[House Report 114-901] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] Union Calendar No. 712 114th Congress } { Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session } { 114-901 _______________________________________________________________________ THE REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES of the COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION during the 114TH CONGRESS TOGETHER WITH MINORITY VIEWS [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] December 30, 2016.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed ______ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 23-172 WASHINGTON : 2016 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ---------- House of Representatives, Committee on House Administration, Washington, DC, December 30, 2016. Hon. Karen L. Haas, Clerk of the House, Washington, DC. Dear Madam Clerk: Pursuant to Rule XI, clause 1, paragraph (d) of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, I hereby transmit the Annual Report on the Activities of the Committee on House Administration. This report summarizes the activities of the Committee with respect to its legislative and oversight responsibilities in the 114th Congress from January 2015 to December 2016. Sincerely, Candice S. Miller, Chairman. Union Calendar No. 712 114th Congress } { Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session } { 114-901 ====================================================================== THE REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION DURING THE 114TH CONGRESS _______ December 30, 2016.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed _______ Mrs. Candice S. Miller of Michigan, from the Committee on House Adminstration, submitted the following R E P O R T together with MINORITY VIEWS INTRODUCTION The Committee on House Administration (``Committee'') is charged with the oversight of federal elections and the day-to- day operations of the House of Representatives. The Committee on House Administration oversees appropriations for the salaries and expenses of all House committees (except for the Committee on Appropriations); allowance and expenses of House Members, officers, and administrative offices; and the auditing and settling of these accounts. The Committee further oversees the employment of staff for House Members, committees, and stenographers. The Committee has jurisdiction over the House Library; the statuary and art in the Capitol; the Franking Commission; the Congressional Record; accounts of the House; and the assignment of office space for House Members and committees. The Committee also has the important duty of overseeing the Capitol Police and security of the House office buildings and grounds. Additionally, the Committee's jurisdiction covers the election of the President and Vice President, House Members, Delegates, the Resident Commissioner, and Senators as well as House contested elections, credentials and qualifications of candidates, corrupt practices, and campaign finance matters in federal elections. Regarding Member services, the Committee oversees the House restaurant, parking facilities, and administration of the House office buildings and of the House wing of the Capitol. The Committee also deals with the travel of Members; and the compensation, retirement and other benefits of Members, officers and employees of Congress. Lastly, the Committee has jurisdiction over the Library of Congress, the purchase of books and manuscripts, the Botanic Garden, and the Smithsonian Institution. COMMITTEE FUNDING The Committee on House Administration reports a biennial primary expense resolution by which standing and select committees of the House (except the Committee on Appropriations) are authorized operating funds for each Congress. During the first three months of each new Congress, House Rule X, clause 7, provides a temporary authorization for House committees to continue operations. This temporary authorization is based on their funding authorizations from the preceding session and allows committees to organize, adopt legislative and oversight agendas, and seek spending authority through the adoption of a primary expense resolution by the House. On March 4, 2015 the Committee met to consider House Resolution 132, providing for the expenses of certain committees of the House of Representatives for the 114th Congress. The amounts proposed in H. Res. 132 reflect the justifications provided to the Committee by the Chairs and Ranking Members during their testimony at the Committee Hearing held on February 11, 2015. The Committee approved H. Res, 132 by voice vote. On March 19, 2015, the House, again by voice vote, agreed to the Resolution. On November 19, 2015, the Committee adopted Committee Resolution 114-10, which allocated $300,000 from the Reserve Fund created in H. Res. 132 to the Committee on Energy and Commerce for purposes of funding a portion of the operations of its Select Investigative Panel. On June 17, 2016, the Committee adopted Committee Resolution 114-19, which allocated $490,000 from the Reserve Fund created in H. Res. 132 to the Committee on Energy and Commerce for purposes of funding a portion of the operations of its Select Investigative Panel. On November 15, 2016, the Committee considered and adopted H. Res. 933, which authorized the final installment of funding, $800,000, to the Committee on Energy and Commerce for purposes of funding a portion of the operations of its Select Investigative Panel. On December 1, 2016, the House of Representatives considered and adopted by a vote of 234-181, H. Res. 933, which provided the final installment of funding, $800,000, to the Committee on Energy and Commerce for purposes of funding a portion of the operations of its Select Investigative Panel. MEMBERS' REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCE The Committee has jurisdiction over the use of appropriations from the accounts of the U.S. House of Representatives for the Members' Representational Allowance (``MRA'') as well as official travel by Members and staff, and compensation, retirement and other benefits of Member office employees. The MRA is the annual authorization made to each Member of the House to obligate U.S. Treasury funds not to exceed a certain amount. These funds may be used by the Member to pay ordinary and necessary business expenses incurred by the Member and his or her congressional office employees in support of the conduct of the Member's official and representational duties on behalf of the district from which the Member is elected. The annual MRA is available for one legislative year (i.e., January 3 of one year through January 2 of the following year). The MRA is made up of three primary expense components: personnel compensation, official expenses, and official (franked) mail expenses. The amount of the MRA varies from Member to Member based on the distance of a Member's district from Washington, D.C., the cost to lease federal office space in a Member's district, and the number of U.S. Postal Service private delivery stops in a Member's district. The use of funds in any expense category is not limited by the amount factored into a corresponding expense component, e.g., a Member may spend more or less than the amount of the travel component to travel and from his or her district. Each Member has complete discretion in budgeting the total amount of his or her MRA as he or she determines to support the operation of his or her Washington, D.C., and district congressional offices, consistent with applicable Federal law and House Rules and regulations. Federal law authorizes the Committee to fix and adjust the amounts, terms, and conditions of, and other matters relating to the MRA (including all aspects of official mail) by reason of: 1. A change in the price of materials, services, or office space; 2. A technological change or other improvement in office equipment; or 3. An increase in rates of pay under the General Schedule, e.g., a comparability and/or locality wage adjustment. During the 114th Congress, the Committee took the following actions pertaining to the Member's Representational Allowance: On February 8, 2016, the Committee set authorization amounts for each of the 441 Members of the House of Representatives for the legislative year starting on January 3, 2016, until January 2, 2017. The amounts were authorized with a 1% increase to each of the 114th Congress first session amounts. On March 16, 2016, the Committee on House Administration considered and adopted updates to the following regulations: Members' Congressional Handbook; Committee Congressional Handbook; Guide to Outfitting and Maintaining an Office; and Regulations pursuant to H. Res. 5 regarding Congressional Member Organizations. COMMISSION ON CONGRESSIONAL MAILING STANDARDS The Franking Commission, established by Public Law 93-191, is composed of six Members appointed by the Speaker of the House: three from the majority, and three from the minority. The Speaker designates as Chairman of the Franking Commission one of the Members appointed to the Commission, who must also be a Member of the Committee on House Administration. In the 114th Congress, the Commission was chaired by Rep. Candice S. Miller of Michigan, with Rep. Susan A. Davis of California serving as Ranking Member, and joined by Commission Members Rep. Robert E. Latta of Ohio, Rep. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Rep. Brad Sherman of California, and Rep. Cedric Richmond of Louisiana. By law, House Rule and regulation, the jurisdiction and related functions of the Franking Commission are: 1. To prescribe regulations governing the proper use of the franking privilege by those entitled to use the privilege in connection with the mailing or contemplated mailing of franked mail under 39 U.S.C. sections 3210, 3211, 3212, 3213(2), 3218, 3219 or in connection with the operation of section 3215; in connection with any other Federal law (other than any law which imposes any criminal penalty), or in connection with any Rule of the U.S. House of Representatives relating to franked mail (2 U.S.C. 501(d)). 