[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 1994)] [Unknown Section] [Page 0] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-2596] [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: February 4, 1994] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Environmental Restoration and Waste Management AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Notice of inquiry and request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is developing eligibility standards and funding criteria for the distribution of DOE discretionary funds to federally-recognized American Indian tribes by DOE's Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management (EM). Discretionary funds, pursuant to Section 646 of the DOE Organization Act, are awarded to Indian tribes to participate in DOE's remediation and management program for wastes produced as the result of its activities at its former and current weapons production facilities. Such participation relates directly to DOE's American Indian Tribal Government policy, pursuant to DOE Order 1230.2, recognizing a government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes. Because of the potential for broad interest, DOE is providing interested parties an opportunity for comment on issues related to the funding of Indian tribes who are directly affected by DOE activities. DOE invites written comment on the criteria development process before proposing guidelines. In addition, DOE will schedule public workshops at several of its sites. Announcement of the location, date, and time of the public workshops will be published in the Federal Register. At these workshops, tribes and other interested parties will have an opportunity to further discuss issues related to guidance. DATES: Written submissions on this notice of inquiry are due on or before June 1, 1994. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to Margaret Fernandez, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Office of Public Accountability (EM-5), U.S. Department of Energy, Room 5B-031, 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington DC 20585. FAX Telephone: (202) 586-0293. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Fernandez, at the address above, or by telephone at (202) 586-5821. I. Background In 1989, the Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management was established to address environmental problems at the Department's facilities. Many of the Department's past, present, and future activities potentially affect Indian tribes. Past activities of DOE involved the research and production of plutonium, uranium, and other hazardous substances. Present and future activities focus on the management and remediation of wastes produced as a result of the Department's production activities. Because DOE's activities may affect tribes in close proximity to DOE sites, the Department's policy is to consult with these tribes and support tribal environmental remediation programs. The fundamental goals of DOE's policy are to involve affected tribes in remediation activities, provide tribes safe access to and management of cultural and natural resources, and promote tribal economic competitiveness and self-sufficiency pursuant to administration policy and legal requirements. In the past, DOE discretionary funds have been distributed to Indian tribes primarily through planning grants. Planning grants have funded tribal environmental restoration and waste management programs to identify, analyze and take initiatives to address waste management and cleanup issues stemming from DOE sites and facilities. The Nez Perce Tribe, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, and the Yakima Indian Nation have received planning grants related to the Hanford site. As an alternative to planning grants, DOE has used cooperative agreements to fund tribal activities. A cooperative agreement requires greater involvement between DOE and the participant in negotiating and conducting the proposed activities. This involvement results in specific project milestones and products that ensure greater accountability. The Department has successfully employed cooperative agreements to implement hazardous materials emergency response programs, as occurred in the case of the Waste Isolation Pilot Project with the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and at the Hanford site with the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. Based on this experience, DOE intends to use cooperative agreements as the prime vehicle for tribal involvement in environmental remediation activities. In addition to the use of cooperative agreements, the government-to- government relationship between DOE and tribal nations may also be expressed through site-specific agreements, memoranda of understanding, and joint ventures. The amount of DOE discretionary funds available for tribal cleanup activities in the early years of the DOE environmental program was based on large projected budget increases. However, present and anticipated budget constrictions for the EM program only allow for moderate funding. As a result, the amount of funds available for tribal environmental management and cleanup activities has leveled, while the degree of involvement by tribes, and the number of tribes that want to be involved in remediation activities, continue to grow. Budget limitations, coupled with DOE's commitment to involve affected tribes in its cleanup and management activities, necessitate the development of standards and guidance for disbursement of DOE discretionary funds to tribes. These standards will require the development of criteria relating to eligibility and funding. Eligibility criteria would determine which tribes would qualify to enter into cooperative agreements with DOE. Funding criteria would determine the types of activities that are to be funded and the levels of funding. DOE acknowledges that eligibility and funding criteria may utilize similar factors. II. Discussion--Eligibility and Funding Criteria A. Eligibility Eligibility criteria would determine if a federally-recognized Indian tribe qualifies to enter into a cooperative agreement allowing tribal participation in DOE environmental remediation activities. The following considerations could be used to determine tribal eligibility: (1) Should a tribe be considered eligible if its legal interests arising from treaty, statutes, and case law are affected by a DOE hazardous waste site. (2) Should a tribe be considered eligible if its legal interests arising from treaty, statutes, and case law are affected by a DOE produced waste stream or transportation corridor which carries DOE hazardous wastes? (3) Should a tribe considered eligible if its cultural and natural resources are located on or in close proximity to a DOE hazardous waste site, DOE produced waste stream, or transportation corridor which carries DOE hazardous wastes? Please define cultural and natural resources. (4) Should a tribe be eligible if its reservation is located on or in close proximity to a DOE hazardous waste site, DOE produced waste stream, or transportation corridor which carries DOE hazardous wastes? (5) Should ``close proximity'' be limited to a geographically defined area in relation to a DOE hazardous waste site, DOE produced waste stream, or transportation corridor which carries DOE hazardous wastes (e.g., a geographic area of not more than 50 miles, 100 miles, etc., from a hazardous site)? (6) Should ``close proximity'' be defined to include more distant areas where actual or likely physical harm could occur as a result of a DOE hazardous waste site, DOE produced waste stream, or transportation corridor which carries DOE hazardous wastes? (7) What other factors should be considered in determining eligibility? B. Funding Once it is ascertained which tribes are eligible to enter into cooperative agreements with DOE, the next determination is what particular tribal activities should be funded and at what levels. The following considerations which could be used to determine tribal funding include: (1) Should a priority system be used to categorize activities by factors such as the following: (a) The degree of the threat or actual level of harm to a tribe (e.g., the greater threat of harm, the greater the priority, etc.); (b) Size of affected tribal population; and (c) Types of activities proposed, (e.g., a groundwater monitoring activity to ensure a safe drinking water supply versus the remediation of a cultural site). (i) Should activities that support tribal management of cultural resources receive greater priority than other activities? (ii) Should activities which would assist a tribe in becoming more economically competitive and self-sufficient receive greater priority than other activities? (2) Should the fact that a tribe was previously funded by DOE mean it should receive greater consideration than a tribe that has never been funded, or the opposite? (3) Should a tribe receive greater funding consideration for past participation in DOE activities that were well performed by the tribe? (4) Where possible, should tribes that coordinate and prepare a joint proposal receive more favorable consideration than proposals by individual tribes? (5) To what extent should proximity be taken into account in funding one tribe that can argue a greater degree of affectedness over another tribe? ``Affected'' is defined in this instance to apply to a tribe that faces a substantial environmental or health impact. III. Request for Submissions The criteria and other ideas raised in this Notice are suggestions for comment. Comments need not address all suggestions raised in this inquiry and can be limited to particular points. DOE welcomes additional comments on eligibility and funding criteria for Indian tribes. All written information provided by respondents will be available for public inspection at the Department of Energy, Freedom of Information Reading Room, room 1E-190, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, 20585, between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 1004.11 (1983), any person submitting information believed to be confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit a copy of the document in which information believed to be confidential has been deleted along with the confidential submissions. The Department of Energy will determine the confidential status of the information and treat it accordingly. Signed at Washington, DC., this 31st day of January, 1994. Thomas P. Grumbly, Assistant Secretary for Environmental Restoration and Waste Management. [FR Doc. 94-2596 Filed 2-3-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450-01-P