[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19637-19641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09412]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0315; FRL-9977-49-Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Regional Haze Plan and Prong 4
(Visibility) for the 2012 PM2.5, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2, and 2008 Ozone
NAAQS
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the
portion of Georgia's July 26, 2017, State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submittal changing reliance from the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)
to the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) for certain regional haze
requirements. EPA is also converting the previous limited approval/
limited disapproval of Georgia's regional haze plan to a full approval
and is removing the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for Georgia which
replaced reliance on CAIR with reliance on CSAPR. Finally, EPA is
converting the conditional approvals to full approvals for the
visibility prong of Georgia's infrastructure SIP submittals for the
2012 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5), 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide
(NO2), 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), and 2008 8-hour
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
DATES: This rule will be effective June 4, 2018.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0315. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Notarianni, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. Ms. Notarianni can be reached by telephone at (404) 562-
9031 or via electronic mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Regional Haze Plans and Their Relationship With CAIR and CSAPR
Section 169A(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) requires
states to submit regional haze plans that contain such measures as may
be necessary to make reasonable progress towards the natural visibility
goal, including a requirement that certain categories of existing major
stationary sources built between 1962 and 1977 procure, install, and
operate Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) as determined by the
state. Under the Regional Haze Rule (RHR), states are directed to
conduct BART determinations for such ``BART-eligible'' sources that may
be anticipated to cause or contribute to any visibility impairment in a
Class I area. Rather than requiring source-specific BART controls,
states also have the flexibility to adopt an emissions trading program
or other alternative program as long as the alternative provides
greater reasonable progress towards improving visibility than BART. See
40 CFR 51.308(e)(2). EPA provided states with this flexibility in the
RHR, adopted in 1999, and further refined the criteria for assessing
whether an alternative program provides for greater reasonable progress
in two subsequent rulemakings. See 64 FR 35714 (July 1, 1999); 70 FR
39104 (July 6, 2005); 71 FR 60612 (October 13, 2006).
EPA demonstrated that CAIR would achieve greater reasonable
progress than BART in revisions to the regional haze program made in
2005.\1\ See 70 FR 39104 (July 6, 2005). In those revisions, EPA
amended its regulations to provide that states participating in the
CAIR cap-and-trade programs pursuant to an EPA-approved CAIR SIP or
states that remain subject to a CAIR FIP need not require affected
BART-eligible electric generating units (EGUs) to install, operate, and
maintain BART for emissions of SO2 and nitrogen oxides
(NOX). As a result of EPA's determination that CAIR was
``better-than-BART,'' a number of states in the CAIR region, including
Georgia, relied on the CAIR cap-and-trade programs as an alternative to
BART for EGU emissions of SO2 and NOX in
designing their regional haze plans. These states also relied on CAIR
as an element of a long-term strategy (LTS) for achieving their
reasonable progress goals (RPGs) for their regional haze programs.
However, in 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) remanded CAIR to EPA without vacatur
to preserve the environmental benefits provided by CAIR. North Carolina
v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176, 1178 (D.C. Cir. 2008). On August 8, 2011 (76 FR
48208), acting on the D.C. Circuit's remand, EPA promulgated CSAPR to
replace CAIR and issued FIPs to implement the rule in CSAPR-subject
states.\2\ Implementation of CSAPR was scheduled to begin on January 1,
2012,
[[Page 19638]]
when CSAPR would have superseded the CAIR program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CAIR created regional cap-and-trade programs to reduce
SO2 and NOX emissions in 27 eastern states
(and the District of Columbia), including Georgia, that contributed
to downwind nonattainment or interfered with maintenance of the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS or the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
\2\ CSAPR requires 28 eastern states to limit their statewide
emissions of SO2 and/or NOX in order to
mitigate transported air pollution unlawfully impacting other
states' ability to attain or maintain four NAAQS: the 1997 ozone
NAAQS, the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS, and the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The CSAPR
emissions limitations are defined in terms of maximum statewide
``budgets'' for emissions of annual SO2, annual
NOX, and/or ozone-season NOX by each covered
state's large EGUs. The CSAPR state budgets are implemented in two
phases of generally increasing stringency, with the Phase 1 budgets
applying to emissions in 2015 and 2016 and the Phase 2 budgets
applying to emissions in 2017 and later years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to the D.C. Circuit's 2008 ruling that CAIR was ``fatally
flawed'' and its resulting status as a temporary measure following that
ruling, EPA could not fully approve regional haze plans to the extent
that they relied on CAIR to satisfy the BART requirement and the
requirement for a LTS sufficient to achieve the state-adopted RPGs. On
these grounds, EPA finalized a limited disapproval of Georgia's
regional haze plan on June 7, 2012 (77 FR 33642), and in the same
action, promulgated a FIP to replace reliance on CAIR with reliance on
CSAPR to address the deficiencies in Georgia's regional haze plan. EPA
finalized a limited approval of Georgia's regional haze plan on June
28, 2012 (77 FR 38501), as meeting the remaining applicable regional
haze requirements set forth in the CAA and the RHR.
