[House Practice: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the House]
[Chapter 37. Points of Order; Parliamentary Inquiries]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
[[Page 661]]
CHAPTER 37 - POINTS OF ORDER; PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRIES
HOUSE PRACTICE
A. Points of Order
Sec. 1. In General; Form
Sec. 2. Role of the Chair
Sec. 3. Reserving Points of Order
Sec. 4. Time to Raise Points of Order
Sec. 5. -- Against Bills and Resolutions
Sec. 6. -- Against Amendments
Sec. 7. Application to Particular Questions; Grounds
Sec. 8. Relation to Other Business
Sec. 9. Debate on Points of Order; Burden of Proof
Sec. 10. Waiver of Points of Order
Sec. 11. Withdrawal of Points of Order
Sec. 12. Appeals
B. Parliamentary Inquiries
Sec. 13. In General
Sec. 14. Subjects of Inquiry
Sec. 15. Timeliness of Inquiry
Sec. 16. As Related to Other Business
Research References
5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6863-6975
8 Cannon Sec. Sec. 3427-3458
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. Sec. 14, 15
Manual Sec. Sec. 627-629, 641, 971
A. Points of Order
Sec. 1 . In General; Form
Generally
A point of order is an objection that the pending matter or
proceeding is in violation of a rule of the House. For a discussion of
grounds for points
[[Page 662]]
of order, see Sec. 7, infra. Any Member, Delegate, or the Resident
Commissioner may make a point of order. 6 Cannon Sec. 240. There have
been rare instances in which the Speaker has insisted that a point of
order be reduced to writing. 5 Hinds Sec. 6865. However, the customary
practice is for the Member to rise and address the Chair as follows:
Member: Mr. Speaker (or Mr. Chairman), I make a point of order
against the [amendment, section, paragraph].
Chair: The Chair will hear the gentleman.
It is appropriate for the Chair to determine whether the point of
order is being raised under a particular rule of the House. A Member
should state a point of order explicitly, identifying the
objectionable language. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. Sec. 2.2, 2.3. On
occasion, a Member has incorrectly demanded the ``regular order,''
rather than make a point of order to assert, for example, that remarks
are not confined to the question under debate. In such a case, the
Chair may treat the demand as a point of order and rule thereon.
Manual Sec. 628.
The proper method for opposing a point of order is to seek
recognition for that purpose at the proper time, not by making a point
of order against the point of order. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 7.3.
Effect
Where a point of order against the consideration of a bill is
sustained, the bill is recommitted to the reporting committee or to
its place on the appropriate calendar. See, e.g., Manual Sec. 841.
However, if the defect were a technical error in the report, the
measure could be returned to the calendar by the filing of a
supplemental report pursuant to rule XIII clause 3(a)(2). Manual
Sec. 838; 7 Cannon Sec. 869. If a bill is on the wrong calendar and
the Chair sustains a point of order against it for that reason, the
bill is placed on the appropriate calendar. 4 Hinds Sec. 4382.
If, during the consideration of a bill, a Member raises a point of
order against certain language in a pending measure and the Chair
sustains the point of order, the language is automatically stricken
from the measure. 7 Cannon Sec. 2148.
Under the former practice it was necessary for a Member on the
floor to reserve points of order against appropriation bills before
resolving into the Committee of the Whole, but this practice was
eliminated in 1995 when the House adopted rule XXI clause 1. Under
clause 1, points of order on general appropriation bills are
``considered as reserved,'' which permits the Committee to remove
language in a bill referred to it by the House that violates House
rules. Manual Sec. 1035.
[[Page 663]]
A point of order against any part of an amendment, if sustained,
is sufficient to invalidate the entire amendment. 5 Hinds Sec. 5784. A
point of order may be directed against an entire section or paragraph
of a bill (depending on whether the bill is read by paragraph or by
section). It also may be precisely aimed at a subpart thereof.
However, the entire section or paragraph is vulnerable; and if a point
of order is sustained against a portion of a pending provision, the
entire provision may be ruled out of order unless prevented by a
special order. 5 Hinds Sec. 6883; Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. Sec. 1.24,
1.25. The stricken provision's headings and subheadings are likewise
eliminated. 8 Cannon Sec. 2353. Provisions ruled out on points of
order in the Committee of the Whole are not reported to the House. 4
Hinds Sec. 4906; 8 Cannon Sec. 2428.
