[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3636-3656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00470]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, and 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0510; FRL-9972-22-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS95
Revisions to Testing Regulations for Air Emission Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes corrections and updates to regulations
for source testing of emissions. The proposed rule includes corrections
to testing provisions that contain inaccuracies, updates to outdated
procedures, and approved alternative procedures that provide testers
enhanced flexibility. The revisions will improve the quality of data
but will not impose new substantive requirements on source owners or
operators.
DATES: Comments. Written comments must be received by March 27, 2018.
Public Hearing. The EPA will hold a public hearing on this rule if
requested. Requests for a hearing must be made by February 5, 2018.
Requests for a hearing should be made to Mrs. Lula H. Melton via email
at [email protected] or by phone at (919) 541-2910. If a hearing is
requested, it will be held on February 26, 2018 at EPA Headquarters,
William Jefferson Clinton East Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20004.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2016-0510 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, Cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed on the website, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, Room
3334, EPA WJC West Building, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number
for the EPA Docket Center is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Lula H. Melton, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division (E143-
02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711;
telephone number: (919) 541-2910; fax number: (919) 541-0516; email
address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The supplementary information in this preamble is organized as
follows:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. What action is the agency taking?
II. Background
III. Summary of Proposed Amendments
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
[[Page 3637]]
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 60
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (Subpart D) Part 60
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart Da) Part 60
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Db) Part 60
H. Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating
Units (Subpart Dc) Part 60
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is
Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20,
1994 (Subpart Ea) Part 60
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC) Part 60
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic
Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (Subpart QQQQ) Part 60
L. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
M. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
N. Method 5B of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
O. Method 5I of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
P. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
R. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
S. Method 22 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
T. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
U. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
W. Performance Specification 1 of Appendix B of Part 60
X. Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B of Part 60
Y. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60
Z. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60
AA. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60
BB. Performance Specification 18 of Appendix B of Part 60
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 63
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (Subpart NNN) Part 63
FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional
Boilers and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
(Subpart UUUUU) Part 63
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part 63
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act and 1 CFR
Part 51
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
The proposed amendments apply to industries that are subject to the
current provisions of parts 51, 60, and 63. We did not list all of the
specific affected industries or their North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) codes herein since there are many
affected sources in numerous NAICS categories. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult either the air permitting authority for the entity or
your EPA Regional representative as listed in 40 CFR 63.13.
B. What action is the agency taking?
This action makes corrections and revisions to source test methods,
performance specifications (PS), quality assurance/quality control (QA/
QC) procedures, and testing regulations. The corrections and revisions
consist primarily of typographical errors, updates to testing
procedures, and the addition of alternative equipment and methods the
Agency has deemed acceptable to use.
II. Background
The EPA catalogs errors and corrections, as well as necessary
revisions to test methods, PS, QA/QC procedures, and associated
regulations in 40 CFR parts 51, 60, and 63 and periodically updates and
revises these provisions. The most recent updates and revisions were
promulgated on August 30, 2016 (81 FR 59800). This proposed rule
addresses necessary corrections and revisions identified subsequent to
that final action, many of which were brought to our attention by
regulated sources and end-users, such as environmental consultants and
compliance professionals. These revisions will improve the quality of
data obtained and give source testers the flexibility to use newly-
approved alternative procedures.
III. Summary of Proposed Amendments
The following amendments are being proposed.
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 201A, in section 12.5, the denominator of equation 24
would be corrected.
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 204, in section 8.2, the statement regarding equation
204-2 would be corrected to ``The NEAR must be <=0.05.''
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 205, section 2.1.1 would be revised to allow the use of
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable
transfer standards to calibrate the gas dilution system because these
standards are widely available and provide the accuracy necessary to
perform the calibration. Section 2.1.1 would also be revised to require
testers to report the results of the calibration of the dilution system
to enable the regulatory authority to review this information.
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 60
In the General Provisions of part 60, section 60.17(h) would be
revised to add American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D6216-
12 to the list of incorporations by reference and to re-number the
remaining consensus standards that are incorporated by reference in
alpha-numeric order.
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (Subpart D) Part 60
In subpart D, the allowed filter temperature in section
60.46(b)(2)(i) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart Da) Part 60
In subpart Da, the allowed filter temperature in section 60.50Da
(b)(1)(ii)(A) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Subpart
Db) Part 60
In subpart Db, the allowed filter temperature in section
60.46b(d)(4) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
[[Page 3638]]
H. Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Dc) Part 60
In subpart Dc, the allowed filter temperature in section
60.45c(a)(5) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction Is Commenced After
December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994 (Subpart Ea) Part
60
In subpart Ea, the allowed filter temperature in section
60.58a(b)(3) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC) Part 60
In subpart CC, the allowed filter temperature in section 60.293(f)
would be revised from 120 14 [deg]C to 120 5
[deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable particulate
matter (PM) measurements. The allowed filter temperature in section
60.296(d)(2) would be revised from 177 14 [deg]C to 177
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and
Forced-Air Furnaces Part 60
In subpart QQQQ, in Method 28WHH, in section 13.5.1, equation 8
would be corrected.
L. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
In Method 2B, in section 12.1, the definition of ambient carbon
dioxide concentration would be revised because the global monthly mean
(CO2)a concentration varies over time. Also, a
website link would be added to the definition.
M. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
The allowed filter temperature in Method 5, sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2,
6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7, and 8.5 would be revised from 120 14
[deg]C to 120 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of
the filterable PM measurements. Section 6.1.1.9 would be revised to
allow the use of a single temperature sensor in lieu of two temperature
sensors on the dry gas meter as allowed by Technical Information
Document 19 (TID-19) and the approved broadly applicable alternative,
ALT-117 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc).
N. Method 5B of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
The allowed filter temperature in Method 5B, sections 2.0, 6.1, and
8.2 would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM
measurements. Section 11.0 would be revised to replace the reference to
Method 5, section 11.0 with specific analytical procedures and to
report the results using Figure 5B-1 for complete data review. Section
17.0 would be revised to delete the word ``Reserved'' from the title,
and Figure 5B-1 (Analytical Data Sheet) would be added.
O. Method 5I of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In Method 5I, sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2 would be revised to tighten
the allowed filter temperature from 120 14 [deg]C to 120
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
P. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 7, sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 reference erroneous sections;
the correct sections would be inserted.
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 8, sections 6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 would be renumbered
to 6.1.1.2 through 6.1.1.5; a new section 6.1.1.1 would be added to
clarify the requirements that apply to the probe nozzle; and Figure 8-1
(Sulfuric Acid Sampling Train) would be corrected.
R. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
In Method 18, in section 13.1, the erroneous paragraph (c)
designation would be re-designated as (b).
S. Method 22 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
In Method 22, sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 would be revised to allow
digital photography to be used for a subset of the recordkeeping
requirements. Section 11.2.3 would be added to allow digital
photographic records. Note that ALT-109 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc)
is the associated broadly applicable alternative that allows the use of
digital photographs for specific recordkeeping requirements.
T. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
In Method 26, section 6.2.2 would be revised to allow the use of
glass sample storage containers as an option to allow flexibility and
to be consistent with Method 26A.
U. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
In Method 26A, section 6.2.1 would be revised to remove the
language regarding sample storage containers. We have determined that
high-density polyethylene is an acceptable material for sample storage
containers in addition to the currently allowed glass. Therefore, we
would allow both high-density polyethylene and glass in a new section
6.2.4.
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
In Test Method 28WHH, equation 8 in section 13.5.1 would be
corrected.
W. Performance Specification 1 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 1, references to ASTM D6216-98 (in
sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1, 8.1(1), 8.1(3)(ii), 8.2(1), 8.2(2), 8.2(3),
9.0, 12.1, 13.1, 13.2, and 16.0 reference 8. will be replaced with ASTM
D6216-12. Note: If the initial certification of the continuous opacity
monitoring system (COMS) has already occurred using D6216-98, D6216-03,
or D6216-07, it will not be necessary to recertify using D6216-12.
X. Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 2, section 13.2 would be replaced with
a table that indicates the relative accuracy performance
specifications.
Y. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 3, the two sentences in section 12.0
that read, ``Calculate the arithmetic difference between the RM and the
CEMS output for each run. The average difference of the nine (or more)
data sets constitute the RA.'' would be deleted; these two sentences
are no longer necessary since equations 3-1 and 3-2 would be moved from
section 13.2 to section 12.0.
Z. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 11, section 13.1, the word ``average''
erroneously exists in the second sentence and would be deleted.
AA. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 15, section 13.0 would be added as
``Method Performance (Reserved).''
BB. Performance Specification 18 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 18, in section 11.8.7, the last
sentence would
[[Page 3639]]
be revised to clarify the duration of the drift check. In Table 1, the
erroneous acronym ``NO2'' would be replaced with ``NO.'' In
the appendix of Performance Specification 18, the inadvertently omitted
reserved section 12.0 would be added.
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
In Procedure 1, in section 5.1.2 (1), the sentence immediately
following the table that reads, ``Challenge the CEMS three times at
each audit point, and use the average of the three responses in
determining accuracy.'' would be replaced with, ``Inject each of the
audit gases, three times each for a total of six injections. Inject the
gases in such a manner that the entire CEMS is challenged. Do not
inject the same gas concentration twice in succession.'' In section
5.1.2 (3), the reference to EPA's traceability protocol for gaseous
calibration standards would be updated, and the language regarding the
use of EPA Method 205 for dilution of audit gases would be clarified.
