F e d e r a l    D e p o s i t o r y    L i b r a r y    P r o g r a m

 

[ Click Here For Information About the FDLP Desktop ] Home
About the FDLP
Depository Management
Electronic Collection
Locator Tools & Services
Processing Tools
Publications
Q & A
askLPS  ·  Calendar  ·  Contacts  ·  Library Directory  ·  Site Index  ·  Site Search
.......................................................
 

Proceedings of the 5th Annual Federal Depository Library Conference April 15 - 18, 1996 Washington National Airport Hilton Arlington, VA

Library Programs Service
U.S. Government Printing Office
Washington, DC 20401
.

U.S. Government Printing Office Michael F. DiMario, Public Printer

Superintendent of Documents
Wayne P. Kelley

Library Programs Service
James D. Young, Director

Depository Services Staff
Sheila M. McGarr, Chief

Marian W. MacGilvray
Editor

. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.


.

Table of Contents

Agenda. . . . v

GPO Update: J.D. Young. . . . 3

Overview of Compact Disc Standards, Including CD-ROM, CD Write Once, and Photo CD: William Reilly. . . . 11

Preservation and Archival Issues for Electronic Records: the Center for Electronic Records of the National Archives and Records Administration: Fynnette Eaton, Theodore J. Hull. . . . 18

Access to and Services for Federal Information in the Networked Environment: Joan F. Cheverie. . . . 22

Knowing Your Local Community: Using Federal Information to Learn About Community Change: Vicky York, Jerry Johnson . . . . 25

Using Older Documents for Historical Research: Serial Set & Congressional Record: Judith M. Feller. . . . 26

The Internet as a Shared Community/Library Experience: Carolyn Gaswick. . . . 34

Internet as a Shared Community/Library Experience in Michigan: Carolyn Price. . . . 37

FinanceNet and U.S. Business Advisor: Glynis Long . . . . 38

The Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC): Holly Wilson . . . . 40

ERIC in the Electronic Age: Tamara M. Westover. . . . 48

Current Issues Facing the Federal Statistical System: Edward J. Spar. . . . 50

Some Current Issues in Federal Statistical Policy: Stephen J. Dienstfrey. . . . 53

Working Toward a Virtual Library: Laurie E. Stackpole . . . . 56

Access to Federal Information on the WWW: The Public Library Perspective: Anna A. Sylvan. . . . 61

The World Wide Web at a Small State University: Larry Schankman . . . . 67

What Wicked Web Will We Weave?: Maggie Parhamovich Farrell. . . . 70

Dissemination of Energy Information: An Overview of the Energy Information Administration Electronic Dissemination Program: Mark Rodekohr. . . . 76

U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information in the Electronic Information Age: David L. Govoni . . . . 78

National Center for Health Statistics: Electronic Information Dissemination: June Gable. . . . 81

Government Documents Check-in in an Electronic Environment: Jerry Frobom. . . . 83

Automated Check-In of Documents in Regional Depositories with USDOCS, a PC-Based System: University of Idaho Library Experience: Lily Wai . . . . 92

USDOCS in Action: A Demonstration of Margaret Mooneyþs Electronic Check-In Program: Elizabeth Baur. . . . 95

Working Groups, Committees, Associations, Task Forces, Coalitions: What Have We Been Doing for the Past Few Years?: Julia F. Wallace. . . . 97

How Ready Are We to Become Electronic Depository Libraries?: Lily Wai . . . . 107

Facilities Planning for the Electronic Age: Robert A. Hinton. . . . 112

Purdue University's WWW GPO Access Gateway: Origins and Evolution: Bert Chapman. . . . 118

GPO Access Gateway at Case Western Reserve University: George Barnum. . . . 121

GPO Access, WAIS, via the WWW at Oklahoma State University through Oklahoma Gateway: Suzanne L. Holcombe . . . . 124

SWAIS Gateway: How to Set One Up, User Support Issues, and Why Join Up?: Ellen M. Dodsworth. . . . 126

Too Many Sticks, Not Enough Carrots: Implementing an SWAIS Gateway: Debora Cheney . . . . 128

Bureau of Economic Analysis Gross State Product: George Downey. . . . 132

Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Projections: Donna Desrochers. . . . 134

NOAA Electronic Products and Services: Dottie Anderson, Anna Fiolek, Doria Grimes. . . . 136

What is Driving Federal Information Policy?: Patrice McDermott. . . . 141

Contributors. . . . 145


.

Agenda

Spring 1996 Depository Library Council

Meeting &

Federal Depository Conference:

April 15 - 18, 1996

Washington National Airport Hilton

2399 Jefferson Davis Highway

Arlington, Virginia


Sunday, April 14

4:00-5:00 New Documents Librarians
Orientation to Council and Conference

6:00 Informal pre-dinner get-together to network by food preference

Monday, April 15

8:00 Registration and Coffee

8:30 Welcome & Introductions - Plenary session

8:45 Welcome & Government Information Initiatives Update

  • Michael F. DiMario, Public Printer

    9:15 GPO Update

  • Wayne Kelley, Superintendent of Documents
  • J.D. Young, Director, Library Programs Service (LPS)
  • LPS Staff
    Judith Russell, Director, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services (EIDS)

    10:30 GPO Update (continued)

    12:00 Working Lunch
    In order to foster networking, librarians are requested to lunch with other librarians from similar types of institutions.

    2:00-5:00 Depository Library Council
    Committee Reports and Recommendations for Council Action

    2:00-5:00 New Documents Librarians
    Informal session to answer questions from mundane to complex about depository issues. For new documents librarians or those who feel "new" to any aspect of depository librarianship. Veteran documents librarians from a variety of backgrounds plus GPO staff will be available.

    2:00-3:00 Overview of Compact Disc Standards, Including CD-ROM, CD Write Once, and Photo CD

  • William Reilly, Technical Writer/Editor, Graphic Systems Development Division, GPO

    2:00-3:00 GPO Access Demonstration: Federal Register

  • Terri Barnes, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO
  • Vicki Ries, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO

    2:00-3:00 LPS Tour

    2:00-3:00 Patent Public Search Room Tour

    3:00-4:00 Preservation and Archival Issues for Electronic Records

  • Theodore Hull, Archives Specialist, Center for Electronic Records, NARA
  • Fynnette Eaton, Chief, Technical Services Branch, Center for Electronic Records, NARA

    3:00-4:00 GPO Access Demonstration: Congressional Products

  • Terri Barnes, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO
  • Vicki Ries, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO

    3:30-4:30 Trademark Public Search Room Tour

    4:00-5:00 Access to and Services for Federal Information in the Networked Environment

  • Joan Cheverie, Visiting Program Officer, Coalition for Networked Information

    4:00-5:00 GPO Access Demonstration: Other Web Applications, GILS, Monthly Catalog, BBS, etc.

  • Terri Barnes, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information
    Dissemination Services, GPO
  • Vicki Ries, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO

    5:30 Dinner with Council (Informal groups meet in hotel lobby)

    .Tuesday, April 16

    8:00 Coffee with Council & GPO

    8:30 Depository Library Council/Conference - Plenary Session
    Taking the Next Step: Preparing Libraries for a More Electronic Federal Depository Library Program
    Focused Discussion Sessions:
    Issue 1 - Bibliographic Access in an Electronic Environment

    10:30 Depository Library Council/Conference
    Issue 2 - Long-Term Retention and Access to Electronic Information

    12:00 Working Lunch
    In order to foster networking, librarians are requested to lunch with other librarians from similar sized institutions

    2:00-3:00 Scientific and Technical Information Center Tour

    2:00-5:00 Depository Library Council Working Session

    2:00-3:00 Knowing Your Local Community: Using Federal Information to Learn About Community Change

  • Vicky York, Associate Professor, Montana State University-Bozeman Libraries
  • Jerry Johnson, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Dept. of Political Science, Montana State University-Bozeman

    2:00-3:00 GPO Access Demonstration: Federal Register

  • Terri Barnes, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information
    Dissemination Services, GPO
  • Vicki Ries, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO

    2:00-3:00 Using Older U.S. Documents for Historical Research: Serial Set and Congressional Record

  • Judith M. Feller, Documents Librarian, East Stroudsburg University

    2:00-3:00 LPS Information Exchange (Drop-in)

    3:00-4:00 Internet as a Shared Community/Library Experience in Michigan

  • Carolyn Gaswick, Documents Librarian, Albion College
  • Carolyn Price, Documents Librarian, Flint Public Library

    3:00-4:00 GPO Access Demonstration: Congressional Products

  • Terri Barnes, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO
  • Vicki Ries, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO

    3:00-4:00 FinanceNet and U.S. Business Advisor

  • Glynis Long, Americans Communicating Electronically

    3:00-4:00 Defense Information at Your Fingertips

  • Holly Wilson, Librarian, Defense Technical Information Center

    4:00-5:00 Web Sites for Patrons Seeking Government Information

  • Doreen L. Hansen, Depository Office Manager, University of Minnesota, Duluth
  • James Vileta, Government Documents Librarian, University of Minnesota, Duluth

    4:00-5:00 GPO Access Demonstration: Other Web Applications, GILS, Monthly Catalog, BBS, etc.

  • Terri Barnes, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO
  • Vicki Ries, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO

    4:00-5:00 ERIC in the Electronic Age

  • Lawrence M. Rudner, Ph.D., Executive Director, ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation
  • Tamara Westover, Outreach Coordinator

    4:00-5:00 Federal Statistical Policy

  • Edward J. Spar, Executive Director, Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics
  • Stephen Dienstfrey, Vice-President, Association of Public Data Users
  • Thomas Brown, Past President, International Association for Social Science Information Service and Technology

    7:30-9:00 ALA/GODORT Program: Talking to Congress: What Works

    Wednesday, April 17

    8:00 Coffee with Council & GPO

    8:30-12:00 Depository Library Council Working Session
    Draft Recommendations and Action Items

    8:30-10:00 Handout Exchange (Drop-in)

  • Facilitator: Larry Romans, Head, Government Information Department, Vanderbilt University
  • GPO Promotion and Advertising Branch

    8:30-9:30 Working Toward a Virtual Library

  • Laurie E. Stackpole, Chief Librarian, Naval Research Library

    8:30-9:30 Pathway Services Demonstration

  • Raeann Dossett, Internet Specialist, GPO

    8:30-10:00 REIS CD-ROM Training Session

    8:30-10:00 Regional Program
    Welcome and Introductions
    The World Wide Web: Four Perspectives on Its Use

  • Kenneth Mortensen, Director of Operations, Villanova Center for Information Law and Policy
  • Anna Sylvan, GIS/Documents Librarian, St. Charles City-County Library District
  • Larry Schankman, Documents Coordinator, Mansfield University
  • Maggie Parhamovich Farrell, Internet Specialist, GPO

    10:00-12:00 Federal Publishers Committee
    An opportunity to meet representatives from Federal agency publishers to find out about their latest techniques/practices in electronic information dissemination

  • Moderator: Nancy Nicoletti, Chief, Publication Services, Energy
    Information Administration, U.S. Dept. of Energy
  • Mark Rodekohr, Director, Energy Markets & Contingency Information Division, U.S. Dept. of Energy
  • Mary McMichael, Supervisory Economist, Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • David Govoni, NMD Internet Services Coordinator, U.S. Geological Survey
  • June Gable, Chief, Information Services Section, National Center for Health Statistics

    10:00-11:00 LPS Tour

    10:00-11:00 Patent Public Search Room Tour

    10:30-11:30 Pathway Services Demonstration

  • Raeann Dossett, Internet Specialist, GPO

    10:30-12:00 Regional Program
    Automated Check-in of Documents at Regional Depositories:
    OPAC and Innovative Interfaces

  • Jerry Frobom, Federal Documents Librarian, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
    PC-based USDOCS and Bernan
  • Lily Wai, Head, Government Documents, University of Idaho
    USDOCS and Marcive
  • Elizabeth Baur, Documents Librarian, University of Memphis

    10:30-12:00 REIS CD-ROM Training Session

    10:30-12:00 LPS Information Exchange (Drop-in)

  • LPS staff and contractors

    12:00 Working Lunch
    In order to foster networking, librarians are requested to lunch with other librarians from the same geographic region

    1:30-3:00 REIS CD-ROM Training Session
    2:00-5:00 Depository Library Council Working Session

    2:00-3:00 Regional Program
    Working Groups, Committees, Associations, Task Forces, Coalitions: What Have We Been Doing for the Past Few Years?

