[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 7, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-30069]


[[Page Unknown]]

[Federal Register: December 7, 1994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP93-147-007]

 

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Rate Filing

December 1, 1994.
    Take notice that on November 23, 1994, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 
94, Substitute Original Sheet Nos. 95A and 95B, Substitute First 
Revised Sheet Nos. 96 and 100, with a proposed effective date of 
November 1, 1994. Tennessee states that the purpose of this filing is 
to comply with the Commission's letter order dated November 15, 1994.
    Tennessee states that the Commission approved Tennessee's previous 
filing subject to a few modifications. The instant filing implements 
those modifications. Specifically, Tennessee has clearly stated at 
Sheet No. 95B that any authorized overrun transportation will be 
subject to the scheduling priorities of Section 5(e) of Article III of 
its General Terms and Conditions, which clearly states that authorized 
overrun has a priority below firm transportation. Tennessee has also 
modified the language of Sec. 3.4(b) to clarify that Tennessee will 
waive both the overrun charge and the $25.00 penalty when overruns are 
authorized. Tennessee has also added the language that had been omitted 
from Section 8.1 of the FS Rate Schedule.
    Tennessee also states that has made a few other changes in the 
instant filing to either clarify items or respond to customer requests. 
Specifically, Tennessee has replaced the term ``excess deliverability'' 
with ``conditional deliverability'' wherever it appears in the FS Rate 
Schedule and replaced the term ``customer'' with ``Shipper'' wherever 
it appeared. Tennessee has clarified that Section 3.4(e) applies to 
assignments as well as agency arrangements. Finally, Tennessee has 
clarified that the requirement that a Shipper's Maximum Storage 
Quantity be between 30 and 150 times a shipper's Maximum Daily 
Withdrawal Quantity applies exclusive of any conditional deliverability 
awarded in this docket.
    While Tennessee does not believe any waivers are necessary, 
Tennessee respectfully requests that the Commission grant any waivers 
it deems necessary for acceptance of this filing.
    Tennessee states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
of its jurisdictional customers and affected state regulatory 
commission.
    Any person desiring to protest with reference to said filing should 
file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 
211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 
385.211. All such protests should be filed on or before December 8, 
1994. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to this proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file and 
available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-30069 Filed 12-6-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M