[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 4, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16979-16985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8224]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
18 CFR Part 284
[Docket No. RM95-5-000; Order No. 577]
Release of Firm Capacity on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines
Issued March 29, 1995.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
[[Page 16980]] ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is amending its
capacity release regulations to make the capacity release mechanism
operate more efficiently and reduce burden. The existing regulations
establish the provisions under which shippers can release capacity
without having to comply with the Commission's advance posting and
bidding requirements. The Commission is extending the exception from
posting and bidding to one full calendar month as well as exempting
transactions at the maximum rate from the posting and bidding
requirements. The revisions also change the provision regarding roll-
overs of exempted releases by changing the period in which shippers
cannot re-release capacity to the same shipper from 30 days to 28 days.
EFFECTIVE DATE: The final rule becomes effective May 4, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol
Street NE., Washington, D.C. 20426.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goldenberg, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, D.C.
20426, (202) 208-2294.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In addition to publishing the full text of
this document in the Federal Register, the Commission also provides all
interested persons an opportunity to inspect or copy the contents of
this document during normal business hours in Room 3104, 941 North
Capitol Street NE., Washington D.C. 20426.
The Commission Issuance Posting System (CIPS), an electronic
bulletin board service, provides access to the texts of formal
documents issued by the Commission. CIPS is available at no charge to
the user and may be accessed using a personal computer with a modem by
dialing (202) 208-1397. To access CIPS, set your communications
software to use 19200, 14400, 12000, 9600, 7200, 4800, 2400, 1200, or
300 bps, full duplex, no parity, 8 data bits, and 1 stop bit. The full
text of this document will be available on CIPS for 60 days from the
date of issuance in ASCII and WordPerfect 5.1 format. After 60 days the
document will be archived, but still accessible. The complete text on
diskette in WordPerfect format may also be purchased from the
Commission's copy contractor, La Dorn Systems Corporation, also located
in Room 3104, 941 North Capitol Street NE., Washington D.C. 20426.
Under Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission)
regulations, firm holders of pipeline capacity can release that
capacity to others. The Commission is modifying Sec. 284.243(h) of its
capacity release regulations.
The general rule under the regulations is that shippers must post
their available capacity on the pipeline's Electronic Bulletin Board
(EBB) for bidding by potential purchasers (replacement shippers). In
Sec. 284.243(h), the Commission permits an exception to the general
rule by allowing shippers to release capacity for a period of less than
one month without having to comply with the Commission's advance
posting and bidding requirements. Shippers, however, cannot roll-over
such releases and cannot re-release capacity to the same replacement
shipper under the short-term release exception until 30 days after the
first release period ends.
The Commission is revising Sec. 284.243(h) to promote a more
effective and efficient capacity release mechanism as well as reduce
administrative burdens. The Commission is revising Sec. 284.243(h)(1)
to coordinate with the industry's monthly purchasing practices by
extending to one full calendar month the exception from the advance
posting and bidding requirements. The Commission also is exempting
transactions at the maximum rate from the posting and bidding
requirements.
The Commission is revising Sec. 284.243(h)(2) to provide for a 28
(rather than a 30) day hiatus during which shippers that released
capacity at less than the maximum rate under the exception cannot re-
release that capacity to the same replacement shipper at less than the
maximum tariff rate. This change accounts for the fact that February
has only 28 days and will ensure that shippers entering into a full
month's release in January will be able to begin another full month's
release beginning March 1.
I. Reporting Requirements
The final rule affects the information required to be maintained on
pipeline EBBs. The public reporting burden for EBBs is contained in the
information requirement FERC-549(B), ``Gas Pipeline Rates: Capacity
Release Information.'' The rule will eliminate the need for the
industry to continue the current practice of using two capacity release
postings (a less-than-one month release coupled with a one-day release)
to complete a full month release transaction. Under the rule, full
month releases can be accomplished with only one such posting.
In the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR), the Commission
estimated that 1,500 paired release transactions occur per year and
that the proposed rule would reduce burden by 1,500 hours. A survey
conducted by INGAA and filed with their comments indicates there were
1,924 paired release transactions during the first three quarters of
1994. Both the staff estimate and the industry survey are based on
historical data. However, the number of capacity release transactions
has increased each quarter, as the industry has gained more experience
with capacity release. Therefore, historical data are not an accurate
indicator of the current level of capacity release activity.
The current rate of paired release transactions, when annualized,
is about 3,500 per year. At one hour per transaction, the annual
reduction in burden as a result of this rule is approximately 3,500
hours.