Multiple Points of Order
The Chair may entertain simultaneously more than one point of
order against a paragraph. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 1.8. As a rule
the Chair will decline to decide a point of order raised against a
proposition until all other points of order on the same proposition
have been submitted. 8 Cannon Sec. 2310. Indeed, the Chair may in his
discretion require all points of order against a pending proposition
for alleged violation of a particular House rule to be stated at the
same time. This procedure allows the Chair to rule separately on each
point of order in such order as he determines, or to permit the Chair
to sustain one valid point of order without reaching the others.
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 4.18. Thus, where several points of order
are made against an amendment and the Chair sustains one of them, he
need not rule on the remaining points of order, as the amendment is no
longer pending. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 1.12. Where the Chair
entertains two points of order against a provision, he may sustain
only one of them, even though both points of order are conceded by the
manager of the bill. Manual Sec. 628.
Cross References
Points of order based on particular rules or against particular
propositions are addressed elsewhere in many other chapters in this
work, such as Amendments; Appropriations; Consideration and Debate;
and Germaneness of Amendments.
Sec. 2 . Role of the Chair
Generally
Under rule I clause 5, the Speaker decides ``all questions of
order, subject to appeal by a Member, Delegate, or Resident
Commissioner.'' Manual
[[Page 664]]
Sec. 627. When a Speaker pro tempore occupies the Chair, he decides
questions of order. When the House is in Committee of the Whole, the
Chairman decides most questions of order independently of the Speaker.
5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6927, 6928. At the organization of a new Congress,
before the election of a Speaker, questions of order are decided by
the Clerk. Rule II clause 2(a); 1 Hinds Sec. 64.
The Chair may examine the form of an offered amendment to
determine its propriety and may rule it out of order even where no
point of order is raised from the floor. Deschler-Brown Ch 31
Sec. 6.11. Ordinarily, however, the Chair will rule out a proposition
only when a point of order is raised and only when he is required
under the circumstances to respond to the point of order. Deschler-
Brown Ch 31 Sec. 1.6. It is not the duty of the Speaker to decide any
question that is not directly presented in the course of the
proceedings of the House. 2 Hinds Sec. 1314; see Consideration and
Debate. However, it is the duty of the Chair to initiate the call to
order of a Member who engages in improper references to the actions of
the Senate, its Members, or its committees, or to the President.
Manual Sec. Sec. 374, 961.
The Speaker may decline to rule on a point of order until he has
had time for examination and study. 3 Hinds Sec. 2725; 8 Cannon
Sec. Sec. 2174, 2396. In reaching a decision on a point of order, the
Chair may hear argument. Manual Sec. 628.
Only on rare occasions has the Speaker submitted a question to the
House itself for a decision, preferring to rule subject to appeal by
any Member under rule I clause 5. Manual Sec. 628; 4 Hinds
Sec. Sec. 3282, 4930; 5 Hinds Sec. 5323.
Where the House has adopted an order permitting only certain
amendments to be offered to a bill during its consideration in
Committee of the Whole, the Chair is guided by the explicit
unambiguous language of the rule, rather than by the intention of the
Committee on Rules, in ruling whether a specific amendment is in the
permitted class. Manual Sec. 628. The Member offering an amendment in
the Committee of the Whole pursuant to a special order of the House
has the burden of proving that it meets the description of the
amendment made in order. The Chair has advised the Committee that an
amendment made in order was described by subject matter rather than by
prescribed text and that the pending amendment fit such description.
Manual Sec. 993.
The Chair may consider argument on the meaning of an amendment in
resolving any ambiguity in the language of the amendment when ruling
on a point of order against it. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 8.9.