  • Julia Wallace, Head, Government Publications Library, University of Minnesota
    How Ready Are We To Become Electronic Depository Libraries?
  • Lily Wai, Head, Government Documents, University of Idaho Library

    2:00-3:00 GPO Access Demonstration: Federal Register

  • Terri Barnes, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO
  • Vicki Ries, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO

    2:00-3:00 Facilities Planning for the Electronic Age

  • Robert Hinton, Documents Librarian, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis

    2:00-4:00 WAIS, Lynx, WWW, and S-WAIS Gateways: Origins and Evolution

  • Bert Chapman, Government Publications Coordinator, Purdue University Libraries
  • George Barnum, Head of Government Documents, Case Western Reserve University
  • Walter Newsome, Documents Coordinator, University of Virginia
  • Suzanne Holcombe, Assistant Documents Librarian, Oklahoma State University
  • Ellen Dodsworth, Documents Librarian, Georgetown University
  • Debora Cheney, Head, Documents/Maps Section, The University Libraries, Pennsylvania State University

    2:00-3:00 LPS Tour

    2:00-3:00 Scientific and Technical Information Center Tour

    3:00-5:00 Regional Program
    Open Discussion: Transition to an Electronic Federal Depository Library Program

  • Facilitator: Cassandra Hartnett, Documents Coordinator, Detroit Public Library

    3:00-4:00 GPO Access Demonstration: Congressional Products

  • Terri Barnes, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO
  • Vicki Ries, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO

    3:00-4:00 Regional Input-Output Modeling System Multipliers and Regional Economic Projections and Gross State Product Data

  • Eric Repice, Regional Economist, Regional Economic Analysis Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Department of Commerce
  • George Downey, Chief, GSP & Projections Branch, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Department of Commerce
  • Donna Desrochers, Regional Economist, GSP & Projections Branch, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Department of Commerce

    3:30-4:30 Trademark Public Search Room Tour

    4:00-5:00 NOAA Electronic Products and Services

  • Anna Fiolek, Documents Coordinator, NOAA Central Library
  • Doria Grimes, Chief, Contract Operations, NOAA Central Library
  • Dottie Anderson, Reference Librarian, NOAA Central Library

    4:00-5:00 GPO Access Demonstration: Other Web Applications, GILS, Monthly Catalog, BBS, etc.

  • Terri Barnes, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO
  • Vicki Ries, Management Analyst, Office of Electronic Information Dissemination Services, GPO

    4:00-5:00 GPO Pathway Services Focus Group

  • Raeann Dossett, Internet Specialist, GPO
  • Maggie Parhamovich Farrell, Internet Specialist, GPO

    Thursday, April 18

    8:00 Coffee with Council & GPO

    8:30 Depository Library Council/Conference - Plenary Session Report of Draft Recommendations and Action Items (including audience response and comments)

    10:00 Conclusion of Council Meeting

    10:45 What's Driving Federal Information Policy

  • Patrice McDermott, Information Policy Analyst, OMB Watch

    11:15 Roles for Libraries and Librarians Within the NII

  • Fred W. Weingarten, Senior Policy Fellow, American Library Association, Washington Office

    12:00 Conference Adjourns.

    .


    1996 Federal Depository Conference

    ..

    GPO Update

    J.D. Young
    U.S. Government Printing Office
    Washington, DC

    Good morning everyone. It's my pleasure also to welcome you to the Spring 1996 meeting of the Depository Library Council and the biggest and, I'm sure, the best yet Federal Depository Conference. We regret the crowding, but the turnout for this meeting is totally unprecedented. Attendance is up about 50% from last year, and although we thought this year would be unique, we never expected that kind of jump.

    First, I want to thank the many people, both in and outside of GPO, especially our own LPS staff, who contributed to the study of our Depository Program. I want to commend Judy Russell for the amazing job she did in pulling the whole thing together and Wendy Frederick and Ric Davis for the hours of work they put in finishing the writing and editing of the study report. I also want to thank the participants in Study Task 6, which was an "evaluation of current laws governing the FDLP and recommendation of any legislative changes necessary for a successful transition to a more electronic program." I think that many of the issues identified in the larger Study working group came together in the "legislative change task" and I recommend you look carefully at that section of the draft Study Report.

    It seems that all we have been doing for the past several months in the Library Programs Service has had to do with the future; working on the study, preparing budget materials, and drafting plans. In this regard, I want to commend Gil Baldwin, our Library Division Chief, who has led these efforts. I also want to commend all of our LPS managers who have kept the traditional services going while at the same time being heavily involved in the study and planning activities.

    Speaking of traditional services, I do have one piece of news that I think you will like in one respect, but probably is not good news for our overall program. Based on our output of titles distributed in the first half of this year, it appears that, for the first time in many years, the number of titles distributed in microfiche will be less than those distributed in paper. Where the ratio has been 60% fiche to 40% paper, it may be the reverse of that this year. As best as we can tell, this is the result of two things: 1) a downturn in the kinds of titles that would have been subject to conversion to fiche coming through GPO for printing, and, 2) we are receiving fewer single copies from agencies that we would have converted and distributed in fiche. The number of paper titles is about the same as the past two years, so that type of material is holding in better. Certainly, some of the fiche type material is now only being published via agency Internet sites or what we are now referring to as "Government electronic information services."

    Transition Tasks in LPS

    And that brings me back to the electronic environment. Judy has discussed the results of the study. Now what I would like to do this morning is share with you some of our thoughts on how GPO and the Library Programs Service will approach the movement toward a more electronic program. We have had our Appropriations hearing in the House where the feeling still seems to be for a rapid transition. However, the thoughtful expressions of concern from the many stakeholders in Government information led to the five-year strategic plan which was included in the study. Our Senate appropriations hearing is scheduled for mid-May.

    At Library Programs Service, we will implement our plans through a project type approach, and we are now in the process of assigning responsibilities for specific projects and identifying tasks. We are approaching this on a project basis because it is coming on top of our regular work which must continue as well. Conceptually, we will break the implementation into four major projects.

    1) The first project is the obvious one of acquiring electronic information products for the FDLP. This will include tangible products such as CD-ROMS, acquiring information for online dissemination via GPO Access, and the identification of information products falling within the scope of our program at other agency sites. As an extension of the traditional acquisitions work we do, Robin Haun-Mohamed and the Depository Administration Branch will be responsible for this project.

    2) The second project will address cataloging and locator services. As you know, most agencies, excluding the sci/tech ones, have not cataloged their own publications. This has been a centralized service performed by the Superintendent of Documents. I have concerns that, in the electronic environment, agencies will not do any more than before to provide for real, persistent, bibliographic control. So, I believe that bibliographic control, at what has been the individual publication level, is a centralized service that the Superintendent of Documents should continue to perform, or at least fully coordinate. This major project, which will encompass a range of activities from traditional cataloging to the emerging suite of Pathway services, will be the responsibility of Tad Downing and the Cataloging Branch, with the help of our Electronic Transition Staff.

    3) Transition-related activities which strengthen the depository library system through training, continuing education, and the revised inspection program, comprise the third project, which will be the responsibility of Sheila McGarr and the Depository Services Staff.

    4) The fourth project is to establish a system for providing permanent retention and access to FDLP information. This is a role that our program has played through our Regional library system, and one that the Superintendent of Documents, in my opinion, must continue. Ric Davis and the Electronic Transition Staff, in addition to assisting with all of the transition projects and launching several on their own, have responsibility for this key project and for coordinating this issue with other stakeholders.

    That's the project breakdown; now I'd like to focus on each of these four areas.

    I. ELECTRONIC CONTENT FOR THE FDLP

    Online Electronic Products in the FDLP

    First, for the acquisitions project, the current definition of "government publication" in Section 1902 of Title 44, U.S.C. needs to be broadened to include, without question, electronic information, whether published as a tangible product or made accessible via an electronic online service. During the Legislative Task 6 discussions for the study, we arrived at some new definitions. Let me run through them quickly. They are included in the study report as Attachment F and in the Strategic Plan which is Exhibit 1.

    "Government information" means Government publications, or other Government information products, regardless of form or format, created or compiled by employees of a Government agency, or at Government expense, or as required by law.

    A "Government information product" means a discrete set of Government information, either conveyed in a tangible physical format including electronic media, or made publicly accessible via a Government electronic information service.

    A "Government electronic information service" means the system or method by which an agency or its authorized agent provides public access to Government information products via a telecommunications network. The telecommunications network today is, of course, the Internet.

    As you know, a common usage to describe things on the Internet has been "information products and services." We tried to deal with this in the December budget transition plan, when we defined products as tangible, and services as intangible or online information. But, for our application, this still did not work well. According to the dictionary, service is a "system or method of providing people with the use of something," therefore it is not the "something" itself. So, in our application, the "something," as we see it, is the information product or the content, and it is provided on an electronic information service. One other note, OMB has used "information dissemination products and services." We must be very aware of use of the word "dissemination" in this manner, however, because it can be construed to mean only those information products that are actually created for public dissemination. We all know how limiting that would be, since most Government information products are originated for internal use and then have external value as well.

    Handling Online Electronic Products

    Even as we speak, electronic government information products are being incorporated into our program. I want to bring to your attention that the draft Study report, Appendix E to the Strategic Plan, the very last pages in the report, has a set of diagrams showing how we intend to handle the various agency publishing alternatives.

    Some of the products coming into the program exist only as online files accessible from a Government electronic information service, and others may be related to print editions of the same information content. We are developing a consolidated approach to presenting and identifying online electronic products. We think this approach makes sense in the electronic environment, but it does not necessarily carry forward all of the familiar (and resource intensive) elements of the paper-based model.

    The "Custody" Issue

    The changeable nature of many online electronic products in terms of permanence or location has led us to concentrate initially on those electronic titles over which the Superintendent of Documents (SOD) has custody or control. This distinction has very real resource implications for LPS. The distributed information management environment of the Internet does not lend itself to a centralized holdings model. Instead, the originating agency, or the agency which has custody of the data, is best positioned to assume responsibility for it.

