[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 18, 1994)] [Unknown Section] [Page 0] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-11990] [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: May 18, 1994] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [PP 1F4029/R2059; FRL-4778-8] RIN 2070-AB78 Pesticide Tolerances for Metsulfuron Methyl AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This rule establishes increased tolerances for the combined residues of the herbicide metsulfuron methyl (methyl 2-[[[[(4-methoxy- 6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]-amino]sulfonyl]benzoate) and its metabolite methyl 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2- yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-4-hydroxybenzoate in or on the raw agricultural commodities (RACs) wheat and barley grain at 0.1 part per million (ppm) and wheat and barley straw at 0.3 ppm. This regulation was requested by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., and establishes the maximum permissible levels for residues of the herbicide in or on these raw RACs. EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation becomes effective May 18, 1994. ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the document control number, [PP 1F4029/R2059], may be submitted to: Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. A copy of any objections and hearing request filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified by the document control number and submitted to: Public Response and Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring copy of objections and hearing request to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202. Fees accompanying objections shall be labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Robert J. Taylor, Product Manager (PM) 25, Registration Division (7505C), Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-305-6800. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of March 11, 1992 (57 FR 8658), EPA issued a notice which announced that E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. had submitted pesticide petition 1F4029 to EPA proposing to establish a regulation under section 408 of the Federal Rood, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 346a, to permit residues of metsulfuron methyl (methyl [[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2yl)amino] carbonyl]amino] sulfonyl]benzoate) and its metabolite methyl 2-[[[[(4- methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-4- hydroxybenzoate in or on wheat grain at 0.1 ppm, wheat straw at 0.3 ppm, barely grain at 0.1 ppm, and barley straw at 0.3 ppm. There were no comments or requests for referral to an advisory committee received in response to the notice of filing. The data submitted in the petition and other relevant material have been evaluated. The toxicology data listed below were considered in support of these tolerances. 1. Several acute studies placing technical-grade metsulfuron methyl in Toxicity Categories III and IV. 2. A 21-day dermal study with rabbits at 125, 500, and 2,000 milligrams/kilograms/day (mg/kg) with a systemic no-observable-effect level (NOEL) of 500 mg/kg/day for systemic effects based on occurrence of diarrhea at 2,000 mg/kg, and a dermal irritation NOEL of 125 mg/kg/ day. 3. A 1-year feeding study in dogs fed dosages of 1, 1.25, 12.5, and 125 mg/kg/day with a NOEL of 1.25 mg/kg based on decreased serum lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) at 12.5 mg/kg. 4. A 2-year chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study in rats fed dosages of 0, 0.25, 1.25, 25, 125, and 250 mg/kg/day with no carcinogenic effects observed under the conditions of the study at dose levels up to and including 250 mg/kg/day (highest dose tested [HDT]) and a systemic NOEL of 25 mg/kg/day based on decreased body weight at 250 mg/kg/day. 5. An 18-month feeding/carcinogenicity study in mice fed dosages of 0, 0.75, 3.75, 75, 375, and 750 mg/kg/day with no carcinogenic effects observed under the conditions of the study at dose levels up to and including 750 mg/kg/day (HDT) and a systemic NOEL of 750 mg/kg/day (HDT). 6. A developmental toxicity study in rats fed dosage levels of 0, 40, 250, and 1,000 mg/kg/day with a developmental NOEL of 1,000 mg/kg/ day (HDT) and a maternal NOEL of 40 mg/kg/day based on an increased incidence of ``tip-toe walk'' at 250 mg/kg/day. 7. A developmental toxicity study in rabbits fed dosage levels of 0, 25, 100, 300, and 700 mg/kg/day with a developmental NOEL of 300 mg/ kg/day and a maternal NOEL of 25 mg/kg/day based on decreased body weight at 100 mg/kg/day. 8. A two-generation reproduction study in rats fed 0, 1.25, 25, and 250 mg/kg/day with no reproductive effects at 250 mg/kg/day (HDT), a maternal NOEL of 25 mg/kg/day based on decreased body weight gain at 250 mg/kg/day, and a NOEL for effects on offspring of 250 mg/kg/day (HDT). 9. Mutagenic studies included an Ames Test, a chromosome aberration/CHO study, a rat bone marrow/aberrations, and a mouse micronucleus test (all negative). The acceptable daily intake (ADI), based on a 2-year feeding study with rats (NOEL of 25.0 mg/kg/body weight day) and using a hundredfold safety factor, is calculated to be 0.25 mg/kg/day. The theoretical maximum residue contribution (TMRC) for published tolerances is 0.000824 mg/kg/day for the overall U.S. population. The current action will increase the TMRC by 0.000074 mg/kg bwt/day (0.1%) for the overall U.S. population. For the U.S. subgroup population, nonnursing infants less than 1-year old, the TMRC 0.000059 mg/kg bwt/day, which does not raise the percentage of RfD. This tolerance and previously established tolerances utilize 0.4% of the RfD for the overall U.S. population. For the U.S. subgroup population, nonnursing infants less than a year old, this tolerance and previously established tolerances utilize 1.5% of the RfD, assuming that residue levels are at the established tolerances and that 100 percent of the crop is treated. Data lacking are a mutagenic study to fulfill the other genotoxic effects requirement. The company has been notified of the deficiency and has agreed to perform the study. The pesticide is useful for the purposes for which these tolerances are sought. The nature of the residue is adequately understood for the purpose of establishing tolerances. Adequate analytical methodology, high pressure liquid chromotography, is available for enforcement purposes. The methods are listed in PAM II. There are currently no actions pending against registration of this chemical. The established tolerances for residues in meat and milk are adequate to cover secondary residues from the proposed use. Based on the information cited above, the Agency has determined that the establishment of tolerances by amending 40 CFR part 180 will protect the public health. Therefore, the tolerances are established as set forth below. Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file written objections and/or request a hearing with the Hearing Clerk, at the address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy of the objections and/ or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be submitted to the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The objections submitted must specify the provisions of the regulation deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections. 40 CFR 178.25. Each objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a statement of the factual issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the requestor's contentions on each such issue, and a summary of any evidence relied upon by the objector. 40 CFR 178.27. A request for a hearing will be granted if the Administrator determines that the material submitted shows the following: There is a genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence identified by the requestor would, if established, resolve one or more of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking into account uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and resolution of the factual issue(s) in the manner sought by the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested. 40 CFR 178.32. Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) the Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the requirements of the Executive Order. Under section 3(f), the order defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action that is likely to result in a rule (1) having an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities (also referred to as ``economically significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order. Pursuant to the terms of the Executive Order, EPA has determined that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to OMB review. Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950). Lists of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: April 29, 1994. Douglas D. Campt, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows: PART 180--[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371. 2. In Sec. 180.428(a), by amending the table therein by revising the following entries, to read as follows: Sec. 180.428 Metsulfuron methyl; tolerances for residues. (a) * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Parts per Commodity million ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Barley, grain.............................................. 0.1 ***** Barley, straw.............................................. 0.3 ***** Wheat, grain............................................... 0.1 ***** Wheat, straw............................................... 0.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * [FR Doc. 94-11990 Filed 5-17-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-F