[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
N 1'.) I N L, S 111 options for Minimizing Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Spill Response NATIONAL -OCEANIC C@7- ATM-0-SPHERIC ADMINISTRATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RE ONSE (Z,'- ASSESSMENT DIVISION TD424. 3 .0684 1994 AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE SEPTEMBER1994 Options for Minimizing Environmental impacts of Freshwater Spill Response Vroperty of CSC Library US Department Of Commerce NOAA r--, .-., --r-7@CCO Center Library 223d Avenue Charleston, SC 29405-2413 NATIONAL OCEANIC e-- ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE C-:-, ASSESSMENT DIVISION AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE SEPTEMBER 1994 CONTENTS PAGE Abstract ......................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments ..................................................................... vii 1.0 introduction .....................................................................................I 1.1 Scope and Purpose ................................................................1 1.2 Background .............................................................................2 1.3 organization of Guidelines ......................................................3 1.4 Sensitivity of Environments and Habitats ................................4 i.s impact of Response methods in the Absence of oil ...............5 1.6 Classification of Oil Response methods ...................................7 1.7 Assumptions Used in the Discussion of Methods ...................7 1.8 Classification of Oil Types .......................................................9 2.0 Summary of Response methods and Habitats ......................... 13 3.0 Spill Response Methods for Specific inland Habitats ............... 23 3.1 introduction ........................................................................... 23 3.2 Open water ........................................................................... 24 Habitat Description ................I .......................................... 24 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 24 Response methods .......................................................... 26 3.3 Large Rivers .......................................................................... 28 Habitat Description ........................................................... 28 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 28 Response Methods .......................................................... 31 3.4 Small Lakes and Ponds ......................................................... 34 Habitat Description ........................................................... 34 Sensitivity ...........................................................................4 Response Methods .......................................................... 37 3.5 Small Rivers and Streams ..................................................... 40 Habitat Description ........................................................... 40 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 4,0 Response Methods .......................................................... 43 contents, cont . ...................................................................... PAGE 3.6 Bedrock Habitats ..................................................................... 16 Habitat Description .......................................................... 46 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 46 Response methods .......................................................... 49 3.7 Manmade Structures ............................................................. 52 Habitat Description .......................................................... 52 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 52 Response methods ............................................................ 55 3.8 Sand Habitats ......................................................................... 58 Habitat Description .......................................................... 58 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 58 Response Methods .......................................................... 61 3.9 mixed Sand and Gravel Habitats ........................................... 64 Habitat Description .......................................................... 64 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 64 Response Methods .......................................................... 67 3. 10 Gravel Habitats ..................................................................... 70 Habitat Description .......................................................... 70 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 70 Response methods .......................................................... 73 3.11 vegetated Shoreline Habitats ................................................ 76 Habitat Description ... ...................................................... 76 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 76 Response Methods .............. ........................................... 79 3.12 Mud Habitats ......................................................................... 82 Habitat Description .......................................................... 82 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 82 Response Methods .......................................................... 85 3.13 Wetland Habitats ................................................................... @m Habitat Description .......................................................... 88 Sensitivity ........................................................................ 88 Response Methods .......................................................... 91 Contents, cont ....................................................................... PAGE 4.0 Spill Response Methods .............................................................. 95 Physical Response Methods ...................................................... 95 1 Natural Recovery ................................................................ 96 2 Booming ..................................................... I ....................... 97 3 Skimming ........................................................................... 98 4 Barriers/Berms .................................................................... 98 5 Physical Herding ................................................................. 99 6 manual Oil ReMoVal/Cleaning ........................................... I oo 7 Mechanical Oil Removal ................................................... 101 8 Sorbents ........................................................................... 102 9 Vacuum ............................................................................ 102 10 Debris Removal ............................................................... 103 1 1 Sediment Reworking ........................................................ 104 12 vegetation Removal ......................................................... 105 13 In-Situ Burning .................................................................. 105 14 Flooding ........................................................................... 106 15 Low-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing .................................. 107 16 High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing .................................. jo8 17 Low-Pressure, HOt-Water Flushing .................................... log 18 High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing ................................... 110 19 Steam Cleaning ................................................................ 11, 20 Sand Blasting .................................................................... III Chemical Response methods 21 Dispersants ...................................................................... 112 22 Emulsion-Treating Agents ................................................ 113 23 Visco-Elastic Agents .... I.................................................... 114 24 Herding Agents ................................................................ 115 25 Solidiflers 115 26 Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment ..................................... 116 27 Shoreline Cleaning Agents ................................................ 117 Contents, cont . ..................................................................... PAGE Biological Response methods 28 Nutrient Enrichment ......................................................... 118 29 Natural microbe Seeding .................................................. 119 5.o Special Considerations .............................................................. 121 5.1 Public Health Concerns ....................................................... 121 5.2 Conditions Under Which Oil Might Sink in Fresh Water ....... 122 5.3 oil Behavior in Ice Conditions .............................................. 123 5.4 Permafrost .......................................................................... 124 5.5 Firefighting Foam ............................................................... 125 Appendices A Oil Spill Response Technology Bibliography ....................... A- I B Grain-size Scale .................................................................... B-1 TABLES PAGE I Primary freshwater environments and habitats Included in t his guide ... ........................................................................................... 3 2 Correlation of the shoreline habitats discussed in this guide with t he Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) shoreline rankings for the Great Lakes .................................................................................... 4 3 Relative impact of response methods In the absence of oil .................6 4 The four types of oil used in this guide and their characteristics ........ 11 5 Key to ESI codes ................................................................................ 14 6 Gasoline Products: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in water environments .................. 15 7 Gasoline Products: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in shoreline habitats ...................... 16 8 Diesel-like oils: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills In water environments .......................... 17 9 Diesel-like oils: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in shoreline habitats .............................. 18 10 Medium Oils: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in water environments .......................... 19 I I Medium Oils: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in shoreline habitats .............................. 20 12 Heavy Oils: Summary of relative environmental impact from r esponse methods for spills in water environments ........................... 21 13 Heavy oils: Summary of relative environmental Impact from response methods for spills in shoreline habitats .............................. 22 14 Relative environmental Impact from response methods for open water environments .................................................................. 25 15 Relative environmental impact from response methods for large river environments ............................................................................. 30 16 Relative environmental Impact from response methods for small lake and pond environments ............................................................. 36 TABLES, cont. PAGE 17 Relative environmental impact from response methods for sniall river and stream environments ................................................. 42 18 Relative environmental impact from response methods for bedrock habitats ................................................................................. 48 19 Relative environmental impact from response methods for manmade structures .......................................................................... 54 20 Relative environmental impact from response methods for sand habitats ............................................................................................... 60 21 Relative environmental impact from response methods for mixed sand and gravel habitats ..................................................................... 66 22 Relative environmental impact from response methods for gravel habitats ............................................................................................... 72 23 Relative environmental impact from response methods for vegetated shoreline habitats ............................................................... 78 24 Relative environmental impact from response methods for mud habitats ............................................................................................... 84 25 Relative environmental impact from response methods for wetland habitats ................................................................................. 90 Vi ABSTRACT Selecting appropriate protection, response, and cleanup techniques, both before and following an oil spill, affects the ultimate environmental impact and cost resulting from a spill. The American Petroleum Institute (API) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) jointly developed this guide as a tool for contingency planners and field responders to identify response techniques that have minimal ecological impacts and also minimize the impact of the oil. The guide provides information on 29 response methods and classifies their relative environmental impact for combinations of four oil types and twelve freshwater environments and habitats. Spill topics of special concern in freshwater settings are also discussed, including public health, conditions under which oil might sink in freshwater, oil behavior in ice conditions, permafrost, and use of firefighting foams. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS API's Wand Spills Work Group began this project in 1991 with the Workshop on the Environmental Effects of Response Technologies for Inland Waters that was jointly sponsored by the Spill Control Association of America. Initial technical support was provided by Woodward Clyde Consultants whose team was led by Dr. Edward Owens. Completion of this document was made possible by financial and technical support from the NOAA Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment Division (HAZMAT) and their contract, Dr. Jacqueline Michel of Research Planning, Inc. This document has been reviewed by spill response professionals, including contractors, industry, consultants, and government whose efforts are appreciated. API and NOAA wish to acknowledge the additional contributions made by David Bell (BP America) and Dr. Ron Goodman (Imperial Oil Resources, Ltd.). The successful completion of this project is due in large part to the energy, leadership, and perseverance of David Fritz (Amoco Oil), Lt Kenneth Barton (NOAA), Jay Rodstein (formerly of NOAA), and Alexis Steen (API). Vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1. 1 SCOPE AND PURPOSE Selecting appropriate oil spill protection, recovery, and cleanup techniques, before and following an oil spill, is a critical element affecting the ultimate environmental impact and cost resulting from a spill. It is important to identify techniques that in themselves have minimal intrinsic ecological impact and are also effective in reducing the impact of the oil. Furthermore, these response techniques should be considered before a spill, so that little time needs to be spent preparing for the response during a spill. 'The American Petroleum Institute (API) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) jointly developed this guide as a too] to help contingency planners and field responders evaluate response techniques and choose those that will most effectively prevent or minimize adverse ecological impact. Information is provided to help select response techniques for specific combinations of habitat and oil types. Each technique is evaluated individually for a specific habitat; however, during spill response more than one technique may be used at the same time on one or more habitats. The discussions in this guide reflect primarily the assessment of the environmental impac of the response methods. This guide also recognized that the selected techniques should be effective. They must remove a significant amount of oil from the environment or prevent or reduce oil impact, and they must have acceptable impact on the habitat as compared to leaving the oil alone (natural recovery). Prolonged use of an inefficient technique may be more ecologically detrimental than short-term use of a potentially more intrusive approach (e.g., frequent entry into a marsh to replace sorbents rather than vacuuming pooled oil). Reducing the overall ecological impact of a spill event is the primary concern of this guide, and it is applicable for inland, freshwater environments and habitats only. This guide does not address land-only, chemical, or marine spills. It also does not discuss legal or regulatory issues; safety considerations; or guidance on planning, organizing, and conducting a spill response effort. The manual may be customized for specific geographic areas to address special priorities and concerns. Specific spill conditions will often dictate the response techniques used, and selection always involves tradeoffs. For example, a potentially ecologically damaging, but efficient, cleanup technique could be used to meet site-specific response goals. Also, techniques may be used early in response simply because they can be implemented immediately, rather than waiting until ones with lower impact can be mobilized. A method that has a significant short-term ecological impact, such as in-situ burning, may actually produce the lowest long-term ecological impact because it removes the oil quickly. 1.2 BACKGROUND Oil spills into inland waters differ from coastal or marine spills from several perspectives. For instance, inland spills are usually in freshwater habitats. Inland spills are also more frequent than marine spills, and they often involve smaller volumes of oil. Refined product spills are more common in freshwater, while crude oil spills comprise the majority of marine spills. Inland spills have a much higher potential to contaminate water supplies (surface as well as groundwater), to affect areas of concentrated populations, and to impact manmade structures and human activities. In coastal and marine environments, wave and tidal action are important mechanisms for dispersion and transport of oil and in removing oil from shorelines. These mechanisms are less important in freshwater habitats, where currents and floods are more important factors. The knowledge base for response to oil spills reflects the disparity of information available between marine spill response and freshwater response. The lack of literature and guidelines for inland spill response prompted several efforts to improve this shortcoming. Preparation of this guide began with a workshop sponsored by API on Inland Oil Spills, conducted in Dearborn, Michigan, November 19-21, 1991. The objective of the workshop was to bring together the oil spill response community experienced and/or responsible for responding to freshwater crude oil or petroleum product spills, and to develop strategies through consensus for dealing with spills in different freshwater environments and shoreline habitats. The information from that workshop was the basis for development of this guide. However, the final guidelines presented here are based on the educated and experienced opinions of oil spill experts in industry and government. 2 1.3 ORGANIZATION OF GUIDELINES The guide identifies response methods for twelve primary freshwater habitats (Table 1), which represent various waterways and shoreline types. Each habitat is treated separately in the guide, although the spill responder will be confronted with a variety of habitats. Table 1. Primary freshwater environments and habitats included in this guide. Water Environments Shoreline Habitats Open Water Bedrock Large Rivers Manmade Structures Small Lakes and Ponds Sand Small Rivers and Streams Mixed Sand and Gravel Gravel Vegetated Shorelines Mud Wetlands Section 2 of the guide includes: Response method summary matrices for the four primary water environments and eight shoreline habitats for four general oil types. Section 3, arranged by water environment and shoreline habitat, contains: � A detailed description of the environment or habitat; and � Matrices of response methods in terms of recommended use for each of the four general oil types. Section 4 of the guide contains detailed descriptions of the response methods listed in the matrices. The following headings are used: � Objective; � Description; � Applicable habitats; � When to use; � Biological constraints; and � Environmental impact. Section 5 discusses the following special issues of concern in freshwater settings: � Public health concerns; � Conditions under which oil might sink; � Oil behavior under ice conditions; � Oil behavior and response in permafrost habitats; and � Firefighting foam. 3 1.4 SENSITIVITY OF ENVIRONMENTS AND HABITATS Habitat sensitivity is a function of several factors, including degree of exposure to natural removal processes, biological productivity and ability to recover following oil exposure, human use of the habitat, and ease of oil removal. These factors are used to rank the overall sensitivity of shoreline habitats to spilled oil as part of the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI). This guide focuses on one element of environmental sensitivity, namely the sensitivity of habitats to impacts resulting from oil removal. ESI shorelines are grouped according to the oil removal considerations used in this guide. The correlation between the shoreline habitat groupings in this guide and the shoreline rankings in the ESI atlases published for the U.S. Great Lakesis shown in Table 2, the summary tables, and Chapter 3. It should be noted that some groupings include both low and high sensitivity habitats, particularly where both sheltered and exposed habitats are grouped, such as bedrock and manmade structures. Table 2. Correlation of the shoreline habitats discussed in this guide with the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) shoreline rankings for the Great Lakes. Shoreline Habitats ESI Ranking and Description Bedrock ESI = 1A Exposed Rocky Cliffs ES1 = 2 Shelving Bedrock Shores ESI = 8A Sheltered Rocky Shores Manmade Structures ESI = 1B Exposed Solid Seawalls ES1 = 6B Riprap Structures ESI = 8B Sheltered Solid Manmade Structures Sand ES1 = 4 Sand Beaches Mixed Sand and Gravel ESI = 3 Eroding Scarps in Unconsolidated Sediment ESI = 5 Mixed Sand and Gravel Beaches Gravel ESI = 6A Gravel Beaches Vegetated Shorelines ESI = 9A Sheltered Low Vegetated Banks/Bluffs Mud ESI = 9B Sheltered Sand/Mud Flats Wetlands ESI = 10A Fringing Marshes ESI = 10B Extensive Marshes 4 The differences in oil behavior, persistence, and need for cleanup between sheltered and exposed sites are addressed in the discussion of these habitats. Sensitivity issues of special concern to inland areas include strong seasonal variations in biological productivity and exposure to physical processes, urban areas with extensive manmade structures along the shoreline, and populated areas that are very near shorelines and bodies of water when human-health concerns can dominate cleanup issues. Important seasonal considerations include presence of ice in winter; variations in water level, which greatly influence habitats likely to be exposed to oil, flooding of stranded oil, and natural removal rates; sensitivity of vegetation to direct oiling impact; and use of habitats by migratory birds. 