[Congressional Record Volume 160, Number 48 (Wednesday, March 26, 2014)] [Extensions of Remarks] [Page E444] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] PERSONAL EXPLANATION ______ HON. TAMMY DUCKWORTH of illinois in the house of representatives Wednesday, March 26, 2014 Ms. DUCKWORTH. Mr. Speaker, on Tuesday, March 25, 2014, I was unavoidably detained due to a family emergency and missed the following votes: An amendment, offered by Mr. Lowenthal, numbered 1 printed in Part B of House Report 113-374 to require States to implement the June 30, 1983 Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement stream buffer zone rule, unless a State has a program with greater stream protection. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yes'' on this amendment. An amendment, offered by Mr. Cartwright, numbered 2 printed in Part B of House Report 113-374 to ensure that States maintain the ability to issue their own stream buffer rules. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yes'' on this amendment. A Motion to Recommit, offered by Mr. Bera. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yes'' on this amendment. H.R. 2824, a bill to amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to stop the ongoing waste by the Department of the Interior of taxpayer resources and implement the final rule on excess spoil, mining waste, and buffers for perennial and intermittent streams, and for other purposes. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on this bill. H.R. 2824 is another cynical attempt to threaten the clean air and clean water my constituents in Illinois' 8th district rely on. Passage of this bill would undoubtedly open up our precious waterways to toxic mine waste and roll back the gains the Clean Water Act, the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA), and Endangered Species Act have had for our communities. I have voted in the past to limit the materials that can be dumped in our waterways, including an amendment by Mr. Moran on H.R. 2609, and would have voted again to protect the miles of waterways and numerous communities that would be affected under H.R. 2824. ____________________