[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15510-15515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06152]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234; FRL-9923-98-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS39
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal-
and Oil-Fired Electric Steam Generating Units
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
[[Page 15511]]
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On November 19, 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) proposed amending certain reporting requirements in the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired
Electric Steam Generating Units (Mercury and Air Toxics Standards
(MATS)) rule. This final rule amends the reporting requirements in the
MATS rule by temporarily requiring owners or operators of affected
sources to submit certain required emissions and compliance reports to
the EPA through the Emissions Collection and Monitoring Plan System
(ECMPS) Client Tool, and the rule temporarily suspends the requirement
for owners or operators of affected sources to submit certain reports
using the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI).
DATES: This final rule is effective on March 24, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234. All documents in the docket are
listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publically
available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials
are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in
hard copy at the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA WJC West Building,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air
Docket is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barrett Parker, Sector Policies
and Programs Division (D243-05), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-5635; fax number: (919)
541-3207; and email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Organization of This Document. The information in this preamble is
organized as follows:
I. Why is the EPA issuing a final rule?
II. Does this final rule apply to me?
III. What are the amendments made by this final rule?
IV. Public Comments and Responses
A. Support for the Proposed Approach
B. Opposition to the Proposed Approach
C. Other Comments
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. Why is the EPA issuing a final rule?
The EPA is finalizing its proposed rule with revisions, and this
final rule replaces the existing requirements that became effective on
January 5, 2015, pursuant to a direct final rule published on November
19, 2014. See 79 FR 68840 and 79 FR 68795. We also respond to comments
in this final rule. See 79 FR 68796.
II. Does this final rule apply to me?
Categories and entities potentially regulated by this final rule
include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of Regulated
Category NAICS Code\1\ Entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry....................... 221112 Fossil fuel-fired
electric steam
generating units.
Federal government \2\......... 221122 Fossil fuel-fired
electric steam
generating units owned
by the federal
government.
State/local/tribal government 221122 Fossil fuel-fired
\2\. electric steam
generating units owned
by states, tribes or
municipalities.
921150 Fossil fuel-fired
electric utility steam
generating units in
Indian country.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.
\2\ Federal, state or local government-owned and operated establishments
are classified according to the activity in which they are engaged.
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
final rule. To determine whether your facility would be regulated by
this final rule, you should examine the applicability criteria in 40
CFR 63.9981. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult either the air permitting
authority for the entity or your EPA regional representative as listed
in 40 CFR 63.13.
III. What are the amendments made by this final rule?
This final rule amends the reporting requirements in 40 CFR
63.10031(f) of the MATS rule at 40 CFR part 63, subpart UUUUU. The
final MATS rule required affected sources to submit certain MATS
emissions and compliance information electronically, using either the
CEDRI or the ECMPS Client Tool. The EPA developed these two systems
prior to the MATS rule for the electronic submittal of emissions data
from many source categories. CEDRI is currently used by owners or
operators of sources regulated under 40 CFR part 60 and 40 CFR part 63
to submit performance test reports and other air emissions reports.
ECMPS is used to report emissions data under the Clean Air Act title IV
Acid Rain Program and other programs that are required to continuously
monitor and report emissions according to 40 CFR part 75. These two
systems have enhanced the way source owners and operators report
emissions data to the EPA by providing a streamlined and standardized
electronic approach.
Subsequent to publication of the MATS rule, stakeholders commented
that we could improve the reporting efficiency of the MATS rule by
requiring
[[Page 15512]]
all data to be reported to one system instead of two. Stakeholders also
commented that one system could benefit the EPA and the public in the
review of data submitted by setting one consistent format for all data
reported through MATS. Further, because the vast majority of sources
covered under the MATS rule have been using the ECMPS Client Tool since
2009, the stakeholders have encouraged the EPA to consider
consolidating the electronic reporting under ECMPS.
