[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 81 (Thursday, April 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18372-18373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-9951]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Eastern Roosevelt Lake Watershed Analysis Area, Tonto National
Forest, Gila County, Arizona
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) for the Eastern Roosevelt Lake Watershed Analysis Area
(ERLWAA) to develop grazing strategies with associated range
improvements for the following grazing allotments: Armer Mountain, A
Cross, Dagger, Poison Springs and Sierra Ancha. The ERLWAA project area
is located approximately 9 miles east of Theodore Roosevelt Lake Dam,
Roosevelt, Arizona. The allotments are further identified by the
following legal description:
Armer Mountain Allotment--31,702 Acres
All or part of sections 34-36 of T 7 N, R 13 E; sections 1-3 and
8-35 of T 6 N, R 13 E; sections 24-26, 35, and 36 of T 6 N, R 12 E;
sections 1, 2, and 12 of T 5 N, R 12 E; sections 2-10, 15-18, 20-22,
28, 29, and 32-34 of T 5 N, R 13 E; and sections 3-5, 7-10, 15-18,
20-22, and 27-29 of T 4 N, R 13 E; Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian (Appendix C-1).
A Cross Allotment--35,894 Acres
All or part of sections 34-36 of T 7 N, R 13 E; sections 31 and
32 of T 7 N, R 14 E; sections 1, 2, 12, 13, 24-26, 35, and 36 of T 6
N, R 13 E; sections 5-9 and 15-21 and 28-34 of T 6 N, R 14 E;
sections 1-3, 10-15, 21-28, and 34-36 of T 5 N, R 13 E; sections 3-
8, 16-20, and 29-31 of T 5 N, R 14 E; sections 1-3, 10-15, 22-24,
26, and 27 T 4 N, R 13 E; and sections 6 and 7 of T 4 N, R 14 E;
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian (Appendix C-2).
Dagger Allotment--33,933 Acres
All or part of sections 26, 34, 35, and 36 of T 6 N, R 15 E;
sections 24-27 and 34-36 of T 5 N, R 14 E; sections 1-3, 9-16, and
19-36 of T 5 N, R 15 E; section 35 of T 5 N, R 16 E; sections 1 and
2 of T 4 N, R 14 E; sections 1-6, 8-17, 21-28, and 33-35 of T 4 N, R
15 E; sections 2, 3, 10, 11, 14, 15, 22, and 23 of T 4 N, R 16 E;
and section 2 of T 3 N, R 15 E; Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian (Appendix C-3).
Poison Springs Allotment--43,529 Acres
All or part of sections 34 and 35 of T 5 N, R 14 E; sections 5-
9, 16-21, and 28-32 of T 4 N, R 15 E; sections 1-3, 9-16, and 20-36
of T 4 N, R 14 E; sections 35 and 36 of T 4 N, R 13 E; sections 2-
11, 14-23, and 26-36 of T 3 N, R 14 E; sections 1, 2, 11-14, 23-26
,35, and 36 of T 3 N, R 13 E; sections 3-9 and 17 of T 2 N, R 14 E;
and section 1 of T 2 N, R 13 E; Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian (Appendix C-4).
Sierra Ancha Allotment--22,099 Acres
All or part of sections 15-17, 20-22, 26-29 and 32-35 of T 6 N,
R 14 E; sections 6, 7, 18, and 19 of T 5 N, R 15 E; sections 1-5, 8-
17, and 20-34 of T 5 N, R 14 E; sections 2-10, 16-21 and 29-31 of T
4 N, R 14 E; and sections 1, 12, 13, and 24-26 of T 4 N, R 13 E;
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian (Appendix C-5).
The purpose of the EIS will be to develop and evaluate a range of
alternatives for grazing strategies and associated range improvements.
