[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 1994)] [Unknown Section] [Page 0] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-4011] [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: February 23, 1994] _______________________________________________________________________ Part XI Department of Transportation _______________________________________________________________________ Office of the Secretary _______________________________________________________________________ National Service; Announcement of Request for Proposals; Notice DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Office of the Secretary National Service; Announcement of Request for Proposals AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation. ACTION: Notice of requests for proposals. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service (the ``Corporation'') offers support for national service activities designed to help address the Nation's human, educational, environmental and public safety needs. The President has urged all Federal agencies to incorporate national service into their Federal programs. The Department of Transportation will join the Corporation in its effort by supporting and promoting transportation-related national service programs. This request solicits proposals for transportation-related national service projects, and describes what kind of local service organizations might wish to apply. It also lists specific program areas in which DOT encourages proposals. DOT will evaluate all the proposals received. After programs have been selected, DOT may enter into a formal agreement to establish a partnership with their sponsors and include those programs as part of DOT's application to the Corporation for operating funds and for the funding of educational awards. FOR GENERAL INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul B. Larsen, Office of the General Counsel, telephone (202) 366-9161; or CDR Timothy Beltz, Military Assistant to the Secretary of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 366-5742. FOR INFORMATION ABOUT SPECIFIC PROGRAMS: Contact the persons indicated in the programs described in this announcement. SEND PROPOSALS TO: Mrs. Brenda L. Harris, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 7th Street, SW., room 9414, Washington, DC 20590. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS: March 23, 1994, 4 p.m. EST. Dated: February 16, 1994. Federico Pena, Secretary of Transportation. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 Programs and Purpose 1.3 General Program Requirements 1.4 Eligibility Requirements 2. Program Descriptions 2.1 Overview 2.2 Rehabilitation, Reclamation, and Beautification of Transportation-Related Facilities 2.3 Transit Ambassadors 2.4 Operation Lifesaver 2.5 Hazardous Materials Transportation Emergency Preparedness Assistance 2.6 Youth Traffic Safety Education Programs 3. Submission of Proposals 3.1 Content and Format for Proposals 3.2 Address, Number of Copies, Deadline for Submission 3.3 Coordination with State Community Service Plan 4. Selection Criteria 4.1 General Criteria 4.2 Priority Consideration 4.3 Priorities for Specific DOT Programs 4.4 Preferences Applying to Urban Youth Corps Programs 5. Funding 5.1 Direct Funding from DOT 5.2 National Service Corporation Funding 5.3 Matching Funds 5.4 Restrictions on Use of Federal and Corporation Funds Application Form for Proposals--Appendix A 1. Introduction 1.1 Background On September 21, 1993, the President signed into law the National and Community Service Trust Act (the ``Act''). The purpose of the Act is to engage Americans of all ages and backgrounds in community-based service to address the Nation's educational, public safety, human, and environmental needs. The Act establishes several different types of service programs designed to accomplish these goals, and establishes the Corporation for National and Community Service (the ``National Service Corporation'') to administer these programs. The service program that this Request for Proposals (``RFP'') addresses is the ``AmeriCorps'' program. The AmeriCorps program will enable dedicated individuals to work on a variety of community and national service programs on a full-time or part-time basis for a period of at least nine months. In exchange for their contribution, participants will receive living stipends and, at the end of their terms of service, may receive educational awards to pay for further education or to pay off student loans. In order to further the goals of his national service initiative, the President has urged all Federal agencies to explore ways in which to incorporate national and community service into their Federal programs. To encourage the integration of national and community service with Federal programs, the National Service Corporation has earmarked up to $16.3 million that may be available specifically for the planning and operation of national and community service programs to be operated by Federal agencies or by other eligible entities (as defined in Section 1.4.1, ``Eligible Service Organizations,'' of this RFP) in partnership with Federal agencies. Federal agencies may also apply for educational awards for program participants. At the Department of Transportation (``DOT''), we intend to fully embrace this opportunity to use national and community service programs to further our transportation-related community, state, and national goals. It is our mission to provide future generations with a transportation system that is safer, more environmentally sound, and more efficient. The strategic goals that we have set to accomplish this mission go hand-in-hand with the goals of the National and Community Service Trust Act. At DOT, we are striving to: --Tie America together through an effective intermodal transportation system; --Promote safe and secure transportation; --Actively enhance our environment through wise transportation decisions; --Put people first in our transportation system by making it relevant and accessible to users. We believe that national and community service can contribute effectively to the achievement of all of these transportation-related goals. 1.2 Programs and Purpose Since DOT is new to the community service field, our intent is to tap the resources of existing community service organizations to implement our national and community service programs. The purpose of this RFP is to solicit proposals from eligible service organizations for transportation-related national and community service projects. Applicants may submit proposals involving activities within one or a combination of the five transportation-related programs that have been developed by DOT as being particularly suitable for national and community service projects: 1. Rehabilitation, Reclamation and Beautification of Transportation-Related Facilities; 2. ``Transit Ambassadors''--providing assistance to the elderly, disabled, and children in Head Start programs in using public transportation systems; 3. ``Operation Lifesaver''--making rail/highway crossings safer; 4. Hazardous Materials Transportation Emergency Preparedness Assistance; and 5. Youth Traffic Safety Education Programs. Each of these five programs are explained in more detail later in this RFP and are referred to throughout as the ``DOT Programs.'' DOT will evaluate all of the proposals that it receives based on the criteria and priorities set forth in Section 4 of this RFP, and will enter into formal agreements to establish partnerships with service organizations that submit the proposals that are selected. Initially, these projects will most likely be concentrated in geographic areas of the greatest need based on the criteria set forth in the regulations issued under the National and Community Service Trust Act (see ``Needs'' under Section 4.1, ``General Criteria'' in this RFP). However, DOT views these initial projects to be the beginning of a broader, more comprehensive program. DOT plans to fund the initial projects in these programs through two sources. First, DOT funds appropriated to DOT agencies will be available to partially finance projects in some of the five DOT Programs in fiscal year 1994. In addition, DOT may apply to the National Service Corporation for additional funding for operational costs and for educational awards (if requested) from the funds set aside by the National Service Corporation for Federal agency programs. (Since there is no guarantee that DOT will receive funding from the National Service Corporation, a proposal selected by DOT ultimately might not be fully funded or funded at all if DOT's request for funding from the National Service Corporation is not granted.) The service organizations sponsoring the project will have to provide matching funds for a portion of project costs. Any funds that DOT receives from the National Service Corporation will be from the $16.3 million that has been earmarked for Federal agencies. Therefore, the DOT Programs may provide service organizations with access to a source of funds for which they are otherwise not eligible. DOT will inform applicants prior to April 15, 1994, as to whether they have been selected to receive DOT funding and whether they will be included in DOT's application to the National Service Corporation. DOT anticipates that notification of National Service Corporation awards for Federal agency programs will occur in May or June of 1994. 1.3 General Program Requirements Any proposal submitted under this RFP must comply with the general requirements for service programs that are set forth in the National and Community Service Trust Act and related regulations. These requirements include: 1. Employing participants on a full-time basis (1700 hours for a period of not less than nine months and not more than a year); or on a part-time basis (900 hours for a period of not more than two years, or, if the individual is enrolled in an institution of higher education while performing all or part of the service, not more than three years). 2. Employing at least 20 full time equivalent participants unless an explanation is provided as to why a smaller number is appropriate. 3. Paying participants a living allowance of at least $7,440 for fiscal year 1994 (but not more than twice that amount). 4. Providing participants with health care benefits and, if necessary, child care benefits during the term of service. 5. Providing for participants to receive educational awards (either from the National Service Corporation or from some other source) in an amount of $4,725 for one full-time term of service or $2,360 for one part-time term of service, for up to two terms of service. (If educational awards will not be received by all participants, the program must ensure that the distribution of educational awards is performed in an equitable manner that treats equally all participants doing the same or essentially similar work. Distribution based solely on economic needs of participants is not encouraged.) 6. Not displacing other employees or positions, nor supplanting the hiring or promotion of employees. The written concurrence of any local labor organization representing employees engaged in the same or substantially similar work must be obtained. If a proposal is selected and funded, the service organization will be required to enter into a formal agreement to establish the partnership with DOT, which will set forth the specific terms and conditions of the partnership arrangement, including provisions for monitoring and evaluating the project. The selected service organization will also be required to enter into formal agreements with the participants in its project to spell out the terms and conditions of service. 