1.5 IMPACT OF RESPONSE METHODS IN THE ABSENCE OF OIL The following criteria were used to evaluate the relative impact of each technique in the absence of oil, primarily due to physical disturbances of mechanical methods and toxic impacts from chemical and biological methods. The results are shown in Table 3. Impacts from use of individual products and equipment types vary. The information provided to evaluate impacts in the absence of oil addresses generic characteristics of the response techniques and does not consider those variations. Additional information on environmental impacts is provided in the discussions of each technique in Section 4. � Low Physical damage to the substrate and vegetation is minimal. Toxic impact is likely to be of limited areal extent and short duration. Restabilization or repopulation of the habitat is likely within six months. � ModeratePhysical damage to the substrate and vegetation may occur, with increased erosion potential in sedimentary habitats. Toxic impact is such that restabilization or repopulation of the habitat may take six to twelve months. � High Physical damage to the substrate and vegetation is expected. Erosion potential may be high for the technique. The ecosystem may be adversely affected. Restabilization or repopulation of the habitat may take more than twelve months. Those techniques that are clearly ineffective or inapplicable for a habitat are indicated with a dash (-)..For cases where there is insufficient information to evaluate impact in the absence of oil, an "I" is used. 5 Table 3. Relative impact of response methods in the absence of oil. WATER ENVIRONMENT SHORELINE HABITAT Response Open small 'Large Small Man- Vegetated Sandond Method Water LakeslPonds Rivers RiverslStrearns Bedrock Made Sand Shores Grovel Grovel Mud Wetlands PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHODS Booming L L L L Mum Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning L H L M L L L H M H H Sorbents L L L L L L L L L M M Debris Removal L L L L L L L L L M M Vegetation Removal L H M H H H Flooding L L L L M L L L K-@:Zn n`7X:,-:.,:.,, M@ High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing L L H H H H H H High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing M L H H H H H H .... . ........ . . . . .. ..... ....... . V 5 _7 9@ M0 [email protected] aw 1"', 8:1 RENOWN MEN Sand Blasting H M Dispersants L H L H Visco-Elastic Agents L M L L Solidifiers L L L L L L M M M L M M Shoreline Cleaners M L M I M M M I . . ... . . . . . a Nutrient Enrichment L M L L L L L L L L L L L = Low; M = Moderate; H High; I Incomplete Information; Not applicable for this environment or habitat. 1.6 CLASSIFICATION OF OIL RESPONSE METHODS The classifications developed for this guide compare the relative environmental impact of specific response methods for a given environment or habitat and oil type. It should be noted that the methods were compared among themselves, and no one method was used as a standard. The relative effectiveness of a response technique's ability to protect a habitat or remove oil is not explicitly considered. Relative effectiveness is only incorporated into the classification where less effective methods could result in longer application and thus greater ecological impacts, or leave higher oil residues in the habitat. The classification categories are defined as follows: A May cause the least adverse habitat impact B May cause some adverse habitat impact * May cause significant adverse habitat impact * May cause the most adverse habitat impact I Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time Those techniques that are clearly ineffective (e.g., herding agents on heavy oils) or inapplicable for an oil type or habitat (e.g., sand blasting of mud habitats) are indicated with a dash (-). 1.7 ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE DISCUSSION OF METHODS This guide was prepared with several assumptions: Proper Applieation of Metbods It is assumed that methods will be properly applied by trained personnel. For example, if booms are recommended, these guidelines assume that the booms will be effectively located and correctly deployed. Improper application of almost any technique can render it ineffective or cause additional damage. For general guidance on application, see the publications listed in Appendix A. In cases where instruction for using a protection or cleanup method may be habitat- specific, see Section 4. 7 Evaluation of Relative Imp"t of Methods Each method was evaluated independently for each habitat. In an actual response, however, the methods cannot be evaluated in isolation from each other. Specific spill conditions will often dictate the need for different techniques for the same water environment or shoreline habitat. For example, a high degree of oiling or low exposure to natural removal processes may require a more intrusive technique to accelerate recovery in specific areas. The sensitivity of adjacent habitats may lead to the decision not to use an appropriate method because of the likelihood of secondary impact caused by cleanup of nearby sites. Finally, from an operational perspective, it may be necessary to use available methods early during a spill, rather than waiting for equipment or materials to arrive or teams to be trained in use of a less damaging technique. Relative Effeetiveness of Methods The relative effectiveness of response methods to protect habitats and remove oil is a key consideration when selecting from various response methods. Although this guide attempts to consider only the environmental impact, effectiveness was incorporated into the discussion of methods in three ways. First, those methods thought to be totally ineffective or inapplicable for an environment or habitat were not even listed in the habitat-specific matrices. For example, barrier/berms are not listed on the open-water matrices, and mechanical removal is not listed on the bedrock matrices. Second, those methods that were clearly ineffective or inapplicable for a specific oil type within a habitat matrix were designated with a dash (-). Examples include using solidifiers on heavy oils in open water and emulsion-treating agents on gasoline products. Third, those methods that are feasible, but likely to leave a significant amount of oil at the end of treatment, are given a lower classification. Often this change in effectiveness is associated with oil type, e.g., low-pressure, cold-water flushing is given a lower classification for heavy oil than medium oil because of its lower efficiency at oil removal. Similarly, methods such as manual and mechanical oil removal and sediment reworking that would have little effect on gasoline, which tends to evaporate quickly, are given lower classifications because the impact of the methods are not balanced by benefits from removing the oil. 8 Restrictions for Using Response Methods Restrictions related to safety, weather, spill size, or regulatory constraints cover a wide spectrum of scenarios. It is thus impractical to discuss every possible situation or combination of factors in a set of guidelines. Some of this information, if appropriate, is included in the discussion under each habitat (Section 3) or in the descriptions of each method (Section 4). Many other considerations can come into play, such as worker safety and aesthetic, social, and economic impacts. Specific safety issues dealing with responding to gasoline spills are reflected in the tables. It should be noted that using chemical methods will require approvals from state and/or Federal regulatory agencies. 1.8 CLASSIFICATION OF OIL TYPES Inland oil spills can involve a wide range of crude oils and refined products. The type of oil spilled is a key consideration in developing response and cleanup strategies. Oil properties important in characterizing oil types include: Flash point Highly volatile oils, which evaporate rapidly after a release, may pose significant fire risks to responders. Often, the safest option is to allow the product to evaporate. Evaporation is an important mechanism for removing the spill from the water or shore because it lessens the need for cleanup and concern for associated impacts. Highly volatile oils completely evaporate in one to two days. Specijle gravitylAPI gravity Oils with a specific gravity greater than 1.00 (API gravity of less than 10) will sink in freshwater. However, those with a specific gravity of 0.95 or higher (API gravity less than 17.5) are also at risk of sinking once they become mixed with suspended sediments. When these oils have stranded on a shoreline, sediment incorporated from the shoreline can cause sinking if it is eroded from the shoreline. Viscosity Viscosity controls both the rate that oil spreads on water and its likely depth of penetration into the substrate once on shore. Low-viscosity oils spread rapidly into thin sheens, increasing the surface area and making recovery difficult. They readily penetrate into sediments and debris. Viscous oils can be so thick that they do not spread, particularly when spilled on cold water. They are more likely to coat rather than penetrate shorelines. 9 Emulsion formation Under certain conditions, oil slicks will form a water-in - oil emulsion often called "chocolate mousse." This material can contain up to 80 percent water and can be many orders of magnitude more viscous than the spilled oil. There is no simple qualitative measure of the tendency to form emulsions. Emulsions are stabilized by natural or added surfactants, or compounds that act like surfactants, in the spilled oil. Gasoline does not emulsify, while diesel can quickly emulsify. Many crude oils can form stable emulsions. When an emulsion is formed, the oil changes in appearance and viscosity, becoming much more difficult to address from a spill-response perspective: the fluid is more viscous and hard to pump, and the volume has increased by a factor of four to five. Adhesion The ease with which spilled oil can be physically removed from surfaces, usually by water flushing or vacuum, is an important factor in planning cleanup operations. The range of response methods needed for shoreline cleanup will depend largely on whether stranded oil adheres to substrate and response equipment. However, adhesion is a poorly defined parameter that is difficult to predict. We use an oil classification scheme based on these properties to define four categories of oil. Characteristics of the four general types are provided below (Table 4), along with representative oils. Weathering tends to change the physical and chemical properties of oil, usually making it more viscous and cleanup techniques less effective. Methods used during the initial response should be re-evaluated as time elapses and as the oil changes in character. To some extent, this re-evaluation may be achieved by using the four tables for oil types in sequence, thus simulating the weathering process. Extremely heavy oils or those that are solid at ambient temperatures, such as asphalt, are not addressed below but are discussed as a special consideration in Section 5. 10 Table 4. The four types of oil used in this guide and their characteristics. Gasoline Products Very volatile and highly flammable (flash point near 100OF/400C) 0 High evaporation rates 0 Narrow cut fraction with no residues 0 Low viscosity; spread rapidly to a thin sheen 0 Specific gravity less than 0.80 0 High acute toxicity to biota 0 Do not emulsify 0 Will penetrate substrate; nonadhesive Diesel-like Products and Light Crude Oils (No. 2 fuel oil, jet fuels, kerosene, West Texas crude, Alberta crude) 0 Moderately volatile (flash point varies 100-150OF/40-650C) 0 Refined products can evaporate to no residue 0 Crude oils do have a residue after evaporation is completed 0 Low- to moderate viscosity; spread rapidly into thin slicks 0 Specific gravity of 0.80-0.85; API gravity of 35-45 0 Moderate to high acute toxicity to biota; product-specific toxicity related to type and concentration of aromatic compounds 0 Can form stable emulsions 0 Tend to penetrate substrate; fresh spills are not adhesive Stranded light crudes tend to smother organisms Medium-grade Crude Oils and Intermediate Products (North Slope crude, South Louisiana crude, No. 4 fuel oil, IFO 180, lube oils) 0 Moderately volatile (flash point higher than 1250F/500C) 0 Up to one-third will evaporate in the first 24 hours Moderate to high viscosity 0 Specific gravity of 0.85-0.95; API gravity of 17.5-35 0 Variable acute toxicity, depending on amount of light fraction 0 Can form stable emulsions 0 Variable substrate penetration and adhesion 0 Stranded oil tends to smother organisms Heavy Crude Oils and Residual Products (Venezuela crude, San Joaquin Valley crude, Bunker C' No. 6 fuel oil) 0 Slightly volatile (flash point greater than 150OF/650C) 0 Very little product loss by evaporation 0 Very viscous to semisolid; may become less viscous when warmed 0 Specific gravity of 0.95-1.00; AN gravity of 10-17.5 0 Low acute toxicity relative to other oil types 0 Can form stable emulsions 0 Little penetration of substrate likely, but can be highly adhesive 0 Stranded oil tends to smother organisms 2.0 SUMMARY OF RESPONSE METHODS AND HABITATS Tables 6 through 13 provide overviews of the physical, chemical, and biological response methods for four different oil types as applied to all water environments and shoreline habitats. Detailed information regarding specific habitats is provided in Section 3. Users of this guide should consult the matrices and summaries in Section 3 for descriptions of assumptions and circumstances applicable to the various methods. We encourage you to refer to Section 4 for more information on each response method. Also, the references listed in Appendix A can provide valuable, detailed information on specific topics or applications. It is important to note that the classifications primarily reflect the likely relative environmental impact resulting from properly implementing a response method within each habitat. However, when there are overriding effectiveness or safety issues associated with a specific oil type or habitat, these methods have been classified as "not applicable" and are denoted with a dash (-) on the matrices. In the case of response to gasoline-type spills, many methods have been classified as "not applicable" because of the fire hazard to the responders. Although responders have used many of these methods at gasoline spills to protect resources or clean up the spill, discussion of the spill-specific circumstances that made their use possible are beyond the scope of this document. Natural recovery is included in the tables since natural processes can be adequate, on their own, to remediate impact from an oil spill. It also presents no added environ- mental stress due to human spill response activities. Therefore, natural recovery is often classified as having the least adverse habitat impact in the summary tables. Since there is little information regarding the environmental impact of in-situ burning, chemical treatment, and biodegradation enhancement in freshwater habitats, the evaluation and discussion are based on the best available knowledge on how they work and any past use. In most cases this knowledge results from past experience with marine spills. Where there is too little information to evaluate a technique (e.g., chemical shoreline pretreatment), an "I", for insufficient information, is used in the tables. Spill response techniques described in this guide for inland water habitats include protection, recovery, and cleanup methods. The main objective of protection is keeping oil out of a habitat, or reducing the amount of oil that enters. Recovery consists of removal of floating oil from the water surface. Cleanup consists of removal of stranded oil. Frequently, these methods may be used for several response phases, such as 13 deploying boom for protection or for containing oil washed off a river bank during cleanup. Table 5. Key to ESI codes used in Tables 7, 9, 11, and 13. ESI No. Shoreline pe 1B Exposed solid seawalls 3 Eroding scarps in unconsolidated sediments 5 Mixed sand and gravel beaches 6B Rim structures 8A Sheltered rocky shores 9A Sheltered vegetated low banks/bluffs 10A Freshwater marshes (herbaceous vegetation) 14 Table 6. GASOLINE PRODUCTS: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in water environments. WATER ENVIRONMENT Response Open Large Smo// Sma// Method Water Rivers LakeslPonds RiverslStreams PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHODS A ........... . X@ A A, Booming - Containment ........... A P-WEX Mi'M d1b, A N: nn@ ........ ... .. .. . ..... Skimming A Physical Herding B B C B 'x . ...... . .. @Itr tent. Mechanical Oil Removal so rbenb Vacuum Juh fls.@ bib R Oval Sediment Reworking 10 In-Situ Burning B C .. ........ Low-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing ... ..... ... ... ....... . ..... . . . Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing t 0W F1 h' Steam Cleaning 41181 W CHEMICAL RESPONSE METHODS .................... ......... ... ...... .. ..... ..... . V J n Emulsion Treating Agents "Scoke a A Herding Agents D D B D D Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE METHODS u r en rich 'i t M. Natural Microbe Seeding Th f, it 'M t@rva lve@e I :1 . 1,te It$', t hy toninentallimpad of e-4ch tes Ow'In' @16. 'p for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: caulst'%.%tht'] 4WOM01-Aw 4 1M .... ............... .... ,::A, R%'M a...d h'bt t Patt yo@ ........ .. B May cause some adverse habitat impact. zri ... M D May cause the most adverse habitat impact. . .......... .. . till A-10 nso penfl Am 4, _0 W t t' v me, _f t t dd b h AMC, iyena_ c.:me Ad ye Not applicable for this oil type. Table 7. GASOLINE PRODUCTS: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in shoreline habitats. SHORELINE HABITAT Response Man- Vegetated Sandand Method Bedrock Mode Sand Shores Gravel Gravel Mud Wetlands PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHODS 1,2,8- 1,8 3,4 9 5 6 7.9 10 . .... . . Booming M ..... ....... Barriers/Berms . .......... ... . .... .. . . .... . . .. . .. 4,,,.@[email protected]@.,,,.',.,,.,..@.@@,..@ ...... ........ .. . . . . . . n........ . . .. . . . . ..... ... . . . . .. . . . Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning D D D D D D ... . ............ . . .. . . ...... @0 . .. . . . .... ...... . . . . .. . .... ly .. ....... ............. . . . ... . .. ..... N@t ... .......... . . ... ...... .. ...... ......... . ........ ............ .. ............ .. .................. Sorbents B B B C . .. .. . . . ... ... .. .. ... acqu M Debris Removal . ........ _g NO' 5@ in 60 kf Vegetation Removal D D ............ .... . . .... ------ .... . . .. ..... @umin . ............ Flooding B B B B A A B B .... .. . ........ . ..... .... .. ... COW xO--@ q*W9 @xwuh' aer., ... ............. ........... High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing B B D D C C D D ...... .... U I P H w f", U%,,," t;vuw V. . . .. .-, ... . . .. High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D D D D D D eamb Sand Blasting X@ WIRMAMW CHEM CALIRESMgt . ..... .... Dispersants Viisco-Elastic Agents ......... . .... . . . . .. . . . ... .......... . M" 1@ Solidifiers B D D . ..... .. 6 a0me Shoreline Cleaning Agents w_,- -,---.,.-, - @@-,,X,K@,,.::@@. I - . @ @@ I@ 1.11, 11 .11 .. ", . ,- @ --e-,-,., . .. . ... . . . .. ... .. . .. ..... . .. .. .... . .. .. '155 .. .. .. . . .. . ......... . .. ... .... Nutrient Enrichment . .. ... .. .... .... N 1- 1 MI, .. ........ ........... . . .. .. ... . .. . .. ..I lh e re a ive environmental impact ot each response method tor the specific environment or habitat tor each oil type, using the tollowing detinitions: . . .......... ...... .. ............... . .... ...... .. . . ..... . .. B May cause some adverse habitat impact . . . . .. .... ayl.", a 'h ... . .. .. . . . ., irl "::- '-w-.- 11--, @ @- ", @ @ " @_, . ....... . .. ... .... ... ... ."flil t, '4 . . . ............ .... . .. . ..... .. ...... ............. ..... ...... ....... . . .... .... D May cause the most adverse habitat impact. . ..... .... ....... ... uA e thod'- t I t Not applicable for this oil type. 16 Table 8. DIESEL-LIKE OILS: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in water environments. WATER ENVIRONMENT Response Open Large Smol/ Sma// Method Water Rivers LakeslPonds RiverslStreams PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHODS W ,!1*Cq"ry A A .......... .. . ........ .. .... .. . .... .. ... Booming A A A A .... .. . .. .... ::A A% Barriers/Berms A .8 Ph H 0q.; ... .... ... Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning C C .. .. .... . ..... . ............ ii@iii,@,il@ fth Of -t I Sorbents B B A A M A A Debris Removal B B B men Vegetation Removal B B B B ..... ................................ . n A .......... . ...... Flooding .. . ..... .. . ...... .... a er: U P High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing Xii U iiftsur 0, High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing ..... ....... .......... 0' MONO!!, .... .. . ..... Sand Blasting C-REMICALAESMONSFIME1HODS' Dispersants B C D D t h E'.. Sion, T(ta In I Ag rk .. ..... .. .Q 0. Visco-Elastic Agents B B B B if,: X'i::: a t Solidifiers B B B B . ...... .. . "A SlWett 046-: 6f Shoreline Cleaning Agents Ato 6N$cMETHO1)s_ Nutrient Enrichment -0, @ro atj !"n t.,o M,P e eqy. iro jenta i us Flpi@r 4 v rie ............ for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: U'Utiadvei'S"t', h bita, B May cause some adverse habitat impact. .......... ,an i-a erse:@ a r t h b tat dtv. D= May cause the most adverse habitat impact. f th Id f4i h' I at a v I ikit 'i .1 t 10 6 a n ss.b i: el @e Ive e to 11 . U @, no::l i::@ _11"! 11:1 V-2 U t tt S -2 Not applicable for this oil type. 17 Table 9. DIESEL-LIKE OILS: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in shoreline habitats. SHORELINE HABITAT Response Man- Vegetated Sondand Method Bedrock Made Sand Shores Grovel Grovel Mud Wetlands PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHODS 1,2,8- 1.8 3,4 9 5 6 7,9 10 Booming 0 Barriers/Berms Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning B A B B B B D D Sorbents A A A A A A A A Debris Removal A A A B A A B B Vegetation Removal B C Flooding A A A A A A A A High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing B A D C C B D D High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D B D D D D D D Sand Blasting D C NEW Dispersants Viisco-Elastic Agents Solidifiers B B B D D D Shoreline Cleaning Agents B - I D I Nutrient Enrichment C C B B B B I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or A = May cause the least adverse habitat impact. C = May cause significant adverse habitat impact. I = Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. xi 18 Table 10. MEDIUM OILS: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in water environments. WATER ENVIRONMENT Response Open Large Smal/ Sma// Method Water Rivers LokeslPonds- RiverslStreams PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHODS B C I R Vra Booming A A A A . .. .. .. .. .. . mfnao].: k A . ........... Barriers/Berms A Y Icat 0 Win Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning B C C C 9c, toll oval ardea B Sorbents B B A A A A A Debris Removal B B B t4twork" oon,,, Vegetation Removal B B B B A B 0, n iturBurnin Flooding Ing ow;-ftesspit W t Flu fi High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing r sureil es High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing -aw esn@ Sand Blasting CHSMICAU ESPONSEUETHODS Dispersants B C D D Tu B B I t 11510n7re ting Ats en, Visco-Elastic Agents B B B B B D 9'@ Solidifiers B B B B ........... . . .... . . ..... i dre ine, k.1 tMatmen Shoreline Cleaning Agents ONSE%@METHOIDS. Nutrient Enrichment I .. .... ... . . . .. ............ Tht fowi@ r I ,W resportse. me 99pe fe", S JoEcomoare thg, relatl impatt oF@Wh: WA for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: .... ....... . . . .. ......... . . . . .. . . ... ....... .. .... . ........... .... . . A M &414w"" @1 A, tat'._ .. .... ........ B May cause some adverse habitat impact. D May cause the most adverse habitat impact. M t e T"t could: pdT@i t,evaj4#t,, 4 t Not a,p..0"Ii1c,able' r'thi 19 Table 11. MEDIUM OILS: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in shoreline habitats. SHORELINE HABITAT Response Man- Vegetated Sand and Method Bedrock Made Sand Shores Gravel Gravel Mud Wetlands PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHODS 1,2.8* 1,8 3,4 9 5 6 7,9 10 Booming Barriers/Berms Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning B B A B A B C C Sorbents A A A B A A A A 'V Debris Removal A A A B A A B B Vegetation Removal B C . . . . ... .... . . . . . Flooding B B A A A A A A C., High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing B A D C C B D D M High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing C B D D D D D D .... . .... ....... . ... .... ... D@ . . . . . .... n ... .. . .. Sand Blasting D C ZH Dispersants Visco-Elastic Agents Solidifiers B B B D B B C D . . .... .. Shoreline Cleaning Agents B B B I B B D I . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .... ...... ..... ........... . ... . . ...... . . ... . . law _. ... . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . L ... ..... ... ... ... Nutrient Enrichment C C B B B B I I . . . . . ... . .. .. .. .. . . . . ..... . . ... ... .. of h response metho or e speci ici ironmeni C May cause significant adverse habitat impact. I Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. YEE, . .... S.0"? 20 Table 12. HEAVY OILS: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in water environments. WATER ENVIRONMENT Response Open Large Smal/ Sma// Method Water Rivers LakeslPonds RiverslStreams PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHODS C:_ Booming A A A A A A A A_` Barriers/Berms A y H di B s'lcal. ter " Ing: Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning B B B B .. .. ........ ...... .... ... ..... M h 1.0 1.111 Natc.. anica 1, t ova Sorbents B B A A .. . ......... . A A, Debris Removal B B B Reworkin Vegetation Removal B B B B A B 8 lnSft. Surfflng.@. Flooding A Lo- pret Col&@t' Flush! W@ Mure, ng High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing ..... . . . ..... @:,:'.,Lbw-press rej H t W t 0 h er us Ing High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing Sum Cleaning Sand Blasting CHEMICAL RESPONSE METHODS Dispersants Emulsionlreating.Agtnts B 1 1, Visco-Elastic Agents - Herding 61111ts': Solidifiers hemicall hore toe, Yetreatment: Shoreline Cleaning Agents 91.0"C&RESPONStIMETHODS Nutrient Enrichment 14cr . ... .. ... . .... ... . ... re us, a to C The f It tt i'' Im t more: the telot Ve eaviro"mentall. I ni ctofe h Pa a r"poh5e Met for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: ...... ..... we avcattwt Ceti erfi, taffm act',, 01i t P cause so m e adv erse habi tat impact. M 44,*@@ aTcau @ip fil t a ftat4mpa& D May cause the most adverse habitat impact. nsu. glen . rm 164@Ampiic Iveness: 0 thecmethod 0611& not@ be eva uate 1his.. 1me.::.--' ff, _t 11W Atfl t or effictI f .. ...... .... Not applicable for this oil type. 21 Table 13. HEAVY OILS: Summary of relative environmental impact from response methods for spills in shoreline habitats. SHORELINE HABITAT Response Man- Vegetated Sand and Method Bedrock Made Sand Shores Gravel Gravel Mud Wetlands PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHODS 1,2,8' 1,8 3,4 9 5 6 7,9 10 Booming Barriers/Berms Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning A AA B A A C C Sorbents B BB B B B B A ........... 1 711 Debris Removal A AA B A A B B Vegetation Removal B C Flooding C CB B C C A B MR@ High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing B BD D C B D D High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing C BD D D D D D Sand Blasting D C Pit J, Dispersants MOW Visco-Elastic Agents .. . . ....... . .. .. . . . . ........ . . . .... . .__ . . ... ..... . .. . ........ . .... ... .. . ... .. .. . .. ... .... n. . . ... .. 'n ...... ... . . . . ........ .. . ...... .. ......... ..... ........... ............... . . .......... . .-. . . ........... . . . ......... . ....... . .. . ..... ..... . . . . ...... . .. .. ......... ..... . .. ... .. . ..... __M .. ... .. ....... . . en . . .. . .... .... . ...... .. . ..... ..... . . . .. ......... . . ........ . . . . . . . . .. .. .. ..... .. .... ........... . . . ....... ... . ... ....... . . . . .... .... ... . . ... _ -, . ..... . . ....... . ... ..... . . ....... .. ......... . . .. . .. . .. ... ... ...... ._x __ ___ ......... .......... .. . . ... . .......... . . ........ ..... . . .... . .......... . . ... ..... . . Solidifiers Shoreline Cleaning Agents B BB I B B D I ....... ... .... . . ... ...... . .. ........ ...... . . ..... .. ... .... .. . . .... ...... ..... . . .. ..... ... .. .. . ...... .. . .. ... . . . . _x ... . .. ... ....... .. ... . .. . ..... . ....... ........ . ._'. __ __ ....... .... .......... . . .. .. .. ..... . . . . ...... .. . ...... . .. ......... .. . . ........... . . .. . . .. .... . .. .... .. .. ... .. . . . . . . . . . ............ .. . . . ........... . . ........ . ......... . .____ @% ........ . .. .. . .. .. .. .... . . . . . .. . ...... . . ....... .. X__ . . ..... .. . . .... ..... e@ .......... .. .. . .. .......... ........ . .... . . . . . .. . ..... .... ...... ..... . ... . ... ......... ......... . . ..... . . .. . . . . .. _s . .. .... xm . .. ..... . . . .... .. . . . . .... .... . .. . . . z. . .. ....... . . . . .. . ........ . . . ........ . ... ........ . z. . . . .. .... ... ...... .. ..... ......... __ . ...... .. . .......... . . . ........ Nutrient Enrichment D DC B C C I I T!'f!'20 A May cause the least adverse habitat impact. . . . . . . .. .... . C - May cause significant adverse habitat impact. I - Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. 22 3.0 SPILL RESPONSE METHODS FOR SPECIFIC INLAND HABITATS 3.1 INTRODUCTION Oil spill protection, recovery, and cleanup methods are described in the following sections for four water environments and eight shoreline habitats. Each section is organized in the following format: � Description of the environment or habitat; � Matrices of response methods for four oil types; and � Short summaries of the key issues considered for each response method. The inland habitats are presented in order of their sensitivity, from least to most sensitive to oil spill impact, first for water environments, then for shoreline habitats. Accordingly, water environments begin with large rivers and end with small lakes and ponds. Shoreline habitats begin with bedrock and end with wetlands. Response methods in each matrix are listed in order, generally beginning with those that cause the least adverse habitat impact, to those that can cause the most adverse habitat impact. Methods for which insufficient information is available for some habitats are listed last. Methods that are not applicable for all four oil types are excluded from the tables. The use of water environments and shoreline habitats generally reflects the distinction between oil on a water body versus oil that is stranded at the land-water interface. Water-based activities consist mostly of containment, protection, and collection methods while onshore response includes protection, recovery, and cleanup. A large spill will likely affect a wide range of habitats and require use of many different methods. However, large spills can be divided into a series of small spills for developing site-specific response strategies. Often, more than one response method can be used with minimal habitat impacts. Spill conditions may dictate selecting a specific method, or combination of methods, over other possible methods. We encourage you to refer to Section 4 for more information on each response method. Also, the references listed in Appendix A can provide valuable, detailed information on specific topics or applications. 23 13.2 OPEN WATER I i(iNtat Description Open-water environments exist in large water bodies, such as the Great Lakes, Lake Champlain, and Lake Mead. These large water bodies have ocean-like wave and current conditions; however, lake currents are generally weak (less than one knot). Local weather conditions commonly cause sudden changes in sea state. Suspended sediment loads are highly variable, both spatially and over time. River mouths are particularly problematic areas, with high suspended sediment and debris loads, shallow zones, and manmade structures, which create complex water circulation patterns. Thermal stratification with an upper, warm layer over cool, denser water is a common feature of large lakes during the warmer months. In most temperate lakes, stratification ends in the autumn when surface cooling combines with water mixing from high winds. Ice formation is a common characteristic of interior and northern lakes in winter months. Although all inland waters are surrounded by land, response operations for open-water environments are water-based; that is, protection and recovery equipment must be deployed from vessels. Sensitivitg Open waters are considered to have low to medium sensitivity to oil spill impact because physical removal rates are high, water-column concentrations of oil can be rapidly diluted, and most organisms are mobile enough to move out of the area affected by the spill. Enclosed and protected areas of large lakes are more sensitive than offshore and nearshore waters because of slower dilution rates. Oil spills can affect -fish in the water column, with the early life stages at greatest risk. Also, many birds (waterfowl, raptors, gulls, terns, and diving birds) feed and rest on the water, and therefore are highly vulnerable. Human use of affected areas may be restricted for a period of time, potentially limiting access for navigation, transportation, water intakes, or recreational activities during the spill. Free-floating flora or mats can occur in sheltered bays of nutrient-rich lakes. Such mats may be particularly susceptible to oil because of their location in bays where oil may accumulate. Moreover, the plants are at the water surface (where the oil is) and without underground roots to regenerate after being oiled. 24 Table 14. Relative environmental impact from response methods for OPEN WATER environ- ments. Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils Booming - Deflection/Exclusion A A A A Booming - Containment A A A SkimmingNacuum A A A in-Situ Burning A A A Natural Recovery A A B B Physical Herding B B B B Sorbents B B B Vegetation Removal B B B Emulsion Treating Agents B B B Visco-Elastic Agents/Solidifiers B B Dispersants D B B Herding Agents D B B Manual Oil RemovaXleaning B Mechanical Oil Removal B Nutrient Enrichment I I Natural Microbe Seeding I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A = May cause the least adverse habitat impact. B = May cause some adverse habitat impact. C = May cause significant adverse habitat impact. D = May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I =Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. =Not applicable for this oil type. 25 RESPONSE METHODS: OPEN WATER ENVIRONMENTS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Booming � Most effective in low-wave conditions and slow currents � Safety concerns limit the containment of gasoline spills; however, booms can be used to exclude or deflect the spill away from sensitive resources SkimminglVacuum � Effectiveness limited by current velocities and widely spread, thin sheens � Not applicable to gasoline spills because of safety.concerns In-.Situ Burning � Most appropriate in offshore, rather than nearshore, areas � More difficult to ignite emulsified and heavy oils and sustain the bum � Safety issues for workers, vessels, and aircraft must be addressed � Not applicable to gasoline spills due to safety concerns and containment difficulties Natural Recouery Low impact except for medium- to heavy-category oils, which are persistent and would eventually strand on shorelines Some Adverse Habitat Impaet Physical Herding � May be needed under calm conditions to move oil toward recovery devices � Water spray onto gasoline likely to mix the product into the water column Sorbents � Not a stand-alone technique except for very small spills � Inhibit the evaporation of gasoline spills Vegetation Remoual May be appropriate if oil is trapped in floating vegetation 26 Emulsion-7'reating Agents Not applicable to oils that do not form emulsions, such as gasoline Visco-Elastic Agents/Solidifiers 0 Not appropriate to gasoline spills because of safety concerns during application and inhibition of evaporation 0 The recovery of treated oil must be considered 0 Most are not very effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil Dispersants 0 Inhibit the evaporation of gasoline spills 0 Use requires comparing the impact of dispersed versus undispersed oil 0 Not effective on heavy or weathered oils Herding Agents * Most effective under calm conditions 0 Not applicable to heavy oils because oil must be fluid 0 Inhibit the evaporation of gasoline spills Manual Oil ReMouallCleaning and Mechanical Oil Remoual � Effective only when heavy oils have solidified into large masses � Complete removal of heavy oil is rarely achieved Insuffleient information Nutrient Enrichment and Natural Microbe Seeding � Not applicable to gasoline and diesel-like oils because they rapidly evaporate � There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness for other oil types, particularly for open-water applications in freshwater 27 3.3 LARGE RIVERS HuNtat Description Large rivers have varying salinities, meandering channels, and high flow rates (currents usually greater than one knot). These rivers are not necessarily navigable to large vessels. If they are, the environment can include associated locks, dams, pools, and other manmade structures. Examples of large rivers include the Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Hudson River, the Delaware River, and the Columbia River. Water levels vary seasonally, with potential for reversal of water flow up tributaries and into backwater lakes during high water. Floodplains are common characteristics of large rivers. Floods generate high suspended sediment and debris loads. In northern regions, ice covers the surface in winter. River banks or bars are discussed in the sections on shore habitats (Sections 3.6 to 3.13), and backwater lakes are discussed in Section 3.4. Sensitivity Large rivers have medium sensitivity to oil spill impact because, even though they have high natural removal rates, they also have extensive biological and human use. Biological resources of concern include concentrations of migratory waterfowl and shorebirds, fish, and endangered mussel beds. Under flood conditions, river floodplains contain highly sensitive areas that are important habitats for many valuable species. Floating vegetation is present in areas of low flow. Recreational use of rivers is very high, and many are major transportation corridors. Drinking, industrial, and cooling water intakes are quite vulnerable to oil spills in this environment because of turbulent mixing, and they often shut down when slicks are present. High currents, eddies, mid-river bars, ice formation, and flooding may complicate response measures in this habitat. Water flow across weirs and dams is of special concern because it is often turbulent and likely to emulsify oil slicks as they pass over these structures. Emulsified oil has a density close to water; it can readily suspend beneath the surface and remain in the water column as it moves through a series of locks and dams. Also, oil can adsorb onto sediment particles, which then settle out in quiet backwaters, potentially contaminating these habitats. 28 LARG E R I VE R 9961 h: .Yi N Scour Channel .......... . Floodl Water Level___@ slou h @Normml Water Level -4;11 y Sand, X, u Oravell mu'i Gi Stan I Ing Water Flowing Water Flood Plain ,o Flood Plain Channel 29 Table 15. Relative environmental impact from response methods for LARGE RIVER environments. Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils Booming - Deflection/Exclusion A A A A Booming - Containment - A A A Skimming/Vacuum - A A A Natural Recovery A A B C Physical Herding B B B B Sorbents - B B B In-Situ Burning - B B B Emulsion Treating Agents - B B B Vegetation Removal - B B B Debris Removal - B B B B B Visco-Elastic Agents/Solidifiers - B B B Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning - - B B Mechanical Oil Removal - - B B Dispersants D C C - Herding Agents D D D - Nutrient Enrichment - - I I Natural Microbe Seeding - - I I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A = May cause the least adverse habitat impact. B = May cause some adverse habitat impact. C = May cause significant adverse habitat impact. D = May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I =Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. "-" =Not applicable for this oil type. 30 RESPONSE METHODS: LARGE RIVER ENVIRONMENTS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Boorning � Used primarily for diverting slicks towards collection points in low-current areas � Safety concerns limit the containment of gasoline spills; however, booms can be used to exclude or deflect the spill away from sensitive resources SkirnminglVacuum Not applicable to gasoline spills because of safety concerns Some Adverse Habitat ImPaet Natural Recouery � For small gasoline and diesel-like spills, evaporation and natural dispersion would rapidly remove surface slicks � For all other types and sizes of spills, oil recovery and/or protection of sensitive resources should be attempted Phgsi(,a] Herding � May be needed to flush oil trapped in debris, eddies, etc. toward recovery devices � Water spray onto gasoline spills will likely enhance mixing of the product into the water column Sorlx,nts � Not applicable to gasoline spills because of safety concerns and inhibition of evaporation � May not be practical for large rivers because oil will spread and drift rapidly � Overuse results in excess waste generation In-.Situ Burning � May not be practical in rivers because oil will spread rapidly � Containment and maintenance of minimum thickness for burning (1-3 millimeters) is difficult in fast currents Etnulsion-Treating Agents Not applicable for gasoline products, which do not emulsify 31 Vegetation Removal � May be considered where oil is trapped in floating vegetation along shore and in eddies � Removal of oiled vegetation may be required to prevent secondary oiling of wildlife or chronic sheening Debris Removal River debris can trap persistent oils, causing chronic sheening and exposure of aquatic resources Visco-Elastic AgentslSolidifiers 0 Not applicable to gasoline spills because of safety concerns during application and inhibition of evaporation 0 Recovery of treated oil may be difficult 0 May not be practical in rivers because oil will spread and drift rapidly o Not effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil Manual oil RemouallCleaning e Concentrations of heavy oils that have hardened into solid or semi-solid masses can be manually picked up, from boat or shore 0 Hand tools can be used to pick up small accumulations of oiled debris * Operations conducted from boats minimize potential for habitat disruption by trampling onshore Mechanical Oil Removal 0 May be needed to recover large amounts of oil/oily debris trapped in booms or along shore 0 Equipment can be operated from barges with less impact; shore-based operations are likely to cause localized disruption of shoreline habitat Probable Adverse Habitat ImPaet Disr)ersants 0 Inhibit the evaporation of gasoline spills 0 Not effective on heavy or weathered oils 0 For large spills, limited dilution of dispersed oil in rivers likely to raise toxicity concerns * Impacts on water intakes downstream would have to be evaluated 32 Most Adverse Habitat Impaet Herding Agents � High currents make proper application difficult and carry product away � Not applicable to heavy oils because oil must be fluid Insuffleient Information Nutrient Enrichment and Natural Microbe Seeding � Not applicable to gasoline and diesel-like oil spills because they rapidly evaporate � There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness for other oil types, particularly for applications in rivers 33 3.4 SMALL LAKES AND PONDS Habitat Description Lakes and ponds are standing bodies of water of variable size and water depth. Waves and currents are generally very low, although the water surface can become choppy. Water levels can fluctuate widely over time, particularly on manmade lakes. Smaller ponds can completely freeze over in winter. The bottom sediments close to shore can be soft and muddy, and the surrounding land can include wet meadows and marshes. Floating vegetation can be common. The rate of water exchange is highly variable within this group, ranging from days to years. These water bodies can include sections of a river with low flow rates (e.g., behind diversion dams) or that are somewhat isolated from regular flow (e.g., backwater lakes or oxbow lakes). Isolated water bodies, such as kettle lakes, are unique members of this category because they have no surface water outflow, and therefore have very low flushing rates. In shallow water, boat operations would be limited and most response operations would be conducted from shore. Sensitiuity Small lakes and ponds have medium to high sensitivity to oil spill impact because of low physical removal rates, limited dilution and flushing of oil mixed into the water column, and high biological and human use. They provide valuable habitat for migrating and nesting birds and mammals, and support important fisheries. Small lakes can be the focus of local recreational activities. Associated wetlands have higher sensitivities and are discussed in Section 3.13. Wind will control the distribution of slicks, holding the oil against a lee shore or spreading it along shore and into catchment areas. Wind shifts can completely change the location of slicks, contaminating previously clean areas. Thus, early protection of sensitive areas is important. The inlet and outlet are key areas for focusing protection efforts. Oil impacts on floating vegetation depend to a large degree on dose, with possible elimination of plants at high doses. Section 5 addresses sinking oils and response under ice conditions. 34 SMALL LAKES PONDS Flood Water Level - - - - - - - - - - - - - Normal Water Level Muddy Sand Organic Mud !'4:. 1 Ore I anIcu Water, Water- logged I I logged Submerged Open Water Submerged 35 Table 16. Relative environmental impact from response methods for SMALL LAKE and POND environments. Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Booming - Containment A A A A Skimming/Vacuum - A A A Sorbents - A A A Natural Recovery A B C C In-Situ Burning B B B B Herding Agents B B B B B Debris Removal - B B B Vegetation Removal - B B B Physical Herding C B B B Visco-Elastic Agents/Solidifiers - B B - Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning - C C B Mechanical Oil Removal - C C C Dispersants D D D - Emulsion Treating Agents - I I I Nutrient Enrichment - I I I Natural Microbe Seeding - I I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A = May cause the least adverse habitat impact. B = May cause some adverse habitat impact. C = May cause significant adverse habitat impact. D = May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I =Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness could not be evaluated at this time. "-" =Not applicable for this oil type. 36 RESPONSE METHODS: SMALL LAKE AND POND ENVIRONMENTS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Booming � Use containment booms to keep oil from spreading � Safety concerns limit the containment of gasoline spills; however, booms can be used to exclude or deflect the spill away from sensitive resources SkimminglVocuum � Not applicable to gasoline spills because of safety concerns � Land-based operations need site-specific restrictions and monitoring to minimize physical destruction Sorbents � Overuse results in excess waste generation � Inhibit the evaporation of gasoline spills Some Adverse Habitat Impaet Noturul Recouery Low impact for light oils but may have significant impact for medium crudes and heavier fuel oils because they persist and affect shoreline habitats In-Situ Burning � Less environmental impact in winter when snow and ice provide some protection, plants are dormant, and fewer animals are present � Safety concerns limit containment of gasoline, but may be safely used with natural containment, such as gasoline trapped in ice Herding Agents � Most effective under calm conditions � Should be coupled with recovery when used to protect sensitive habitats � Not effective on heavy oils because oil must be fluid 37 Dehris Removal � Debris may be associated with nests or living areas (e.g., beaver lodges), so impacts on resident animal habitat may need consideration � Operate from small boats to minimize substrate disruption Vegetation Removal � If oil is trapped in floating vegetation, may be only way to recover the oil in the absence of water currents � May be appropriate to prevent secondary oiling of wildlife Physical Herding Care should be taken not to drive oil into the water column or sediment Visco-Elastic AgentslSolidifiers � Visco-elastic agents, by improving overall oil recovery from the water surface, reduce secondary shoreline oiling � Not applicable to gasoline spills because of safety concerns during application and inhibition of evaporation � Not effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil Probable Adverse Habitat Impaet Manual Oil RemouallCleaning � Inherent inefficiency of manual removal of fluid oils would require large crews or repeated entries, resulting in disruption to substrate and wildlife � Not applicable for gasoline spills because of safety concerns Mectianical Oil Removal May be needed where oil has heavily contaminated bottom sediments May require very intrusive recovery techniques Most Adverse Habitat ImPaets DispersOn ts � Inhibit the evaporation of gasoline spills � Shallow water depths and I o*w dilution rates may result in high aquatic toxicity from oil/dispersant mixtures 38 insuffleient Information Emulsion-Treating Agents � Not applicable to oils that do not form emulsions, such as gasoline � Insufficient toxicity data to evaluate environmental impact of shallow freshwater environment use Nutrient Enrichment and Natural Microbe Seeding � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate � There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness for other oil types � There are special concerns about nutrient overloading in small, restricted water bodies 39 3.5 SMALL RIVERS AND STREAMS HaNtat Description Small rivers and streams are characterized by shallow water (generally 1-2 meters) and narrow channels. Water flow can be highly variable, both throughout the seasons and with distance downstream. This grouping includes a wide range of waterbodies, from fast-flowing streams with low falls and numerous rapids over bedrock and gravel, to slow-moving bayous bordered by low muddy banks and fringed with vegetation. Sections of the channel may be choked with log jams and debris, and mid-channel bars and islands can divide water flow into multiple channels. Both boat and vehicular access can be very limited; often the only access will be at bridge crossings. Ice may further complicate response measures in this habitat. Sensitiuity Small rivers and streams have medium to high sensitivity to oil spill impact. Oil spills may have more of an impact on small rivers and streams than on large rivers due to a variety of conditions, such as lower flow conditions, lower dilution rates, lower overall energy, and greater range of natural habitats. Fish spawn in streams and the tributaries of larger rivers; thus, the most sensitive, early life stages can be present. Fringing wetlands and adjacent floodplains are closely connected to small rivers and streams, and they are areas of high biological use and low natural removal rates. Slicks usually contaminate both banks, and non-viscous oils are readily mixed into the entire water column in shallow streams, potentially exposing both aquatic and benthic organisms to oil. Initial weathering rates may be slower because spreading and evaporation are restricted in narrow channels And heavy vegetation cover. Fish kills are possible for spills ranging from gasoline to medium crude oils. Many different kinds of mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians use the stream bank habitats, and there can be localized high mortality rates of these animals. Spills can cause closure of water intakes for drinking water, irrigation, or industrial use along small rivers. A more aggressive response may be appropriate to prevent contamination Of downstream habitat, particularly if water intakes, populated areas, or special habitat resources are present. 