[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 158 (Monday, August 17, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49193-49196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20245]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 80
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0208; FRL-9931-95-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS64
Relaxation of the Federal Reid Vapor Pressure Gasoline Volatility
Standard for Mecklenburg and Gaston Counties, North Carolina
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a request from the state of North Carolina for the EPA to relax
the Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) standard applicable to gasoline
introduced into commerce from June 1 to September 15 of each year for
Mecklenburg and Gaston counties, North Carolina. Specifically, the EPA
is proposing to amend the regulations to allow the RVP standard for
Mecklenburg and Gaston counties to rise from 7.8 pounds per square inch
(psi) to 9.0 psi for gasoline. The EPA has preliminarily determined
that this change to the federal RVP regulation is consistent with the
applicable provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 16,
2015 unless a public hearing is requested by September 1, 2015. If the
EPA receives such a request, we will publish information related to the
timing and location of the hearing and a new deadline for public
comment.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2015-0208, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information you
[[Page 49194]]
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. If you need to
include CBI as part of your comment, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html for instructions. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make.
The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents
located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patty Klavon, Office of Transportation
and Air Quality, Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood
Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105; telephone number: (734) 214-4476;
fax number: (734) 214-4052; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The contents of this preamble are listed in
the following outline:
I. General Information
II. Public Participation
III. Background and Proposal
IV. Direct Final Rule
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
VI. Legal Authority
I. General Information
A. This Proposed Rule Is Published Parallel to a Direct Final Rule
In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register,
the EPA is making this revision as a direct final rule without prior
proposal because the EPA views this revision as noncontroversial and
anticipates no adverse comment. The rationale for this rulemaking is
described both in this proposal and in the direct final rule.
The regulatory text for this proposed rule is included in the
direct final rule, and parties should review that rule for the
regulatory text. If the EPA receives no adverse comment, the EPA will
not take further action on this proposed rule. If the EPA receives
adverse comment on this rule or any portion of this rule, the EPA will
withdraw the direct final rule or the portion of the rule that received
adverse comment. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on this rulemaking. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time.
B. Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this proposed rule are fuel
producers and distributors who do business in North Carolina.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAICS \1\
Examples of potentially regulated entities codes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum refineries......................................... 324110
Gasoline Marketers and Distributors.......................... 424710
424720
Gasoline Retail Stations..................................... 447110
Gasoline Transporters........................................ 484220
484230
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.
The above table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated
by this action. The table lists the types of entities of which the EPA
is aware that potentially could be affected by this proposed rule.
Other types of entities not listed on the table could also be affected.
To determine whether your organization could be affected by this
proposed rule, you should carefully examine the regulations in 40 CFR
80.27. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, call the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.
C. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
The statutory authority for this action is granted to the EPA by
Sections 211(h) and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended; 42 U.S.C.
7545(h) and 7601(a).
II. Public Participation
The EPA will not hold a public hearing on this matter unless a
request is received by the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble by September 1, 2015. If
the EPA receives such a request, we will publish information related to
the timing and location of the hearing and a new deadline for public
comment.
III. Background and Proposal
A. Summary of the Proposal
The EPA is proposing to approve a request from the state of North
Carolina to change the summertime RVP standard for Mecklenburg and
Gaston counties, North Carolina from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi by amending the
EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 80.27(a)(2). In a previous rulemaking, the
EPA approved a redesignation request and maintenance plan for the
Charlotte-Gastonia-Salisbury, North Carolina 2008 ozone area (``the
Charlotte area'') and a CAA section 110(l) non-interference
demonstration that relaxing the federal RVP requirement from 7.8 psi to
9.0 psi for gasoline sold from June 1 to September 15 of each year in
Mecklenburg and Gaston counties would not interfere with maintenance of
any NAAQS in the Charlotte area, including the 2008 ozone NAAQS, or
with any other applicable CAA requirement. Mecklenburg and Gaston
counties are part of the Charlotte area. For more information on North
Carolina's redesignation request and maintenance plan for the Charlotte
area, please refer to Docket ID. No. EPA-R04-OAR-2015-0275 for the
rulemaking that was signed on July 17, 2015.
The preamble for this rulemaking is organized as follows: Section
III.B. provides the history of the federal gasoline volatility
regulation. Section III.C. describes the policy regarding relaxation of
gasoline volatility standards in ozone nonattainment areas that are
redesignated as attainment areas. Section III.D. provides information
specific to North Carolina's request for Mecklenburg and Gaston
counties. Finally, Section IV. briefly discusses the associated direct
final rule.