We agree that requiring reporting to one system will increase the
efficiency of reporting and facilitate review of reported data. For
these reasons, the agency is beginning the process of consolidating the
submission of electronic reports required under the MATS rule to one
system--the ECMPS Client Tool. This final rule is the first step in the
process. The next step is for the EPA to create a detailed set of
reporting instructions and design, develop, beta-test and implement the
necessary modifications to the ECMPS Client Tool; however, the EPA
cannot complete the second step prior to April 16, 2015, the compliance
deadline for the MATS rule. Therefore, we are implementing a phased
approach to completing the change in the electronic reporting
requirements.
This final rulemaking completes the first step in the agency's plan
by removing the requirement to submit MATS compliance reports to CEDRI
and requiring source owners or operators to use the ECMPS Client Tool
to submit Portable Document Format (PDF) versions of the reports that
the current MATS rule requires to be submitted using CEDRI. As stated
above, this interim step is necessary because the ECMPS Client Tool is
not currently programmed to accept the reports that the MATS rule
required sources to submit to CEDRI. The specific reports that must be
submitted in PDF format include: Quarterly and annual performance stack
test reports; 30- (or 90-) boiler operating day mercury (Hg) Low
Emitting EGU (Electric Generating Unit) (LEE) test reports; Relative
Accuracy Test Audits (RATA) reports for sulfur dioxide, hydrogen
chloride, hydrogen fluoride, and Hg monitors; Relative Calibration
Audit (RCA) and Relative Response Audit (RRA) reports for particulate
matter (PM) continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS); 30-boiler
operating day rolling average reports for PM CEMS, PM continuous
parameter monitoring system (CPMS), and approved hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) metals CEMS; and semiannual compliance reports.
Reports for the performance stack tests, Hg LEE tests, RATAs, RRAs and
RCAs typically include a description of the source, the test date(s), a
list of attendees, a test protocol, a summary of results, raw field
data, and example calculations, and, depending on the method(s) used,
may also include the results of sample analyses, quality-assurance
information (e.g., leak, bias and drift checks), and instrument
calibrations and calibration gas certificates. This final rule does not
alter the due dates for any report submittals contained in the final
MATS rule. See 40 CFR part 63, subpart UUUUU.
The EPA recognized that submitting electronic PDF reports is not as
desirable as reporting the data in extensible markup language (XML)
format, because the information in a PDF report cannot easily be
extracted and put in a database format. In view of this, we plan to
promulgate an additional data reporting revision to the MATS rule in
the second part of our phased approach. In this second part, we plan to
develop another rulemaking that requires affected source owners or
operators to submit the data elements required in the rule in a
structured XML format using the ECMPS Client Tool, which is already in
use. The second part of our phased approach will complete the process
of conversion of the electronic reporting of data using the ECMPS
Client Tool, and the MATS rule will be revised to specify all of the
required XML data elements for each type of report. We also plan to
develop a detailed set of reporting instructions for each report and to
modify ECMPS accordingly, in order to be able to receive and process
the data submitted.
In the event we are unable to finalize the rulemaking for the
second part of our phased approach for electronic reporting conversion
by April 16, 2017, the reporting requirements established in this final
rule will revert automatically to the original requirements set forth
in the final MATS rulemaking published on February 16, 2012 (77 FR
9303). This trigger is necessary to ensure that the data submitted in
the future is consistent with the database accessibility that is
associated with information reported in structured XML formats even if
the second rulemaking cannot be finalized. Accordingly, this rulemaking
includes a date of April 16, 2017, to complete the second part of our
phased approach for electronic reporting conversion to the ECMPS Client
Tool. The EPA intends to revoke this requirement once the final
conversion to the ECMPS Client Tool is complete.
IV. Public Comments and Responses
The direct final and parallel proposed rules received comments from
nine persons--two members of the public, one state government
representative, four EGU owners or operators and two EGU industry
representatives.
