[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 122 (Monday, June 24, 1996)] [Notices] [Pages 32426-32427] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 96-15920] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-008] Color Television Receivers From the Republic of Korea: Initiation of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Consideration of Revocation of Order (in Part) AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of initiation of changed circumstances antidumping duty administrative review and consideration of revocation of order (in Part). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In response to a request made on July 20, 1995, by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Samsung), the Department of Commerce (the Department) is initiating a changed circumstances antidumping duty administrative review to consider Samsung's request to revoke the antidumping duty order on color television receivers (CTVs) from Korea (49 FR 18336, April 30, 1984) as it relates to Samsung. EFFECTIVE DATE: June 24, 1996. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Genovese or Joseph Hanley, Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone (202) 482- 4697/3058. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 20, 1995, Samsung requested that the Department conduct a changed circumstances review and revoke the order as to Samsung after completion of the review. Zenith Electronics Corporation, a domestic interested party, and petitioners filed objections to Samsung's request on August 4, 1995, and August 11, 1995, respectively. The Applicable Statute Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are to the current regulations, as amended by the interim regulations published in the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130). Scope of Review Imports covered by the antidumping duty order include CTVs, complete and incomplete, from the Republic of Korea. This merchandise is currently classifiable under item numbers 8528.10.80, 8529.90.15, 8529.90.20, and 8540.11.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). Since the order covers all CTVs regardless of HTS classification, the HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and for U.S. Customs Service purposes. Our written description of the scope of the order remains dispositive. [[Page 32427]] Initiation of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Pursuant to section 751(d) of the Act, the Department may partially revoke an antidumping duty order based on a review under section 751(b) of the Act (i.e., a changed circumstances review). Section 751(b)(1) of the Act requires the Department to conduct a changed circumstances administrative review upon receipt of a request containing information concerning changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review. The Department's regulations at 19 C.F.R. 353.25(d) permit the Department to conduct a changed circumstances administrative review under 19 C.F.R. 353.22(f) provided that the Department concludes from the available information, including information in a request for a changed circumstances review, that changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review exists. In its July 20, 1995 request for a changed circumstances review and partial revocation of the antidumping duty order, Samsung noted: 1) the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States, 6 F.3d 1511 (Fed. Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2672 (1994), which Samsung claims made it possible for the first time for it to contemplate the possibility of de minimis margins for three or more consecutive review periods; 2) that as a direct result of that decision, Samsung has now established that it has not been dumping CTVs in the United States for six consecutive years; and 3) that it has not shipped CTVs to the U.S. since 1991. We have determined that the unique circumstances presented by Samsung in this proceeding constitute changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review under section 751(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 353.22(f) of the Department's regulations. Specifically, the statute, the Department's regulations and our international obligations anticipate that a methodology exist whereby parties that have demonstrated a history of not selling at less than normal value and have established that it is not likely that they will, in the future, sell at less than normal value may obtain a partial revocation of the order. Normally, the methodology established by section 353.25 (a) and (b) is adequate to accomplish that purpose; however, the combination of the timing of certain court decisions, the timing of certain results of administrative review in this proceeding, and the coincidence of these events with the company's decision to stop shipping from Korea may have prevented the regulation from operating as intended with respect to Samsung. Therefore, in accordance with section 751(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 353.22(f) of the Department's regulations, we are initiating this changed circumstances administrative review in order to determine whether a partial revocation of the order would be appropriate as to Samsung. On January 19, 1996, we initiated an anti-circumvention inquiry to determine whether Samsung is circumventing the antidumping duty order by completing or assembling CTVs in Mexico and Thailand for exportation to the United States. We will be conducting this changed circumstances review concurrently with the anti-circumvention inquiry, and we will consider the relevance of our findings in the anti-circumvention inquiry to this changed circumstances review. This notice is in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Act and sections 353.22(f) and 353.25(d) of the Department's regulations. Dated: June 11, 1996. Robert S. LaRussa, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 96-15920 Filed 6-21-96; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P