1.4 Eligibility Requirements 1.4.1 Eligible Service Organizations Subdivisions of states, Indian Tribes, public or private nonprofit organizations (including labor organizations), institutions of higher education, or a consortia of entities that propose to administer or operate a national or community service program are eligible to submit proposals for the DOT Programs. 1.4.2 Eligible Participants Eligibility for individual participation in community and national service projects is limited to participants who: (1) are 17 years of age or older at the commencement of service, unless the individual is in a youth corps program, in which case the participant must be between the ages of 16 and 25; (2) either have received a high school diploma or its equivalent, including an alternative diploma or certificate for those individuals with mental and physical disabilities for whom such alternative diploma or certificate is appropriate, or agree to obtain a high school diploma or its equivalent. (However, if the program conducts an independent evaluation demonstrating that the potential participant is incapable of obtaining a high school diploma or its equivalent, this requirement may be waived); (3) have not dropped out of elementary or secondary school in order to enroll as a national service participant, unless the participant is enrolled in an institution of higher education on an ability to benefit basis and is considered eligible for funds under section 484 of the Higher Education Act of 1965; (4) are citizens or nationals of the United States; and (5) meet the task-related eligibility requirements established by the program. 2. Program Descriptions 2.1 Overview To implement its national and community service program, DOT has identified five specific national and community service programs that combine the goals and priorities of the National and Community Service Trust Act and the goals and priorities of DOT. Applicants may submit proposals falling within one or a combination of DOT Programs. The proposals should tailor the selected DOT Program(s) to the specific needs of the community to be served. The following is a description of the five DOT Programs: 2.2 Rehabilitation, Reclamation, and Beautification of Transportation- Related Facilities 2.2.1 Description of Program The DOT program for ``Rehabilitation, Reclamation and Beautification of Transportation-Related Facilities'' has been developed to implement the provisions of section 106(d) of the Act, which establishes an urban youth corps in DOT, and authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to enter into formal agreements to form partnerships with qualified urban youth corps. The Secretary may make grants of DOT funds to States (and through States to local governments) for the purpose of supporting qualified urban youth corps projects. In addition, proposals for qualified urban youth corps projects to be conducted by eligible service organizations (as defined in Section 1.4.1 of this RFP) may be included in DOT's application for funding from the National Service Corporation. These include projects that the Secretary is authorized to carry out under other authority of law involving public works resources or facilities. Section 106(d) is based on the finding of Congress that public works and transportation resources are in need of labor intensive rehabilitation, reclamation, and beautification work that has been neglected in the past and cannot be adequately carried out by Federal, State, and local government at existing personnel levels. Rehabilitation, reclamation, and beautification of public roads and public works facilities through the efforts of young people in the United States participating in urban youth corps can benefit these youths and their communities. An urban youth corps project that would qualify under this DOT Program is one that is established by an eligible service organization (as defined under Section 1.4.1 of this RFP) and that: a. Is capable of offering meaningful, full-time, productive work for individuals between the ages of 16 and 25, inclusive, in an urban public works or transportation setting; b. Gives participants a mix of work experience, basic and life skills, education, training, and support services; and c. Provides participants with the opportunity to develop citizenship values and skills through service to their communities and the United States. Although any project proposed under this Program should involve an urban youth corps in a significant portion of the work, the proposal may also include other eligible groups of community service participants that will work along with the urban youth corps. Potential projects include organizing and managing community beautification projects to plant trees and flowers adjacent to highways and transportation terminals and corridors; coordinating with railroad companies to organize clean up campaigns and work days along railroad tracks and rights of way; working with local artists to beautify terminals and facilities with art work; and clean up and beautification of roadsides, transportation corridors, and access to transportation facilities. Community service projects will be associated with at least one mode of transportation, i.e., rail, transit, or highway. All projects will need to be coordinated with the organizations having authority over the relevant transportation facilities (such as State Departments of Transportation, local Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), or transit authorities). As part of its proposal under this DOT Program, an applicant will need to show that the project is acceptable to the relevant transportation organizations. 2.2.2 Goals and Priorities This program addresses the following national priorities established by the National Service Corporation: a. Education--Urban youth corps projects will include specific project-related and general job skills training that will prepare participants for future employment opportunities. Training will also include specific skills related to the project being undertaken, such as carpentry, landscaping, and environmental planning. b. Public Safety--Recruiting at-risk youths in urban settings for participation in youth corps activities will provide opportunities for youths to be productively involved in community activities, reducing the inclination to turn to activities such as drug dealing or other crimes. In addition, cleaner transportation facilities will make the facilities more attractive, drawing more users, and in turn, making them safer for use by all. c. Human Needs--Urban youth corps projects will provide job skills training that will help individuals become self-sufficient. Job skills will include basics such as taking responsibility for attendance, being accountable for work products, and dealing with supervisors. In addition, these projects will be targeted at improving communities and neighborhoods. d. Environment--Rehabilitation, reclamation and beautification of transportation facilities will enhance neighborhoods as well as assist in conserving and restoring the environment. 2.2.3 Anticipated Outcomes and Results Urban youth corps projects will result in benefits to communities, neighborhoods, and transportation facilities in the form of renovated, restored, and cleaner facilities and areas. Participants will not only have the opportunity to perform community service but will learn job skills that will prepare them for future employment opportunities. 2.2.4 Funding The Federal share of funding for urban youth corps projects may be provided from existing DOT program funds and state Federal-aid funds. DOT intends to apply for any additional funds needed for program costs, including living allowances, educational awards, health insurance, and child care costs, from the National Service Corporation. It is anticipated that direct funding for the Rehabilitation, Reclamation, and Beautification of Transportation-Related Facilities Program may be available from DOT in future years. 2.2.5 DOT Agency Involvement and Expertise Available DOT agencies involved in this Program include the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, and the Federal Railroad Administration. For the selected proposals, DOT representatives will work with sponsoring organizations to contact State DOTs, MPOs, transit authorities, etc., with authority over the relevant transportation facilities to assist with project arrangements and agreements. 2.2.6 DOT Contacts Karen Kabel, Federal Highway Administration (HMS-31) (202) 366-9074, FAX (202) 366-3235 Gordon Smith, Federal Railroad Administration (RAD-10.1) (202) 366- 0589, FAX (202) 366-7439 Roger Tate, Federal Transit Administration (TTS-31) (202) 366-0235, FAX (202) 366-3765 Address: 400 7th St., SW., Washington, DC 20950. 2.3 Transit Ambassadors 2.3.1 Description of Program The DOT Federal Transit Administration's program for ``Transit Ambassadors'' proposes to use participants in community service programs to help elderly and disabled persons learn to use public transportation systems in their communities. Program participants, called ``transit ambassadors'', would assist these targeted individuals in locating bus stops, understanding how the fare system works, and identifying potential destinations, such as grocery stores, medical facilities, etc. Transit ambassadors would teach individuals how to use public transportation, and how to read maps and time schedules. In addition, transit ambassadors will accompany persons who need such assistance to navigate their way on conventional, fixed route public transportation service. Assistance may be of a one-time nature to acquaint an individual with public transportation routes and services. Transit Ambassadors may also provide regular or scheduled guide services. The most minimal sort of service the transit ambassador could provide would simply be visiting an individual and providing schedule and fare information, and answering questions about a pending trip or series of trips. The service would include training individuals about their neighborhood and the shops within it, increasing the confidence level for those who then could move around independently and provide overall better security in the affected neighborhoods. As part of this program, transit ambassadors will assess the local transportation facilities to identify obstacles that prevent disabled and elderly persons from safely and easily traveling on public transportation, and will work with local transportation authorities to remove these obstacles. The transit ambassadors will also work with the local transit authorities to develop and distribute information that will facilitate and encourage the use of public transportation by the elderly and disabled (such as more easily readable bus schedules, community maps showing routes to locations of particular interest, or information on special fares or rates available for the elderly or disabled). This program also has the potential for developing partnerships with other Federal agencies (such as the Department of Health and Human Services or the Department of Education) to accompany youths to and from Head Start Programs and, in addition, provide assistance to Head Start teachers during class. In such a partnership, transit ambassadors could also be trained as aides on transportation vehicles to and from Head Start facilities/programs. Transit ambassadors could instruct Head Start children and their parents on the routes to bus stops, and teach the children about proper behavior and safety procedures while riding on a bus. Transit ambassadors could also act as aides to Head Start teachers during the remainder of the day. 2.3.2 Goals and Priorities Transit Ambassadors will address the following national priorities: a. Public Safety. By providing escorts and training for elderly and disabled persons, this program will help decrease potential violence to elderly and disabled citizens; transportation assistance for the Head Start program will also increase safety to and from bus stops and on those buses. b. Health and Human Needs. Transportation assistance for elderly and disabled persons will enable them to get to medical and other facilities more readily and more independently. c. Mitigate the impact of unfunded mandates. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires all public transit systems to provide supplementary door-to-door paratransit service for those individuals who are unable to use even fully accessible public transit. The Transit Ambassador Program will help instill confidence in elderly and disabled persons in the use of conventional public transportation and limit the call for more expensive door-to-door paratransit to individuals with mobility difficulties. d. Education. Transit ambassador participating in programs with the elderly and disabled will learn about the needs of those populations and will help to integrate them into mainstream society. In addition, if cooperative partnerships are formed with other Federal agencies such as the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Education, the Transit Ambassadors Program will provide aides for Head Start programs and help make children more ``school ready.'' In such a partnership, transit ambassadors will be able to work with children on the bus and in class, and provide information to them and their parents. 2.3.3 Anticipated Outcomes and Results a. The program will benefit the local community and transit operators. Elderly and disabled citizens will be able to participate in the community. Transit Ambassadors will develop knowledge of needs of the populations served and increase skills for dealing with these populations. b. Disciplines learned in this program can be carried over into careers in the medical field, social services, transportation and education. 2.3.4 Funding Funding for this proposal will be available from the Federal Transit Administration at an anticipated level of up to $235,000 for program costs. DOT intends to apply for any additional funds needed for program costs, including living allowances, educational awards, health insurance, and child care costs, from the National Service Corporation. It is anticipated that direct funding for the Transit Ambassadors Program may be available from DOT in future years. 2.3.5 DOT Agency Involvement and Expertise Available The Federal Transit Administration will be the agency within DOT that will implement the Transit Ambassador Program. 2.3.6 DOT Contact Roger Tate, Federal Transit Administration, Room 6100 A, 400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: (202) 366-0235. 2.4 Operation Lifesaver 2.4.1 Description of Program ``Operation Lifesaver'' is an active, continuous national public information and education program that works in conjunction with the DOT Federal Railroad Administration. This program provides help in preventing and reducing crashes, injuries and fatalities and in improving driver performance at the nation's 300,000 public and private rail/highway grade crossings. Operation Lifesaver originated in Idaho in 1972 after Union Pacific Railroad and community leaders in the state decided to band together and fight the growing number of rail/highway grade crossing crashes, injuries and fatalities with a public education program. At the end of the first year the rail/highway grade crossing fatality rate dropped a resounding 39 percent. The program is now national in scope as all states have their own Operation Lifesaver programs. It is at the grassroots level--in the cities, in rural communities, and in the schools--where Operation Lifesaver has been most effective. States have reported fatality reductions at rail/highway grade crossings ranging from 28 percent to 100 percent one year after establishing the program. There are two concepts through which Operation Lifesaver may be incorporated within the umbrella of the DOT National Service program: a. The first would use a community service organization to assess the number and location of railroad/street, road, and highway intersections within the defined geographic area. Based upon the data developed, the community service organization would be responsible for developing and presenting an educational program suitable for elementary schools, secondary schools, colleges, civic organizations, service organizations and fraternal groups. b. The second would address the provision of organizational and administrative assistance to the various state Operation Lifesaver offices through the recruitment and placement of assistant program coordinators. These individuals would enhance the ability of the State office to acquire information and establish geographic databases; organize and plan educational programs and campaigns; coordinate media initiatives and relationships; and systematize internal procedures and processes. This concept involves placement of individuals in single positions in a number of different states, and would be part of a multi-state program that would fall under the national service provisions of the Act. This portion of the program would be implemented incrementally based upon fiscal considerations. Organizations that could participate in the first concept include community service organizations eligible to participate under the National and Community Service Trust Act (see Section 1.4.1 of the RFP). Implementation of the second concept would be coordinated through the national Operation Lifesaver headquarters office located in Alexandria, Virginia. This second concept would facilitate individual recruitment of National Service volunteers at the local level and would provide participants with opportunities to provide service to their local communities and states and to participate in the development of viable transportation safety programs. 2.4.2 Goals and Priorities This program addresses the following national priorities: a. Education--Participants will be exposed to a variety of project specific tasks and general job skills that could prepare participants for future employment opportunities. b. Public Safety--Operation Lifesaver assists in promoting public awareness of the dangers associated with rail crossings, trespassing on railroad properties, and improper use of motor vehicles around rail facilities. Further, it will bring the audiences into contact with local police and other law enforcement agencies, which will open the lines of communication and create opportunities for cooperation. c. Human Needs--This Program will stimulate awareness of rail and highway safety-related problems within local and State communities and bring people together to address them. The programs will also provide safety training to a wide audience, ranging in age from pre-schoolers to senior citizens. d. Environment--Operation Lifesaver has been successful in reducing community environmental hazards associated with rail crossings. 2.4.3 Anticipated Outcomes and Results a. The utilization of a community service organization would result in benefits to the local communities and provide needed public education in the area of rail safety to the specifically targeted audiences and the general public. As past records have shown, there should be a downward trend in accidents, injuries, and trespasser violations in conjunction with the Operation Lifesaver Program. The statistics developed would be readily available for program evaluation, cost analysis, and community acceptance and adoption. b. The hiring and placement of assistant administrative coordinators throughout the Operation Lifesaver system would result in better coordination of the program with railroad companies, law enforcement agencies, local and state governments, the various informational media and the general population. The opportunity to function within an established program would enhance the job skills and personal marketability for the participants for future endeavors. Both concepts will expose the participants to the opportunity to perform community service, and enhance the development of personal qualities, educational values and positive work ethics. 2.4.4 Funding DOT intends to apply for funding for program costs, including living allowances, educational awards, health insurance, and child care costs, from the National Service Corporation. A budgetary review is ongoing at this time to seek other sources of funding within DOT. The National and Community Service Act will be an item in the Fiscal Year 1996 budget submission of the Federal Railroad Administration, and it is anticipated that direct funding for national service involvement in the Operation Lifesaver program may be available from DOT in future years. 2.4.5 DOT Agency Involvement and Expertise Available The Operation Lifesaver and adjunct trespasser programs are addressed by several of the DOT modal administrations, specifically the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2.4.6 DOT Contacts Gordon J. Smith, Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Administration, (202) 366-0589, FAX (202) 366-7439 Bruce George, Highway Rail Crossing and Trespasser Division, Federal Railroad Administration, (202) 366-0533 Mailing Address: Room 8232, 400 7th St. SW., Washington DC 20590 2.5 Hazardous Materials Transportation Emergency Preparedness Assistance 2.5.1 Description of Program a. Background. The DOT Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety (OHMS), currently carries out a national safety program to protect against the risks to life, health, property, and the environment inherent in the transportation of hazardous materials by water, air, highway and railroad. OHMS plans, implements, and manages hazardous materials regulatory, enforcement, and outreach programs, and administers a user fee funded grant program to States and Indian tribes for planning and training for hazardous materials emergencies. The number and type of entities regulated by OHMS have increased dramatically since 1990, when the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA) was amended. Prior to 1990, the office had jurisdiction over approximately 40,000 hazardous materials shippers and carriers. In the future, the inclusion of intrastate shippers and carriers will bring an additional 110,000 newly regulated shippers and carriers mandated by the HMTA amendment under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR). Certain shippers and carriers are required to register with the Department and pay an annual fee. The Hazardous Materials Registration Program, which began in September 1992, funds emergency preparedness grants to States and Indian tribes for training and preparing to respond to hazardous materials emergencies. The HMTA Grant Program was presented to Congress in 1990 during the legislative process reauthorizing the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act of 1974. Grant funds were first distributed in Fiscal Year 1993. The HMTA grant program is carefully crafted to build upon existing programs and relationships. It has increased the emphasis on improving the capability of communities to plan for the full range of transportation related hazardous materials risks they face. Forty-seven States are participating in the HMTA grant program--an overwhelming first year response. Fifty-eight grants, totaling approximately $8.4 million, were given to States, Tribes, and Territories in the first grant budget period. 