2. Upon the request of any person entitled to use the franking privilege and other official communication resources, to provide guidance, assistance, advice, and counsel, through Advisory Opinions or consultations, in connection with the distribution or contemplated distribution of franked mail or official communications regarding the application and/or compliance with applicable Federal statutes and House Rules and regulations. The staff assigned to the Commission is delegated authority by the Commission to perform advisory and counseling functions, subject to review by the Commission. (2 U.S.C. 501(d), House Rule XXIV, and the Regulations of the Committee on House Administration). 3. To investigate, decide, and dispose of complaints regarding the misuse of the franking privilege (2 U.S.C. 501(e)). On June 9, 2015 the Commission agreed by unanimous vote to issue an advisory opinion on Cedric Richmond request number 47853-11, ruling that it is permissible to include in an official mailing or communication, information from a private source which refers to specific instructional or educational material about emergency preparedness, survival, and relief. Any such reference may not be the sole purpose of the communication and may not promote, endorse, or solicit on behalf of any organization. On October 29, 2015 the Commission amended the Regulations on the Use of the Congressional Frank by Members of the House of Representatives to permit the use of franked mail in support of officially-sanctioned competitions as authorized in the Members Congressional Handbook. At the time of filing this report, the Franking Commission had reviewed 12,850 requests for advisory opinions and issued 10,083 final advisory opinions during the 114th Congress. Staff of the Franking Commission travelled with the Committee on House Administration and the Committee on Ethics to meet with the governments of the United Kingdom and Canada from August 16th through 24th. The purpose of the trip was to meet with legislators and leadership of the regulatory agencies that govern the use of franked mail and official resources. The meetings informed policy and oversight considerations as the Commission considers proposals on social media, advertising, postal transactions, and public disclosure. On August 31, 2016 the Franking Commission received a complaint filed pursuant to the Rules of Practice in Proceedings before the House Commission on Congressional Mailing Standards. On October 17, 2016, the Commission issued an order to dismiss the complaint by unanimous vote pursuant to Rule 3 of the Rules of Practice in Proceedings before the House Commission on Congressional Mailing Standards, having determined that there was no reason to believe that a violation had occurred as alleged in the complaint. Effective January 3, 1996, all communications required to receive an Advisory Opinion from the Franking Commission are subject to full public disclosure. Communications that require an Advisory Opinion prior to distribution, publication, dissemination, etc. include mass mailings, and mass communications (regardless of medium) as defined by 39 U.S.C. section 3210(a)(6)(E) and the Members Congressional Handbook. The Franking Commission is responsible for monitoring requests to review Advisory Opinions filed at the Legislative Resource Center to ensure that the applicable public disclosure requirements are fully complied with. It is the practice of the Franking Commission to provide notice to a Member whenever his or her public disclosure file has been reviewed in whole or in part. OVERSIGHT AND LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE The Committee continues to work with House Leadership and Legislative Branch Appropriations to reduce overall costs and efficiently manage House operations. Officers of the House One of the responsibilities of the Committee is to conduct oversight of the Officers of the House, whose organizations serve primary roles in legislative operations and the day-to- day administrative and operational infrastructure necessary to support the Members and staff of the House. Clerk of the House The Office of the Clerk is charged with overseeing nine departments including the Office of Art and Archives, the Legislative Resource Center, and the Office of Official Reporters. The Clerk's primary responsibilities involve the legislative activities of the House. This includes managing the bills originating in the House as well as overseeing the voting system. The Committee worked with several of the Clerk's subdivisions on projects throughout the past two years, including the Historian, to produce the Hispanic Americans in Congress book in e-Book format in January 2015. The Committee also encouraged the Clerk to publish an online phone book for staff to increase the timeliness of the information and reduce printing costs. The online phone book was launched in August 2016. The Committee also heard testimony from the Clerk regarding her FY16 priorities in its June 3, 2015 hearing on ``House Officer Priorities for 2016 and Beyond.'' During the hearing the Committee received an update on the upgrade of the House's Electronic Voting System, a critical component of the House's Legislative operations. The new system, which includes new voting stations and cards, is to be complete in August 2017. The Clerk continued to co-chair the Bulk Data Task Force and to work with Committee staff to implement continued progress in transparency and digital transformation in the House. The House Rules for the 114th Congress continued to call for greater transparency and accessibility to legislative information. Among other things, the Rules instructed the Clerk of the House to make available electronically each memorial pertaining to Article V of the Constitution of the United States and added a requirement that parallel citations for amendatory instructions to Public Laws and Statutes at Large that are not classified in the U.S. Code be included in proposed legislation. House Bill Summaries were made available as XML bulk data on the FDsys Bulk Data Repository. Senate bill summaries were added to this collection in January 2015. In April, 2015 the House Clerk began publishing some Member data in XML format. The Speaker announced an initiative to publically provide all forms of law in XML format. The Office of the Clerk is coordinating this project with the Government Publishing Office and the Office of the Federal Register. The Clerk worked with the Committee on House Administration to develop a standard for House Committee Hearing documents. A pilot project produced sample hearings for review. The Joint Committee on Printing has tasked GPO to operationalize the Hearing Modernization project to increase transparency and reduce the cost of producing hearings. Sergeant-at-Arms and the United States Capitol Police The House Sergeant-at-Arms (`HSAA') is responsible for maintaining the security of the House side of the Capitol Grounds and for ensuring the security of Members of Congress, staff, and visitors. Oversight of the House Sergeant-at-Arms and the United States Capitol Police (`USCP') continued to be a priority for the Committee. In order to receive regular updates regarding security in both Washington and in Member districts, the Committee meets with both the HSAA and the USCP on a regular basis. The Committee coordinated with the HSAA and other House officers to continually reassess House security policies and procedures, and monitored both new and ongoing projects. HSAA and USCP made enhanced security screening efforts a priority for the House campus and District Offices. The Committee coordinated extensively with USCP, HSAA, Leadership, and other committees of jurisdiction to achieve successful installation of screening measures at garage entrances in the Longworth, and Cannon underground garages and Ford House Office Buildings. The Committee will continue to work with HSAA and USCP to plan for similar improvements in the Rayburn and Cannon House Office Buildings. The Committee worked closely with the HSAA to provide Member District Offices with mail screening hoods. Finally, CHA passed a Committee resolution determining that the management and operation of safes in the House buildings will now be managed by the Sergeant at Arms rather than the Chief Administrative Officer. The Committee continues to work with both organizations to implement the transition and additional recommendations from the House Inspector General related to the program. On May 20, 2015, the Committee held a hearing inviting Chief Kim Dine of the USCP to testify regarding management challenges within USCP and his vision for the force. The hearing revealed his plan for the Department, and organizational and operational changes followed in the months after the hearing. Chief Dine announced his eventual retirement in August of 2015, and the Committee met frequently with the HSAA and Capitol Police Board regarding the search for a new Chief of Police. When Chief Matthew Verderosa was sworn-in, the Committee held a hearing in May of 2016 regarding his priorities as the Department transitioned under his leadership. Preceding the hearing, the Committee reported favorably a bill allowing USCP to accept and dispose of surplus property, bringing them into line with other federal law enforcement agencies. Chief Administrative Officer The Office of the Chief Administrative Officer (`CAO') supports the budget, finance, procurement, logistics, and information technology needs of the House and all of its components. The Committee is charged with overseeing the CAO and its support staff. After the retirement of the previous CAO, Ed Cassidy, on December 31, 2015, Will Plaster temporarily assumed the role of CAO for seven months. Pursuant to H. Res. 826, Philip G. Kiko was sworn in as CAO effective August 1, 2016. Over the past two years, the Committee worked with the CAOs and his staff on a variety of cost-savings and process improvement initiatives, policies, and programs throughout all facets of the organization. The Committee continued the oversight over the CAO's management of the House finances and financial system. The CAO, in cooperation with both the Committee and the Inspector General, continues to make progress on improving internal controls over IT systems, financial reporting, and property and equipment. As part of the Member Expense Review, the Committee reviewed the