[[Page 665]]
Consideration of Prior Rulings; Reversals
A decision by the Speaker or Chairman is a precedent in resolving
subsequent disputes where the same point of order is again in
controversy. In looking to precedents to resolve a point of order, the
House is applying a doctrine known in the courts as stare decisis,
under which a judge looks to earlier cases involving the same question
of law. In the same way, the House adheres to settled rulings and will
not lightly disturb rationales that have been established by prior
decision of the Chair. 2 Hinds Sec. 1317; 6 Cannon Sec. 248. However,
although the Chair will normally not disregard a decision previously
made on the same facts, such precedents may be examined,
distinguished, and even overruled where shown to be erroneous. 4 Hinds
Sec. 4637; 8 Cannon Sec. Sec. 2794, 3435. Indeed, the Chair may after
further argument reverse his own ruling on a point of order, for
example, where existing law not previously called to the Chair's
attention would justify the opposite ruling. 8 Cannon Sec. 3435;
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 1.5. The authoritative sources for proper
interpretations of the rules are statements made directly from the
Chair and not comments made by the Speaker in other contexts. Manual
Sec. 628.
Sec. 3 . Reserving Points of Order
Generally
With certain exceptions, a point of order against a proposition
may be held untimely if it is not made until after debate on the
proposition has begun. Sec. 4, infra. It is therefore not an uncommon
practice for a Member to reserve a point of order against an amendment
and then, after debate on the amendment, either press or withdraw the
point of order. 8 Cannon Sec. 3430. Reserving points of order against
amendments, see Amendments.
The reservation of a point of order against an amendment is
permitted at the discretion of the Chair and does not require
unanimous consent. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 3.16. A Member wishing to
reserve a point of order must rise and address the Chair. The Member
may not reserve a point of order merely through private agreement with
the Member in charge of the bill. 5 Hinds Sec. 6867. The reserving
Member need not specify the basis of his reservation. Deschler-Brown
Ch 31 Sec. 3.8. However, merely reserving the ``right to object'' to
engage in a colloquy before making a point of order does not
constitute the reservation of a point of order. 92-2, Apr. 18, 1972, p
13114.
[[Page 666]]
Effect of Withdrawal
The reservation of a point of order being withdrawn, another
Member may immediately renew it or press a point of order. Deschler-
Brown Ch 31 Sec. Sec. 3.21-3.23. Withdrawal of points of order
generally, see Sec. 11, infra.
Sec. 4 . Time to Raise Points of Order
Generally
Unless otherwise provided by the rules of the House, a point of
order against a proposition should be made when the proposition is
presented for consideration, not after such consideration has begun. 5
Hinds Sec. 6888. This principle is applied to points of order against
bills and resolutions as well as to points of order against various
motions, such as the motion to recommit. A point of order against a
motion to recommit a bill must be made after the motion is read and
comes too late after there has been debate thereon. Deschler-Brown Ch
31 Sec. 4.25. A point of order against a report involving the
privileges of the House is properly raised after the report is read.
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 4.5.
Under the rules of the House, certain points of order may be
raised ``at any time.'' For example, a point of order may be raised
``at any time'' under rule XXI clause 4, which prohibits the inclusion
of appropriations in a bill reported by a legislative committee.
Manual Sec. 1065. A point of order may likewise be raised ``at any
time'' under rule XXI clause 5(a), which prohibits inclusion of a tax
or tariff measure in a bill or joint resolution reported by a
committee that does not have jurisdiction over such measure. Manual
Sec. 1066. Such a point of order may be directed against language in a
bill or against an amendment containing such language. In the former
case, the point of order should be raised during the reading for
amendment under the five-minute rule. Deschler Ch 25 Sec. 12.14. In
the latter case, the point of order should be raised before
disposition of the amendment. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 5.29.
Effect of Intervening Debate
A point of order against a proposition ordinarily will be ruled
out as untimely if debate on the merits of the proposition already has
begun. 5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6891-6901; 8 Cannon Sec. 3440. However, the
Chair will not permit brief debate to preclude a point of order by a
Member who had diligently sought recognition for that purpose. 5 Hinds
Sec. 6906. The Chair may recognize for a point of order against
language in a bill notwithstanding intervening debate where the Member
raising the point of order was on his feet, seeking recognition,
before debate began. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 6.39. In
[[Page 667]]
deed, a Member who is on his feet seeking recognition at the proper
time to make a point of order may be recognized by the Chair, even
though the Clerk has read past the language to which the point of
order applies. Deschler-Brown Ch 29 Sec. 20.33. However, the mere fact
that a Member was on his feet does not entitle him to make a point of
order where he has not affirmatively sought recognition at the time
the relevant language was read for amendment. Deschler-Brown Ch 31
Sec. 5.25.