180,000 emergency responders will be trained with HMTA grant funds in the first year of the program; 81% of these responders are either paid or volunteer firefighters. The existing grant process begins with each participating State's Governor determining which agency within the State receives the HMTA grant. The selected agency distributes funds in accordance with HMTA grant rules and required certifications, ensuring the assistance is provided to intended recipients. The grant distribution system allows each State's Governor to make decisions on funding based on local factors, and allows DOT to leverage resources, thereby operating the HMTA grant program efficiently. The HMTA grant distribution system is lean, and gives exceptionally responsive service to State grantees. b. National Service Corps. Under the OHMS's ``Hazardous Materials Transportation Emergency Preparedness Assistance'' Program, national service funding will be used to employ national service participants as assistants to the State Emergency Response Commission (SERC), Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC), and State Emergency Management Agency levels. This Program will reinforce the Nation's Hazardous Materials Transportation Emergency Response/State Emergency Response structure, one of the objectives of the existing HMTA grant program. Local SERC/LEPC/emergency management national service participants may serve as assistants to prepare local emergency plans, perform hazardous materials commodity flow studies, and coordinate exercise of plans. These jobs, requiring little previous experience, could be learned mainly through on-the-job training. Use of national service funds to increase the effectiveness of the nationally recognized HMTA grant program would not only help the nation and localities, but also give national service participants experience in, and access to, an industry which is experiencing growth. The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, a reaction in part to the Bhopal, India tragedy, created SERCs and LEPCs to plan for emergency response, including feedback and coordination from broadly based local groups; many responsibilities were levied on states and localities with little funding. This program can provide assistance not previously available. Similarly, state emergency management agencies need assistance with hazardous materials planning and training grants. It is proposed that national service participants be involved as follows: 1. A day in the life of a national service participant might include assignment to an LEPC. For this participant the day might include working under the LEPC chairperson's supervision to gather data at the state police inspection point for a commodity flow study. The participant might use the data while interacting with LEPC members at an evening meeting. As a result of the meeting the LEPC might modify their emergency plan. 2. At other times the participant might distribute material safety data sheets to the public, conduct community outreach meetings, or receive notification of a hazardous materials release and provide support for the SERC/LEPC or the community. At a state emergency information center, the participant might assist the watch officer in preparing and distributing the daily situation report. 3. Daily activities provide on-the-job training. For example, data may have indicated heavy transport of gasoline indicating the need for training in response to tanker incidents. The participant learns from experience the interaction between data, planning, and training. The participant might also be mentored by the members of the LEPC, the response community, or the trucking industry. In this way, the public good is served and the participant receives valuable training. 2.5.2 Goals and Priorities The proposed program meets all criteria for funding under the President's National Service program; it improves public safety and health, guards the environment, and educates program participants. The program addresses national service priorities while at the same time provides an opportunity for public service and giving participants training that may enable them to gain employment later. It specifically addresses the following national priorities: a. Environment. The program will help eliminate environmental risks through education of communities and through risk preparation/ prevention. Development of currently unavailable databases could provide the information especially helpful in accident avoidance and response. Hazardous materials planning and training assistant positions at SERC/LEPCs and HMTA State grantee offices are currently going unfilled. b. Education. If students are selected for these positions, this program will meet the ``Education'' national priority. On-the-job training will provide unparalleled opportunities for individuals to learn skills leading to diplomas or equivalent recognition of accomplishment. In addition, this program addresses two Department of Transportation Strategic Goals: (1) Promoting safe and secure transportation, and (2) enhancing the environment through wise transportation decisions. 2.5.3 Anticipated Outcomes and Results Communities and individuals will benefit from national service participation. Participants can contribute to an increased awareness of environmental protection and emergency response. Community outreach, a possible activity for participants, can help involve residents in discussion of issues and formulation of policy that can directly benefit the community. An ultimate goal of individual programs would be improved emergency response. Schools and community groups can be targets for educational programs, thereby increasing the knowledge level in the community. 2.5.4 Funding Up to $60,000 of the Federal share of living allowances for participants may be provided by the Research and Special Programs Administration in DOT. DOT intends to apply for any additional funds needed for program costs, including living allowances, educational awards, health insurance, and child care costs, from the National Service Corporation. 2.5.5 DOT Agencies Involved and Expertise Available The Office of Hazardous Materials Safety within the Research and Special Programs Administration will be the office in DOT that will implement this Program. 2.5.6 DOT Contact The primary contact for DOT for the Hazardous Materials Transportation Emergency Preparedness Assistance Program will be: Charles Rogoff, HMTA Grants Manager, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, the Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA). (202) 366-0001, The National Service Program contact is: Jim Kabel, Office of Policy and Program Support, RSPA (202) 366-6714. 2.6 Youth Traffic Safety Education Programs 2.6.1 Description of Program a. Background and purpose. The DOT National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's program for Youth Traffic Safety Education offers the opportunity to train young volunteers aged 16 to 25 to be proficient in traffic safety and then become positive role models for traffic safety behaviors for both younger children and their young adult peers. The children, youth, and young adult populations are over-represented in fatal motor vehicle crashes and are therefore at very high risk of being involved in potentially life-threatening or debilitating motor vehicle incidents. In the U.S., injury is the leading cause of death for people ages 1 to 44. Traffic crashes alone are consistently the leading cause of death for persons between the ages of 5 and 34. Many of the deaths and injuries that occur on our roads are not the result of unavoidable incidents. By and large, these consequences are the result of failure to take proper precautions such as wearing safety belts and bicycle helmets as well as unsafe behaviors such as speeding and impaired driving. These losses strike particularly hard on young families and young children. Attempts to improve chances of survival focusing on injury prevention call for traffic safety programs to increase safe behaviors. Increasing safe behaviors depends largely on educating individuals about precautionary measures and rules of the road such as using child safety seats to transport young children, buckling up all motor vehicle passengers, practicing safe bicycle and pedestrian behaviors, not speeding, and never driving impaired or riding with an impaired driver. b. Scope of work. This project calls for a two-phase activity for the grantee to train young adult volunteer participants on critical traffic safety issues and to conduct educational activities using trained volunteers to promote highway safety for children and youth from prekindergarten through eighth grade. The educational activities use peer and cross-age mentoring as a teaching technique that has been found quite effective with this age group. Phase one is the development and conduct of training. Phase two is the program implementation. Prior to applying, the potential applicant shall conduct a preliminary assessment and problem identification, to the extent possible, of the current status of community traffic fatalities and injuries as well as safety activities and resources, consulting sources such as the state office of highway safety, law enforcement agencies, hospitals, health clinics, and local chapters of other organizations involved with traffic safety efforts such as SAFE KIDS Coalition, Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), and Students Against Driving Drunk (SADD). The state office of highway safety may be able to provide a general outline of the problem and many of the activities underway within a designated area. The applicant shall use the preliminary assessment to help design a complementary plan of educational activities, providing both the preliminary community assessment and the educational activity plan as part of the application. i. Program Phase One. Phase one will entail completing the preliminary community assessment, finalizing the educational program plan, and developing and implementing the training component. In preparation for dealing with the complex and technical highway safety issues, a training program for community service volunteers including specialized training and experiential learning will be the integral part of the preparation for conducting educational safety activities. The training program will be developed and implemented with the consultation and coordination of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (``NHTSA'') and community experts corresponding with the educational activity plan. The training program must also be coordinated with and approved by the traffic unit of the local law enforcement department. Ideally, local law enforcement will be represented in training sessions to the extent possible. All participating program volunteers will complete initial training demonstrating a minimum level of knowledge and skills before beginning traffic safety education activities. The training program may extend into the program implementation phase as appropriate for continued instruction and consultation with experts. ii. Program Phase Two. The grantee will then utilize trained volunteers to implement key traffic safety programs to meet local needs using available resources. Programs should incorporate one or more of the following traffic safety areas: child passenger safety, pedestrian safety, bicycle safety, safety belt use, and alcohol impairment. Several activities may be done concurrently or consecutively for added impact in a given traffic safety area or increased exposure to distinct traffic safety issues. Subjects may also be combined for a more comprehensive traffic-safety message. Suggested activities in the corresponding traffic safety areas include but are not limited to the following: Child Passenger SafetyBounty Program A Bounty Program utilizes volunteers to work with merchants and others to remove no-longer-safe child safety seats from the reuse and resale markets. No-longer-safe car seats include