voucher review and approval process within the CAO. Based on this review, the Committee worked with the CAO to make numerous training and process improvements to ensure that all expenses submitted for reimbursement are in compliance with Committee regulations and have the required supporting documentation. The Committee also used this process to revise the Voucher Documentation Standards, which had not been updated since 2010. Working with the CAO, the Committee provided training for all financial administrators and financial counselors and implemented the new voucher standards on October 1, 2016. Also as part of the Member Expense Review, the Committee directed the CAO to make improvements to the transparency of Member expenses, including more precise descriptions of Office travel expenses in the Statements of Disbursement (SOD), which are published quarterly. The Committee also directed the CAO to publish the SOD in open formats that are more easily searchable and sortable. A significant portion of the Congress was spent on coordinating and planning transition activities with the CAO. The Committee approved the 115th Congress Transition Policies covering everything from mobile device policies to the shipment of Member papers to VOIP and broadband policies for the district offices. The 115th Congress Standard Lease templates and approval processes were also updated to include a broadband requirement. Lastly, the Committee approved the Master Contract for CMS and Maintenance Providers for the House. This master contract included two new vendors increasing the CMS options for House Offices. The Committee continued to exercise its responsibility over the CAO through the review and approval of the Food Services RFP and contract. In August 2015, the newly selected vendor, Sodexo, transitioned into the House while bringing with it, a Subway deli in Rayburn, a Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins in Longworth, and other welcome renovations and changes in the Longworth Caf. Lastly, the Committee was proud to approve the expansion of the House's Wounded Warrior Program in October 2015. The CAO- managed program provides a wonderful opportunity for Member Offices to employ a wounded warrior in their DC or District Offices for a two year period. The program has had 50 positions since its inception in 2008 and it now has 54 fellowships which are widely sought after. The Committee will continue to work with the CAO to see if further expansion is possible while also maintaining the same budget. OTHER OVERSIGHT AND LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE House Information Resources Throughout the Congress, the Committee worked with House Information Resources (`HIR') to improve technology services for the House community. These services included the approval of new hardware and software standards, faster district internet connectivity, and support for cloud based services including Office 365 and district office telephone support. CHA worked with HIR to complete the House's Technology Vendor Agreements for the 115th Congress. The Committee conducted oversight over HIR's technology support for Member offices, including the support for the over 900 district offices throughout the United States. At the Direction of the Committee, HIR has transitioned over 100 district offices to internet-based connections to improve speed and will continue this transition next Congress. HIR is evaluating options to reduce costs and increase mobility for district office telephone support. The Committee continued to examine HIR's management of various technology service vendors and approved incremental improvements to policies and procedures governing these vendors. The Committee believes additional changes are warranted to these programs to better serve Member needs and reduce costs. Like any governmental organization, the House must continually evolve its cybersecurity capabilities to meet changing threats. The Committee continued the review of HIR's security policies and procedures and worked with HIR to make improvements where warranted. The Committee approved the issuance of cybersecurity policies to address strengthening training requirements, network security, privileged account management, and cloud usage policies. Finally, the Committee continued to examine HIR's effort to improve technology governance, including efforts to improve strategic planning, service management and enterprise architecture. Inspector General House Rule II creates the Office of the Inspector General (`OIG') and charges the Committee with oversight of the office. During the past two years, the OIG produced twelve management advisory reports and thirteen audit reports. Of particular note were the FY 2014 and FY 2015 House Financial Statement Audits which the Committee released on May 20, 2015 and April 26, 2016 respectively. The House received unqualified or `clean' opinions on its financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting. The FY15 audit was the eighteenth consecutive `clean' audit the House has received. At the Committee's direction, the House Inspector General worked with the Officers of the House in 2015 to develop a strategic plan for the continued improvement of House operations. The plan focused on improving governance over information technology, service delivery to House offices, and physical security initiatives. As a result of this work, the Committee formed staff working groups on technology governance and service delivery that developed a number of recommendations for implementation in the next Congress. The Architect of the Capitol The Architect of the Capitol (`AOC') is responsible for the maintenance, operation, development, and preservation of the entire Capitol Complex, which includes 17.4 million square feet of building space and more than 460 acres of land. Certain decisions regarding management of the House office buildings and the House side of the Capitol reside with the House Office Building Commission, but the Committee supervises and oversees AOC implementation of its programs. The Committee met regularly with the House Office Building Superintendent, his senior staff, and other AOC management and staff during the period of this report. In addition, regular meetings with the Architect of the Capitol were held to review critical items and projects. The Committee continued to monitor AOC operations, including the completion of work addressing the Americans with Disabilities Act requirements, the operations of the AOC's Office of Security Programs, issues related to the newly leased O'Neill Building, and the continued planning and implementation of the Capitol Dome renewal project. The Committee significantly expanded oversight of the Cannon renovation, as that project has now begun and will require the relocation of 31 Member suites beginning in January 2017. Along with the Appropriations Committee and the House Office Building Commission, the Committee continued to review the AOC governance of this ten-year project. The Committee initiated a working group to meet and address any issues related to the project. Participants include House Administration, House Leadership staff, Appropriations Committee Staff, House Officers, USCP, and the AOC. The group has developed a targeted communications plan to inform the House community about the project, especially issues related to Member office moves and other disruption to the House community that are inevitable in a project of this size, scope and duration. In June 2016, the House Superintendent discovered elevated lead levels in water sources in the Cannon House Office Building. The Committee assisted the AOC in developing a communications and outreach strategy to relay to Members and staff what was happening as well as the remedy to identify and fix the problem. The Committee also coordinates with the management team of the Congressional Visitors Center, and met regularly to ensure visitor operations are running effectively. A point of Committee emphasis was the CVC's ability to adapt tours throughout 2015 and 2016, as the Capitol experienced temporary periods where the Rotunda was closed due to the Dome Restoration. Finally, the Committee worked with the AOC and House Superintendent to ensure a smooth transition period for both new and departing Members. Office of Congressional Accessibility Services The Office of Congressional Accessibility Services (`OCAS') was created by the Capitol Visitor Center Act of 2008. OCAS operates under the direction of the Congressional Accessibility Services Board and is charged with providing and coordinating accessibility services for individuals with disabilities including Members of Congress, officers and employees of the House and Senate, and visitors to the U.S. Capitol Complex. The Committee on House Administration is charged with overseeing the agency and meets with OCAS quarterly. The Committee met with the OCAS Director on a variety of accessibility issues impacting Member and committee offices and the public including, but not limited to, sign language interpreting services, assistive listening services, accessibility training, accessible tours, and House intranet improvements for accessibility resources and maps. Finally, OCAS was charged with accommodating guests with accessibility requirements for the historic visit of Pope Francis to address Congress. The Committee coordinated with the Director to ensure OCAS received the support and resources it required for such a large-scale event. Library of Congress and Joint Committee on the Library Committee staff met regularly with Library management to monitor and review operations, services, and planning initiatives. The Committee reviewed the storage capabilities of Library of Congress and worked with the Library to develop alternate solutions to the challenges the backlog creates. The Committee also worked with the Library on specific projects of value to the House community, such as the development and communication of updates on Congress.gov and LIS websites to Members and staff. The Committee also coordinated with the Library on transitioning away from Thomas.gov. A significant point of emphasis for the Committee's Oversight of the Library was Library IT infrastructure and continuity abilities. A