In the June 7, 2012, limited disapproval action, EPA also amended
the RHR to provide that participation by a state's EGUs in a CSAPR
trading program for a given pollutant--either a CSAPR federal trading
program implemented through a CSAPR FIP or an integrated CSAPR state
trading program implemented through an approved CSAPR SIP revision--
qualifies as a BART alternative for those EGUs for that pollutant. See
40 CFR 51.308(e)(4). Since EPA promulgated this amendment, numerous
states covered by CSAPR have come to rely on the provision through
either SIPs or FIPs.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EPA has promulgated FIPs relying on CSAPR participation for
BART purposes for Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan,
Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia,
and West Virginia, 77 FR at 33654, and Nebraska, 77 FR 40150, 40151
(July 6, 2012). EPA has approved SIPs from several states relying on
CSAPR participation for BART purposes. See, e.g., 82 FR 47393
(October 12, 2017) for Alabama; 77 FR 34801 (June 12, 2012) for
Minnesota; and 77 FR 46952 (August 7, 2012) for Wisconsin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Numerous parties filed petitions for review of CSAPR in the D.C.
Circuit, and on August 21, 2012, the court issued its ruling, vacating
and remanding CSAPR to EPA and ordering continued implementation of
CAIR. EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 696 F.3d 7, 38 (D.C. Cir.
2012). The D.C. Circuit's vacatur of CSAPR was reversed by the United
States Supreme Court on April 29, 2014, and the case was remanded to
the D.C. Circuit to resolve remaining issues in accordance with the
high court's ruling. EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 134 S. Ct.
1584 (2014). On remand, the D.C. Circuit affirmed CSAPR in most
respects, but invalidated without vacating some of the CSAPR budgets as
to a number of states. EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 795 F.3d
118 (D.C. Cir. 2015). The remanded budgets include the Phase 2
SO2 emissions budgets for Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina,
and Texas and the Phase 2 ozone-season NOX budgets for 11
states. This litigation ultimately delayed implementation of CSAPR for
three years, from January 1, 2012, when CSAPR's cap-and-trade programs
were originally scheduled to replace the CAIR cap-and-trade programs,
to January 1, 2015. Thus, the rule's Phase 2 budgets that were
originally promulgated to begin on January 1, 2014, began on January 1,
2017.
On September 29, 2017 (82 FR 45481), EPA issued a final rule
affirming the continued validity of the Agency's 2012 determination
that participation in CSAPR meets the RHR's criteria for an alternative
to the application of source-specific BART.\4\ EPA has determined that
changes to CSAPR's geographic scope resulting from the actions EPA has
taken or expects to take in response to the D.C. Circuit's budget
remand do not affect the continued validity of participation in CSAPR
as a BART alternative, because the changes in geographic scope would
not have adversely affected the results of the air quality modeling
analysis upon which the EPA based the 2012 determination. EPA's
September 29, 2017, determination was based, in part, on EPA's final
action approving a SIP revision from Alabama (81 FR 59869 (August 31,
2016)) adopting Phase 2 annual NOX and SO2
budgets equivalent to the federally-developed budgets and on SIP
revisions submitted by Georgia and South Carolina to also adopt Phase 2
annual NOX and SO2 budgets equivalent to the
federally-developed budgets.\5\ Since that time, EPA has approved the
SIP revisions from Georgia and South Carolina. See 82 FR 47930 (October
13, 2017) and 82 FR 47936 (October 13, 2017), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Legal challenges to this rule are pending. Nat'l Parks
Conservation Ass'n v. EPA, No. 17-1253 (D.C. Cir. filed November 28,
2017).