A. Support for the Proposed Approach
Most commenters expressed support for the planned two phased
approach for merging the electronic reporting systems, as well as the
revisions to allow temporary submission of MATS rule emissions and
compliance reports through the ECMPS Client Tool and suspension of
mandatory submission of certain reports using the CEDRI. Commenters
recognized the benefits afforded by the proposed approach, noting that
through the use of the transition period, the agency will be able to
obtain the necessary information to assure compliance while
simultaneously developing final reporting formats and infrastructure
for XML reporting. Commenters agree that consolidating all reporting
requirements through one system will streamline and simplify
requirements, making reporting more efficient and user-friendly,
improve the quality of reported emissions data and enable the agency to
track compliance effectively. We reviewed and considered these comments
and are finalizing the proposed rule, with minor revisions, to
implement the first part of our phased approach to merge all MATS rule
electronic reporting into the ECMPS Client Tool.
B. Opposition to the Proposed Approach
One commenter, a state government representative, opposed the
provisions of the proposed rule on two grounds: (1) The commenter
alleges the rule did not contain a requirement for EGU owners or
operators to submit full stack test reports; and (2) the commenter
indicates that it is improper to include a temporary suspension of the
requirement to use the electronic reporting tool (ERT) in preparing and
submitting stack test reports electronically.
With regard to the first item, the EPA maintains that the proposed
rule did include a requirement to submit complete performance test
reports during the interim period. In the proposed rule, the EPA stated
that stack test reports were required to be submitted during the
transition period: ``. . . (t)he specific reports that must be
submitted in PDF format include: Quarterly and annual performance stack
test reports . . .'' and ``. . . (r)eports for
[[Page 15513]]
the performance stack tests . . . typically include a description of
the source, the test date(s), a list of attendees, a test protocol, a
summary of results, raw field data, and example calculations, and,
depending on the method(s) used, may also include the results of sample
analyses, quality-assurance information (e.g., bias and drift checks),
instrument calibrations, and calibration gas certificates . . .'' (79
FR 68797). Other commenters agreed with the EPA's view of the
requirements while some believed that the requirement to submit the
test reports was only triggered upon request by the permitting
authority. To address any ambiguity on this issue, we are revising the
proposed rule and expressly requiring submission of emissions test
reports in the final rule.
With regard to the second item, we agree with the state
representative who commented that ``. . . (s)ubmittal of stack test
reports using ERT will allow (regulatory agencies) to independently
verify emissions calculations without having to re-enter data into
separate spreadsheets for re-calculation. ERT does the calculations and
can include all raw field and laboratory data as attachments . . . .''
These are among the reasons we mandated use of the ERT in both the
Information Collection Request and the MATS rule. Moreover, we agree
with the state representative that the ``. . . ERT can generate a full
PDF report that could be submitted to ECMPS with minimal effort . . .
.'' Indeed, we maintain that using the ``one-touch'' ERT feature to
create PDF versions of ERT-developed reports is the easiest way to meet
the interim electronic reporting requirements. However, at the present
time, the ERT does not support every MATS rule-related test method,
quality assurance approach or performance specification (PS), e.g., RCA
or RRA for PM CEMS and PS-11 for PM CEMS. Moreover, despite the
efficiency and ease of using the ``one-touch'' capability of the ERT
for the majority of MATS rule related test methods, quality assurance
approaches or PS, the ERT is not the sole means of developing PDF
versions of required reports. We considered requiring EGU owners or
operators to use the ERT's PDF creation feature for those reports that
can be developed through the current version of the ERT, but decided
against it for concerns that mandated use of two separate systems
during the interim period could be inefficient. While we believe many
EGU owners or operators will choose to use the ERT's cost-effective PDF
creation approach when possible, the rule does not require its use.
C. Other Comments
Even though comments on the proposed rule were to be limited to
issues directly associated with the electronic reporting changes
covered in 40 CFR 63.10031, commenters provided other comments. One
industry representative sought assurance that under the interim rule,
EGU owners or operators could use self-generated forms that included
relevant information per the aforementioned preamble language (79 CFR
68797), going on to assert that the only formatting specification is
that the reports be submitted in PDF format. The industry
representative expressed support for the proposed rule if those
assertions were correct. Commenters are correct, provided the necessary
information is included in a reasonable manner to allow review in the
electronic PDF versions of the reports.
