[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 1994)] [Unknown Section] [Page 0] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-29354] [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: November 29, 1994] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Customs Service 19 CFR PART 175 [T.D. 94-88] Decision Following a Petition by Domestic Interested Parties Concerning the Location and Method of Country of Origin Marking for Imported Cast Iron Soil Pipes; Correction AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury. ACTION: Final interpretive rule; correction. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This document corrects two errors in the decision published on November 15, 1994, in the Federal Register (59 FR 58771) concerning the location and method of country of origin marking of cast iron soil pipes. Firstly, the document corrects the effective date of the marking requirements set forth in the document. The marking requirements set forth in the decision shall become effective as to merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption after December 23, 1994. Secondly, the document referred to the method of marking on the sample pipe as die stamping when the actual method of marking on the sample pipe was cast-in-mold. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Dinerstein, Office of Regulations and Rulings, (202) 482-7010. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 15, 1994, a document was published in the Federal Register (59 FR 58771) giving notice that Customs has made a determination pursuant to a petition filed by domestic interested parties that cast iron soil pipes like the samples submitted to Customs and that are subject to the requirements of section 304(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended are not legibly marked in a conspicuous location to indicate their country of origin by die stamping the letters covered by tar at the edge or lip of the pipe. Die stamping was not the actual method of marking on the samples. Accordingly, this correction document remedies that error by correctly describing the method of marking as cast-in-mold. This correction does not change the conclusion in the decision that the marking on the sample pipe was neither legible nor in a conspicuous location. The decision published in the Federal Register on November 15 also incorrectly set forth the effective date of the marking requirements set forth in the decision. Instead of stating that the effective date is a date 30 days after the date of publication of such notice to the petitioner in the Customs Bulletin, as required by Sec. 175.22, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 175.22), the effective date set forth in the document incorrectly was 30 days after the date of publication of the decision in the Federal Register. The decision was published in the Customs Bulletin on November 23, 1994. Accordingly, the correct effective date is December 23, 1994. The marking requirements set forth in the decision published on November 15, 1994 in the Federal Register (59 FR 58771) as T.D. 94-88 concerning cast iron soil pipe shall become effective as to merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on December 23, 1994. After that date, cast iron soil pipe like the samples submitted to Customs pursuant to the domestic interested party petition entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption and not marked to indicate their country of origin consistent with the November 15 decision and other marking requirements of the Tariff Act and Customs Regulations shall be assessed marking duties. Dated: November 21, 1994. Harold M. Singer, Chief, Regulations Branch. [FR Doc. 94-29354 Filed 11-28-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4820-02-P