    Presentation on GPO Access

    Preparing for the 21st Century: An Appraisal of U.S. Intelligence was the first document to be made available through the program exclusively in an online format. It first appeared on the GPO home page with a NEW highlight. We have now developed a specific Web page entitled "Government Information Products Available on the Internet From GPO" with the products arranged by Government agency and alphabetically by title under each agency. This page can now be reached from the Pathway services page on GPO Access, but we will be relocating it for quicker accessibility.

    Classification

    A Superintendent of Documents classification number was established for Preparing for the 21st Century in order to allow the title to be processed for the various Monthly Catalog outputs, including presentation on the GPO Web site. However, this classification number may not be the model used for future electronic products.

    Librarians from the depository community and LPS have joined together to review the application of the SuDocs classification system to online products. At the ALA meeting in San Antonio, concern was expressed over the announcement that LPS would not be applying the SuDocs classification system to online resources. There was also a misunderstanding of our intent concerning the application of the SuDocs system to physical products. That effort will be continued.

    In response to this concern, LPS formed an ad hoc committee to consider these issues. The group is reviewing one proposal to keep some of the elements of the existing SuDocs class structure and adding a system generated number after it. It is assumed that one of the reasons for wanting to keep the SuDocs number is its usefulness in identifying information about the agency responsible for the product. The proposal being reviewed would allow this type of information to be retained, but would also allow staff to process the products more quickly.

    As you know, the location requirements of intangible or online electronic data are not met by the SuDocs system. For electronic information products stored in a digital data repository, permanency and uniqueness can be ensured by applying the "persistent name," or URI, Uniform Resource Identifier; or "handle." When a standard for "persistent names" emerges, we will utilize or adapt the approach to identify the electronic information products under our custody. In the near term, the modified classification number I just spoke of may be assigned to electronic titles for control purposes until the "persistent name" approach matures. If you have ideas on this process, please contact Robin Haun-Mohamed, or of course, share them with the Council.

    Notifying Depository Libraries

    We do not intend to issue an "Electronic Products" Shipping List for resources found only online on the GPO Access Services. Although we have included information about Preparing for the 21st Century in the latest Administrative Notes Technical Supplement in the E-Report column, this method is only an interim solution. We will use the "New and Hot" section of the new page on our Web site to notify you of online electronic products available from GPO Access.

    Selection

    Online electronic titles will not be assigned an item number. When an online electronic product is available from GPO Access, all depository libraries have access to it and the limitations of the item selection do not apply in this context.

    Document Conversion Efforts

    Our Electronic Transition Staff (ETS) has been exploring the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of various approaches to expanding the range of electronic content in the FDLP. ETS and members of GPO's Production Services staff conducted an in-depth investigation of the feasibility and costs of scanning and conversion requirements for FDLP titles. Our goal in scanning was to create searchable, full text documents rather than just scanned images. We conducted conversion tests on a number of documents using commercially available off-the-shelf software.

    Our tests produced mixed results. While large-scale document conversion proved to be possible, it was also found to be in many cases, very expensive. Current document conversion and scanning technology offers the possibility of creating either non-searchable image or full-text searchable electronic files. However, documents we tested that were "text-intensive" had high character recognition error rates that would have necessitated a time-consuming and expensive proofing process prior to dissemination. So far, it appears that large-scale scanning of "text- intensive" publications is not a very viable option.

    Our Next Steps

    While recognizing the limitations of the current technology, our test results suggested that there is still a limited use for this process. A selective number of paper documents that are approximately 30 pages or less, and are "graphics-intensive," may be converted to image-only files and made available via GPO Access. These types of publications are excellent candidates for image-only document conversion.

    We have also experienced success with some products that have been made available via GPO Access as ASCII and PDF files. However, these have not required conversion, but were products received by GPO from Federal agencies as original, electronic source files that are not only authoritative, but do not require significant proofing or have expensive "clean-up" costs associated with their data.

    Source Data Files

    As nearly all Government information products exist in electronic form at some point in their life cycle, the most cost-effective method of incorporating additional electronic information products into the FDLP is to obtain that source data from the originating agency. We will be pursuing different approaches to this end, including reaching out to publishing agencies to provide us with their files, and obtaining electronic data files from printing contractors.

    .II. CATALOGING AND LOCATOR SERVICES

    Our second project is to develop cataloging and locator services, which will include the Pathway services.

    We intend to provide full AACR2, MARC format cataloging for Government information products which come under our custody, whether in a physical format or an electronic file in a SOD facility. Our Locator services, including Pathway services and GILS records, will index and point users to the content of other Government information products on the Internet.

    Links Project

    Council recommended that LPS link MOCAT records that represent titles published in differing physical forms and/or in remotely accessible locations. This is a good recommendation, which we will pursue. The Cataloging Branch has done a considerable amount of homework investigating the potential use of linking entry fields. We consulted with CONSER and cataloging policy experts at the Library of Congress, in order to understand what is truly involved with such a venture, and to define the universe of potential linkages and the related complications.

    We are considering a variety of options concerning how best to approach identifying electronic products on the Internet within the constraints of staffing and other resources. Within MOCAT, we will include the URL for those electronic titles which are available on GPO Access. Initially, the URL will not be hot linked but we intend to make them live links.

    Another alternative we are investigating is Pathway Bibliographic Records. The concept is to identify selected full text electronic titles at agency Internet sites with abbreviated records consisting of six or seven data elements. The records will be hot linked so that users can proceed from the Pathway record to the electronic text at the agency site.

    Pathway Services

    Other Pathway tasks are moving forward through the efforts of Maggie Parhamovich Farrell, Raeann Dossett, and Joe Paskoski. They have taken steps to facilitate searching on the Internet through the Pathway Indexer, which will locate specific files by keywords. A prototype Pathway Indexer is operational on the GPO Web site. The Pathway Indexer functions like many other Internet indexers such as Yahoo!, except the Pathway Indexer is limited to only Federal Government Internet sites. We are currently using Harvest software and hope to upgrade the Pathway Indexer to more sophisticated search software in the near future.

    The second application is our Pathway browse capability. Instead of looking for specific information with the Pathway Indexer, users can browse through subjects and titles for their information. We are using the subject topics from the Subject Bibliographies for this purpose and analyzing Internet sites by subjects. Government Internet sites are then listed under the appropriate topic. Users can browse through the topic list and select a topic which interests them. The browse application is also used for the new "Government Information Products" list which I mentioned earlier. And finally, the Pathway GILS records created by LPS are integrated with the GPO GILS database. The Pathway GILS records are customized records in the GILS format which describe agencies at the highest level and point to agency Web sites and GILS holdings as well as to depository libraries.

    For more information regarding Pathway services, please attend one of the demonstrations on Wednesday at 8:30 and 10:30. Also, Raeann, Maggie, and Joe will be conducting a focus group on Wednesday at 4:00 to solicit feedback regarding Pathway services.

    .Status of GPO Cataloging Products

    Concerning current cataloging products, more than 38,000 Monthly Catalog records are now available at our Web site. These records begin with January 1994, and the most recent are those created two work days ago. Using the "locate" function, users are able to identify depository libraries that have selected titles represented by item numbers in these records.

    The abbreviated paper edition of the Monthly Catalog is being distributed. To date, the January, February, and March 1996 issues have been published. The size and complexity of the paper catalog has been greatly reduced, which will allow us to save a significant portion of the more than $500,000 that had been spent per year on the full paper edition. In May we expect to distribute the 1995 Cumulative Index to the Monthly Catalog, which will be the last of the old format paper products. We regret the confusion created by our inadvertently sending copies of the paper edition to libraries that had not selected it. If you did not select the paper edition but received a copy, treat it as you would an unselected title. If you selected the CD-ROM edition, be assured that we will honor your selection.

    We had hoped to publish the CD-ROM edition of the Monthly Catalog at the same time as the abbreviated paper edition. There has been a delay, but we will soon be sending beta test copies of the CD-ROM prototype to Council members and other librarians. The search software, Dataware Technologies' Referencebook, provides effective searching, but we need to receive comments related to the "user-friendliness" and overall design of this product.

    There is no question that the cataloging and locating project will be a complex one. We look forward to the Council session tomorrow at 8:30 on "Bibliographic Access in an Electronic Environment" and to advice from the Council.

    III. STRENGTHENING THE DEPOSITORY SYSTEM

    Now, to the subject of library service expectations. As we have said, in addition to tangible and online electronic information from GPO, electronic information from another Government agency's site will be considered FDLP information when we direct and link users to it via our Locator services. Every depository is expected to be able to offer public access to electronic information made available through the FDLP.

    The "Guidelines for the Federal Depository Library Program," which were developed with the help of Council, were distributed to all depository libraries in February 1996. Paragraph 7-8 of the "Guidelines" states that:

    Appropriate hardware and software must be provided for public users accessing electronic information available through the Federal Depository Library Program (e.g., CD-ROMS, on- line databases, etc.). This hardware and software should include computer work stations capable of providing Internet access that requires GILS-aware software, CD-ROM readers, and printers.

    This requirement to provide public access to electronic FDLP information will be effective October 1, 1996. During a depository library inspection, we will use a functional approach to determine compliance with this requirement. The inspector will focus on the depository library's ability to provide public access to electronic FDLP information. The method selected by the depository library to meet this public access requirement is a local determination.

    We have also prepared draft "Recommended Minimum Specifications for Public Access Work Stations in Federal Depository Libraries," which describes a single work station capable of meeting this requirement. When finalized, the January 1995 "Recommended Minimum Technical Guidelines" will be superseded. Copies of this draft are available and it will be discussed at the Council working session tomorrow afternoon.

    These recommended specifications are intended to assist depository librarians who are planning purchases of new personal computers for public use. Computer equipment in depository libraries must be sufficient to allow timely and equitable public access to the Government information products accessible via Internet, to CD-ROMS, and should allow printing or downloading information selected by the user. Additional or different capabilities may be desirable for work stations used by library staff. Some libraries may elect to add applications software, such as spreadsheet, word processing, or data base software, to their public access work stations, but this is a local resource management decision.

    Depository libraries are encouraged to adapt this menu of specifications to fit local situations. Although these specifications describe a robust multi-purpose single work station, many institutions are providing electronic access in networked environments. We cannot anticipate or address every possible depository library computer scenario. Rather, these specifications are intended to assist depository staff in making informed purchases.

    Given the large variation in the size of Federal depository libraries and the numbers of users served, we can not recommend a universal standard for the number of public access work stations in any given library. This must be a local decision based on several factors.

    Also, these specifications are not intended to describe the best possible work station. Instead, they are the minimum, or baseline, specifications which should be considered when purchasing new stand-alone public access work stations. We encourage the purchase of equipment which exceeds these minimum specifications. The speed at which computer capabilities are evolving suggests that a higher initial outlay will result in an extended useful life for the equipment.

    Inspection Program

    Concerning the inspection program, we intend to change the focus so that the resources devoted to periodic inspections can be reallocated to support and services to depository libraries. Now that the depository library self-study has been adopted as an evaluation tool, we intend that the basis for inspections will be that specified in 44 U.S.C. .1909, which states that "the Superintendent of Documents shall make firsthand investigation of conditions [in depository libraries] for which need is indicated ..."