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 63
Sections 63.7(g)(2), 63.7(g)(2)(v), and 63.8(e)(5)(i) of the
General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63 would be revised to require
the reporting of specific test data for continuous monitoring system
performance evaluation tests and ongoing QA tests. These data elements
would be required regardless of the format of the report, i.e.,
electronic or paper. These modifications will ensure that performance
evaluation and quality assurance test reporting include all data
necessary for the compliance authority to assess and assure the quality
of the reported data and that the reported information describes and
identifies the specific unit covered by the evaluation test report.
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (Subpart NNN) Part 63
In subpart NNN, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
63.1385(a)(5) would be revised from 120 14 [deg]C to 120
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63
In Table 6 of subpart DDDDD, row 1.f. would be revised to allow the
use of EPA SW-846-7471B (for liquid samples) in addition to EPA SW-846-
7470A for measuring mercury to allow flexibility.
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
(Subpart UUUUU) Part 63
In subpart UUUUU, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to
160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the
filterable PM measurements. In Table 5, Method 5I would be allowed as a
test method option because Method 5I is designed for low PM
application.
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 303, section 12.4, equation 303-3 would be corrected by
inserting ``where y = '' in front of the equation.
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 308, deionized distilled water would replace the aqueous
n-proponal solution; the affected sections are 2.0, 7.2.2, 7.2.3.3, and
11.3.2. Section 7.2.2, which defines the aqueous n-proponal solution,
would be removed. Section 8.1.2 would be revised to require a leak
check prior to the sampling run (in addition to after the sampling run)
for QA purposes; requiring a leak check prior to the sampling run would
potentially save time and money. In section 9.1, methanol spike
recovery check would be added as a QC measure in Table 9.1. In section
12.1, variables used in equations 308-4 and 308-5 would be added and
section 12.5, which includes equations 308-4 and 308-5, would be added.
In section 13.0, the title ``Reserved'' would be replaced with ``Method
Performance'' and QA requirements would be added to be consistent with
other methods.
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
In section 8.2.2.4, the denominator in equation 2 would be
corrected from PSS to PS. In section 9.2.3, the
word ``where'' in the statement ``Calculate the dilution ratio using
the tracer gas as follows: where:'' would be deleted. Also in section
9.2.3, ``dir'' on the definition of spike is inadvertently
superscripted and would be subscripted.
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 323, section 12.9, the denominator in equation 323-8
would be corrected.
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 325A, section 8.2.1.3 would be revised to clarify that
only one extra sampling site is required near known sources of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) when the source is within 50 meters of the
boundary and the source is located between two monitors. The label
under Figure 8.1 would be corrected from Refinery (20% angle) to
Refinery (20[deg] angle). Section 8.2.3.2 would be revised to include
facilities with a monitoring perimeter length equal to 7,315 meters
(24,000 feet). Section 8.2.3.3 would be added to provide clarification
and an equivalent procedure in Option 2 (linear distance between sites)
for site locations that parallel section 8.2.2.2.4 in Option 1 (radial
distance between sites).
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 325B, section 9.3.2 would be revised to correct an error
in the number of field blank samples required for a sampling period and
to provide consistency with the sample analysis required in Method
325B. In sections 9.13 and 11.3.2.5, the erroneous reference to section
10.6.3 would be corrected to 10.0. Also in section 11.3.2.5, the
erroneous reference to section 10.9.5 would be corrected to 9.13.
Section 12.2.2 would be revised to correct the calculation of target
compound concentrations at standard conditions. Sections 12.2.3 and
12.2.4 would be deleted because the equations for target concentrations
are incorrect. Table 17-1 would be revised to add inadvertently omitted
QC criteria from section 9.3.3.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and is, therefore, not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is expected to be an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. This proposed rule is expected to provide meaningful burden
reduction by improving data quality and providing source testers the
flexibility to use newly-approved alternative procedures.
[[Page 3640]]
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. The amendments being proposed in this action to the test
methods, performance specifications, and testing regulations do not
substantively revise the existing information collection requirements
but rather only make corrections and minor updates to existing testing
methodology. In addition, the proposed amendments clarify performance
testing requirements.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This proposed rule will not impose
emission measurement requirements beyond those specified in the current
regulations, nor does it change any emission standard. We have,
therefore, concluded that this action will have no net regulatory
burden for all directly regulated small entities.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action would correct and update existing
testing regulations. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act and 1 CFR Part 51
This action involves technical standards. The EPA proposes to use
ASTM D6216-12 for continuous opacity monitors in Performance
Specification 1. The ASTM D6216-12 standard covers the procedure for
certifying continuous opacity monitors and includes design and
performance specifications, test procedures, and QA requirements to
ensure that continuous opacity monitors meet minimum design and
calibration requirements, necessary in part, for accurate opacity
monitoring measurements in regulatory environmental opacity monitoring
applications subject to 10 percent or higher opacity standards.
The ASTM D6216-12 standard was developed and adopted by the
American Society for Testing and Materials. The standard may be
obtained from http://www.astm.org or from the ASTM at 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action is not subject to Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an
environmental health or safety standard. This action would correct and
update existing testing regulations.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 51
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Performance
specifications, Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Performance specifications, Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Performance
specifications, Test methods and procedures.
Dated: December 11, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency proposes to amend title 40, chapter I of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 51--REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
0
2. Amend appendix M to part 51 as follows:
0
a. Revise section 12.5, equation 24, in Method 201A.
0
b. Revise the last sentence in section 8.2 in Method 204.
0
c. Revise section 2.1.1 in Method 205.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix M to Part 51--Recommended Test Methods for State
Implementation Plans
* * * * *
Method 201A--Determination of PM10 and PM2.5
Emissions From Stationary Sources (Constant Sampling Rate Procedure)
* * * * *
12.5 Equations. Use the following equations to complete the
calculations required in this test method.
* * * * *
Sampling Dwell Time at Each Point. Ntp is the total
number of traverse points. You must use the preliminary velocity
traverse data.
[[Page 3641]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.000
* * * * *
Method 204--Criteria for and Verification of a Permanent or Temporary
Total Enclosure
* * * * *
8.2 * * *
The NEAR must be <=0.05.
* * * * *
Method 205--Verification of Gas Dilution Systems for Field Instrument
Calibrations
* * * * *
2.1.1 The gas dilution system shall be recalibrated once per
calendar year using NIST-traceable flow standards with an
uncertainty <=0.25 percent. You shall report the results of the
calibration by the person or manufacturer who carried out the
calibration whenever the dilution system is used, listing the date
of the most recent calibration, the due date for the next
calibration, calibration point, reference flow device (ID, S/N), and
acceptance criteria. Follow the manufacturer's instructions for the
operation and use of the gas dilution system. A copy of the
manufacturer's instructions for the operation of the instrument, as
well as the most recent calibration documentation shall be made
available for inspection at the test site.
* * * * *
PART 60--STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES
0
3. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
4. In Sec. 60.17:
0
a. Redesignate paragraphs (h)(177) through (h)(209) as (h)(178) through
(h)(210).
0
b. Add new paragraph (h)(177).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 60.17 Incorporations by reference.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(177) ASTM D6216-12, Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications, IBR approved for appendix B to part 60: Performance
Specification 1.
* * * * *
Subpart D--Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam
Generators
0
5. Revise Sec. 60.46(b)(2)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.46 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The sampling time and sample volume for each run shall be at
least 60 minutes and 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The probe and filter holder
heating systems in the sampling train shall be set to provide an
average gas temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
Subpart Da--Standards of Performance for Electric Utility Steam
Generating Units
0
6. Revise Sec. 60.50Da (b)(1)(ii)(A) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.50Da Compliance determination procedures and methods.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) The sampling time and sample volume for each run shall be at
least 120 minutes and 1.70 dscm (60 dscf). The probe and filter holder
heating system in the sampling train may be set to provide an average
gas temperature of no greater than 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
Subpart Db--Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-
Institutional Steam Generating Units
0
7. Revise Sec. 60.46b (d)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.46b Compliance and performance test methods and procedures
for particulate matter and nitrogen oxides.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) For Method 5 of appendix A of this part, the temperature of the
sample gas in the probe and filter holder is monitored and is
maintained at 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
Subpart Dc--Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-
Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
0
8. Revise Sec. 60.45c(a)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.45c Compliance and performance test methods and procedures
for particulate matter.
(a) * * *
(5) For Method 5 or 5B of appendix A of this part, the temperature
of the sample gas in the probe and filter holder shall be monitored and
maintained at 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
Subpart Ea--Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors
for Which Construction Is Commenced After December 20, 1989 and On
or Before September 20, 1994
0
9. Revise Sec. 60.58a(b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.58a Compliance and performance testing.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Method 5 shall be used for determining compliance with the
particulate matter emission limit. The minimum sample volume shall be
1.7 cubic meters (60 cubic feet). The probe and filter holder heating
systems in the sample train shall be set to provide a gas temperature
of 160[deg] 5 [deg]C (320[deg] 9[emsp14][deg]F). An oxygen or carbon dioxide measurement shall
be obtained simultaneously with each Method 5 run.
