to all similarly situated members and
member organizations that submit qualifying orders and satisfy the
other related, existing requirements.
The Exchange believes that it is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement regarding the
burden on competition.
For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\16\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, the Exchange believes that the proposed
change would increase competition among execution venues and encourage
additional execution opportunities on the Exchange. For the same
reasons, the proposed change also would not impose any burden on
competition among market participants. The Exchange believes that while
it is the first to offer orders with a ``retail'' modifier the ability
to take at the mid-point for free through MPL Orders, providing
significant price improvement, the proposed change also permits the
Exchange to compete with other markets, including NASDAQ, which does
not charge but provides a credit for designated Retail Orders that take
liquidity in Retail Liquidity Provider programs,\17\ as well as over-
the-counter trading that offers mid-point executions at low fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
\17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 70860 (November
13, 2013), 78 FR 69512 (November 19, 2013) (SR-NASDAQ-2013-138).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust
its fees and rebates to remain competitive with other exchanges and
with alternative trading systems that have been exempted from
compliance with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges.
Because competitors are free to modify their own fees and credits in
response, and because market participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited. As a result of all of these considerations, the
Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes will impair the
ability of member organizations or competing order execution venues to
maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \18\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \19\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \20\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-
[[Page 1544]]
NYSEMKT-2014-108 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2014-108. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the
hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be
available for inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and
on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2014-108 and should be submitted
on or before February 2, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00210 Filed 1-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P