series of IT outages and incidents, as well as a pair of critical GAO reports related to Library IT capabilities spurred concerns about the Library's ability to manage and develop its systems. The Committee coordinated closely with the Library during its search for a Chief Information Officer, and has met regularly with Bud Barton after he was hired. Regular progress meetings are used to assess the Library's status. In addition to Library IT systems, the Committee explored the user experiences and IT capabilities for the U.S. Copyright Office. GAO concluded that there were fundamental challenges facing how the Copyright Office managed customer work flows, and proposed technological solutions did little to address the critical problems. In December of 2015, the Committee held a hearing with the Acting Librarian of Congress David Mao, Register of Copyrights Maria Pallante, and the Managing Director for Information Technology at GAO Joel Willemssen. The hearing explored how both organizations were focusing their resources and priorities to adapt to the digital age. In the aftermath of the hearing, the Committee has held numerous follow-up meetings and sent additional correspondence to continue its Oversight. During the Committee markup in May of 2016, multiple bills were reported favorably related to the Library's operations. H.R. 4511, the Gold Star Families Act expanded the Library's Veterans' History Project to include stories from immediate family members of soldiers who were killed or are missing in action. On November 28, 2016, the President signed the bill into law becoming Public Law 114-246. In addition, the Committee voted to reauthorize the Library's National Film and Sound Recording Preservation Boards and Foundations. Finally, the Committee passed H.R. 5227, the Library of Congress Modernization Act. This bill would institute a number of administrative reforms for the Library. These include allowing the Library to purchase and provide refreshable braille displays for users of the Library's National Service for the Blind, establishing a National Collection Stewardship fund that is intended to provide the Library with consistent financial resources and flexibility in addressing its storage issues, and finally establishing continuity on the Joint Committee on the Library during the transition into a new Congress. The Committee also reported favorably H.R. 4092, sponsored by Mr. Brady, to reauthorize the sound record and film preservation programs of the Library of Congress. A similar bill, S. 2893, was signed by the President on July 29, 2016 and became Public Law 114-217. One final example of the Committee exercising its oversight with Library operations took place after the Library announced their intent to reorganize certain subject headings referring to the term ``illegal alien.'' After meeting with the Committee to discuss such a change, it was discovered that the Library had not yet completed its appropriate process to formally propose or process the action. The Library is currently still proceeding through appropriate steps in evaluating subject heading changes. The Joint Committee on the Library (`JCL') has no legislative authority but is tasked with oversight of the Library of Congress, the Congressional Research Service, and the United States Botanic Garden (USBG), as well as management of the National Statuary Hall Collection. In this role, the JCL reviewed extended hours requests for the USBG for the Holiday season and Titan Arum exhibit, as well as special educational events for the general public. For the Library of Congress, the JCL reviewed special art and exhibit requests, donations to collections, and special operational projects. In addition, the JCL worked with the AOC on multiple requests for Statue Replacement and relocations related to the National Statuary Hall Collection. Finally, the JCL approved Trust Fund Board Resolutions relating to critical issues for the Library. Fine Arts Board The House Fine Arts Board is comprised of the five House Members of the Joint Committee on the Library. It has authority over works of fine art and historical objects that are the property of Congress and are for display in the House wing of the Capitol or in the House Office Buildings. The Board also accepts gifts of fine art and historical objects on behalf of the House, and the Clerk maintains the collection. During the past two years, the Fine Arts Board approved requests to organize portrait fund Committees for Chairman Jeb Hensarling, Chairman Jeff Miller, Chairman John Kline, Chairman Fred Upton, and Chairman Paul Ryan. Further, the Board approved the acceptance and deed of gift for the portraits of Representative Frank Lucas, Representative Harold Rogers, Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Representative Louise Slaughter, Representative John Kline, Former Representative Richard Pombo, Former Representative John Spratt, and Former Representative Henry Waxman which will be added to the House Collection. Lastly, on June 8, 2016, the Board approved the House's acquisition of the 19th century painting of the first Dean of the House, the Honorable Thomas Newton, Jr., of Virginia. Joint Committee on Printing and U.S. Government Publishing Office The Government Publishing Office (`GPO') produces, preserves and distributes the official publications and information products of the Congress and Federal government. By House rule, the Committee on House Administration has oversight of and legislative jurisdiction over the Government Publishing Office. By law, the Chairman of the Committee on House Administration and the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration serve with four other Members of each committee on the Joint Committee on Printing (`JCP'). The bicameral JCP exercises certain authority over federal printing policy, congressional printing and administration of the GPO. Throughout the Congress the Committee worked closely with GPO on the production, communication and distribution of several publications including the 114th Congressional Directory, the 114th Congress Pictorial Directory, and the President's 2016 and 2017 budgets. These books were produced in both physical and electronic copies. In addition to fulfilling requests for these publications, the Committee responded to numerous requests on a weekly basis for other Congressional publications including Pocket Constitutions, Our Flag, Our American Government, and How Our Laws Are Made. Smithsonian The Committee serves as the primary legislative and oversight body for the Smithsonian Institution, a federal trust instrumentality composed of 19 museums, numerous research centers, and the National Zoo. Approximately two-thirds of the Institution's funding is from direct federal appropriations. Governance of the Smithsonian is vested in a 17-member Board of Regents, consisting of the Chief Justice, Vice President, six Members of Congress and nine citizen regents nominated by the Board and approved by a joint resolution of Congress. In 2015, the Smithsonian Board of Regents nominated David Rubenstein for reappointment to a second term as a citizen regent. Legislation providing for this appointment was introduced and referred to the Committee. In March 2015, Committee Members met with Mr. Rubenstein to discuss Smithsonian governance and assess the nominees' views and qualifications. Subsequently, the House approved the legislation by unanimous consent. (H.J. Res. 10 on March 26, 2015) On June 17, 2015, the Committee held an oversight hearing on ``The State of the Smithsonian.'' The Committee received testimony from Albert G. Horvath, Acting Secretary of the Smithsonian. The hearing provided an overview of the challenges and opportunities confronting the new Secretary who assumed office on July 1, 2015 and updated on the Committee the Smithsonian's progress regarding collections stewardship. The Committee received testimony from Acting Secretary Horvath on the Smithsonian's ongoing effort to reduce their deferred maintenance backlog and on their Collections Space Framework Plan which documents the need for more than one million square feet of new collection space over the next 30 years. Acting Secretary Horvath also updated the Committee on the National Museum of African American History and Culture construction project and on efforts to satisfy several Smithsonian Inspector General recommendations in the area of collection stewardship, most of which were closed out or nearly closed out. On June 22, 2016, the Committee held an oversight hearing on ``Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum Revitalization.'' The Committee received testimony from David J. Skorton, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution and Albert G. Horvath, Undersecretary for Finance and Administration. The purpose of the hearing was to conduct congressional oversight of a federally-funded facilities revitalization project at one of the most-visited museums in the world and to explore the need for renovation, alternatives considered, cost and funding, impact on visitor experience during the renovation, and the need for new collections storage facilities. Smithsonian officials assured the Committee that the proposed phased revitalization plan, rather than construction of a new facility, is the most cost-effective option with the least impact on visitors, as half of the museum would remain open during the renovation. The Smithsonian informed the Committee that construction of a new collections storage module at the Udvar-Hazy facility is an integral component of the Air and Space Museum project, serving as temporary swing space for items moved out of the Mall museum during the renovation. On April 29, 2016, H.R. 5160, a bill to include as part of the National Gallery of Art all buildings, service roads, walks, and other areas within the exterior boundaries of any real estate or interest in land that the Gallery acquires was introduced and referred to the Committee. This expansion provides the National Gallery policing authority required to protect their property and the visiting public in any buildings or spaces it acquires, including temporary space. On May 17, 2016, the Committee ordered H.R. 5160 to be favorably reported by voice vote. On June 16, 