* * * * *
Subpart CC--Standards of Performance for Glass Manufacturing Plants
0
10. Revise Sec. 60.293(f) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.293 Standards for particulate matter from glass melting
furnace with modified-processes.
* * * * *
(f) Test methods and procedures as specified in Sec. 60.296 shall
be used to determine compliance with this section except that to
determine compliance for any glass melting furnace using modified
processes and fired with either a gaseous fuel or a liquid fuel
containing less than 0.50 weight percent sulfur, Method 5 shall be used
with the probe and filter holder heating system in the sampling train
set to provide a gas temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248
9[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
0
11. Revise Sec. 60.296(d)(2) to read as follows:
[[Page 3642]]
Sec. 60.296 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Method 5 shall be used to determine the particulate matter
concentration (cs) and volumetric flow rate (Qsd)
of the effluent gas. The sampling time and sample volume for each run
shall be at least 60 minutes and 0.90 dscm (31.8 dscf). The probe and
filter holder heating system may be set to provide a gas temperature no
greater than 177 5 [deg]C (350 9[emsp14][deg]F), except under the conditions specified in Sec.
60.293(e).
* * * * *
0
12. Revise ``(CO2)a'' in section 12.1 in Method
2B of appendix A-1 to part 60 to read as follows:
Appendix A-1 to Part 60--Test Methods 1 Through 2F
* * * * *
Method 2B--Determination of Exhaust Gas Volume Flow Rate From Gasoline
Vapor Incinerators
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature.
* * * * *
(CO2)a = Ambient carbon dioxide concentration,
ppm (if not measured during the test period, may be assumed to equal
the global monthly mean CO2 concentration posted at
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html#global_data).
* * * * *
0
13. In appendix A-3 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7, 6.1.1.9, and 8.5 in
Method 5.
0
b. Revise sections 2.0, 6.1, 8.2, and 11.0 in Method 5B.
0
c. Add section 17.0 in Method 5B.
0
d. Revise sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2 in Method 5I.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix A-3 to Part 60--Test Methods 4 Through 5I
* * * * *
Method 5--Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
2.0 Summary of Method. Particulate matter is withdrawn
isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter
maintained at a temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F) or such other temperature as specified by an
applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator
for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any
material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is
determined gravimetrically after the removal of uncombined water.
* * * * *
6.1.1.2 Probe Liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass tubing with a
heating system capable of maintaining a probe gas temperature during
sampling of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F), or
such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the
standards or as approved by the Administrator for a particular
application. Since the actual temperature at the outlet of the probe
is not usually monitored during sampling, probes constructed
according to APTD-0581 and utilizing the calibration curves of APTD-
0576 (or calibrated according to the procedure outlined in APTD-
0576) will be considered acceptable. Either borosilicate or quartz
glass probe liners may be used for stack temperatures up to about
480 [deg]C (900 [deg]F); quartz glass liners shall be used for
temperatures between 480 and 900 [deg]C (900 and 1,650 [deg]F). Both
types of liners may be used at higher temperatures than specified
for short periods of time, subject to the approval of the
Administrator. The softening temperature for borosilicate glass is
820 [deg]C (1500 [deg]F), and for quartz glass it is 1500 [deg]C
(2700 [deg]F). Whenever practical, every effort should be made to
use borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners. Alternatively, metal
liners (e.g., 316 stainless steel, Incoloy 825 or other corrosion
resistant metals) made of seamless tubing may be used, subject to
the approval of the Administrator.
* * * * *
6.1.1.6 Filter Heating System. Any heating system capable of
monitoring and maintaining temperature around the filter shall be
used to ensure the sample gas temperature exiting the filter of 120
5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F) during sampling or
such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the
standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular
application. The monitoring and regulation of the temperature around
the filter may be done with the filter temperature sensor or another
temperature sensor.
6.1.1.7 Filter Temperature Sensor. A temperature sensor capable
of measuring temperature to within 3 [deg]C (5.4 [deg]F)
shall be installed so that the sensing tip of the temperature sensor
is in direct contact with the sample gas exiting the filter. The
sensing tip of the sensor may be encased in glass, Teflon, or metal
and must protrude at least \1/2\ in. into the sample gas exiting the
filter. The filter temperature sensor must be monitored and recorded
during sampling to ensure a sample gas temperature exiting the
filter of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F), or
such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the
standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular
application.
* * * * *
6.1.1.9 Metering System. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump,
calibrated temperature sensors, dry gas meter (DGM) capable of
measuring volume to within 2 percent, and related equipment, as
shown in Figure 5-1. Other metering systems capable of maintaining
sampling rates within 10 percent of isokinetic and of determining
sample volumes to within 2 percent may be used, subject to the
approval of the Administrator. When the metering system is used in
conjunction with a pitot tube, the system shall allow periodic
checks of isokinetic rates. The average DGM temperature for use in
the calculations of Section 12.0 may be obtained by averaging the
two temperature sensors located at the inlet and outlet of the DGM
as shown in Figure 5-3 or alternatively from a single temperature
sensor located at the immediate outlet of the DGM or the plenum of
the DGM.
* * * * *
8.5 Sampling Train Operation. During the sampling run, maintain
an isokinetic sampling rate (within 10 percent of true isokinetic
unless otherwise specified by the Administrator) and a sample gas
temperature through the filter of 120 5 [deg]C (248
9 [deg]F) or such other temperature as specified by an
applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the
Administrator. Note: After startup of the sampling system, it may
take several minutes to equilibrate the system and temperature
reading to within the required temperature threshold.
* * * * *
Method 5B--Determination of Nonsulfuric Acid Particulate Matter
Emissions From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.0 Summary of Method
Particulate matter is withdrawn isokinetically from the source
and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature of
160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F). The collected
sample is then heated in an oven at 160 [deg]C (320 [deg]F) for 6
hours to volatilize any condensed sulfuric acid that may have been
collected, and the nonsulfuric acid particulate mass is determined
gravimetrically.
* * * * *
6.1 Sample Collection.
The probe liner heating system and filter heating system must be
capable of maintaining a sample gas temperature of 160 5
[deg]C (320 9 [deg]F).
* * * * *
8.2 Probe and Filter Temperatures.
Maintain the probe outlet and filter temperatures at 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F). Note: After start-up of
the sampling system, it may take several minutes to equilibrate the
system and temperature reading to within the required temperature
threshold.
* * * * *
11.0 Analytical Procedure
11.1 Record and report the data required on a sheet such as the
one shown in Figure 5B-1.
11.2 Handle each sample container as follows:
11.2.1 Container No. 1. Leave the contents in the shipping
container or transfer the filter and any loose PM from the sample
container to a tared glass weighing dish. Oven dry the filter sample
at a temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320 9
[deg]F) for 6 hours. Cool in a desiccator for 2 hours, and weigh to
constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg. For the
purposes of this section, the term ``constant weight'' means a
difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total weight less
tare weight, whichever is greater, between two consecutive
weighings, with no less than 6 hours of desiccation time between
weighings.
11.2.2 Container No. 2. Note the level of liquid in the
container, and confirm on the
[[Page 3643]]
analysis sheet whether leakage occurred during transport. If a
noticeable amount of leakage has occurred, either void the sample or
use methods, subject to the approval of the Administrator, to
correct the final results. Measure the liquid in this container
either volumetrically to 1 ml or gravimetrically to
0.5 g. Transfer the contents to a tared 250 ml beaker,
and evaporate to dryness at ambient temperature and pressure. Then
oven dry the probe sample at a temperature of 160 5
[deg]C (320 9 [deg]F) for 6 hours. Cool in a desiccator
for 2 hours, and weigh to constant weight. Report the results to the
nearest 0.1 mg.
11.2.3 Container No. 3. Weigh the spent silica gel (or silica
gel plus impinger) to the nearest 0.5 g using a balance. This step
may be conducted in the field.
11.2.4 Acetone Blank Container. Measure the acetone in this
container either volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer the
acetone to a tared 250 ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at
ambient temperature and pressure. Desiccate for 24 hours, and weigh
to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Note: The contents of Container No. 2 as well as the acetone
blank container may be evaporated at temperatures higher than
ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated temperature, the
temperature must be below the boiling point of the solvent; also, to
prevent ``bumping,'' the evaporation process must be closely
supervised, and the contents of the beaker must be swirled
occasionally to maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care, as
acetone is highly flammable and has a low flash point.
* * * * *
17.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and Validation Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight of particulate collected, mg
Container number -----------------------------------------------
Final weight Tare weight Weight gain
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.......................................................................................................
2.......................................................................................................
Total:..................................................................................................
Less acetone blank......................................................................................
Weight of particulate matter............................................................................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume of liquid water
collected
-------------------------------
Impinger Silica gel
volume, ml weight, g
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final...................................................................................................................
Initial.................................................................................................................
Liquid collected........................................................................................................
Total volume collected.................................................................................................. .............. g* ml
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Convert weight of water to volume by dividing total weight increase by density of water (1 g/ml).
