[House Practice: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the House]
[Chapter 21. Division of the Question for Voting]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
[[Page 465]]
CHAPTER 21 - DIVISION OF THE QUESTION FOR VOTING
HOUSE PRACTICE
A. Generally
Sec. 1. In General; Form
Sec. 2. Tests of Divisibility
Sec. 3. Demanding a Division
B. Division of Particular Propositions
Sec. 4. In General
Sec. 5. Simple or Concurrent Resolutions
Sec. 6. -- Resolutions Naming Two or More Individuals
Sec. 7. -- Special Orders
Sec. 8. Amendments
Sec. 9. -- En Bloc Amendments
Sec. 10. Motions to Strike
Sec. 11. Motions to Strike and Insert
Sec. 12. Motions to Suspend the Rules
Sec. 13. Motions to Recommit; Motions to Instruct Conferees
Sec. 14. Motions to Table
Sec. 15. Senate Amendments
C. Consideration of Divided Propositions
Sec. 16. In General
Research References
5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6106-6162
8 Cannon Sec. Sec. 3163-3176
Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. Sec. 42-52
Manual Sec. Sec. 480-482, 919-921
[[Page 466]]
A. Generally
Sec. 1 . In General; Form
Under rule XVI clause 5, a question that consists of two or more
separable substantive propositions is subject to a division of the
question, if demanded, so as to obtain a separate vote on each
proposition. Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 42. The procedure is applicable
in the Committee of the Whole as well as in the House. See, e.g.,
Deschler-Brown Ch 29 Sec. 42.12.
The rule prohibits its application to special orders of business
from the Committee on Rules, to propositions electing Members to
standing or joint committees, and to a motion to strike and insert.
Manual Sec. 919. The entire rule may be suspended by the adoption of a
resolution from the Committee on Rules. 7 Cannon Sec. 775.
Sec. 2 . Tests of Divisibility
To be divided for a vote, a question must consist of at least two
separate and distinct propositions both grammatically and
substantively, so that if one proposition is rejected, a separate
proposition logically will remain. Manual Sec. 921; 8 Cannon
Sec. 3165; Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. Sec. 42.1, 42.3. In passing on a
demand for division, the Chair considers only the severability of the
propositions and not the merits of the question presented. 5 Hinds
Sec. 6122.
The requirement that there must be at least two substantive
propositions in order to justify division is strictly enforced. 5
Hinds Sec. Sec. 6108-6113. If either proposition, standing alone, is
not a distinct substantive proposition, the question is not divisible,
even though each portion is grammatically complete. 7 Cannon
Sec. Sec. 3165, 3167. However, in dividing a question into separate
propositions, some restructuring of the language used is in order.
Manual Sec. 921; 5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6114-6118.
Sec. 3 . Demanding a Division
A request for a division of the question does not require
unanimous consent, and no motion is made. Deschler-Brown Ch 30
Sec. 42.4. The Member seeking a division rises and addresses the
Chair:
Member: Mr. Speaker, I demand a division of the question.
Speaker: The gentleman will indicate the proposition(s) on which
he desires a separate vote. . . .
Speaker: The gentleman requests a division, and that portion of
the amendment will be divided for a separate vote.
[Or]
[[Page 467]]
Opponent: Mr. Speaker, I make the point of order that the question
is not susceptible of division, and that the portions indicated by
the gentleman do not constitute separate substantive propositions.
Speaker: The Chair will hear the gentleman.
A demand for a division of a question is in order even after the
previous question has been ordered. 5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 5468, 6149; 8
Cannon Sec. 3173. Under rule XVI clause 5, the demand for a division
is in order before the question is put to the House for a vote.
Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 42.4. The question may not be divided after
it has been put or after the yeas and nays have been ordered. 5 Hinds
Sec. Sec. 6160-6162. The demand is likewise untimely if the question
is one against which a point of order has been raised and is pending.
8 Cannon Sec. 3432.
A demand for a division of the question may be withdrawn. However,
this is permitted only by unanimous consent once the Chair has put the
question on the first portion to be voted on. Manual Sec. 921;
Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 42.11.