Industry commenters also opposed the proposed rule to the extent it
required EGU owners or operators to use the ERT or CEDRI forms to
create the reports that will be submitted in PDF format, believing that
the rule revision would not provide any relief if their understanding
were correct. While we disagree with the commenters' views that using
the ERT or CEDRI to create PDF versions of reports or forms would not
provide relief, the rule neither requires nor prohibits during the
interim period preparation or submission of PDF reports or forms using
the ERT or CEDRI. We also note that the current versions of the ERT or
CEDRI do support notice of compliance (NOC) status reporting and the
majority of MATS rule-related test methods, quality assurance
approaches and PS, including all associated requisite calculations and
validations. For this reason, the commenters' concerns are misplaced.
Industry commenters also commented that some in the regulated
community might be confused over the reporting requirements and
misinterpret the provisions such that only PDF versions of ERT or CEDRI
generated reports or forms would be allowed for submission during the
interim period. Both commenters suggested we provide guidance, or, if
necessary, additional rule language after the first sentence of 40 CFR
63.10031(f)(6), to clarify the role of the ERT and CEDRI for data
submittal during the interim reporting phase. We considered these
comments and decided that such guidance or rule language is
unnecessary, as the ERT is not required to be used during the interim
period. With regard to reporting requirements during the transition
period, as mentioned earlier, the use of the CEDRI to submit reports to
our WebFIRE database will be suspended, the information that would have
been reported through the CEDRI must be submitted to the ECMPS in PDF
format and the deadline for submitting reports remains unchanged. We
will make the necessary adjustments to the ECMPS to enable the PDF
reports to be submitted. Note that submission of a PDF version of a
test report during this interim period is sufficient, provided that the
test report contains sufficient information to assess compliance and to
determine whether the testing has been done properly.
One commenter expressed concern with using the ERT and CEDRI in the
interim period because, in his view, those platforms are not capable of
accepting certain MATS reports, such as NOC status reports and 30-
boiler operating day averages from PM CEMS. Moreover, the commenter
believes using the ERT would be inefficient because, in his view, it
was not designed to handle MATS rule data, such as those from PS-11,
RCAs and RRAs. Finally, the commenter believes the usefulness of ERT
collected data is limited because, in his view, the ERT neither
performs the requisite calculations for quality assurance tests nor
validates test results in accordance with method acceptance criteria.
As stated above, the rule neither requires nor prohibits during the
interim period preparation or submission of PDF reports or forms using
the ERT or CEDRI. We also note that the current versions of the ERT or
CEDRI do support NOC status reporting and the majority of MATS rule
related test methods, quality assurance approaches and PS, including
all associated requisite calculations and validations. While not a part
of this rulemaking, we soon expect the ERT will be able to handle all
of the remaining MATS rule related test methods, quality assurance
approaches and PS, which will be important if the agency does not
complete the revisions to the ECMPS. In addition, we expect the ECMPS
Client Tool to be revised to accept all MATS rule related electronic
reporting during the second part of our phased approach such that the
ECMPS will be the sole means for providing MATS reports electronically.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
[[Page 15514]]
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new information collection burden
under the PRA. OMB has previously approved the information collection
activities contained in the existing regulations and has assigned OMB
control number 2060-0567. The agency believes this action does not
impose an information collection burden because it does not change the
information collection requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This
amendment does not create any new requirements or burdens, and no costs
are associated with this amendment. See 79 FR 68795 at 68798 (November
19, 2014).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes
no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the
private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. The final amendments impose no requirements on
tribal governments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This action does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed
by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income
or indigenous populations. This action does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or the environment. The final
amendments are either clarifications or alternate, temporary reporting
instructions which will neither increase nor decrease environmental
protection.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 9, 2015.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart UUUUU-National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Steam Generating Units
0
2. Section 63.10031 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the first sentence in each of the following paragraphs: (f)
introductory text, (f)(1), (2), and (4); and
0
b. Revising paragraphs (f)(5) and (6).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 63.10031 What reports must I submit and when?
