[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 1994)] [Unknown Section] [Page 0] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-8505] Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 1994 / [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: April 11, 1994] VOL. 59, NO. 69 Monday, April 11, 1994 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food and Nutrition Service 7 CFR Parts 250 and 251 Donation of Foods for Use in the United States, Its Territories and Possessions and Areas Under Its Jurisdiction (Soup Kitchens and Food Banks), and the Emergency Food Assistance Program AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Food Distribution Program Regulations and the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) Regulations to codify previously proposed food distribution provisions contained in the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988 and several nondiscretionary food distribution requirements contained in the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, and the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act Amendments of 1991. The statutory requirements contained in this final rule address: Distribution of additional commodities to emergency feeding organizations, soup kitchens, and food banks; use of Emergency Food Assistance Program administrative funds; State and local maintenance- of-effort requirements; priority in the distribution of commodities to existing networks and organizations under TEFAP; and explicit inclusion of hospitals and facilities caring for needy infants and children as charitable institutions. In addition to codifying provisions contained in the above laws, this final rule implements previously proposed discretionary changes initiated by the Department in order to reduce the administrative burden imposed upon State agencies and to make the Department's regulations more consistent. EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective May 11, 1994. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip K. Cohen, Chief, Program Administration Branch, Food Distribution Division, 3101 Park Center Drive, room 502, Alexandria, Virginia 22302, telephone (703) 305-2662. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Classification Executive Order 12866 This final rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. Regulatory Flexibility Act This action has been reviewed with regard to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). The Administrator of the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) has certified that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Most of the new provisions in this rule affect State agencies. While some of the recipient agencies affected by this rule may be considered ``small entities,'' the cost of compliance with the changes in this rule will be minimal because the time and cost of preparing any paperwork relative to participation will be very limited. Executive Order 12372 These programs are listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under 10.550 and 10.568 and are subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials (7 CFR part 3015, subpart V and the final rule-related notices published at 48 FR 29114, June 24, 1983 and 49 FR 22676, May 31, 1984). Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3507), additional recordkeeping and reporting requirements contained in this final rule are subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget. Current reporting and recordkeeping requirements were approved under Control Number 0584-0293. Statutory Effective Dates The provisions of the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988, Public Law 100-435, on the following subjects were effective September 19, 1988: (1) The distribution of additional commodities for use by emergency feeding organizations, soup kitchens and food banks; (2) the use of TEFAP administrative funds for the costs of providing recipients information on commodity storage and handling; (3) the distribution of commodities that have been donated by persons or entities other than USDA by emergency feeding organizations; (4) the increase in the amount of TEFAP administrative funds passed through by States to emergency feeding organizations from 20 percent to 40 percent; (5) the use of volunteer workers for the distribution of non-USDA commodities by State agencies and emergency feeding organizations; (6) State and local maintenance-of-effort requirements; and (7) the authority for States to give priority to existing networks and organizations that distribute food to low-income households when distributing commodities under TEFAP (as reflected in Secs. 250.3 (definitions of ``soup kitchen'' and ``food bank''), 250.52, 251.3 (definition of ``formula''), 251.4 (c)(3), (h) and (i), 251.6(a)(4), 251.7(a), 251.8(d), 251.10 (e)(7), (g) and (h) of this final rule). The provisions of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, Public Law 101-624, relating to the use of TEFAP administrative funds for repackaging and processing certain commodities and the specific inclusion of hospitals and facilities caring for needy infants and children in the definition of charitable institutions (as reflected in Secs. 251.8(d)(1)(i) and 250.3 (definition of ``charitable institution'') of this final rule) were effective November 28, 1990. The provision of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act Amendments of 1991, Public Law 102-237, establishing a priority system for the distribution of commodities to soup kitchens and food banks (as reflected in Sec. 250.52(a) of this final rule) was effective February 2, 1992. Affected parties should already be complying with the mandates of this legislation. Good Cause Determinations This final rule incorporates several new statutory requirements which were not contained in a prior proposed rule: The nondiscretionary requirements of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, Public Law 101-624, that address the specific inclusion of hospitals and facilities caring for needy infants and children in the definition of charitable institutions, and the allowable use of TEFAP administrative funds to pay costs incurred for the processing and repackaging of TEFAP commodities. It also incorporates the nondiscretionary requirements of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act Amendments of 1991, Public Law 102-237, that establish a priority system for the distribution of section 110 commodities. In light of the nondiscretionary nature of these requirements and since the legislatively mandated effective dates of these requirements were November 28, 1990, and February 1, 1992, respectively, the Administrator of FNS has found, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b), that prior notice and comment are impracticable, unnecessary and contrary to the public interest, and that good cause exists for publishing revisions to Secs. 250.3 (definition of ``charitable institution''), 250.52(a), and 251.8(d)(1)(i) without prior public notice and comment. This final rule also amends Sec. 251.10(e)(2)(ii) to revise the current requirement that monitoring visits of distribution sites must be conducted simultaneously with actual commodity distribution and/or eligibility determinations. It has come to the Department's attention that it is not always possible for reviews to be conducted in a manner that meets this requirement. Accordingly, this rule amends Sec. 251.10(e)(2)(ii) to require that reviews be conducted simultaneously with actual distribution and/or eligibility determinations only to the maximum extent feasible. Since this change serves to reduce the administrative burden currently imposed on State agencies, the Administrator has found, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b), that prior notice and comment are impracticable, unnecessary and contrary to the public interest and that good cause exists for publishing revisions to Sec. 251.10(e)(2)(ii) without prior public notice and comment. Executive Order 12778 This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is intended to have preemptive effect with respect to any State or local laws, regulations or policies which conflict with its provisions or which would otherwise impede its full implementation. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect unless so specified in the ``Effective Date'' section of this preamble. Prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule or the application of its provisions, all applicable administrative procedures must be exhausted. This includes any administrative procedures provided by State or local governments. For disputes involving procurements by distributing and recipient agencies, this includes any administrative appeal procedures to the extent required by 7 CFR Part 3016. Background As stated above, this final rule incorporates into program regulations certain nondiscretionary requirements of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990 (the FACT Act), Public Law 101-624, and the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act Amendments of 1991 (the FACT Act Amendments), Public Law 102-237. With the exception of the provisions relating to the requirements of Public Law 101-624 and Public Law 102-237, and a modification to the monitoring requirement for distribution sites, all provisions of this final rule were published in a proposed rule on April 6, 1990 (55 FR 12838). That proposal and the public comments submitted to the Department on discretionary provisions are discussed below. Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 The FACT Act was enacted on November 28, 1990. The major purposes of Title XVII of the FACT Act were to reauthorize and improve the Food Stamp Program and certain Food Distribution Programs. This rulemaking implements the nondiscretionary provisions contained in the FACT Act that relate to the domestic distribution of commodities. The provisions that affect the Food Stamp Program have been implemented through several separate rulemakings. In addition, separate rulemakings are being promulgated to incorporate the discretionary domestic commodity provisions included in the FACT Act into the Department's regulations. In accordance with the provisions of the FACT Act, this final rule amends current regulations to: (1) Delete the word ``Temporary'' from the title of the Emergency Food Assistance Program; (2) explicitly include hospitals and facilities caring for needy infants and children in the definition of charitable institutions; and (3) permit the use of TEFAP administrative funds to pay costs associated with the processing and repackaging of TEFAP commodities. Following is a detailed discussion of the regulatory changes being made in this final rule to reflect these provisions. Change in Program Name (Part 251) Section 1772(a) of the FACT Act struck the word ``Temporary'' from the title of the authorizing legislation contained in Public Law 98-8 and renamed the short title, ``Title II--Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983.'' In order to avoid confusion during the following discussions, the incorporation of this change in the Department's references to the law, the program name, and the commonly-used acronym need to be clarified. Due to this change, the authorizing legislation will be referred to hereinafter as EFAA instead of TEFAA. In addition, the program's name has changed from the Temporary Emergency Food Assistance Program to the Emergency Food Assistance Program. In response to this legislative change, this final rule changes the title of 7 CFR Part 251 by deleting the word ``Temporary.'' However, the Department has decided to continue to use the program's original acronym, TEFAP, and