Effect of Intervening Amendments
A point of order against a proposition ordinarily is untimely if
raised after an amendment to the proposition has been offered. 5 Hinds
Sec. Sec. 6907-6911; 8 Cannon Sec. 3443. The point of order may be
precluded even by a pro forma amendment. 8 Cannon Sec. 3445.
Points of order against a bill or portion thereof are considered
by the Chair before the Chair recognizes Members to offer amendments.
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 5.1. If a bill is considered read and open
to amendment at any point by unanimous consent, points of order should
be stated before any amendments are offered. Deschler-Brown Ch 31
Sec. 5.5.
Although the reservation of a point of order by one Member inures
to all Members who may then make the point of order when recognized by
the Chair, withdrawal of a reservation by one Member requires other
Members to either make or continue to reserve the point of order at
that point, and a further reservation comes too late after there has
been subsequent debate. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 3.24.
Sec. 5 . -- Against Bills and Resolutions
Where a point of order against a measure would, if sustained,
prevent its consideration, the appropriate time to make the point of
order is when the measure is called up in the House or pending the
motion or declaration to resolve into the Committee of the Whole,
whichever procedure represents initial consideration of the measure. 8
Cannon Sec. 2252. A Member may not insist on a point of order against
the consideration of a bill where the manager of the bill withdraws
the motion that the House resolve itself into the Committee of the
Whole for consideration of the bill. The point of order must be made
anew if and when the motion is again made to resolve into Committee
for consideration of that bill. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 4.6.
Although uncommon, a point of order challenging, for example, the
privileged status of a resolution may be raised when the resolution is
called up and before it is read. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 4.1. A
point of order relating to the manner in which a resolution should be
considered should be made before such consideration begins. 5 Hinds
Sec. 6890. A point of order
[[Page 668]]
that the text of a privileged resolution does not reflect the action
of the reporting committee comes too late after there has been debate
on the resolution. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 4.4.
Sec. 6 . -- Against Amendments
A point of order is properly made or reserved immediately after
the reading of an amendment or following agreement to a unanimous-
consent request that an amendment be considered as read. Deschler-
Brown Ch 31 Sec. 6.5. It should be disposed of before amendments to
that amendment are offered. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 6.14. Once the
amendment is agreed to in the Committee of the Whole and reported to
the House, it is too late to raise a point of order against it, the
proper time having been at the point the amendment was offered in
Committee. 92-2, June 1, 1972, pp 19479, 19481, 19483. Generally, see
Amendments.
Sec. 7 . Application to Particular Questions; Grounds
A point of order ordinarily must be based on an objection that the
pending matter or proceeding is in violation of some rule of the
House. The Chair will ascertain and identify the particular rule being
invoked when ruling on a point of order. 98-2, Oct. 2, 1984, p 28522.
Although questions of order arising under the rules are determined
by the Chair, the Chair does not:
Recognize for requests to suspend the rule governing
admissions to the floor. Rule IV clause 1; 5 Hinds Sec. 7285.
Rule on the sufficiency of committee reports or legal effect
of language therein. Deschler Ch 19 Sec. 7.17.
Rule on questions of constitutionality, including the
constitutional powers of the House. Manual Sec. 628; 2 Hinds
Sec. Sec. 1255, 1318-1320; 8 Cannon Sec. Sec. 2225, 3031, 3071,
3427; Deschler Ch 19 Sec. Sec. 7.1-7.3, 8.10.
Pass on the merits of a legislative proposition. Deschler Ch
19 Sec. 7.4.
Rule on the consistency of amendments or other proposed
actions of the House. 2 Hinds Sec. Sec. 1327-1336; 8 Cannon
Sec. Sec. 3237, 3458; Deschler Ch 19 Sec. Sec. 7.5, 8.6-8.9.
Construe the legislative or legal effect of a proposition.
Manual Sec. 628; 8 Cannon Sec. Sec. 2280, 2841; Deschler Ch 19
Sec. 7.16.
Construe the general meaning or effect of an amendment or rule
on whether it is ambiguous. Deschler Ch 19 Sec. Sec. 8.1-8.5.