    We will concentrate on site compliance inspections of those libraries which submit unsatisfactory self-studies, have major changes in staffing or facilities, have prior records of non- compliance, or if complaints are received from the public concerning depository library services. Our Depository Services Staff will also be available to visit, consult with, and assist a depository library upon request.

    Later this year, we will begin to implement the use of the depository self-study on a wider scale. We will concentrate our initial efforts on those libraries that have not been inspected recently.

    IV. PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC FDLP INFORMATION

    And finally, to the burning issue of permanent access and retention. Historically, the FDLP, through the mechanism of the regional depository libraries, has guaranteed permanent preservation of, and access to, tangible Government information products. Regional libraries provide the only capability for permanent access to relatively complete collections of tangible government products at locations throughout the country.

    I believe that working to ensure permanent access and persistent bibliographic control are the two most important roles for the Superintendent of Documents and our program in the electronic environment. These are both traditional roles that have been played by the Superintendent of Documents and, I feel, must be continued as a part of Government information policy.

    With respect to purely electronic Government information, there is no parallel mechanism to ensure that this information is "archived" for permanent public access. During the study, numerous participants raised issues concerned with preserving electronic Government information.

    Our Legislative Task group proposed the following language that "The Superintendent of Documents will coordinate with issuing agencies, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and with Regional and other depository libraries to establish a system so that Government information products available via Government electronic information services will be maintained permanently for depository library and general public access. This system will utilize as one component the electronic storage facility established by the Superintendent of Documents under the GPO Access Act."

    We will undertake a coordination role for this overall effort. As a starting point, we will begin with ensuring permanent access to information that is under our custody. Dealing with the agencies regarding information products on their Internet sites will be another matter, however. It is critical that we seek to guarantee that information will still be available in formats that can be permanently accessed and preserved in the future. This will be accomplished by not only GPO, but by other Federal agencies, including NARA, as information is "refreshed" to new mediums for continuing availability and access.

    I believe that legislation will be needed to address this major question and others, so, once again, please review the ideas put forward in Task 6 of the study report and we welcome your feedback.


    [ Back to the Table of Contents ]

    .

    Overview of Compact Disc Standards, Including CD-ROM, CD Write Once, and Photo CD

    William Reilly
    U.S. Government Printing Office
    Washington, DC

    "CD-ROM Standards" was to be the title of this discussion and would have made this hour an easy one. At the end of a detailed explanation regarding just CD-ROM the reasons why certain discs will not play in certain CD players would still remain unclear.

    We must take on the whole family of CDs and see how they relate to each other and then we will have discovered why they are not interchangeable.

    Of course, no one in this room has had trouble playing a disc. After all, if they fit in the player, they should work. Right?

    When Philips and Sony began in 1982 with the digital audio musical disc and players they detailed the standards and were given proprietary licenses in a red covered book.

    The Red Book standard covers the CD-DA audio disc which is the first of several standards and the one the rest are patterned after.

    The Yellow Book followed in 1983 when the same people announced a modification that would allow for the storage of information along with or instead of music. CD-ROM read only memory had emerged.

    The Orange Book and Green Book have since emerged as standards that go beyond the Yellow Book standards.

    Slide 1 A quick review of the many different types of CDs will help us get started. Then, we will relate these different types of discs to the various standards.

    The CD-DA or audio disc is the first and it is the one that plays the music. This is digital audio for the consumer. No more LP albums needed.

    The CD-ROM is the data storage disc with read only memory and is the one disc related in every way to the ISO standards. Compliance with these standards insures that the disc will play on players made to meet the standard.

    CD-ROM HFS is made to play on MAC platforms and is not standardized.

    CD-ROM/XA is based on the CD-ROM standards but has gone beyond the original technology and is not an ISO standard.

    CD-I is Philips Motion Video.

    CD-I Ready is an audio disc with features for CD-I player

    CD-WO is a write-once disc used for writing multiple sessions until a disc is full.

    Photo CD is compressed images using the XA technology to permit Kodak to write photos to a CD disc

    CDTV is a disc that only plays on a Commodore system.

    (The only ISO standard CD is a CD-ROM, other standards are not ISO)

    Slide 2 There are 3 types of track layouts for CD disc, the Red Book and the Yellow Book are both ISO standard 10149.

    The Orange Book standard is not yet an ISO standard but is very much in use because of Photo CD and multimedia CDs using this track layout.

    The Red Book has a Lead-in and TOC followed by music tracks and finishing with a Lead-out.

    The Yellow Book can be a Mode 1 for recording data in 9660 format, or Mode 2 for recording sound, images, and video. The Lead-in and TOC followed by the Lead-out are present here only one time.

    Orange Book includes the Write Once, Multisession and can write Red, Yellow, and Green Book data. Notice the Lead-in followed by data and a Lead-out can be repeated many times.

    Slide 3 The Red Book Audio Track Layout is the basis for the technology and remains a good place to learn about CDs.

    Data written to a track is in increments called sectors. Each sector is a small container of bytes of data.

    Sectors are read by the player at the rate of 75 per second. The disc can hold 74 minutes of sectors or 333,000 sectors.

    To read the disc in proper timing, the speed of the spinning disc must change from 500 rpms at the center to 200 rpms at the outer edge.

    Mixed Mode tracks are found to contain a Lead-in and TOC followed by several data types or just one structure of data written to the 9660 standard and a Lead-out. Mixed Mode complies with the Yellow Book standard.

    Slide 4 Slide 5 The Orange Book Track Layout is used for the more exciting products in the CD family. All recordables, multisession, Photo-CD, music, and mixed mode data can be written to this kind of disc.

    After looking at the three basic tracks found on a CD it is time to look at how the data is broken down to small containers called sectors of data.

    Once again, we begin with the first CD: the Red Book audio structure. Each disc can contain up to 99 tracks. Each track will contain data in increments called sectors of 2352 bytes of data. A CD disc can contain up to 330,000 sectors of data.

    Slide 6 CD audio sectors contain only music and do not contain Error Correction and Detection schemes.

    Slide 7 The sectors used for the Red Book are modified to contain data and EDC and ECC. Each change in sector construction reflects a different usage of the 2352 bytes available in each sector.

    The Yellow Book standard also requires 12 bytes of sync and 4 bytes for header information.

    Sync is a location address code and header is a sector name, both are required to randomly seek the sectors of data. The computer needs this data to determine which sector it is reading.

    Each 2048 bytes of data written to a sector is verified when read out to assure accuracy of the data in Mode 1. Since Mode 2 contains audio, or images EDC and ECC is not used.

    Slide 8 Just as the Yellow Book sector started with the original Red Book design, the Orange Book sectors are based on the Yellow Book Mode 2 structure.

    CD-ROM/XA Mode 2 contains compressed audio and computer data interleaved on the same track. This permits the playback of both types of data almost simultaneously which is the defining characteristic of this type of disc.

    The Orange Book standard describes a CD-ROM Mode 2, XA (extended architecture) format. The CD-ROM/XA may be written in either Form 1, or Form 2 sector structure.

    Orange book sectors begin with Sync and Header bytes but have added Subheader data to the structure. This byte of information is used to specify a file number that identifies all sectors belonging to the same file and defines which type of sector it is, Form 1 or Form 2.

    Form 1 sectors are primarily used to store computer data due to the EDC and ECC allocations at the end of the sector.

    Form 2 sectors usually contain compressed audio, data, video, or picture data. There is no EDC and ECC coding in Form 2 which allows more room for data storage.

    The Orange Book standard requires the use of the Yellow Book Mode 2 sector design as a basis for its unique sector design. Data written to these sectors can be Form 1 or Form 2 as stated above.

    The Orange Book also describes the write-once recordable CD types.

    Part I refers to CD-MO (magneto optical) technology which means part of the disc can be pre- mastered and part left open for recording electronically. Reading is accomplished by changes in polarization which affect the laser beam. Also, Part I can be 100 percent rewriteable. Regular CD players cannot read this disc.

    Slide 9 Part II refers to a CD-WO (write once) disc. After the last recording is made, a TOC is written to the disc and a regular CD player can read the first entry recorded. If more than one recording is written to the disc, or compressed audio or video is present, a special board or a purely XA player must be used on this Hybrid disc.

    Photo-CD uses this standard for its product. Specifically, Photo-CD is a Mode 2 Form 1, Orange Book Part II Hybrid disc. Photo-CD uses the CD-Bridge disc format to allow CD-I and CD- ROM/XA players to read this data structure.

    Slide 10 CD-DA is an audio music disc, the original CD disc written to the Red Book Standard; it plays on a CD audio drive.

    CD-ROM is a read only memory disc which follows the ISO 10149 Yellow Book Standard for physical standards, and the ISO 9660 logical standards for file structure. The standards guarantee readability if the standard drive is used for playing. Can be read on multiple platforms.

    CD-ROM HFS is a Macintosh product and requires Mac hardware and is not standardized.

    CDTV is a proprietary format used by Commodore requiring their hardware for playability.

    CD-ROM/XA goes beyond the ISO 10149, ISO 9660 standards and is used to record interleaved data for concurrent playback. Also used by Kodak Photo-CD and other write once products.

    CD-I refers to Philips interactive motion video and can be viewed using Philips players and a TV screen.

    CD-MO is a magneto optical technology that allows for a rewriteable area on a CD-ROM/XA. If the disc has a premastered area this area can be read on any player.

    CD-WO a disc containing one or many recording sessions. Standard CD players can only read the first session but with additional software can be made to read all sessions. Regular WO discs can be read on standard player; Hybrid WO must use an XA player or have the software mentioned above.

    Slide 11 Slide 12 .Slide 13 Slide 14

    CD-ROM is the only completely standard product.

    ISO 10149 describes the size of the disc, refers to the Yellow Book for track structure and sector structure and guarantees readability.

    ISO 9660 is the logical file structure standard and further guarantees readability by assuring read/write compatibility between data on disc and software designed to read the standard. .Directories are assembled beginning with a Primary Volume Descriptor found in logical sector 16. This file points to a path table file which contains directions to all subdirectories contained in the next 7 levels of directories.

    Slide 15 Slide 16 .Slide 17

    .

    The information for this lecture was taken from the above mentioned organizations and Multimedia, Making It Work by Tay Vaughn; CD-ROM, Facilitating Electronic Publishing by Linda W. Helgerson. The SIGCAT Foundation in Reston, VA also contributed to this study.


    [ Back to the Table of Contents ]

    .

    Preservation and Archival Issues for Electronic Records: the Center for Electronic Records of the National Archives and Records Administration

    Fynnette Eaton
    Theodore J. Hull National Archives and Records Administration
    College Park, MD

    Access to government information is essential in a democratic nation. It depends, to a large degree, on good record-keeping by government agencies, on the preservation of important records, and on public access to those records. The information in records has considerable value in documenting the vast scope and great diversity of Federal Government activities and functions. Federal records often are the best available sources of information for various kinds of research, including research in history, sociology, economics, and the natural sciences.

    The Center for Electronic Records is the organization within the National Archives that appraises, accessions, preserves, and provides access to Federal records in a format designed for computer processing. The Center maintains electronic records with continuing value created by the Congress, the courts, the Executive Office of the President, numerous Presidential commissions, and over 100 bureaus, departments, and other components of executive branch agencies and their contractors. Originally, these records are created or received by agencies of the Federal Government. They may concern virtually any area or subject in which the government is involved. They may be from any type of computer application such as data processing, word processing, computer modeling, or geographic information systems.