40 5MALL RIVER5 5TREAMS y". _V Flood We or Lev I Sand, Gravel `7 Normal Water Level and Sand, Sand, m d Gravel Gravel -Flood Plain 10 Channel Flood Plain 41 Table 17. Relative environmental impact from response methods for SMALL RIVER and STREAM environments. Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils 860minq - Deflection/Exclusion A A A A Skimming A A A A Booming -Containment A A A Vacuum A A A Sorbents A A A Barriers/Berms B A A A Physical Herding B B B B Natural Recovery A B C C Debris, Removal B B B Visco-Elastic Agents/Solidifiers B B B Vegetation Removal B B B In-Situ Burning C B B B Manual Oil RemovaVCleaning C C B Mechanical Oil Removal C C C Dispersants D D D Herding Agents D D D Emulsion Treating Agents I I I Nutrient Enrichment I I I Natural Microbe Seeding I I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A= May cause the least adverse habitat impact. 13= May cause some adverse habitat impact. C= May cause significant adverse habitat impact. D= May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I= Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. Not applicable for this oil type. 42 RESPONSE METHODS: SMALL RIVER AND STREAM ENVIRONMENTS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Booming � Used primarily to divert slicks towards collection points in low-current areas � Safety concerns limit the containment of gasoline spills; however, booms can exclude or deflect the spill away from sensitive resources � Expect low effectiveness with fast currents, shallow water, and steep banks SkimminglVacuum To protect public health and downstream resources where spreading is limited, recovery of large gasoline spills could be attempted with firefighting foam to suppress vapors and respiratory protection for workers Sorbents � Deploy in booms to recover sheens in low-current areas and along shore � Trampling of stream bank and bed habitats during deployment and recovery of sorbents can disrupt strearnside vegetation and drive oil into the sediment � Overuse results in excess waste generation BarrierslBerms � Potential for physical disruption and sediment contamination in immediate area of the barrier/berm � If all or most of the flow is diverted, may need to monitor water requirements to habitats downstream of the barrier to mitigate potential impacts � Safety concerns limit actions at gasoline spills, although berms built ahead of the slick could be used to exclude oil from sensitive areas, such as side channels Some Adverse Habitat Impaet Physical Herding � May be only means to flush oil trapped in log jams, beaver dams, behind rocks, and in vegetation/ debris along banks to downstream collection areas � Spraying of gasoline spills can mix the oil into the water column 43 Natural Recovery � For small gasoline and diesel-like oil spills, evaporation and natural dispersion would rapidly remove surface slicks � For all other types and sizes of spills, recovery of free or pooled oil and/or protection of sensitive resources should be attempted Debris Removal Will release trapped oil and speed natural flushing rates Visco-Elastic AgentslSolidifiers � Visco-elastic agents may speed recovery of contained oil when time is critical � Solidifiers may immobilize even gasoline spills, preventing their transport downstream and further impact � Ineffective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product.to mix into the oil Vegetation Removal � May be needed to remove oil trapped in floating and fringing vegetation � Remove oiled vegetation to prevent chronic sheening in sensitive areas or secondary oiling of wildlife � Monitor crews to minimize physical disturbance, which can be severe in-Situ Burning � May be difficult to protect stream-side vegetation � Safety concerns limit containment of gasoline, but may be safely used if natural containment is present � Less impact in winter when snow/ice provide some protection, plants are dormant, and fewer animals are present � May not be practical in fast flowing streams where containment and maintenance of minimum slick thickness (1-3 millimeters) may be difficult Probable. Adverse Habitat Impaet Manual Oil RernovallCleaning � Viable for heavy oils that have solidified versus fluid oils that have spread � Stream bank disruption likely from movement of work crews 44 Mechanical Oil Remoual Only consider when large amounts of solidified oil have accumulated in the stream channel and need to be removed quickly Most Adverse Habitat Impact Dispersan ts Enhanced mixing of oil into the water column with restricted dilution will increase acute toxicity to aquatic organisms I lerdit ig Agents 0 Toxicity concerns when early life stages are present 0 May not be practical due to fast currents and rough water surface * Oil must be fluid, so not appropriate to heavy oils insuffleient Information Emulsion-Treating Agents � Insufficient toxicity data to evaluate environmental impact of shallow freshwater environment use � Not applicable to oils that do not form emulsions, such as gasoline Nutrient Enrichment and Natural Microbe Seeding � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate � There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness, particularly for applications in small rivers and streams 45 3.6 BEDROCK HABITATS (ESI = 1 A, 2, 8A) flabitut DeSCription This shoreline type is characterized by an impermeable rocky substrate. The rock surface can be highly irregular, with numerous cracks and crevices. The slope of the shoreline varies from vertical rocky cliffs to shelving bedrock shores where flat or gently dipping rock layers have been cut by waves into wide platforms. Bedrock habitats are exposed to wide ranges in wave energy; headlands in the Great Lakes and other large lakes are the most exposed and bedrock shorelines in sheltered takes are the least exposed. There can be a thin veneer of sand and gravel sediments on the rock platforms, although storm waves will strip these sediments off exposed shorelines. Boulder-sized debris can accumulate at the base of exposed rocky cliffs. Sensitivity Bedrock shoreline habitats have a range of sensitivities to oil spills, depending upon their degree of exposure to natural removal processes. They have few attached organisms and plants, and rocky shore productivity is typically low. However, they may provide shelter to fish and nesting sites for birds which can be present in large numbers in nearshore waters. In exposed settings, oil may be partially held offshore by wave reflection off steep cliffs and platforms. Any oil that is deposited will be rapidly removed from exposed faces, although oil persistence on any specific shoreline segment is related to the incoming wave energy during, and shortly after, a spill. The most resistant oil would occur as a patchy band at or above the high water line, or deposited in any surface sediments. In sheltered settings, oil will readily adhere to the rough rocky surface, forming a distinct band along the water line. Cracks and crevices will be sites of oil pooling and persistence. Oil will also penetrate and persist in any surface sediments. Medium to heavy oils can be very sticky and form thick black bands, while lighter oils are more readily removed by wave action, evaporation, and response efforts. 46 BEPROC K Sh elving Rock Submerged Rock Ledge U soil-, Rock Cliff a@a Large Waves Bedrock Zone of Normal Water Level Deep Water Change Submerged Land Zone 47 Table 18. Relative environmental impact from response methods for BEDROCK habitats (ESI=1A, 2, 8A). Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils Natural Recovery A A A B Debris Romoval - A A A Sorbents B A A B Flooding B A B C Low-Pressure,Cold-Water Flushing B A A C High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing B B B B Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning - B B B Vacuum - B B B In-Situ Burning - B B B B B B Shoreline Cleaning Agents - - B B B B Solidifiers - B B - Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing - C B B Nutrient Enrichment - C C D High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing - D C C Steam. Cleaning - D D D Sand Blasting - D D D Natural Microbe Seeding - I I I Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment - I I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A =May cause the least adverse habitat impact. B = May cause some adverse habitat impact. C = May cause significant adverse habitat impact. D = May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I =Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. "-" =Not applicable for this oil type. 48 RESPONSE METHODS: BEDROCK HABITATS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Natural Recouerg � Sheltered bedrock may need cleanup because of slow natural removal rates � Cleanup of larger spills may be needed because of the amount of oil present � Heavy oils may persist on all but the most exposed shores Debris Remoual Degree of oiling that warrants debris removal and disposal depends on human and sensitive resource use of the site Sorbents � Overuse generates excess waste � Physical removal rates of heavy oils will be slow, so less oil will be mobilized for recovery by sorbents Some Adverse Habitat Impaet Flooding and Low-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing � Most effective on fresh, fluid oils � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment � Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats I ligh-1 @Iressure, Cold-Water Flushing Primarily applicable to medium-crude oils while still fresh and liquid Can be effective in removing oil from crevices and pockets of sediment on bedrock Manual Oil RemouallCleaning � Expect significant residues of diesel and medium oils with only manual removal because of their fluidity and difficulty of manual pickup � Useful for heavy oils in patches or crevices Vacuum Not applicable to gasoline spills because of safety concerns 49 In-Situ Burning � Can effectively remove heavy oil accumulations � Concerns about air pollution, thermal impact on biota, and physical nature of the residue Shoreline Cleaning Agents � May be only technique to remove sticky oils without hot-water, high-pressure washing � Individual products vary in their toxicity and recoverability of the treated oil Solidifiers � Prevent the oil from being washed back into the water and are most appropriate for heavy accumulations of pooled oil on shelving bedrock � Not effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil Low-Pressure, Hot Water Flushing � Any organisms in the application area would be adversely affected by hot water � Most effective on heavy crudes where heat would make oil more fluid Probable Adverse Habitat Impaet Nutrient Enrichment � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate � Concerns about nutrient overloading in poorly flushed areas or where nutrient toxicity, especially ammonia, might be significant � Potentially effective for lighter oils that leave thin residues; less effective for thick, weathered oil residues High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing o Will likely kill any attached organisms; use is appropriate in limited areas only when oil removal is needed for aesthetic reasons Most Adverse Habitat ImPaet Steam Cleaning And Sand Blasting � Highly intrusive techniques that will kill any organisms present � Use only for aesthetic reasons in very limited areas 50 Insufficient Information Nattiral Microbe Seechno There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness Chernical Shoreline Pretreatment There is insufficient information on available products, their effectiveness, or impact 3.7 MANMADE STRUCTURES (ES1 = I B, 6B, 8B) Habitat Description Manmade structures include vertical shore protection structures such as seawalls, piers, and bulkheads, as well as riprap revetments and groins, breakwaters, and jetties. Vertical structures can be constructed of concrete, wood, and corrugated metal. They usually extend below the water surface, although seawalls can have beaches or riprap in front of them. Riprap revetments are constructed of boulder-sized pieces of rock, rubble, or formed concrete pieces (e.g., tetrapods), placed parallel to the shoreline for shore protection. Riprap groins are oriented perpendicular to shore to trap sediment; jetties are designed to protect and maintain channels; and breakwaters are offshore structures constructed to protect an area from wave attack. Riprap, structures have very large void spaces and are permeable, while seawalls and bulkheads have impermeable, solid substrates. These structures are very common along developed shores, particularly in harbors, marinas, and residential areas. The range in degree of exposure to waves and currents varies widely, from very low in dead-end canals, to very high on offshore breakwaters. Boat wakes can generate wave energy in otherwise sheltered areas. Sensitiuity Manmade structures have a range of sensitivities to oil spills, depending on the degree of exposure to natural removal processes. Biological communities and use are sparse. Often, there are sources of pollutants or habitat degradation nearby, such as urban runoff, chronic small oil spills in marinas, poor water quality, and limited water circulation. More intrusive cleanup techniques are often conducted due to their lower biological use, higher public demand for oil removal for aesthetic reasons, and need to minimize human exposure to oil in populated areas. It is acknowledged that manmade structures can vary in permeability, cohesion, and mobility and, in turn, how they are affected by oiling. In this document, however, manmade structures have been grouped together so that the higher de gree of cleanup often required can be adequately addressed. Vertical structures are generally impermeable to oil penetration, but oil can heavily coat rough surfaces, forming a band at the water line. During storms, oil can splash over the, top and contaminate terrestrial habitats. Riprap poses significant cleanup problems because of large void spaces between the riprap and heavy accumulations of debris. Large amounts of oil can become trapped in the riprap, where it is difficult to remove and a potential source of sheening. 52 MANMADE STRUCTURE5 w 111'. M A i@ -Band, Gravel 4 Rl RD -I."f r'..d. 6raval Wave Zone of Normal ;Splash Water Level Change Submerged Zone 53 Table 19. Relative environmental impact from response methods for MANMADE structures (ESI = 1 B, 6B, 813). Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning - A A A Debris Removal - A A A High-Pressure,Cold-Water Flushing B A A B Sorbents B A A B Vacuum - B A A Natural Recovery A A B B Flooding B A A C Low-Pressure,Cold-Water Flushing B A A C Low-Pressure,Hot-Water Flushing - B B B High-Pressure,Hot-Water Flushing - B B B Shoreline Cleaning Agents - B B B Solidifiers B B B - In-Situ Burning - B B - Nutrient Enrichment - C C D Steam Cleaning - C C C Sand Blasting - C C C Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment - I I I Natural Microbe Seeding - I I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A=May cause the least adverse habitat impact. B=May cause some adverse habitat impact. C=May cause significatn adverse habitat impact. D=May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I=Insufficient information-impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time "-"=Not applicable for this oil type. 54 RESPONSE METHODS: MANMADE STRUCTURES Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Manual oil RemouallCleaning and Debris Rernoual 0 Effective for removing debris and small, persistent pockets of oil I-ligh-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing � Effective for removing sticky oils from solid surfaces and flushing pooled oil from riprap crevices, even for gasoline in populated areas � May flush oiled sediments (if present) into nearshore bottom habitats � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment � Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Sorben ts � Use along riprap structures to recover residual sheening oil after other cleanup methods have been conducted, even for gasoline � Physical removal rates of heavy oils will be slow, so less oil will be mobilized for recovery by sorbents � Overuse results in excess waste generation Vacuum � Early use of vacuum on pooled oil in crevices can increase the oil recovery rate and minimize oil losses during flushing � Can only remove thick oil from accessible areas, so high residual oil likely Natural Recouerg � Most effective for lighter oils and more exposed settings � Heavier oils may necessitate removing persistent residues Some Adverse Habitat Impaet Flooding � Not applicable to seawalls; on riprap, only effective when the oil is fluid � May be used on riprap in developed areas, even for gasoline spills, where pockets of the spilled product pose human health concerns � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment 55 Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Low-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing Only effective when the oil is fluid Directed water spray can help remove trapped oil, even for gasoline Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Lotv-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing and High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing � Assumes that there are no biological communities in or immediately downslope from treatment area � High water temperatures are often needed to liquefy heavy oils � High water pressures are often needed to remove weathered oils from solid substrates and riprap Shoreline Cleaning Agents Individual products vary in their toxicity and ability to recover the treated oil Solidifiers � Appropriate to recover and control chronic sheening, even for gasoline � Not effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil In-Situ Burning � Thick oil likely to occur as isolated pockets that are difficult to access and bum � There will be concerns about air pollution and physical nature of the residue � Public safety issues for burning in developed areas will be of special concern Probable Adverse Habitat Impaet Nutrient Enrichment � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate � Concerns about nutrient overloading in poorly flushed areas or where nutrient toxicity, especially ammonia, might be significant � Potentially effective for lighter oils that leave thin residues; less effective for thick, weathered oil residues 56 Steam Cleaning and Sand Blasting 0 Used when removing persistent oil is required for aesthetic reasons Insuffleient Information Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment There is insufficient information on available products, their effectiveness, and impact Natural Microbe Seeding There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness, particularly for applications on manmade structures 57 3.8 SAND HABITATS (ESI = 4) Hobitat Description Sand habitats have a substrate composed of sediments that are predominantly finer than 2 millimeters but greater than silt or clay-sized material (see Appendix B for grain sizes). The shoreline may consist of well-sorted sands of one principal size, or of poorly sorted mixtures of muddy sand, gravelly sand, or a combination of these two. When the sediments are fine-grained sand, beaches may be wide and flat; where the sediments are coarse-grained sand, they usually are steeper and narrower. Sandy shorelines may be naturally eroding, accreting, or stable, and groins or breakwaters may be placed to trap sand and maintain some beaches. Exposed sand beaches can undergo rapid erosional or depositional changes during storms. In developed areas, sand beaches can be artificially created by man and are commonly used for recreation. Sand bars and banks along rivers are also included in this habitat. S(,'t]Sjtjujty Sand habitats have low to medium sensitivity to oil spills. They generally do not have sizable biological communities except where the habitat tends to be protected and consists of poorly sorted muddy sediments. Thus, ecological effects are likely to be of limited extent because of the low natural biological productivity. In developed areas, sand beaches are considered sensitive because of their high recreational use. During small spills, oil will concentrate in a band along the swash line. Maximum penetration into fine-grained sand will be less than 15 centimeters; penetration in coarse sand can reach 25 centimeters or greater. Clean sand can bury oiled layers quickly, creating more difficult cleanup issues. On heavily used recreational beaches, extensive cleanup is usually required to remove as much of the oil as possible. When large amounts of sediment must be removed, it may be necessary to replace these sediments with clean material. Traffic on sand can push oil deeper. 58 5 A N P C Berm 'lop SZOI Swaoh Large Waves Line Near- shore Zone of Normal Dar Water Level Sul7merged Zone Change 59 Table 20. Relative environmental impact from response methods for SAND habitats (ESI = 4). Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils Ddbris-Remdval' A A A Natural Recovery A A B B Flooding B A A B Sorbents A A B Manual'011 Removal/Cleaning D B A A Mechanical Oil Removal D B B A Low-Pressure, ColdwWater Flushing B B B B Vacuum B B B Sediment Reworking, D B B B Nutrient Enrichment B B C Shoreline Cleaning Agents B B Solidifiers B B In.