Rule on hypothetical questions. 6 Cannon Sec. Sec. 249, 253;
Deschler Ch 19 Sec. Sec. 7.6-7.8.
Rule on the propriety or expediency of a proposed course of
action. 2 Hinds Sec. Sec. 1275, 1337.
Consider contingencies that may arise in the future. 7 Cannon
Sec. 1409.
[[Page 669]]
Interpret a special order before it is adopted by the House.
Manual Sec. 628.
Determine issues not presented in a point of order. Deschler
Ch 19 Sec. 6.1.
Construe the result of a vote. Deschler Ch 6 Sec. 4.28.
Interpret the rules or procedures of the Senate. Deschler Ch
19 Sec. 7.19.
The Speaker, and not the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole,
rules on the propriety of amendments included in a motion to recommit
with instructions. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 1.46
Sec. 8 . Relation to Other Business
When a point of order is raised against a proposition,
consideration of that proposition is precluded until the point of
order is disposed of. The Chair should rule on the point of order
before proceeding to other questions, such as the method of voting on
the pending matter. 8 Cannon Sec. 3432.
A timely point of order takes precedence over a parliamentary
inquiry, and the deferral of a parliamentary inquiry gives no priority
for that purpose, since recognition is in the discretion of the Chair.
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 11.4.
An amendment may not be offered to a proposition against which a
point of order is pending. 8 Cannon Sec. 2824. The previous question
may not be demanded on a proposition until the point of order is
resolved. 8 Cannon Sec. Sec. 2681, 3433. Debate on the merits of the
proposition is likewise precluded. 5 Hinds Sec. 5055; 8 Cannon
Sec. 2556.
Sec. 9 . Debate on Points of Order; Burden of Proof
In General; Recognition
Recognition for debate on a point of order is extended at the
discretion of the Chair. 8 Cannon Sec. Sec. 3446-3448. Members seeking
to be heard must address the Chair separately and may not engage in
``colloquies'' on the point of order. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 7.17.
The time allowed for debate on a point of order is likewise within the
discretion of the Chair. A Member speaking on a point of order does
not control a fixed amount of time that he can reserve or yield. 5
Hinds Sec. 6919. Where a point of order is conceded by the manager of
the bill, the Chair may sustain the point of order without debate.
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 7.20.
Scope of Debate
The rule that debate on questions of order must be relevant is
strictly construed. 8 Cannon Sec. 3449. Debate is limited to the
question of order and may not go to the merits of the proposition
being considered. Manual Sec. 628.
[[Page 670]]
The Chair will not entertain unanimous-consent requests to permit
Members to revise and extend their remarks on points of order.
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 7.21. However, by unanimous consent, a
Member may be allowed to revise and extend his remarks to follow the
ruling on the point of order. Manual Sec. 628.
Burden of Proof
The proponents of an amendment have the burden of proof where a
point of order is raised against the amendment on the grounds that it
is not germane or that it proposes an unauthorized appropriation. 7
Cannon Sec. 1179; 8 Cannon Sec. 2995. Under House practice, those
defending an item in an appropriation bill have the burden of showing
the law authorizing it. 4 Hinds Sec. 3597; 7 Cannon Sec. Sec. 1179,
1276; 8 Cannon Sec. 2387. Thus, a point of order having been raised,
the burden of proving the authorization for language carried in an
appropriation bill falls on the managers of the bill as proponents of
the language. Deschler Ch 26 Sec. 9.4. Similarly, the proponent of an
amendment carries the burden of proving that the amendment does not
increase levels of budget authority or outlays within the meaning of
clause 2(f) of rule XXI. 107-1, Oct. 11, 2001, p ____.
Where a point of order is raised against consideration of a bill
on the ground that the report thereon does not adequately reflect all
changes in existing law as required by rule XIII clause 3(e)--the
Ramseyer rule--the proponent of the point of order has the burden of
proof and must cite the specific statute that will be affected by the
pending bill; in the absence of such citation the point will not be
entertained. 8 Cannon Sec. 2246.
Sec. 10 . Waiver of Points of Order
Generally
A point of order is effectively waived when it is not timely
raised. Where a motion that might have been subject to objection is,
in the absence of a point of order, agreed to, it represents the will
of the House and governs its procedure until the House orders
otherwise. Deschler Ch 11 Sec. 3.2. Points of order may be waived by
unanimous consent, by special rule, or by consideration of a measure
under suspension of the rules. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 9.