2016, the Committee filed H. Rept. 114-626 and the same day H.R. 5160 was placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 485. On November 29, 2016, the House agreed to passage of H.R. 5160 without objection. Committee staff conducted several site visits to various Smithsonian facilities. Three site visits (May 27, 2015, July 13, 2016, and September 23, 2016) were conducted to view progress on the construction of the National Museum of African American History and Culture which opened to the public on September 24, 2016. On June 5, 2015, Committee staff visited the Smithsonian Museum Support Center in Suitland, Maryland to view the condition of storage facilities and ongoing efforts to preserve existing artifacts. On October 14, 2015, Committee staff visited the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center in Edgewater, Maryland, to review ongoing long-term research projects and the Center's outreach and engagement initiatives. On November 12, 2015, Committee staff visited the Smithsonian's Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Chantilly, Virginia to review and discuss plans for constructing a new storage module, the NASM Master Plan, and the Center's outreach and engagement programs with senior Center staff. On May 24, 2016, Committee staff visited the National Air and Space Museum on the National Mall to inspect the outer envelope and support systems of the building in anticipation of a Committee hearing on the subject that was held on June 22, 2016. Committee staff also conducted an oversight visit to the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) in the Republic of Panama from February 14, 2016 through February 19, 2016. The purpose of the oversight trip was to meet the new STRI leadership team and to follow up on a 2013 Inspector General report detailing some weaknesses in financial management at STRI and to discuss corrective actions taken to address them. The Committee also reviewed construction and facilities maintenance projects including the new Gamboa Laboratory facility at STRI. Throughout the 114th Congress, the Committee has been engaged in oversight of the Institution through ongoing discussions, meetings and briefings with Smithsonian staff and the Inspector General on various topics including construction of the National Museum of African American History and Culture; financial management; agendas for the Board of Regents meetings; the impact of reduced federal appropriations on Smithsonian activities; and budgetary matters. Office of Compliance The Office of Compliance (``OOC'') was created by the Congressional Accountability Act (``CAA'') to facilitate the application of statutes identified in the CAA to Congress. The Committee has oversight over the OOC, and bipartisan Committee staff meets monthly with OOC leadership to discuss their initiatives and any issues arising in the course of OOC operations. Elections On March 4, 2015, the Committee met to mark up H.R. 195, the ``Election Assistance Commission Termination Act,'' and H.R. 412, ``To reduce Federal spending and the deficit by terminating taxpayer financing of presidential election campaigns.'' Both bills were reported favorably by the Committee. Following the November 8, 2016 federal elections, the Committee sent Democratic and Republican staff to 3 congressional contests to serve as observers and to collect evidence regarding the conduct of the election on behalf of the Committee. The Committee sent observers to the Seventh, Tenth, and Forty-Ninth Districts of California. House Office of Legislative Counsel and Law Revision Counsel Modernization Project The Committee worked with the House Office of Legislative Counsel (`HOLC'), the Office of Law Revision Counsel (`LRC'), leadership, and the Office of the Clerk on legislative modernization projects. One goal of the LRC is to maintain a complete, authoritative, accurate, and consolidated version of the U.S. Code. Since the original release of the U.S. Code in XML in July of 2013, the LRC has continued to update the U.S. Code on a timely basis and make it available for downloads in XML. This has been enthusiastically received by the Hill community and the public at large. The Committee also supported continued modernization of the LRC's codification tools, including the development of a side-by-side comparison tool to show changes in existing law being proposed by the LRC's bills. The Committee continues to work with these offices to implement other aspects of the Legislative Modernization Initiative including the Amendment Impact Program (`AIP') which provides Members and staff rapid access to the impacts that proposed amendments have to the underlying bill or resolution and a new tool (legislative look up and link, or ``LLL'') to enable a user to readily look up and link to a law that is being referenced in a bill or other document. HOLC is now using AIP internally for quality control in its drafting of amendments and Rules Committee has begun testing the use of AIP in connection with amendments offered at the Committee. EDUCATIONAL AND OUTREACH ACTIVITIES Outreach and Communications Training: The Committee launched a professional development training series for Members' DC and District staffs. Committee staff initially focused on the basics of individual job responsibilities, learning about other positions in the office, and working with Committee and Leadership staff. Additionally, Committee staff offered training on all the services the Committee and the House Officers provide to Members and their staff. The Committee expanded the professional development training in 2016, cohosting with the Speaker's office, to launch the first Committee training series specifically focused on Oversight Best Practices for Committees. This is the first training series of its kind and staff will look to host future series on additional topics for Committee staff. The Committee on House Administration is helping to educate Financial Administrators as well as other house staffers on the new voucher documentation standards through a series of briefings as well as webinars. The educational briefings and webinars emphasize the importance of documentation standards, increase awareness on documentation submission practices and prepare Financial Administrators for the implementation of the new changes. The Committee has increased one-on-one educational outreach on rules and regulations on franking/official communication rules with a strong focus on rules surrounding evolving social media platforms. The Committee designed and put on a new Designated Aide program for staff attending with the New Members for orientation. This program helps aides prepare for their Member's swearing in and their first two years in office. New Joint Guidance Document for House Staff: Straight to the Source is a joint guidance document regularly produced by the Committee on House Administration and the Committee on Ethics designed to address pressing and important questions in congressional offices. The topics we will address have overlapping jurisdiction with House Administration & Ethics, and this document is intended to provide clarity on those items. Helping Departing Members: The Committee has been working to ensure a smooth congressional transition with increased outreach to departing member offices. This has included not only training/helping incoming members via NMO but providing increased personal assistance to departing offices. New Member Orientation The Committee is responsible for coordinating the orientation program and associated travel and logistics for newly elected Members of Congress and their designated aides. The program was held during the week of November 14-18, 2016, and continued during the week of November 28-December 2, 2016. Over the course of the two-week bipartisan New Member Orientation, the Committee facilitated training on the Members' Congressional Handbook, the Franking Commission, practical guidance on setting up a congressional office, an overview of procedures on the House Floor, an introduction to the legislative process, and several Member-led panels on relevant topics. The Members-elect were also given presentations from the House Officers, the Committee on Ethics, the Office of the General Counsel, the Office of Compliance, the Office of House Employment Counsel, and the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer. The Committee utilized a digital binder system to disseminate all materials associated with the Orientation. Congressional Internship Program for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities During the period of this report, the internship program, which started in 2010, had its highest level of participation since its creation. The bipartisan program had 56 House and Senate offices participate in the program since Fall 2015. Over the life of the program more than 150 unique offices have hosted interns. The Committee intends to continue to build on the success of the program established by Representative Harper. Summer Intern Lecture Series The Congressional Summer Intern Lecture Series is a bipartisan, bicameral effort coordinated annually by the Committee on House Administration and the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration. Started by former Representatives Gerald Ford and Donald Rumsfeld in the 1960s, both committees extend invitations, mostly to current and former government and military officials, policy experts, and media personalities, to speak to congressional interns. There were a total of 33 lectures over the two-month period between June 1, 2016 and July 26, 2016, with a lecture nearly every day during that time. Notable speakers from this year's series included the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Paul Selva; Speaker of the House, Paul D. Ryan; House Democratic Leader, Nancy Pelosi; Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson; Secretary of the Department of Transportation, Anthony Foxx; and NASA Administrator, Major General Charles Bolden (USMC-Ret.). Parking Policy Committee staff conducted regular oversight of House Parking Security to ensure compliance with the parking policy. MINORITY VIEWS OF RANKING MEMBER ROBERT A. BRADY, REPRESENTATIVE ZOE LOFGREN AND REPRESENTATIVE JUAN VARGAS MASSIVE