[Congressional Record Volume 154, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 27, 2008)] [Extensions of Remarks] [Page E253] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] PERSONAL EXPLANATION ______ HON. THOMAS H. ALLEN of maine in the house of representatives Wednesday, February 27, 2008 Mr. ALLEN. Madam Speaker, on February 25 and 26, 2008, I was unavoidably absent from the House due to a family illness. If I had been present, I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote #69, a motion by Mr. Courtney of Connecticut to suspend the rules and agree to the passage of H. Res. 978, expressing support for the designation of the week of March 3-7, 2008, as ``School Social Work Week'' to promote awareness of the vital role of school social workers in schools, and in the community as a whole, in helping students prepare for their future as productive citizens. I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote #70, a motion by Mr. Courtney of Connecticut to suspend the rules and agree to the passage of H. Res. 930, supporting the goals and ideals of ``Career and Technical Education Month.'' I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote #71, a motion by Mr. Courtney of Connecticut to suspend the rules and agree to the passage of H. Res. 944, honoring the service and accomplishments of Lieutenant General Russel L. Honore, United States Army, for his 37 years of service on behalf of the United States. I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote #72, on agreeing to the Speaker's approval of the Journal of the last day's proceedings. I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote #73, a motion by Mr. Hastings of Florida to order the previous question on adoption of H. Res. 974, a resolution providing for the consideration of H.R. 3521 to improve the Operating Fund for public housing of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote #74, on agreeing to H. Res. 974, a resolution providing for the consideration of H.R. 3521 to improve the Operating Fund for public housing of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote #75, an amendment offered by Mr. Sires of New Jersey to H.R. 3521. The amendment clarified the intent of an amendment offered by Rep. Velazquez and adopted by the Financial Services Committee by ensuring that public housing authorities that apply to HUD for ``stop-loss'' do not have their applications rejected on the basis that the management and related fees they establish pursuant to this bill are not reasonable as defined by HUD. Additionally, the amendment was a restatement of current law with respect to the ineligibility of illegal immigrants for assistance. I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote #76, an amendment offered by Mr. Meek of Florida to H.R. 3521. The amendment holds HUD responsible, in the case of receivership, for performing the same responsibilities that the local housing agencies have in respect to working with tenant associations before building public housing. Additionally, in the case of receivership, before building new public housing HUD must honor any formal agreements entered into before the commencement of such receivership between the local housing authority and the tenant association. I would have voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote #77, a motion by Mr. Sires of New Jersey to table the motion of Mr. Smith of Texas to appeal the ruling of the chair that the provisions of the amendment contained in the instructions accompanying the motion to recommit offered by Mr. Smith were not germane. I ask unanimous consent that this statement be inserted in the appropriate place in the Record. ____________________