[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 345 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
113th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. RES. 345
Strongly supporting the restoration and protection of State authority
and flexibility in establishing and defining challenging student
academic standards and assessments, and strongly denouncing the
President's coercion of States into adopting the Common Core State
Standards by conferring preferences in Federal grants and flexibility
waivers.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
February 6, 2014
Mr. Graham (for himself, Mr. Lee, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Scott, Mr. Inhofe,
Mr. Cochran, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Enzi) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Strongly supporting the restoration and protection of State authority
and flexibility in establishing and defining challenging student
academic standards and assessments, and strongly denouncing the
President's coercion of States into adopting the Common Core State
Standards by conferring preferences in Federal grants and flexibility
waivers.
Whereas education belongs in the hands of our parents, local officials, local
educational agencies, and States;
Whereas the development of the common education standards known as the Common
Core State Standards was originally led by national organizations, but
has transformed into an incentives-based mandate from the Federal
Government;
Whereas in 2009, the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices
(NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO),
both of which are private trade associations, began developing common
education standards for kindergarten through grade 12 (referred to in
this preamble as the ``Common Core State Standards'');
Whereas sections 9527, 9529, 9530, and 9531 of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7907, 7909, 7910, and 7911) prohibit
the establishment of a national curriculum, national testing, mandatory
national teacher certification, and a national student database;
Whereas Federal law makes clear that the Department of Education may not be
involved in setting specific content standards or determining the
content of State assessments in elementary and secondary education;
Whereas President Barack Obama and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan announced
competitive grants through the Race to the Top program under sections
14005 and 14006 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(Public Law 111-5; 123 Stat. 282) (referred to in this preamble as the
``Race to the Top program'') in July 2009;
Whereas, on July 24, 2009, Secretary Duncan stated, ``The $4,350,000,000 Race to
the Top program that we are unveiling today is a once-in-a-lifetime
opportunity for the Federal Government to create incentives for far-
reaching improvement in our Nation's schools.'';
Whereas, on July 24, 2009, Secretary Duncan also stated, ``But I want to be
clear that Race to the Top is also a reform competition, one where
States can increase or decrease their odds of winning Federal
support.'';
Whereas, under the Race to the Top program guidelines, States seeking funds were
pressed to implement 4 core, interconnected reforms, and the first of
these reforms was to adopt ``internationally benchmarked standards and
assessments that prepare students for success in college and the
workplace'';
Whereas, on July 24, 2009, President Obama outlined the connection between
common education standards and Race to the Top program funds, stating,
``I am issuing a challenge to our [N]ation's governors and school
boards, principals and teachers, businesses and non-profits, parents and
students: if you set and enforce rigorous and challenging standards and
assessments; if you put outstanding teachers at the front of the
classroom; if you turn around failing schools--your State can win a Race
to the Top grant that will not only help students outcompete workers
around the world, but let them fulfill their God-given potential.'';
Whereas the selection criteria designed by the Department of Education for the
Race to the Top program provided that for a State to have any chance to
compete for funding, it must commit to adopting a ``common set of K-12
standards'';
Whereas Common Core State Standards establish a single set of education
standards for kindergarten through grade 12 in English language arts and
mathematics that States adopt;
Whereas Common Core State Standards were, during the initial application period
for the Race to the Top program, and remain, as of the date of the
adoption of this resolution, the only common set of kindergarten through
grade 12 standards in the United States;
Whereas, on July 24, 2009, Secretary Duncan stated, ``To speed this process, the
Race to the Top program is going to set aside $350,000,000 to
competitively fund the development of rigorous, common State
assessments.'';
Whereas, since the Race to the Top program's inception, States have been
incentivized by Federal money to adopt common education standards;
Whereas States began adopting Common Core State Standards in 2010;
Whereas States that adopted Common Core State Standards before August 2, 2010,
were awarded 40 additional points out of 500 points for their Race to
the Top program applications;
Whereas 45 States have adopted Common Core State Standards;
Whereas 31 States, of the 45 total, adopted Common Core State Standards before
August 2, 2010;
Whereas States that have adopted Common Core State Standards are given
preference in the application process for the waivers issued under the
authority of section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7861) that provide flexibility with respect to
certain requirements of such Act;
Whereas States that have adopted Common Core State Standards are currently
collaborating to develop common assessments that will be aligned to the
Common Core State Standards and replace existing end-of-the-year State
assessments;
Whereas these assessments will be available in the 2014-2015 school year;
Whereas 2 consortia of States are developing common assessments: the Partnership
for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC);
Whereas national standards lead to national assessments and national assessments
lead to a national curriculum;
Whereas education standards help teachers ensure their students have the skills
and knowledge they need to be successful by providing clear goals for
student learning;
Whereas challenging academic standards are vital to ensuring students are
college and career ready;
Whereas blanket education standards should not be a prerequisite for Federal
funding;
Whereas States are incentivized to adopt Common Core State Standards by the
explicit correlation between the adoption of the Common Core State
Standards by the State and the preference provided to such States
through the Race to the Top program and the flexibility waivers issued
under the authority of section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7861);
Whereas the Secretary of Education has created a system of grants and waivers
that influence, incentivize, and coerce State educational agencies,
commissions, and boards into implementing common elementary and
secondary school standards and assessments endorsed by the Secretary;
Whereas when Federal funds are linked to the adoption of common education
standards, the end result is increased Federal control over education
and a decreased ability of schools to meet the individual needs of the
students in their schools;
Whereas the implementation of Common Core State Standards will eventually impact
home school and private school students when institutions of higher
education are pressured to align their admission and readiness standards
with curricula based on the Common Core State Standards;
Whereas the 10th amendment of the Constitution of the United States reads, ``The
powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively,
or to the people''; and
Whereas, throughout the course of United States history, States have maintained
the responsibility of education based on the 10th amendment because the
explicit power of educating children was not delegated to the United
States by the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, that it is the sense of the Senate that--
(1) States and local educational agencies should maintain
the right and responsibility of determining educational
curricula, programs of instruction, and assessments for
elementary and secondary education;
(2) the Federal Government should not incentivize the
adoption of common education standards or the creation of a
national assessment to align with such standards; and
(3) no application process for any Federal grant funds, or
for waivers issued by the Secretary under the authority of
section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7861), that occurs after the date of adoption
of this resolution should award any additional points, or
provide any preference, for the adoption of the Common Core
State Standards or any other national common education
standards.
<all>