By Special Rule
Special ``rules'' or resolutions from the Committee on Rules
providing for the consideration of a bill often contain provisions
expressly waiving points of order against the bill or certain language
therein or amendments to be offered thereto. 7 Cannon Sec. 769. A
resolution waiving points of order
[[Page 671]]
against a certain provision in a bill has been agreed to by the House,
even after general debate on the bill has concluded and reading for
amendment has begun. Deschler Ch 21 Sec. 23.29. Such waivers are not
implied merely by the fact that the special rule provides for
consideration of the bill. 98-1, Mar. 22, 1983, p 6502.
A special rule may limit its waiver to a single point of order
against consideration of a measure or against its provisions, or it
may be so drafted as to constitute a blanket waiver of all points of
order. Where a resolution providing for the consideration of a bill
specifies that ``all points of order against said bill are hereby
waived,'' the waiver is applicable only to the provisions of the bill
and not to amendments. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 9.10. A special order
providing for consideration of a measure may waive all points of order
against provisions of the bill except specified text. Such a special
order may include language to prevent a point of order against the
vulnerable text from being applied to the remainder of a paragraph or
section. See, e.g., 107-1, H. Res. 192, July 17, 2001, p ____.
A special rule containing a waiver of section 425 of the
Congressional Budget Act (unfunded intergovernmental mandates) is
subject to a point of order under section 426 of that Act.
For further discussion, see Special Orders of Business. See also
Consideration and Debate.
Sec. 11 . Withdrawal of Points of Order
A point of order may be withdrawn at any time before the Chair
rules. 8 Cannon Sec. 3430. Once withdrawn, the point of order may
immediately be renewed by another Member. 5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6875,
6906; 8 Cannon Sec. Sec. 3429, 3430. As a rule, a point of order must
be pressed, or further reserved, when the Chair inquires whether the
objecting Member wishes to insist upon it, and comes too late after
that Member has stated that he does not insist on, or continue to
reserve, his point of order, and further debate has intervened.
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 3.14.
Sec. 12 . Appeals
Under rule I clause 5, a ruling of the Chair on a point of order
may be subject to challenge through an appeal by a Member. Manual
Sec. Sec. 627, 629; 5 Hinds Sec. Sec. 6938, 6939. An appeal also may
be taken from the ruling of the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole
on a point of order. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 13.3. However, a
decision on a question of order is not subject to an appeal if the
decision falls within the discretionary authority
[[Page 672]]
of the Chair. For a complete discussion of appeals from rulings of the
Chair, see Appeals.
B. Parliamentary Inquiries
Sec. 13 . In General
Recognition of Members for the purpose of propounding
parliamentary inquiries is within the discretion of the Chair. 6
Cannon Sec. 541. Inquiries concerning the parliamentary situation on
the floor are properly directed to the Chair, and it is not in order
for a Member to address them to the official reporters. Deschler-Brown
Ch 31 Sec. 14.14. The Chair may delay his response to a parliamentary
inquiry pending examination of relevant House precedents. 8 Cannon
Sec. 2174. Responses to parliamentary inquiries are not subject to
appeal. 5 Hinds Sec. 6955; 8 Cannon Sec. 3457. The Chair may take a
parliamentary inquiry under advisement, especially when the inquiry
does not relate to the pending proceedings of the House. Manual
Sec. 628; 8 Cannon Sec. 2174.
The Chair may clarify a prior response to a parliamentary inquiry.
Manual Sec. 628.
Sec. 14 . Subjects of Inquiry
Proper Subjects of Inquiry
The Chair responds to parliamentary inquiries relating in a
practical sense to the pending proceedings, such as inquiries relating
to the application of the rules and precedents to a pending or
otherwise pertinent situation. The Chair has entertained parliamentary
inquiries concerning the following:
The anticipated order of business. Deschler-Brown Ch 31
Sec. 14.7.
The status of the Clerk's progress in reading a document.
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 14.12.
The Speaker's authority as presiding officer. Deschler-Brown
Ch 29 Sec. 2.1.