    Archival Services and Electronic Records Preservation

    Identifying permanently valuable records for retention by the National Archives involves cooperation between the Archives and the various agencies of the Federal Government. Through the process of appraisal, the Center identifies and selects the electronic records it judges to have enduring value.

    When appraising electronic records, archivists evaluate the contents of the records for their evidential, legal, and informational value and for their long-term research potential. Some of the factors in the decision include whether the information is in its original form, whether the records can be linked with other information, how the records relate to past and present research trends, which Federal agency created them and why, how the information was used, and what impact the records had on Federal programs and policy. Generally, only a small percentage of all electronic records are evaluated as having enduring value.

    When the National Archives receives a transfer of electronic records, two copies of the original records are made onto 3480-class tape cartridge, the current preservation media. The Technical Services Branch of the Center for Electronic Records administers the preservation program for electronic records. Regulations require Federal agencies to submit their records to the National Archives in a hardware and software independent format, on either 9-track magnetic tape or 3480-class tape cartridge, encoded in ASCII or EBCDIC and blocked no higher than 30,000 bytes. Recently, the National Archives has announced the acceptance of data transferred on CD-ROM media, accepting only those records conforming to a select set of 'standard' formats. In addition, any transfer of electronic records to the National Archives must be accompanied by adequate and proper documentation about the contents of the records. Electronic records transferred to the National Archives on CD-ROM will be copied to archival media, namely 3480-class tape cartridge, and the original CD-ROM will be used for reference, when appropriate.

    The preservation program of the Center for Electronic Records provides valuable services to both Federal agencies and the general public. The Technical Services Branch has implemented a pro- active program to ensure the long-term accessibility of the records, as the preservation media for electronic records is fragile and deteriorates relatively rapidly compared to other forms of archival records. The branch annually conducts an analysis of a statistical sample of the tapes and cartridges to ensure that the environmental conditions are not adversely affecting the media. The environmental conditions at the National Archives for the storage of electronic records conform to current standards. The preservation program also involves rewinding those records preserved on open reel magnetic tape at a constant tension at normal tape speed every time they are placed on a tape drive. Finally, copies of permanent records are made every ten years to new media, or more frequently when necessary, to prevent the physical loss of data or the technological obsolescence of the medium.

    Recently, the Technical Services Branch developed and implemented a new system for the preservation of electronic records. Prior to moving to the new National Archives facility in College Park, Maryland, the Center conducted the majority of its preservation activity on mainframe computing facilities at another government agency. The system now operational at the College Park facility is the Archival Preservation System (APS). The APS allows for the preservation of electronic records received on a variety of media, such as CD-ROM, onto the current archival media. Alternatively, the APS will eventually allow for researchers to request copies of files not only on the two available media (9-track magnetic tape and 3480-class tape cartridge), but on a variety of output media. This development should enhance access to electronic records for those researchers who do not have access to mainframe computing resources.

    The Center's Holdings

    In general, the electronic records transferred to the National Archives are themselves evidence of evolution in the application of computer technology in support of program administration, planning, record-keeping, and research within agencies of the Federal Government. A few of the data files were originally created as early as World War II and reflect punch-card technology in use since the 1880s; an even smaller number contain information from the 19th century that has been converted to an electronic format. However, most of the electronic records in the Centerþs holdings have been created since the 1960s. Numbering well over 20,000 unique files of electronic records, measuring more than 325 gigabytes in volume, the scope of the Centerþs holdings is quite diverse--as diverse as the activities and interests of the Federal Government itself.

    Among the types of holdings or subject areas represented in the Centerþs holdings are the following:

    a. Agricultural Data (including the Department of Agriculture's livestock and crop production estimates, the periodic Census of Agriculture, 1949-79, and household food consumption surveys).

    b. Attitudinal Data (including surveys about equal opportunity, crime, violence; surveys sponsored by the U.S. Information Agency (USIA), and the "American Soldier" surveys of soldiers during World War II).

    c. Demographic Data (including data from the Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce).

    d. Economic and Financial Statistics (including income, labor, securities, tax, trade, and transportation statistics).

    e. Education Data (including data illustrating the variety of education programs of the U.S. Federal Government).

    f. Environmental Data (including records created on behalf of the Presidential Commissions on the Accident at Three Mile Island and the Coal Industry, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Radiation Exposure Information Reporting System, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Survey's Nautical Chart Data Base).

    g. Health and Social Services Data (including data incorporating both biomedical and sociological information and efforts to measure the effectiveness of a variety of social programs).

    h. International Data (including import-export statistics and USIA-sponsored surveys).

    i. Military Data (including "American Soldier" surveys, Prisoners of War records for World War II and Korean Conflict, casualty records for Korea and Vietnam Conflicts, and a large collection of datasets resulting from the use of computers for military operations, management, and research dating from the 1960s, especially during combat in Southeast Asia).

    j. Scientific and Technological Data (including registers and surveys of scientific and technical personnel, and data from the National Ocean Survey).

    Electronic Records Reference Services

    The reference service staff of the Center provides information about the Center's holdings and assists researchers in finding those records that are most useful for their projects. A number of finding aids describe the holdings, including the Title List: A Preliminary and Partial Listing of the Data Files in the National Archives and Records Administration.

    Persons seeking information about electronic records should write to the Reference Staff, Center for Electronic Records, The National Archives at College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001, or telephone the reference staff at 301-713-6645. The Center also uses electronic mail to communicate with researchers; the Internet E-mail address is cer@nara.gov. The Title List and other descriptive materials about the Centerþs holdings are also available online on the National Archives' gopher/World Wide Web site known as CLIO.

    To access the NARA gopher via the Internet, point your gopher client at gopher.nara.gov, port 70 (the default):

    gopher://gopher.nara.gov:70

    Researchers can access the Web site with an HTTP client. The URL to use is:

    http://www.nara.gov

    These materials are also available from an FTP site: Use ftp.cu.nih.gov, directory nara_electronic. A list of the available files on the FTP site is in the file read.me.

    Copies of records in the Centerþs custody are available for purchase by researchers in a variety of media, with varying encoding. Photocopies of documentation for electronic records can be obtained either with the data or separately. In some instances, the documentation is available in electronic format or microform in addition to paper. Researchers can also visit the Center's research room to review and self-copy documentation. Currently, the Center for Electronic Records provides researchers with copies of electronic records on either 9-track magnetic tape (1600 or 6250 b.p.i.), or on 3480-class tape cartridge (37,871 b.p.i.). For current information on available media and the cost-recovery fees for reproductions, please request a copy of the Centerþs descriptive material on services and fees.

    A natural outgrowth of the National Archives' improved computer network capabilities and access to information in electronic form in the future may be to provide direct remote access to selected records in the custody of the Center for Electronic Records. The Center is currently planning to build on the capabilities of its electronic records validation system (AERIC), to improve access to information about the records, or their metadata, and eventually to some of the records themselves.

    Some records are natural candidates for remote access and retrieval of specific records. In addition to casualty files from the Korean and Vietnam conflicts, other data files for which such capabilities are appropriate are data files such as the quarterly Federal Assistance Awards Data System and annual Defense Contract Action Data System. They have, respectively, records on Federal disbursements of monies to specific geographic areas by program and contracts of over $25,000 let by the Department of Defense. .However, other large statistical databases, especially survey or sample data, do not necessarily lend themselves to remote access because the records need to be used as full files for analytical purposes or researchers need to identify and extract specific subsets of full files. The Center is exploring using FTP to provide on-line accessible copies of some files, depending on the size of file and other factors. To address the remote access needs of researchers to large, complex data files is a current topic of discussion for future enhancements to the reference services offered by the Center for Electronic Records.

    This paper was adapted from the text of National Archives General Information Leaflet 37, "Information About Electronic Records in the National Archives for Prospective Researchers" (rev. 1995) and Theodore J. Hull, "Reference Services and Electronic Records: The Impact of Changing Methods of Communication and Access," Reference Services Review, (Summer 1995; vol. 23, No. 2), pp. 73-78..


    [ Back to the Table of Contents ]

    Access to and Services for Federal
    Information in the Networked Environment

    Joan F. Cheverie
    Coalition for Networked Information
    Washington, DC

    The white paper, "Access to and Services for Federal Information in the Networked Environment," is an initiative of the Coalition for Networked Information. It is being developed over a year long period while I am the Visiting Program Officer at the Coalition on a half-time basis. I am also the Head of the Government Documents and Microforms Department at Georgetown University.

    The Coalition for Networked Information was founded in March 1990 to help realize the promise of high performance networks and computers for the advancement of scholarship and the enrichment of intellectual productivity. The Coalition is a partnership of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL), CAUSE, and Educom.

    The Coalition accomplishes its objectives by focusing on key enablers and obstacles, providing assistance to, promoting communication among, and fostering partnerships with Coalition members; synthesizing progress being made on key initiatives, capturing the experience of Coalition members and others in a coherent, actionable manner; and disseminating lessons learned by those initiatives, amplifying the experience of Coalition members by informing the efforts of others.

    The Coalition pursues its mission with the assistance of a task force of over two hundred institutions and organizations that provides focus and resources which are crucial to the ability of the Coalition to articulate and explore shared visions of how information management must change in the 1990s to meet the social and economic opportunities and challenges of the 21st century. Members of the Coalition Task Force include higher education institutions, publishers, network service providers, computer hardware, software, and systems companies, library networks and organizations, public and State libraries.

    The basic premise of this white paper is that with the increasing use of information technologies there has been a significant change in how Federal agencies produce and disseminate information. This results in new and changing user needs and expectations which, in turn, necessitate the need for institutions that facilitate the flow of this information to rethink their responsibilities and capacities in this changing environment.

    This initiative will result in a white paper that will guide higher education and others, such as State and public libraries, in the development of strategies for providing access to and services by their constituencies in the networked environment. This is not a policy paper. The paper will focus primarily on issues and models for collections, preservation, providing access to and services for Federal information. It will address these issues at the enterprise-wide or institutional level. It will also summarize policy and technical directions to provide a framework for understanding the issues involved.

    .The primary audience for the paper will be: Institutional Leaders Service Providers/Program Managers

    Other audiences will include: Associations Federal Information Producers Commercial Service Providers Policy Makers Users of Federal Information

    Evidence for the paper will be gained by:

    Issuing a Call for Participation Conducting a literature search Interviewing key players Convening focus groups

    Our vision is: Wide access Convenient access Timely access Long term access Ability to customize and otherwise repackage information

    The outline for the paper is as follows:

    OVERVIEW

    This section will provide an overview of Federal information, as well as define concepts, issues, and parameters, thereby providing a framework for discussion and analysis.

    The key points that will be addressed include:

    The role of Federal information in a democratic society New patterns of dissemination for Federal information Changes in Federal information policy

    .FOCUS OF THIS PAPER

    In order to inform institutions of the challenges and opportunities for reaching the vision outlined above, this paper will examine the following areas:


    Networked Information Discovery and Retrieval (NIDR)
    Service Questions
    Collections
    Preservation
    Management Questions

    Networked Information Discovery and Retrieval

    Issues:

    Mechanisms for locating information are rudimentary and less adequate than systems for other media.