-Situ Burning, B B Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D C C B 'High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing D D D D High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D D D D Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment Natural Microbe Seeding I I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A = May cause the least adverse habitat impact. B-= May cause some adverse habitat impact. C = May cause significant adverse habitat impact. D = May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I = Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. =Not applicable for this oil type. 60 RESPONSE METHODS: SAND HABITATS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Debris Remoual Degree of oiling that warrants debris removal and disposal depends on use by humans and sensitive resources Natural Recouerg o Lower impact for small spills, lighter oil types, and remote areas Floo(ling � Only effective when the oil is fluid and on the sand surface, rather than penetrated or buried � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment � Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Sorbents 0 Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate Physical removal rates of heavy oils will be slow, so less oil will be mobilized for recovery by sorbents Overuse results in excess waste generation Some Adverse Habitat Impaet Manual Oil RernouallCleaning � Minimizes sediment removal and problems of erosion and waste disposal � Effective when oil is mostly on the surface, not buried beneath clean sand � Gasoline tends to quickly evaporate; therefore habitat disruption, worker safety concerns, and waste generated by manual cleanup are not balanced by benefits in removing oil Mechanical Oil Rernoual � Tends to remove large amounts of clean sand with the oiled sand � Use on high-use beaches where rapid removal of oil is required and where long stretches of shoreline are heavily oiled 61 Gasoline tends to quickly evaporate; therefore habitat disruption, worker safety concerns, and waste generated from mechanical cleanup are not balanced by benefits in removing oil Lotv-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing � Only effective when the oil is fluid and adheres loosely to the sediments � Optimize pressure to minimize the amount of sand washed downslope Vacuum � Early use of vacuum on pooled, liquid oil can prevent deeper penetration � Will minimize amount of sorbent waste when used with flushing efforts � Can vacuum heavy, non-sticky oil from sand substrates completely, but slowly Sediment Reworking � Appropriate for lightly oiled and stained sediments, to speed removal rates, and as a final step to polish recreational beaches � Because gasoline tends to quickly evaporate, habitat disruption, worker safety concerns, and waste generated from sediment reworking are not balanced by benefits in removing oil Nutrient Enrichment � Potentially effective for lighter oils that leave thin residues; less effective for thick, weathered oil residues � May be concern about nutrient overloading in poorly flushed areas � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate Shoreline Cleaning Agents � May be only technique to remove viscous oils without removing sediment � Individual products vary in their toxicity and ability to recover the treated oil Solidifiers � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate � Early use may prevent pooled oil from penetrating deeper � Not effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil 62 In-Situ Burning � Can effectively remove pooled surface oil accumulations � Concerns about air pollution, physical nature of the residue, and thermal impact on biota � May have to dig trenches to accumulate oil in pools � Lighter oils will penetrate the sand, leaving insufficient surface concentrations to burn Probable Adverse Habitat Impaet Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing � May be needed to soften and lift sticky oil off the sand surface � Any organisms present will be adversely affected by hot water Most Adverse Habitat Impaet I ligh-Pressure, Cold-Woter Flushing And High-pressure, Hot-Water Flushing 0 High-pressure water jets will fluidize sand-sized sediments, erode the beach, and wash the oiled sediment into nearshore habitats Insuffleient information chemical Shoreline Pretreatment o More information needed on available products, their effectiveness, and impact Natural Microbe Seeding There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness in freshwater habitats 63 3.9 MIXED SAND AND GRAVEL HABITATS (ES1 = 3, 5) HaNtat Description Mixed sand and gravel habitats are characterized by a substrate that is composed predominantly of a mixture of sand- to cobble-sized sediments (see Appendix B for grain sizes). These habitats may vary from a well-sorted cobble layer overlying finer-grained (sand-sized) sediments to mixtures of sand, pebble, and cobble. Typically, well-sorted beaches are exposed to some wave or current action that separates and transports finer- grained sediments; however, the sediment distribution does not necessarily indicate the energy at a particular shoreline. On depositional beaches multiple berms can be formed at the different water levels generated during storms. In glaciated areas, the gravel component can include very large boulders. Natural replenishment rates are very slow for gravel, compared to sand. Mixed sand and gravel habitats occur as beaches along the Great Lakes and as point bars along rivers and streams. .sensitiuity Mixed sand and gravel habitats have medium sensitivity to oil spills. Biological communitIies are very sparse because of sediment mobility, desiccation, and low organic matter. Most invertebrates living in this habitat are deep burrowers, such as some oligochaete worms and insect larvae. Characteristic insects are mayflies, stoneflies, caddisflies, and midges, although mayflies and stoneflies are scarce or absent where silt is present. The nearshore habitat is used by fish for spawning and protects fry and larvae. There are also limited numbers of birds and mammals. Viscous oils reaching these habitats may not penetrate into the sediments because the pore spaces between sediments are filled with sand. Therefore, deep oil penetration and long-term persistence are lower than on gravel substrates. However, oil can still occur at depths below those of annual reworking, particularly if the oil is deposited high on the beach out of the reach of normal wave activity or is rapidly buried. Erosion can be a concern when large quantities of sediment are physically removed. In more sheltered areas, asphalt pavements can form if heavy surface oil deposits are not removed. Once formed, these pavements are very stable and can persist for years. 64 MIXED SAND and GRAVEL '41 Sand Berm mail Cusps zn_ Scarp t Small Waves and m Grave Gravel Sand, Gravel Zone of Zone of Normal :-.6-Storm Water Level 10 4 Submerged Zone 'U4 Change 65 Table 21. Relative environmental impact from response methods for MIXED SAND and GRAVEL habitats (ESI = 3, 5). Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils Removal A A A Flooding A A A C Natural Recovervy A A B B Low-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing B A A B rb So ents A A B Vacuum B B B Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning D B A A Sediment Reworking D B B B MechanicalOlf Removal D C 8 B Shoreline Cleaning Agents B B Nutrient Enrichment B B C In-Situ Burning B B SolidifiOrs B High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing C C C C Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D C C B High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D D D D Steam Cleaning D D D Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment I I I Natural Microbe Seeding I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A = May cause the least adverse habitat impact. B = May cause some adverse habitat impact. C = May cause significant adverse habitat impact. D = May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I =Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. =Not applicable for this oil type. 66 RESPONSE METHODS: MIXED SAND AND GRAVEL HABITATS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet 1_)ebris Rernoual Degree of oiling that warrants debris removal and disposal depends on amount of use by humans and sensitive resources Flooding � Most effective when the oil is fluid and adheres loosely to the sediments � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment Natural Recouffg 0 Least impact for small spills, lighter oil types, and remote areas Low-1-1ressure, Cold-Water Flushing � Most effective when the oil is fluid and adheres loosely to the sediments � Excessive pressures can cause erosion � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment � Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Sorbents � Overuse generates excess waste � Useful for recovering sheens, even for gasoline spills � Physical removal rates of heavy oils will be slow, so less oil will be mobilized for recovery by sorbents Some Adverse Habitat Impaet Vacuum 0 Early use of vacuum on pooled, liquid oil can prevent deeper penetration Manual Oil RemouallCleaning Gasoline tends to evaporate quickly; therefore manual cleanup causes habitat disruption, worker safety concerns, and generates waste with no benefits due to removing oil 67 � Minimizes sediment removal and problems of erosion and waste disposal � Preferable when oil is mostly on the surface, not deeply penetrated or buried Se(Jiment wworking � Use to break up heavy surface oil or expose persistent subsurface oil deposits, particularly where sediment removal will cause erosion � Use where there is sufficient exposure to waves to rework the sediments into their original profile and distribution � Gasoline tends to evaporate quickly; therefore sediment reworking causes habitat disruption, worker safety concerns, and generates waste with no benefits due to removing oil Mechanical Oil Remoual � Tends to remove large amounts of sediment with the oil � Applicable for heavier oil types, which are difficult to remove otherwise � Gasoline tends to evaporate quickly; therefore mechanical cleanup causes habitat disruption, worker safety concerns, and generates waste with no benefits from removing oil Shoreline Cleaning Agents May be only technique to remove viscous oils without removing sediment Individual products vary in their toxicity and ability to recover the treated oil Nutrient Enrichment � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate � Potentially effective for lighter oils that leave thin residues; less effective for thick, weathered oil residues � Most applicable as a secondary technique after gross oil removal � Concerns about nutrient overloading in poorly flushed areas In-Situ Burning � Can effectively remove pooled surface oil accumulations � Concerns about air pollution, physical nature of the residue, and thermal impact on biota � May have to dig trenches to accumulate oil in pools � Lighter oils will not remain on the sediment surface Solidifiers 0 Early use may prevent pooled oil from penetrating deeper 68 0 Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate 0 May be useful in recovering sheens when deployed as booms and pillows 0 Not effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil 0 Could use for lighter oils with correct product and situation Probable Adverse Habitat Impaet I ligh-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing � High-pressure water jets will flush oiled sediments into nearshore habitats � Excessive pressures can cause erosion if large amounts of sand are present Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing � Any organisms present will be affected by hot water � Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Most Adverse Habitat Impaet I iigh-1 'ressure, Hot-Water Flushing 0 Will flush oiled sand into nearshore zone and affect any organisms present Steut n Cleaning � Highly intrusive technique; will kill any organisms present � Potential for released oil to penetrate deeper into the sediments Insuffleient Information C'hemical Shoreline Pretreatment Need more information on available products, their effectiveness, and impact Natural Microl)e Seeding There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness in freshwater habitats 69 3. 10 GRAVEL HABITATS (ESI = 6A) I laf)jtat T)escription Gravel habitats are characterized by a substrate that is composed predominantly of gravel-sized sediments. By definition (see the grain-size chart in Appendix B), gravel includes sediments ranging in size from granules (greater than 2 millimeters) to boulders (greater than 256 millimeters). The sand fraction on the surface is usually less than ten percent, although the sand content can increase to 20 percent with depth. These sediments are highly permeable because there are few sand-sized sediments to fill the pore spaces between the individual gravel particles. Gravel substrates may also have low bearing capacity and, consequently, may not support vehicular traffic. Typically, well- sorted beaches are exposed to some wave or current action that reworks the sediments and removes the finer-grained sedim ents. However, the sediment distribution does not necessarily indicate the energy setting at a particular shoreline; sheltered beaches can still have a large gravel source. In glaciated areas, the gravel can include very large boulders. On depositional beaches, zones of pure pebbles or cobbles can form into multiple berms at the different water levels generated during storms. Gravel shorelines tend to be steeper than those composed of sand or mud. Natural replenishment rates are very slow for gravel compared to sand. Gravel habitats occur as beaches along the Great Lakes and as bars along rivers and streams. sensitiuity Gravel habitats have medium sensitivity to oil spills. Biological communities are very sparse because of sediment mobility, desiccation, and low organic matter. Characteristic insects are mayflies, stoneflies, caddisflies, and midges, all with larvae living among the sediments. Flatworms, leeches, and crustaceans may be found on the gravel undersides. The nearshore habitat is used by fish for spawning and provides protection for fry and larvae. Gravel habitats are ranked higher in sensitivity than sand and gravel habitats because deep penetration of stranded oil into the permeable substrate is likely. Oil can penetrate to depths below those of annual reworking, resulting in long-term persistence of the oil. The slow replenishment rate makes removing oiled gravel highly undesirable. Also, formation of persistent asphalt pavements is likely where there is high accumulation of persistent oils. 70 R A V E L )-i r A._@A Doulders Storm Derm Small FeWes 10 J1 43 0 pebbles 0 arse Gra e I 5and, Gravel Zone of Usual Land Water Level I CoMAe / 13oulder --*- Change :-*-Platform Submerged Zone - (IncluglIne stormo) :(usually under water) 71 Table 22. Relative environmental impact from response methods for mixed sand'and gravel habitats (ESI = 3, 5). Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils Flooding A A A C . ... . .... . .. Debris Removal A A A A . .. . .... . . . ...... . Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning D B A A . . ...... . Sediment Reworking D B -B .13 . . . . . . . . . . . Shoreline Cleaning Agents B B Nutrient Enrichment B B C Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D C C B . ........ ..C High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D D D D . . ....... ...... . n Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment ..... . ... .... . ....... ..... . . M060o t h Me._me "tit ........... specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: tadv- h t t B= May cause some adverse habitat impact. D May cause the most adverse haNtat impact. tt i t. . . .. .. me o z@Wu no U9 : S:@, 4" h thi'ik Id Not applicable for this oil type. 72 RESPONSE METHODS: GRAVEL HABITATS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Debris Rernoual Degree of oiling that warrants debris removal and disposal depends on use by humans and sensitive resources I LoW-Ilressure, Cold-Water Flushing � Only effective when the oil is fluid and loosely adheres to the sediments � Usually used in conjunction with vacuum and sorbents � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment Flooding � Only effective when the oil is fluid and adheres loosely to the sediments � Usually used with various flushing techniques � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment Natural Recouerg 0 Least impact for small spills, lighter oil types, remote areas, and eroding areas Sc)rhents � Overuse generates excess waste � Useful for recovering sheens, even for gasoline spills � Physical removal rates of heavy oils will be slow, so less oil will be mobilized for recovery by sorbents Some Adverse Habitat Impaet Vacuum Early use of vacuum on pooled, liquid oil can prevent deeper penetration I ligh-1 Ire,,3sure, Cold-Water Flushing � High-pressure water jet is likely to flush finer sediments into nearshore submerged habitats � Very viscous oils will require extremely high pressure to mobilize them 73 Nutrient Enrichment 0 Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate 0 Concerns about nutrient overloading in poorly flushed areas or where nutrient toxicity, especially ammonia, might be significant 0 Potentially effective for lighter oils that leave thin residues; less effective for thick, weathered oil residues Manual Oil RemouallCleaning � Gasoline tends to quickly evaporate; therefore manual cleanup causes habitat disruption, worker safety concerns, and generates waste with no benefits from removing oil . � Minimizes sediment removal and problems of erosion and waste disposal � Deep penetration of oil in porous gravel reduces effectiveness Sediment Reworking � Used where gravel removal is not feasible because of erosion concerns � Sufficient exposure to waves is required to rework the sediments into their original profile and distribution � Gasoline tends to evaporate quickly; therefore sediment reworking causes habitat disruption, worker safety concerns, and generates waste with no benefits from removing oil Stioreline Cleaning Agents � May be only technique to remove viscous oils without removing sediment or using hot-water flushing � Individual products vary in their toxicity and ability to recover the treated oil In-Situ Burning � Can effectively remove pooled surface oil accumulations � May have to dig trenches to accumulate oil in pools � Lighter oils will not remain on the sediment surface � Concerns about air pollution, physical nature of the residue, and thermal impact on biota Solidifiers � Early use may prevent pooled oil from penetrating deeper � Not effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil � May be useful in recovering sheens when deployed as booms and pillows 74 Probable Adverse Habitat impact Low-11'ressure, Hot-Water Flushing � May be needed to flush viscous or deeply penetrated oil � Any organisms present will be adversely affected by hot water Mechanical Oil Remouul � Likely to remove large amounts of gravel with the oil � Foot and vehicular traffic on gravel could mix oil deeper into the sediments Most Adverse Habitat Impact I ligh-1 Iressure, Hot-Water Flushing � High-pressure water jets are likely to flush oiled sediments into nearshore submerged habitats � Any organisms present will be adversely affected by hot water and high pressure Steam Cleaning � Highly intrusive technique; will kill any organisms present � Potential for released oil to penetrate deeper into the porous sediments Insufficient Information Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment 0 Need more information on available products, their effectiveness, and impact Natural Microbe Seeding There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness in freshwater habitats 75 .3. VEGETATED SHORELINE HABITATS (ESI = 9A) I luNtut 1_)escription Vegetated shoreline habitats consist of the non-wetland vegetated banks that are common features of river systems and lakes. Bank slopes may be gentle or steep, and the vegetation consists of grasses, bushes, or trees common to the adjacent terrestrial habitats. The substrate is not water-saturated and can range from clay to gravel. The banks may flood seasonally and are exposed to relatively high-energy removal processes, at least periodically. Along undeveloped shorelines, there can be leafy litter and woody debris trapped among the vegetation. In developed areas, yards and gardens may abut the lake or river. Sensitiuity Vegetated shoreline habitats are considered to have medium to high sensitivity to oil spills. They are not particularly important habitats for sensitive animals and plants, although many animals use vegetated banks for drinking, washing food, crossing bodies of water, and feeding. Bank plants oiled during a flood period could be susceptible, especially if the flood rapidly subsides, allowing oil to penetrate into bank sediments and to contact root systems. Small plants, particularly annuals, are likely to be most damaged. Stranded oil could remain in the habitat until another flood reaches the same level and provides a mechanism for natural flushing. On steep banks, the oil is likely to form a band, or multiple bands, at the waterline. On gentle banks, there is a greater potential for oil to accumulate in pools, penetrate the substrate, and coat large areas of vegetation, thus raising the issue of shoreline cleanup. In developed urban and suburban areas, human use and aesthetics would be the main reasons for cleanup. 76 VEGETATED RIVERBAN K5 k4,; Aa, .......... . .. IN 7z: - S Floo4 Water Level r m, at Water Level sand, Gravel ... am ravel ..... . .... sanj Flood Flood .0 Channel VA @rq- Plain Plain 77 Table 23. Relative environmental impact from response methods for VEGETATED SHORELINE habitats (ESI = 9A). Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils Natural Recovery A A B B Flooding B A A B Low-pressure, Cold-Water Flushing B A A B Sorbents A B B Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning D B B B Debris Removal B B B vacuum B B B Vegetation Removal D B B B Nutrient Enrichment B B B In-Situ Burning B B B High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing D C C D Mechanical Oil Removal D C C C Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D D D D High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D D D D Sediment Reworking D D D D Solidifiers - D D Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment - I I I Shoreline Cleaners - I I I Natural Microbe Seeding - I I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A = May cause the least adverse habitat impact. B = May cause some adverse habitat impact. C = May cause significant adverse habitat impact. D = May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I = Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. = Not applicable for this oil type. 78 RESPONSE METHODS: VEGETATED SHORELINE I IABITATS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Natural Recouerg � Low impact for small or moderate-size spills and lighter oils � More impact for large spills of medium- or high-viscosity oils Floodin(I � Operationally difficult and marginally effective for steep banks � Appropriate for gentle banks where persistent oil has pooled, assuming that the released oil can be directed towards recovery devices or sorbents � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment � Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Low-11'ressure, Cold-Water Flushing 0 Effective for washing oil stranded on the banks into the water for recovery 0 Vegetation cover minimizes the potential for sediment erosion from flushing 0 Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment 0 Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Some Adverse Habitat Impaet Sorhcnts � Useful fo r recovering sheens, even for gasoline spills � Physical removal rates of medium and heavy oils will be slow, so less oil will be mobilized for recovery by sorbents � Overuse generates excess waste Manual Oil ReMouuilCleaning 0 Some mixing of oil into the substrate and trampling of vegetation is unavoidable with foot traffic in oiled areas 0 Gasoline tends to quickly evaporate; therefore habitat disruption, worker safety concerns, and waste generated by manual cleanup are not balanced by benefits in removing oil 79 Debris Remoual � Degree of oiling that warrants debris removal and disposal depends on use by humans and sensitive resources � Minimal concerns where substrate is firm or work is conducted from boats vacuum � Potential damage where substrate will not support vehicular traffic � Most effective where access is good and substrate can support vehicles � Only useful when oil is pooled Vegetation Remoual � Usually not necessary to reduce oil impact on vegetation � May be required in areas used by sensitive animals Nutrient Enrichment � Applicable where nutrients are a limiting factor for oil degradation � More effective after gross oil removal is completed � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate In-.Situ Burning � May be the least physically damaging means of oil removal from the banks � Least impact for grassy areas versus banks covered with trees and shrubs Probable Adverse Habitat ImPaet High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing � High-pressure water spray will disturb plants and erode sediments � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residu-al oil in the environment � Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Mechanical Oil Remoual Excessive physical disruption likely from use of equipment Most Adverse Habitat ImPaet Lou;-I-Ire-,;sure, Hot-Water Flushing 0 Hot water could kill plants and potentially erode and degrade habitat 80 I ligh-rlre-ssure, Hot-Water Flushing Combination of high pressure and hot water poses high risk of sediment and vegetation loss Sediment Reworking 0 Will result in extensive habitat disruption Solidifiers � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate � Application of loose particulates may impede removal of oil mixed with, and adhered to, vegetation, litter, and debris � May be useful in recovering sheens when deployed as booms and pillows � Not effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil or penetrate netting or fabric encasing the loose particulates Insuffleient Information Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness in freshwater vegetation Shoreline Cleaning Agents � More information needed on available products, their effectiveness, and impact of use on vegetated bank habitats � Individual products vary in their toxicity and ability to recover the treated oil Natural Microbe Seeding There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness in freshwater vegetated shorelines 81 3.12 MUD HABITATS (ESI = 9B) H(ibitat Description Mud habitats are characterized by a substrate composed predominantly of silt and clay sediments, although they may be mixed with varying amounts of sand or gravel (see Appendix B for grain-size chart). The sediments are mostly water saturated and have low bearing strength. In general, mud shorelines have a low gradient, although some steep banks also may consist of mud. The mud habitats generally are low energy and sheltered from wave action and high currents. Adjacent nearshore areas are usually shallow with muddy sediments. These fine-grained habitats often are associated with wetlands; Section 3.13 discusses habitats where aquatic vegetation dominates. Bare or sparsely vegetated mud substrates are rare along Great Lake shorelines. However, they commonly occur along river floodplains and lake bottoms, where they can be exposed during seasonal low water levels. Sensitivitg Mud habitats are highly sensitive to oil spills and subsequent response activities. Shoreline sediments are likely to be rich in organic matter and support an abundance of infauna. Muddy habitats are important feeding grounds for birds and rearing areas for fish. Oil will not penetrate muddy sediments because of their low permeability and high water content, except through decaying root and stem holes or animal burrows. There can be high concentrations and pools of oil on the surface. Natural removal rates can be very slow, chronically exposing sensitive resources to the oil. The low bearing capacity of these shorelines means that response actions can easily leave long-lasting imprints, cause significant erosion, and mix the oil deeper into the sediments. When subsurface sediments are contaminated, oil will weather slowly and may persist for years. Response methods may be hampered by limited access, wide areas of shallow water, fringing vegetation, and soft substrate. 