\5\ EPA proposed to approve the Georgia and South Carolina SIP
revisions adopting CSAPR budgets on August 16, 2017 (82 FR 38866),
and August 10, 2017 (82 FR 37389), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A portion of Georgia's July 26, 2017, SIP submittal seeks to
correct the deficiencies identified in the June 7, 2012, limited
disapproval of its regional haze plan submitted on February 11, 2010,
and supplemented on November 19, 2010, by replacing reliance on CAIR
with reliance on CSAPR.\6\ Specifically, Georgia requests that EPA
amend the State's regional haze plan by replacing its reliance on CAIR
with CSAPR to satisfy SO2 and NOX BART
requirements and first implementation period SO2 reasonable
progress requirements for EGUs formerly subject to CAIR,\7\ and to
support the RPGs for the Class I areas in Georgia for the first
implementation period. EPA is approving the regional haze plan portion
of the SIP submittal and amending the SIP accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ On October 13, 2017, (82 FR 47930), EPA approved the
portions of the July 26, 2017, SIP submission incorporating into
Georgia's SIP the State's regulations requiring Georgia EGUs to
participate in CSAPR state trading programs for annual
NOX and SO2 emissions integrated with the
CSAPR federal trading programs and thus replacing the corresponding
FIP requirements. In the October 13, 2017, action, EPA did not take
any action regarding Georgia's request in this July 26, 2017, SIP
submission to revise the State's regional haze plan nor regarding
the prong 4 element of the 2008 8-hour ozone, 2010 1-hour
NO2, 2010 1-hour SO2, and 2012
PM2.5 NAAQS.
\7\ In its regional haze plan, Georgia concluded and EPA found
acceptable the State's determination that no additional controls
beyond CAIR are reasonable for SO2 for affected Georgia
EGUs for the first implementation period, with the exception of five
EGUs at three facilities owned by Georgia Power. See 77 FR 11464
(February 27, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Infrastructure SIPs
By statute, plans meeting the requirements of sections 110(a)(1)
and (2) of the CAA are to be submitted by states within three years (or
less, if the Administrator so prescribes) after promulgation of a new
or revised NAAQS to provide for the implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of the new or revised NAAQS. EPA has historically referred
to these SIP submissions made for the purpose of satisfying the
requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) as ``infrastructure
SIP'' submissions. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) require states to address
basic SIP elements such as for monitoring, basic program requirements,
and legal authority that are designed to assure attainment and
maintenance of the newly established or revised NAAQS. More
specifically, section 110(a)(1) provides the procedural and timing
requirements for infrastructure SIPs. Section 110(a)(2) lists specific
elements that states must meet for the infrastructure SIP requirements
related to a newly established or revised NAAQS. The contents of an
infrastructure SIP submission may vary depending upon the data and
analytical tools available to the state, as well as the provisions
already contained in the state's implementation plan at the time in
which the state develops and submits
[[Page 19639]]
the submission for a new or revised NAAQS.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For additional information regarding EPA's approach to the
review of infrastructure SIP submissions, see, e.g., 81 FR 57544
(August 23, 2016) (proposal to approve portions of Georgia's
infrastructure SIP for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 110(a)(2)(D) has two components: 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and
110(a)(2)(D)(ii). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) includes four distinct
components, commonly referred to as ``prongs,'' that must be addressed
in infrastructure SIP submissions. The first two prongs, which are
codified in section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), are provisions that prohibit
any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from
contributing significantly to nonattainment of the NAAQS in another
state (prong 1) and from interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS in
another state (prong 2). The third and fourth prongs, which are
codified in section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), are provisions that prohibit
emissions activity in one state from interfering with measures required
to prevent significant deterioration of air quality in another state
(prong 3) or from interfering with measures to protect visibility in
another state (prong 4). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) requires SIPs to
include provisions ensuring compliance with sections 115 and 126 of the
Act, relating to interstate and international pollution abatement.
A state can meet prong 4 requirements via confirmation in its
infrastructure SIP submission that the state has an approved regional
haze plan that fully meets the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308 or 51.309.
40 CFR 51.308 and 51.309 specifically require that a state
participating in a regional planning process include all measures
needed to achieve its apportionment of emission reduction obligations
agreed upon through that process. A fully approved regional haze plan
will ensure that emissions from sources under an air agency's
jurisdiction are not interfering with measures required to be included
in other air agencies' plans to protect visibility.
Georgia's May 14, 2012, 2008 8-hour Ozone submission; March 25,
2013, 2010 1-hour NO2 submission; October 22, 2013, 2010 1-
hour SO2 submission as supplemented on July 25, 2014; and
December 14, 2015, 2012 annual PM2.5 submission rely on the
State having a fully approved regional haze plan to satisfy its prong 4
requirements. EPA is approving the regional haze plan portion of the
State's July 26, 2017, SIP revision and converting EPA's previous
action on Georgia's regional haze plan from a limited approval/limited
disapproval to a full approval because final approval of this portion
of the SIP revision would correct the deficiencies that led to EPA's
limited approval/limited disapproval of the State's regional haze plan.
Specifically, EPA's approval of this portion of Georgia's July 26,
2017, SIP revision would satisfy the SO2 and NOX
BART requirements and SO2 reasonable progress requirements
for EGUs formerly subject to CAIR and the requirement that a LTS
include measures as necessary to achieve the State-adopted RPGs.