    Organization and indexing is chaotic making access haphazard at this time. We will need to develop different strategies to identify, locate, and deliver Federal information.

    The necessity of paying for access (which had otherwise been free) and the limiting of passwords, in some access mechanisms, has the potential of hindering access.

    Solutions:

    Structured document searching capabilities; sophisticated, well-developed search mechanisms to both find and use Federal information.

    How is metadata represented in the networked environment?; how to manage machine to machine communication?

    GILS will be the standard syntax for describing government information. It should make things coherent so others can come along and add to it.

    .Service Questions

    Topics to be addressed will include:

    Information service

    Instruction

    Role of data/research centers in the manipulation of Federal data services needed by researchers and citizens

    Levels and communities of users

    Institutional view of services

    Collections

    Issues:

    Who will house this information?

    How does the institution decide what to make available and at what level?

    Preservation

    Issues:

    Access for scholarly (and other types) communication in the long term.

    Can institutions house this information?

    How long will institutions house the information and the implications?

    Management Questions

    Issues:

    Organizational infrastructure

    Impact on staff and institution

    Staffing and training

    Access to the Net and issues such as broad-band width, etc.

    .SCENARIOS

    As an aid to thinking about the future with so many unknowns and variables, this section will formulate a wide variety of alternative scenarios. These models will address all aspects of the questions already defined including issues of funding and budget.

    CONCLUSION

    Summary and recommendations for:

    Institutional policies and practices

    Consortial or cooperative arrangements

    Applicability to the flow of state, local, and global information

    Further study


    [ Back to the Table of Contents ]

    .

    Knowing Your Local Community:
    Using Federal Information to Learn About Community Change


    Vicky York
    Jerry Johnson
    Montana State University-Bozeman
    Bozeman, MT

    This presentation reported on a Montana State University project funded by the Council on Library Resources to encourage libraries as leadership organizations within their communities. It included the showing of the video, Knowing Your Local Community: Using Federal Information to Learn About Community Change. The video highlights the role of the Federal Depository Library system and the use of government data for profiling change in rural communities. Three case studies are presented showing how Census and Bureau of Economic Analysis data can be used to understand demographic and economic change in a community or region. The video also describes an interactive video workshop that was held at four depository library sites in Montana. Depository librarians at the sites served as facilitators for the workshop. As part of the workshop, Jerry Johnson presented a case study of one community, describing the methodology involved, and Vicky York covered the portion on finding the data in both print and electronic forms.

    The overall goals of the project were to:

    1) demonstrate the value of distance education technologies (interactive video) to information delivery;

    2) profile depository libraries and promote cooperation among the depository libraries in the state; and,

    3) encourage the use of electronic formats for accessing government information.

    The project stemmed from the earlier publication of Measuring Change in Rural Communities: A Workbook for Determining Demographic, Economic and Fiscal Trends. Participants in the workshop received a copy of the workbook and were encouraged to contact the depository library facilitator nearest them for help in getting started with the data gathering.

    As the video shows, the benefits of the project were clear: collaboration among libraries; increased awareness of the role of depository libraries; and better access to information on which to make decisions.

    Information about ordering copies of either the workbook or the video is available from:

    Vicky York
    Assoc. Professor
    MSU Libraries
    Montana State University-Bozeman
    P.O. Box 173320
    Bozeman, MT 59717-3320


    Phone: 406-994-6658
    e-mail:
    alivy@gemini.oscs.monta na.edu


    [ Back to the Table of Contents ]

    .

    Using Older Documents for Historical Research: Serial Set & Congressional Record

    Judith M. Feller
    East Stroudsburg University
    East Stroudsburg, PA


    The idea for this presentation was prompted by reference questions posted to GOVDOC-L over the last few years. With so much of our energy focused on electronic sources and access, itþs sometimes easy to forget that almost 200 years' worth of U.S. government publications are still in non-electronic format, and some can only be identified through printed indexes, or in some cases, through the knowledge of the librarian.

    In 1986, Steven D. Zink wrote an excellent article discussing the reasons why historians often fail to use United States government documents in their research.

    1 Among the possible reasons, he cites: inadequate e0ducation in their use; inadequate indexing of the documents themselves; reluctance to ask librarians for help.

    2 From my own experience, I would speculate that many librarians, particularly those who donþt work with government documents, have precisely the same problems as the historians. I wasn't born a documents librarian. Much of my knowledge was acquired on the job, thanks to the mentoring of more experienced colleagues. With those thoughts in mind, my goals this afternoon are:

    1) to provide an overview of the Serial Set and Congressional Record as sources for historical research;

    2) to suggest some strategies for getting access to the material.

    Serial Set

    What is the Serial Set? In simplest terms, it is the cumulation of House and Senate reports and documents, in bound volumes, if your library selects the hard copy version, or divided by those numbered 4x6 plastic guide cards if you select microfiche. For a thorough description of the Serial Set, including an explanation of serial numbering, I recommend the User Handbook for the Congressional Information Serviceþs Serial Set Index.3

    The Serial Set which depository libraries currently receive is composed of large numbers of House and Senate reports. We also receive a much smaller number of publications with the designation þDocument,þ including treaty documents. The þDocuments,þ though few in number, are extremely useful--so much so that they are often issued to all depository libraries in hard copy. Two of my favorites are The Constitution of the United States: Analysis and Interpretation and the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress, 1774-1989.4

    The Constitution... Analysis and Interpretation is an article by article discussion of the Constitution, in the context of landmark Supreme Court cases. Its index of cases has been a life- saver for us when someone has a case name but no U.S. Reports citation. High school students and graduate students alike use it as a starting point for background on Constitutional issues.

    The Biographical Directory is a convenient, one-volume source of information on all senators and representatives, 11,000 of them, from the Continental Congress (1774) to 1989. Formerly titled Biographical Directory of the American Congress, it was first issued in 1949 as a House Document, and is a revision of several earlier biographical directories. The brief biographies take up most of the book, but thereþs some handy prefatory material, including a list of presidents and their cabinets, Senators and Representatives, by state, for each session of Congress, and delegates to the Continental Congress. The House and Senate documents currently issued are a drop in the bucket compared to what was issued before 1900, the halcyon days of the Serial Set. A gradual decline in the scope of the Serial Set resulted from more stringent regulation of government printing, under the Printing Act of 1895.5 The Serial Set and the changes it has undergone are described in a recent article by Suzanne DeLong.6

    In my quick tour of the Serial Set, I'm going to focus on þdocumentsþ issued before 1900 when the Set was quite different from what we see today. During the early twentieth century, it still contained some types of publications rarely found there now, but its real heyday was before 1900. It contains a wealth of information often overlooked by historians, as well as librarians.

    American State Papers (ASP)

    The American State Papers are that part of the Serial Set encompassing the earliest administrations. It was originally to cover only the 1st through 13th Congresses, but the project was extended to include some publications through the 25th Congress--the Military Affairs class, for example. Systematic numbering of Congressional publications did not begin until the 15th Congress, and the compilation of the ASP was not completed until 1838. Thatþs why the serial numbers of the volumes are always preceded by a 0 to distinguish them from the serial volumes published beginning in 1817.7

    Here's an example of publications included. Parts of the Lewis and Clark expedition include Historical sketch of tribes, Geographical description of the Red River and adjacent country, and Meteorological observations. Other interesting titles: Troops, including militia, furnished by the several states during Revolutionary War and Enlisting minors in army, improving condition of rank and file, by establishing schools, retaining whisky ration, and exempting those serving four years from militia duty. Just to show that times haven't changed, there's this one: Complaints by cadets against military academy at West Point.

    The American State Papers are not complete. In fact, many documents of the War Department to 1800 are missing. In November, 1800, a fire at the office of Secretary of War Samuel Dexter destroyed all of the department's records. I mention this because East Stroudsburg University is home to a project to restore those records from scattered copies. The goal of the project, entitled Papers of the War Department, 1784-1800, is to produce a searchable CD-ROM with the full text of newly-discovered documents. Dr. Theodore J. Crackel, retired Army officer and history professor, is the project director and editor. He and his assistant editor are thoroughly scouring libraries and archives throughout the United States for pertinent materials, but would like to hear about any documents they might have missed. These would probably be letters to or from one of the secretaries of war--Henry Knox, Timothy Pickering, James McHenry, or Samuel Dexter--and would most likely be in a library's special collections department. I've included the name of the project director and his address in the bibliography.8

    Serial Set, 1817-1900

    As you've seen from the quick exploration of the American State Papers, some fascinating documents are found there. My motto is, If you're looking for an old U.S. document, think Serial Set. A good way to get acquainted is to simply browse the Finding Lists found in the CIS Serial Set Index. If your library doesn't have that, you might use one of the older indexes such as Poore or Ames.9 You'll see titles as diverse as Contributions to North American Ethnology, Congressional Directory, Report of the American Historical Association, Geological Survey Bulletins, Foreign Relations of the U.S., and Consular Reports published as House or Senate documents. A request recently posted to GOVDOC-L was for the loan of Annual Report of Commerce and Navigation of U.S. from the 1880's, and a quick check showed that they were all included in the Serial Set as House Executive Documents. Monographs on some rather unexpected subjects are included: British Military and Naval Operations in Egypt, 1882; War between Chile, Peru, and Bolivia, 1879-1881; Reports on Labor in America, Asia, Africa, Australasia, and Polynesia; Notes on Reindeer.

    Before leaving the Serial Set, I want to discuss two gems: the Rebellion Records and the Census. The Rebellion Records document a tragic episode in our history. My library has many volumes in hard copy, but in the 1970's, some were sent away for rebinding and perished when the bindery was flooded (ironically, they were the Naval Records). It was our acquisitions librarian who told me that the entire series was included in the Serial Set, which we have in Readex Microprint.

    The Rebellion Records are a vast compendium which includes a general index and atlas. Each series has multiple volumes and parts, too much to include on the transparency. If youþre interested in greater detail, CIS Serial Set Index lists the separate volumes and parts in the subject index under the heading, Rebellion Records.

    Last but not least, the Serial Set includes the 7th through 11th Census. These provide statistics on population, transportation, agriculture, manufacturing, and even vital statistics--an enormous resource for charting the growth of our country. Final volumes of the Census for 1880 and 1890 cover some intriguing subjects not found there today.10 Here are some examples:

    1880 (10th, published 1883-85) v. 8 - The newspaper and periodical press; population, industries, and resources of Alaska; seal islands of Alaska; shipbuilding industry in U.S. v. 9 - Report on the forests of North America (exclusive of Mexico) v. 12 - Report on mortality...:Pt. 2, Statistics of deaths, by locality, cause, etc. v.21 - Report on the defective, dependent, and delinquent classes; statistics of the insane, idiotic, blind, deaf and dumb, homeless children, paupers, and criminals.

    1890 (11th, published 1891-96) Churches in U.S. 1890; Crime, pauperism, and benevolence; Insane, feeble-minded, deaf and dumb, and blind; Real-estate mortgages in the U.S.

    These publications are worth looking at just to see how demographic concepts have changed over the century. For example, in the Population section of the 10th Census (1880), there are tables showing population distribution by drainage basins, mean temperature, and maximum temperature.

    Of course these early Census compilations don't contain the þPopulation Schedules, the personal names sought by people doing their family genealogies. Many people are referred to our library because we have The Census and are disappointed to hear that we only have numbers, not names.