now will refer to ``the Emergency Food Assistance Program'' whenever the acronym needs to be established. Charitable Institution Definition (Sec. 250.3) Section 1771(b) of the FACT Act amended section 4(a) of the Agriculture and Consumer Protection Act of 1973 (Public Law 93-86; 7 U.S.C. 612c note) and section 416(a)(3) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1431(a)(3)) to explicitly include hospitals and facilities caring for needy infants and children in the category of institutions eligible for commodity donations under these authorities. While these institutions are, by definition, eligible to receive donations as charitable institutions under current regulations, Sec. 250.3 of this final rule is nonetheless being amended to specifically identify these institutions in the definition of charitable institutions. Repackaging and Processing Costs (Sec. 251.8(d)(1)(i)) Section 1772(d) of the FACT Act amended section 204 of the EFAA to permit emergency feeding organizations to use TEFAP administrative funds to pay costs associated with the repackaging and processing of USDA commodities that are made available under the EFAA and section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988 (Hunger Prevention Act). This final rule revises Sec. 251.8(d)(1)(i) to incorporate this nondiscretionary legislative mandate. For further discussion of this provision, please refer to ``Restructuring of Administrative Cost Provisions'' later in this preamble. Hunger Prevention Act of 1988 In addition to certain nondiscretionary provisions in the FACT Act and the FACT Act Amendments, this final rule incorporates certain requirements contained in the Hunger Prevention Act. The major purposes of the Hunger Prevention Act are to require the Secretary to purchase additional commodities for distribution to low-income households, improve the Child Nutrition and Food Stamp Programs, and provide other hunger relief to needy households and the homeless. The commodity provisions contained in the Hunger Prevention Act were addressed in a proposed rule amending Parts 250 and 251 which was published in the Federal Register on April 6, 1990 (55 FR 12838). The proposed rule addressed the commodity provisions contained in the Hunger Prevention Act relative to: (1) The distribution of additional commodities for use by emergency feeding organizations, soup kitchens, and food banks; (2) the use of TEFAP administrative funds to pay for the costs of providing information on commodity storage and handling to recipients; (3) the distribution of commodities that have been donated by persons or entities other than USDA by emergency feeding organizations; (4) the increase in the amount of administrative funding to be passed through by States to emergency feeding organizations from 20 percent to 40 percent; (5) the use of volunteer workers and distribution of non-USDA commodities by State agencies and emergency feeding organizations; (6) State and local maintenance-of-effort requirements; and (7) the authority for States to give priority to existing networks and organizations that distribute food to low-income households when distributing commodities under TEFAP. The proposed rule also addressed certain discretionary changes to provisions in part 251 which: (1) Reduced the required TEFAP monitoring by State agencies; (2) clarified the State matching requirements for TEFAP administrative funds; (3) included references to 7 CFR part 3016; and (4) changed reference to the form used to report State and local TEFAP costs. The proposed rule afforded the general public 60 days in which to comment. A total of 37 comment letters were received on the proposed rule. Respondents represented 14 State agencies, 2 cities, 2 counties and 19 interested groups. Despite general support of the proposed rule, the following issues were raised by some commenters: Limitations on the distribution of section 110 soup kitchen/food bank commodities resulting from the Hunger Prevention Act's definition of food banks and soup kitchens; the organization of regulations pertaining to the administration and distribution of soup kitchen/food bank commodities obtained under section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act; authorization for the Secretary to establish procedures which allow non-USDA commodities to be used to supplement USDA commodities; and the decrease in the monitoring for emergency feeding organizations. The remainder of this preamble discusses the provisions contained in the proposed rule, the comments received in response to that rule, and the Department's response to the comments on discretionary provisions as implemented through this final rule. For a more comprehensive understanding of the provisions contained in this final rule, the reader should refer to the preamble of the proposed rule. Additional Commodities Additional TEFAP Commodities (Sec. 251.4(h)) Section 104 of the Hunger Prevention Act amended the EFAA to add sections 213 and 214. Section 214 required the Secretary to spend $120 million to purchase, process and distribute additional commodities during each of Fiscal Years 1989 and 1990. Paragraph (a) of section 213 mandated that these commodities be provided to States for distribution to emergency feeding organizations. Section 1772 of the FACT Act extended the Secretary's authority to purchase additional commodities for distribution through TEFAP through Fiscal Year 1995. In order to clarify the eligibility of emergency feeding organizations to receive these commodities, a new paragraph (h) was added to Sec. 251.4 in the proposed rule. Commenters did not oppose this provision. Since section 1772(g) of the FACT Act, enacted subsequent to the proposed rule, extended the Secretary's purchase authority through Fiscal Year 1995, the provisions contained in paragraph (h) of Sec. 251.4 of the proposed rule relative to the types of additional TEFAP commodities emergency feeding organizations are eligible to receive have been retained in this final rule. In addition, section 105(c) of the Hunger Prevention Act amended section 203B(a) of the EFAA to grant States the option, when allocating TEFAP commodities within the State, to give priority to existing food bank networks and other organizations whose ongoing primary function is to facilitate the distribution of food to low-income households. This provision was included in Sec. 251.4(h) of the proposed rule, and is retained this final rule. Section 110 Commodities for Soup Kitchens/Food Banks Section 110(c) of the Hunger Prevention Act required the Secretary to purchase, process, and distribute additional commodities to States. The Hunger Prevention Act authorized the distribution of these commodities to soup kitchens and food banks in addition to the commodities otherwise made available to these organizations. Section 1774(a) of the FACT Act amended section 110 to extend the Secretary's authority to purchase additional commodities for distribution to these organizations, and provided that there are authorized to be appropriated $40 million for each of Fiscal Years 1992 through 1995. However, only $32 million was appropriated for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993. The specific provisions relative to the distribution of these commodities as they were proposed and the comments received are discussed in detail below. Organization of Regulations A few comments were received concerning the proposed placement of the provisions regarding the distribution of the section 110 commodities in both parts 250 and 251. Commenters expressed concern that the separation of regulations led to confusion and unnecessary delays in administering the program in cases where the State agency responsible for distributions to charitable institutions was not also the State agency administering TEFAP. Two commenters recommended the consolidation of all regulations regarding section 110 commodities in the TEFAP regulations (part 251). It should be noted that section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act did not amend the EFAA; thus, the distribution of commodities under this section is not directly a part of TEFAP. Therefore the Department decided, in implementing the legislation, to treat food banks and soup kitchens that serve the needy with section 110 commodities as recipient agencies under the Food Distribution Program regulations (part 250). Conversely, authorization for the receipt of TEFAP administrative funds by institutions receiving section 110 commodities is contained in section 204(a)(1) of the EFAA. Thus, for administrative funding purposes, these institutions are considered emergency feeding organizations and are governed by TEFAP regulations (part 251). In addition, part 251 contains certain requirements which are not appropriate for soup kitchens and food banks receiving section 110 commodities. Such provisions in part 251 include requiring individual certification of recipients and certain recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Rather than include all regulations regarding section 110 commodities in part 251 along with a host of exceptions to existing regulations that do not apply, the Department will continue to address the section 110 provisions as appropriate through both parts 250 and 251. Since implementation of the provisions of the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988, it has been brought to the Department's attention that there is considerable confusion relating to the structure of the proposed regulations resulting from the fact that many soup kitchens and food banks receive commodities through both the Department's donations to charitable institutions and through section 110. As indicated above, the Department will continue to address provisions for outlets receiving section 110 commodities through both parts 250 and 251. However, for the purpose of clarification, this final rule has been restructured to move all of the provisions for the receipt of section 110 commodities from Sec. 250.41 to new Sec. 250.52. For commodities received through the Department's donations to charitable institutions, soup kitchens and food banks must continue to comply with the provisions of Sec. 250.41; for section 110 commodities, the provisions of the new Sec. 250.52 will apply. Requirements relating to soup kitchens and food banks receiving TEFAP administrative funds will continue to be addressed in part 251. The specific provisions contained in Sec. 250.52 are discussed in further detail below. Definition of Eligible Institutions (Secs. 250.3 and 250.52(a)) The Hunger Prevention Act specifically defines the types of food banks and soup kitchens that are eligible to receive commodities purchased under section 110. In section 110(b)(3), the Hunger Prevention Act defines ``food bank'' as ``public and charitable institutions that maintain an established operation involving the provision of food or edible commodities, or the products thereof, to food pantries, soup kitchens, hunger relief centers, or other food or feeding centers that provide meals or food to needy persons on a regular basis as an integral part of their normal activities.'' In section 110(b)(6), the Hunger Prevention Act defines ``soup kitchen'' as ``public and charitable institutions that maintain an established feeding operation to provide food to needy homeless persons on a regular basis as an integral part of their normal activities.'' Section 110(e)(2)(A) of the Hunger Prevention Act further specifies that in determining the amount of commodities that will be accepted by soup kitchens and food banks, States shall give priority to institutions that provide ``meals'' to homeless individuals. The proposed rule incorporated the definitions of ``soup