B. History of the Gasoline Volatility Requirement
On August 19, 1987 (52 FR 31274), the EPA determined that gasoline
nationwide was becoming increasingly volatile, causing an increase in
evaporative emissions from gasoline-powered vehicles and equipment.
Evaporative emissions from gasoline, referred to as volatile organic
compounds (VOC), are precursors to the formation of tropospheric ozone
and contribute to the nation's ground-level ozone problem. Exposure to
ground-level ozone can reduce lung function, thereby aggravating asthma
and other respiratory conditions, increase susceptibility to
respiratory infection, and may contribute to premature death in people
with heart and lung disease.
The most common measure of fuel volatility that is useful in
evaluating gasoline evaporative emissions is RVP. Under CAA section
211(c), the EPA promulgated regulations on March 22, 1989 (54 FR 11868)
that set maximum limits for the RVP of gasoline sold during the
regulatory control periods that were established on a state-by-state
[[Page 49195]]
basis in the final rule. The regulatory control periods addressed the
portion of the year when peak ozone concentrations were expected. These
regulations constituted Phase I of a two-phase nationwide program,
which was designed to reduce the volatility of gasoline during the high
ozone season. On June 11, 1990 (55 FR 23658), the EPA promulgated more
stringent volatility controls as Phase II of the volatility control
program. These requirements established maximum RVP standards of 9.0
psi or 7.8 psi (depending on the state, the month, and the area's
initial ozone attainment designation with respect to the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS.)
The 1990 CAA Amendments established a new section 211(h) to address
fuel volatility. CAA section 211(h) requires the EPA to promulgate
regulations making it unlawful to sell, offer for sale, dispense,
supply, offer for supply, transport, or introduce into commerce
gasoline with an RVP level in excess of 9.0 psi during the high ozone
season. CAA section 211(h) also prohibits the EPA from establishing a
volatility standard more stringent than 9.0 psi in an attainment area,
except that the EPA may impose a lower (more stringent) standard in any
former ozone nonattainment area redesignated to attainment.
On December 12, 1991 (56 FR 64704), the EPA modified the Phase II
volatility regulations to be consistent with CAA section 211(h). The
modified regulations prohibited the sale of gasoline with an RVP above
9.0 psi in all areas designated attainment for ozone, effective January
13, 1992. For areas designated as nonattainment, the regulations
retained the original Phase II standards published on June 11, 1990 (55
FR 23658), which included the 7.8 psi ozone season limitation for
certain areas. As stated in the preamble to the Phase II volatility
controls and reiterated in the proposed change to the volatility
standards published in 1991, the EPA will rely on states to initiate
changes to their respective volatility programs. The EPA's policy for
approving such changes is described below in Section III.C.
The state of North Carolina has initiated this change by requesting
that the EPA relax the 7.8 psi gasoline RVP standard to 9.0 psi for
Mecklenburg and Gaston counties, which are subject to the 7.8 gasoline
RVP requirement during the summertime ozone season. Accordingly, the
state of North Carolina provided a technical demonstration showing that
relaxing the federal gasoline RVP requirements in the two counties from
7.8 psi to 9.0 psi would not interfere with maintenance of any NAAQS in
the Charlotte area, including the 2008 ozone NAAQS, or with any other
applicable CAA requirement.
C. The EPA's Policy Regarding Relaxation of Gasoline Volatility
Standards in Ozone Nonattainment Areas That Are Redesignated to
Attainment Areas
As stated in the preamble for the EPA's amended Phase II volatility
standards (56 FR 64706), any change in the gasoline volatility standard
for a nonattainment area that was subsequently redesignated as an
attainment area must be accomplished through a separate rulemaking that
revises the applicable standard for that area. Thus, for former 1-hour
ozone nonattainment areas where the EPA mandated a Phase II volatility
standard of 7.8 psi RVP in the December 12, 1991 rulemaking, the
federal 7.8 psi gasoline RVP requirement remains in effect, even after
such an area is redesignated to attainment, until a separate rulemaking
is completed that relaxes the federal gasoline RVP standard in that
area from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi.
As explained in the December 12, 1991 rulemaking, the EPA believes
that relaxation of an applicable gasoline RVP standard is best
accomplished in conjunction with the redesignation process. In order
for an ozone nonattainment area to be redesignated as an attainment
area, CAA section 107(d)(3) requires the state to make a showing,
pursuant to CAA section 175A, that the area is capable of maintaining
attainment for the ozone NAAQS for ten years. Depending on the area's
circumstances, this maintenance plan will either demonstrate that the
area is capable of maintaining attainment for ten years without the
more stringent volatility standard or that the more stringent
volatility standard may be necessary for the area to maintain its
attainment with the ozone NAAQS. Therefore, in the context of a request
for redesignation, the EPA will not relax the gasoline volatility
standard unless the state requests a relaxation and the maintenance
plan demonstrates to the satisfaction of the EPA that the area will
maintain attainment for ten years without the need for the more
stringent volatility standard.