    Subject Indexes to the Serial Set

    If the Harvard Guide to American History is still considered the historian's bible, it's easy to understand why they are so reluctant to tackle government documents, especially in the Serial Set.11 The current edition of the Guide was published in 1974. It notes that the Serial Set and hearings are available in microform and cites the CIS Index (which only began in 1970). Unfortunately, the CIS Serial Set Index was not published until 1977, so historians-in-the-making must look beyond the Harvard Guide to learn about that great index.

    The Serial Set Index is easy to use. Each part covers a range of Congresses, with a 2-volume subject index and one-volume of Finding Lists. The subjects and keyword terms are taken from the publication titles. Once you find your subject, you will also find all of the information you need to locate the publication in the Serial Set.

    The Finding Lists include:

    1. An Index of Names of Individuals and Organizations which have been the subject of private laws and other Congressional action. These names are not included in the subject volumes;

    2. Numerical List of Reports and Documents;

    3. Schedule of Serial Volumes.

    If you get genealogy questions in your library, the Index of Names may be useful if someone knows that an ancestor was the subject of a claim or petition. I was trying to find a genealogy connection for this presentation, and one practically fell into my lap. My stepmother has been working for years on her family genealogy. She's a very experienced researcher, but on rare occasions, I've found sources of use to her. This time, she called to asked me about some citations she didn't understand. As she read Congress numbers, references to Senate bills, and House Journal pages, I really got excited and asked her to send me copies of what she was reading. What I received was from the Digested Summary and Alphabetical List of private claims presented to the House of Representatives...from the 1st to the 31st Congress, exhibiting the action of Congress on each claim with references to the journals, reports, bills, etc. This publication, reprinted in 1970, was originally a House document. The Preface to the reprinted edition has some helpful information, including the fact that records relating to the private claims cited are in the National Archives, in the records of the House of Representatives. I needed to find out more about the records of the House. Documents to the rescue again: everything I wanted to know was in a depository publication weþd put in the Reference Department: Guide to the Records of the United States House of Representatives at the National Archives, 1789-1989.12 Chapter one, An introduction to research in the Records of Congress is must reading for anyone doing research in United States history. It has an excellent discussion of how to use the Congressional Record and House and Senate journals to search for petitions or private claims. There's a parallel volume for the Senate, and both of these publications were issued as House and Senate documents.13

    The Schedule of Serial Volumes is of particular value if you have a citation from a footnote or bibliography and need to find the Serial Set volume number. Of course the citation must include at least the Congress number.

    What did we do before the Serial Set Index? What do you do if your library doesn't have it? As you can see, the choice is rather limited. Poore's Descriptive Catalogue covers the longest period. It has a subject index (which is defective according to the Harvard Guide).14 What that means, in my experience, is blind references which are not on the page you're sent to. Publications are arranged chronologically, so although there may be reference to many pages under a subject, no subheadings are given. If you don't know the publication year, you have to scan each page, a tedious process. That would not be so bad, but the double columns of fine print are particularly hard on old eyes like mine. There are citations to the State Papers with the Class (e.g., Public Lands), volume number, pages, Congress, and session. Congressional documents and reports are cited with numbers, Congress, and session. With that information, you go to the Schedule of Serial Volumes which will give you the Serial Set volume number.

    Ames's Comprehensive Index is a magnificent work, and it's a shame we don't have anything comparable for the earlier part of the century. Its coverage is said to be complete for the Serial Set during that period, although it does not have complete coverage of departmental documents. Arrangement is by subject, with authors in a column on the left, and House or Senate document or report numbers to the right. An especially useful feature of Ames is that many of the periodicals cited are also analyzed. For example, Grape culture and wine making in Russia is an article in the Consular Reports, and many other unusual articles can be found. Unfortunately, the CIS Serial Set Index does not index to that level.

    The Catalog of the Public Documents...1893-1940 and Monthly Catalog, 1895- are of limited use, simply because they begin so late in the century.

    A User Education Problem

    In recent years, I find that increasing numbers of undergraduate and graduate students are unable to distinguish between book citations and periodical citations. As you might imagine, something that begins, United States. Congress. Senate and ends with incomprehensible numbers and letters presents real problems. Several years ago, it dawned on me that the jargon of legislation is a foreign language in need of basic translation.15 A simple guide explaining what the common citation means and the location of the material represented helps demystify þgovernment documentsþ and leads students to materials such as the Serial Set. I suspect that some students omit mention of documents they've actually read because they don't know how to cite them in a bibliography. Any time I take students or other researchers to Congressional publications, I give them the call number for the Complete Guide to Citing Government Information Resources.16

    Congressional Record and Its Predecessors

    Congressional Record

    Like the Serial Set, the Congressional Record and its predecessors must be mined to yield their historical treasure. What is the Congressional Record? It's certainly not the verbatim record of the proceedings in Congress some people think it is. Since its earliest years, it has been so heavily edited that newspaper accounts of what was said in Congress are sometimes more accurate than whatþs printed in the Record.17 Stories abound about remarks edited or censored. For a discussion of that problem, I suggest Schmeckebier and Eastin.18

    As you can see, the Record is only the latest in a succession of serials purporting to report the proceeding in Congress. The Record actually began as a government publication, unlike the earlier titles, which were printed by commercial printers and simply sold to the government. For the century under discussion, we donþt have to worry about daily issues and bi-weekly indexes. From its inception, annual indexes of the Record are similar to those we receive today (eventually!).

    As you know if you use the Record index, the most detailed subject information is under the names of the legislators. This lack of specific subject headings can be frustrating, but for the subjects that are covered, the Congressional Record can be a useful source of information about contemporary issues and problems. The fact that it has an annual index is a definite advantage. The index to the New York Times for the same period is quarterly or semi-annual through the 19th century, which doubles or quadruples your searching.

    Two especially useful sections of the Congressional Record index are the Histories of House Bills and Resolutions and Histories of Senate Bills and Resolutions.þ These list all bills introduced and give the histories in concise form, including the date on which the bill was introduced and the committee to which it was referred. If youþre doing a legislative history, this is certainly the place to begin.

    Congressional Globe

    In its early years, the Congressional Globe was (like its predecessors, the Register of Debates and Annals of Congress) more of an abstract than a verbatim report of the proceedings. Each volume has an Appendix which includes materials such as messages of the President and reports of department heads. Beginning in 1853, the text of public laws was included.19

    There are two indexes: one for the Senate, one for the House. It's not an ideal arrangement, but it works. I was trying to decipher some unpublished letters written from Washington in 1873 by a lobbyist. The handwriting was eye-killing, but a phrase that looked like, Poland bill kept turning up. Checking the Globe indexes, I found Vermont Representative Luke Poland, and a lengthy speech by him on the subject of the bill.

    Register of Debates

    To quote one authority, The publication...was contemporaneous with the proceedings, but the series does not pretend to be a verbatim account.20 Our library doesnþt have them, I've never used the Register, so Iþm not going to waste time pretending that I know something about them.

    Annals of Congress

    The Annals weren't published until 1834. Their publisher, Gales and Seaton, compiled them from newspapers and other sources, the debates from October 1800 being take from the National Intelligencer. The text therefore represents abstracts of the proceedings, rather than verbatim accounts. That probably accounts for the fact that, within each session, there are separate running accounts for the Senate and House.

    Senate and House have their own indexes, and within those, separate alphabetical listings by session--by modern standards, a rather primitive and tedious arrangement. I've found browsing more fruitful than using the indexes.

    .Alternative indexes

    The House and Senate Journals, included in the Serial Set for each session of Congress, have subject and bill number indexes. Although the journals donþt give detail, they do give dates of action, enabling a researcher to find the information in the Congressional Globe or Record.

    Practical use

    I wanted this presentation to be something more than an annotated bibliography, and our local newspaper provided an excellent opportunity to illustrate practical application. The story I'm going to summarize appeared on April 2nd, and since it was from the Associated Press, I assume other newspapers may have run it, as well. The headline was, Trader's kin seek compensation.21 The trader in question was Jean Louis Legare, a Canadian fur trader who þrisked his life and nearly bankrupted himself getting Chief Sitting Bull to surrender. Legare's descendants are now trying to get reimbursement from the U.S. and Canadian governments for providing, food, supplies, horses, and wagons to Sitting Bull and his 50 to 60 followers.

    When I read the article to my husband, his reaction was, a likely story. Was it? Here was a great way to use what I'd just been writing about. It was the kind of question that could be asked in a public or academic library. I had good search keys: the names Legare and Sitting Bull and a surrender date of 1881. It took me about five minutes to find verification of the basic information with the Serial Set Index and Congressional Record. Ames also has the same information as the Serial Set Index. I'll leave the details to anyone interested in looking further-- or post them on GOVDOC-L.

    .Access - More Than Just Indexes

    If you want more detail than my sketchy presentation provided, there's no shortage of good books and articles explaining the details of the Serial Set and the Congressional Record. You'll find some of them in the bibliography I've handed out. From the standpoint of service, there are some intangible factors which are also important:

    1. Know your library's entire collection, not just what's in government documents. Although your library may only have become a depository in the last decade or two, you probably have lots of U.S. government documents. Case in point: The series U.S. Army in World War II. Although these were issued years before our library became a depository, we still have most of the series, and the commemorative reprints issued in the past year are duplicates. Don't take anything for granted--check your holdings. Our online catalogs make it (potentially) easier to identify government documents in our collections--but you have to remember to check!

    2. Know what your library has available in microform. The larger your library--the more departmentalized it is--the more likely you'll overlook these things. Our library became a depository in 1966, but we have the Serial Set, 1789-1969 in Readex Microprint and hearings on microfiche. Work closely with whoever does interlibrary loan: it's an inconvenience to your own library users and an unnecessary burden on the lending library if you request something you already have.

    3. Educate your library staff, especially everyone who works at the reference desk, where many history research questions begin. Keep copies of your bibliographic instruction handouts there, and emphasize the availability of documents in microform collections. GOVDOC-L is a fantastic medium for sharing our expertise, but I believe we need to publicize the wealth of information in government documents within our own libraries.

    4. Last, know what's available in area libraries. It seems obvious, but libraries which are not depositories may have good documents collections in hard copy or microform. Informal partnership can be helpful: in Pennsylvania's State System of Higher Education (which includes East Stroudsburg University), DOMA, the Documents and Map Librarians, compiled a directory which includes what libraries have documents collections in microform: Serial Set, hearings, American Statistics Index and Congressional Information Service microfiche. Ten of the fourteen libraries are now depositories, but even those which aren't have some valuable resources. Since our libraries are scattered across the state, we believe we are providing a service to our Congressional districts, not just to the institutions students and faculty.

    Conclusion

    In this era of hard times for libraries, we need to make the most of our collections. Older government documents are an untapped resource, not just for scholar-historians, but for students looking for interesting term paper topics, creative writers seeking background information for novels or plays, or sociologists in search of comparative data. Many of the documents on scientific or technical subjects are still useful. Make U.S. history come alive for your library users: introduce them to the Serial Set and Congressional Record.

