[Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Volume 32, Number 34 (Monday, August 26, 1996)]
[Pages 1483-1484]
[Online from the Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
<R04>
Letter to Congressional Leaders Transmitting a Report on the Partnership
For Peace Initiative
August 21, 1996
Dear Mr. __________:
In accordance with section 514(a) of Public Law 103-236 (22 U.S.C.
1928(a)), I am submitting to you this report on implementation of the
Partnership for Peace (PFP) initiative.
The ongoing adaptation of Europe's security structures to post-Cold
War realities remains one of our highest foreign policy priorities. A
central element of this adaptation is the extension of NATO's zone of
stability and security to Europe's emerging democracies. Over the past
two and a half years, the Partnership for Peace has made a significant
contribution to this goal by forging new cooperative ties between the
Alliance and its Partners. This U.S. initiative has united NATO Allies
with countries recently emerged from communist and traditionally neutral
states in a partnership based on respect for democratic principles,
peaceful resolution of disputes, and practical cooperation.
For all Partners, PFP will be an enduring instrument for forging
stronger ties with
[[Page 1484]]
NATO. For those Partners interested in joining NATO, PFP is the best
path to membership. As you will see from the enclosed report, NATO and
its Partners have made impressive progress in broadening and deepening
the Partnership over the past year. We are working with our Allies and
Partners to build on the Partnership's early momentum in the shared
conviction that cooperation and common action are the best means to
achieving lasting security throughout the Euro-Atlantic area.
Sincerely,
William J. Clinton
Note: Identical letters were sent to Jesse Helms, chairman, and
Claiborne Pell, ranking member, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations;
and Benjamin A. Gilman, chairman, and Lee H. Hamilton, ranking member,
House Committee on International Relations.