B. Division of Particular Propositions
Sec. 4 . In General
Generally; Distinction Between Bills and Resolutions
Whether a division of the question may be demanded depends on the
nature of the pending matter and on whether it meets the tests of
divisibility imposed by rule XVI. Sec. 2, supra. Certain House
resolutions--whether simple or concurrent--are subject to the demand
when the question is put on agreeing thereto. Sec. 5, infra. However,
bills and joint resolutions are not divisible on passage. A separate
vote may not be demanded on various provisions set forth in such a
measure or on its preamble. 5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6144-6147; 8 Cannon
Sec. 3172. When the previous question has been ordered on adoption of
a measure containing a series of simple resolutions, they may be
divided for a vote on demand. 5 Hinds Sec. 6149.
The question of engrossment and third reading of a bill under rule
XVI clause 8 is not subject to a demand for a division of the
question. Manual Sec. 943. Certain amendments, such as a compound
motion to strike (Sec. 10, infra), may be divided. However, most other
motions are not divisible. A motion for the previous question on a
proposition and an amendment thereto is not divisible. Manual
Sec. 996; Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 46.1. When the previous question
is ordered on a measure and a pending amendment, the vote comes first
on the amendment, then on the text as perfected or not.
[[Page 468]]
Appeals
There may be a division of the question on an appeal from a
decision of the Speaker if the decision involves two or more separate
and distinct questions. 5 Hinds Sec. 6157.
Sec. 5 . Simple or Concurrent Resolutions
A simple or concurrent resolution may be subject to a demand for a
division of the question if it satisfies the test of divisibility
imposed by rule XVI. Sec. 2, supra. Thus, a concurrent resolution on
the budget is subject to a demand for a division of the question if
the resolution grammatically and substantively relates to different
fiscal years or includes a separate, hortatory section having its own
grammatical and substantive meaning. Manual Sec. 921; Deschler-Brown
Ch 30 Sec. 42.5. It is in order to demand a division of the question
on agreeing to an impeachment resolution so as to obtain a separate
vote on each article. Manual Sec. 921; 6 Cannon Sec. 545.
To be subject to a demand for a division of the question, a
resolution must present two or more separate and distinct substantive
propositions. It has been held that a resolution (1) censuring a
Member and (2) adopting the committee report recommending such censure
on the basis of the committee's findings is not divisible because
these questions are substantively equivalent. Deschler-Brown Ch 30
Sec. 42.2. An adjournment resolution that also authorizes the receipt
of veto messages from the President during the adjournment is not
subject to a division of the question, as the receipt authority would
be nonsensical standing alone. Manual Sec. 921.
It is not in order to demand a division of the question on matters
that are merely incorporated by reference in the pending resolution.
For example, when a resolution to adopt a series of rules, referred to
but not made a part of the resolution, is before the House, it is not
in order to demand a separate vote on each rule. 5 Hinds Sec. 6159.
Sec. 6 . -- Resolutions Naming Two or More Individuals
Under rule XVI clause 5, a resolution electing Members to standing
or joint committees is not divisible. However, other types of
resolutions relating to two or more named individuals may be divided
for the purpose of voting. Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 49. For example,
a resolution confirming the nomination of certain individuals to
executive branch offices is subject to a division of the question so
as to obtain a separate vote on each nominee. Deschler-Brown Ch 30
Sec. 49.2. A resolution with two resolve clauses separately certifying
the contemptuous conduct of two individuals is divisible. Manual
Sec. 921. Similarly, a resolution with one resolve clause certifying
[[Page 469]]
contemptuous conduct of several individuals may be divisible. Manual
Sec. 299. But see, Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 49.1.
A resolution relating to two or more named individuals may be
divided even though that may require a grammatical reconstruction of
the text. 5 Hinds Sec. 6121. A word that is a mere formality, such as
``resolved,'' is sometimes supplied by interpretation of the Chair. 5
Hinds Sec. Sec. 6114-6118.
Sec. 7 . -- Special Orders
Under rule XVI clause 5, resolutions reported from the Committee
on Rules providing a special order of business are not divisible.
However, other types of special rules from that committee are subject
to a demand for a division where the resolution contains separate and
distinct substantive propositions. For example, a resolution reported
from that committee establishing two or more select committees is
subject to a demand for a division of the question. Manual Sec. 921.
Sec. 8 . Amendments
Generally
Rule XVI clause 5 permits a division of the question on an
amendment on the demand of any Member where the amendment is properly
divisible into two or more substantive propositions. A division is in
order on an amendment if the amendment contains propositions so
distinct in substance that, one being taken away, a substantive
proposition remains. Manual Sec. 921; Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 42.13.