82 M U D f VY/ .... . ....... Mud Flat - - ---- -77, Mud Shallow Water Mud Flat Mud 1 Zone of Normal Water Level Change 10 ;-.4 Sul@merged Zone 01 83 Table 24. Relative environmental impact from response methods for MUD habitats (ESI = 913). Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils Natural Recovery A A A B Flooding B A A A Sorbents B A A B Debris Removal B B B vacuum G B B In-Situ Burning C C C C Low-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing D C C C Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning D D C C Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D D C C Solidifiers D D C Mechanical Oil Removal D D D D High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing D D D D High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D D D D Sediment Reworking D D D D Shoreline Cleaning Agents D D D Natural Microbe Seeding I I I Nutrient Enrichment I I I Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment I I I I The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A = May cause the least adverse habitat impact. B = May cause some adverse habitat impact. C = May cause significant adverse habitat impact. D = May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I =Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. =Not applicable for this oil type. 84 RE'SPONSE METHODS: MUD HABITATS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Natural Recoverg � Least impact for small spills and lighter oils, to prevent disruptions associated with cleanup efforts � For large spills or heavy oils, expect long-term persistence in low-energy settings 17loo(lino � Effective only for fresh, fluid oils � Local topography may limit the ability to control where the water and released oil flow and effectiveness of recovery � Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Sorho i ks � Useful as long as the oil is mobilized and recovered by the sorbent � Overuse generates excess waste � Careful placement and recovery is necessary to minimize substrate disruption Some Adverse Habitat Impaet lwhris Vernoval � Degree of oiling that warrants debris removal and disposal depends on use by sensitive resources � Extensive disruption of soft substrate likely Vwuutn 0 Not applicable to gasoline spills because of safety concerns 0 Use to remove oil pooled on the surface 0 Avoid digging trenches to collect oil because they can introduce oil deeper into the sediment 0 Disruption of soft substrates can be limited by placing boards on the surface and controlling access routes Probable Adverse Habitat Impaet In-Situ Buming Heat may impact biological productivity of habitat, especially where there is no standing water to act as a heat sink on top of the mud 85 Low-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing 9 Mud is readily suspended if substrate is not firm 0 Not effective for higher-viscosity oils that will not move with low pressure 0 Local topography may limit the ability to control where the water and released oil flow and effectiveness of recovery 0 Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Manual Oil RemouallCleaning 9 Use where persistent oil occurs in moderate to heavy amounts, or where sensitive resources must be protected * Response crews may trample soft substrates, mix oil deeper into the sediments, and contaminate clean areas Low-11'ressure, Hot-Water Flushing Physical and thermal impacts to habitat likely Most Adverse Habitat Impaet Solidifiers � High likelihood of disruption and mixing of oil deeper into the substrate during application and retrieval � Not effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil Mechanical Oil Rernoual � Soft substrate will not support vehicular traffic � Will probably cause extensive physical habitat disruption High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing and High-Pressure, Hot-Woter Flushing 0 High-pressure water will cause extensive sediment suspension and erosion 0 Potential for burial of oiled sediments and transport of oil to adjacent areas Sediment fieworking � Will extensively disrupt physical habitat � Increases oil penetration, burial, and persistence 86 Shoreline Cleaning Agents � Current products are designed for use with high-pressure flushing; since used with flushing, water pressure needs to be considered � Individual products vary in their toxicity and ability to recover the treated oil Insufficient Information Natural Microbe Seeding and Nutrient Enrichment � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate � There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness in mud habitats (:hemical Shoreline Pretreatment There is insufficient information about direct toxicity of the products, disturbances resulting from application and retrieval, effectiveness, and net benefit 87 3.13 WETLAND HABITATS (ESI = I OA, I OB) Habitat Description Wetlands are characterized by water, unique soils that differ from adjacent upland areas, and vegetation adapted to wet conditions. Wetlands include a range of habitats such as marshes, bogs, bottomland hardwood forests, fens, playas, prairie potholes, and swamps. Substrate, vegetation, hydrology, seasonality, and biological use of inland wetlands are highly variable, making characterization difficult. The surfaces of wetlands usually have a low gradient and vegetated areas are typically at or under the water level. There can be distinct channels or drainages with flowing water, except at the exposed outer fringe; however, natural physical processes are minimal. Water levels may vary seasonally, and the wetland may be simply a zone of water-saturated soils during the dry season. Where mud habitats dominate the wetland, refer to Section 3.12 for a discussion of applicable response methods. Sensitiuity Wetlands are highly sensitive to oil spills, The biological diversity in these habitats is significant and they provide critical habitat for many types of animals and plants. Oil spills affect both the habitat (vegetation and sediments) and the organisms that directly and indirectly rely on the habitat. Surprisingly little is known about oil impact on freshwater plants, although there are likely differences between robust perennials with substantial underground systems and cycles of winter die-back, and annuals that lack underground nutrient reserves. Detritus-based food webs are fundamentally important in wetlands; oil could possibly affect these by slowing decomposition rates of plant material. Wetlands support populations of fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals, with many species reliant upon wetlands for their reproduction and early life stages when they are most sensitive to oil. Many endangered animals and plants occur only in wetlands, and spills in such areas would be of particular conservation concern. Migratory waterbirds depend heavily on wetlands as summer breeding locations, migration stopovers, and winter habitats. The threat of direct oiling of animals using the wetland often drives efforts to remove the oil. If oil and/or cleanup efforts causes a loss of the more sensitive plants or modifies the ecosystem structure, then feeding and breeding of dependent wildlife may be affected. 88 W E T L A N P 5 swamp 0 Marsh RI s iq 3 Flood Water Level or Level Normal Wat 11 J >,- A 0 Organic. I r03nIc .. ... ...... Muddy5and MU Water- logged Submerged Open Channel io :--*Submerged -.P- 89 Table 25. Relative environmental impact from response methods for WETLAND habitats (ESI 10A, 1 OB). Gasoline Diesel- Medium Heavy Response Method Products Like Oils Oils Oils Natural Recovery A A A B' Sorbents C A A A flooding B A A B Low-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing B A A B An.situBurning B B B B Vacuum B B B Debris Removal B B B Vegetation Removal D C C C Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning D D C C High+ressure, Cold-Water Flushing D D D D Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D D D D High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing D D D D Mechanical Oil Removal D D D D Sediment Reworking b D D D Solidifiers D D D Shoreline Cleaning Agents Nutrient Enrichment Natural Microbe Seeding Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment The following categories are used to compare the relative environmental impact of each response method for the specific environment or habitat for each oil type, using the following definitions: A = May cause the least adverse habitat impact. B = May cause some adverse habitat impact. C = May cause significant adverse habitat impact. D = May cause the most adverse habitat impact. I = Insufficient Information - impact or effectiveness of the method could not be evaluated at this time. = Not applicable for this oil type. 90 I-IES13ONSE METHODS: WETLAND HABITATS Least Adverse Habitat Impaet Natural wwovery � Least impact for small to moderate spills and lighter oils; avoids damage often associated with cleanup activities � Some cleanup may be warranted where large numbers of animals are likely to become oiled during wetland use Sorl)ents � Care is necessary during placement and recovery to minimize disturbance of substrate and vegetation � Overuse generates excess waste � Erosion of substrate and vegetation may be a problem � Can be used selectively to remove localized heavy oiling � Can be difficult to direct water and oil flow towards recovery devices � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment � Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats I-ow-1-Yessure, Cold-Woter Flushin. g � If water pressures are too high, the substrate and vegetation may be disturbed � Use on heavy oils is likely to leave large amounts of residual oil in the environment � Use on gasoline spills may transport the oil to more sensitive habitats Some Adverse Habitat Impaet lr)-,Situ Buming 0 May be one of the least physically damaging means of heavy oil removal 0 Presence of a water layer on marsh surface can protect roots 0 Time of year (vegetation growth stage) is important consideration 0 May be appropriate for gasoline spills trapped in ice Wwuurn 0 Can be effective in removal of pooled oil from the marsh surface 91 Trampling of vegetation and substrate can be limited by placing boards on the surface and limiting traffic 1)(,I)ris I?ernoual The removal of heavily oiled and mobile debris may reduce the tracking of oil off-site and contamination of wildlife Probable Adverse Habitat Impaet vegetation ReMoual � Used to prevent oiling of sensitive animals using the wetland � Most appropriate for oils that form a thick, sticky coating on the vegetation, such as medium and heavy oils � May delay recovery of the vegetation due to both oil impact and physical destruction by cleanup crews � Trampling of vegetation may be reduced by controlling access routes, using boards placed on surface, or conducting operations from boats Manual Oil RemouallCleaning � Used where persistent oil occurs in heavy amounts and where sensitive resources using the wetlands are likely to be oiled � Response crews may trample roots and mix oil deeper into the sediments Most Adverse Habitat Impaet High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing High-pressure spray will disrupt sediments, root systems, and animals Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing and High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushit)(I Hot water will likely kill the vegetation Mechanical Oil Rernoual � Using vehicles in soft substrate will probably cause extensive physical disruption � Can completely alter the marsh substrate, hydrology, and vegetation patterns for many years � Use in heavily oiled wetlands when all other techniques have failed and there is an overriding reason for oil removal 92 Sedir-nent Reworking 0 No benefit from mixing oil deeper into fine-grained and organic soils Solidifiers � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate � Use likely to increase adherence to vegetation and slow weathering/ removal rates of residual oil � Not effective on heavy oils, which are too viscous to allow the product to mix into the oil Insuffleient Information Sliorchne Cleaning Agents 0 More information needed on available products, their effectiveness, and impact of use on vegetated bank habitats * Individual products vary in their toxicity and recoverability of the treated oil Nutrient Enrichment and Natural Microbe Seeding � Not applicable to gasoline spills because they rapidly evaporate � Concerns include eutrophication and acute toxicity, particularly from ammonia, because of shallow waters and low mixing rates � There is insufficient information on impact and effectiveness in wetlands clietnical Shoreline Pretreatment There is insufficient information about product toxicity, disturbances resulting from application and retrieval, effectiveness, and net benefit 93 4.0 SPILL RESPONSE METHODS This section describes methods previously categorized for use during response to oil spills in inland environments and habitats. The methods are used in the protection, recovery, and cleanup phases of a response. The main objective of protection is to keep oil out of a habitat or to reduce the amount that enters. Recovery consists of removing floating oil from the water surface. The cleanup phase consists of removing stranded oil from shoreline habitats via physical, chemical, and enhanced biological means. In most spill response situations, protection and oil recovery are the immediate goals. Combinations of protection, recovery, and cleanup methods are commonly used though these guidelines treat each method separately. The following section includes a summary of the objective in using the method, a general description of the method, applicable habitat types, conditions under which the methods should be used, biological constraints commonly applied to the use of the method to protect sensitive resources, and the environmental effects expected from the proper use of the method. Some of the methods listed require special authorization for use during a spill; the appropriate agency must be contacted about the need for special approvals. We encourage you to refer to the references listed in Appendix A for further information. I 'hysh:aJ Response Methods 1 Natural Recovery 11 Sediment Reworking 2 Booming 12 Vegetation Removal 3 Skimming 13 In-Situ Burning 4 Barrier/Berm 14 Flooding 5 Physical Herding 15 Low-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing 6 Manual Oil Removal/Cleaning 16 High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing 7 Mechanical Oil Removal 17 Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing 8 Sorbents 18 High-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing 9 Vacuum 19 Steam Cleaning 10 Debris Removal 2D Sand Blasting 95 Chemical Response Methods 21 Dispersants; 25 Solidifiers 22 Emulsion Treating Agents 26 Chemical Shoreline Pretreatment 23 Visco-Elastic Agents 27 Shoreline Cleaning Agents 24 Herding Agents Biological Response Methods 28 Nutrient Enrichment 29 Natural Microbial Seeding .1. Natural Reeovery objective No attempt to remove any stranded oil in order to minimize impact to the environment, or because there is no proven effective method for cleanup. Description No action is taken, although monitoring of the incident continues. Applicable Habitat Types Can be used on all habitat types. When to Use On remote or inaccessible habitats, when natural removal rates are very fast (e.g., the evaporation of gasoline), when the degree of oiling is light, or when cleanup actions will do more harm than natural removal. Biological Constraints This method may be inappropriate for areas where high numbers of mobile animals (birds, terrestrial mammals) or endangered species use the body of water or shoreline. Environrnentol Effects Same as from the oil alone. 96 2. Booming ()I)j(-(:ti[)e To control the movement of floating oil by containment, diversion, deflection, or exclusion. l)(,Scrij)tjori Placement of a device (boom) on the water that forms a barrier to floating oil. Containment is deploying a boom to hold the oil until it can be removed. Deflection is moving oil away from sensitive areas. Diversion is moving oil toward recovery sites that have slower flow, better access, etc. Exclusion is placing boom to prevent oil from reaching sensitive areas. The ultimate goal is to recover the oil. Ap[Aicable I lubitat -I'gpes Can be used on all water environments. Booms begin to fail by entrainment when the effective current or towing speed exceeds 0.7 knots perpendicular to the boom. WIwn to Use Nearly all types of response to spills on water involve deploying boom to assist in the recovery of floating oil. Booms must be properly deployed and maintained, including removing accumulated debris. Containment booming of gasoline spills is usually not attempted, because of both fire and inhalation hazards to responders. However, when public health is at risk, booming of gasoline can be attempted with use of foam and extreme safety procedures. Deflection or exclusion booming of sensitive areas to prevent exposure to oil, including gasoline, can be an important protection action. Biolo(jicol Cor)straints Placement and maintenance of anchoring points should not cause excessive physical disruption. Boom must be maintained so that it does not trap oil improperly and cause more damage. Traffic to/from boom sites should not disturb wildlife. 1--'nuirorim(,ntol Eff('Os Minimal if surface disturbance by cleanup work force traffic is controlled. 97 I Skimming Objectiue To recover floating oil from the water surface. Description Mechanized equipment is placed at the oil/water interface. There are five different types of skimmers: weir, suction, centrifugal, submersion, and oleophilic. They may operate independently from shore, be mounted on vessels, or be completely self-propelled. All require collection and concentration of floating oil at the skimmer, usually using booms. Large amounts of water are often collected and must be handled. Adequate storage of recovered oil/water mixture must be available. Apr-)Ijcable Habitat Types Can be used on all water environments. Waves, currents, and debris reduce skimmer efficiencies. Wt)en to Use When sufficient amounts of floating oil can be contained. Skimming of gasoline spills is usually not feasible, because of both fire and inhalation hazards to responders. However, when public health is at risk, skimming of gasoline can be attempted using foam and extreme safety procedures. Biological Constraints Traffic to/from skimming sites should not disturb wildlife. Enuironmental Effects Minimal if surface disturbance by cleanup work force traffic is controlled. 4. BarrierslBerms To prevent entry of oil into a sensitive area or to divert oil to a collection area. Descrij-)tion A physical barrier is placed across an area to prevent moving oil from passing. Barriers can consist of earthen berms, filter fences, air bubble barriers, or trenches. When it is 98 necessary for water to pass, because of water volume or downstream needs, underflow dams (for low flow rates) or overflow dams are used. Applicable 11abitat -1-ypes In streams and dry valleys, where the width and depth of the area to be closed off are relatively small. Also, at the mouths of small creeks along lake shorelines, to prevent oil from being blown upstream. When to Use When the flow of oil threatens sensitive habitats. If the barrier does not fail, it is the most effective strategy to exclude oil from an area. Biological Constraints Place barriers away from sensitive areas, such as spawning sites. Downstream water requirements should be monitored to prevent dewatering of sensitive areas. Enuironmentol Ef ,fects May disrupt or contaminate sediments along banks or in channel. Dewatering or poor water quality downstream may affect aquatic organisms. 5. Physieal Herding 01)jective To free oil trapped in debris or vegetation on water; to direct the movement of floating oil towards containment and recovery devices; or to push oil away from sensitive areas. I)escription Water or air streams and propeller wash generate a current to dislodge trapped oil and herd the released oil to containment and recovery area. May mix oil with water to form emulsified oil. Aj)j)1jca1)1e I-labitot 'Fypes In lakes and ponds where there are little or no currents, along rivers and streams where the channel or banks are accessible, and in and around manmade structures such as wharves and piers. 99 When to Use In low-current or stagnant waterbodies, to herd oil in booms towards recovery devices. Along rivers and streams, when mobile. oil has penetrated vegetated banks or accumulated in log jams or other debris, water spray and prop wash can mobilize the oil to flow downstream to collection points. Biological Constraints None. Enuironmental Effects May generate high levels of suspended sediments and mix them with the oil, resulting in deposition of contaminated sediments in benthic habitats. 6. Manual 00 RemovaLlCleaning Objectiue To remove surface oil with hand tools and manual labor. Description Removal of surface oil by manual means (hands, rakes, shovels, buckets, rags, sorbent pads, etc.) and placing in containers. No mechanized equipment is used. Applicable Habitat Tgpes Can be used on all habitat types. When to Use Light to moderate oiling conditions for stranded oil, or heavy oils on water that have formed semi-solid to solid masses that can be picked up manually. Biological Constraints Foot traffic over sensitive areas (wetlands, floating vegetation, etc.) needs to be restricted or prevented. There may be periods when access should be avoided, such as during bird nesting. Environmental Effects Minimal if surface disturbance by crew movement and waste generation is controlled. 