North Carolina is requesting relaxation of the federal gasoline RVP
standard from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi for Mecklenburg and Gaston counties
concurrent with its request that the EPA approve a redesignation
request and maintenance plan for the Charlotte area for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS.
D. North Carolina's Request To Relax the Federal Gasoline RVP
Requirement for Mecklenburg and Gaston Counties
On March 11, 2015, the state of North Carolina, through the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR),
submitted a redesignation request and maintenance plan for the
Charlotte area, which was classified as Marginal for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. Mecklenburg and Gaston counties are part of the Charlotte area.
Additionally, the state submitted a CAA section 110(l) non-interference
demonstration that removal of the federal RVP requirement of 7.8 psi
for gasoline during the summertime ozone season in Mecklenburg and
Gaston counties would not interfere with maintenance of any NAAQS, or
with any other applicable CAA requirement. Specifically, the state
provided a technical demonstration showing that relaxing the federal
gasoline RVP requirement in the two counties from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi
would not interfere with maintenance of any NAAQS in the Charlotte
area, of which the two counties are part, including the 2008 ozone
NAAQS, or with any other applicable CAA requirement.
In a rulemaking that was signed on July 17, 2015, the EPA evaluated
and approved North Carolina's March 11, 2015 redesignation request and
maintenance plan for the Charlotte area. See Docket ID. No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2015-0275. In a separate rulemaking signed on July 17, 2015, the
EPA approved North Carolina's non-interference demonstration for
Mecklenburg and Gaston counties. See Docket ID. No. EPA-R04-OAR-2015-
0260.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On March 11, 2015, the NCDENR requested that the EPA
parallel process the approval of the submission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both rulemakings were subject to public notice-and-comment. The EPA
received two comments on the redesignation request and maintenance plan
rulemaking, and those comments were addressed in the final rule for
that rulemaking. The comments received can be found in the docket for
that rulemaking (Docket ID. No. EPA-R04-OAR-2015-0275). No comments
were received on the non-interference demonstration for Mecklenburg and
Gaston counties (Docket ID. No. EPA-R04-OAR-2015-0260).
In this action, the EPA is taking the second and final step in the
process by proposing to approve North Carolina's request to relax the
summertime ozone season gasoline RVP standard for Mecklenburg and
Gaston counties from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi. Specifically, the EPA
[[Page 49196]]
is proposing to amend the applicable gasoline RVP standard to allow the
gasoline RVP requirements to rise from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi provided at
40 CFR 80.27(a)(2) for the two counties. This proposal to approve North
Carolina's request to relax the summertime ozone season gasoline RVP
standard for Mecklenburg and Gaston counties from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi is
based on the previous approval of North Carolina's March 11, 2015
redesignation request and maintenance plan and non-interference
demonstration. It is also based on the fact that the Charlotte area is
currently in attainment for the both the 1997 ozone NAAQS and the 2008
ozone NAAQS.
IV. Direct Final Rule
A direct final rule that would make the same changes as those
proposed in this action appears in the Rules and Regulations section of
this Federal Register. The EPA is taking direct final action on these
revisions because the EPA views the revisions as noncontroversial and
anticipates no adverse comment. The EPA has explained the reasons for
the amendments in this proposal and in the direct final rule. If no
adverse comments are received, no further action will be taken on the
proposal, and the direct final rule will become effective as provided
in that action.
If the EPA receives adverse comments on the rule or any portion of
the rule, the EPA will withdraw the direct final rule or the portion of
the rule that received adverse comment. The EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register indicating which provisions are
being withdrawn. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period on the subsequent final action. Any
parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
The changes to the regulatory text proposed in this document are
identical to those for the direct final rule published in the Rules and
Regulations section of this Federal Register. For further information,
including the regulatory revisions, see the direct final rule published
in a separate part of this Federal Register.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
For a complete discussion of all the administrative requirements
applicable to this action, see the direct final rule in the Rules and
Regulations section of this Federal Register.
VI. Legal Authority
The statutory authority for this action is granted to the EPA by
Sections 211(h) and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended; 42 U.S.C.
7545(h) and 7601(a).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Fuel additives, Gasoline, Motor vehicle and
motor vehicle engines, Motor vehicle pollution, Penalties, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 5, 2015.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-20245 Filed 8-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P