Figure 5B-1. Analytical Data Sheet
* * * * *
Method 5I--Determination of Low Level Particulate Emissions From
Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.1. Description. The system setup and operation is essentially
identical to Method 5. Particulate is withdrawn isokinetically from
the source and collected on a 47 mm glass fiber filter maintained at
a temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9[emsp14][deg]F). The PM mass is determined by gravimetric
analysis after the removal of uncombined water. Specific measures in
this procedure designed to improve system performance at low
particulate levels include:
1. Improved sample handling procedures
2. Light weight sample filter assembly
3. Use of low residue grade acetone
Accuracy is improved through the minimization of systemic errors
associated with sample handling and weighing procedures. High purity
reagents, all glass, grease free, sample train components, and light
weight filter assemblies and beakers, each contribute to the overall
objective of improved precision and accuracy at low particulate
concentrations.
* * * * *
8.5.2.2 Care should be taken to maintain the filter box
temperature of the paired trains as close as possible to the Method
required temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9[emsp14][deg]F). If separate ovens are being used for
simultaneously operated trains, it is recommended that the oven
temperature of each train be maintained within 5 [deg]C
(9[emsp14][deg]F) of each other. Note: After startup of
the sampling system, it may take several minutes to equilibrate the
system and temperature reading to within the required temperature
threshold.
* * * * *
0
14. In appendix A-4 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 in Method 7.
0
b. Redesignate sections 6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 to read as sections
6.1.1.2 through 6.1.1.5 in Method 8.
0
c. Add a new section 6.1.1.1 in Method 8.
0
d. Revise Figure 8-1 in Method 8.
Appendix A-4 to Part 60--Test Methods 6 Through 10B
* * * * *
Method 7--Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
10.1.2 Determination of Spectrophotometer Calibration Factor
Kc. Add 0 ml, 2.0 ml, 4.0 ml, 6.0 ml, and 8.0 ml of the
KNO3 working standard solution (1 ml = 100 [mu]g
NO2) to a series of five 50-ml volumetric flasks. To each
flask, add 25 ml of absorbing solution and 10 ml water. Add 1 N NaOH
to each flask until the pH is between 9 and 12 (about 25 to 35
drops). Dilute to the mark with water. Mix thoroughly, and pipette a
25-ml aliquot of each solution into a separate porcelain evaporating
dish. Beginning with the evaporation step, follow the analysis
procedure of section 11.2 until the solution has been transferred to
the 100-ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark. Measure the
absorbance of each solution at the optimum wavelength as determined
in section 10.1.1.2. This calibration procedure must be repeated on
each day that samples are analyzed. Calculate the spectrophotometer
calibration factor as shown in section 12.2.
* * * * *
11.3 Sample Analysis. Mix the contents of the flask thoroughly,
and measure the absorbance at the optimum wavelength used for the
standards (Section 10.1.1.2), using the blank solution as a zero
reference. Dilute the sample and the blank with equal volumes of
water if the absorbance exceeds A4, the absorbance of the
400-[mu]g NO2 standard (see section 10.1.3).
* * * * *
Method 8--Determination of Sulfuric Acid and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions
From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
6.1.1.1 Probe Nozzle. Borosilicate or quartz glass with a sharp,
tapered leading edge and coupled to the probe liner using a Teflon
union. When the stack temperature exceeds 210 [deg]C
(410[emsp14][deg]F), a leak-free ground glass fitting or other leak
free, non-contaminating fitting must be used to couple the nozzle to
the probe liner. It is also acceptable to use a one-piece glass
nozzle/liner assembly. The angle of the taper shall be >30[deg], and
the taper shall be on the outside to preserve a constant internal
diameter. The probe nozzle shall be of the button-hook or elbow
design, unless otherwise specified by
[[Page 3644]]
the Administrator. Other materials of construction may be used,
subject to the approval of the Administrator. A range of nozzle
sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling should be available. Typical
nozzle sizes range from 0.32 to 1.27 cm (\1/8\ to \1/2\ in) inside
diameter (ID) in increments of 0.16 cm (\1/16\ in). Larger nozzles
sizes are also available if higher volume sampling trains are used.
6.1.1.2 Probe Liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass, with a
heating system to prevent visible condensation during sampling. Do
not use metal probe liners.
6.1.1.3 Filter Holder. Borosilicate glass, with a glass frit
filter support and a silicone rubber gasket. Other gasket materials
(e.g., Teflon or Viton) may be used, subject to the approval of the
Administrator. The holder design shall provide a positive seal
against leakage from the outside or around the filter. The filter
holder shall be placed between the first and second impingers. Do
not heat the filter holder.
6.1.1.4 Impingers. Four, of the Greenburg-Smith design, as shown
in Figure 8-1. The first and third impingers must have standard
tips. The second and fourth impingers must be modified by replacing
the insert with an approximately 13-mm (\1/2\-in.) ID glass tube,
having an unconstricted tip located 13 mm (\1/2\ in.) from the
bottom of the impinger. Similar collection systems, subject to the
approval of the Administrator, may be used.
6.1.1.5 Temperature Sensor. Thermometer, or equivalent, to
measure the temperature of the gas leaving the impinger train to
within 1 [deg]C (2[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.001
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
* * * * *
0
15. Redesignate paragraph (c) as paragraph (b) in section 13.1 in
Method 18 of appendix A-6 to part 60 to read as follows:
Appendix A-6 to Part 60--Test Methods 16 Through 18
* * * * *
Method 18--Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas
Chromatography
* * * * *
13.1 * * *
(b) Recovery. After developing an appropriate sampling and
analytical system for the pollutants of interest, conduct the
procedure in section 8.4. Conduct the appropriate recovery study in
section 8.4 at each sampling point where the method is being
applied. Submit the data and results of the recovery procedure with
the reporting of results under section 8.3.
* * * * *
0
16. In appendix A-7 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 in Method 22.
0
b. Add section 11.2.3 in Method 22.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix A-7 to Part 60--Test Methods 19 Through 25E
* * * * *
Method 22--Visual Determination of Fugitive Emissions From Material
Sources and Smoke Emissions From Flares
* * * * *
11.2.1 Outdoor Location. Record the following information on the
field data sheet (Figure 22-1): Company name, industry, process
unit, observer's name, observer's affiliation, and date. Record also
the
[[Page 3645]]
estimated wind speed, wind direction, and sky condition. Sketch the
process unit being observed, and note the observer location relative
to the source and the sun. Indicate the potential and actual
emission points on the sketch. Alternatively, digital photography as
described in Section 11.2.3 may be used for a subset of the
recordkeeping requirements of this section.
11.2.2 Indoor Location. Record the following information on the
field data sheet (Figure 22-2): Company name, industry, process
unit, observer's name, observer's affiliation, and date. Record as
appropriate the type, location, and intensity of lighting on the
data sheet. Sketch the process unit being observed, and note the
observer location relative to the source. Indicate the potential and
actual fugitive emission points on the sketch. Alternatively,
digital photography as described in Section 11.2.3 may be used for a
subset of the recordkeeping requirements of this section.
11.2.3 Digital Photographic Records. Digital photographs,
annotated or unaltered, may be used to record and report sky
conditions, observer's location relative to the source, observer's
location relative to the sun, process unit being observed, potential
emission points and actual emission points for the requirements in
Sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2. The image must have the proper lighting,
field of view and depth of field to properly distinguish the sky
condition (if applicable), process unit, potential emission point
and actual emission point. At least one digital photograph must be
from the point of the view of the observer. The photograph(s)
representing the environmental conditions must be taken within
reasonable time of the observation (i.e., 15 mins). Any photographs
altered or annotated must be retained in an unaltered format for
recordkeeping purposes.
* * * * *
0
17. In appendix A-8 to part 60:
0
a. Revise section 6.2.2 in Method 26.
0
b. Revise section 6.2.1 in Method 26A.
0
c. Add section 6.2.4 in Method 26A.
0
d. Revise equation 8 in section 13.5.1 in Test Method 28WHH.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix A-8 to Part 60--Test Methods 26 Through 30B
* * * * *
Method 26--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
6.2.2 Storage Bottles. 100- or 250-ml, high-density polyethylene
or glass sample storage containers with Teflon screw cap liners to
store impinger samples.
* * * * *
Method 26A--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
6.2.1 Probe-Liner and Probe-Nozzle Brushes, Wash Bottles, Petri
Dishes, Graduated Cylinder and/or Balance, and Rubber Policeman.
Same as Method 5, sections 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.4, 6.2.5, and 6.2.7.
* * * * *
6.2.4 Sample Storage Containers. High-density polyethylene or
glass sample storage containers with Teflon screw cap liners to
store impinger samples.
Test Method 28WHH for Measurement of Particulate Emissions and Heating
Efficiency of Wood-Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances
* * * * *
13.5.1 * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.002
* * * * *
0
18. In appendix B to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1, 8.1(1), 8.1(3)(ii), 8.2(1), 8.2(2),
8.2(3), 9.0, 12.1, 13.1, 13.2, and 16.0 8. in Performance Specification
1.
0
b. Revise section 13.2 in Performance Specification 2.
0
c. Revise sections 12.0 and 13.2 in Performance Specification 3.
0
d. Revise section 13.1 in Performance Specification 11.
0
e. Add section 13.0 in Performance Specification 15.
0
f. Revise section 11.8.7 and table 1 in Performance Specification 18.