100 7. Neebanical oil Removal objeoiw, Removal of oil from water surface, bottom sediments, and shorelines with heavy equipment. I)escril)fion Oil and oiled sediments are collected and removed using backhoes, dredges, graders, bulldozers, draglines, etc. On land, the oiled material is pushed into piles and transported offsite for treatment/disposal. On water, the equipment is operated from shore or barges to recover large amounts of heavy or solidified oil. Ar)I)Iicable Habitat 'I-ypes On land, possible wherever there are surface sediments accessible to heavy equipment. On water, used in lakes, rivers, etc., where oil accumulates. When to Use When large amounts of oiled materials have to be collected and removed. Along shorelines, care should be taken to remove sediments only to the depth of oil penetration, which can be difficult with heavy equipment. Should be used carefully where excessive sediment removal may erode the beach. Will need special permission to use in areas with known cultural resources. 13iologicul Constraints Heavy equipment may be restricted in sensitive habitats (e.g., wetlands, soft substrate) or areas containing endangered plants and animals. Enuironmental Ef fiects The equipment is heavy, with many support personnel required. May be detrimental if excessive sediments are removed without replacement. All organisms in the sediments will be affected, although the need to remove the oil may make this response method the best overall alternative. Runoff from exposed oil and fine-grained oily sediments can affect adjacent bodies of water. 101 8. Sorbents 01)jective To remove floating oil by adsorption onto oleophilic material placed in water or at the waterline. Description Sorbent material is placed on the water surface, allowing it to absorb oil as it is released by natural processes. Forms include sausage boom, rolls, sweeps, pads, and snares. Efficacy depends on the capacity of the particular sorbent, energy available for liffing oil off the substrate, and stickiness of the oil. Recovery of all sorbent material is mandatory. Applicable Habitat 'I-ypes Can be used on any habitat or environment type. When to Use When the stranded oil is mobile and transport of oil is expected on or off the site. The oil must be viscous and thick enough to be released by the substrate and absorbed by the sorbent. Often used as a secondary treatment method after gross oil removal and in sensitive areas where access is restricted. Biological Constraints Access for deploying and retrieving sorbents should not affect soft or sensitive habitats or wildlife. Sorbent use should be monitored to prevent overuse and generating large volumes of waste. Enuirorimcntal Effects Physical disturbance of habitat during deployment and retrieval. When the sorbents are no longer effective, oil may remain in critical habitats during sensitive periods. 9. Vaenum objectjue To remove free oil pooled on the substrate or from the water in sheltered areas. Description A vacuum unit with a suction head recovers free oil. The equipment can range from small, portable units that fill individual 55-gallon drums to large supersuckers that are 102 truck-mounted and can lift large rocks. Can be used with booms and flushing systems to move the oil toward the suction head. Removal rates from substrates can be extremely slow. Applicable Habitat 1-gpes Any accessible habitat type. May be mounted on barges for water-based operations, on trucks backed to the recovery area, or hand-carried to remote sites. when to Use When free, liquid o11 is stranded on the substrate (usually in depressions), trapped in vegetation and is readily accessible, or concentrated on the water surface. Often used instead of skimmers for floating oil recovery. Usually requires shoreline access points. Used in recovery of gasoline spills only with special precautions such as: applying foam to suppress vapors, testing for flammable vapor, locating the vacuum truck a safe distance from spill, and venting the pump discharge safely. Biological Constraints Special restrictions should be identified for areas where foot traffic and equipment operation should be limited, such as soft substrates. Operations in wetlands need to be very closely monitored, with a site-specific list of restrictions. IL"nuironmental Effects Minimal if foot and vehicular traffic is controlled and minimal substrate is removed. 10. Debris Renmal objectiue To remove contaminated debris from the shoreline or water surface. I)escription Manual or mechanical removal of debris from the shore or water surface. Can include cutting up and removal of oiled logs. Applicable Habitat 'Fypes Can be used on any habitat or environment type where safe access is allowed. Mien to U,,;e 103 When driftwood and debris are heavily contaminated and provide a potential source of chronic oil release, an aesthetic problem, a source of contamination for other organisms in the area, or skimmer clogging problems. Biological Constraints Disturbance to adjacent areas should be minimized. Foot traffic over sensitive areas (wetlands, spawning grounds) needs to be restricted. May be periods when access should be restricted (spawning periods, large numbers of migratory waterbirds). Enuironmental Effects Physical disruption of substrate, especially when equipment must be deployed to recover a large quantity of debris. 11. Sediment Reworking objectiue To rework oiled sediments to break up the oil deposits, increase its surface area, and mix deep subsurface oil layers, which will expose the oil to natural removai processes and enhance the rate of oil degradation. I-)escription The oiled sediments are roto-tilled, dis.ked, or otherwise mechanically mixed using heavy equipment. Along lake shores, oiled sediments may also be pushed lower on the shore to enhance natural cleanup from reworking by wave activity. The process may be aided with high-volume flushing of grdvel. Applicable Habitat Tgpes On any sedimentary substrate that can support heavy equipment. Wlien to Use On sand to gravel beaches with subsurface oil, where sediment removal is not feasible (due to erosion concerns or disposal problems). Also where surface oil deposits have started to form pavements or crusts. Appropriate for sites where the oil is stranded above the normal water level. 104 13iolo(fical Constrairits Avoid use on shores near water intakes, fish-spawning areas, or near bird-nesting or concentration areas because of the potential for release of oil and oiled sediments into adjacent bodies of water. Enuironmental Effects Due to the mixing of oil into sediments, this method could further expose organisms that live below the original layer of oil. Repeated mixing over time could delay re- establishing organisms. Runoff from treated sites could contaminate downslope areas. 12. Vegetation Rval 01)jectiue To cut and remove oiled vegetation to prevent oiling of wildlife or chronic oil releases. Description Manual cutting of oiled rooted vegetation using weed eaters. Cut vegetation is raked up. Floating vegetation is removed either manually or mechanically. Applicable Hobitot Types Wetlands composed of emergent, herbaceous vegetation and floating aquatic vegetation. When to Use When the risk of oiled vegetation contaminating wildlife is greater than the value of the vegetation that is to be cut, and there is no less destructive method that removes or reduces the risk to acceptable levels. Biological Constraints Operations must be strictly monitored to minimize the degree of root destruction and mixing of oil deeper into the sediments. Access in bird-nesting areas should be restricted during nesting seasons. Enuirorimental Effects Vegetation removal will destroy habitat for many animals. Cut areas will have reduced plant growth. Along exposed sections of shoreline, the vegetation may not regrow, eroding and destroying the habitat. Trampled areas will recover much more slowly. 105 13. In-Situ Burning objectiue To remove oil from the water surface or habitat by burning. Description Oil floating on the water surface is collected into slicks at least 2-3 millimeters thick and ignited. The oil can be contained in fire resistant booms, or by natural barriers such as ice or the shore. On land, oil in the habitat is burned, usually when it is on a combustible substrate such as vegetation, logs, and other debris. Oil can be burned off non-flarnmable substrates using a bum promoter. On sedimentary substrates, it may be necessary to dig. trenches for oil to accumulate in pools thick enough to bum efficiently. Heavy and emulsified oils are harder to ignite and sustain an efficient bum, but are still burnable. Applicable Habitat Tgpes On any habitat type except dry muddy substrates where heat may impact the biological productivity of the habitat. When to Use On floating slicks, early in the spill event when the oil can kept thick enough (2-3 millimeters). On land, where there is heavy oil in sites not amenable or accessible to physical removal and it is important to immobilize the stranded oil quickly. In wetlands and mud habitats, a water layer minimizes impacts to sediments and roots. Many potential applications for spills in ice. Biologicai Constraints Large volumes of smoke are generated, and its effect on nesting birds and populated areas should be evaluated. Enuironmental Effects Temperature and air quality effects are likely to be localized and short-lived. Toxicological impact from burn residues have not been evaluated. There are few studies on the relative effects of burning oiled wetlands compared to other techniques or natural recovery, but the limited data indicate little impact of burning relative to natural recovery when the soils are saturated. 106 14. Flooding Objective To wash oil stranded on the land surface to the water's edge for collection. Description A perforated header pipe or hose is placed above the oiled shore or bank. Ambient water is pumped through the header pipe at low pressures and flows downslope to the water. On porous sediments, water flows through the substrate, pushing loose oil ahead of it (or floats oil to the water's surface) then transports the oil down the slope for pickup. Flow is maintained to remove the majority of free oil. Oil is trapped by booms and is recovered by skimmers or other suitable equipment. Applicable Habitat Types All habitat types. When to USe In heavily oiled areas when the oil is still fluid and loosely adheres to the substrate, and where oil has penetrated into gravel sediments. This method is frequently used with other washing techniques (low- or high-pressure, cold water). Biological Constraints Not appropriate where nearshore sediments contain rich biological communities. Environmental Effects Habitat may be physically disturbed by foot traffic during operations and smothered by sediments washed down the slope. Oiled sediment may be transported to shallow nearshore areas, contaminating them and burying benthic organisms. 15. Low-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing Objective To remove liquid oil that has adhered to the substrate or manmade structures, pooled on the surface, or become trapped in vegetation. Description 107 107 Ambient water is sprayed at low pressures (<50 psi), usually from hand-held hoses, to lift oil from the substrate and direct it to the water's edge for pickup. Can be used with a flooding system to prevent released oil from re-adhering to the substrate. Applicable Habitat Tgpes On heavily oiled substrates, riprap, and seawalls where the oil is still liquid. In wetlands and along vegetated banks where free oil is trapped in vegetation. When to Use Where free, liquid oil is stranded onshore or floating in very shallow areas. 13iological Constraints Not appropriate where nearshore sediments contain rich biological communities. May need to restrict use so that the oil/water effluent does not drain across sensitive habitats. Use from boats will prevent foot traffic in soft substrates and vegetation. Released oil must be recovered to prevent further oiling of adjacent areas. Enuironmental Effects If containment methods are not sufficient, contamination may be flushed into downstream areas. Some trampling of substrate and vegetation is unavoidable. 16. High-Pressure, Cold-Water Flushing Objectiue To remove oil that has adhered to hard substrates or manmade structures. Description Similar to low-pressure flushing except that water pressure is 100-1,000 psi. High- pressure spray will more effectively remove sticky or viscous oils. If water volumes are low, sorbents are placed directly below the treatment area to recover oil. Applicable Habitat Tgpes Bedrock, manmade structures, and gravel habitats. When tc) Use When low-pressure flushing is not effective at removing adhered oil, which must be removed to prevent continued oil release or for aesthetic reasons. When a directed water jet can remove oil from hard-to-reach sites. 108 Biological Constraints May need to restrict flushing so that the oil/water effluent does not drain across sensitive habitats. Released oil must be recovered to prevent further oiling of adjacent areas. Environmental Effects May drive oil deeper into the substrate if water jet is improperly applied. If containment methods are not sufficient, contamination may be flushed into downstream areas. Some trampling of substrate and vegetation is unavoidable. 17. Low-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing Objective To remove non-liquid oil that has adhered to the substrate or manmade structures, or pooled on the surface. Description Hot water (90'F up to 170'F) is sprayed with hoses at low pressures (<50 psi) to liquefy and lift oil from the substrate and direct it to the water's edge for pickup. Used with flooding to prevent released oil from re-adhering to the substrate. Applicable Habitat Types On heavily oiled bedrock, sand to gravel substrates, and manmade structures. When to Use Where heavy, but relatively fresh oil is stranded onshore. The strategy is to heat the oil to above its pour point, so it will flow. Less effective on sticky oils. Biological Constraints Avoid wetlands or nearshore sediments with rich biological communities. Use should be restricted so that the hot oil/water effluent does not contact sensitive habitats. Boat use will prevent foot traffic in soft substrates and vegetation. Released oil must be recovered to prevent further oiling of adjacent areas. 109 109 Environmental Effects Hot water'can kill all organisms in direct contact. If containment methods are not sufficient, contamination may be flushed into downstream areas. Some trampling of substrate and vegetation is unavoidable during the response. I& Higb-Pressure, Hot-Water Flushing objectiue To mobilize weathered and viscous oil adhered to surfaces. Description Hot water (90'F up to 170'F) is sprayed with hand wands at pressures greater than 100 psi. Used without water flooding, this procedure requires immediate use of vacuum or sorbents to recover the oil/water runoff. When used with a flooding system, the oil is flushed to the water surface for collection by skimmers or sorbents. Applicable Habitat Types Gravel habitats, bedrock, and manmade structures. When to Use When oil has weathered to the point that even warm water at low pressure no longer effectively removes oil, to prevent continued release of oil. To remove viscous oil from manmade structures for aesthetic reasons. Biological Constraints Use should be restricted so that the oil/water effluent does not drain across sensitive habitats (damage can result from exposure to oil, oiled sediments, and hot water). Released oil must be recovered to prevent further oiling of adjacent areas. Enuironrnental Effects All attached organisms and plants in the direct spray zone will be removed or killed, even when used properly. Oiled sediment may be transported to shallow nearshore areas, contaminating them and burying benthic organisms. 110 19. Steam Cleaning Objective To remove heavy residual oil from solid substrates. Description Steam or very hot water (170 F to 212 F) is sprayed with hand wands at high pressure. Water volumes are very low compared to flushing methods. Applicable Habitat Types Manmade structures such as seawalls and riprap. When to Use When heavy oil residue remaining on a shoreline needs to be cleaned for aesthetic reasons, and when hot-water wash is not effective. Biological Constraints Not to be used in areas of soft substrate, vegetation, or high biological abundance directly on or below the structure. Environmental Effects Complete destruction of all organisms in the spray zone. Difficult to recover all released oil. 20. Sand Blasting Objective To remove heavy residual oil from solid substrates. Description Use of sandblasting equipment to remove oil from the substrate. May include recovery of used (oiled) sand in some cases. Applicable Habitat Types Manmade structures such as seawalls and riprap. 111 When to Use When heavy oil residue is remaining on the shoreline, which needs to be cleaned for aesthetic reasons, and even steam cleaning is not effective. Biological Constraints Not to be used in areas of soft substrate, vegetation, or high biological abundance directly below or adjacent to the structures. Enuironmental Effects Complete destruction of all organisms in the blast zone. Possible smothering of downstream organisms with sand. When the used sand is not recovered, introduces oiled sediments into the adjacent habitat. 21. Dispersants Objectiue To remove floating oil from the water surface and disperse it into the water column, to reduce impact to sensitive shoreline habitats and animals that use the water surface. Description Specially formulated products containing surface-active agents are sprayed at concentrations of about 5 percent by volume of the oil onto. the slicks by aircraft or from boats. The products can be applied undiluted or mixed with water. The dispersants; reduce the oil/water surficial tension and decrease the energy needed for the slick to break into small particles and mix into the water column. Some turbulence is needed to mix the dispersant into the oil and to mix the treated oil into the water. Applicable Habitat Tgpes Open water and large rivers with sufficient depth and volume for mixing and dilution. When to Use When the impact of the floating oil has been determined to be greater than the impact of mixing of oil into the water column. Biological Constraints Use in shallow water could affect benthic resources. The potential impact of dispersed oil on water intakes should be thoroughly considered prior to use. 112 Environmental Effects May increase effects on water-column organisms, particularly plankton and larval fish. Dispersion will only be partially effective, so some water surface impact will still Occur. 22. Emulsion-Treating Agents Objective To break or destabilize emulsified oil into separate oil and water phases. Can also be used to prevent emulsion formation. Description Emulsion-treating agents are surfactants that are applied to emulsified oil at low concentrations (0.1-2 percent). They can be injected into skimmer reservoirs to break the emulsion to separate excess water from recovered oil. They also can be sprayed (similar to dispersants) directly onto slicks to break or prevent emulsions. Applicable Habitat Types On all water environments where emulsified oil is present. When to Use For recovered oil, where storage capacities are very limited, to separate the oil and water so that the water can be treated and discharged. On floating slicks, where emulsified oil can reduce skimmer efficiency. Biological Constraints There is insufficient information to evaluate at this time. Environmental Effects Because this is a new application approach, there are very few data available to evaluate environmental effects. Effective dosages are one to two orders of magnitude lower than dispersants. Environmental concerns regarding application to slicks are: how treatment might adversely change the physical or chemical properties of the oil; whether the oil will be more readily dispersed; and how the treated oil will behave upon contact with birds, mammals, and shorelines. 113 113 23. Viseo-Elastie Agents objectiue To impart visco-elastic properties to floating oil and increase skimming rates. Description Chemical agent is applied as a liquid spray or a slurry onto the oil in the proper dosage. Some mixing is required and is usually provided by the water spray during application. Treated oil is rendered visco-elastic, but still fluid, gelatinous, or semi-solid; there is no chemical change in the oil. The primary purpose is to increase the efficiency in skimmer removal rates while minimizing amount of water. Increases the recovery by drum skimmers, but can clog weir-type skimmers. Applicable Habitat Tgpes On all water environments where oil can be contained for recovery with skimmers. Not for use near wetlands or debris because of an increase in adhesive behavior of the treated oil. Wheri to Use When recovery efficiency of skimmers needs to be increased. Must be used with booming or other physical containment. Not for use on heavy oils, which are already highly viscous. Biological Constraints Not suitable for vegetated shores or where there is extensive debris mixed in the oil. Should be avoided when birds or other wildlife that may be more adversely affected by the treated oil cannot be kept away from the treated oil. Enuironmental Ef fects May enhance the smothering effect of oil on organisms. Therefore, the treatment should be considered only where recovery of the treated oil is likely. 114 24. Herding Agents To collect or herd oil into a smaller area and thicker slick in order to increase recovery. Also can be used to herd oil away from sensitive areas or used inside containment booms when it is necessary to move the boom. 1)e.Scrjr)tion Chemical agents, which are insoluble surfactants and have a high spreading pressure, are applied in small quantities (1-2 gallons per lineal mile) to the clean water surrounding the edge of a fresh oil slick. They contain the oil, prevent spreading, but do not hold the spill in place. Hand-held, vessel-mounted, or aircraft systems can be used. Must be applied early in spill, when oil is still fluid. AI)I)hcalk, I luNtat 'I'gjx@,; On all stillwater environments. Wiwi) to [Is(, Potential use for collection and protection. For collection, used to push slicks out from under docks and piers where it has become trapped, or in harbors, where the equipment is readily accessible for use early in the spill. For protection in low-current areas, use to push slicks away from sensitive resources such as wetlands. Not effective in fast currents, rough seas, or rainfall. Hiolo(fical (:otistrair)ts Not suitable for use in very shallow water or fish-spawning areas. I"twiromm,Wal Efftwts Direct acute toxicity to surface layer organisms possible, though available products vary greatly in their aquatic toxicity. 25. SolidUlers To change the physical state of spilled oil from a liquid to a solid to reduce impact of oil to shorelines. 115 Description Chemical agents (polymers) are applied to oil at rates of 10-45 percent, solidifying the oil in minutes to hours. Various broadcast systems, such as leaf blowers, water cannons, or fire suppression sys tems, can be modified to apply the product over large areas. Can be applied to both floating and stranded oil. Applicable Habitat Types All water environments, bedrock, sediments, and martmade structures. When to Use When immobilization of the oil is desired, to prevent refloating from a shoreline, penetration into the substrate, or further spreading. However, the oil may not fully solidify unless the product is well mixed with the oil, and may result in a mix of solid and untreated oil. Generally not used on spills of heavy oil because the product cannot be readily mixed into viscous oils. Biological Constraints Must be able to recover all treated material. Environmental Effects Available products are insoluble and have very low aquatic toxicity. Unrecovered solidified oil may have longer impact because of slow weathering rates. Physical disturbance is likely during application and recovery. 26. Cbemieal Sboreline Pretreatment Objectiue To prevent oil from adhering to or penetrating the substrate. Description Various types of film-forming agents or wetting agents are applied to habitats in advance of the oil to prevent oil adhesion and penetration. Application must occur just prior to stranding of the oil so tin-dng is critical. It should be noted that there are no products now being sold as shoreline pretreatment agents. Applicable Habitat Types Bedrock, sand and gravel habitats, and manmade structures. 116 Mier] to U'se When oil is projected to impact an applicable shoreline, particularly those that have high recreational or aesthetic value. However, lack of information on the availability, effects, and effectiveness of products greatly limits their use. 13iolo(lical Cons train t,,3 Unknown at this time but there are likely to be constraints based on product toxicity and persistence. [,- - tal Ef ,nuironryien fects Unknown at this time since there are no commercially available products. There are concerns about toxicity and smothering since these products could be applied directly on clean substrates. 