kitchen'' and ``food bank'' and the procedures for distributing section 110 commodities to these organizations in Sec. 250.41(d). While the Hunger Prevention Act clearly defines ``food bank'' and ``soup kitchen'' and stipulates that section 110 commodities are to be directed to the needy and homeless, several commenters opposed the Department's proposed implementation of its provisions. Three commenters rejected the regulatory proposal that commodities be distributed only to soup kitchens and food banks as defined by the Hunger Prevention Act. Their principal concern was that many rural areas do not have access to food bank networks or soup kitchens and thus would be excluded from receiving the additional commodities authorized under section 110. One commenter recommended that ``food pantries'' be eligible to receive commodities in areas where soup kitchens and food bank warehouses do not exist. Another suggested that alcohol treatment centers and domestic violence shelters should be considered eligible for section 110 commodities on the basis that without the services of these agencies, their clients could potentially be homeless. Only two commenters supported the limitation of distribution of section 110 commodities to soup kitchens and food banks that provide meals to homeless individuals. Subsequent to the publication of the proposed rule, Congress passed the FACT Act. Section 1774(a)(2)(B) defines ``food pantry'' as ``a public or private nonprofit organization that distributes food to low- income and unemployed households, including food from sources other than the Department of Agriculture, to relieve situations of emergency and distress.'' Section 1774(a)(3) of the FACT Act addressed the unintended exclusion of some States which have food pantries rather than food banks by allowing distribution to food pantries in some instances. Since the Department intends to exercise some discretion in implementing this provision, the distribution of section 110 commodities to food pantries will be addressed in a separate proposed rule. However, since section 1774(a) became effective on February 1, 1992, affected State distributing agencies should already be complying with this statutory requirement. On December 13, 1991, Congress passed the FACT Act Amendments, Public Law 102-237. Section 922(a)(2) of Public Law 102-237 amended section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act to establish a priority system for the distribution of these commodities, which at least partially addresses the above comments. As discussed below, this final rule reflects the priority distribution system set forth in Public Law 102- 237. The remaining commodity provisions contained in Public Law 102-237 will be addressed through a separate proposed rulemaking. The priority system for the distribution of section 110 commodities presented in this final rule increases the number and types of institutions eligible to receive and distribute these commodities. However, as required by statute, Sec. 250.52(a)(1) of this final rule continues to mandate that distributing agencies give first priority in the distribution of these commodities to soup kitchens, as defined in Sec. 250.3, and other like organizations that serve meals to homeless persons, and to food banks for distribution to such organizations. If distributing agencies determine that they will not likely exhaust their allocation of section 110 commodities through distribution to this first priority group, the distributing agency must make the remaining commodities available to food banks for distribution to the second priority group, institutions that distribute commodities to the needy. Eligibility to receive the commodities for household consumption from such institutions must be established through a means test as determined appropriate by the distributing agency. If a food bank determines that it will not likely exhaust its allocation of section 110 commodities through distribution to this second priority group, it may distribute the remaining commodities to institutions that serve meals to needy individuals but whose programs do not use a means test as part of their eligibility criteria, provided that such organizations have documented, to the satisfaction of the food bank, that they do, in fact, serve predominantly needy persons. Examples of this third priority group include domestic violence shelters, child care centers and alcohol rehabilitation centers. Section 250.52(a) of this final rule is revised to provide for the distribution of section 110 commodities in accordance with the priority system described above. In addition, the definitions of ``food bank'' and ``soup kitchen'' have been deleted from this section and incorporated in Sec. 250.3, ``Definitions,'' for the purpose of consistency. Tax-Exempt Status (Sec. 250.52(b)) Sections 250.41(d)(2)(ii) and 250.41(d)(3)(ii) of the proposed rule required that soup kitchens and food banks must have obtained recognition of tax-exempt status, or have applied for, and be moving toward, obtaining recognition of their tax-exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service, or be currently operating a Federal program requiring nonprofit status. The proposed rule would allow them 12 months to receive recognition of Federal tax-exempt status. No comments were received opposing this provision. Thus, it is retained in Sec. 250.52(b) of this final rule with minor revisions emphasizing recognition of tax-exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service and clarifying that the 12-month grace period runs from the effective date of the organization's approval for participation, not from the date of filing with the Internal Revenue Service, and that documentation of recognition of tax-exempt status must be not only obtained, but also forwarded to the State distributing agency, within that period. So as not to penalize soup kitchens or food banks for delays which are beyond their control, when a soup kitchen or food bank has not received a decision on its application for tax-exempt status in the required 12- month period, Sec. 250.52(b) of this final rule also permits such an organization to continue participation in the program if the distributing agency determines that it has provided sufficient documentation of compliance with all IRS requirements and provided information to IRS in a timely manner. Participation Data and Household Distribution (Sec. 250.52(c)(2)) The proposed rule recognized that soup kitchens, unlike certain other types of charitable institutions, have been established for the specific purpose of providing assistance to the indigent. Thus, the Department believes that it is reasonable to assume that individuals seeking a meal at a soup kitchen are needy. Based on this premise, Sec. 250.41(d)(2)(iii) of the proposed rule provided for the distribution of section 110 commodities on the basis of the number of meals expected to be served daily, as submitted by the soup kitchen or food bank that has an agreement with the State and approved or adjusted by the distributing agency, rather than using the detailed formula required for other charitable institutions. Sections 250.41(d)(3)(iii) (A) and (B) of the proposed rule also provided that distributing agencies must base the distribution of commodities to food banks on: (1) The number of meals to be served daily in a congregate meal setting by institutions receiving commodities from the food bank; and (2) the number of needy households that meet the State's eligibility criteria for participation in TEFAP that will be provided food for home consumption by such institutions. Given that commenters did not oppose these provisions, the provision concerning the number of congregate meals projected to be served is retained in Sec. 250.52(c)(2)(i) of this final rule as proposed, with certain technical changes to clarify that projections must contain the number of days that meals will be served during the agreement period. The provision concerning household distribution is contained in Sec. 250.52(c)(2)(ii) of this final rule with a change to the eligibility determination. In instances in which section 110 commodities are made available for distribution to households, Sec. 250.41(d)(3)(iii)(C) of the proposed rule required food banks to ensure that organizations receiving the commodities distribute them only to households which meet the eligibility criteria established by the State pursuant to Sec. 251.5(b) of the TEFAP regulations. However, section 922(a) of Public Law 102-237 amended section 110(j)(2) of the Hunger Prevention Act to authorize institutions that distribute commodities to the needy for home consumption to determine eligibility through a means test that has been determined appropriate by the distributing agency. Thus, the State need not require the same eligibility criteria it has established for TEFAP. Sections 250.52 (c)(2)(ii) and (c)(6)(ii) of this final rule have been revised to reflect this current legislative provision. Section 250.41(d)(3)(iii) of the proposed rule also required that food banks ensure that organizations distributing section 110 commodities to households comply with the provisions contained in Sec. 251.10(f) concerning the limitation on unrelated activities (e.g., recipients cannot be required to register to vote as a condition for receiving USDA commodities). Since commenters did not oppose this provision, it has been retained in Sec. 250.52(c)(6)(i) of this final rule. Allocation of Additional Commodities by the Department Section 214 of the EFAA and section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act require the Secretary to allocate, on an annual basis, the additional TEFAP and soup kitchen/food bank commodities to States based on a formula that takes into account each State's population of low- income and unemployed persons as percentages of the national totals. Each State's share of commodities must be based 60 percent on the number of households within the State which have incomes below the poverty line and 40 percent on the average monthly number of unemployed persons within the State. These sections also require that such additional commodities be allocated among States on the basis of value. Soup Kitchen/Food Bank Commodities (Sec. 250.52(d)(1)) In accordance with the legislative provisions described above, Sec. 250.41(d)(4)(i) of the proposed rule incorporated the allocation formula and provided for the annual allocation, based on value, of section 110 commodities by the Department. TEFAP Commodities (Secs. 251.3 and 251.7(a)) The definition of ``formula'' was revised in Sec. 251.3 of the proposed rule to more closely follow the wording relative to the 60/40 formula contained in section 214 of the EFAA and to clarify that surplus commodities made available for distribution through TEFAP will continue to be allocated based on the amount of commodities in pounds while the purchased commodities will be allocated based on value. In addition, Sec. 251.7(a) of the proposed rule was revised to provide for the allocation formula of the purchased commodities to be adjusted once a year. Comments in response to the provisions contained in the proposed rule relative to the Department's allocation of section 110 and TEFAP commodities addressed the use of the 60/40 formula. Two commenters supported the use of the 60/40 formula, whereas one commenter expressed concern that current allocations are based on 1980 poverty statistics and stated that more up-to-date information should be utilized when making allocations. Although the Census is conducted once every 10 years, it represents the best available source of national data on low- income persons. Since no better data base is available, the Department must accept