[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 203 (Friday, October 20, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 54226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-26090]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-5229-9]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared October 02, 1995 Through 
October 06, 1995 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), 
under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the 
National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of 
EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 
(202) 260-5076.
    An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 14, 1995 (60 
FR 19047).

Draft EISs

    ERP No. D-AFS-L65174-AK Rating EC2, Eight Fathom Timber Sales, 
Implementation, COE Section 404 Permit and EPA NPDES, Tongass National 
Forests, Hoonah and Sitka Ranger District, Chatham Area, AK.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding direct and 
cumulative impacts to water quality. Additional site specific 
information on bark accumulation is needed to assess impacts to the 
marine environment. EPA also requested additional discussion of best 
management practices and water quality monitoring.
    ERP No. D-FHW-E40760-NC Rating EC2, Sunset Beach Bridge No. 198 on 
Secondary Road NC-1172 Replacement, Over the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway, Funding, COE Section 10 and 404 Permit, Brunswick County, NC.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections with alternatives 
C1 and W1 due to water quality, wetlands and noise impacts. EPA prefers 
alternative C4 as it would result in the least water quality and other 
impacts.
    ERP No. D-IBR-K39053-CA Rating LO, South Bay Water Recycling 
Program (SBWRP), Development and Construction, Funding and COE Section 
404 Permit, Golden Triangle Area, City of San Jose, Santa Clara County, 
CA.
    Summary: EPA expressed a lack of environmental objections to the 
proposed action.

Final EISs

    ERP No. F-AFS-K65240-CA Barkley Fire Salvage Sale, Implementation, 
Lower Deer Creek Management Area, Lassen National Forest, Almanor 
Ranger District, Tehama County, CA.
    Summary: Review of the Final EIS was not deemed necessary. No 
formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
    ERP No. F-AFS-L65235-ID Boise River Wildfire Recovery Project, 
Implementation, North Fork Boise River and Mores Creek Drainages, Boise 
National Forest, Idaho City and Mountain Home Ranger Districts, Boise 
and Elmore Counties, ID.
    Summary: EPA provided no formal written comments. EPA had no 
objection to the preferred alternative as described in the EIS.
    ERP No. F-BOP-D81025-PA Federal Prison Camp--Scranton, 
Pennsylvania, Construction, Operation and Site Selection, Jessup 
Borough, Lackawanna County, PA.
    Summary: EPA still expressed environmental concern regarding 
alternative site analysis and cumulative impact analysis.

    Dated: October 17, 1995.
William D. Dickerson,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 95-26090 Filed 10-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U