0
g. Add section 12.0 to Appendix A of Performance Specification 18.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 60--Performance Specifications
* * * * *
Performance Specification 1--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.1 ASTM D6216-12 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 60.17)
is the reference for design specifications, manufacturer's
performance specifications, and test procedures. The opacity monitor
manufacturer must periodically select and test an opacity monitor,
that is representative of a group of monitors produced during a
specified period or lot, for conformance with the design
specifications in ASTM D6216-12. The opacity monitor manufacturer
must test each opacity monitor for conformance with the
manufacturer's performance specifications in ASTM D6216-12. Note: If
the initial certification of the opacity monitor occurred before
January 26, 2018 using D6216-98, D6216-03, or D6216-07, it is not
necessary to recertify using D6216-12.
* * * * *
3.1 All definitions and discussions from section 3 of ASTM
D6216-12 are applicable to PS-1.
* * * * *
6.1 Continuous Opacity Monitoring System. You, as owner or
operator, are responsible for purchasing an opacity monitor that
meets the specifications of ASTM D6216-12, including a suitable data
recorder or automated data acquisition handling system. Example data
recorders include an analog strip chart recorder or more
appropriately an electronic data acquisition and reporting system
with an input signal range compatible with the analyzer output.
* * * * *
8.1 * * *
(1) You must purchase an opacity monitor that complies with ASTM
D6216-12 and obtain a certificate of conformance from the opacity
monitor manufacturer.
(2) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Calibration Error Check. Conduct a three-point calibration
error test using three calibration attenuators that produce outlet
pathlength corrected, single-pass opacity values shown in ASTM
D6216-12, section 7.5. If your applicable limit is less than 10
percent opacity, use attenuators as described in ASTM D6216-12,
section 7.5 for applicable standards of 10 to 19 percent opacity.
Confirm the external audit device produces the proper zero value on
the COMS data recorder. Separately, insert each calibration
attenuators (low, mid, and high-level) into the external audit
device. While inserting each attenuator, (1) ensure that the entire
light beam passes through the attenuator, (2) minimize interference
from reflected light, and (3) leave the attenuator in place for at
least two times the shortest recording interval on the COMS data
recorder. Make a total of five nonconsecutive readings for each
attenuator. At the end of the test, correlate each attenuator
insertion to the corresponding value from the data recorder.
Subtract the single-pass calibration attenuator values corrected to
the stack exit conditions from the COMS responses. Calculate the
arithmetic mean difference, standard deviation, and confidence
coefficient of the five measurements value using equations 1-3, 1-4,
and 1-5. Calculate the calibration error as the sum of the absolute
value of the mean difference and the 95 percent confidence
coefficient for each of the three test attenuators using equation 1-
6. Report the calibration error test results for each of the three
attenuators.
* * * * *
8.2 * * *
(1) Conduct the verification procedures for design
specifications in section 6 of ASTM D6216-12.
[[Page 3646]]
(2) Conduct the verification procedures for performance
specifications in section 7 of ASTM D6216-12.
(3) Provide to the owner or operator, a report of the opacity
monitor's conformance to the design and performance specifications
required in sections 6 and 7 of ASTM D6216-12 in accordance with the
reporting requirements of section 9 in ASTM D6216-12.
* * * * *
9.0 What quality control measures are required by PS-1?
Opacity monitor manufacturers must initiate a quality program
following the requirements of ASTM D6216-12, section 8. The quality
program must include (1) a quality system and (2) a corrective
action program.
* * * * *
12.1 Desired Attenuator Values. Calculate the desired attenuator
value corrected to the emission outlet pathlength as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.003
Where:
OP1 = Nominal opacity value of required low-, mid-, or
high-range calibration attenuators.
OP2 = Desired attenuator opacity value from ASTM D6216-
12, section 7.5 at the opacity limit required by the applicable
subpart.
L1 = Monitoring pathlength.
L2 = Emission outlet pathlength.
* * * * *
13.1 Design Specifications. The opacity monitoring equipment
must comply with the design specifications of ASTM D6216-12.
13.2 Manufacturer's Performance Specifications. The opacity
monitor must comply with the manufacturer's performance
specifications of ASTM D6216-12.
* * * * *
16.0 * * *
8. ASTM D6216-12: Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).
April 1998.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 2--Specifications and Test Procedures for
SO2 and NOX Continuous Emission Monitoring
Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
13.2 Relative Accuracy Performance Specification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RA criteria
Calculate . . . (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If average emissions during the Use Eq. 2-6, with RM in <20.0
RATA are >=50% of emission the denominator.
standard.
If average emissions during the Use Eq. 2-6, emission <10.0
RATA are <50% of emission standard in the
standard. denominator.
For SO2 emission standards <130 Use Eq. 2-6, emission <15.0
but 86 ng/J (0.30 standard in the
and 0.20 lb/million Btu). denominator.
For SO2 emission standards <86 Use Eq. 2-6, emission <20.0
ng/J (0.20 lb/million Btu). standard in the
denominator.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Performance Specification 3--Specifications and Test Procedures for
O2 and CO2 Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems
in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
12.0 Calculations and Data Analysis
Summarize the results on a data sheet similar to that shown in
Figure 2.2 of PS2.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.004
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.005
* * * * *
13.2 CEMS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification. The RA of
the CEMS must be no greater than 20.0 percent of the mean value of
the reference method
[[Page 3647]]
(RM) data when calculated using equation 3-1. The results are also
acceptable if the result of Equation 3-2 is less than or equal to
1.0 percent O2 (or CO2).
* * * * *
Performance Specification 11--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
13.1 What is the 7-day drift check performance specification?
Your daily PM CEMS internal drift checks must demonstrate that the
daily drift of your PM CEMS does not deviate from the value of the
reference light, optical filter, Beta attenuation signal, or other
technology-suitable reference standard by more than 2 percent of the
response range. If your CEMS includes diluent and/or auxiliary
monitors (for temperature, pressure, and/or moisture) that are
employed as a necessary part of this performance specification, you
must determine the calibration drift separately for each ancillary
monitor in terms of its respective output (see the appropriate
performance specification for the diluent CEMS specification). None
of the calibration drifts may exceed their individual specification.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 15--Performance Specification for Extractive
FTIR Continuous Emissions Monitor Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
13.0 Method Performance [Reserved]
* * * * *
Performance Specification 18--Performance Specifications and Test
Procedures for Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources
* * * * *
11.8.7 The zero-level and mid-level CD for each day must be less
than 5.0 percent of the span value as specified in section 13.2 of
this PS. You must meet this criterion for 7 consecutive operating
days.
* * * * *
Table 1--Interference Test Gas Concentrations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximate concentration
Potential interferent gas \1\ (balance N2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CO2.................................. 15% 1% CO2.\2\
CO................................... 100 20 ppm.
CH2O................................. 20 5 ppm.
CH4.................................. 100 20 ppm.
NH3.................................. 10 5 ppm (extractive
CEMS only).
NO................................... 250 50 ppm.
SO2.................................. 200 20 ppm.
O2................................... 3% 1% O2.\2\
H2O.................................. 10% 1% H2O.\2\
N2................................... Balance.\2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Any of these specific gases can be tested at a lower level if the
manufacturer has provided reliable means for limiting or scrubbing
that gas to a specified level in CEMS field installations.
\2\ Gases for short path IP cell interference tests cannot be added
above 100 percent stack equivalent concentration. Add these gases at
the indicated percentages to make up the remaining cell volume.
* * * * *
PS-18 Appendix A--Standard Addition Procedures
* * * * *
12.0 Reserved
* * * * *
0
19. Revise sections 5.1.2(1) and 5.1.2(3) in Procedure 1 of appendix F
to part 60 to read as follows:
Appendix F to Part 60--Quality Assurance Procedures
Procedure 1--Quality Assurance Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems Used for Compliance Determination
* * * * *
5.1.2 Cylinder Gas Audit (CGA). If applicable, a CGA may be
conducted in three of four calendar quarters, but in no more than
three quarters in succession.
To conduct a CGA: (1) Challenge the CEMS (both pollutant and
diluent portions of the CEMS, if applicable) with an audit gas of
known concentration at two points within the following ranges:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit range
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit point Diluent monitors for--
Pollutant monitors --------------------------------------------------------
CO2 O2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................................. 20 to 30% of span 5 to 8% by volume.. 4 to 6% by volume.
value.
2................................. 50 to 60% of span 10 to 14% by volume 8 to 12% by volume.
value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inject each of the audit gases, three times each for a total of
six injections. Inject the gases in such a manner that the entire
CEMS is challenged. Do not inject the same gas concentration twice
in succession.
Use of separate audit gas cylinder for audit points 1 and 2. Do
not dilute gas from audit cylinder when challenging the CEMS.
The monitor should be challenged at each audit point for a
sufficient period of time to assure adsorption-desorption of the
CEMS sample transport surfaces has stabilized.
(2) * * *
(3) Use Certified Reference Materials (CRM's) (See Citation 1)
audit gases that have been certified by comparison to National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference
Materials (SRM's) or EPA Protocol Gases following the most recent
edition of the EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification
of Gaseous Calibration Standards (See Citation 2). Procedures for
preparation of CRM's are described in Citation 1. Procedures for
preparation of EPA Protocol Gases are described in Citation 2. In
the case that a suitable audit gas level is not commercially
available, Method 205 (See Citation 3) may be used to dilute CRM's
or EPA Protocol Gases to the needed level. The difference between
the actual concentration of the audit gas and the concentration
indicated by the monitor is used to assess the accuracy of the CEMS.