RENOVATION OF SMITHSONIAN NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum collects, preserves, studies, and exhibits artifacts, archival materials, and works of art related to the history, culture, and science of aviation and spaceflight and the study of the universe. It holds the largest collection of historic air and spacecraft in the world. Its two landmark facilities--on the National Mall, and in Chantilly, Virginia--together welcome more than eight million visitors a year, making it the most visited museum in the United States and the second most visited in the world, behind only the Louvre in Paris. It was designed for 2 million visitors, but current annual attendance is 7-8 million, increasing wear and tear on the building and its infrastructure. At a Committee oversight hearing on June 22, 2016, which introduced Secretary David Skorton to the Committee, we were surprised by the funding estimated to be needed for renovations of the Museum on Independence Avenue in Washington, D.C. The Museum had been built by the General Services Administration (GSA) ``on the cheap'' for the 1976 Bicentennial, but its design and construction materials proved wholly inadequate for the succeeding decades of massive public use and proper maintenance of the collections. Construction in that era used techniques, including very thin marble sheeting on the outside, which the Smithsonian does not employ on its modern construction projects. This has resulted in a structure with a shorter lifespan than would have been the case had it been constructed with a larger initial funding commitment and modern technologies. As a result, the building suffers from serious structural problems 40 years later, including a deteriorating marble facade with stone falling off the building, inadequate heating and cooling systems, and water infiltration. The exterior marble ``cladding'' does not provide sufficient support for a proper interior environment. The mechanical systems are at the end of their useful life due to construction materials and methods which left the thin (1\1/2\ inches) stone facade without adequate support and the museum without a proper heating and air conditioning system for the long-term. In 2009, our Committee had previously focused on the Air and Space Museum in a hearing called by then-Chairman Brady about issues of asbestos abatement and the maintenance of public safety during that process. Costs Significant structural deterioration of the building threatens public safety and the integrity of the priceless artifacts housed there, and has necessitated planning for a massive revitalization/renovation project. The revitalization will require use of Federal appropriated funds for exterior and structural repairs at the main museum building. The most-recent estimated cost presented to the Board of Regents on June 13, 2016, including removing and reinstalling collections where needed, would tentatively be $676,035,000, but could ultimately be significantly more expensive: $43 million through fiscal 2016; $5 million in FY 2017; $127 million in each of FY 2018 and 2019; $125 million in each of FY 2020 and 2021; and $124 million (est.) in FY 2022. This does not include additional amounts needed for construction of two new, smaller support buildings. Separate from the $676 million will be funding for construction of two storage facilities: at the Air and Space Museum's Udvar-Hazy building in Chantilly, and ``Pod 6'' at the Museum Support Center at the Suitland Collections Center in Suitland, Maryland. Funds to renovate the interior exhibition spaces in D.C. will be privately raised. This is the highest cost for a renovation in the history of the Institution and exceeds the total cost of construction for the newly opened Smithsonian National Museum of African- American History and Culture. But it must be appropriated and spent in a timely and cost-effective manner. The American people will quickly notice the absence of, or loss of access to, its most popular national museum. The Regents had even considered, but rejected, an option of tearing down the Museum and starting from scratch. The Smithsonian constantly engages in necessary maintenance throughout all of its facilities. What is unusual here is the size and expense of the project, the need to take drastic measures to protect the public and retain a functional museum, the need to either ``shelter in place'' or remove most of the building's collections, and the impact to the public in being potentially cut off from access to portions of one of the nation's foremost tourist attractions during four years of renovation. Keeping the Museum Open In light of the Air and Space Museum's status as a principal Washington destination, public interest in the progress of the revitalization will be substantial, since over a period estimated to be six or seven years the entire museum will be shut down and reopened incrementally to allow removal or protection-in-place of exhibits while renovation in each of seven ``zones'' of the Museum is occurring. There will be no access to areas of the Museum while they are undergoing renovation, but during this period the rest of the Museum will be open to the public. The Museum building has been divided into seven zones to ensure that some portions remain open at all times. The Smithsonian has erected a temporary covered walkway around vulnerable portions of the building, to remain in place until facade replacement is completed. The revitalization will replace the Museum's existing Tennessee Pink Marble facade with a similar but thicker stone (3 inches), improve blast and earthquake resistance, upgrade energy efficiency of the exterior envelope, replace mechanical systems and provide more secure access and egress. The method chosen for revitalization includes recladding the entire exterior of the museum, closing some areas completely for a period of time while moving artifacts, then reopening them and moving repairs to another sector. The Democratic Members of the Committee on House Administration want to ensure that the Museum revitalization will be cost-effective, structurally sound and safe, utilize the proper technologies to safely house its exhibits, and retain public access to the most-visited museum in the country to the greatest extent feasible while the work proceeds. In order to facilitate the renovation, which requires moving exhibits out of the D.C. site and relocating them for several years, legislation was introduced authorizing funding for the Dulles storage module expansion space at the Udvar-Hazy building and construction of new facilities at the Museum Support Center in Suitland (``Pod 6'') which would serve the Institution's broader needs in phasing out decaying facilities in Suitland and protecting the Institution's collections for the long-term. The Udvar-Hazy ``expansion space'' must be ready in time to receive collection items being removed from the D.C. building. A side-issue, not addressed directly in the legislation but representing a continuing problem for the Committee, is the Republican Leadership's destructive practice of applying ``cut- go'' principles to authorization bills, which would require reductions of funding in other projects prior to consideration of legislation in the House, to pay for the new construction costs. Authorization bills do not actually provide funding; they authorize subsequent appropriations. Yet the Republican leadership believes that cutting them as well could have an impact on overall spending levels. The effects of any such authorization cuts, if directed at the Smithsonian, would likely be substantial and disruptive. ``SELECT INVESTIGATIVE PANEL'' TO ATTACK WOMEN'S HEALTH This subunit of the Energy and Commerce Committee was created as a partisan witch hunt solely to smear Planned Parenthood with discredited allegations related to use of fetal tissue. The Ranking Member, Rep. Schakowsky, has branded it a ``pack of lies.'' The House Administration Committee's jurisdiction relates to its funding, which has been handled irregularly, to say the least. On October 7, 2015, the House passed House Resolution 461 and created the Select Investigative Panel to investigate inflammatory videos created by David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), anti-abortion activists who spent more than two years secretly recording Planned Parenthood and other reproductive health services. After Daleiden and CMP released deceptively edited video footage in July 2015, three Republican-led House committees immediately launched investigations into Planned Parenthood and others. Background Starting in July 2015, anti-abortion activists, through the Center for Medical Progress, began releasing footage alleging that Planned Parenthood clinics were selling tissue from aborted fetuses for profit. For example, a number of highly edited online videos showed a Planned Parenthood official in California discussing over lunch the price of providing fetal parts to a man and woman who are never shown on camera, but who are posing as buyers from a firm that procures tissue for medical researchers. Despite massive media coverage and a rush by Republicans to investigate, CMP's videos contain no evidence that Planned Parenthood has done anything illegal. A 1993 law states that clinics can't profit when women donate fetal tissue, and in the first video Planned Parenthood official Deborah Nucatola says repeatedly that the group does not. It is, however, standard practice for clinics to be compensated for staff time, resources, and transportation involved in providing tissue, which is what Planned Parenthood says Nucatola is seen discussing. These donations are crucial for ongoing medical research. Forensics analysts, mainstream media outlets and the creator of the videos himself, David Daleiden, have proven and confirmed that the smear campaign was highly edited. The five videos of Planned Parenthood staff have at least 42 splices where content is cut and edited to create the appearance of seamless conversation. In an interview with CNN, Daleiden not only conceded to editing the videos but also acknowledged that video and images he used have nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. As CMP continues to refuse to release the unedited source footage, experts