* * * * *
(f) On or after April 16, 2017, within 60 days after the date of
completing each performance test, you must submit the performance test
reports required by this subpart to EPA's WebFIRE database by using the
Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is
accessed through EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (www.epa.gov/cdx). *
* *
(1) On or after April 16, 2017, within 60 days after the date of
completing each CEMS (SO2, PM, HCl, HF, and Hg) performance
evaluation test, as defined in Sec. 63.2 and required by this subpart,
you must submit the relative accuracy test audit (RATA) data (or, for
PM CEMS, RCA and RRA data) required by this subpart to EPA's WebFIRE
database by using CEDRI that is accessed through EPA's CDX
(www.epa.gov/cdx). * * *
(2) On or after April 16, 2017, for a PM CEMS, PM CPMS, or approved
alternative monitoring using a HAP metals CEMS, within 60 days after
the reporting periods ending on March 31st, June 30th, September 30th,
and December 31st, you must submit quarterly reports to EPA's WebFIRE
database by using the CEDRI that is accessed through EPA's CDX
(www.epa.gov/cdx). * * *
* * * * *
(4) On or after April 16, 2017, submit the compliance reports
required under paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section and the
notification of compliance status required under Sec. 63.10030(e) to
EPA's WebFIRE database by using the CEDRI that is accessed through
EPA's CDX (www.epa.gov/cdx). * * *
(5) All reports required by this subpart not subject to the
requirements
[[Page 15515]]
in paragraphs (f) introductory text and (f)(1) through (4) of this
section must be sent to the Administrator at the appropriate address
listed in Sec. 63.13. If acceptable to both the Administrator and the
owner or operator of an EGU, these reports may be submitted on
electronic media. The Administrator retains the right to require
submittal of reports subject to paragraphs (f) introductory text and
(f)(1) through (4) of this section in paper format.
(6) Prior to April 16, 2017, all reports subject to electronic
submittal in paragraphs (f) introductory text, (f)(1), (2), and (4)
shall be submitted to the EPA at the frequency specified in those
paragraphs in electronic portable document format (PDF) using the ECMPS
Client Tool. Each PDF version of a submitted report must include
sufficient information to assess compliance and to demonstrate that the
testing was done properly. The following data elements must be entered
into the ECMPS Client Tool at the time of submission of each PDF file:
(i) The facility name, physical address, mailing address (if
different from the physical address), and county;
(ii) The ORIS code (or equivalent ID number assigned by EPA's Clean
Air Markets Division (CAMD)) and the Facility Registry System (FRS) ID;
(iii) The EGU (or EGUs) to which the report applies. Report the EGU
IDs as they appear in the CAMD Business System;
(iv) If any of the EGUs in paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this section
share a common stack, indicate which EGUs share the stack. If emissions
data are monitored and reported at the common stack according to part
75 of this chapter, report the ID number of the common stack as it is
represented in the electronic monitoring plan required under Sec.
75.53 of this chapter;
(v) If any of the EGUs described in paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this
section are in an averaging plan under Sec. 63.10009, indicate which
EGUs are in the plan and whether it is a 30- or 90-day averaging plan;
(vi) The identification of each emission point to which the report
applies. An ``emission point'' is a point at which source effluent is
released to the atmosphere, and is either a dedicated stack that serves
one of the EGUs identified in paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this section or
a common stack that serves two or more of those EGUs. To identify an
emission point, associate it with the EGU or stack ID in the CAMD
Business system or the electronic monitoring plan (e.g., ``Unit 2
stack,'' ``common stack CS001,'' or ``multiple stack MS001'');
(vii) The rule citation (e.g., Sec. 63.10031(f)(1), Sec.
63.10031(f)(2), etc.) for which the report is showing compliance;
(viii) The pollutant(s) being addressed in the report;
(ix) The reporting period being covered by the report (if
applicable);
(x) The relevant test method that was performed for a performance
test (if applicable);
(xi) The date the performance test was conducted (if applicable);
and
(xii) The responsible official's name, title, and phone number.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-06152 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P