* * * * *
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
20. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
21. In Sec. 63.7, revise paragraphs (g)(2) introductory text and
(g)(2)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.7 Performance testing requirements.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) Contents of a performance test, CMS performance evaluation, or
CMS quality assurance test report (electronic or paper submitted copy).
Unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard, test method, CMS
performance specification, or quality assurance requirement for a CMS,
or as otherwise approved by the Administrator in writing, the report
shall include the elements identified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through
(vi) of this section.
* * * * *
(v) Where a test method, CMS performance specification, or on-going
quality assurance requirement for a CMS requires you record or report,
the following shall be included in your
[[Page 3648]]
report: Record of preparation of standards, record of calibrations, raw
data sheets for field sampling, raw data sheets for field and
laboratory analyses, chain-of-custody documentation, and example
calculations for reported results.
* * * * *
0
22. In Sec. 63.8, revise paragraph (e)(5)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.8 Monitoring requirements.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(5) * * * (i) The owner or operator shall furnish the Administrator
a copy of a written report of the results of the performance evaluation
containing the information specified in Sec. 63.7(g)(2)(i) through
(vi) within 60 days of completion of the performance evaluation, unless
otherwise specified in a relevant standard.
* * * * *
Subpart NNN--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
0
23. Revise Sec. 63.1385(a)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.1385 Test methods and procedures.
(a) * * *
(5) Method 5 or Method 29 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A-3) for the
concentration of total PM. When using Method 5, each run must consist
of a minimum sample volume of 2 dry standard cubic meters (dscm). When
using Method 29, each run must consist of a minimum sample volume of 3
dscm. When measuring PM concentration using either Method 5 or 29, the
probe and filter holder heating system must be set to provide a gas
temperature no greater than 120 5 [deg]C (248 9
[deg]F).
* * * * *
Subpart DDDDD--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and
Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters
* * * * *
0
24. Revise Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of part 63 to read as follows:
Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of Part 63--Fuel Analysis Requirements
[As stated in Sec. 63.7521, you must comply with the following
requirements for fuel analysis testing for existing, new or
reconstructed affected sources. However, equivalent methods (as defined
in Sec. 63.7575) may be used in lieu of the prescribed methods at the
discretion of the source owner or operator]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To conduct a fuel analysis for
the following pollutant . . . You must . . . Using . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Mercury.................... a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192,\a\ or ASTM
D7430,\a\ or ASTM
D6883,\a\ or ASTM
D2234/D2234M \a\
(for coal) or EPA
1631 or EPA 1631E or
ASTM D6323 \a\ (for
solid), or EPA 821-R-
01-013 (for liquid
or solid), or ASTM
D4177 \a\ (for
liquid), or ASTM
D4057 \a\ (for
liquid), or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B \a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M
\a\ (for coal), ASTM
D5198 \a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050 \a\ (for solid
fuel), or EPA 821-R-
01-013 \a\ (for
liquid or solid), or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865 \a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM E711
fuel type. \a\ (for biomass),
or ASTM D5864 \a\
for liquids and
other solids, or
ASTM D240 \a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173,\a\ ASTM
moisture content E871,\a\ or ASTM
of the fuel type. D5864,\a\ or ASTM
D240, or ASTM D95
\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006 \a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure ASTM D6722 \a\ (for
mercury coal), EPA SW-846-
concentration in 7471B \a\ or EPA
fuel sample. 1631 or EPA 1631E
(for solid samples),
or EPA SW-846-7470A
\a\ or EPA SW-846-
7471B \a\ (for
liquid samples), or
EPA 821-R-01-013
(for liquid or
solid), or
equivalent.
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentration Equation 8 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530.
pounds of
mercury per
MMBtu of heat
content.
2. HCl........................ a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192,\a\ or ASTM
D7430,\a\ or ASTM
D6883,\a\ or ASTM
D2234/D2234M \a\
(for coal) or ASTM
D6323 \a\ (for coal
or biomass), ASTM
D4177 \a\ (for
liquid fuels) or
ASTM D4057 \a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B \a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M
\a\ (for coal), or
ASTM D5198 \a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050 \a\ or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865 \a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM E711
fuel type. \a\ (for biomass),
ASTM D5864, ASTM
D240 \a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173 \a\ or
moisture content ASTM E871,\a\ or
of the fuel type. D5864,\a\ or ASTM
D240,\a\ or ASTM D95
\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006 \a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure EPA SW-846-9250,\a\
chlorine ASTM D6721,\a\ ASTM
concentration in D4208 \a\ (for
fuel sample. coal), or EPA SW-846-
5050 \a\ or ASTM
E776 \a\ (for solid
fuel), or EPA SW-846-
9056 \a\ or SW-846-
9076 \a\ (for solids
or liquids) or
equivalent.
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentrations Equation 7 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530 and convert
pounds of HCl from chlorine to HCl
per MMBtu of by multiplying by
heat content. 1.028.
3. Mercury Fuel Specification a. Measure Method 30B (M30B) at
for other gas 1 fuels. mercury 40 CFR part 60,
concentration in appendix A-8 of this
the fuel sample chapter or ASTM
and convert to D5954,\a\ ASTM
units of D6350,\a\ ISO 6978-
micrograms per 1:2003(E).\a\ or ISO
cubic meter, or. 6978-2:2003(E),\a\
or EPA-1631 \a\ or
equivalent.
[[Page 3649]]
b. Measure Method 29, 30A, or
mercury 30B (M29, M30A, or
concentration in M30B) at 40 CFR part
the exhaust gas 60, appendix A-8 of
when firing only this chapter or
the other gas 1 Method 101A or
fuel is fired in Method 102 at 40 CFR
the boiler or part 61, appendix B
process heater. of this chapter, or
ASTM Method D6784
\a\ or equivalent.
4. TSM........................ a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192,\a\ or ASTM
D7430,\a\ or ASTM
D6883,\a\ or ASTM
D2234/D2234M \a\
(for coal) or ASTM
D6323 \a\ (for coal
or biomass), or ASTM
D4177,\a\ (for
liquid fuels)or ASTM
D4057 \a\ (for
liquid fuels),or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B \a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M
\a\ (for coal), ASTM
D5198 \a\ or TAPPI
T266 \a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050 \a\ or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865 \a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM E711
fuel type. \a\ (for biomass),
or ASTM D5864 \a\
for liquids and
other solids, or
ASTM D240 \a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173 \a\ or
moisture content ASTM E871,\a\ or
of the fuel type. D5864, or ASTM
D240,\a\ or ASTM D95
\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006 \a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
ASTM D4177 \a\ (for
liquid fuels) or
ASTM D4057 \a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure TSM ASTM D3683,\a\ or
concentration in ASTM D4606,\a\ or
fuel sample. ASTM D6357 \a\ or
EPA 200.8 \a\ or EPA
SW-846-6020,\a\ or
EPA SW-846-6020A,\a\
or EPA SW-846-
6010C,\a\ EPA 7060
\a\ or EPA 7060A \a\
(for arsenic only),
or EPA SW-846-7740
\a\ (for selenium
only).
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentrations Equation 9 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530.
pounds of TSM
per MMBtu of
heat content.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
* * * * *
Subpart UUUUU--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating
Units
0
25. Revise Sec. 63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.10010 What are my monitoring, installation, operation, and
maintenance requirements?
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(7) * * *
(i) * * *
(1) Install and certify your PM CEMS according to the procedures
and requirements in Performance Specification 11--Specifications and
Test Procedures for Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring
Systems at Stationary Sources in Appendix B to part 60 of this chapter,
using Method 5 at Appendix A-3 to part 60 of this chapter and ensuring
that the front half filter temperature shall be 160[deg] 5
[deg]C (320[deg] 9[emsp14][deg]F). The reportable
measurement output from the PM CEMS must be expressed in units of the
applicable emissions limit (e.g., lb/MMBtu, lb/MWh).
* * * * *
0
26. Revise Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of part 63 to read as follows:
Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of Part 63--Performance Testing Requirements
[As stated in Sec. 63.10007, you must comply with the following requirements performance testing for existing,
new or reconstructed affected sources: 1]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must perform the
following activities, as
To conduct a performance test for Using . . . applicable to your input- Using . . . 2
the following pollutant . . . or output-based emission
limit . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Filterable Particulate matter Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
(PM). location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
[[Page 3650]]
e. Measure the filterable Methods 5 and 5I at
PM concentration. appendix A-3 to part 60
of this chapter.
For positive pressure
fabric filters, Method
5D at appendix A-3 to
part 60 of this chapter
for filterable PM
emissions.
Note that the Method 5 or
5I front half
temperature shall be
160[deg] 14
[deg]C (320[deg] 25 [deg]F).