those manufactured before current standards; no longer containing labeling identifying model and manufacturer; missing parts; containing broken, cracked, frayed, or rusted parts; under recall; or previously involved in a motor vehicle crash. Volunteers could work with local newspapers to publish public service announcements in the classified sections alerting the garage sale market about the program. Safe child car seats are available at low cost in many areas through discount stores, car seat loaner programs, insurance companies, and other sources. Additional child passenger safety activities could include working with local distributors to develop a local shopping guide specifying sites with child safety seat model availability and price lists. A ``how to'' manual is available from NHTSA to help establish a bounty program. (Can be conducted in conjunction with hospitals, police departments, fire departments, and day care centers.) Pedestrian Safety Pedestrian Safety Elementary Education Program Two programs are available to reach young children with safe pedestrian information. The ``Willy Whistle'' program can be conducted in one or two pedestrian safety lessons. Resources include an age appropriate video for children from kindergarten through third grade or fourth through seventh grade and teaching guides with discussion questions, activity ideas, and a parent letter. Both videos teach critical behaviors needed by young pedestrians to avoid dangerous situations. ``Wary Walker'' is a pedestrian safety school-based curriculum consisting of five classroom lessons, an outdoor field day, and a two-part parent/child activity workbook to be completed at home by the family. The focus is on teaching elementary school children basic pedestrian skills emphasizing street crossing while encouraging independent thinking, making safe choices, and evaluating themselves and others as pedestrians using a variety of props including instructional videos, worksheets, cartoon characters, a pedestrian safety rap song, and a Map to Safety. (Can be conducted in conjunction with schools.) School Crossing Guard Program Adult school crossing guard programs have been developed to help safely expedite the movement of children to and from school by creating gaps in traffic. Crossing guards act in identified high risk intersections separately from school student safety patrols who assist students on school property. The crossing guard program is used in cities of all sizes and has become an integral part of school crossing protection programs across the country. Most crossing guard programs are organized and administered by local law enforcement units in cooperation and coordination with school authorities and require strict reliability of participants. State or local legislation may establish procedures and guidelines pertaining to school crossing guards which could include minimum age, education requirements, and uniform attire for guards. Training materials available through the American Automobile Association (AAA) and other sources may be used if standard training materials are not already established in a particular locality. (Can be conducted in conjunction with law enforcement and schools. Note that this project can only be implemented if it will not displace other employees.) Bicycle Safety Bicycle Helmet Program Despite the effectiveness of wearing helmets in preventing death and serious head injury, only a very small percentage of cyclists wear them for many reasons including misperceptions of helmets being uncool, ugly, too hot, and too heavy. Purchasing bicycle helmets may also be cost prohibitive to consumers not fully aware of their potential life- saving benefits. Bicycle videos promoting safe cycling through increased use of helmets and videos demonstrating the proper fit of helmets are available through the American Academy of Pediatrics and other organizations. Potential program activities could include bicycle helmet demonstrations allowing first-hand helmet use, the distribution of bicycle helmet discount coupons obtained with the cooperation of local merchants or manufacturers, and the development and distribution of local shopping guides specifying area stores with model availability, sizes, and price lists. (Can be conducted in conjunction with parent and teacher organizations, civic groups, and schools.) Bicycle Rodeo Bicycle rodeos are half or full-day events requiring fairly extensive planning and design which teach children of all ages how to ride their bikes safely and correctly. The rodeo allows participants to ride their bicycles while they practice and improve bicycle safety skills and learn about traffic situations while rotating through several activity stations. Some of the skills are also transferable to situations in which children are pedestrians. Complete guides for conducting rodeos are available for assistance. (Can be conducted in conjunction with law enforcement, schools, and youth centers.) Safety Belts School Safety Belt Use Program Young drivers and passengers have the lowest safety belt use rates of any age group. Their reasons often include not wanting to wrinkle their clothes, not wanting to appear uncool or wimpy in front of friends, and include myths such as ``I could never be involved in a crash,'' ``I'd rather be thrown clear from the car in a crash,'' and ``I don't want to be trapped if the car catches on fire.'' Safety belt use programs can be designed to correct the misperceptions with facts and include activities that will raise awareness about the importance of wearing a safety belt properly every time a person rides in a motor vehicle. Activities can include taking children out to a car to instruct them how to properly buckle up in both the front and back seats and allowing them to practice, conducting a safety belt speed challenge to show that buckling up only takes a couple of seconds that could save a life, demonstrating the effectiveness of safety belts through a carefully designed egg experiment, taking an observational safety belt use survey of people arriving and departing school property, and having students sign pledge cards to wear safety belts and encourage others to do the same. (Can be conducted in conjunction with schools and student clubs.) Alcohol Teen Courts Teen courts represent an intervention approach that employs the dramatic role of peer influence responding to youth problem behaviors often prompted by peer pressure, such as underage drinking, impaired driving, and other antisocial behaviors. Teen courts could supplement the traditional juvenile justice system in which volunteers (teens or young adults) could work with the local justice system to implement and administer a teen court system, serving as bailiffs, clerks, prosecuting and defense attorneys, and, in some cases, judges. Volunteers would also coordinate recruiting youth jurors from the community to sit on juries for individual cases. Information on how to set up a teen court is available from NHTSA. On the whole, teen courts help provide a diversion from the juvenile justice system, appear to reduce recidivism, and capitalize on peer influence to alleviate illegal behaviors. Additional alcohol-awareness activism for volunteers could include efforts to utilize youth as court room monitors to collect data and make recommendations to solve problems, conduct intergenerational issue presentations, and use impaired driving victim impact panels in presentations. (Can be conducted in conjunction with juvenile justice system, schools, law enforcement, and Mothers Against Drunk Driving.) c. Volunteer Participant and Program Requirements. Due to the highly technical nature of the program and the limitation of available funds, this project is designed as a pilot program to train the equivalent of 10 full-time youth or young adult volunteers. Volunteers should be between the ages of 16 and 25, with a high school diploma or its equivalent, working in a single city or community. The volunteers should be proficient speaking the dominant language or languages of the area. Volunteers should be divided into two teams of five with two volunteers designated as team leaders. Team leaders should be full-time volunteers with a college diploma or some college experience. Preference will be given to volunteers, especially team leaders, with experience or interest in education, public safety, public health, recreation, physical education, marketing, public relations, journalism, or media relations. Eligible applicants will be required to demonstrate, through a letter of cooperation, the support of the traffic division of the local law enforcement agency for the implementation of the planned program. Additional support organizations might include: Highway safety agencies, emergency medical services units, motor vehicle administration, educational institutions, public health officials, and private industry representatives. The applicant shall also provide both the preliminary community assessment and the educational activity plan as part of the application. The program shall incorporate evaluation measurements to determine the level of success of the program activities. 2.6.2 Goals and Priorities This program addresses the following national service priorities: a. Human Needs.--Motor vehicle crashes cost the nation nearly $14 billion in health care expenditures each year. With each serious injury prevented saving approximately $35,000 in health care costs, as much as $1 billion could be saved nationally through the prevention of traffic deaths and injuries. U.S. Transportation Secretary Federico Pena has called for stepped-up national efforts to reduce the proportion of alcohol involved traffic crashes to 43 percent and increase safety belt use to 75 percent by 1997 as part of President Clinton's health care initiative and year 2000 objectives. b. Education.--Traffic safety education for children and youth ages 3 through 13 (prekindergarten through grade 8) aims to increase school readiness and further early childhood development. Before children are able to learn in school, they must be able to arrive at school safely each day. With traffic incidents as the leading cause of death and disability for school age children, they face a risk every day in their transport to and from school and other activities. c. Public Safety.--Through better education and peer mentoring, traffic-related crimes can be reduced. 2.6.3 Anticipated Outcomes and Results Young adult volunteers as mentors can make a constructive contribution to a national and community traffic safety problem while gaining practical learning experiences. The objective of these efforts is to improve the quality of life for young citizens by raising public awareness, reducing the severity and frequency of traffic safety problems, and providing highway safety experiences which could lead to related future career field choices. This program will allow volunteers to work cooperatively with law enforcement and other organizations within a designated community developing a positive, visible, outcome- oriented relationship to decrease death and injury due to motor vehicle crashes. The educational program will expose young children to appropriate behaviors which can become habits they will model to others and will practice to help keep themselves and others safe now and in the future. If the program proves beneficial to the community and agency, future expansion of a refined program with an increased number of participants may be explored. 2.6.4 Funding Funding available from DOT for program development, implementation, and administration is $50,000. Application will be made to the National Service Corporation for any additional program costs, living allowance, education awards, health insurance, and child care costs as appropriate for participating volunteers. It is anticipated that direct funding of the Youth Traffic Safety Education Programs may be available from DOT in future years. 