[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 1994)] [Unknown Section] [Page 0] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-9318] [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: April 19, 1994] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-33901; File No. SR-CHX-93-28] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to Amendment No. 1 to Proposed Rule Change Relating to Corporate Governance Issues April 12, 1994. I. Introduction On October 21, 1993, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or ``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission''), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend the Exchange's Charter, Constitution, and rules relating to corporate governance issues. On March 29, 1994, the CHX submitted Amendment No. 1 to the rule filing.\3\ Specifically, the changes concern: (i) The limitation of Governor monetary liability under Delaware law, (ii) providing more flexibility in setting the dates for the annual meeting and election, (iii) providing more flexibility in the number of Governors who can serve on the Executive and Finance Committees, and (iv) granting the President full voting powers on the Executive Committee. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\15 U.S.C. Sec. 78s(b)(1) (1988). \2\17 CFR 240.19b-4 (1993). \3\Letter from J. Craig Long, Foley & Lardner, to Katherine Simmons, Attorney, SEC, dated March 28, 1994. Amendment No. 1 clarified certain language in the proposal. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change was published for comment in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33318 (December 10, 1993), 58 FR 66042 (December 17, 1993). No comments were received on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change as amended. II. Description of the Proposal Liability of Governors Delaware's General Corporation Law permits the adoption of a provision in the Certificate of Incorporation of a Delaware corporation that limits or eliminates the potential monetary liability of directors to the corporation or its shareholders by reason of their conduct as directors under certain circumstances. Such a provision does not apply to acts or omissions of directors occurring prior to the approval of the provision by shareholders and the filing of the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware. Because the CHX is a Delaware Corporation, the amendment to Article Eleventh of its Certificate of Incorporation is based on section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware Corporations Code.\4\ Section 102(b)(7) permits corporations to include in their certificates of incorporation a provision limiting or eliminating the personal liability of directors to the corporation and its shareholders for monetary damages for a breach of their fiduciary duty. The statute does not permit the limitation or elimination of director's liability under the following circumstances: (1) A breach of the director's duty of loyalty, (2) acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of the law, (3) unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock purchases or redemptions, or (4) any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal benefit.\5\ In addition, the statute does not permit the adoption of any provision that would eliminate or limit the liability of a director for any act or omission occurring prior to the date when such provision becomes effective.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\Del. Code Ann. title 8, Sec. 102(b)(7) (1993). \5\Id. \6\Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Delaware statute does not eliminate a director's fiduciary duty, but rather prevents the imposition of monetary damages in the event of a breach of that duty. Other legal remedies for breach of fiduciary duty, such as rescission and injunction, remain available under the Delaware provision. The amendment to the CHX's Certificate of Incorporation limits the liability of Governors to the fullest extent of Delaware Law. The amendment includes the exclusions from limited liability enumerated in Delaware section 207(b)(7) and adds an exclusion where liability arises directly or indirectly as a result of a violation of a federal securities laws. The amendment also eliminates Governor monetary liability for acts occurring after the amendment becomes effective to the fullest extent from time to time permitted by Delaware law, thus automatically incorporating any future statutory revisions limiting Governor liability.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\A similar amendment to the Constitution was approved by the Board, the membership and the Securities and Exchange Commission in late 1989 and early 1990. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 27625 (January 16, 1989), 55 FR 2470 (January 24, 1990). However, the requisite number of membership votes was not obtained to amend the Certificate of Incorporation under the then existing voting requirement. The CHX put the 1989 proposal to a vote of its members in 1990. At that time, the Exchange's rules requiring only a majority of the members present at a meeting to approve a change to the Constitution, while requiring a majority of the entire membership to approve changes to the Certificate of Incorporation. The Exchange was able to pass the amendment to the Constitution, but did not have sufficient votes to amend its Certificate of Incorporation. The discrepancy in the number of votes needed to amend the Constitution and the Certificate of Incorporation was removed in the Exchange's corporate restructuring which the Commission approved in 1992. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 31633 (December 22, 1992), 57 FR 62402 (December 30, 1992). The standard for amending both the CHX's Constitution and Certificate of Incorporation is now a majority of the members present at a meeting. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Annual Meeting and Election Instead of holding one annual meeting, the amendment to Article IV, section 2 of the CHX's Constitution provides for two annual meetings to be held in April: An annual election meeting and an annual report meeting. The Board will have the flexibility to annually determine on which business days in April to hold the meetings. The annual election meeting will be held to vote for Governors and the Nominating Committee. The annual report meeting will be held to provide management, the Board, and members an opportunity to discuss the previous year's results and current issues facing the Exchange. The Board could determine to have these meetings on the same day or different days in April. Composition of the Executive and Finance Committees The amendment to Article V, Section 4 of the CHX's Constitution and Article IV, Rule 2 of its Rules provides that the specified number of Governors who may serve on the Executive and Finance Committees are minimums. Currently the Executive Committee is composed of 7 Board members plus the President and Chairman of the Board as ex-officio members.\8\ The Finance Committee is composed of 5 Board members plus the two ex-officio members. The number of Committee members could be increased if the Vice Chairman and the Board so determine. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\An ex-officio member is one who is the member of a board or committee by virtue of his or her title to a certain office. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Voting Powers of the President and Chairman Article VI, Section 4 of the CHX's Constitution provides that the President is ``a member of the Board of Governors and an ex-officio member, without the right to vote, of all committees except the Nominating, Audit, and Compensation Committees.'' The rule change grants the president voting power on the Exchange's Committees of which he is an ex-officio member if so designated in the CHX's Constitution or Rules. The rule change to Article V, Section 4 of the CHS's Constitution grants the President full voting powers on the Executive Committee. In addition, the rule change adds Judiciary Committees and the Committee on Organization and Governance to the list of committees of which the president is not an ex-officio member. Article VI, Section 2 of the CHX's Constitution provides that the Chairman of the Board of Governors is ``an ex-officio member, without the right to vote except as otherwise designated in this Constitution, of all committees except the Nominating Committee.'' The rule change allows to Exchange to designate the Chairman's right to vote on committees in the Exchange's Rules as well as the Constitution. The rule change to Article IV, Rules 7 and 9 of the Exchange's Rules grants the Chairman of the Board full voting powers on the Committee on Organization and Governance and the Compensation Committee. In addition, the rule change to Article VI, Section 2 of the Constitution specifies that the Chairman is not a member of any Judiciary Committee. Miscellaneous Finally, the rule change replaces the term ``Public Governor'' with ``non-member Governor'' and provides the definition of the term in Article IV, Rule 7 of the CHX's Rules to state that ``the term non- member Governor shall mean a Governor who is unaffiliated with the Exchange or any broker or dealer in securities, as defined in Article III, Section 2 of the Exchange's Constitution.'' The rule change also adds the term ``non-member Governor'' to Article IV, Rule 8. III. Discussion The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange and with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ In particular, the Commission believes that the proposal is consistent with sections 6(b)(1), (3), and (5) of the Act.\10\ Section 6(b)(1) requires that an exchange be organized and have the capacity to carry out the purposes of the Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its members and persons associated with its members with the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the exchange. Section 6(b)(3) of the Act requires, among other things, that the rule of an exchange assures a fair representation of its members in the selection of its directors and administration of its affairs. Section 6(b)(5) requires, among other things, that the rules of an exchange be designed, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\15 U.S.C. 78f(b) (1988). \10\15 U.S.C. 78f(1), (3), and (5) (1988). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission believes that the proposed rule change to limit Governor monetary liability to the Exchange and its members is consistent with the requirements of the Act.\11\ In reaching its determination to approve this rule change, the Commission has considered the potential impact that the proposal will have on the special role and responsibilities of the Board of Governors of a registered national securities exchange under the Act.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\The Commission approved the same rule change for the CHX in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 27625 (January 16, 1989), 55 FR 2470 (January 24, 1990); the Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc. in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 27466 (November 22, 1989), 54 FR 49380 (November 30, 1989); and the Midwest Clearing Corp. in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 27446 (November 16, 1989), 54 FR 48707 (November 24, 1989). \12\The Powers and responsibilities of the CHX's Board of Governors are set out in the Exchange's Constitution. Under Article III, Section 1, the Board of Governors is authorized to manage the business of the Exchange and is vested with all powers necessary for the government of the Exchange, including the regulation of the business conduct of members and member organizations and the promotion of the welfare, objects and purposes of the Exchange. Furthermore, Section 1 provides that the Board may establish Rules governing the qualifications for membership and the requirements for remaining a member in good standing. The Board is also given the power to fill vacancies in any office, including the Board of Governors, but excluding the Nominating Committee, until the next annual meeting. The Board also has the power to interpret the Constitution and Rules of the Exchange, and any interpretation made by it remains final and conclusive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Board of Governors of a national securities exchange has a crucial role in ensuring that the exchange meets its responsibilities as a self-regulatory organization under the Act. In view of this, the CHX proposal is limited so that the exemption from monetary damages is not available where liability is based, directly or indirectly, on a violation of the federal securities laws. At the same time, the Commission recognizes that national securities exchanges, such as the CHX, are incorporated under state law and, as such, are generally entitled to take advantage of provisions under state corporation codes to the extent they are consistent with the federal securities laws. The proposed rule change adequately balances the need to retain the special responsibilities of directors of national securities exchanges with the desire of the Exchange to adopt state law provisions pertaining to its corporate structure. The rule change allows the Exchange to take advantage of section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware Corporations Code as would any other organization incorporated in Delaware, except where the imposition of monetary actions involves a violation of the federal securities laws. Accordingly, Governors of the CHX will still be subject to the full panoply of damages in actions involving violations of the federal securities laws.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\To the extent there is any concern that the imposition of monetary damages against Board members for violations of federal securities laws would deter persons from acting on CHX's Board of Governors, the Commission notes that Article X of the CHX's Constitution and Article Eleventh of the CHX's Certificate of Incorporation allows the Exchange to provide indemnification to members of its Board of Governors, within the limits permitted by Delaware law, to safeguard them from expense and liability for actions that they take in such capacity in good faith in furtherance of, or without belief that such actions are opposed to, the best interests of the CHX and is members. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission believes that the CHX's proposal to split its annual meeting and provide for an annual election meeting and an annual report meeting will allow Exchange members to better concentrate on the respective issues. The annual election meeting will be held to vote for Governors and the Nomination Committee. The annual report meeting will be held to provide management, the Board, and members an opportunity to discuss the previous year's results and current issues facing the Exchange. Because each of these meetings is of extreme importance and may involve lengthy discussions, the Commission believes holding two separate meetings is appropriate and consistent with section 6(b)(3) of the Act which requires that the rules of the exchange assures a fair representation of its members in the selection of its directors and administration of its affairs.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\The Commission notes that the proposal could allow the annual election meeting to take place prior to the annual report meeting. Before setting the meeting times, the Exchange should consider that the report meeting may provide information to members that is relevant to their election of Governors at the annual election meeting. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The CHX's Constitution provides that appointments to the Executive Committee are made by the Vice Chairman of the Board with the approval of the Board of Governors.\15\ In December 1992, the Commission approved changes to the CHX's organization and governance,\16\ including changes to the Exchange's Executive Committee. Before that rule change, the Executive Committee was comprised of six Governors and the Chairman, Vice Chairman, and President. The rule change removed the Vice Chairman from the Executive Committee and provided instead for seven Governors. In addition, the Chairman was designated as the Committee's Chairman with full voting powers. The President, however, remained an ex-officio member of the Committee without the power to vote. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\See Article V, Section 4 of the CHX's Constitution. \16\See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 31633 (December 22, 1992), 57 FR 62402 (December 30, 1992). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In approving the 1992 changes to the Exchange's Executive Committee, the Commission emphasized concerns about floor domination of the governance of the Exchange.\17\ When appointing the Executive Committee members the CHX's Constitution directs the Vice Chairman to assure the geographic diversity of the Governors appointed to that Committee.\18\ Consistent with this directive, the Executive Committee has traditionally consisted of two public Governors, two ``upstairs'' member Governors, and two floor member Governors.\19\ The Exchange represented at the time of the 1992 changes that it continued to support such diversity in the Executive Committee and expected its future composition to be consistent with past practices.\20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\Section 6(b)(3) of the Act requires that the rules of an exchange assure a fair representation of its members in the selection of its directors and administration of its affairs and provide that one or more directors represent issuers and investors and not be associated with a member of the exchange or a broker- dealer. The Executive Committee wields most of the powers of the full Board between Board meetings. As a result, floor domination of the Executive Committee (like floor domination of the Board) may violate Section 6(b)(3)'s requirement of fair representation. \18\Art. V., Sec. 4 of the CHX's Constitution. \19\The Exchange indicated that the seventh Governor member of the Executive Committee (created by the departure of the Vice Chairman) would be appointed ad hoc, depending on the strengths and weaknesses of individual Board members and the needs of the Exchange. Telephone conversation between J. Craig Long, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, MSE, and Beth Stekler, Staff Attorney, SEC, on December 18, 1992. \20\See letter from John L. Fletcher, Vice Chairman, and Homer J. Livingston, President-Designate, MSE, to Brandon C. Becker, Deputy Director, Division of Market Regulation, SEC, dated December 17, 1992. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The rule change now under consideration provides that the Executive Committee will be comprised of at least seven floor governors. This change allows the Vice Chairman, with Board approval, to expand the number of governors serving on the Executive Committee. While the Commission believes that the Exchange should be able to expand the number of Governors serving on the Committee if such expansion is necessary for the efficient administration of Exchange business, the Commission expects the Exchange to maintain the relative representation of the various geographic groups on the Committee and would be concerned if the Committee was dominated by a particular group (e.g., floor members). The CHX has represented that it will continue to support diversity in the Executive Committee. Specifically, the CHX has indicated that the Vice Chairman will appoint additional governors, should the number be increased from seven, in a manner which will continue fair representation of public Governors, ``upstairs'' member Governors, and floor member Governors as required by the CHX's Constitution.\21\ The Commission therefore believes that the proposal is consistent with section 6(b)(3) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\Telephone conversation between Craig Long, Foley & Lardner, and Katherine Simmons, Division of Market Regulation, SEC (January 26, 1994). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the reasons discussed below, the Commission also is approving changes to the Exchange's Executive Committee, Finance Committee, Committee on Organization and Governance, and Compensation Committee. The Commission notes that although there is no provision in the CHX's Constitution specifically directing geographic diversity in the Governors appointed to committees other than the Executive Committee,\22\ Section 6(b)(3) of the Act requires that the rules of an exchange assure a fair representation of its members in the administration of its affairs. The Commission believes that the fair representation provision of Section 6(b)(3) requires the Exchange to ensure that all of its committees have a diversity of governors (i.e., public Governors, ``upstairs'' member Governors, and floor member Governors). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ See Art. V., Sec. 4 of the CHX's Constitution and text accompanying note 14, supra. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminarily, the Commission believes the rule change to Article VI, Sections 2 (Chairman) and 4 (President) to provide that the Chairman and President are ex-officio members of all Executive Committees (except those specified in the provisions) without the right to vote unless ``otherwise designated in the Constitution or the Rules'' is consistent with the Act. The rule change allows the Exchange to indicate if the Chairman or President has the right to vote on a particular Committee in the Section or Rule pertaining to each Committee. The Commission believes that giving the President full voting powers on the Executive Committee is consistent with the President's voting powers on the Board. The Commission notes that the Executive Committee has full Board authority to act between Board meetings on most issues. In addition, because the Exchange's Constitution requires that the president not be a member of the Exchange or affiliated in any way with a member organization during his incumbency,\23\ granting the President voting powers does not change the presentation on the Executive Committee of any particular group. Therefore, this rule change is consistent with sections 6(b) (1) and (3) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- See article IV, Section 4 of the CHX's Constitution. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission also believes that the Exchange's proposal to allow the Vice Chairman, with Board Approval, to expand the number of Governors serving on the Finance Committee is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(1) of the Act because the rule change is designed to enhance the governance process of the Exchange. The Finance Committee reviews annual profit plans and budgets for the Exchange and its subsidiaries, reviews the financial condition of the Exchange and its subsidiaries, reviews the performance of Exchange investments, formulates investment policy, and makes recommendations to the management or Board. Because this Committee has an important function involving a wide range of financial issues, the Commission believes it is reasonable that the Exchange may decide that additional Governors are necessary for the Committee to fulfill its duties. Additionally, the Commission believes that the rule change to give the Chairman full voting rights as a member of the Compensation Committee and the Committee on Organization and Governance is consistent with Sections 6(b) (1) and (3) of the Act. The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing the compensation of the President and for coordinating with the President to determine a comprehensive corporate compensation and benefits policy.\24\ The Committee on Organization and Governance is responsible for periodically reviewing the organization and governance structure of the Exchange and its subsidiaries, and for making recommendations to the Board of Governors with respect thereto.\25\ The Chairman is appointed by the Board of Governors from among the 24 Governors, and may accordingly be an ``up-stairs'' member, a floor member, or a public governor. Granting the Chairman voting rights on the Compensation Committee and the Committee on Organization and Governance, therefore, may change the relative representation of one of these constituencies. The Commission expects that the Exchange will ensure fair representation on these Committees consistent with section 6(b)(3) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\See Article IV, Rule 7 of the CHX's Rules. \25\See Article IV, Rule 9 of the CHX's Rules. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission believes that the rule change providing that neither the Chairman nor the President are ex-officio members of any Judiciary Committee also is consistent with Sections 6(b)(1) and (5) of the Act. Article IV, Rule 5 of the Exchange's Rules states that ``the President shall appoint five disinterested members of the Exchange and/or general partners or officers of member organizations as a Judiciary Committee'' whenever a disciplinary matter is to be reviewed in accordance with the Rules. The rule change specifies that the Chairman and President are not ex-officio members of any Judiciary Committee. Finally, the Commission believes that the rule change replacing ``Public Governor'' with ``non-member Governor'' and defining the term as a ``Governor who is unaffiliated with the Exchange or any broker or dealer in securities, as defined in Article III, Section 2 of the Exchange's Constitution,'' serves to provide consistency within the CHX's Constitution and Rules, and has no substantive effect. The Commission notes, however, that ``non-member Governors'' are intended to be representatives of the public and that the term is synonymous with the Commission's use of the term ``public Governor'' in general, and in this order and the order approving the 1992 changes to the CHX's organization and governance.\26\ This interpretation is consistent with Section 6(b)(3) of the Act, which requires that the Exchange provide that one or more directors be representatives of issuers and investors and not be associated with a member of the exchange, broker, or dealer. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\See supra note 15 and accompanying text. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission finds good cause for approving Amendment No. 1 to the rule change prior to the thirtieth day after publication of notice of filing thereof. Amendment No. 1 made a non-substantive change to the proposal by including in the rules the Constitutional definition that a non-member Governor is unaffiliated with the Exchange or any broker or dealer in securities.\27\ The CHX's proposed rule change was published in the Federal Register for the full statutory period and no comments were received.\28\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\See supra note 3. \28\See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33318 (December 10, 1993), 58 FR 66042 (December 17, 1993). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning Amendment No. 1. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the CHX. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-93-28 and should be submitted by May 10, 1994. V. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\29\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CHX-93-28) is approved. \29\15 U.S.C. 78S(B)(2) (1988). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.\30\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1993). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 94-9318 Filed 4-18-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-M