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/MMBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/MWh emissions rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
OR OR
PM CEMS.............. a. Install, certify, Performance Specification
operate, and maintain the 11 at appendix B to part
PM CEMS. 60 of this chapter and
Procedure 2 at appendix
F to part 60 of this
chapter.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
2. Total or individual non-Hg HAP Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
metals. location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the HAP metals Method 29 at appendix A-8
emissions concentrations to part 60 of this
and determine each chapter. For liquid oil-
individual HAP metals fired units, Hg is
emissions concentration, included in HAP metals
as well as the total and you may use Method
filterable HAP metals 29, Method 30B at
emissions concentration appendix A-8 to part 60
and total HAP metals of this chapter; for
emissions concentration. Method 29, you must
report the front half
and back half results
separately. When using
Method 29, report metals
matrix spike and
recovery levels.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentrations methodology at appendix
(individual HAP metals, A-7 to part 60 of this
total filterable HAP chapter, or calculate
metals, and total HAP using mass emissions
metals) to lb/MMBtu or lb/ rate and gross output
MWh emissions rates. data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
3. Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
hydrogen fluoride (HF). location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the HCl and HF Method 26 or Method 26A
emissions concentrations. at appendix A-8 to part
60 of this chapter or
Method 320 at appendix A
to part 63 of this
chapter or ASTM 6348-03
3 with
(1) the following
conditions when using
ASTM D6348-03:
(A) The test plan
preparation and
implementation in the
Annexes to ASTM D6348-
03, Sections A1 through
A8 are mandatory;
[[Page 3651]]
(B) For ASTM D6348-03
Annex A5 (Analyte
Spiking Technique), the
percent (%) R must be
determined for each
target analyte (see
Equation A5.5);
(C) For the ASTM D6348-03
test data to be
acceptable for a target
analyte, %R must be 70%
>=R <=130%; and
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Regarding emissions data collected during periods of startup or shutdown, see Sec. Sec. 63.10020(b) and
(c) and 63.10021(h).
\2\ See Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required sample volumes and/or sampling run times.
\3\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
3.e.1(D) The %R value for each compound must be reported in the
test report and all field measurements corrected with the calculated %R
value for that compound using the following equation:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.006
and
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must perform the
To conduct a performance test for following activities, as
the following pollutant . . . Using . . . (cont'd) applicable to your input- Using . . .2 (cont'd)
(cont'd) or output-based emission
limit . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) spiking levels
nominally no greater
than two times the level
corresponding to the
applicable emission
limit.
Method 26A must be used
if there are entrained
water droplets in the
exhaust stream.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/MMBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/MWh emissions rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
OR OR
HCl and/or HF CEMS... a. Install, certify, Appendix B of this
operate, and maintain the subpart.
HCl or HF CEMS.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
4. Mercury (Hg)................... Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter or Method 30B at
Appendix A-8 for Method
30B point selection.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-1 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the Hg emission Method 30B at appendix A-
concentration. 8 to part 60 of this
chapter, ASTM D6784,3 or
Method 29 at appendix A-
8 to part 60 of this
chapter; for Method 29,
you must report the
front half and back half
results separately.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/TBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/GWh emission rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
[[Page 3652]]
OR OR
Hg CEMS.............. a. Install, certify, Sections 3.2.1 and 5.1 of
operate, and maintain the appendix A of this
CEMS. subpart.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Section 6 of appendix A
emissions concentrations to this subpart.
to 30 boiler operating
day rolling average lb/
TBtu or lb/GWh emissions
rates.
OR OR
Sorbent trap a. Install, certify, Sections 3.2.2 and 5.2 of
monitoring system. operate, and maintain the appendix A to this
sorbent trap monitoring subpart.
system.
b. Install, operate, and Part 75 of this chapter
maintain the diluent gas, and Sec. 63.10010(a),
flow rate, and/or (b), (c), and (d).
moisture monitoring
systems.
c. Convert emissions Section 6 of appendix A
concentrations to 30 to this subpart.
boiler operating day
rolling average lb/TBtu
or lb/GWh emissions rates.
OR OR
LEE testing.......... a. Select sampling ports Single point located at
location and the number the 10% centroidal area
of traverse points. of the duct at a port
location per Method 1 at
appendix A-1 to part 60
of this chapter or
Method 30B at Appendix A-
8 for Method 30B point
selection.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G,
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter or flow
monitoring system
certified per appendix A
of this subpart.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-1 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981,3 or
diluent gas monitoring
systems certified
according to part 75 of
this chapter.
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter, or moisture
monitoring systems
certified according to
part 75 of this chapter.
e. Measure the Hg emission Method 30B at appendix A-
concentration. 8 to part 60 of this
chapter; perform a 30
operating day test, with
a maximum of 10
operating days per run
(i.e., per pair of
sorbent traps) or
sorbent trap monitoring
system or Hg CEMS
certified per appendix A
of this subpart.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentrations from the methodology at appendix
LEE test to lb/TBtu or lb/ A-7 to part 60 of this
GWh emissions rates. chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
g. Convert average lb/TBtu Potential maximum annual
or lb/GWh Hg emission heat input in TBtu or
rate to lb/year, if you potential maximum
are attempting to meet electricity generated in
the 29.0 lb/year GWh.
threshold.
5. Sulfur dioxide (SO2)........... SO2 CEMS............. a. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a)
CEMS. and (f).
b. Install, operate, and Part 75 of this chapter
maintain the diluent gas, and Sec. 63.10010(a),
flow rate, and/or (b), (c), and (d).
moisture monitoring
systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 See Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required sample volumes and/or sampling run times.
3 Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
* * * * *
0
27. In appendix A to part 63:
0
a. Revise section 12.4 in Method 303.
0
b. Revise sections 2.0, 7.2.3.3, 8.1.2, 9.1, 11.3.2, and 12.1 in Method
308.
0
c. Remove and reserve section 7.2.2 in Method 308.
0
d. Add sections 12.5 and 13.0 in Method 308.
0
e. Revise section 9.2.3 in Method 320..
0
f. Revise section 12.9 in Method 323.
0
g. Revise section 8.2.1.3, Figure 8.1. and section 8.2.3.2 in Method
325A.
0
h. Add section 8.2.3.3 in Method 325A.
[[Page 3653]]
0
i. Revise sections 9.3.2, 9.13, 11.3.2.5, and 12.2.2 and table 17-1 in
Method 325B.
0
j. Remove sections 12.2.3 and 12.2.4 in Method 325B.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 63--Test Methods Pollutant Measurement Methods From
Various Waste Media
* * * * *
Method 303--Determination of Visible Emissions From By-Product Coke
Oven Batteries
* * * * *
12.4 Average Duration of VE from Charging Operations. Use
Equation 303-3 to calculate the daily 30-day rolling log average of
seconds of visible emissions from the charging operation for each
battery using these current day's observations and the 29 previous
valid daily sets of observations.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.007
* * * * *
Method 308--Procedure for Determination of Methanol Emission From
Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.0 Summary of Method
A gas sample is extracted from the sampling point in the stack.
The methanol is collected in deionized distilled water and adsorbed
on silica gel. The sample is returned to the laboratory where the
methanol in the water fraction is separated from other organic
compounds with a gas chromatograph (GC) and is then measured by a
flame ionization detector (FID). The fraction adsorbed on silica gel
is extracted with deionized distilled water and is then separated
and measured by GC/FID.
* * * * *
7.2.2 [Reserved].
* * * * *
7.2.3.3 Methanol Standards for Adsorbent Tube Samples. Prepare a
series of methanol standards by first pipetting 10 ml of the
methanol working standard into a 100-ml volumetric flask and
diluting the contents to exactly 100 ml with deionized distilled
water. This standard will contain 10 [micro]g/ml of methanol.
Pipette 5, 15, and 25 ml of this standard, respectively, into four
50-ml volumetric flasks. Dilute each solution to 50 ml with
deionized distilled water. These standards will have 1, 3, and 5
[micro]g/ml of methanol, respectively. Transfer all four standards
into 40-ml glass vials capped with Teflon[supreg]-lined septa and
store under refrigeration. Discard any excess solution.
* * * * *
8.1.2 Leak Check. A leak check before and after the sampling run
is mandatory. The leak-check procedure is as follows:
Temporarily attach a suitable (e.g., 0- to 40-ml/min) rotameter
to the outlet of the DGM, and place a vacuum gauge at or near the
probe inlet. Plug the probe inlet, pull a vacuum of at least 250 mm
(10 inch) Hg or the highest vacuum experienced during the sampling
run, and note the flow rate as indicated by the rotameter. A leakage
rate in excess of 2 percent of the average sampling rate is
acceptable.
Note: Carefully release the probe inlet plug before turning off
the pump.
* * * * *
9.1 Miscellaneous Quality Control Measures. The following
quality control measures are required:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quality control
Section measure Effect
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.1.2, 8.1.3, 10.1......... Sampling equipment Ensures accurate
leak check and measurement of
calibration. sample volume.
10.2....................... GC calibration....... Ensures precision of
GC analysis.
13.0....................... Methanol spike Verifies all
recovery check. methanol in stack
gas is being
captured in impinge/
adsorbent tube
setup.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
11.3.2 Desorption of Samples. Add 3 ml of deionized distilled
water to each of the stoppered vials and shake or vibrate the vials
for 30 minutes.
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature.
Caf = Concentration of methanol in the front of the
adsorbent tube, [micro]g/ml.
Cab = Concentration of methanol in the back of the
adsorbent tube, [micro]g/ml.