the limitations resulting from the relative infrequency of the Census. It should be noted, however, that the program allocation data base has been updated based on the results of the 1990 Census. Until such time as the Department identifies the existence of data more appropriate for use in allocating TEFAP and section 110 commodities, the allocation formula described in Secs. 251.3, 251.7(a) and 250.52(d)(1) of this final rule will continue to be used. Allocation of Section 110 Commodities by States (Sec. 250.52(d)(3)) Section 250.41(d)(4)(iii) of the proposed rule required State distributing agencies to use the data reported in the agreement by soup kitchens and food banks to allocate section 110 commodities. This section of the proposed rule also required that section 110 commodities be allocated in a manner that ensures that commodities will not be made available in quantities that are in excess of anticipated use or the ability of the organization to accept and store the commodities. Since no comments were received concerning this provision, it is retained in Sec. 250.52(d)(3) of this final rule with language clarifying that the distributing agency may critically review and adjust the estimates as appropriate. Reallocation of Additional Commodities (Secs. 250.52(d)(4) and 251.3) When a State determines that it will not accept all of its share of the additional TEFAP commodities, section 214(g) of the EFAA, as added by section 104 of the Hunger Prevention Act, requires the Department to reallocate these commodities on the basis of the same 60/40 formula that is used for the initial allocation. Section 251.3 of the proposed rule expanded the definition of ``formula'' to include the reallocation requirement. This final rule retains the definition as proposed. When a State determines that it will not accept all of its share of section 110 commodities, section 110(e) of the Hunger Prevention Act requires the Department to reallocate these commodities in a fair and equitable manner among States that have already accepted the full amount of their allocation and have requested additional amounts. This procedure for reallocating section 110 commodities was included in Sec. 250.41(d)(4)(iv) of the proposed rule. One commenter suggested that the Department set aside a particular month of the year to make reallocations to afford each soup kitchen/ food bank the opportunity to plan ahead accordingly. Unfortunately, this recommendation is not feasible. Often the commodities have been purchased for the proximate shipping period, forcing the Department to reallocate commodities turned back by States immediately. Thus, the proposed reallocation formula is retained without modification in Sec. 250.52(d)(4) of this final rule. The Department will continue to review its procurement methods so that reallocations can be as responsive to State planning needs as possible. Notification of Acceptance of Additional Commodities (Secs. 250.52(d)(2) and 251.4(c)(3)) Section 214(g) of the EFAA and section 110(e) of the Hunger Prevention Act require that each State promptly notify the Secretary when it has determined that it will not accept any or all of its allocation of the additional TEFAP or section 110 commodities. So that reallocations can be made and deliveries can be arranged in a timely manner, Secs. 250.41(d)(4)(ii) and 251.4(c)(3) of the proposed rule required State agencies to notify the Department at least 30 days prior to the shipping period of the amount of the commodities which they will accept. Since no comments were received in response to these provisions, they are retained in Secs. 250.52(d)(2) and 251.4(c)(3) of this final rule as proposed, with clarification that the requirement for notification applies to the beginning of the shipping period. State Maintenance-of-Effort Requirement (Secs. 250.52(f) and 251.10(h)) Section 214(i) of the EFAA, as added by section 104 of the Hunger Prevention Act, prohibits a State which uses its own funds to provide commodities or services to organizations receiving funds or services under that section from diminishing the level of support it provides to such organizations or from reducing the amount of funds available for other nutrition programs in the State in each fiscal year. This provision was incorporated in Sec. 251.10(h) of the proposed rule, and is retained in the final rule. The proposed rule also incorporated the requirement in section 110(h)(3) of the Hunger Prevention Act that local agencies receiving section 110 commodities provide assurance to the State that donations of food from other sources will not be diminished as a result of the receipt of the section 110 commodities. To implement this provision, Sec. 250.41(d)(6) of the proposed rule required that distributing agencies obtain this assurance from each institution prior to making commodities available. The proposed rule mandated that this assurance be provided in writing and maintained on file by the distributing agency. Commenters did not oppose this method for ensuring compliance with the Hunger Prevention Act. Thus, the provision is retained in Sec. 250.52(f) of this final rule. Emergency Food Assistance Program Administrative Funds Allowable Costs Administrative Costs for Additional Commodities (Secs. 250.52(e), 251.6(a)(4), 251.8(d) (1) and (2), and 251.10(e)(7)) Section 204(a)(1) of the EFAA, as amended by section 105 of the Hunger Prevention Act, authorizes States and emergency feeding organizations to use TEFAP administrative funds to pay costs associated with the distribution of commodities provided under section 214 of the EFAA and section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act. Section 250.41(d)(5) of the proposed rule included this provision and required that soup kitchens and food banks receiving foods under section 110 enter into a TEFAP agreement in order to receive TEFAP administrative funds for costs associated with the distribution of section 110 commodities. Commenters did not oppose this requirement. The Department believes that this arrangement will ensure accountability by applying the same requirements for the use of all TEFAP administrative funds, whether used by traditional TEFAP emergency feeding organizations or soup kitchens/food banks. In addition, this will mean that funds provided to soup kitchens and food banks may be counted toward the amount of TEFAP funds a State agency is required to pass through to emergency feeding organizations in accordance with the provisions contained in Sec. 251.8(d)(3)(i). This requirement is retained in Sec. 250.52(e) of this final rule with minor revisions. The provision allowing the use of TEFAP funds to cover the costs associated with the distribution of section 110 commodities was also included in Sec. 251.8(d)(1) of the proposed rule. As stated in the proposed rule, the Department will continue to make all TEFAP administrative funds available only to the TEFAP State agencies. When it is determined that TEFAP administrative funds will be made available to pay costs associated with the distribution of section 110 commodities and the State agency responsible for TEFAP is not also responsible for the distribution of section 110 commodities, Sec. 251.8(d)(1) of the proposed rule required the TEFAP State agency to enter into an agreement with the entity which will receive and, if applicable, allocate the TEFAP funds in connection with section 110 commodities. This agreement would be with either: (1) The soup kitchens or food banks; or (2) the distributing agency responsible for the distribution of section 110 commodities, which would in turn enter into a TEFAP agreement with each soup kitchen and food bank. The proposed rule provided for the agreement to be in the form of the TEFAP agreement currently being used for emergency feeding organizations or an amended charitable institution agreement which requires compliance with Sec. 251.8, which governs the use of TEFAP administrative funds, and Secs. 251.10 (a) (records) and (e) (State monitoring). The administration of TEFAP funds allotted to a State becomes more complicated when the State agency responsible for TEFAP is not the agency responsible for the distribution of section 110 commodities. As stated in the proposed rule, when TEFAP funds will be made available to pay costs associated with the distribution of section 110 commodities, it will be the responsibility of the two State agencies to determine how to allocate TEFAP administrative funds between the State agencies and among the emergency feeding organizations, including any soup kitchens/food banks with TEFAP agreements. To ensure proper monitoring of the distribution of TEFAP funds within the State, Sec. 251.6(a)(4) of the proposed rule required TEFAP State agencies to describe in the State plan how these funds will be allocated between State agencies and among emergency feeding organizations, including soup kitchens and food banks. In addition, Sec. 251.10(e)(7) of the proposed rule required TEFAP State agencies to ensure that emergency feeding organizations receiving funds for the distribution of section 110 commodities are reviewed to ensure compliance with the provisions contained in Sec. 251.8. Most commenters supported the proposed regulations on the payment of funds for storage and distribution costs, and the need for States to enter into agreements with organizations receiving section 110 commodities and to describe the allocation of funds in their plan. Thus, the requirements described above are retained, as proposed, in Secs. 251.6(a)(4), 251.8(d)(2) and 251.10(e)(7) of this final rule with minor clarifying changes. Due to commenter concern about the difficulty of administering one program through two State agencies, the Department would like to emphasize that States have the authority to structure the administration and distribution of section 110 commodities in the fashion they deem most efficient and accountable. The Department recognizes that there may be some dissension among State agencies regarding the allocation of funds. As stated in the preamble to the proposed rule, when the allocation of these funds cannot be mutually agreed upon by the State agencies, the Department anticipates that the necessary decisions will be made by the Governor's office. Administrative Costs for Non-USDA Commodities (Secs. 251.8(d) (1)(ii) and (2)(ii)) Section 102 of the Hunger Prevention Act added a new section 203D(b) to the EFAA, which authorizes States and emergency feeding organizations to use funds made available under the EFAA to pay costs incurred for the storage, handling and distribution of commodities which have been donated by persons or entities other than USDA. Section 251.8(d)(1) of the proposed rule incorporated this provision, and is retained in Secs. 251.8(d) (1)(ii) and (2)(ii) of this final rule with certain clarifying changes which are described below. Costs of Providing Information to Recipients (Sec. 251.8(d)(1)(i)) Section 109(c) of the Hunger Prevention Act amended section 204(a)(2) of the EFAA to permit emergency feeding organizations to use TEFAP funds to cover the costs of providing information on the appropriate storage and preparation of USDA commodities to persons participating in TEFAP. This provision was included in Sec. 251.8(d)(3) of the proposed rule, and is retained in the final rule, although it has been moved to Sec. 251.8(d)(1)(i). This provision is discussed in more detail below. Restructuring of Administrative Cost Provisions (Secs. 251.3 (Definition of ``Storage and Distribution Costs'') and 251.8(d)) Currently, the allowable uses of TEFAP administrative funds are set forth in Sec. 251.3(f) in the definition of ``storage and distribution costs.'' Now that TEFAP administrative funds