A copy of this final rule is being provided to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). Interested persons may send comments
regarding the burden estimates or any other aspect of this collection
of information, including suggestions for further reductions of this
burden, to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 941 North Capitol
Street NE., Washington, D.C. 20426 [Attention: Michael Miller,
Information Services Division, (202) 208-1415, FAX (202) 208-2425].
Comments on the requirements of this proposed rule may also be sent to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Washington,
D.C. 20503 [Attention: Desk Officer for Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (202) 395-6880, FAX (202) 395-5167].
II. Background
Under the current capacity release regulations, promulgated in
Order No. 636,1 holders of firm capacity on pipelines can reassign
that capacity in two ways.2 The releasing shipper can choose to
have the pipeline post the notice of release on the pipeline's EBB so
other shippers can submit bids for that capacity, with the capacity
awarded to the highest bidder. Or, the releasing shipper can enter into
a pre-arranged [[Page 16981]] deal with a replacement shipper for the
release of capacity.
\1\Pipeline Service Obligations and Revisions to Regulations
Governing Self-Implementing Transportation; and Regulation of
Natural Gas Pipelines After Partial Wellhead Decontrol, Order No.
636, 57 FR 13,267 (Apr. 16, 1992), III FERC Stats. & Regs. Preambles
30,939 (Apr. 8, 1992), order on reh'g, Order No. 636-A, 57 FR
36,128 (Aug. 12, 1992), III FERC Stats. & Regs. Preambles 30,950
(Aug. 3, 1992), order on reh'g, Order No. 636-B, 57 FR 57,911 (Dec.
8, 1992), 61 FERC 61,272 (1992), appeal re-docketed sub nom.,
United Distribution Companies, et al. v. FERC, No. 92-1485 (D.C.
Cir. Feb. 8, 1995).
\2\18 CFR 284.243(a)-(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The regulations establish different requirements for pre-arranged
releases depending on the length of the release. For pre-arranged
releases of one calendar month or more, the release must be posted on
the pipeline's EBB to permit other shippers to bid for that
capacity.\3\
\3\If a shipper bids more than the pre-arranged release rate,
the pre-arranged replacement shipper is given the opportunity to
match that bid to retain the capacity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For pre-arranged releases of less than one calendar month,
Sec. 284.243(h) permits shippers to consummate the transaction without
complying with the posting and bidding requirements.4 Releases
under this provision must be posted no later than 48 hours after the
release transaction begins. Section 284.243(h)(2) provides that
shippers cannot roll-over or extend releases covered by this exception
unless they comply with the requirements for prior notice and bidding
and cannot re-release to the same replacement shipper until thirty days
after the first release period has ended.5
\4\Releasing shippers, however, are free to post pre-arranged
deals for less than one calendar month for bidding if they choose to
do so. Section 284.243(h)(1), as originally promulgated, read: ``A
release of capacity by a firm shipper to a replacement shipper for
any period of less than one calendar month need not comply with the
notification and bidding requirements of paragraphs (c) through (e)
of this section. A release under this paragraph may not exceed the
maximum rate. Notice of a firm release under this paragraph must be
provided on the pipeline's electronic bulletin board as soon as
possible, but not later than forty-eight hours, after the release
transaction commences.''
\5\Section 284.243(h)(2), as originally promulgated, read: ``A
firm shipper may not roll-over, extend, or in any way continue a
release under this paragraph without complying with the requirements
of paragraphs (c) through (e) of this section, and may not re-
release to the same replacement shipper under this paragraph until
thirty days after the first release period has ended.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission adopted the less-than-one calendar month exception
to the posting and bidding requirements to balance two objectives of
the capacity release mechanism.6 The exception was designed to
ensure that parties could quickly and efficiently consummate short-term
deals in emergency situations, such as a power plant outage resulting
in excess capacity, without the administrative complications resulting
from the advance posting and bidding requirements. On the other hand,
the restriction to less-than-one calendar month was intended to ensure
that normal monthly transactions would have to comply with the advance
posting and bidding requirements to ensure open and non-discriminatory
access to the capacity release market. The Commission thought that the
pipelines could design capacity release procedures to efficiently
handle full calendar month transactions.
\6\See Order No. 636-A, III FERC Stats. & Regs. Preambles
30,950 at 30,553-54; Order No. 636-B, 61 FERC 61,272 at 61,994-95.
