[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 13, 1994)] [Unknown Section] [Page 0] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-30556] [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: December 13, 1994] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 42 CFR Parts 412 and 413 [BPD-802-CN] RIN 0938-AG46 Medicare Program; Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems and Fiscal Year 1995 Rates; Correction AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. ACTION: Final rule; correction. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In the September 1, 1994 issue of the Federal Register (59 FR 45330), we published a final rule with comment period revising the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for operating costs and capital-related costs to implement necessary changes arising from our continuing experience with the system. In the addendum to that final rule with comment period, we announced the prospective payment rates for Medicare hospital inpatient services for operating costs and capital-related costs applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 1994, and set forth update factors for the rate-of-increase limits for hospitals and hospital units excluded from the prospective payment systems. This notice corrects errors made in that document. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 1994. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Davis--Wage Index (410) 966-5654; Nancy Edwards--Other Issues (410) 966-4531. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the September 1, 1994 final rule with comment period (59 FR 45330), we indicated that if a hospital believes its wage index value is incorrect as a result of an intermediary or HCFA error, the hospital must notify HCFA no later than September 23, 1994. As a result of this process, we have identified several corrections to the wage data. Accordingly, the wage index values for several areas have been changed. The final rule also contained other technical and typographical errors. The revised wage index values, and other changes affecting prospective payment rates, reflect corrections that were made between publication of the FY 1995 prospective payment system final rule with comment period on September 1, 1994, and implementation of the FY 1995 prospective payment rates on October 1, 1994. Therefore, we are making the following corrections to the September 1, 1994 final rule with comment period: 1. On page 45361, the chart at the top of the page is corrected as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Number of labor Corrected number market areas of labor market Percentage change in area wage index ------------------ areas value ----------------- FY 1995 FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1994 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase more than 10 percent....... 2 13 5 13 Increase between 5 and 10 percent... 4 24 17 24 Decrease between 5 and 10 percent... 13 58 13 58 Decrease more than 10 percent....... 10 14 10 14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. On pages 45421 through 45436, the following entries in Table 3C--Hospital Case Mix Indexes for Discharges Occurring in Federal Fiscal Year 1993; Hospital Average Hourly Wage for Federal Fiscal Year 1995 Wage Index--are corrected as follows: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Corrected avg. hour Provider Case mix index Avg. hour wage wage ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 050030........................................... 01.3478 17.25 17.31 050153........................................... 01.6323 26.54 26.63 050183........................................... 01.1897 18.72 19.77 050194........................................... 01.2188 23.01 23.15 050457........................................... 01.9263 27.09 27.16 050688........................................... 01.2086 25.13 25.25 110162........................................... 00.8663 ................... 12.98 140010........................................... 01.3097 18.77 20.61 170037........................................... 01.1331 15.60 15.31 170080........................................... 01.0304 11.67 11.23 170110........................................... 00.9268 12.68 12.61 180005........................................... 01.0444 14.66 15.54 180138........................................... 01.2598 17.78 17.30 190005........................................... 01.4454 14.98 13.28 190006........................................... 01.1903 13.93 14.22 190009........................................... 01.2947 13.88 13.73 190011........................................... 01.1190 12.19 12.11 190040........................................... 01.4197 17.30 17.28 190098........................................... 01.4469 16.69 16.44 190122........................................... 01.2075 13.84 13.57 190176........................................... 01.5428 17.76 17.42 220107........................................... 01.1159 16.97 17.91 230197........................................... 01.2661 17.75 19.21 240036........................................... 01.4910 17.88 18.16 250001........................................... 01.5597 13.55 13.71 310009........................................... 