may be used not only in connection with TEFAP commodities, but also in connection with both section 110 commodities and other commodities under varying circumstances, a single definition setting forth the allowable uses of these funds has become awkward. In order to clarify the administrative costs for which TEFAP administrative funds may be used, the definition of ``storage and distribution costs'' has been removed from this final rule, and Sec. 251.8(d) has been restructured to perform the now more complex function previously served by the definition. The EFAA does not explicitly authorize the use of TEFAP administrative funds to pay administrative costs associated with USDA commodities other than those provided under TEFAP and section 110. A requirement that reimbursable administrative costs associated with TEFAP and section 110 commodities be separated from costs generated in the management of USDA commodities received from other sources would impose a burden on many local program operators which they could not reasonably be expected to meet. This burden would make commodity distribution more difficult without any compensatory increase in either the quality of service to participants or program accountability. Typically, local organizations receive commodities from several sources. For example, a soup kitchen receiving commodities under section 110 may also get commodities as a charitable institution, as well as donations from non-USDA sources. Some USDA commodities received under different authorities are identical in type and package size, and thus cannot be distinguished from each other unless segregated upon receipt so as to be able to identify storage costs by commodity source. Furthermore, it would be burdensome for local organizations to record the staff time spent handling USDA commodities received under different legislative authorities so as to assure that only time devoted to TEFAP and section 110 commodities is reimbursed with TEFAP administrative funds. Therefore, permitting local organizations to use such funding to handle section 110 commodities, but not the USDA commodities they receive as charitable institutions, would be unreasonable. It would also be illogical to permit the use of TEFAP administrative funds for the storage, handling, and distribution of non-USDA commodities, as the EFAA clearly does, while prohibiting the use of funds for the same costs associated with USDA commodities not provided under TEFAP or section 110. By allowing those costs associated with the storage, handling, and distribution of non-USDA commodities, as well as TEFAP and section 110 commodities, we believe the EFAA intended to streamline commodity management at the local level. Therefore, the Department believes that it is fully within the intent of Congress, as well as prudent from a management perspective, to allow TEFAP administrative funds to be used for the same categories of costs for all USDA commodities received by organizations participating in TEFAP or receiving section 110 commodities. This policy would include the costs of processing and repackaging all USDA commodities, regardless of the authority under which they are provided. Thus, Sec. 251.8(d)(1)(i) of the final rule consolidates the allowable uses of TEFAP administrative funds in connection with the distribution of USDA commodities. This section contains the allowable uses previously contained in the definition of ``storage and distribution costs,'' incorporates the addition of repackaging and processing costs as allowable administrative costs in connection with all USDA commodities received by organizations which get commodities under TEFAP or section 110, and includes the provision from Sec. 251.8(d)(3) of the proposed rule authorizing emergency feeding organizations to use TEFAP administrative funds to pay costs incurred for providing information to recipients relative to the appropriate storage and preparation of USDA commodities. Section 251.8(d)(1)(ii) of the final rule provides that TEFAP administrative funds may also be used for the direct costs associated with the intrastate distribution of non-USDA commodities. This section further makes clear that such costs are limited to the costs of storing, handling and distributing these commodities and that State- level expenditures are allowable only for costs associated with commodities which are ultimately distributed by emergency feeding organizations or soup kitchens/food banks receiving TEFAP administrative funds. These restrictions are necessary to comply with the limitations in section 203D(b) of the EFAA, which authorizes the use of TEFAP administrative funds in connection with non-USDA commodities. A related provision in Sec. 251.8(d)(2)(i) of the final rule requires local organizations to have entered into an agreement pursuant to Sec. 251.2(c) (for the receipt of TEFAP commodities) or Sec. 251.8(d)(2)(ii) (for the receipt of administrative funds in connection with the distribution of section 110 commodities) in order to be eligible to receive TEFAP funds for non-USDA commodities. Finally, the provisions from proposed Sec. 251.8(d)(1) regarding the agreements necessary for soup kitchens/food banks to receive TEFAP administrative funds for section 110 commodity distribution are moved to Sec. 251.8(d)(2), and references to ``storage and distribution costs'' throughout the regulation have been changed to ``administrative costs'' to reflect the broader uses of TEFAP administrative funds now permitted. Distribution Charges (Sec. 251.8(d)(3)(ii)) One commenter was concerned that proposed Sec. 251.8(d)(2)(ii) would prohibit States with commercial distribution systems from charging a fee to soup kitchens for the storage and handling of section 110 commodities. The Department appreciates the commenter's request for clarification. Proposed Sec. 251.8(d)(2)(ii) prohibited State agencies from charging for commodities made available to emergency feeding organizations. However, this prohibition does not apply to instances in which State agencies provide section 110 commodities to soup kitchens and food banks. Confusion regarding this regulation stems from the ``dual identity'' soup kitchens and food banks have when they receive section 110 commodities: For purposes of eligibility to receive TEFAP administrative funding, they are considered to be emergency feeding organizations; for all other purposes, they are classified as recipient agencies. Thus, State agencies may charge soup kitchens and food banks for costs incurred at the State level for intrastate transportation and storage of section 110 commodities as long as State agencies comply with the provisions in Sec. 250.15(a)(2) governing fees for recipient agencies. Section 251.8(d)(3)(ii) of this final rule makes clear that the prohibition on fees applies only to commodities made available under Part 251. Local Support (Sec. 251.8(d)(3)(i)) Section 103(b) of the Hunger Prevention Act amended Sec. 204(a)(2) of the EFAA to increase the percentage of Federal TEFAP administrative funds which must be made available to, or expended on behalf of, emergency feeding organizations from 20 percent to 40 percent. Section 251.8(d)(3) of this final rule also clarifies that the 40 percent pass-through should not be applied to the amount of funds provided to each State agency; rather, the requirement applies to the total TEFAP grant of the State. When TEFAP administrative funds are made available to pay costs associated with the distribution of section 110 commodities, and the State agency administering TEFAP is not the agency responsible for the distribution of section 110 commodities, the TEFAP State agency is responsible for ensuring that the 40-percent requirement is met. If the TEFAP State agency makes funds available to the State agency responsible for section 110 commodities, only the amount of funds ultimately provided to emergency feeding organizations, or used to pay costs on their behalf, may count toward the State's 40- percent requirement. Any funds retained by the distributing agency to pay State-level administrative costs associated with the distribution of section 110 commodities must be matched in accordance with the provisions contained in Sec. 251.9(a). For the purpose of clarification, Sec. 251.8(d)(2)(i) of the proposed rule was also amended to reference ``Federal Temporary Emergency Food Assistance Program administrative funds'' in lieu of ``State funds.'' No comments were received in response to this change, which more accurately describes the funds in question. Since this clarification will help to ensure that 40 percent of the ``Federal'' grant is passed on to emergency feeding organizations or expended on their behalf, the term ``Federal Emergency Food Assistance Program administrative funds'' is retained in Sec. 251.8(d)(3)(i) of this final rule with the following changes: (1) Deletion of the word ``Temporary,'' (2) use of the term ``administrative costs'' rather than ``storage and distribution costs,'' and (3) restructuring of the paragraph for the sake of clarity. State Matching Requirement (Secs. 251.9(a) and 251.9(c)) The proposed rule amended Sec. 251.9(a) to clarify that the portion of the TEFAP grant the State is required to match is that portion which is retained by the State agency to pay State-level storage and distribution costs. No comments were received concerning the clarifying language. Thus, Sec. 251.9(a) of this final rule is retained as proposed with a change in terminology from ``storage and distribution costs'' to ``administrative costs.'' An area of concern during development of the proposed rule involved a limitation on the types of State expenditures which meet the matching requirements for TEFAP. Section 204(a)(4) of the EFAA requires States to match the portion of Federal TEFAP funds which is retained by the State to pay State-level administrative costs. This section also prohibits States from passing the cost of the matching requirements on to emergency feeding organizations. In Sec. 251.9(c) of the current regulations, the Department limits the types of contributions which may count toward the match to contributions (cash or in-kind) for costs which could otherwise be allowable as State-level administrative costs. It was pointed out that this provision prohibited States from counting two types of State expenditures toward meeting the match: (1) State- appropriated funds which were used to pay local-level costs associated with the distribution of commodities; and (2) any in-kind contributions made by the State agency to an emergency feeding organization. The Department re-evaluated this provision together with Department-wide rules describing allowable contributions toward matching requirements. The proposed rule eliminated the restriction in Sec. 251.9(c) that any contributions to the matching requirement be limited to State-level storage and distribution costs. Two commenters supported this revision; none opposed it. Thus, as proposed, Sec. 251.9(c) of this final rule allows the following contributions to be counted toward meeting the match: Any cash outlay of the State agency specifically identifiable as an allowable State- or local-level administrative cost, including the outlay of money contributed to the State agency by other public agencies and institutions, and private organizations and individuals; in-kind contributions by the State agency or third parties identifiable as being used to defray State- level administrative costs; and State agency in-kind contributions toward a local-level administrative cost. However, the prohibition against passing on the costs of the matching requirement to emergency feeding organizations remains. Therefore, only those emergency feeding organization cash or