'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity release mechanism has now been in effect for over a
year and the Commission has begun the process of evaluating the
mechanism's operation. In the course of this review, the staff of the
Commission has conducted informal discussions about the operation of
the capacity release mechanism and possible changes or modifications to
improve the mechanism with all major segments of the gas industry,
including pipelines, local distribution companies, marketers,
producers, end-users, and others interested in the capacity release
market, such as companies developing third-party bulletin boards.
Based on comments made in these meetings, on January 12, 1995, the
Commission issued the NOPR in this docket which proposed to extend to
one full calendar month the period in which firm shippers can release
firm capacity without having to comply with the posting and bidding
requirements.7 Due to the broad support for the revision amongst
all the industry groups involved in the staff meetings, the Commission
proposed to make this one revision so that it could be implemented
quickly. The Commission stated, however, that further adjustments to
the capacity release mechanisms were still under consideration.
\7\Release of Firm Capacity on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines,
60 FR 3783 (Jan. 19, 1995), IV FERC Stats. & Regs. [Proposed
Regulations] 32,513 (Jan. 12, 1995).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forty-five comments on the NOPR were received, all supporting the
proposed revision.8
\8\The appendix lists all those filing comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion
The extension of the short-term exception to a full calendar month
will promote a more effective capacity release market and eliminate
administrative inefficiencies created by the less than one calendar
month regulation. As the commenters point out, the change to a full
calendar month better comports with the industry's purchasing
practices. The industry generally conducts its gas purchases on a
monthly basis, so that customers requiring capacity need to acquire a
full month's capacity. Moreover, most monthly transactions occur during
a very compressed time period known as bid week and this time pressure
requires that shippers be able to obtain released capacity quickly with
the certainty that the deal will go through as negotiated.
In addition, as the comments recognized, administrative burdens
will be reduced significantly because the amendment will make
unnecessary the previous industry practice of designing so-called ``29/
1 day'' deals to arrive at full month releases. Under this practice,
shippers release capacity under the Sec. 284.243(h) exception for 29
days (or less than one calendar month) and then post a release offer
for bidding for the remaining day of the month. This practice ensures
that the designated replacement shipper can obtain a full month's
capacity, since rarely do other shippers want to purchase capacity for
one day or the one-day prearranged deal is posted at the maximum rate.
While this procedure does permit full month releases, the practice is
administratively cumbersome, doubling the administrative burden by
requiring two EBB postings, two awards, two contracts, and two bills.
According to INGAA, during the first three quarters of 1994, 14% of all
capacity releases involved paired releases.9
\9\Northwest estimates that 80% of its transactions were paired
releases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission's original reason for restricting the short-term
exception to less-than-one calendar month deals was to limit the
exception to emergency situations, so as to maximize the open bidding
for capacity. However, the widespread use of 29/1 day deals
demonstrates that bidding for one month deals is not taking place, and
any attempt to limit or restrict the 29/1 practice in order to further
promote bidding would seem only to create further inefficiencies. The
commenters agree that, on balance, the increased speed and efficiency
made possible by the extension of the short-term exception to a full
calendar month outweighs any potential benefits from requiring bidding
for monthly transactions. The commenters also point out that the
Commission and the industry can still monitor one month deals for
adherence to the Commission's policies against undue discrimination
because all deals will be posted on the pipelines' EBBs within 48
hours.
Many commenters suggest that the Commission make changes in aspects
of the capacity release regulations beyond this rule's limited focus on
the short-term exception, such as elimination of bidding, removal of
the maximum rate cap, and posting of pipeline interruptible deals,
while others contend that such major structural [[Page 16982]] changes
should not be made.10 The Commission is committed to its review of
the capacity release mechanism and will be considering these issues,
along with others, as part of that process. The Commission will address
here only those comments directly bearing upon the short-term
exception.
\10\Most commenters support and encourage the Commission's
review of other aspects of the capacity release mechanism.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IOGA-PA contends that to ensure open and non-discriminatory access
to released capacity, the Commission should require the posting of
certain details of one month transactions on the pipelines' EBBs. IOGA-
PA specifically lists price, delivery points, receipt points, recall
status, and order of curtailment as items that should be
disclosed.11
\11\Although IOGA-PA states it supports the rule as long as
sufficient information about the deal is disclosed, it later states
that it is of the opinion that all pre-arranged deals should be
subject to bidding. Requiring bidding for all pre-arranged deals,
however, would defeat the goal of the regulation by introducing the
very delay and uncertainty into monthly transactions that the
regulation is designed to eliminate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds no need to impose additional reporting
requirements, because the information listed by IOGA-PA already must be
posted on pipeline EBBs. The Commission's EBB rulemaking in Docket No.