2.2.5 DOT Agency Involvement and Expertise Available NHTSA will act as the project monitor working directly with the grantee to develop and implement a traffic safety training program through the local law enforcement department and facilitate additional state and community contacts with other organizations interested in and working on similar efforts. NHTSA may also provide access to additional materials, training, technical assistance, and data as appropriate. In addition to its headquarters staff, NHTSA has ten regional offices that work directly with the states to implement highway safety programs to reduce motor vehicle crashes including related fatalities, injuries, and economic loss. 2.2.6 DOT Contact Ms. Susan Gorcowski, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Occupant Protection, 400 7th Street, SW., NTS-11, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2712/FAX (202) 366-2766. 3. Submission of Proposals 3.1 Content and Format for Proposals Each proposal submitted to DOT must be in the format and must contain the information set forth in the application form attached as Appendix A to this RFP. DOT may need to seek additional information from applicants as a result of changes in the proposed regulations issued by the National Service Corporation or to more fully clarify and define specific proposals. 3.2 Address; Number of Copies; Deadline for Submission Any eligible organization (as defined in Section 1.4.1 of this RFP) may submit one or more proposals for consideration by DOT. Each proposal may involve activities under a single DOT Program or may combine related activities under more that one of the DOT Programs set forth in Section 2 of this RFP. Applications should be double sided, double spaced, and printed in a font size not smaller than 12 points. One unbound copy of the proposal with original signatures suitable for reproduction, plus two bound copies, should be submitted. All pages should be numbered and the specific DOT Program or Programs to be addressed should be identified at the top of each page. All documentation, attachments, or other information pertinent to the application must be included in a single submission. Proposals should be submitted to: Brenda L. Harris, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, Department of Transportation, 400 7th Street S.W., Room 9414, Washington, D.C. 20590. Proposals must be received at DOT no later than March 23, 1994, 4 p.m. EST. 3.3 Coordination With State Community Service Plan The proposed regulations issued under the National and Community Service Trust Act require that all community service projects be coordinated with their state community service plan in order to assure that the projects build on existing programs and that they are not duplicative. Any service organization submitting a proposal for a DOT program must show evidence that the proposal has been reviewed and approved by the community service commission for the state(s) in which the project will be performed. In addition, DOT requests that each proposal include a preliminary evaluation by the state on national and community service for the state in which the project is to be performed (the ``state commission''). An evaluation form to be completed by the state commission is included as ``Attachment 6'' to the attached application form. The evaluation by the state commissions are not mandatory and are not binding on DOT. However, DOT believes that any information from the state commissions would be extremely helpful in our review and, therefore, we strongly encourage all applicants to obtain an evaluation from the state commission. 4. Selection Criteria 4.1 General Criteria The following criteria and weights will be used by DOT to select national and community service proposals: 1. Need (10%). DOT will take into consideration the extent to which both the overall program and its particular projects will address needs important to the community and be conducted in areas of need as defined in the National and Community Service Trust Act. These areas of need are: a. Communities designated by the Federal government or states as empowerment zones or redevelopment areas, targeted for special economic incentives, or otherwise identifiable as having high concentrations of low-income people. b. Areas that are environmentally distressed. c. Areas adversely affected by Federal actions related to the management of Federal lands that result in significant regional job losses and economic dislocation. d. Areas adversely affected by reduction in Defense spending or the closure or realignment of military installations. e. Areas that have unemployment rates greater than the national average unemployment for the most recent 12 months for which satisfactory data are available. 2. Program Design (40%). DOT will consider the quality of the program based on: the potential impact of using proposed national service participants to meet the community needs being addressed; inclusion of a clear and compelling mission statement; identification of specific objectives and indicators of success; development of an effective recruitment, selection, and training plan for staff and participants, including recruitment of participants and staff from the community to be served; ability to provide appropriate supervision, counseling, service- learning and other education opportunities, and outplacement to participants; the involvement of participants and community residents in the design, operation, and leadership of the program; development of a sound plan for continually improving the program based on self- assessment and monitoring of community and participant satisfaction with work performed; inclusion of an appropriate organization and staffing plan; and the program's cost-effectiveness in achieving identified outcomes, including per participant cost. 3. Organizational Capacity (30%). DOT will consider organizational capacity based on: the quality of the leadership of the national service program; the past performance of the organization or program; the organization's connection to the community; the extent to which the program builds on existing programs; evidence of strong and broad-based community support for the program; and availability of additional funding sources for the program. An application proposing the replication of an existing program will also be evaluated based on the success of the program in its original site, including the results of any evaluation undertaken; the program's analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the original program; reasons for selecting the replication site and discussion of adjustments needed for adaptation to a new site; and the qualification of the leaders of the program at the new site. 4. Sustainability (10%). DOT will consider the ability of the program to sustain itself beyond the period of support from DOT or from the National Service Corporation as evidenced by strong and broad-based community support; presence of multiple or private funding sources; and cost- effectiveness. Additional consideration will be given to programs that significantly exceed the regional match with non-Federal funds. 5. Innovation and Replication (10%). DOT will consider the degree to which needs coincide to program design, the innovative aspects of the program, and the appropriateness of replicating the program in the future. 4.2 Priority Consideration In addition to the criteria on which individual applications will be rated, DOT may give priority consideration to all or some of the following issues: 1. Early Start Date. DOT is interested in programs that will be able to start up quickly after completing an appropriate planning phase (ideally by September of 1994). 2. Participant Diversity. DOT seeks a broadly diverse participant pool that includes a large representation of young adults; a mixture of individuals who have not attended college and those with college-education experience; approximately equal numbers of men and women; individuals of all races and ethnicities; and individuals with physical and cognitive disabilities. 3. Location. While DOT will attempt to assure that programs funded are geographically diverse, at the same time, for the first year of funding, DOT may give priority consideration to fund programs in any or all of the areas of greatest need as determined by criteria set forth in the regulations issued under the National and Community Service Trust Act (see ``Need'' in Section 4.1. ``General Criteria,'' of this RFP). 4. Matching Funds in Excess of Requirements. Priority consideration will be given to any proposals that provide funding from other sources in excess of the required match amounts (see Section 5.3, ``Matching Funds,'' in this RFP). 5. Overall Compliance and Consistency with the National and Community Service Trust Act and related regulations and all other applicable laws and regulations. 6. Ability to Achieve Transportation-Related Goals. DOT is particularly interested in programs that will address one or more of the following transportation-related goals: a. Tying America together through an effective intermodal transportation system; b. Promoting safe and secure transportation; c. Actively enhancing our environment through wise transportation decisions; d. Putting people first in our transportation system by making it relevant and accessible to users. 4.3 Priorities for Specific DOT Programs For each specific DOT Program, priority consideration will be given for proposals with the following characteristics: a. Priorities for Rehabilitation, Reclamation, and Beautification of Transportation-Related Facilities Program: 1. Proposal's balance between work experience, basic and life skills, education, training, and support services. 2. Ability to adequately oversee and supervise crews of youths. 3. Demonstrated ability to network with other organizations and proposed coordination with and use of other available organizational resources. 4. Demonstration of how participation will address currently unmet needs in community. b. Priorities for Transit Ambassadors Program: 1. Ability to deal with the elderly, disabled, and Head-Start populations; 2. Ability to deal with minor emergency medical situations, or to provide training in this area; 3. Knowledge of the types of transportation and the schedules available in the community, such as bus, subway, light rail, and taxis; 4. Procedures for summoning (such as a two-way communication) emergency medical services and police for assistance; 5. Understanding of the community lifestyles; 6. Knowledge of the layout of the community being served, for example, major intersections, street lights, and traffic patterns. 7. Knowledge of the location of destination points such as medical facilities, supermarkets, recreational facilities, etc. c. Priorities for Operation Lifesaver Program: 1. Knowledge of railroad and road network in geographical areas. 2. Demonstrated ability to network with other organizations, including local law enforcement units and proposed coordination and collaboration with other organizations. 3. Ability to coordinate and implement a training and certification program, along with local law enforcement departments, and appropriate education departments. 4. Feasibility of the proposed approach or work plan and the extent to which the project addresses traffic safety objectives. 5. Administrative capabilities and staff expertise required to successfully complete the proposed project. 6. Past and present organizational experience in the performance of similar projects. 