in-kind contributions which can be specifically identified as addressing State-level administrative costs may be counted toward the match. As set forth in current regulations, in order for a third-party in- kind contribution to be classified as an allowable cost for the purposes of meeting the State's matching requirement, the cost must be specifically identified as addressing State-level storage and distribution costs. For purposes of clarification, Sec. 251.9(c) of this final rule also includes the following criteria which must be met in order for a third-party in-kind contribution to qualify as a State- level storage and distribution cost for purposes of meeting the match: (1) In its administration of food assistance programs, the State has performed this type of function over a sustained period of time in the past; (2) the function was not previously performed by the State on behalf of emergency feeding organizations; and (3) the State would normally perform the function as part of its responsibility in administering TEFAP or related food assistance programs if it were not provided as an in-kind contribution. Procedures for the Distribution of Non-USDA Commodities (Sec. 251.4(i)) Section 203D(b) of the EFAA, as added by section 102 of the Hunger Prevention Act, also requires that the Secretary establish procedures for the distribution of commodities which have been donated by persons or entities other than USDA. The Department responded to this legislative provision by proposing in Sec. 251.4(i) that emergency feeding organizations be permitted to distribute such commodities either in conjunction with or separate from the distribution of USDA commodities. Two commenters stressed that this legislative requirement should be clarified. They suggested that any procedures which are developed should (1) apply only to combined distributions of USDA commodities and non-USDA commodities, and (2) neither hinder current effective practices, nor conflict with the donation-handling procedures as outlined by the Internal Revenue Service in section 170(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Department agrees that State agencies and emergency feeding organizations should have maximum flexibility in distributing these non-USDA commodities; thus, no additional regulatory requirements were imposed. Accordingly, this provision is retained in Sec. 251.4(i) of this final rule as proposed. References to 7 CFR Part 3016 (Sec. 251.9(c) and 251.10(a)(2)) The proposed rule amended Secs. 251.9(c) and 251.10(a)(2) to correct references to the Department's Uniform Federal Assistance Regulations. As stated in the proposed rule, previously all grant programs were governed by regulations at 7 CFR part 3015. However, on March 11, 1988, new regulations were published at 7 CFR part 3016 which cover all USDA grants except open-ended entitlements. The references to part 3015 in the matching and recordkeeping sections of this final rule have been changed to part 3016, and the language describing these provisions has been revised as proposed. Report of Administrative Costs--Form FNS-667 (Sec. 251.10(d)(1)) Section 251.10(d)(1) of the proposed rule was revised to require that Form FNS-667, Report of Storage and Distribution Costs (TEFAP), be used for reporting TEFAP administrative cost data. Since it has been determined that the revised Standard Form (SF) 269, Financial Status Report, is inappropriate for use in TEFAP because it does not separately identify the State- and local- level components of total program costs, comments on the proposed rule supported use of Form FNS- 667. Therefore, Sec. 251.10(d)(1) of this final rule retains the requirement that Form FNS-667 be used for reporting TEFAP cost data. As stated in the preamble to the proposed rule, FNS has obtained Office of Management and Budget approval for the use of this form in accordance with procedures established under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. As discussed above, the title of the form has been changed from ``Report of Storage and Distribution Costs (TEFAP)'' to ``Report of Administrative Costs (TEFAP).'' State Monitoring Requirement (Sec. 251.10(e)) The Department has been asked by States and emergency feeding organizations to eliminate the current requirement for annual State agency reviews of all emergency feeding organizations. The Department agrees that the reduction in the volume of available USDA commodities justifies a reduction in the monitoring burden imposed upon State agencies and emergency feeding organizations. Therefore, proposed Sec. 251.10(e)(2)(i) reduced the required State agency reviews of emergency feeding organizations by requiring an annual review of at least 25 percent of all emergency feeding organizations and a review of all such emergency feeding organizations not less frequently than once every four years. Ten commenters supported this reduction. Three commenters, however, asserted that monitoring requirements should be strengthened rather than weakened. One commenter wondered what procedure should be followed if the State agency contract requires an annual evaluation. The reduction in the monitoring burden is retained in Sec. 251.10(e)(2)(i) of this final rule. In addition to the support received from commenters, the Department is committed to reducing the administrative burden currently imposed on States while ensuring accountability. It should be emphasized, however, that the 25-percent- per-year requirement comprises the minimum monitoring requirement. If a State agency sees the need to implement more stringent monitoring standards, it is encouraged to do so. In addition to comments addressing the proposed amendment of the annual requirement for reviews of emergency feeding organizations, the Department received comments relative to the review requirements for distribution sites. Section 251.10(e)(2)(ii) of the current regulations mandates an annual review of one-third or 50, whichever is fewer, of all distribution sites within the State. The regulations further require that the reviews be conducted simultaneously with actual distribution and/or eligibility determinations. The Department has been made aware, through comments made in response to the proposed rule and consultation with State agencies, that in some instances, e.g., when distributions are conducted Statewide on the same day, it is not possible for reviews to be conducted simultaneously with actual distribution and/or eligibility determinations. Since the Department is in agreement with the concerns expressed and seeks to reduce the administrative burden currently imposed on States, Sec. 250.10(e)(2)(ii) of this final rule is revised to require that, to the maximum extent feasible, reviews be conducted simultaneously with actual distribution and/or eligibility determinations. Besides reducing the monitoring requirement, the proposed rule revised Sec. 251.10(e)(7) to require that soup kitchens and food banks which receive TEFAP funds for the storage, handling and distribution of commodities obtained under section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act be included in the TEFAP State agency's monitoring system to ensure compliance with the provisions contained in Sec. 251.8. The proposed rule permitted the delegation of this responsibility to the distributing agency which administers distributions to charitable institutions. However, under the proposed rule, the TEFAP State agency retained the ultimate responsibility for ensuring that the review requirements are met. Commenters did not object to this provision; thus it is retained in Sec. 251.10(e)(7) of this final rule. Volunteer Workers (Sec. 251.10(g)) Section 203D(c) of the EFAA, added by section 102 of the Hunger Prevention Act, requires States and emergency feeding organizations to continue to use, to the maximum extent practicable, volunteer workers, as well as commodities and other foodstuffs donated by charitable and other organizations, in the operation of TEFAP. This requirement was included in Sec. 251.10(g) of the proposed rule. This requirement is retained, as proposed, in Sec. 251.10(g) of this final rule. Food Bank Demonstration Projects Section 1773(e) of the FACT Act amended section 4 of the Commodity Distribution Reform Act and WIC Amendments of 1987, Public Law 100-237, to authorize, on a permanent basis, the distribution of USDA commodities to needy individuals and families through community food banks. Since the provisions governing the demonstration projects were never included in regulations, this legislative revision is referenced in this preamble to advise the general public that this provision is now permanent but will not be included in the Code of Federal Regulations. No additional sites will be accepted for participation as community food banks under Public Law 100-237. Deletion of Obsolete Provision As discussed in the preamble to the proposed rule, section 202A of the EFAA, which authorized the distribution of additional quantities of flour, cornmeal, and cheese, has expired. The proposed rule deleted reference to the obsolete provision in Sec. 251.4(d)(3) of the TEFAP regulations. This deletion is also made in the final rule. The reference to this provision in Sec. 251.4(h) of the proposed rule has also been deleted in this final rule. In addition to the changes described above, a few nonsubstantive revisions which simply serve to clarify the regulatory wording have been made in this final rule. List of Subjects 7 CFR Part 250 Aged, Agricultural commodities, Business and industry, Food assistance programs, Food donations, Food processing, Grant programs- social programs, Indians, Infants and children, Price support programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, School breakfast and lunch programs, Surplus agricultural commodities. 7 CFR Part 251 Aged, Agricultural commodities, Business and industry, Food assistance programs, Food donations, Grant programs-social programs, Indians, Infants and children, Price support programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, School breakfast and lunch programs, Surplus agricultural commodities. Accordingly, 7 CFR parts 250 and 251 are amended as follows: PART 250--DONATION OF FOODS FOR USE IN THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS AND AREAS UNDER ITS JURISDICTION 1. The authority citation for part 250 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 612c, 612c note, 1431, 1431b, 1431e, 1431 note, 1446a-1, 1859; 15 U.S.C. 713c; 22 U.S.C. 1922; 42 U.S.C. 1751, 1755, 1758, 1760, 1761, 1762a, 1766, 3030a, 5179, 5180. 