2 7. Skoreline Cleaning Agents of)jeclive To increase the efficiency of oil removal from contaminated substrates. 1)(,.,-;cri[)tion Special formulations are applied to the substrate, as a presoak and/or flushing solution, to soften or lift weathered or heavy oils to enhance flushing methods. The intent is to lower the water temperature and pressure required to mobilize the oil from the substrate during flushing. Applicable Habitat 'I'ypes On any habitat where water flooding and flushing procedures are applicable. WI)en to Use When the oil has weathered to the point where it cannot be removed using warm to hot water. This approach may be most applicable where flushing effectiveness decreases as the oil weathers. Biolooical Constraints The released oil should be recovered rather than dispersed into the water colurrm. Use may be restricted where suspended sediment concentrations are high, near wetlands, and near sensitive nearshore resources. 117 Enuironniental Effects If more oil is dispersed into the water column, there could be more oil sorbed onto suspended sediments and transferred to nearshore habitats, particularly along sheltered shorelines. The toxicity of shoreline cleaners is similar to the toxicity of dispersants. 2& Nutrient Enriebment objectiue To speed the rates of natural microbial degradation of oil by adding nutrients (generally nitrogen and phosphorus). Description Nutrients are applied to the habitat in one of several methods: soluble inorganic formulations, which are dissolved in water and applied as a spray, requiring frequent applications; slow-release formulations, which are applied as a solid; and oleophilic formulations, which adhere to the oil itself and are sprayed directly on the oiled areas. Applicable Habitat Types Could be used on any habitat type where safe access is allowed and nutrients are deficient. When to Use On moderately to heavily oiled substrates, after other techniques have been used to remove as much oil as possible; on lightly oiled shorelines where other techniques are destructive or not effective; and where nutrients limit natural degradation. Most effective on diesel-type and medium oils that do not have large amounts of high molecular weight, slowly degrading components. Less effective where oil residues are thick. Not considered for gasoline spills, which will be completely removed by evaporation at faster timeframes than by microbial degradation. Biological Constraints Not suitable in shallow water or restricted waterbodies where nutrient overloading may lead to eutrophication, or where toxicity of nutrients, particularly ammonia, is of concern. Contact toxicity of oleophilic formulations may restrict areas of direct application. Toxicity tests should be evaluated carefully, as other chemicals in the product could be toxic to aquatic organisms. 118 E'twironmental EffeUs Very little information is available on effects in freshwater. 29. Natural Rierobe Seeding Objective To,speed the rates of n-dcrobial degradation of oil by adding live microbes with enhanced oil-degrading abilities. I)e,s(:rir)tion Formulations containing hydrocarbon-degrading microbes (usually with fertilizers) are added to the oiled area. The argument is made that indigenous microorganisms will be killed by the oil or will be slow to degrade the oil, so new microbial species need to be added to speed the process of biodegradation. Little information is currently available to show whether natural microbe seeding increases biodegradation more than nutrient enrichment alone. Ar)j)Ijcat)Ie Hubitut Could be used on any habitat type where safe access is allowed and additional microbes are needed. When to Use On moderate to heavily oiled substrates, after other techniques have been used to remove as much oil as possible; on lightly oiled shorelines where other techniques are destructive or not effective; and where existing microorganisms are not present or effective. Most effective on diesel-type and medium oils that do not have large amounts of high molecular weight, slowly degrading components. Less effective where oil residues are thick. Not considered for gasoline spills, which will evaporate faster than they would degrade. Hiolo(jiwl Constraints If product contains fertilizers, not suitable in shallow water or restricted bodies of water where nutrient overloading may lead to eutrophication, or where toxicity of nutrients, particularly ammonia, is of concern. Toxicity tests should be evaluated carefully, as other chemicals in the product could be toxic to aquatic organisms. 119 Enuironmental Effects Very little information is available on effects in freshwater. 120 5.0 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS This section summarizes the following selected topics of special concern in freshwater habitats: � Public health concerns; � Conditions under which oil might sink; � Oil behavior in ice conditions; � Oil behavior and cleanup in permafrost; and � Firefighting foam. 5.1 PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERNS The human-health concerns associated with oil spills entail risks to the public from exposure to the oil and to responders during cleanup activities. In freshwater areas, the risks of exposure of the public.are of special concern, because of the potential for contamination of public drinking water supplies and the proximity of populated areas to spill sites. Human-health risks from spilled oil occur along three potential pathways: ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation. Ingestion pathways include drinking contaminated water and eating tainted food (e.g., fish, birds, and mammals). Water intakes in relatively shallow lakes and rivers may be highly susceptible to contamination during oil spills. Response procedures may thus include temporarily closing the intakes, protectively booming the intake area, bringing on-line additional treatment equipment at the water-treatment plant, and/or monitoring water quality for the contaminants of concern. The low-molecular weight, aromatic compounds (benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene) are usually of greatest concern, because of their much higher water solubility, compared to the other compounds in oil. These four compounds usually represent 70-95 percent of the water-soluble fraction (typically about 25-40 ppm) in crude oils. Water-treatment plants that have granular activated carbon filtration systems can remove low levels of oil contamination, especially the aromatic compounds, which can cause taste and odor problems at very low concentrations. The potential for direct contact of oil on skin is greatest during cleanup, and measures should be taken to keep the public away from all spill response operations. Inhalation of volatile compounds from spills of crude oil and light, refined products poses a risk to the public in adjacent areas. However, these risks are greatest with long-term exposure. 121 Fire risks are mostly associated with volatile, refined products such as gasoline. Response operations at these spills must be conducted with caution. Often, the best response to spills of volatile products is to allow the product to evaporate, while diverting the slicks away from populated areas and sensitive habitats. 5.2 CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH OIL MIGHT SINK IN FRESH WATER Most oil spills result in floating oil slicks. There are very specific conditions that can cause an oil spill to sink rather than float in freshwater settings. I The oil has a specific gravity greater than 1.00 at the ambient temperature. Specific gravity is the ratio of the density of a material to freshwater. Although nearly all crude oils and most refined products have a specific gravity less than 1.00 and will therefore float, some of the residual refined products (e.g., very heavy fuel oils, a'sphalt) are so heavy that their specific gravity is greater than 1.00. Spills of these oils can sink immediately and flow along with the bottom currents or as droplets in the water column. However, very small changes in water density can refloat sinking oil. There have been several spills in the freshwater sections of a river where the oil originally sank and moved along the bottom. However, at the fresh/salt mixing zone, where the water density increased with salinity, some of the oil rose to the surface. In other spills, oil has been reported to sink with very cold temperatures at night, only to refloat after the water absorbs heat from the sun. 2 The oil has a specific gravity just under 1.00 but forms a very stable emulsion. Water-in-oil emulsions can contain up to 80 percent water, which increases the specific gravity accordingly. Also, during the emulsification process, some sediment can be incorporated into the emulsion, either from the suspended sediments in the water mixed into the oil, or those adhered to the floating slick. Only a very small amount of sediment is needed to sink oil. Usually residual refined products (e.g., No. 6 fuel oil, Bunker Q have a specific gravity of 0.99 or greater. 122 3 -rhe oil comes ashore, picks up sediment, and then is eroded from the shore. Medium and heavy oils can adsorb to sediment when they strand, making the mixture heavier than water. However, the oil/sediment mixture must be eroded from the shoreline, usually by waves, which tend to break up the oil slicks. The oiled sediment can be deposited in the nearshore zone, but as small tarballs or widely scattered contaminated sediment, rather than a layer of sunken oil. In some instances, the tarballs can stick to each other, forming a tar mat just offshore. 4 -rhe. oil is a blend of light and heavy refined products, and the light fraction is lost by evaporation. Many intermediate fuel oils are actually mixtures of No. 2 and No. 6 oils. If the spill conditions were such that the light oil component completely evaporated, and the heavy oil was particularly heavy, the weathered oil might sink. 5.3 OIL BEHAVIOR IN ICE CONDITIONS Several important differences in the behavior of spilled oil in ice conditions greatly reduce the effectiveness of response methods. For spills in water colder than the oil's pour point, the oil will quickly become viscous or tar-like. Even lighter, refined products can lose the ability to disperse and become non-coalescing, semi-solid, smooth, spherical particles that are difficult to recover. Weathering and loss by evaporation are slowed by low temperature, thickness of the slick, restriction of spreading, entrapment below the ice, and encapsulation in ice. When spilled on ice, oil may pool in depressions and cavities, or be transported across the ice by wind. In ice with a porous crystal structure, oil can penetrate the ice; diesel-like oils can penetrate freely and deeply, while heavy oils remain more on the surface. Oil on the ice surface can also be entrapped by growing ice. If a light cover of snow covers the oil on the ice, the increased absorption of solar radiation by the oil under the snow can result in daily melting and nightly re-freezing that can form an ice/oil/ice layer. Oil spills trapped beneath the ice will collect in the rough underside areas of the ice sheet. Entrapped oil will spread until it reaches an equilibrium thickness. The oil can become encapsulated within the growing ice sheet, where it will remain until spring thaw or when leads in the ice sheet form. During breakup, decaying ice increases in 123 porosity and decreases in strength. Oil spilled under or sandwiched between this ice will rise through the ice and collect on the ice surface. For oil spilled under the ice, there are new infrared and imaging techniques available to assist in location of thick oil pockets. Holes can be drilled in the ice at these collection points, and the oil removed by vacuum. When the oil is encapsulated in the ice, there are two options: remove the contaminated ice or delay recovering the oil until the spring thaw. The largest logistical issue with contaminated ice is separating the oil from large quantities of ice during the winter. In-situ burning and certain types of skimmers have been shown to be effective for removing oil in broken ice. 5.4 PERMAFROST In the polar regions of the world, where the average annual temperature is below O*C, the soil freezes permanently and is known as "permafrost." Permafrost can range in thickness from a few centimeters for recently frozen soil, to hundreds of meters thick for old permafrost. In truly Arctic regions, all soils are in the form of permafrost; at its edges, the permafrost may be discontinuous and depend upon the soil type. In the United States, permafrost exists only in Alaska and at high altitudes in northern mountains. For oil spills, the major areas of concern are the Alaskan North Slope and the Trans- Alaskan pipeline route. Ice is one of the most important components of permafrost. The continued existence of the frozen soil depends strongly on the insulating properties of the surface soil. During the summer months, the surface soil thaws, forming an active layer. The water in this layer remains in place, since the frozen subsurface is not permeable. Disturbing this surface-active layer (3-6 centimeters up to one meter in depth) can increase thawing of the subsurface and will result in surface slumping. It can take years for this disturbance to be healed. The active layer of the permafrost supports a wide variety of specialized Arctic fauna and flora. Disturbing plants in this layer could affect this habitat for decades. While the data are limited, there is evidence that tundra plants are very sensitive to oil effects. This vegetation, particularly moss and lichen, forms the principal food sources for many of the animals in permafrost regions. The sensitivity and issues of oil spill response in permafrost areas are similar to those for wetlands. It is best to allow the spill to recover naturally unless large areas have been 124 affected. Appropriate response methods for summer spills would include installing berms to prevent continued spread of the oil, vacuuming pooled oil, applying sorbents to recover pooled oil in areas of limited access, and manually removing heavily oiled soils. Nutrient addition may be considered following gross oil removal. During summer, foot traffic in the permafrost should be highly controlled; structures such as board walkways should be used when possible to minimize physical disturbance. Vehicle traffic should be prohibited. It may be necessary to build a gravel road to the spill site to provide adequate insulation to prevent thawing of the permafrost. In winter, vehicular transport over snow-covered permafrost can be conducted without concern of physical disruption, and conventional land-based response techniques can be used, including in-situ burning. 5.5 FIREFIGHTING FOAM When responding to spills involving petroleum and refined fuels such as gasoline, firefighters often apply foam to suppress vapors and reduce the potential of fire. If the spilled material is already burning, foams are used to extinguish petroleum-liquid fires because they separate the burning liquid from the air, effectively smothering the fire. There are five basic types of foam commonly used: 1. Protein Foams consist of hydrolyzed proteins plus stabilizing additives and inhibitors. 2. Fluoroprotein Foams (FP) are similar to protein foams but have a fluorinated surfactant additive to improve the resistance to fuel entrainment. They exclude air, and may form a thin film to suppress the evolution of fuel vapors. 3. Aqueous Film-Forming Foams AFFF) are synthetic foams made from fluorocarbon surfactants with additional stabilizers. AFFFs also exclude air and form thin aqueous films to suppress the evolution of vapors. 4. Film-Forming Fluoroprotein Foams (FFFP) are combinations of protein and film-forming surfactants and combine the characteristics of AFFF and Fl? foams. 5> Alcohol-Resistant Foams are specially formulated foams for application on alcohols and water-miscible flammable liquids. 125 Each of these foams is created by mechanical action that fills the foam bubbles with air. A fourth type of foam, Multipurpose Foam Compounds, is being developed since many gasolines are required to contain alcohol or polar additives (such as methyl t-butyl ether) to decrease automobile emissions. These additives are water-soluble and reduce the effectiveness of conventional foams used on gasoline fires. There are two environmental concerns with using firefighting foams. First, although the acute aquatic toxicity of these products is believed to be low, it has not been fully evaluated. Toxicity should be evaluated in terms of the likely dose expected from normal application rates and possible synergistic effects when combined with petroleum oils. Second, these products may alter the physical properties of the treated oil. Since most firefighting foams contain surfactants, the rate of dispersion of the oil may be increased if improperly applied or mixed due to currents, storms, or boat traffic. 126 APPENDIX A. APPLICABLE OIL SPILL RESPONSE TECHNOLOGY BIBLIOGRAPHY The following bibliography is not intended to be comprehensive, but instead provides a list of key references from which many other publications may be found dealing with spill response techniques, strategies, equipment, and effects. American Petroleum Institute. 1985. Oil Spill Response: Options for Minimizing Adverse Ecological Impacts. API Publ. No. 4398. Washington, D.C.: API. 84 pp. Amcrican Petroleum Institute. 1992. Petroleum in the Freshwater Environment, an Annotated Bibliography 1946-1983. API Publ. No. 4508. Washington, D.C.: API. 60 pp. American Petroleum Institute. 1993. Oil Spill Response in Freshwater Environments: Impacts on the Environment of Clean-up Practices. API Publ. No. 4567. Washington, D.C.: API. 58 pp. Bobra, M., P. Kawamura, M. Fingas, and D. Velicogna. 1987. Laboratory and mesoscale testing of Elastol and Brand M demoussifier: Proceedings of the 10th Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Programme Technical Seminar, June 9-11, 1987, Edmonton, Alberta, pp. 223- 241. Breuel, A. 1981. Oil Spill Cleanup and Protection Techniques for Shorelines and Marshlands. Park Ridge, New Jersey: Noyes Data Corporation. 404 pp. Cairns, J., Jr. and A.L. Buikema, Jr., eds. 1984. Restoration of Habitats Impacted by Oil Spills. Boston: Butterworth Publishers, 182 pp. CONCAWE. 1980. Disposal Techniques for Spilt Oil. Report No. 9/80. Den Haag, The Netherlands: CONCAWE. 52 pp. CONCAWE. 1983. A Field Guide to Inland Oil Spill Clean-up Techniques. Report No. 10/83. Den Haag, The Netherlands: CONCAWE. 104 pp. Environment Canada. 1976. A Bibliography on Freshwater Oil Spills. Publ. EE-21. Ottawa, Ontario: Research and Development Division, Environment Canada. 232 pp. Environment Canada. 1983. A Catalogue of Oil Spill Containment Barriers. Rept. No. EPS-3-EC-83-5. Ottawa, Ontario: Environmental Protection Service. A-1 Environment Canada. 1992. Oilspill SCAT Manual for the Coastlines of British Columbia: Procedures for the assessment of oiled shorelines and cleanup options. Regional Program Report 92-03. Edmonton, Alberta: Technology Development Branch, Conservation and Protection, Environment Canada. 245 pp. Exxon Production Research Co. 1992. Oil Spill Response Field Manual. Houston: Exxon USA. 193 pp. Fingas, Mervin, Wayne S. Duval, and Gail Stevenson. 1979. The Basics of Oil Spill Cleanup with Particular Reference to Southern Canada. En 40-311/1978. Ottawa, Ontario: Environmental Emergency Branch, Environmental Protection Service, Environment Canada. Hayes, M.O., J. Michel, and B. Fichaut, 1991. Oiled gravel beaches: a special problem. Proceedings of the Specialty Conference on Oil Spills Management and Legislative Implications, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 444-457. International Maritime Organization. 1982. IM01UNEP Guidelines on Oil Spill Dispersant Application and Environmental Considerations. IMO Special Publication. London: IMO. International Maritime Organization. 1988. Manual on Oil Pollution, Section II - Contingency Planning. IMO Publication No. 560. London: IMO. 48 pp. International Maritime Organization. 1988. IMO Manual on Oil Pollution, Section IV - Combating Oil Spills. IMO Publication No. 569 88.11E. London: IMO. 216 pp. International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation, Ltd. 1987. Response to. Marine Oil Spills. New York: State Mutual Books. 125 pp. Luchun, R.E. 1992. Open River Spills - Strategies and Tactics, A Primer. Proceedings of the Seminar on Physical Recovery of Oil Spills, RRT Region VI and Corpus Christi State University, Corpus Christi, Texas, Session VI, 20 pp. Michel, J., Miles 0. Hayes, Rebecca Hoff, Gary Shigenaka, and Debra Scholz. 1992. Introduction of Coastal Habitats and Biological Resources for Oil Spill Response. Report HMRAD 92-4. Seattle: Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 384 pp. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1993. Shoreline Countermeasures Manual-National Template: Seattle: Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 80 pp. plus appendices. A-2 National Research Council, 1985. Oil in the Sea: Inputs, Fates and Effects. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 601 pp. National Research Council. 1989. Using Oil Spill Dispersants on the Sea. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 335 pp. Newfoundland Offshore Burn Experiment. 1993. Newfoundland Offshore Burn Experiment. Special Publication of the NOBE Steering Committee. Ottawa, Ontario: Environment Canada. 79 pp. Owens, E.H. 1982. Canadian Inland Waters: Coastal Environments and the Cleanup of Oil Spills: Report EPS 3-EC-82-3. Ottawa, Ontario: Environment Canada, 33 pp. Owens, E.H., M.A. Cramer, and D.E. Howes. 1992. British Columbia Marine Oil Spill Shoreline Protection and Cleanup Response Manual. Victoria, British Columbia: Environmental Emergencies Branch, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. Owens, E.H., J.R. Harper, W. Robson, and P.D. Boehm. 1987. Fate and persistence of crude oil stranded on a sheltered beach. Arctic 40, Supplement 1, pp. 109-123. Regional Response Team, Federal Region 111. 1992. Shoreline Countermeasure Manual Template. Portsmouth, Virginia: Fifth Coast Guard District. 84 pp. plus appendices. S.L. Ross Environmental Research Ltd. 1991. Selection Criteria and Laboratory Evaluation of Oil Spill Sorbents: Update IV. Environmental Protection Series Report EPS 3/SP/3. Ottawa, Ontario: Environment Canada. 68 pp. Shulze, R. 1991. World Catalog of Oil Spill Response Products. Baltimore: Port City Press. Shigenaka, G. and N. Barnea. 1993. Questions about In-situ Burning as an Open-Water Oil Spill Response Technique. Report HMRAD 93-3. Seattle: Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 42 pp. Solsberg, L.B. and S.L. Ross. 1983. A Catalog of Oil Skimmers. Environmental Protection Series Report EPS 3-EP-83-1. Ottawa, Ontario: Environment Canada. 258 pp. Tramier, B. 1981. A Field Guide to Coastal Oil Spill Control and Clean-up Techniques. Report No. 9/81. Den Haag, The Netherlands: CONCAWE. 112 pp. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1978. Protection, Cleanup and Restoration Of Salt Marshes Endangered by Oil Spills - A Procedural Manual. EPA-600/7-78-220. Cincinnati: Environmental Protection Agency. 161 pp. A-3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1979. Manual of Practice for Protection and Cleanup of Shorelines: EPA-600/7-79-187. Cincinnati: Office of Research and Development. Two volumes. 240 pp. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1982. Manual of Practice - Chemical Agents in Oil Spill Control. EPA-600/8-82-010. Cincinnati: Office of Research and Development. Walker, A.H., J. Michel, G. Canevari, J. Kucklick, D. Scholz, C.A. Benson, E. Overton, and B. Shane. 1993. Chemical Oil Spill Treating Agents: Herding Agents, Emulsion Treating Agents, Solidifiers, Elasticity Modifiers, Shoreline Cleaning Agents, Shoreline Pretreatment Agents, and Oxidation Agents. Washington, D.C.: Marine Spill Response Corporation Technical Report Series 93-015. 108 pp. plus appendices. Warren Spring Laboratory. 1982. Oil Spill Cleanup of the Coastline - A Technical Manual. London: Department of the Environment. 72 pp. A-4 AI'I'EINDIX B. (MAIN-SIZE S(ALE Wentworth Grain Scale Phi Units* Diameter (Size Description) d (millimeters) Boulder -8 256 Cobble 76.2 -6 64.0 19.0 Pebble 4.76 -2 4.0 Granule -1 2.0 Very Coarse 0 1.0 Coarse 1 0.5 Medium 0.42 Sand 2 0.25 Fine 3 0.125 Very Fine 0.074 4 0.0625 Silt 8 0.00391 Clay 12 0.00024 Colloid -1092 d (mm) (From U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Center, Shore Protection Manual 1973) B-1 J L 3 6668 00004 2533