Because a state may satisfy prong 4 requirements through a fully
approved regional haze plan, EPA is also converting the Agency's
September 26, 2016, conditional approvals to full approvals of the
prong 4 portion of Georgia's May 14, 2012, 2008 8-hour Ozone
submission; March 25, 2013, 2010 1-hour NO2 submission;
October 22, 2013, 2010 1-hour SO2 submission as supplemented
on July 25, 2014; and December 14, 2015, 2012 annual PM2.5
submission.
In a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on February 2,
2018 (83 FR 4886), EPA proposed to take the following actions: (1)
Approve the regional haze plan portion of Georgia's July 26, 2017, SIP
submission to change reliance from CAIR to CSAPR; (2) convert EPA's
limited approval/limited disapproval of Georgia's February 11, 2010,
regional haze plan as supplemented on November 19, 2010, to a full
approval; (3) remove EPA's FIP for Georgia which replaced reliance on
CAIR with reliance on CSAPR to address the deficiencies identified in
the limited disapproval of Georgia's regional haze plan; and (4)
convert EPA's September 26, 2016, conditional approvals to full
approvals of the prong 4 portion of Georgia's May 14, 2012, 2008 8-hour
Ozone submission; March 25, 2013, 2010 1-hour NO2
submission; the State's October 22, 2013, 2010 1-hour SO2
submission as supplemented on July 25, 2014; and the State's December
14, 2015, 2012 annual PM2.5 submission. The details of
Georgia's submission and the rationale for EPA's actions are explained
in the NPRM. Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or before
March 5, 2018. EPA received no adverse comments on the proposed action.
II. Final Actions
As described above, EPA is taking the following actions: (1)
Approving the regional haze plan portion of Georgia's July 26, 2017,
SIP submission to change reliance from CAIR to CSAPR; (2) converting
EPA's limited approval/limited disapproval of Georgia's February 11,
2010, regional haze plan as supplemented on November 19, 2010, to a
full approval; (3) removing EPA's FIP for Georgia which replaced
reliance on CAIR with reliance on CSAPR to address the deficiencies
identified in the limited disapproval of Georgia's regional haze plan;
and (4) converting EPA's September 26, 2016, conditional approvals to
full approvals of the prong 4 portion of Georgia's May 14, 2012, 2008
8-hour Ozone submission; March 25, 2013, 2010 1-hour NO2
submission; the State's October 22, 2013, 2010 1-hour SO2
submission as supplemented on July 25, 2014; and the State's December
14, 2015, 2012 annual PM2.5 submission. All other applicable
infrastructure requirements for the infrastructure SIP submissions have
been or will be addressed in separate rulemakings.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. These actions merely
approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and do not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, these actions:
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Are not Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory actions because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Do not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Are not economically significant regulatory actions based
on health or
[[Page 19640]]
safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997);
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing these actions and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register.These actions are not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of these actions must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals
for the appropriate circuit by July 3, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of these actions for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. These actions may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate Matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: April 20, 2018.
Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart L--Georgia
Sec. 52.569 [Removed and Reserved]
0
2. Section 52.569 is removed and reserved.
0
3. Section 52.570(e) is amended by adding entries for ``110(a)(1) and
(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO2
NAAQS'', ``110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010
1-hour SO2 NAAQS'', ``110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS'', ``110(a)(1)
and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS'',
and ``Regional Haze Plan Revision'' at the end of the table to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.570 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Georgia Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
submittal
Name of nonregulatory SIP Applicable geographic or date/ EPA approval date Explanation
provision nonattainment area effective
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Georgia................. 3/25/2013 5/4/2018,.......... Addressing Prong 4
Requirements for the 2010 1- [Insert Federal only.
hour NO2 NAAQS. Register citation].
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Georgia................. 7/25/2014 5/4/2018,.......... Addressing Prong 4
Requirements for the 2010 1- [Insert Federal only.
hour SO2 NAAQS. Register citation].
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Georgia................. 12/14/2015 5/4/2018,.......... Addressing Prong 4
Requirements for the 2012 [Insert Federal only.
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Register citation].
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Georgia................. 5/14/2012 5/4/2018,.......... Addressing Prong 4
Requirements for the 2008 8- [Insert Federal only.
hour Ozone NAAQS. Register citation].
Regional Haze Plan Revision..... Georgia................. 7/26/2017 5/4/2018,.......... ..................
[Insert Federal
Register citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 19641]]
Sec. 52.580 [Removed and Reserved]
0
4. Section 52.580 is removed and reserved.
[FR Doc. 2018-09412 Filed 5-3-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P