2. Section 250.3 is amended as follows: a. The definition of Charitable institutions is amended by adding the words ``, including hospitals and facilities caring for needy infants and children,'' after the word ``institution'' in the first sentence of paragraph (c); and b. definitions of Food bank and Soup kitchen are added in alphabetical order to read as follows: Sec. 250.3 Definitions. * * * * * Food bank means a public or charitable institution that maintains an established operation involving the provision of food or edible commodities, or the products thereof, to food pantries, soup kitchens, hunger relief centers, or other food or feeding centers that provide meals or food to needy persons on a regular basis as an integral part of its normal activities. * * * * * Soup kitchen means a public or charitable institution that maintains an established feeding operation to provide food to needy homeless persons on a regular basis as an integral part of its normal activities. * * * * * 3. In Sec. 250.41, the first sentence of paragraph (a)(1) is revised to read as follows: Sec. 250.41 Charitable institutions. (a) Distribution. (1) With the exception of section 110 commodities, which are to be distributed in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 250.52, the distributing agency shall distribute donated food only to those charitable institutions which have entered into a written agreement for participation in the program with the distributing agency in accordance with Sec. 250.12(b). * * * * * * * * 4. A new Sec. 250.52 is added to read as follows: Sec. 250.52 Section 110 commodities. (a) Donations. Distributing agencies shall make commodities donated to the State under section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988 available to soup kitchens and food banks, as defined in Sec. 250.3. Such distributions shall be made on the following priority basis: (1) Soup kitchens. The distributing agency shall offer, or otherwise make available, its full allocation of commodities to soup kitchens and other like organizations that prepare meals for the homeless and to food banks for distribution to such organizations. (2) Institutions that serve only low-income recipients. If the distributing agency determines that it is not likely to exhaust its allocation of commodities under this section through distribution to institutions referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, it shall make the remaining commodities available to food banks for distribution to institutions that exclusively serve the needy. When such institutions distribute commodities to individuals for home consumption, eligibility for such commodities shall be established through a means test as determined appropriate by the distributing agency. (3) Other institutions. If a food bank determines that it is not likely to exhaust its allocation of commodities through distribution to institutions referred to in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, it may make the remaining commodities available to institutions that: (i) Document, to the satisfaction of the food bank, that they serve meals predominantly to needy persons; and (ii) Do not employ a means test to determine eligibility for such meals. (b) Tax-exempt status. Prior to making section 110 donated food available, the distributing agency shall ensure that the soup kitchen/ food bank has obtained recognition of tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code, has made application for recognition of such status and is moving toward compliance with the requirements for recognition of tax-exempt status, or is currently operating another Federal program requiring such tax-exempt status. If the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) denies a participating organization's application for recognition of tax-exempt status, the organization shall immediately notify the distributing agency of such denial, and the distributing agency shall terminate the organization's agreement and participation immediately upon receipt of such notification. If documentation of IRS recognition of tax-exempt status has not been obtained and forwarded to the distributing agency within 12 months of the effective date of the organization's approval for participation, the distributing agency shall terminate the organization's agreement and participation until such time as documentation of IRS recognition of tax-exempt status is obtained, unless the organization documents to the distributing agency's satisfaction that it has made good faith efforts to obtain recognition of its tax-exempt status and that such recognition has not been provided due to no fault of the organization. It shall be the responsibility of the soup kitchen/food bank to document that it has complied with all IRS requirements and has provided all information requested by IRS in a timely manner. (c) Agreements. The distributing agency shall distribute section 110 commodities only to those soup kitchens and food banks which have entered into an agreement for participation in the program with the distributing agency in accordance with Sec. 250.12(b). In addition to the terms and conditions set forth in Sec. 250.12(b), written agreements shall, at a minimum, include: (1) The name and location of the organization; (2) Total number of meals expected to be served or commodities provided to households for home consumption during the agreement period, to be determined as follows: (i) The total number of meals to be served in a congregate meal setting shall be determined by projecting the average number of meals to be served daily and the number of days meals will be served during the agreement period; and (ii) The number of needy households to be provided food for home consumption shall be determined by projecting the number of households to be served during the agreement period (in accordance with the method set by the distributing agency) which meet the eligibility criteria which the distributing agency has determined appropriate pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section; (3) For congregate meal service, indication of whether the organization will employ the services of a food service management company to conduct its food service operations; (4) Assurance that proper inventory controls will be maintained; (5) Assurance that all reports will be submitted as required by the distributing agency; and (6) In instances in which the donated food will be made available to an institution for household distribution, assurance that the food bank will ensure that the institution distributing the commodities will: (i) Comply with the limitation on unrelated activities established under Sec. 251.10(f) of this chapter; and (ii) Limit distribution of the donated food to those households which meet the eligibility criteria as determined appropriate by the distributing agency pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section. (d) Quantities of donated foods. (1) Donated food purchased under section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988 will be allocated to States by the Department on the basis of a formula that compares each State's population of low-income and unemployed persons to the national statistics. Each State's share of commodities, as measured by their value, shall be based 60 percent on the number of persons in households within the State having incomes below the poverty level and 40 percent on the number of unemployed persons within the State. The Department will notify each State of the types and amounts of such commodities allotted to the State under the formula when funds have been appropriated for the purchase of such commodities. The Department will make annual adjustments to the commodity allocations for each State, based on updated unemployment statistics, which will be effective for the entire fiscal year, except that such allocations shall be subject to reallocation or transfer in accordance with paragraph (d)(4) of this section and Sec. 250.13(a). (2) The distributing agency shall notify the appropriate FNSRO of the amount of the donated food it will accept no later than 30 days prior to the beginning of the shipping period. (3) The distributing agency shall accept or adjust the data reported in the agreement by soup kitchens and food banks to determine the number of meals to be served to needy persons and the number of needy households to be served in order to allocate the donated food in an equitable manner that ensures that commodities will not be made available in quantities in excess of anticipated use or the ability of the organization to accept and store the commodities. (4) In instances in which a State determines that it will not accept its full allocation, the Department will reallocate these commodities in a fair and equitable manner among those States that accept the full amount of their allocations and request additional amounts. (e) Funding. Soup kitchens and food banks receiving section 110 commodities shall be eligible to receive Emergency Food Assistance Program administrative funds for use in accordance with the provisions set forth in Sec. 251.8(d)(1)(ii) of this chapter, provided that they have entered into an agreement in accordance with Sec. 251.8(d)(2) of this chapter. (f) Maintenance of effort. Prior to making donated food available, the distributing agency shall obtain written assurance from the soup kitchen or food bank that food donations from other sources will not be diminished as a result of donated foods being made available under section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988. This assurance statement shall be maintained on file by the distributing agency. (g) Food service management companies. Institutions preparing congregate meals with section 110 commodities may employ food service management companies to conduct food service operations in accordance with Sec. 250.12(c). PART 251--THE EMERGENCY FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 1. The authority citation for Part 251 continues to read as follows: Authority: Pub. L. 98-8, as amended (7 U.S.C. 612c note). 2. The Part heading is revised as set forth above. 3. In Sec. 251.2, paragraph (c) is amended by removing the words ``storage and distribution costs'' in the first sentence and adding in their place the words ``administrative costs''. 4. In Sec. 251.3, paragraph (d) is revised to read as follows, paragraph (f) is removed, and paragraph (g) is redesignated as paragraph (f). Sec. 251.3 Definitions. * * * * * (d) Formula means the formula used by the Department to allocate among States the commodities and funding available under this part. The amount of such commodities and funds to be provided to each State will be based on each State's population of low-income and unemployed persons, as compared to national statistics. Each State's share of commodities and funds shall be based 60 percent on the number of persons in households within the State having incomes below the poverty level and 40 percent on the number of unemployed persons within the State. The surplus commodities will be allocated to States on the basis of their weight (pounds), and the commodities purchased under section 214 of the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 will be allocated on the basis of their value (dollars). In instances in which a State determines that it will not accept the full amount of its allocation of commodities purchased under section 214 of the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983, the Department will reallocate the commodities to other States on the basis of the same formula used for the initial allocation. * * * * * 5. In Sec. 251.4: a. A new paragraph (c)(3) is added; b. paragraph (d)(3) is revised, and the concluding text beginning with the word `Cheese' is removed; c. paragraphs (h), (i) and (j) are redesignated as paragraphs (j), (k) and (l), and new paragraphs (h) and (i) are added; and d. the references to ``paragraph (j)(4)'' in newly redesignated paragraph (l) are removed, and references to ``paragraph (l)(4)'' are added in their place. The revision and additions read as follows: Sec. 251.4 Availability of commodities. * * * * * (c) Allocations. * * * (3) State agencies shall notify the appropriate FNSRO of the amount of the commodities they will accept not later than 30 days prior to the beginning of the shipping period. (d) Quantities requested. * * * (3) Establish distribution rates, based on household size, to be used by emergency feeding organizations which provide commodities to needy persons in households. * * * * * (h) Distribution to emergency feeding organizations. Emergency feeding organizations shall be eligible to receive commodities which are made available under sections 202 and 214 of the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983. State agencies may give priority in the distribution of these commodities to existing food bank networks and other organizations whose ongoing primary function is to facilitate the distribution of food to low-income households, including food from sources other than the Department. (i) Distribution of non-USDA foods. Emergency feeding organizations may incorporate the distribution of foods which have been donated by charitable organizations or other entities with the distribution of USDA-donated commodities or distribute them separately. * * * * * 6. In Sec. 251.6, paragraph (a)(4) is revised to read as follows: Sec. 251.6 Distribution plan. (a) Contents of the plan. * * * (4) A description of the State's formula for allocating administrative funds among State agencies and emergency feeding organizations, including, if applicable, soup kitchens and food banks receiving administrative funds in connection with commodities which are made available under section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988 in accordance with Sec. 251.8(d)(1); and * * * * * 7. In Sec. 251.7, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows: Sec. 251.7 Formula adjustments. (a) Commodity adjustments. The Department will make adjustments to the commodity allocation formula for each State, based on updated unemployment statistics, as follows: (1) Surplus commodities. Adjustments will be made semi-annually effective on January 1 and July 1 of each fiscal year; and (2) Purchased commodities. Adjustments will be made annually and will be effective for the entire fiscal year, subject to reallocation or transfer in accordance with this part. * * * * * 8. Section 251.8 is amended by revising the section heading and paragraph (d) to read as follows: Sec. 251.8 Payment of funds for administrative costs. * * * * * (d) Use of funds--(1) Allowable administrative costs. Funds made available under this part shall be used by State agencies or emergency feeding organizations only for the following administrative costs: (i) USDA commodities. Funds may be used for the direct costs associated with the intrastate distribution of commodities donated under this part and under section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988 by emergency feeding organizations. In addition, emergency feeding organizations that also receive commodities under part 250 of this chapter may use the funds provided under this part for direct costs associated with the distribution of such commodities. These costs include the costs paid by an emergency feeding organization or paid by a State agency on behalf of an emergency feeding organization for: (A) Transporting, storing, handling, repackaging, processing, and distributing commodities incurred after they are received by the organization; (B) Costs associated with determinations of eligibility, verification, and documentation; (C) Costs of providing information to persons receiving USDA commodities concerning the appropriate storage and preparation of such commodities; (D) Costs involved in publishing announcements of times and locations of distribution; and (E) Costs of recordkeeping, auditing, and other administrative procedures required for program participation. (ii) Non-USDA commodities. Funds may also be used by emergency feeding organizations for the direct costs associated with the intrastate distribution of commodities donated by persons or entities other than USDA, provided, however, that these costs shall be limited to the costs of storing, handling and distributing such commodities. State-level costs shall be allowable only to the extent that the commodities are ultimately distributed by emergency feeding organizations which have entered into agreements with the State agency in accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of this section. (2) Agreements. (i) In order to be eligible for funds under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, emergency feeding organizations shall have entered into an agreement pursuant to Sec. 251.2(c) for the receipt of donated foods under this part or an agreement pursuant to paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section for the receipt of funds in connection with section 110 commodities. (ii) In instances in which administrative funds are made available in connection with section 110 commodities and the State agency responsible for the distribution of TEFAP commodities and funds is not also responsible for the distribution of section 110 commodities, the State agency responsible for the administration of TEFAP shall enter into an agreement with the soup kitchens/food banks (as described in Sec. 250.52(c) of this chapter) requesting the funds, or with the State agency responsible for the distribution of section 110 commodities, which will then enter into agreements with those soup kitchens and food banks. The agreement with the soup kitchen or food bank shall require compliance with the provisions of this section and Sec. 251.10(a) and (e). (3) Local support. (i) Not less than 40 percent of the Federal Emergency Food Assistance Program administrative funds allocated to the State in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be: (A) Provided by the State agency to emergency feeding organizations as either reimbursement or advance payment for administrative costs incurred by emergency feeding organizations in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this section, except that emergency feeding organizations may retain advance payments only to the extent that they actually incur such costs; or (B) Directly expended by the State agency to cover administrative costs incurred by, or on behalf of, emergency feeding organizations in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this section. (ii) State agencies shall not charge for commodities made available under this part to emergency feeding organizations. * * * * * 9. Section 251.9 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as follows: Sec. 251.9 Matching of funds. (a) State matching requirement. The State shall provide a cash or in-kind contribution equal to the amount of the Federal Emergency Food Assistance Program administrative funds received under Sec. 251.8 and retained by the State agency for State-level costs. Any portion of the Federal grant passed through for administrative costs incurred at the local level or directly expended by the State agency for such local- level costs (in accordance with Sec. 251.8(d)(3)) shall be exempt from the State match requirement. * * * * * (c) Applicable contributions. States shall meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section through cash or in-kind contributions from sources other than Federal funds which are prohibited by law from being used to meet a Federally mandated State matching requirement. Such contributions shall meet the requirements set forth in 7 CFR 3016.24. In accordance with 7 CFR 3016.24(b)(1), the matching requirement shall not be met by contributions for costs supported by another Federal grant, except as provided by Federal statute. Allowable contributions are only those contributions for costs which would otherwise be allowable as State or local-level administrative costs. (1) Cash. An allowable cash contribution is any cash outlay of the State agency for a specifically identifiable allowable State- or local- level administrative cost, including the outlay of money contributed to the State agency by other public agencies and institutions, and private organizations and individuals. Examples of cash contributions include, but are not limited to, expenditures for office supplies, storage space, transportation, loading facilities and equipment, employees' salaries, and other goods and services specifically identifiable as State- or local-level administrative costs for which there has been a cash outlay by the State agency. (2) In-kind. (i) Allowable in-kind contributions are any contributions, which are non-cash outlays, of real property and non- expendable personal property and the value of goods and services specifically identifiable with allowable State administrative costs or, when contributed by the State agency to an emergency feeding organization, allowable local-level administrative costs. Examples of in-kind contributions include, but are not limited to, the donation of office supplies, storage space, vehicles to transport the commodities, loading facilities and equipment such as pallets and forklifts, and other non-cash goods or services specifically identifiable with allowable State-level administrative costs or, when contributed by the State agency to an emergency feeding organization, allowable local- level administrative costs. In-kind contributions shall be valued in accordance with 7 CFR 3016.24(c) through 3016.24(f). (ii) In order for a third-party in-kind contribution to qualify as a State-level administrative cost for purposes of meeting the match, all of the following criteria shall be met: (A) In its administration of food assistance programs, the State has performed this type of function over a sustained period of time in the past; (B) The function was not previously performed by the State on behalf of emergency feeding organizations; and (C) The State would normally perform the function as part of its responsibility in administering TEFAP or related food assistance programs if it were not provided as an in-kind contribution. * * * * * 8. In Sec. 251.10: a. Paragraph (a)(2) is amended by removing reference to ``3015'' and adding a reference to ``3016'' in its place; b. the third sentence of paragraph (d)(1) is revised; c. paragraph (e)(2) is revised; and d. new paragraphs (e)(7), (g) and (h) are added. The revisions and additions read as follows: Sec. 251.10 Miscellaneous provisions. * * * * * (d) Reports. (1) * * * The data shall be identified on Form FNS- 667, Report of Administrative Costs (TEFAP), and shall be submitted to the appropriate FNS Regional Office on a quarterly basis. * * * * * * * * (e) State monitoring system. * * * (2) Unless specific exceptions are approved in writing by the FNS Regional Office, the State monitoring system shall include: (i) An annual review of at least 25 percent of all emergency feeding organizations and a review of all such organizations not less frequently than once every four years; and (ii) An annual review of one-third or 50, whichever is fewer, of all distribution sites within the State, to be conducted, to the maximum extent feasible, simultaneously with actual distribution and/or eligibility determinations. * * * * * (7) State agencies shall ensure that emergency feeding organizations which receive administrative funds in connection with commodities made available under section 110 of the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988 are reviewed at the frequency stipulated in paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this section to ensure compliance with the provisions contained in Sec. 251.8. * * * * * (g) Use of volunteer workers and non-USDA commodities. In the operation of the Emergency Food Assistance Program, State agencies and emergency feeding organizations shall, to the maximum extent practicable, use volunteer workers and foods which have been donated by charitable and other types of organizations. (h) Maintenance of effort. If the State uses its own funds to provide commodities or services to organizations receiving funds or services under section 214 of the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983, the State shall not diminish the level of support it provides to such organizations or reduce the amount of funds available for other nutrition programs in the State in each fiscal year. Dated: April 3, 1994. William E. Ludwig, Administrator. [FR Doc. 94-8505 Filed 4-8-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-30-U