7. Ability to provide sound evaluative information. d. Priorities for Hazardous Materials Transportation Assistance Program: 1. Feasibility and utility of work program planned for National Service participants. 2. Ability of program to assist local agencies responsible for hazardous materials planning and training. 3. Ability of program to address the National Service priorities of Environment and Education, and the DOT Strategic Goals of promoting safe and secure transportation and enhancing the environment through wise transportation decisions. 4. Ability of program to address currently unmet hazardous materials needs. 5. Demonstrated strength of current state or local planning and response structure to effectively use national service participation to its full advantage. e. Priorities for Youth Traffic Safety Education Programs: 1. Knowledge of basic traffic safety issues and status of related state and community efforts within designated locality. 2. Demonstrated ability to network with other organizations including local law enforcement units and proposed coordination and collaboration with other organizations. 3. Ability to coordinate and implement a training and certification program along with local law enforcement departments. 4.4 Preferences Applying to Urban Youth Corps Programs Preferences will be given to the following types of projects if urban youth corps are used to implement the projects: a. Projects that will provide long-term public benefits b. Projects that will instill in the participant a work ethic and a sense of public responsibility. c. Projects that will be labor intensive. d. Projects that can be planned and initiated promptly. e. Projects that will provide academic, experiential, or community education opportunities. 5. Funding 5.1 Direct Funding from DOT Funds appropriated to DOT agencies will be available to partially finance initial national and community service projects in some of the five DOT programs in fiscal year 1994 (see individual discussions on funding in the individual DOT Program descriptions set forth in Section 2). These funds also may be allocated to finance portions of projects involving activities in more than one program area. Appropriations for fiscal year 1995, which begins October 1, 1994, are not expected to be enacted until September 1994, and it is not possible to verify the availability of follow-on funding at this time. However, it is anticipated that direct funding of all DOT national and community service Programs identified in this RFP may be available from DOT in future years. Depending on the nature of the proposal and the DOT Program to be implemented, it may be necessary for DOT funding to be given to State or local agencies, which will in turn pass the funding through to the service organization implementing the projects. DOT officials will advise and assist a service organization in arranging such coordination if its proposal is selected, and this coordination should not be viewed as an obstacle to the submission of an application at this time. Other restrictions on the use of Federal funds are discussed in Section 5.4 below. 5.2 National Service Corporation Funding DOT will submit a multi-program application containing all of the selected proposals and related partnership agreements to the National Service Corporation in order to request funding for the remaining program costs that cannot be covered by direct funding from DOT and matching funds from the service organization. Any funding provided by the National Service Corporation will come from the funds earmarked for Federal agencies. Since there is no guarantee that DOT will receive funding from the National Service Corporation, a proposal accepted by DOT ultimately may not be fully funded or funded at all if DOT's request for funding from the National Service Corporation is not granted. 5.3 Matching Funds Each selected applicant must provide matching funds equal to at least 25% of the cost of the program. Where authorized, other federal, state or local sources (not including funds provided directly by DOT or the National Service Corporation) may be counted as matching funds. In- kind contributions, including facilities, equipment, goods or services, may also be counted as matching funds. (In-kind contributions to be used as a match in more that one program must be divided between the programs in proportion to use.) Note that a preference will be given to proposals that provide the match through non-federal sources and matches that exceed the minimum match requirement. 5.4 Restrictions on Use of Federal and Corporation Funds a. Restrictions on Benefits No more than 85% of the living stipend for participants may be paid from federal sources (including funds received from the National Service Corporation and any other federal funds received, including DOT funds). No more than 85% of the costs of the most affordable health care policy that provides minimum benefits may be paid from with National Service Corporation funds. Payment of the 15% of the living stipend from non-federal sources and 15% of health care benefits from non-Corporation sources will be included as part of the overall match for the program. b. Restrictions on Administrative Costs Not more than 5% of the National Service Corporation funds may be used to pay for administrative costs. Administrative costs are costs associated with the overall administration of the program. Such costs include the following: (1) Indirect costs (i.e., costs identified with two or more cost objectives but not identified with a particular cost objective) as described in applicable provisions of Office of Management and Budget Circulars that relate to indirect costs; (2) costs for financial, accounting, or contracting functions; (3) costs for insurance that protects the entity that operates the program; and (4) costs related to the evaluation of the program; and (5) costs for salaries and benefits of staff who recruit, train, place, or supervise participants. Particular costs such as those associated with staff who perform both administrative and program functions may be prorated between administrative costs and costs directly related to program operations. c. Restrictions on Equipment Purchases. Not more than 10% of National Service Corporation funds may be used to purchase equipment to be used for programmatic operation. d. Compliance with OMB Circulars Programs must comply with all applicable Office of Management and Budget circulars for grant management, including Circulars A-133, A-128 and A-110, and with all applicable Federal, State and local laws. Appendix A--Application Form for Proposals for the Department of Transportation National and Community Service Program Proposals for the DOT National and Community Service Program should contain all of the following information and should be submitted in the following format. DOT may need to seek additional information from applicants as a result of changes in the proposed regulations issued by the National Service Corporation or to more fully clarify and define specific proposals. Applications should be double sided, double spaced, and printed in a font size not smaller than 12 points. One unbound copy of the proposal with original signatures suitable for reproduction, plus two bound copies, should be submitted. All pages should be numbered and the specific DOT Program or Programs to be addressed should be identified at the top of each page. All documentation, attachments, or other information pertinent to the application should be included in a single submission, forwarded directly to the address listed below. Proposals should be submitted to: Brenda L. Harris Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization Department of Transportation 400 7th Street SW., room 9410 Washington, DC 20590 Proposals must be received by DOT no later than March 23, 1994, 4 p.m. EST. 1. Title page (to be completed on the attached form identified as ``Attachment 1''), along with a Table of Contents for the proposal. 2. Application summary page, providing a one page overview of the following: a. Identification of which of the five DOT Programs the applicant intends to implement. b. The specific needs to be met, particularly as they relate to the national priorities identified for the individual DOT Program(s). c. Key elements of the program design. d. Recruitment goals, including the percentage of participants (if any) to be drawn from the national recruitment system established by the National Service Corporation. e. Description of the administering organization and identification of primary program partners. 3. Program mission statement and annual objectives (to be completed on the attached form identified as ``Attachment 2''). The National Service Corporation has identified three goals of National Service: a. Community service. Meeting community needs by getting things done through direct and demonstrable service in education, public safety, human needs, and the environment. b. Participant development. Positively impacting participants by developing leadership skills, fostering active, productive citizenship, and enhancing educational opportunities. c. Community building. Strengthening communities by bringing together both institutions and individuals to cooperate in affecting lasting and constructive change. Each applicant will need to articulate a program mission statement that expresses the program's vision and must specify primary objectives to be achieved with respect to each of these three goals. (Applicants should complete three separate forms to address each goal.) More specific directions can be found on the back of the form. 4. Program narrative. In approximately 10 pages, organized and labeled in the stipulated categories, provide the following information in a narrative form with as much specificity as possible. a. DOT program to be addressed. Identify the DOT Program or Programs to be implemented (see section 2 of the RFP). b. Needs to be met and appropriateness for national service. Identify the nature of the specific needs to be met by the proposed national service program, including how and why these needs are appropriately or uniquely addressed by a national service program. (i) Needs --Identify the specific needs that the program will address. --Explain how these needs relate to the priorities and goals of the selected DOT Program. (ii) Process --Describe the process by which the needs were identified. --Explain who was involved in identifying the needs. --Explain the extent to which the residents of the community to be served were involved in the needs assessment. c. Programs design. Describe the concept and design for the program, including the nature of specific service activities to be performed by participants and how these activities address the identified needs and meet the program objectives. (i) Program concept. --Explain the basic concept of the program. --Describe how the program will be structured. --Describe where it will be located. --Describe any institutional or programmatic collaborations or partnerships that will be involved in operating the program, including the extent to which the program builds on existing infrastructure. --Explain how the program will be cost-effective and how participants will be fully and effectively utilized. (ii) Service activities. --Describe the projects or activities that the participants will conduct. --Explain how these projects or activities will result in direct, measurable service that addresses the identified needs. --Describe a typical week in the life of program participants, giving concrete examples of the types of activities or duties participants will perform. (Please note that projects must do more than just keep participants busy, offer temporary solutions, or provide free labor to organizations.) --State