Thus, an amendment offered to an appropriation bill providing that no
part of the appropriation may be paid to named individuals may be
divided for a separate vote on each name. Deschler-Brown Ch 30
Sec. 49.4. An amendment in the form of a motion to strike and insert
is not divisible. See Sec. 11, infra.
Amendments Taken Up in Committee of the Whole
The rule permitting a division of the question is applicable to an
amendment (other than a motion to strike and insert) consisting of two
or more substantive propositions under consideration in the Committee
of the Whole. Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 43. A request for a division
of the question on such an amendment may be made at any time before
the Chair puts the question thereon. 5 Hinds Sec. 6162. An amendment
reported to the House from the Committee of the Whole as a discrete
amendment is not subject to a division of the question in the House. 4
Hinds Sec. Sec. 4883-4892; generally, see Committees of the Whole.
[[Page 470]]
Perfecting Amendments; Substitute Amendments
An amendment adding language to the pending text is divisible if
the language to be added contains two or more distinct propositions. 5
Hinds Sec. Sec. 6129, 6133. However, an amendment in the nature of a
substitute is not subject to a demand for a division of the question.
5 Hinds Sec. 6127; 8 Cannon Sec. 3168. The division of a motion to
strike and insert is precluded by House rule. Sec. 11, infra.
A division of the question may be demanded on an amendment before
amendments are adopted thereto, or on the amendment as amended
(assuming that perfecting amendments or an adopted substitute do not
destroy the divisibility of the amendment as amended). Manual
Sec. 921.
A negative vote on a motion to strike a portion of a pending
amendment does not prevent a demand for a division of that portion of
the amendment if it is a separate proposition and therefore properly
severable. Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 43.1.
Sec. 9 . -- En Bloc Amendments
Consideration of several amendments en bloc by unanimous consent
or otherwise does not prevent a division of the question from being
demanded so as to obtain a separate vote on one of the amendments.
Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. Sec. 43.4-43.6. In fact, a Member may be
permitted to offer several amendments en bloc and then demand a
division of the question for a separate vote on each one. Deschler-
Brown Ch 30 Sec. 43.4. However, amendments en bloc proposing only to
transfer appropriations among objects in a general appropriation bill
(without increasing the levels of budget authority or outlays in the
bill), when considered en bloc pursuant to rule XXI clause 2(f), are
not subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or
in the Committee of the Whole.
Sec. 10 . Motions to Strike
A motion to strike various separate provisions of a pending
proposition may be divided for purposes of voting. 8 Cannon Sec. 3166.
Thus, an amendment proposing to strike two or more sections of a
pending amendment may be divided in order to obtain separate votes on
the proposal to strike each section. Manual Sec. 921. However, an
amendment proposing to strike a provision in a bill--and to
redesignate subsequent paragraphs accordingly--is not subject to a
demand for a division because it contains only one substantive
proposition. 93-2, Dec. 10, 1974, p 38746. A motion to strike is not
grammatically divisible. However, where there is pending a motion to
strike a pending provision, a perfecting amendment to the underlying
text may be
[[Page 471]]
offered to strike a lesser portion of the provision; and the
perfecting amendment is voted on first. Deschler Ch 27
Sec. Sec. 17.26, 24.13.
Sec. 11 . Motions to Strike and Insert
Although a motion to insert may be divisible (Sec. 8, supra), the
division of a motion to strike and insert is precluded by rule XVI
clause 5(c). Manual Sec. 920. The indivisibility of a motion to strike
and insert under clause 5(c) operates not only between the branches of
the motion but also within each branch. 8 Cannon Sec. 3169; see also 5
Hinds Sec. 6124. An amendment comprising two discrete instructions to
strike and insert may be divided. Manual Sec. 921.
A simple motion to strike may not be offered as a substitute for a
motion to strike certain words and insert others, as that would have
the effect of dividing the motion to strike and insert. Manual
Sec. 920.
Sec. 12 . Motions to Suspend the Rules
A question being considered pursuant to a motion to suspend the
rules may not be divided for a vote. 5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6141-6143; 8
Cannon Sec. 3171. Although a proposition may be subject to a division
of the question under rule XVI, it cannot be divided if rule XVI is
suspended. 5 Hinds Sec. 6143; generally, see Suspension of Rules.
