[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 159 (Tuesday, August 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50026-50027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20301]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-464 and 731-TA-1160 (Review)]
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From China; Scheduling of
Expedited Five-Year Reviews
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of
expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to
determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing
duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from China would
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
DATES: Effective Date: August 4, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanna Lo (202-205-1888), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On August 4, 2015, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(80 FR 24976, May 1, 2015) of the subject five-year reviews was
adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was
inadequate. The Commission did not find any circumstances that would
warrant conducting full reviews.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission
determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section
751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and
rules
[[Page 50027]]
of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on
September 2, 2015, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will
be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission's rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are
due on or before September 8, 2015 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement
(which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the
reviews by September 8, 2015. However, should the Department of
Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results
of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce's final results is three business days
after the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments contain business
proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements
of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. Please
be aware that the Commission's rules with respect to filing have
changed. The most recent amendments took effect on July 25, 2014. See
79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014), and the revised Commission Handbook on E-
filing, available from the Commission's Web site at http://edis.usitc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has found the responses submitted by Insteel
Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and WMC
Steel, LLC to be individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
Issued: August 12, 2015.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-20301 Filed 8-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P