RM93-4-00012 requires pipelines to post price, location of
releases (receipt and delivery points or pipeline segments), and the
recall status of the release.13 Pipelines must also include in
their tariffs provisions setting forth their curtailment
priority.14
\12\Standards For Electronic Bulletin Boards Required Under Part
284 of the Commission's Regulations, Order No. 563, 59 FR 516 (Jan.
5, 1994), III FERC Stats. & Regs. Preambles 30,988 (Dec. 23, 1993),
order on reh'g, Order No. 563-A, 59 FR 23624 (May 6, 1994), III FERC
Stats. & Regs. Preambles 30,994 (May 2, 1994), reh'g denied, Order
No. 563-B, 68 FERC 61,002 (1994).
\13\This information is to be posted on the pipelines' EBB
sections dealing with capacity awards. See Standardized Data Sets
and Communication Protocols, Version 1.2, Section III Firm
Transportation and Storage Capacity Release Award Data Set, III.1,
line 25 (recall indicator), Section III.1.1, lines 7-13 (price
information), Section III.1.2, line 4 (location type indicator).
These are all mandatory fields, meaning that all pipelines must
provide the required information. This document is available at the
Commission's Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch.
\14\See 18 CFR 284.14(b) (requiring pipelines to include
curtailment provisions in their filings to comply with Order No.
636).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MichCon requests clarification that the rule will apply to 31 day
months and suggests that the regulation refer to releases of 31 days,
rather than to a calendar month. MichCon suggests that this change also
will permit releases of 31 days spanning two calendar months (i.e.,
January 15 to February 15). The term ``calendar month,'' by definition,
encompasses all months, including those of 31 days, and there is no
need to substitute the phrase 31 days to add clarity. The term
``calendar month'' also better reflects the regulation's purpose,
because it synchronizes the short-term exception with the industry's
practice of purchasing gas and capacity during bid week when shippers
need speed and certainty in their transactions. The substitution of the
phrase 31 days is not needed to effectuate mid-month releases, as
MichCon suggests. If shippers have an emergency requiring the release
of capacity in the middle of a month, they can do so under the short-
term exception for the remaining days in that month (i.e., January 15
to January 31), which will leave sufficient time to post the
transaction for bidding for the next month.
Some commenters raise questions about the anti-rollover provision
in Sec. 284.243(h)(2). Louisville contends that the Commission should
either improve the speed of the posting and bidding process, or, in the
alternative, should permit roll-overs of one month deals. Natural
similarly suggests that roll-overs of one month deals should be
permitted.
The Commission is not removing the anti-rollover provision in this
rule, because its removal could vitiate the bidding process for longer
term releases; parties could effectuate long term releases simply by
agreeing to a series of roll-overs of one month releases. The issue of
whether bidding should be required for releases of more than one month
is beyond the scope of this rule, but will be considered by the
Commission in its continuing review of the capacity release mechanism.
If the anti-rollover provision is to be retained, PGT requests that
the Commission clarify the criteria a pipeline should use to determine
if a capacity release parcel falls within the roll-over provision. The
provision now reads that a shipper ``may not re-release to the same
replacement shipper under this paragraph at less than the maximum
tariff rate during the calendar month after the month in which the
first release ends.'' Thus, any subsequent re-release to the same
replacement shipper during the next calendar month is prohibited.
ANR/CIG suggest that the Commission amend the anti-rollover
provision to permit re-release of capacity to the same shipper after
one calendar month has passed, rather than the 30 days specified in the
current regulation. ANR/CIG argue this change is consistent with the
expansion of the short-term exception, in Sec. 284.243(h)(1), to one
calendar month and is more compatible with the month to month basis on
which gas and capacity transactions take place.
The Commission will not modify the anti-rollover provision to one
calendar month, because that could be more restrictive than the current
regulation in certain circumstances. For example, under the current
regulations, shippers entering into a one-week release under the short-
term exception from January 1 to January 7 could enter into a second
release under the exception beginning February 7. If, however, shippers
had to allow a full calendar month to pass between releases, the second
release could not begin until March 1.
The Commission, however, recognizes that the 30 day hiatus in the
current regulations does not accord with monthly releases in one
situation: because February has only 28 days, shippers entering into a
full month's release ending January 31 cannot enter into a new release
until March 2. To ensure that shippers can enter into full month
releases in March, the Commission is amending Sec. 284.243(h)(2) to
permit re-releases to the same replacement shipper after 28 days.