the length of time required to complete the projects or activities (must be at least one year and cannot be more than three years) --State an estimated date when the activities could begin. (Note that DOT will inform applicants as to whether they have been selected to receive DOT funding and/or to be included in DOT's application to the National Service Corporation prior to April 15, 1994, and anticipates that notification of awards of National Service Corporation funds will occur in May or June of 1994.) (iii) Relation to need. --Explain how the service activities respond to the identified needs. (iv) Participant training and support. --Explain how participants will be trained, supported, or otherwise prepared for their assignments. --Describe the key elements of the participant training, in-service education, or service-learning curriculum employed to improve participants' skills, prepare them for placement, and foster positive civic values, and promote an ongoing interest in community service. (Note that the program must, in a non-partisan manner, encourage participants to vote.) (v) Participant placement and supervision. --Explain how participants will be placed (in teams or individually) and matched with assignments. --Describe how service sponsors or host-sites will be oriented and prepared for that placement. --Explain how participants will be supervised. --Outline the standards of conduct for participants (all community and national service programs will be required to establish a standard of conduct to be stringently enforced.) (vi) Nondisplacement. --Explain what steps have been taken to ensure that no displacement or supplantation of other employees will occur as a result of the project, or the project will not result in other employees not being hired or not receiving promotions. Include a summary of any discussions or contacts with labor organizations in related fields of work. The written concurrence of any local labor organization representing employees engaged in the same or substantially similar work must be obtained. d. Participant profile, recruitment strategy, and benefits. Provide a description of the total number (full- or part-time) of participants to be recruited in the program, including the expected characteristics, attributes or skills of participants. Describe the benefits these participants will receive. (i) Number and characteristics of participants. --State the expected number and characteristics of participants, including racial or ethnic background, socio-economic status, gender, and educational attainment. --If the program will recruit fewer than 20 participants, please explain why this smaller number is appropriate to the purpose and design of the program. (ii) Participant recruitment. --Explain the methods that will be used or the strategies undertaken to recruit participants. --Explain what measures will be taken to recruit diverse participants based on economic background, race, ethnicity, age, gender, marital status, education levels, and disabilities. (iii) Participant selection. --Explain the methods or strategy that you will use to select participants. --Describe selection criteria, including minimum qualifications for participants. --Identify any specialized skills that participants will be required to possess in order to carry out service assignments. (iv) Participant benefits. --Identify the benefits that the participants will receive. (Note that all participants must receive health benefits and, if needed, child care.) --Describe the amount of the living allowance provided to each participant. (Note that the living allowance must be at least $7,440 for fiscal year 1994 for full-time participants and must be at least $3,960 for each part-time participant, and cannot exceed twice these amounts.) --Describe the amount of the educational awards to be provided to each participant. (Note that proposals should provide for participants to receive educational awards (either from the National Service Corporation or from some other source) in an amount of $4,725 for one full-time term of service or $2,360 for one part-time term of service, for up to two terms of service.) --Describe how national service educational awards will be apportioned among program participants if not provided to all participants. (In general, the distribution should treat equally all participants doing the same or essentially similar work. Distribution based solely on economic needs of participants is not encouraged.) --Describe any alternative post-service benefits that might be used (e.g., tuition credits at an institution of higher education or transition assistance). (v) Participant welfare. --Describe what measures will be taken to ensure the safety and well-being of participants while working on service projects. e. Internal Evaluation and Monitoring Activities. Describe internal evaluation and monitoring activities. (i) Internal evaluation and monitoring. --Explain how you will monitor progress toward your program objectives (Note that monitoring approaches such as community advisory councils, participant advisory councils, peer reviews, quality control inspections, and customer participant surveys are encouraged). --Explain how you will assess, on an ongoing basis, the quality of services and the satisfaction of both the participants and the individuals or institutions served. --Explain how you will collect required descriptive and demographic data (e.g., reporting requirements will include data regarding the characteristics of participants and data regarding services to be conducted in areas of economic or environmental distress.) (ii) Previous evaluations. --If your proposal is to replicate an existing program in other areas, state whether the original program has been evaluated. --Explain who conducted the evaluation and describe the results of the evaluation regarding community and participant impact. --If the original program has not been evaluated, explain what evidence exists of successful performance or of a track record to demonstrate its appropriateness for replication or expansion. f. Institutional and personnel information. Provide a description of the administering organization's past experience and institutional capacity to operate or coordinate a program comparable to the program(s) proposed, including the organization's ability to recruit and train staff. (i) Principal staff. --Describe the background, experience and major accomplishments of the program director and principal staff, and how their qualifications relate to their duties in and responsibilities for the proposed programs. (Attach resumes if appropriate.) --If the staff has not yet been hired, explain what qualifications the candidates must fulfill. --Give a name, address, and telephone number of a contact person for the program who can address any questions about the program. (ii) Training. Describe what kind of orientation and training, if any, will be provided for the staff. (iii) Institutional strengths. Explain what institutional resources or expertise the administering organization(s) provide that will contribute to the overall success of the program. g. Achievement of Transportation Goals. (i) DOT community service goals and objectives. Explain how the program will meet any of the following transportation-related community service goals: --Tie America together through an effective intermodal transportation system; --Promote safe and secure transportation; --Actively enhance our environment through wise transportation decisions; --Put people first in our transportation system by making it relevant and accessible to users. (ii) Consultation with State DOTs and local MPOs. --Consultation with your local Metropolitan Planning Organization (``MPO'') (or State Department of Transportation if you have no local MPO) is highly recommended. Explain in what manner you have consulted with the State DOT and local MPO in developing your proposal. (For information concerning the contact person for your local Metropolitan Planning Organization, please call Ms. Susan Gaskins at 202-366-5781.) --Explain in what way you will involve State DOTs and local MPOs and/or keep them informed as the program progresses. --For projects to be performed under the ``Rehabilitation, Reclamation, and Beautification of Transportation-Related Facilities'' Program, explain what coordination has been conducted with the organization having authority over the relevant transportation facility (such as the State Department of Transportation, the local MPO, the transit authority, etc.) to determine that the project is acceptable. (iii) DOT expertise. Explain to what extent you will use expertise or rely on information provided by the Federal DOT, your State DOT, or other local transportation agency. 5. Budget form page and budget narrative. Complete the provided budget form identified as ``Attachment 3.'' A separate budget form must be completed for each proposal. A budget narrative should be attached to the form with containing any necessary explanatory information. Applicants must identify either on the form or in an attached narrative the source of its matching funds and whether it has a firm commitment for those funds. If activities under two or more DOT Programs are combined in a single proposal, separate budget forms must be completed to show program costs for each DOT Program, along with a separate aggregate budget form for the entire proposal. 6. Assurances Signature Form. Complete the attached form identified as ``Attachment 4.'' 7. Certification Signature Form. Complete the attached form identified as ``Attachment 5.'' 8. State Coordination and Evaluation Form. The proposed regulations issued under the National and Community Service Trust Act require that all community service projects be coordinated with their state community service plan in order to assure that the projects are building on existing programs and that they are not duplicative. Any community service organization submitting a proposal for a DOT Program must show evidence that the proposal has been reviewed and approved by the community service commission for the state in which it is located. Evidence of coordination can be shown by completion of the attached evaluation form (identified as ``Attachment 6'') by the state community service commission, by written correspondence from the state community service commission, or by documentation of a meeting with the state community service commission. In addition, DOT also asks that each proposal include a preliminary evaluation of the project by the state commission on national and community service for the state in which the project will be performed (the ``state commission''). An evaluation form to be completed by the state commission is attached (``Attachment 6''). Evaluations by the state commissions are optional and are not binding on DOT. However, DOT believes that any information from the state commissions would be extremely helpful in our review, and therefore strongly encourages all applicants to obtain an evaluation from their state commission. 9. Standard Form 424 (Request for Federal Assistance). Complete the attached Standard Form 424 identified as ``Attachment 7.'' Please be sure that all forms have been signed by an authorized official who can legally represent the organization. BILLING CODE 4910-62-P ![]()
TN23FE94.013 ![]()
TN23FE94.014 ![]()
TN23FE94.015 ![]()
TN23FE94.016 ![]()
TN23FE94.017 ![]()
TN23FE94.018 ![]()
TN23FE94.019 ![]()
TN23FE94.020 ![]()
TN23FE94.021 ![]()
TN23FE94.022 ![]()
TN23FE94.023 ![]()
TN23FE94.024 ![]()
TN23FE94.025 ![]()
TN23FE94.026 ![]()
TN23FE94.027 ![]()
TN23FE94.028 ![]()
TN23FE94.029 ![]()
TN23FE94.030 ![]()
TN23FE94.031 [FR Doc. 94-4011 Filed 2-22-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-62-C