[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 27, 1996)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 13393-13395] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 96-7436] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 7 CFR Part 920 [Docket No. FV95-920-4FR] Kiwifruit Grown in California; Relaxation of Container Marking Requirements AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This final rule relaxes the container marking requirements for kiwifruit packed under the Federal marketing order for kiwifruit grown in California. This relaxation reduces the number of kiwifruit containers required to be marked with the lot stamp number. This rule reduces handling costs and provides more flexibility in kiwifruit packing operations. EFFECTIVE DATE: April 26, 1996. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Aguayo, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; telephone (209) 487-5901, Fax # (209) 487- 5906; or Charles Rush, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2526-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, telephone (202) 720-5127, Fax # (202) 720-5698. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 920 (7 CFR Part 920), as amended, regulating the handling of kiwifruit grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this final rule in conformance with Executive Order 12866. This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. This final rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity [[Page 13394]] is filed not later than 20 days after date of the entry of the ruling. Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small entity orientation and compatibility. There are approximately 65 handlers of California kiwifruit subject to regulation under the order and approximately 500 kiwifruit producers in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000, and small agricultural producers have been defined as those having annual receipts of less than $500,000. A majority of handlers and producers of California kiwifruit may be classified as small entities. Under the terms of the marketing order, fresh market shipments of California kiwifruit are required to be inspected and are subject to grade, size, maturity, pack and container requirements. Current requirements include specifications that all containers of kiwifruit shall be plainly marked with the lot stamp number corresponding to the lot inspection conducted by an authorized inspector, except for individual consumer packages and containers that are being directly loaded into a vehicle for export shipment under the supervision of the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service. The Kiwifruit Administrative Committee (committee), the agency responsible for local administration of the marketing order, met on November 30, 1995, and recommended, by unanimous vote, to relax the container marking requirements by reducing the number of containers plainly marked with the lot stamp number from all containers to all exposed or outside containers of kiwifruit, but not less than 75 percent of the total containers on a pallet. The marketing order authorizes under Sec. 920.52(a)(3) the establishment of container marking requirements. Section 920.303(d) of the rules and regulations outlines the lot stamp number container marking requirements for fresh kiwifruit packed under the order. The committee recommended relaxing the lot stamp number marking requirement because of changes in the produce retail industry. The committee anticipates that the current order language, which requires all containers to be plainly marked with the lot stamp number, will create a problem in the near future due to industry changes in container packaging configurations and pallet sizes. This relaxation allows the industry flexibility for future pallet size and container configurations. Many products, outside the produce industry, are received by retailers on 48- by 40-inch pallets. The kiwifruit industry almost exclusively used the ``LA Lug'' container which fits on the 35- by 42- inch or 53- by 42-inch pallets until recent years. The ``LA Lug'' configuration does not create a center tier when stacked on these pallets. When kiwifruit shippers use 35- by 42-inch or 53- by 42-inch pallets, receivers must unload the pallets and restack the fruit on metric pallets, causing more damage to the fruit and more labor costs to the receiver. Because of retail buying patterns and the retail demand for operational consistency in pallet usage, the produce industry has been moving away from using the 35- by 42-inch or 53 x 42 inch pallets and has been moving towards using a standard grocery- industry metric pallet measuring 48- by 40-inches. The committee anticipates that the retail usage of the metric pallet will continue to increase because: (1) Retailer and handler trucking and transportation costs for produce stacked on metric pallets are less than for produce stacked on 35- by 42-inch and 53- by 42-inch pallets, (2) retailer labor and disposal costs are less when metric pallets are utilized, and (3) receiving areas are steadily being remodeled to handle metric pallets. In the 1995/1996 season, approximately one percent of the industry's 9.3 million trays equivalents were packed in ``shoe'' box containers. The ``shoe'' box container (12 x 20 inches) is one of two new containers which is stacked in eight columns on a 48- by 40-inches metric pallet, and is configured in a manner which leaves one side of each container exposed. The other container that fits on the metric pallet is the ``mum'' box container. The ``mum'' box container (13.3 x 16 inches) is stacked nine columns on a pallet with the center column inaccessible to lot stamp numbering after the containers are placed on the pallet during block inspection. In block inspection, the inspection occurs after the pallets have been packed, strapped, and been placed in storage. In-line inspection is performed during the packing process, prior to palletization and storage. The industry's usage of block and in-line inspection methods is fairly evenly split with approximately 50 percent of the handlers using in-line inspection and 50 percent using block inspection. The majority of block inspections are conducted in the northern part of California while in-line inspections are conducted primarily in the southern part of California. The committee's recommendation to relax the container marking requirement will not significantly lower the number of containers being inspected or bearing the lot stamp number. Of the 81 containers stacked on a metric pallet during block inspection, nine containers (the center tier--approximately 11 percent of the pallet) will not be lot stamp numbered. The center tiers of all pallets will be randomly inspected by the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service for all marketing order requirements. When the industry utilizes in-line inspection, both the ``shoe'' and ``mum'' containers are accessible to lot stamp number marking and inspection, as they are being stacked on the pallet. There is unanimous support in the industry to reduce the lot stamp number container marking requirement. Several other alternatives were suggested during the public meeting. One alternative discussed by the committee was to require all containers to continue to be lot stamp numbered. Maintaining the requirement for lot stamp numbers to be placed on all containers increases handler labor costs, slows handler operations, increases handler restrapping costs, as well as increases inspection costs. It was the consensus of the committee that such a requirement will be cost prohibitive as each block-inspected pallet will have to be manually pulled apart to enable the lot stamp number to be placed on the nine- column center tier containers. Another alternative suggested was to eliminate the block-inspection method and require all handlers to use the in-line inspection method. During in-line inspection, containers will be stamped with the lot stamp number prior to being stacked on the pallet. This will have a serious financial impact on the industry, especially among small growers and handlers, due to a large increase in inspection costs. This suggestion was unacceptable to the industry as it will be cost prohibitive and could force small growers and handlers out of business. [[Page 13395]] Another alternative examined was to establish regulations prohibiting the use of any containers that create an inaccessible center when stacked on pallets. This alternative was not acceptable as it will not allow the industry to make necessary container changes to meet changing retailer needs and will be an excessive restriction. This final rule, which relaxes the lot stamp number requirement, impacts all handlers in the same manner and was viewed by the committee as the least restrictive and best solution. Relaxing the lot stamp number requirement solves the problems caused by changes in pallet sizes and container configurations as well as spares the industry future financial hardship. It allows the industry flexibility for future pallet size and container configurations. A proposed rule concerning this relaxation was issued on January 24, 1996, and published in the Federal Register on February 1, 1996, (61 FR 3604). That rule provided a 30-day comment period which ended March 4, 1996. No comments were received. Based on the above, the Administrator of the AMS has determined that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. After consideration of all relevant matter presented, the information and recommendations submitted by the committee, and other available information, it is found that this action will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 920 Kiwifruit, Marketing agreements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR Part 920 is amended as follows: PART 920--KIWIFRUIT GROWN IN CALIFORNIA 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR Part 920 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674. 2. In Section 920.303 paragraph (d) is revised to read as follows: Sec. 920.303 Container marking regulations. * * * * * (d) All exposed or outside containers of kiwifruit, but not less than 75 percent of the total containers on a pallet, shall be plainly marked with the lot stamp number corresponding to the lot inspection conducted by an authorized inspector; except for individual consumer packages and containers that are being directly loaded into a vehicle for export shipment under the supervision of the Federal or Federal- State Inspection Service. Dated: March 20, 1996. Eric M. Forman, Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division. [FR Doc. 96-7436 Filed 3-26-96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-02-P