FMA suggests that roll-overs should be permitted at the maximum
rates without complying with the posting and bidding periods. In Order
No. 636-B, the Commission clarified its policies regarding prearranged
deals at the maximum rate.15 The Commission required that
pipelines adopt procedures so that bids at the maximum rate, meeting
all the terms and conditions of the bid, would not be subject to the
bidding procedures and would be implemented promptly. As the Commission
found, when a prearranged deal is at the maximum rate, no other shipper
can make a better bid for that capacity and, therefore, subjecting that
release to the bidding requirements in the pipeline's tariff could
unnecessarily delay implementation of the release. To ensure that the
regulations reflect Commission policy, the Commission is modifying
Sec. 284.243(h)(1) to include all releases at the maximum rate,
regardless of term, as releases that need not comply with the advance
posting and bidding requirements.16
\15\Order No. 636-B, 61 FERC at 61,994.
\16\In Order No. 636-B, the Commission stated that releases at
the maximum rate must be posted immediately, rather than 48 hours
after the transaction commences. Order No. 636-B, 61 FERC at 61,994.
But there seems to be no need to continue that restriction. Posting
within 48 hours is sufficient to provide the industry and the
Commission with the ability to review and monitor transactions at
the maximum rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Columbia requests that the Commission set an effective date for
this rule that will provide sufficient time for pipelines to file
revised tariff sheets and make computer programming changes to
implement the change on their EBBs. The Commission wants to make this
rule effective as soon as possible so that the industry can achieve the
efficiencies from full month releases. The Commission concludes that
making the rule effective 30 days from publication in the Federal
Register should provide most pipelines with sufficient implementation
time. If some pipelines need more time to make tariff filings to
reflect the change, the Commission can waive the 30-day notice
requirement to allow for consistent effective dates.17 Columbia
does not explain exactly what computer programming is needed to reflect
this change. The Commission considers 30 days to be sufficient time in
general to make whatever programming changes are needed to accommodate
the minor change effected by this rule. [[Page 16983]]
\17\15 U.S.C. Sec. 717c(d); 18 CFR 154.22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Environmental Analysis
The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental Assessment
or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may have a
significant adverse effect on the human environment.18 The
Commission has categorically excluded certain actions from these
requirements as not having a significant effect on the human
environment.19 The action taken here falls within categorical
exclusions provided in the Commission's regulations.20 Therefore,
an environmental assessment is unnecessary and has not been prepared in
this rulemaking.
\18\Order No. 486, Regulations Implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. &
Regs. Preambles 1986-1990 30,783 (1987).
\19\18 CFR 380.4.
\20\See 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii), 380.4(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA)21 generally
requires a description and analysis of final rules that will have
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Since the proposed regulations do not increase the burdens on any
companies or entities, they will not have a significant impact on small
entities. Pursuant to section 605(b) of the RFA, the Commission hereby
certifies that the regulations proposed herein will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
\21\5 U.S.C. 601-612.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Information Collection Requirement
OMB regulations require approval of certain information collection
requirements imposed by agency rules.22 The information
requirements affected by this proposed rule are in FERC-549B, ``Gas
Pipeline Rates: Capacity Release Information'' (1902-0169). The
Commission is issuing the final rule, including the information
requirements, to carry out its regulatory responsibilities under the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) to promote a
more effective capacity release market as instituted by the
Commission's Order No. 636. The Commission's Office of Pipeline
Regulation uses the data to review/monitor capacity release
transactions as well as firm and interruptible capacity made available
by pipelines and to take appropriate action, where and when necessary.
The collection of information is intended to be the minimum needed for
posting on EBBs to provide information about the availability of
service on interstate pipelines.
\22\5 CFR 1320.13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission is submitting to the Office of Management and the
Budget a notification of the revision to the FERC-549B collection of
information. Interested persons may obtain information on these
reporting requirements by contacting the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 941 North Capitol street, NE; Washington, DC 20426
[Attention: Michael Miller, Information Services Division, (202) 208-
1415], FAX (202) 208-2425. Comments on the requirements of this rule
can be sent to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs;
Washington, DC 20503 [Attention: Desk Officer for Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (202) 395-6880, FAX (202) 395-5167].
VII. Effective Date
The final rule will take effect May 4, 1995.