The alternatives will include a no action alternative, involving no new
range improvements or changes to the current grazing strategy for each
allotment, and additional alternatives to respond to issues generated
during the scoping process.
addresses: Submit written comments to Linny Warren, Range/Watershed/
Soils Staff Officer, Tonto Basin Ranger District, HC02 Box 4800,
Roosevelt, Arizona 85545.
responsible official: The responsible official who will make the
decision regarding this project is Dennis P. Roy, District Ranger,
Tonto Basin Ranger District, HC02 Box 4800, Roosevelt, Arizona 85545,
(520) 467-3200. He will decide under what circumstances the grazing
operation will continue.
for further information contact: Direct question about the proposed
action, public scoping, and the environmental impact statement to Linny
Warren (520) 467-3200.
supplementary information: The Eastern Roosevelt Lake Watershed
Analysis Area (ERLWAA) encompasses over 167,150 acres and contains five
grazing allotments, which are: Armer Mountain, A Cross, Dagger, Poison
Spring, and Sierra Ancha. The Forest Service's proposed management will
employ 4 grazing systems for 3 cow/calf and yearling operations. Each
grazing system will employ a rest-rotation scheme of use. Growing
season rest requirements of the plants will dictate how each pasture
will be utilized in the rotation scheme of use.
There are three designated Wilderness Areas wholly or partially
within the ERLWAA. These are the Salome
[[Page 18373]]
Wilderness (7,852 acres), the Sierra Ancha Wilderness (20,850 acres)
and the Salt River Canyon Wilderness (9,777 acres). The Sierra Ancha
Experimental Forest is 13,371 acres in size. It occurs on the A Cross
and Sierra Ancha allotments. Currently, the Tonto National Forest's
Land Management Plan has listed livestock use in the Experimental
Forest as Level A; No Grazing. On June 29, 1994, a wildfire was started
by a lightning strike near Armer Mountain. This fire burned portions of
the Armer Mountain and A Cross allotments. A total of 5,760 acres was
burned. Depending on the recovery of the vegetation on each of the
allotments, some priorities may need to be shifted in the future. The
Fish and Wildlife Service's Amendment to the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act Report on Plan 6, Central Arizona, Regulatory Storage
Division was prepared as a mitigation plan designed to mitigate impacts
on fish and wildlife resources associated with construction and
operation of Plan 6. In this report it states, ``In order to control
access to the lake by livestock and reduce impacts to native vegetation
associated with uncontrolled grazing, funding should be provided to
accelerate the implementation of new and revised Allotment Management
Plans for 11 allotments around Roosevelt Lake. * * * This funding
should be utilized for the construction of range management fencing and
water development which should provide for management designed to meet
vegetative objectives and provide appropriate use by livestock so that
established objectives could be met.'' The Armer Mountain, A Cross,
Poison Springs, and Sierra Ancha Allotments were listed as part of
those 11 allotments. An environmental assessment was prepared in
December, 1995 for the Eastern Roosevelt Lake Watershed Analysis Area.
Based on that assessment, it was determined that additional analyses
for this project were required, and that an environmental impact
statement would be prepared.
The draft EIS is expected to be filed with the EPA and to be
available for public review by July, 1996. At that time, copies of the
draft EIS will be distributed to interested and affected agencies,
organizations, and members of the public for review and comment. The
EPA will publish a Notice of Availability of the draft EIS in the
Federal Register. The comment period on the EIS will be 45 days from
the date the EPA publishes the Notice of Availability. It is very
important that those interested in this proposed action participate at
that time. To be most helpful, comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible and may address the adequacy of the statement or
the merits of the alternatives discussed (see The Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3).
In addition, Federal court decisions have established that
reviewers of a draft EIS must structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and
alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. versus NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978).
Environmental objections that could have been raised at the draft stage
may be waived it not raised until after completion of the final EIS.
City of Angoon versus Hodel, (9th Circuit, 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. versus Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis.
1980). The reason for this is to ensure that substantive comments and
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it
can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
The final EIS is scheduled to be completed by October, 1996. In the
final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to comments
received during the comment period. The responsible official will
consider the comments, responses, environmental consequences disclosed
in the final EIS, and applicable laws, regulations, and policies in
making a decision regarding this proposal. He will document the
decision and reasons for the decision in the Record of Decision. The
Record of Decision will be prepared and filed with the final EIS. That
decision will be subject to Forest Service appeal regulations (36 CFR
217).
Dated: April 12, 1996.
Robert Dunblazier,
Group Leader for Social Resources.
[FR Doc. 96-9951 Filed 4-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M