    1. Steven D. Zink, Clio's Blindspot, Government Publications Review, 13 (Jan./Feb.1986), 67- 78.

    2. Ibid., 73-75.

    3. Congressional Information Service. User Handbook: CIS U.S. Serial Set Index, 1789-1969. (Bethesda, MD., 1980).

    4. United States. Constitution of the United States of America: analysis and interpretation... J. H. Killian, ed. (Washington, DC, 1988). 99th Congress, 1st session, S. Doc. no. 99-16 (Y 1.1/3:99-16, Ser. no. 13611); Biographical directory of the United States Congress, 1774-1989: the Continental Congress, September 5, 1774, to October 21, 1788, and the Congress of the United States, from the First through the One Hundredth Congresses, March 4, 1789, to January 3, 1989, inclusive. Bicentennial ed. (Washington, DC, 1989). S. Doc. 100-34, 100th Cong., 2nd sess. (Y.1/3:100-34)

    5. Printing Act of 1895, Statutes-at-Large, 28, Chap. 23, 601-24 (1895).

    6. Suzanne DeLong, What Is In the United States Serial Set? Journal of Government Information, 23 (1996), 123-135.

    7. Congressional Information Service, vi-x.

    8. Address inquiries to: Theodore J. Crackel, Papers of the War Department, 1784-1800, McGarry Communication Center, East Stroudsburg University, East Stroudsburg, PA 18301.

    9. B. P. Poore, ed. Descriptive Catalogue of the Government Publications of the United States, 1774-1881 (G.P.O., 1885), S. Misc. Doc. 67, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. ; J.G. Ames, ed. Comprehensive Index to the Publications of the United States Government, 1881-1893 (Washington, DC, 1905), H. Doc. 754, 58th Cong., 2nd. sess.

    10. All published as House Misc. Documents.

    11. Harvard Guide to American History. F. Freidel, ed. 2 vols. (Cambridge, MA, 1995).

    .12. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Guide to the Records of the United States House of Representatives at the National Archives, 1789-1989. Bicentennial ed. (Washington, DC, 1989). H. Doc.100-245, 100th Cong., 2nd sess.

    13. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Guide to the Records of the United States Senate at the National Archives, 1789-1989. Bicentennial ed. (Washington, DC, 1989). S. Doc. 100-42, 100th Cong.

    14. Ibid., 1:69.

    15. Judith M. Feller, Teaching Legislation as a Second Language,þ PLA Bulletin (October 1993), 9-10.

    16. Diane L. Garner and Debora Cheney. Complete Guide to Citing Government Information Resources. (Bethesda, MD, 1994)

    17. Harvard Guide, 1:72

    18. Laurence F. Schmeckebier & Roy B. Eastin, Government Publications and Their Uses. (Washington, DC, 1969), 139-142.

    19. Ibid., 138-139.

    20. Ibid., 138.

    21. Pocono Record, Apr. 2, 1996, A3.


    [ Back to the Table of Contents ]

    .

    The Internet as a Shared Community/Library Experience

    Carolyn Gaswick
    Albion College
    Albion, MI

    Albion College has received a five year grant from the Kellogg Foundation to develop an Internet network within the Albion area. The local network will be tied to other groups to form a countywide freenet. Goals of the grant include the enhancement of communications and the sharing of information resources between the college and the community. It is my responsibility as the depository librarian to determine how government information can best be made available and useful within this local network.

    Albion is a private liberal arts college with 1,600 students. We select 28 percent of the depository items. There is one other depository library in our congressional district; Jackson District Library, an 8 percent selective. However, the Albion College/Community grant is one of several grants tied to Calhoun County, and because the Jackson library is in a different county, Albion College is the only depository presence in both the local and countywide networks. As additional background, the city of Albion has a population of 11,000, and the county population is 136,000.

    We are involved in this collaborative Internet project because John Kondelik, our library director, took the time to coordinate the writing of a grant proposal. We librarians all planned and wrote, but he saw to it that the parts fit together, and that we all kept to our writing schedules.

    The overall planning for Internet access and training in our county has been too shared to be very efficient. Several groups have received grants, each providing some part of the necessary infrastructure or playing a role in Internet access for a specific group; and all these groups are involved in the governing body which plans and coordinates the structure and activities of the countywide network. Every step seems slow with so many people making each decision. When I agreed to speak today, I certainly thought we would be closer to having the Albion project in place and complete than we are. A related HUD grant brought everything to a halt for six months, and until HUD issues were resolved none of the money could be spent. The major Internet groups within the county which I need to keep in mind as I plan for depository contacts include:

    The Great Lakes FreeNet which provides connectivity throughout the county by means of e-mail and bulletin board services.

    DIAL, Distance Interaction and Learning, provides a countywide enhanced fiber optic network. It includes representatives from the countywide intermediate school district, libraries, colleges and universities, and public service agencies. DIAL will fund interactive studios at high schools and colleges, will establish distance learning to enrich secondary education, and will see that satellite downlinking for teleconferencing is made available. Albion College is a member of this group, and I see depository opportunities for distance learning with classes and demonstrations about government resources.

    CCHIP, the Calhoun County Health Improvement Program, focuses on health and other public service agencies, hospitals, government units, and the transfer of medical and employment service information. It overlaps somewhat with the Albion College/Community group, particularly with respect to the community hospital and governmental agencies, and I'm not clear how to best mesh assistance with government information for this group with support for the fourth group, the Albion College/Community Project.

    This project provides for the enhancement of communications and educational processes within and between the community of Albion and Albion College by use of the Internet. The mission for Albion College is to provide leadership and a model for resource sharing within the community. Clearly, there is a role here for a Federal depository library. The questions center on how to best fulfill that role.

    The Albion College/Community resource sharing centers on several groups, the kinds I think one would expect in most communities:


    1) The Chamber of Commerce
    2) The community hospital
    3) The Volunteer Center
    4) City hall
    5) Schools
    6) The college
    7) Libraries, including public, school and college libraries which will share their databases using the Z39.50 standard.

    No decision has been made about where public access television will fit into this plan, only that there will be a spot for it.

    I'll briefly mention two somewhat related activities. The Albion College Library, as a depository library, has for some time provided Internet access to Federal publications for patrons who come to the library for assistance or who connect to our library home page; I've maintained a depository home page for some time. However, these services are much more limited than those which will be available when the Albion project is in place.

    We are also in the process of adding five years of retrospective documents cataloging records to our online catalog as well as ongoing shipping list and MARC record services. In the past, users weren't able to tell which publications were in our library without actually searching through the collections. With the shared library databases and this cataloging project, access to the materials in our depository collection will be improved and the information will be readily available to many more people.

    Initially the college/community grant provides for three public access sites for the Internet: the Albion Public Library, the Volunteer Center and the Chamber of Commerce. The college isn't included in this list because we already have Internet access. Computer equipment and phone lines are provided at those public sites as is user support. A Computer Support Coordinator has been hired to provide leadership for training and the coordination of these activities. Through the training it is hoped that we can build a core of local residents who are knowledgeable about the Internet and who can take advantage of it.

    Each of the community access locations serves unique purposes. Thus far I've been providing user guides at the public access sites, the same kinds that I prepare for students, outlining ways to search the Internet for government information. I've compiled instructions outlining the steps to take to get to the documents home page, and I've recommended that people use a guide like Bill Taylor's "GPO Access Searching Tips" which I've listed on our home page.

    At the public library members of the community (rather loosely defined to include the surrounding agricultural and residential areas) can sign up for Great Lakes FreeNet accounts and passwords. The public library has two computers which can be used for Internet searches, and on weekends in particular the sign-up sheets are filled. The library also provides in-library and call-in help, provides handouts with computer set-up instructions, and at cost sells First Class software for the FreeNet.

    In conjunction with this project the Friends of the Public Library have made a substantial donation so the public library can provide free Internet classes. The three-session classes include information about basic applications, hardware and software needs, and guidance in using e-mail and exploring the Internet and the World Wide Web. These classes have been very popular; nine series have been given and more are scheduled.

    The second site, the Chamber of Commerce, provides an Internet public access point for small businesses to encourage economic development and will, at least initially, serve as a site for small business home pages. Companies that choose to develop home pages at the chamber can transfer them to their own computer equipment when they feel comfortable with the new technology.

    The Chamber also plans to serve as a site for a consortium of local businesses where Albion can be advertised as a business setting and where businesses can also advertise their employment needs. Businesses are encouraged to use this site to get the business news and information they need.

    I think that in addition to popular government sources like Commerce Business Daily and the Federal Register, STAT-USA would also be useful, but I don't see how I can provide depository access at the Chamber. I understand that STAT-USA needs to make money, but I also wonder just where the figurative walls of an electronic depository library stand.

    We've heard this issue raised time and time again this week, and the position I would like to take is supported in the Draft Report to Congress which clearly states in the first goal of the "Mission and Goals Statement, "...ensure that the public has equitable, no fee, local access to Government information."

    The Community Volunteer Center will provide the same kinds of access services for agencies and community volunteer groups. As at the other two public access sites, funds will be available to train people in the use of the Internet, but not for maintenance or repair of equipment. It is hoped that in all three locations individuals will form user groups within the community; the initiatives funded by the grant are intended to provide the stimulus to get people started.

    The Community Support Coordinator and I have been working together to see that Federal information can be found and used at the public access Internet sites, and by extension from personal PCs, as well as in our depository library. There are community members who simply don't want to take time to go to the college library to find government information, so I'm trying to make the information accessible at locations which are convenient for them. This is one of the real benefits of electronic access for users, although it makes my in-house community user statistics look rather slim.

    I can see that this outreach plan could expand my job as a depository librarian beyond my limits. Our Community Support Coordinator is particularly enthusiastic about having residents e- mail me questions when they aren't able to find the answers. I know I'm not the only depository librarian who already has more responsibilities than I can keep up with, I've heard others express the same concern this week. Still, as we become more electronically connected to each other I think we will have to be flexible about adapting if we are to remain relevant. I certainly haven't worked out all the implications, and I'd like to hear what other librarians think about the issues these potential changes raise.


    [ Back to the Table of Contents ]

    .

    Internet as a Shared Community/Library Experience in Michigan

    Carolyn Price
    Flint Public Library
    Flint, MI

    FLINT PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMUNITY NETWORKING CENTER

    The Vision

    The Director of the Flint Public Library and the Michigan Mideastern Library Cooperative collaborated on the best way to provide the Flint community with the state of the art networked digital information. Together the ideas of these individuals helped create the living Internet laboratory at the Flint Public Library.

    Funding

    The following organizations participated in the funding of the Internet lab at our library: University of Michigan School of Library and Information Science Crystal Ed Project, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Apple Library of Tomorrow Project, Flint Public Library, Mideastern Michigan Library Cooperative, Library of Michigan, and the Community Stabilization and Revitalization Project.

    .Training

    The training syllabus included advanced strategies for effective use of e-mail, mastery of various protocols such as Gopher, WAIS, and FTP. The librarians identified projects with local focus to practice their new skills. The production and mounting of their projects on the WWW was the end result. The projects included local recycling information, local government officials, local resources of funding for small business, and sources of financial aid on a local level.

    Accomplishments

    Thirty librarians trained in the use of Internet, volunteers trained to assist patrons on use of Internet, development of an information infrastructure at the library necessary for WWW access.


    [ Back to the Table of Contents ]

    .

    FinanceNet and U.S. Business Advisor

    Glynis Long
    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission