[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 134 (Thursday, July 14, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-17057]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: July 14, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. EL94-71-000, et al.]
North Little Rock Cogeneration, L.P. and Power Systems, Ltd., et
al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings
July 7, 1994.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission.
1. North Little Rock Cogeneration, L.P. and Power Systems, Ltd.
Docket No. EL94-71-000
Take notice that on June 27, 1994, North Little Rock Cogeneration,
L.P. (NLRC) and Power Systems, Ltd. (PSL) tendered for filing a
Petition for Enforcement under section 210(h) of the Public Utility
Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 directed against the City of North
Little Rock, Arkansas. The petitioners request that the Commission
consider their petition expeditiously and consolidate it with the
complaint being filed by the petitioners concurrently in Docket No.
EL94-72-000 against Entergy Services, Inc.
Comment date: July 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
2. North Little Rock Cogeneration, L.P. and Power Systems, Ltd. v.
Entergy Services, Inc, and Arkansas Power and Light Co.
[Docket No. EL94-72-000]
Take notice that on June 28, 1994, North Little Rock Cogeneration,
L.P. (NLRC) and Power Systems, Ltd. (PSL) tendered for filing a
complaint against Entergy Services, Inc. and Arkansas Power & Light
Company (AP&L). In their complaint NRLC and PSL challenge the
lawfulness of the wholesale power rates contained in the power
agreement between AP&L and the City of North Little Rock, Arkansas,
dated March 31, 1994. The petitioners request that the Commission
consider their complaint expeditiously and consolidate it with the
Petition for Enforcement filed by the petitioners in Docket No. EL94-
71-000 against the City of North Little Rock, Arkansas.
Comment date: July 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
3. Commonwealth Electric Company v. Boston Edison Company
[Docket No. EL94-73-000]
Take notice that on June 30, 1994, Commonwealth Electric Company
(Commonwealth) tendered for filing a Petition for Investigation and
Complaint against Boston Edison Company. According to Commonwealth, the
Petition arises out of the contract between Commonwealth and Boston
Edison Company for purchase and sale of electricity from the Pilgrim
Nuclear Plant.
Comment date: July 28, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
4. Polk Power Partners, L.P.
[Docket No. QF92-54-006]
On July 1, 1994, and July 5, 1994, Polk Power Partners, L.P.,
(Applicant) tendered for filing amendments to its filing in this
docket. No determination has been made that the submittals constitute a
complete filing.
The amendments provide additional information pertaining primarily
to the ownership, and useful thermal output of the facility.
Comment date: July 29, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
5. AEP Resources International, Limited
[Docket No. EG94-73-000]
On June 28, 1994, AEP Resources International, Limited (``AEPRI'',
a corporation duly established under the laws of the Cayman Islands
with a registered office located at Caledonian Bank & Trust Limited,
Ground Floor, Caledonian House, Mary Street, P.O. Box 1043, George
Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, filed with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission an application for determination of exempt
wholesale generator status pursuant to Part 365 of the Commission's
regulations.
In its application, AEPRI states that it intends (i) to engage
directly, or indirectly through an affiliate, in the business of owning
or operating, or both owning and operating, an eligible facility as
defined under Section 32(a)(2) of the Public Utility Holding Company
Act of 1935 (``PUHCA''), consisting of two 1300 megawatt coal-fired
units to be constructed in Suizhong, Liaoning Province, in the People's
Republic of China and selling electric energy at wholesale and/or
retail, and (ii) to engage in activities that relate to the development
and potential acquisition of ownership interests in as-yet unidentified
eligible facilities and/or EWGs.
Comment date: July 22, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice. The Commission will limit its
consideration of comments to those that concern the adequacy or
accuracy of the application.
6. Michigan Cogeneration Partners Limited Partnership
Docket No. QF94-104-000
On July 1, 1994, Michigan Cogenerator Partners Limited Partnership
tendered for filing an amendment to its filing in this docket.
The amendment pertains to information relating to technical and
ownership aspects of the qualifying facility. No determination has been
made that this submittal constitutes a complete filing.
Comment date: July 27, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraphs
E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date.
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-17057 Filed 7-13-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P