01.1537 19.28 20.11 440049........................................... 01.6483 15.27 15.47 450002........................................... 01.4852 15.52 18.57 510047........................................... 01.1688 15.81 15.86 520100........................................... 01.2514 14.46 14.74 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. On pages 45437 through 45444, in Table 4A--Wage Index and Capital Geographic Adjustment Factor (GAF) for Urban Areas--the wage index value and GAF in the following entries are corrected as follows: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changed Urban area Wage index GAF wage index Changed GAF ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0220Alexandria, LA.......................................... 0.8302 0.8804 0.8284 0.8790 0600Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC.................................... 0.8638 0.9046 0.8634 0.9043 0760Baton Rouge, LA......................................... 0.8617 0.9031 0.8582 0.9006 1123*Boston-Brockton-Nashua, MA-NH.......................... 1.1733 1.1157 1.1732 1.1156 1600*Chicago, IL............................................ 1.0666 1.0451 1.0689 1.0467 1620Chico-Paradise, CA...................................... 1.0434 1.0295 1.0441 1.0300 2320El Paso, TX............................................. 0.8618 0.9032 0.9057 0.9344 2640Flint, MI............................................... 1.0252 1.0172 1.0423 1.0288 3560Jackson, MS............................................. 0.7551 0.8250 0.7569 0.8264 3620Janesville-Beloit, WI................................... 0.8541 0.8976 0.8606 0.9023 3880Lafayette, LA........................................... 0.7975 0.8565 0.7996 0.8580 4520Louisville, KY-IN....................................... 0.9485 0.9644 0.9480 0.9641 4920*Memphis, TN-AR-MS...................................... 0.8508 0.8953 0.8535 0.8972 5170Modesto, CA............................................. 1.1348 1.0905 1.1415 1.0949 5200Monroe, LA.............................................. 0.7723 0.8378 0.7707 0.8366 5560*New Orleans, LA........................................ 0.9499 0.9654 0.9311 0.9523 5640*Newark, NJ............................................. 1.1128 1.0759 1.1156 1.0778 6323Pittsfield, MA.......................................... 1.1313 1.0882 1.1413 1.0947 6980St. Cloud, MN........................................... 0.9549 0.9689 0.9680 0.9780 7360*San Francisco, CA...................................... 1.4120 1.2665 1.4122 1.2666 7400*San Jose, CA........................................... 1.4272 1.2758 1.4276 1.2761 7680Shreveport-Bossier City, LA............................. 0.9036 0.9329 0.8992 0.9298 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. On page 45444, in Table 4B--Wage Index and Capital Geographic Adjustment Factor (GAF) for Rural Areas--the wage index value and the GAF in the following entries are corrected as follows: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changed Non-urban area Wage index GAF wage index Changed GAF ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alaska...................................................... 1.2592 1.1710 1.2591 1.1709 Kansas...................................................... 0.7270 0.8039 0.7267 0.8036 Kentucky.................................................... 0.7487 0.8202 0.7498 0.8210 West Virginia............................................... 0.8120 0.8671 0.8121 0.8672 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. On pages 45444 through 45445, in Table 4C--Wage Index and Capital Geographic Adjustment Factor (GAF) for Hospitals that are Reclassified--the wage index value and the GAF in the following entries are corrected as follows: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changed Area reclassified to Wage index GAF wage index Changed GAF ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alexandria, LA.............................................. 0.8302 0.8804 0.8284 0.8790 Baton Rouge, LA............................................. 0.8617 0.9031 0.8582 0.9006 Boston-Brockton-Nashua, MA-NH............................... 1.1733 1.1157 1.1732 1.1156 Chicago, IL................................................. 1.0666 1.0451 1.0689 1.0467 Des Moines, IA.............................................. 0.8533 0.8971 0.8510 0.8954 El Paso, TX................................................. 0.8618 0.9032 0.9057 0.9344 Flint, MI................................................... 1.0252 1.0172 1.0423 1.0288 Jackson, MS................................................. 0.7551 0.8250 0.7569 0.8264 Lafayette, LA............................................... 0.7975 0.8565 0.7996 0.8580 Louisville, KY.............................................. 0.9485 0.9644 0.9480 0.9641 Memphis, TN-AR-MS........................................... 0.8386 0.8864 0.8410 0.8882 Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ............................ 