List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 284
Continental shelf, Natural gas, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
By the Commission.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
In consideration of the foregoing, the Commission amends Part 284,
Chapter I, Title 18, Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth below.
PART 284--CERTAIN SALES AND TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS UNDER THE
NATURAL GAS POLICY ACT OF 1978 AND RELATED AUTHORITIES
1. The authority citation for Part 284 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 717-717w, 3301-3432; 42 U.S.C. 7101-7532;
43 U.S.C. 1331-1356.
2. In Sec. 284.243, paragraph (h) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 284.243 Release of firm capacity on interstate pipelines.
* * * * *
(h) (1) A release of capacity by a firm shipper to a replacement
shipper for any period of one calendar month or less, or for any term
at the maximum tariff rate applicable to the release, need not comply
with the notification and bidding requirements of paragraphs (c)
through (e) of this section. A release under this paragraph may not
exceed the maximum rate. Notice of a firm release under this paragraph
must be provided on the pipeline's electronic bulletin board as soon as
possible, but not later than forty-eight hours, after the release
transaction commences.
(2) When a release under paragraph (h)(1) of this section is at
less than the maximum tariff rate, a firm shipper may not roll-over,
extend, or in any way continue the release at less than the maximum
tariff rate without complying with the requirements of paragraphs (c)
through (e) of this section, and may not re-release to the same
replacement shipper under this paragraph at less than the maximum
tariff rate until twenty-eight days after the first release period has
ended.
Note--The following appendix will not appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations.
[[Page 16984]]
Appendix--Parties Filing Comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
[Docket No. RM95-5-000]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenter Abbreviation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Gas Association.................. AGA.
American Public Gas Association........... APGA.
ANR Pipeline Company and Colorado ANR/CIG.
Interstate Gas Company.
Associated Gas Distributors............... AGD.
Atlanta Gas Light Company and Chattanooga Atlanta/Chattanooga.
Gas Company.
Baltimore Gas and Electric Company........ Baltimore.
Brooklyn Union Gas Company................ Brooklyn Union.
City of Hamilton, Ohio.................... Hamilton.
Columbia Gas Distribution Companies....... Columbia Distribution.
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation and Columbia.
Columbia Gulf Gas Transmission Company.
Consolidated Edison Company of New York... Con Edison.
Consolidated Natural Gas Company.......... Consolidated.
Consumers Power Company................... CPCo.
EnerSoft Corporation and New York EnerSoft/NYMEX.
Mercantile Exchange.
Enron Interstate Pipelines (Northern Enron.
Natural Gas Company, Transwestern
Pipeline Company, Florida Gas
Transmission Company, and Black Marlin
Pipeline Company) and Enron Capital &
Trade Resources Corporation.
Fuel Managers Association................. FMA.
Hadson Gas Systems, Inc................... Hadson.
Illinois Power Company.................... Illinois Power.
Independent Oil and Gas Association of IOGA-PA.
Pennsylvania.
Independent Petroleum Association of IPAA.
America.
Interstate Natural Gas Association of INGAA.
America.
JMC Power Projects (Altersco-Pittsfield, JMC Power Projects.
L.P., MASSPOWER, Ocean State Power, Ocean
State Power II, and Selkirk Cogen
Partners, L.P.
K N Interstate Gas Transmission Company... KNI.
Louisville Gas and Electric Company....... Louisville.
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company......... MichCon.
MidCon Gas Services Corporation........... MidCon Gas Services.
Mississippi River Transmission Corporation MRT.
Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America... Natural.
Natural Gas Supply Association............ NGSA.
Northern Illinois Gas Company............. NI-Gas.
Northern Indiana Public Service Company... Northern Indiana.
Northwest Pipeline Corporation............ Northwest.
Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc........ Orange/Rockland.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company.......... PG&E.
Pacific Gas Transmission Company.......... PGT.
Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company and Peoples Gas/North Shore.
North Shore Gas Company.
Process Gas Consumers Group, American Iron Industrials.
and Steel Institute, and Georgia
Industrial Group.
Sacramento Municipal Utility District..... SMUD.
Sonat Marketing Company................... Sonat Marketing.
Southern California Edison Company........ Edison.
Southern California Gas Company........... SoCalGas.
Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, PEC Pipeline Group.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company,
Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, and
Trunkline Gas Company.
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation........ Texas Gas.
United Distribution Companies............. UDC.
Wisconsin Distributor Group............... WDG.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 16985]]
[FR Doc. 95-8224 Filed 4-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P