Ci = Concentration of methanol in the impinger portion of
the sample train, [micro]g/ml.
E = Mass emission rate of methanol, [micro]g/hr (lb/hr).
ms = Total mass of compound measured in impinger and on
adsorbent with spiked train (mg).
mu = Total mass of compound measured in impinger and on
adsorbent with unspiked train (mg).
mv = Mass per volume of spiked compound measured (mg/L).
Mtot = Total mass of methanol collected in the sample
train, [micro]g.
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the exit orifice of the
DGM, mm Hg (in. Hg).
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in.
Hg).
Qstd = Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate corrected to
standard conditions, dscm/hr (dscf/hr).
R = fraction of spiked compound recovered
s = theoretical concentration (ppm) of spiked target compound
Tm = Average DGM absolute temperature, degrees K
([deg]R).
Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 293 degrees K (528
[deg]R).
Vaf = Volume of front half adsorbent sample, ml.
Vab = Volume of back half adsorbent sample, ml.
Vi = Volume of impinger sample, ml.
Vm = Dry gas volume as measured by the DGM, dry cubic
meters (dcm), dry cubic feet (dcf).
Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by the DGM, corrected
to standard conditions, dry standard cubic meters (dscm), dry
standard cubic feet (dscf).
* * * * *
12.5 Recovery Fraction (R)
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.008
[[Page 3654]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.009
13.0 Method Performance
Since a potential sample may contain a variety of compounds from
various sources, a specific precision limit for the analysis of
field samples is impractical. Precision in the range of 5 to 10
percent relative standard deviation (RSD) is typical for gas
chromatographic techniques, but an experienced GC operator with a
reliable instrument can readily achieve 5 percent RSD. For this
method, the following combined GC/operator values are required.
(a) Precision. Triplicate analyses of calibration standards fall
within 5 percent of their mean value.
(b) Recovery. After developing an appropriate sampling and
analytical system for the pollutants of interest, conduct the
following spike recovery procedure at each sampling point where the
method is being applied.
i. Methanol Spike. Set up two identical sampling trains.
Collocate the two sampling probes in the stack. The probes shall be
placed in the same horizontal plane, where the first probe tip is
2.5 cm from the outside edge of the other. One of the sampling
trains shall be designated the spiked train and the other the
unspiked train. Spike methanol into the impinger, and onto the
adsorbent tube in the spiked train prior to sampling. The total mass
of methanol shall be 40 to 60 percent of the mass expected to be
collected with the unspiked train. Sample the stack gas into the two
trains simultaneously. Analyze the impingers and adsorbents from the
two trains utilizing identical analytical procedures and
instrumentation. Determine the fraction of spiked methanol recovered
(R) by combining the amount recovered in the impinger and in the
adsorbent tube, using the equations in section 12.5. Recovery values
must fall in the range: 0.70 <=R <=1.30. Report the R value in the
test report.
* * * * *
Method 320--Measurement of Vapor Phase Organic and Inorganic Emissions
by Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy
* * * * *
9.2.3 Calculate the dilution ratio using the tracer gas as
follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.010
Where:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.011
DF = Dilution factor of the spike gas; this value shall be >=10.
SF6(dir) = SF6 (or tracer gas) concentration
measured directly in undiluted spike gas.
SF6(spk) = Diluted SF6 (or tracer gas)
concentration measured in a spiked sample.
Spikedir = Concentration of the analyte in the spike
standard measured by filling the FTIR cell directly.
CS = Expected concentration of the spiked samples.
Unspike = Native concentration of analytes in unspiked samples.
* * * * *
Method 323--Measurment of Formaldehyde Emissions From Natural Gas-Fired
Stationary Sources-Acetyl Acetone Derivitization Method
* * * * *
12.9 Formaldehyde Concentration Corrected to 15% Oxygen
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.012
* * * * *
Method 325A--Volatile Organic Compounds From Fugitive and Area Sources:
Sampler Deployment and VOC Sample Collection
* * * * *
8.2.1.3 Extra samplers must be placed near known sources of VOCs
if the potential emission source is within 50 meters (162 feet) of
the boundary and the source location is between two monitors.
Measure the distance (x) between the two monitors and place another
monitor approximately halfway between (x/2 10 percent)
the two monitors. Only one extra sampler is required between two
monitors to account for the known source of VOCs. For example, in
Figure 8.1, the facility added three additional monitors (i.e.,
light shaded sampler locations) and in Figure 8.2, the facility
added two additional monitors to provide sufficient coverage of all
area sources.
[[Page 3655]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.013
* * * * *
8.2.3.2 For facilities with a monitoring perimeter length
greater than or equal to 7,315 meters (24,000 feet), sampling
locations are spaced 610 76 meters (2,000 250 feet) apart.
8.2.3.3 Unless otherwise specified in an applicable regulation,
permit or other requirement, for small disconnected subareas with
known sources within 50 meters (162 feet) of the monitoring
perimeter, sampling points need not be placed closer than 152 meters
(500 feet) apart as long as a minimum of 3 monitoring locations are
used for each subarea.
* * * * *
Method 325B--Volatile Organic Compounds From Fugitive and Area Sources:
Sampler Preparation and Analysis
* * * * *
9.3.2 Field blanks must be shipped to the monitoring site with
the sampling tubes and must be stored at the sampling location
throughout the monitoring exercise. The field blanks must be
installed under a protective hood/cover at the sampling location,
but the long-term storage caps must remain in place throughout the
monitoring period (see Method 325A). The field blanks are then
shipped back to the laboratory in the same container as the sampled
tubes. Collect at least two field blank samples per sampling period
to ensure sample integrity associated with shipment, collection, and
storage.
* * * * *
9.13 Routine CCV at the Start of a Sequence. Run CCV before each
sequence of analyses and after every tenth sample to ensure that the
previous multi-level calibration (see Section 10.0) is still valid.
* * * * *
11.3.2.5 Whenever the thermal desorption--GC/MS analytical
method is changed or major equipment maintenance is performed, you
must conduct a new five-level calibration (see Section 10.0). System
calibration remains valid as long as results from subsequent CCV are
within 30 percent of the most recent 5-point calibration (see
Section 9.13). Include relevant CCV data in the supporting
information in the data report for each set of samples.
* * * * *
12.2.2 Determine the equivalent concentrations of compounds in
atmospheres as follows. Correct target compound concentrations
determined at the sampling site temperature and atmospheric pressure
to standard conditions (25 [deg]C and 760 mm mercury) using Equation
12.5.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.014
Where:
mmeas = The mass of the compound as measured in the
sorbent tube ([micro]g).
t = The exposure time (minutes).
[[Page 3656]]
tss = The average temperature during the collection
period at the sampling site (K).
UNTP = The method defined diffusive uptake rate (sampling
rate) (mL/min).
Note: Diffusive uptake rates (Ustd) for common VOCs,
using carbon sorbents packed into sorbent tubes of the dimensions
specified in Section 6.1, are listed in Table 12.1. Adjust
analytical conditions to keep expected sampled masses within range
(see Sections 11.3.1.3 to 11.3.1.5). Best possible method detection
limits are typically in the order of 0.1 ppb for 1,3-butadiene and
0.05 ppb for volatile aromatics such as benzene for 14-day
monitoring. However, actual detection limits will depend upon the
analytical conditions selected.
* * * * *
Table 17.1--Summary of GC/MS Analysis Quality Control Procedures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parameter Frequency Acceptance criteria Corrective action
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bromofluorobenzene Instrument Tune Daily \a\ prior to Evaluation criteria (1) Retune and or
Performance Check. sample analysis. presented in Section (2) Perform
9.5 and Table 9.2. Maintenance.
Five point calibration bracketing the Following any major (1) Percent Deviation (1) Repeat calibration
expected sample concentration. change, repair or (%DEV) of response sample analysis.
maintenance or if factors 30%. check.
meet method (2) Relative Retention (3) Prepare new
requirements. Times (RRTs) for calibration standards
Recalibration not to target peaks 0.06 units from repeat analysis.
mean RRT.
Calibration Verification (CCV Second Following the The response factor (1) Repeat calibration
source calibration verification calibration curve. 30% DEV check.
check). from calibration curve (2) Repeat calibration
average response curve.
factor.
Laboratory Blank Analysis............ Daily \a\ following (1) <=0.2 ppbv per (1) Repeat analysis
bromofluoro- benzene analyte or <=3 times with new blank tube.
and calibration check; the LOD, whichever is (2) Check system for
prior to sample greater. leaks, contamination.
analysis. (2) Internal Standard (3) Analyze additional
(IS) area response blank.
40% and IS
Retention Time (RT)
0.33 min.
of most recent
calibration check.
Blank Sorbent Tube Certification..... One tube analyzed for <0.2 ppbv per VOC Re-clean all tubes in
each batch of tubes targeted compound or 3 batch and reanalyze.
cleaned or 10 percent times the LOD,
of tubes whichever is whichever is greater.
greater.
Samples--Internal Standards.......... All samples............ IS area response 40% and IS RT invalidation.
0.33 min.
of most recent
calibration validation.
Field Blanks......................... Two per sampling period No greater than one- Flag Data for possible
third of the measured invalidation due to
target analyte or high blank bias.
compliance limit..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Every 24 hours.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-00470 Filed 1-25-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P