1.0770 1.0521 1.0715 1.0484 Modesto, CA................................................. 1.1348 1.0905 1.1415 1.0949 Monroe, LA.................................................. 0.7723 0.8378 0.7707 0.8366 New Orleans, LA............................................. 0.9499 0.9654 0.9311 0.9523 Newark, NJ.................................................. 1.0848 1.0573 1.0870 1.0588 St. Cloud, MN............................................... 0.9549 0.9689 0.9535 0.9679 San Francisco, CA........................................... 1.4120 1.2665 1.4122 1.2666 San Jose, CA................................................ 1.4272 1.2758 1.4276 1.2761 Rural West Virginia......................................... 0.8120 0.8671 0.8121 0.8672 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. On pages 45445 through 45447, Table 4D--Average Hourly Wage for Urban Areas--the following entries are corrected as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Average average Urban area hourly hourly wage wage ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Alexandria, LA...................................... 15.1620 15.1288 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC................................ 15.7746 15.7680 Baton Rouge, LA..................................... 15.7376 15.6738 Chicago, IL......................................... 19.4782 19.5206 Chico-Paradise, CA.................................. 19.0544 19.0673 El Paso, TX......................................... 15.7386 16.5401 Flint, MI........................................... 18.8129 19.0521 Jackson, MS......................................... 13.6437 13.6854 Janesville-Beloit, WI............................... 15.5973 15.7175 Lafayette, LA....................................... 14.4264 14.4675 Lake Charles, LA.................................... 15.0433 15.0427 Louisville, KY-IN................................... 17.3214 17.3129 Memphis, TN-AR-MS................................... 15.5377 15.5871 Modesto, CA......................................... 20.7245 20.8463 Monroe, LA.......................................... 13.9777 13.9494 New Orleans, LA..................................... 17.3485 17.0048 Newark, NJ.......................................... 21.9178 21.9471 Pittsfield, MA...................................... 20.6597 20.8427 St. Cloud, MN....................................... 17.4385 17.6778 San Francisco, CA................................... 25.7496 25.7537 San Jose, CA........................................ 26.0635 26.0709 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA.......................... 24.7020 24.7441 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA......................... 16.5027 16.4215 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7. On page 45447, Table 4E--Average Hourly Wage for Rural Areas-- the following entries are corrected as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Average average Non-urban area hourly hourly wage wage ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kansas.............................................. 13.2765 13.2707 Kentucky............................................ 13.6733 13.6938 West Virginia....................................... 14.7441 14.7464 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8. On page 45497, in Table I--Impact Analysis of Changes for FY 1995 Operating Prospective Payment System--under Bed Size (Rural), the rows and corresponding figures for Pacific and Puerto Rico are moved to page 45498 under Rural by Region, and inserted under the row and corresponding figures for Mountain. 9. On page 45498, also in Table I, under Disproportionate Share Hospitals (DSH), Other Rural DSH Hosp., the rows and corresponding figures for 100-149 Beds, 150-199 Beds, and 200 or more Beds are moved to page 45497 under Bed Size (Rural), and inserted under the row and corresponding figures for 50-99 Beds. 10. On page 45518, the sentence beginning seven lines from the bottom of the first column and continuing to the second line of the second column is corrected to read as follows: ``However, measuring the actual expected price per unit of real capital, independently of any evaluation of the propriety of any actual purchase decisions, is essential to recognize that the industry has some control over the amount of capital it purchases but little or no control over the price it pays for capital.'' 11. In the outlier example that begins on page 45368, Footnote 1a on page 45370 is corrected to read as follows: ``If hospital X were a hold harmless hospital, it should use the hospital-specific ratio of new to total capital.'' 12. On page 45457, in Table 6A--New Diagnosis Codes--the following code is added: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Diagnosis code Description CC MDC DRG ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 305.1 Tobacco use disorder......................... N 23 467 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13. On page 45461, Table 6C--Invalid Diagnosis Codes--the following entry is corrected to read as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Diagnosis code Description CC MDC DRG ------------------------------------------------------------------------ V65.4 Other counseling............................. N 23 467 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, Medicare--Hospital Insurance) Dated: December 6, 1994. Michael W. Carleton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information Resources Management. [FR Doc. 94-30556 Filed 12-12-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4120-01-P