Sec. 13 . Motions to Recommit; Motions to Instruct Conferees
A motion to recommit with instructions is not subject to a demand
for a division of the question. It is not in order to demand a
separate vote even where the motion includes separate branches of
instructions to the reporting committee. Manual Sec. 921; 5 Hinds
Sec. Sec. 6134-6137; 8 Cannon Sec. 3170. However, an amendment
reported forthwith pursuant to instructions contained in a successful
motion to recommit may be divided on the question of its adoption if
composed of substantively and grammatically distinct propositions.
Manual Sec. 921.
Instructions in a motion to recommit a conference report may not
be divided. Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 45.2. However, a division has
been permitted under rule XXII clause 7(c) (which permits multiple
motions to instruct after the conferees have failed to report for 20
calendar days and 10 legislative days), provided separate substantive
propositions are presented. Manual Sec. 921.
[[Page 472]]
Sec. 14 . Motions to Table
Because a motion to lay on the table is a summary motion, its only
purpose being to defeat the pending proposition, it has been held that
the motion to table is not subject to a demand for a division of the
question. 5 Hinds Sec. 6140. A division of the question is not in
order even if the motion is applicable to two or more separate and
distinct propositions, such as a series of resolutions. 5 Hinds
Sec. 6138. A motion to table a resolution and pending amendments is
likewise indivisible. 5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6139, 6140.
Sec. 15 . Senate Amendments
Generally; Motions to Concur
On the question of agreeing or disagreeing to a Senate amendment,
it is not in order to demand a division so as to vote separately on
different portions of the amendment. 5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6151, 6156. The
amendment must be voted on as a whole. 8 Cannon Sec. 3175. However,
when two or more Senate amendments are considered en bloc in the
House, a separate vote may be had on each amendment. 8 Cannon
Sec. Sec. 2383, 2400, 3191. After the stage of disagreement, rule XXII
clause 10 permits separate votes on rejecting nongermane portions of
Senate amendments. See Germaneness of Amendments.
Motions to Concur with an Amendment
A House amendment proposed in a motion to concur in a Senate
amendment with an amendment is divisible if the proposed House
amendment is in divisible form. Manual Sec. 921. However, such a
motion may not be divided between concurring and amending. 8 Cannon
Sec. 3176.
A proposed House amendment to a Senate amendment is not divisible
if the House amendment is in the form of a motion to strike and
insert, as such motions are specifically indivisible under House rule.
Deschler-Brown Ch 30 Sec. 48; Sec. 11, supra.
Motions to Recede and Concur
A division may be demanded on a motion to recede from disagreement
and concur in a Senate amendment. 5 Hinds Sec. 6209; 8 Cannon
Sec. Sec. 3197-3199. The question having been divided and the House
having receded, a motion to amend takes precedence over the motion to
concur (5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6209-6211; 8 Cannon Sec. 3198), even after
the previous question has been ordered on both motions (Manual
Sec. 525).
[[Page 473]]
C. Consideration of Divided Propositions
Sec. 16 . In General
Amendment and Debate; Putting the Question
Where a division of the question has been demanded on separable
portions of a proposition subject to amendment, an amendment to any of
those portions may be offered until the Chair puts the question on the
first portion. 94-2, Sept. 9, 1976, p 29530. Even after a vote has
been taken on the first portion, the second is open to debate and
amendment unless the previous question is ordered. Manual Sec. 921.
Where a division of the question is demanded on a separable
portion of an amendment, the Chair puts the question first on the
remaining portion of the amendment, and that portion on which a
division is demanded may remain open for further debate and amendment.
Manual Sec. 482. If a division of the question is demanded on more
than one portion of an amendment, the Chair may put the question first
on the unaffected portions of the amendment (if any), then (after
further debate) on the first part on which a division is requested,
and then (after further debate) on the subsequent divisible portions.
Manual Sec. 921. Where neither portion of a divided question remains
open to further debate or amendment, the question may be put first on
the portion identified by the demand for division and then on the
remainder. Manual Sec. 921.
Where the question on adopting an amendment is divided by special
rule (rather than on demand from the floor), the Chair puts the
question on each divided portion of the amendment in the order in
which it appears. Manual Sec. 921.
Voting
A question having been divided for a vote, the vote may be taken
by one of the voting methods authorized by the House rules, such as a
voice vote, division vote, or record vote. See Voting. The motion to
reconsider applies separately to each portion of the divided question
and continues to be available even after disposition of a motion to
reconsider only one portion of the divided question. However,
frequently the motion to reconsider each portion is laid on the table
en bloc by unanimous consent. 5 Hinds Sec. 5609; 105-2, Dec. 19, 1998,
p ____.