have concluded that the clips cannot be authenticated. Despite the fact that none of these three Committees uncovered any evidence of wrongdoing by Planned Parenthood or other providers, the House Majority nonetheless created the select panel to mollify members who were threatening to shut down the government if Planned Parenthood were not defunded. Funding The resolution authorizing the Select Investigative Panel set no expiration date or budget for the Panel's work. It also placed no requirement on the Panel to establish an investigative plan or rules to govern its work and, despite repeated requests by the Panel's Democratic Members, Chairwoman Marsha Blackburn has refused to discuss or adopt rules or a plan. As a result, Panel Republicans have conducted a viciously partisan investigation that has excluded Democrats at every turn, and resulted in an abuse of congressional authority that has put health care providers, researchers, and their life- saving work at risk. The primary method for funding the Panel--through polls of the House Administration Committee--has allowed the Panel to operate without the transparency and accountability that the House committee funding process usually provides. For example, in November 2015, Republicans used a reserve fund created by the House's primary expense resolution funding committees for the 114th Congress to transfer $300,000 for use by the Select Panel through the end of that year. The Democratic Members of the Committee on House Administration opposed the transfer of funds as ``wasteful'' and ``unnecessary'' and called for a public meeting to ``ensure the opportunity for amendments and thorough debate.'' The request was not granted and the money was transferred for use by the Select Panel. On June 16, 2016, Republicans repeated this closed-door process to transfer an additional $490,000 to the Select Panel. The Democratic members of the Committee on House Administration requested a special meeting of the Committee to consider the Majority's proposal. The request was not granted and the money was transferred for use by the Select Panel without any public debate or accountability. To date, the Select Panel is on track to spend well over $1.5 million by the end of 2016, including up to $800,000 which the House voted to approve on December 1 (H. Res. 933) following a public markup in the Committee on House Administration and votes on the House floor which the Majority could no longer avoid. Use of ``Polls'' and lack of transparency Much of the funding for the Select Investigative Panel was accomplished using ``polls'' of Members of the House Administration Committee circulated by the Chairman, a practice which doesn't exist under the rules of the House and has no legal effect. But it has long been tolerated by our Committee members and chairmen of both parties as a convenience on minor, noncontroversial administrative matters requiring committee action, such as approval of committee consultant contracts. Members often did not wish to take the time to convene formally to consider such matters individually in the absence of a more substantial meeting agenda to act upon when there was no real disagreement, or where proposed actions are directives to personnel of the House subject to the Committee's control. These actions usually took the form of internal ``committee resolutions'' and were not reported to the House. However, the use of polling to fund the Select Investigative Panel went far beyond any previous practice as a matter of convenience, careening instead into conducting a controversial investigation which violated the rules of the House under a veil of secrecy. The House Rules and Manual (sec. 407-8, Jefferson's Manual) states clearly that Members of a committee ``. . . can only act when together, and not by separate consultation and consent-- nothing being the report of the committee but what has been agreed to in committee actually assembled'' and ``The House has adhered to the principle that a report must be authorized by a committee acting together, and a paper signed by a majority of the committee acting separately has been ruled out . . . . No measure or recommendation shall be reported from any committee unless a majority of the committee were actually present (clause 2 (b) of rule XI).'' By informal agreement, until the 113th Congress, any CHA member could object to any proposed poll, demand to enforce the rules of the House and assert their own rights to vote as representatives of their districts by requiring the Chairman to convene the Committee to consider these matters. However, in the 113th and 114th Congresses the rules and the former practice were disregarded when the chairman asserted the unilateral right to approve controversial internal committee resolutions by poll regardless of objection, and refused demands by Ranking Member Brady that the Committee meet and vote publicly. This was the procedure used to dispense money from the reserve fund to the Select Investigative Panel. Using this tactic, the Majority was able to avoid committee meetings, quorums, public votes, transcripts, press coverage and any other semblance of public accountability. The Committee also needs to insist upon its jurisdiction by requiring entities which operated outside the checks and balances of House rules and committee funding mechanisms, such as the now-defunct Benghazi Select Committee and any misbegotten successors, to appear before us to request funding directly, rather than allowing the leadership to hide funding in resolutions adopting House rules with no ceiling on ultimate expenditures. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE (GPO) March 4, 2016, marked the GPO's 155th anniversary and Congress needs the GPO today as much as ever to facilitate our legislative and oversight activities. The GPO constitutes the linchpin of Congress' efforts to keep America informed, and from our perspective, GPO employees are doing a great job under the leadership of Director Davita Vance-Cooks. Since our last activities report, the GPO has continued its work disseminating public information and guaranteeing its permanent preservation. For example, the GPO has replaced its former digital information platform, ``FDsys,'' with its latest generation system, ``govinfo,'' which provides greater access to public documents than ever before. The new, more robust system is easier to use and provides better service to researchers, students, federal employees and others. Along those lines, this year the GPO has worked with the Library of Congress to make legislative data available to users in bulk format. While this move did not generate banner headlines across the country, it expands the ability of interested parties to monitor congressional action. GPO is also working with the Library to digitize the bound Congressional Record back to 1873; it is already digitized and available back to 1981, with the 1970's scheduled for release in February 2017. Other historic documents will follow. In addition to its improving preservation and access work, GPO continues to deliver millions of dollars' worth of work ordered by its many federal-agency customers. Because GPO procures the majority of its printing through contracts with private-sector printers nationwide, it is working to modernize its print-procurement program and seeing results. For congressional work, GPO has installed new equipment that is reducing the cost of producing the hearing transcripts that we all use. GPO has been a key partner in the formal program to design and produce a new generation U.S. electronic passport for the U.S. Department of State. GPO has made significant capital investments in new and improved facilities, custom designed equipment, and digital manufacturing and quality control systems for this product known to millions of Americans and around the world. Since 2011, GPO has invested more than $100 million in the passport project and is prepared to begin delivering the new documents when the State Department directs. GPO continues to deliver security documents to the Department of Homeland Security and others. GPO is also working with other Legislative-branch agencies on key ways to improve information- technology performance and enhance cybersecurity. On the financial front, for fiscal years 2016 and 2017, Director Vance-Cooks sent Congress a flat budget request. She has reduced overhead costs in various ways, including through a voluntary buy-out, and thus lowered the budget requests for congressional printing. In addition, as the nature of printing has changed, GPO has managed to consolidate production within its North Capitol Street plant and accommodates other federal agencies in need of offices. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS The Committee continued to exercise its jurisdictional oversight of the Library of Congress, particularly with respect to the Copyright Office and the Library's continuing efforts to modernize its information technology infrastructure. We trust that the installation of the 14th Librarian of Congress, Dr. Carla Hayden, will hasten the pace of innovation at the Library of Congress and we look forward to working with Dr. Hayden and the Library's Chief Information Officer to improve the institution's IT systems, as recently recommended by the Government Accountability Office. Of particular interest to us is further improvement of the services provided by the Copyright Office, which needs a bold, forward-thinking, creative new Register to fill the vacancy there as soon as possible. Throughout the 114th Congress, and before, House Administration exercised vigorous oversight of the Copyright Office to ensure the office's leadership was making the necessary progress within the framework of the Library-wide IT modernization plan. We recognize the need for a modern and efficient Copyright Office given its important role to a large and varied group of stakeholders. We do not expect the abrupt resignation of former Register Maria Pallante to hinder any efforts of IT modernization and we will work with Acting Register of Copyrights Karyn Temple Claggett and the eventual permanent Register to ensure full implementation. We are delighted that the Congress managed to reauthorize the sound and film preservation programs at the Library of Congress and expanded the scope of the Books for the Blind Program to authorize distribution of reading devices to program clients in any format. Unfortunately, the Congress did not enact sundry proposals approved by this Committee to facilitate construction of long-planned storage modules at Fort Meade, Maryland, and expand opportunities for the Library to earn money and thus lessen its dependence on appropriations. We hope the Committee will resume its efforts to enact these and other reasonable proposals early in the 115th Congress. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER The Honorable Phil Kiko was sworn in as the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) on August 1, 2016. We are cautiously optimistic about the direction of the CAO's organization and are prepared to continue to work with the majority where we can share progress. We urge the CAO to focus on the following Democratic priorities. Cybersecurity We support dramatic and historic investments in our cybersecurity infrastructure, staffing, planning and support for Member offices. This is the CAO's top responsibility. We intend to hold the CAO accountable for the cybersecurity posture of the House of Representatives. District office operations The CAO needs to have deeper engagement with our more than 900 district offices. The general lack of understanding of district office operations is a persistent gap in our service delivery. The CAO should consider implementing a team to work directly on district office issues. Financial operations The investigation and indictment of former Representative Aaron Schock, a member of the Committee on House Administration, engendered a Member Expense Review led by Representatives Zoe Lofgren and Rodney Davis. The review resulted in substantial bipartisan changes and strengthening of the Voucher Document Standards and other Committee regulations designed to provide more accountability and transparency to the taxpayer. The minority supports the current finance office strategic planning process. We also urge the CAO to immediately and aggressively push House-wide adoption of the electronic voucher program. The program uses best business practices to process vouchers. An electronic voucher submission process is now standard in the executive branch and would be the best way for the House to expeditiously process financial matters and protect taxpayers. Training The CAO training program needs comprehensive reform. We look forward to working with the CAO, the majority, and the House Inspector General to implement changes to the program to meet the evolving business needs of the CAO and the congressional community. Shared employees The CAO must continue working with the Inspector General's office on recommendations to improve shared employees performance. The status quo is an enormous risk to the House. In addition to being inefficient, it is possible there are serious threats to our cybersecurity as a result of the shared employee arrangements. Potential merger of CAO and Architect of the Capitol (AOC) operations The Democrats asked the Inspector General (IG) to explore merging the blue collar operations of the CAO and AOC. The Democrats urge a serious discussion of the options once the final IG report is presented. Ongoing Oversight The minority appreciate the collaboration between the Committee Republican and Democratic staffs on the oversight of all of the House officers. This collaboration has resulted in direct improvement to the CAO's operation. Specifically, updating voucher document standards and Committee handbook regulations, improving district office connectivity and updating transition policies are among the highlights of this work. We look forward to continuing these collaborative efforts in the 115th Congress. HACKING THE PRESIDENCY During the 2016 election campaign, the principal American intelligence agencies announced that there had been significant activities, led by Russia, to attempt to influence and corrupt the results of our presidential election. President Obama, just before the end of the 114th Congress, promised to publicly release information in mid-January on the extent of these activities and what the American response would be. President- elect Donald Trump has refused to acknowledge either the Russian involvement or the seriousness of these incursions and has instead attacked the intelligence agencies. The integrity of our election system should be a major issue for the 115th Congress. If a Republican-led Congress can launch and fund ridiculous investigations of Benghazi and Planned Parenthood which spend millions and amount to nothing, it can finally start to do its job in defending our country against one of the most insidious attacks it had ever faced. ELECTION ACTIVITIES On July 14th, House Administration Ranking Member Robert A, Brady introduced H.R. 5799, a bill to automatically register willing eligible voters for federal elections. Our current registration systems are aging and an in desperate need of modernization. Notably, two states' registration systems-- Arizona and Illinois--were the target of foreign cyber intrusions while the threat and possibility of foreign interference with our election was ever-present in 2016. In addition to bolstering the security and privacy and voter registration records, H.R. 5779 ensures that no eligible voter that wants to participate in their democracy will be denied that opportunity due to arbitrary and restrictive voting laws. Registering to vote should easy, efficient, and secure and H.R. 5799 would accomplish these aims. For each federal election, the House Administration Committee trains House employees who have volunteered to serve as election observers. If requested by a campaign, the Committee sends out bipartisan teams of observers to monitor vote canvassing surrounding close. Congressional races in the event that a race ends up before the Committee as an election contest The Committee received three requests for election observers, each from the Republican challenger in the district. We sent observers to the following districts: California's 7th Congressional District, California's 10th Congressional District, and California's 49th Congressional District. The House did not ultimately receive a formal notice of election contest from any of the unsuccessful candidates in these districts. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION House Administration Democrats still support the mission of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and believe in its usefulness and effectiveness in carrying out this mission. The majority tried again in the 114th Congress, and again failed, to abolish the EAC. But we expect them to try again. In 2016, the EAC dedicated itself to helping election administrators and officials prepare for the 2016 general election. There are more than 8,000 independently operating election jurisdictions in the country. So, helping administrators prepare is a large undertaking. The EAC acts as a clearinghouse and facilitator between states. In 2016, the EAC produced 22 instructional and facilitative videos, nearly 100 blog posts, held 10 public meetings, summits, and round tables, and testified before Congress. In addition to helping the more than 8,000 election jurisdictions prepare for the general election, the EAC also furthered its other primary objectives of testing and certifying voting machine--certifying five machines--and conducted the federally mandated Election Administration Voting Survey. Operating with a quorum of Commissioners, the EAC has demonstrated its usefulness to local and state election officials, among whom it enjoys broad support. We look forward to equipping the EAC with the resources and support necessary to make it even stronger. House Administration Democratic Forum on Military Voting On May 6, 2016, the Democratic Members of the Committee on House Administration conducted a public forum on issues relating to military voting, in San Diego County, California, with Rep. Juan Vargas presiding. The meeting was an open dialogue where top government officials and military voting experts provided attendees with information on the state of military voting and provided best methods for protecting the rights of service members. All Members of the Committee on House Administration were invited to attend. Attending the forum was Rep. Vargas, Matt Boehmer, Director of the Federal Voting Assistance Program, and Michael Vu, Registrar of Voters, County of San Diego. We discussed how Congress can do more to ensure that no valid ballot goes uncounted from active duty service members abroad. Registrar Vu spoke about the challenges service members face abroad and the tools that the Election Assistance Commission provides local governments. Director Boehmer discussed the pilot projects underway and his efforts to reach out to all active duty service members abroad. Additionally, our panelists discussed issues regarding the military postal infrastructure, the various voting rights per each individual states, the security of the internet for overseas voting and the effectiveness the MOVE Act. Recommends also included (1) establishing partnerships between state and local election officials and local military installations; (2) that all Federal Post Card Applications be treated as a permanent voter registration form; and (3) providing user-friendly information on what is on the ballot and when the ballot applications has been accepted. Participants, including local members of the Armed Services, interacted with the panelists with their questions and insights into how to improve military and overseas voting. As the Republican Congress have failed to address key issues, such as a lack of accessibility to the ballot, we have spearheaded efforts to get feedback from the community on potential improvements. The right to vote is the bedrock of a democratic process and it is imperative to foster this right. Participating in the political process while deployed abroad presents an entirely new set of challenges, often times preventable. A transcript of the Forum follows: [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Robert A. Brady, Ranking Member. Zoe Lofgren, Member. Juan Vargas, Member. [all]