[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 241 (Wednesday, December 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78256-78257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31652]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-220, 50-410, and 72-1036; NRC-2015-0248]


Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, 
Units 1 and 2

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Finding of no significant impact with associated environmental 
assessment; final issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an 
environmental assessment (EA) and finding of no significant impact 
(FONSI) related to a request to amend Renewed Facility Operating 
License No. DPR-63, NPR-69 and Docket No. 72-1036, issued to Exelon 
Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, ``the licensee''), for operation of 
the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, including the 
general-licensed Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation 
(hereinafter ``NMP'' or ``the facility''), located in Oswego County, 
NY. The requested amendment would permit licensee security personnel to 
use certain firearms and ammunition feeding devices not previously 
permitted, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms 
laws or regulations that otherwise prohibit such actions.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0248 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0248. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact 
the individual(s) listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 
of this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The 
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this notice (if 
that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a 
document is referenced. The application for amendment for Nine Mile 
Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (NMP) dated August 14, 2013, was 
supplemented by letters dated September 10, 2013, May 14, 2014, and 
January 16, 2015 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML13228A265, ML13260A257, 
ML14139A342, and ML15020A100, respectively). Those letters containing 
SUNSI are being withheld from public disclosure.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda L. Mozafari, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2020, email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction

    The NRC is considering a request to amend Renewed Facility 
Operating License Nos. DPR-63, NPR-69, and Docket No. 72-1036, issued 
to Exelon for operation of NMP located in Oswego County, New York, in 
accordance with 10 CFR 50.90 of title 10 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (10 CFR). Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC has 
reviewed the requirements in 10 CFR 51.20(b) and 10 CFR 51.22(c) and 
determined that an EA is the appropriate form of environmental review. 
Based on the results of the EA, the NRC is issuing this final FONSI. 
The requested amendment would permit licensee security personnel to use 
certain firearms and ammunition feeding devices not previously 
permitted, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms 
laws or regulations that otherwise prohibit such actions.

[[Page 78257]]

    The NRC published a draft EA and FONSI on the proposed action for 
public comment in the Federal Register on October 29, 2015 (80 FR 
66588). No comments were received.

II. Environmental Assessment

Identification of the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would permit security personnel at NMP, in the 
performance of official duties, to transfer, receive, possess, 
transport, import, and use certain firearms and large capacity 
ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted to be owned or 
possessed, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms 
laws, or regulations, that otherwise prohibit such actions.
    The proposed action is in accordance with Exelon's application 
dated August 14, 2013, as supplemented by letters dated September 10, 
2013, May 14, 2014, and January 16, 2015.

The Need for the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would allow the transfer, receipt, possession, 
transportation, importation and use of those firearms and devices 
needed in the performance of official duties required for the 
protection of NMP and associated special nuclear material, consistent 
with the NMP NRC-approved security plan.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and 
concludes that the proposed action would only allow the use of those 
firearms and devices necessary to protect NMP and associated special 
nuclear material, consistent with the NMP NRC-approved security plan. 
Therefore, the proposed action would not significantly increase the 
probability or consequences of accidents. In addition, the proposed 
action would not change the types and the amounts of any effluents that 
may be released offsite. There would also be no significant increase in 
occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there would be no 
significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the 
proposed action.
    The proposed action would not impact land, air, or water resources, 
including biota. In addition, the proposed action would not result in 
any socioeconomic or environmental justice impacts or impacts to 
historic and cultural resources. Therefore, there would also be no 
significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the 
proposed action.
    Accordingly, the NRC concludes that the issuance of the requested 
amendment would not result in significant environmental impacts.
    Details of the NRC's evaluation will be included in a letter to the 
licensee.

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered 
denying the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). 
Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change in 
current environmental conditions at NMP.

Alternative Use of Resources

    The proposed action would not involve the use of any resources.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    The staff did not consult with any other Federal Agency or State of 
New York agencies regarding the environmental impact of the proposed 
action.

III. Finding of No Significant Impact

    The licensee has requested a license amendment to permit licensee 
security personnel, in the performance of official duties, to transfer, 
receive, possess, transport, import, and use certain firearms and large 
capacity ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted to be 
owned or possessed notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal 
firearms laws, or regulations that would otherwise prohibit such 
actions.
    On the basis of the information presented in this environmental 
assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposed action would not cause 
any significant environmental impact and would not have a significant 
effect on the quality of the human environment. In addition, the NRC 
has determined that an environmental impact statement is not necessary 
for the evaluation of this proposed action.
    Other than the licensee's letter dated August 14, 2013, there are 
no other environmental documents associated with this review.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of December 2015.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Travis L. Tate,
Chief, Plant Licensing Branch I-1, Division of Operating Reactor 
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2015-31652 Filed 12-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P