Improper Subjects of Inquiry
The Chair may decline to entertain an inquiry on a subject not
relevant to the pending question. Under this principle, the Chair has
declined to respond to hypothetical questions, to questions not yet
presented, and to requests to place pending proceedings in a
historical context. Manual Sec. 628. The Chair has declined, for
example, to anticipate whether language in a measure would trigger
certain executive actions or to allocate debate time on a conference
report not yet filed. Similarly, the Chair has declined to
[[Page 673]]
anticipate the precedential effect of a ruling or to respond to
rhetorical or political characterizations of pending business.
A proper parliamentary inquiry relates to an interpretation of a
House rule, not to an interpretation of a statute or of the
Constitution. Manual Sec. 628. A Member may not, under the guise of a
parliamentary inquiry, offer a motion or other proposition. He must
have the floor in his own right for that purpose. 8 Cannon Sec. 2625.
In response to a parliamentary inquiry, the Chair has declined to:
Judge the propriety of words spoken in debate pending a demand
that those words be ``taken down'' as unparliamentary or judge
the veracity of remarks in debate, or the propriety of words
uttered earlier in debate.
Reexamine and explain the validity of a prior ruling.
Judge the accuracy of the content of an exhibit.
Indicate which side of the aisle has failed under the
Speaker's guidelines to clear a unanimous-consent request.
Judge the construction or meaning of an amendment, which is a
matter for the House, and not the Chair, to determine.
Characterize an amendment on which a separate vote has been
demanded.
Manual Sec. 628.
As to Orders of the House
The Chair ordinarily will not interpret a pending special order of
business prior to its adoption or render other advisory opinions. For
example, the Chair refused to respond to a parliamentary inquiry as to
whether a resolution, reported from the Committee on Rules but not yet
called up for consideration, would have the effect of violating the
rights of Members. Questions concerning informal guidelines of the
Committee on Rules for advance submission of amendments for possible
inclusion under a special rule may not be raised under the guise of a
parliamentary inquiry. Manual Sec. 628.
Sec. 15 . Timeliness of Inquiry
Generally
The Chair may decline to respond to a parliamentary inquiry that
is untimely. The Chair does not respond to a parliamentary inquiry
concerning the propriety of a proposition until the proposition is
offered. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 15.11.
Inquiries Raised During Votes
During a vote, the Chair may refuse to entertain a parliamentary
inquiry that is not related to the vote, although he may entertain an
inquiry relating to the conduct of the call. Manual Sec. 628;
Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. Sec. 15.14,
[[Page 674]]
15.15. A parliamentary inquiry may not interrupt a division. However,
such inquiries are entertained until the Chair asks those in favor of
the proposition to rise. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. Sec. 15.19, 15.20.
Similarly, the Speaker may entertain a parliamentary inquiry after the
yeas and nays are ordered, but before the vote. Deschler-Brown Ch 31
Sec. 15.18.
The Chair may decline to entertain a parliamentary inquiry as to
the cost of conducting the pending vote on the ground that the inquiry
is not relevant to the pending question. 103-1, June 10, 1993, p
12482.
Sec. 16 . As Related to Other Business
A parliamentary inquiry may interrupt matters of high privilege,
such as an impeachment proceeding. 6 Cannon Sec. 541. However, during
the reading of a bill for amendment, a Member is not entitled to a
parliamentary inquiry that would interrupt the reading of a paragraph
or section of the bill. 8 Cannon Sec. 2873.
The reading of the Journal may be interrupted by a parliamentary
inquiry. 6 Cannon Sec. 624. Furthermore, the Speaker may entertain a
parliamentary inquiry relating to the order of business before the
approval of the Journal. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 15.9.
During Debate
A Member may not be taken from the floor by a parliamentary
inquiry. The Member controlling debate must yield for that purpose.
The Chair exercises his discretion in recognition for a parliamentary
inquiry only when no other Member is occupying the floor for debate.
Manual Sec. 628; Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. Sec. 15.1, 15.2.
Time consumed by a parliamentary inquiry is charged to the Member
controlling time who yields for that purpose. When the Chair
recognizes a Member for a parliamentary inquiry when no other Member
has the floor, the Member controlling debate is not charged for the
time so consumed. Deschler-Brown Ch 31 Sec. 15.4.