[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 1998)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 15718-15738] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 98-8480] [[Page 15717]] _______________________________________________________________________ Part VIII Department of Health and Human Services _______________________________________________________________________ Health Care Financing Administration _______________________________________________________________________ 42 CFR Part 413 Medicare Program; Schedule of Per-Beneficiary Limitations on Home Health Agency Costs for Cost Reporting Periods; Final Rule Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 61 / Tuesday, March 31, 1998 / Rules and Regulations [[Page 15718]] DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Health Care Financing Administration 42 CFR Part 413 [HCFA-1905-FC] RIN 0938-AI84 Medicare Program; Schedule of Per-Beneficiary Limitations on Home Health Agency Costs for Cost Reporting Periods Beginning on or After October 1, 1997 AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. ACTION: Final rule with comment period. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This final rule with comment period sets forth, in accordance with section 4602 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, a new schedule of limitations on home health agency costs that may be paid under the Medicare program for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997. These limitations are in addition to the per-visit limitations that were set forth in our January 2, 1998 notice with comment period. DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective October 1, 1997. Applicability Date: The schedule of per-beneficiary limitations is applicable for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997. Comment Date: Written comments will be considered if we receive them at the appropriate address, as provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on June 1, 1998. ADDRESSES: Mail written comments (one original and three copies) to the following address: Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: HCFA-1905-FC, P.O. Box 7517, Baltimore, Maryland 21207-0517. If you prefer, you may deliver your written comments (one original and three copies) to one of the following addresses: Room 309-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20201, or Room C5-09-26, Central Building, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 Comments may also be submitted electronically to the following E- mail address: [email protected]. E-mail comments must include the full name and address of the sender and must be submitted to the referenced address in order to be considered. All comments must be incorporated in the E-mail message because we may not be able to access attachments. Because of staffing and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by facsimile (FAX) transmission. In commenting, please refer to file code HCFA-1905-FC. Comments received timely will be available for public inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3 weeks after publication of a document, in Room 309-G of the Department's offices at 200 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., on Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Phone: (202) 690-7890). Copies: To order copies of the Federal Register containing this document, send your request to: New Orders, Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. Specify the date of the issue requested and enclose a check or money order payable to the Superintendent of Documents, or enclose your VISA or MasterCard number and expiration date. Credit card orders can also be placed by calling the order desk at (202) 512-1800 or by faxing to (202) 512- 2250. The cost for each copy is $8.00. As an alternative, you may view and photocopy the Federal Register document at most libraries designated as Federal Deposit Libraries and at many other public and academic libraries throughout the country that receive the Federal Register. This Federal Register document is also available from the Federal Register online database through GPO Access, a service of the U. S. Government Printing Office. Free public access is available on a Wide Area Information Server (WAIS) through the Internet and via asynchronous dial-in. Internet users can access the database by using the World Wide Web; the Superintendent of Documents home page address is http://www.access.gpo.gov/su__ docs/, by using local WAIS client software, or by telnet to swais.access.gpo.gov, then log in as guest (no password required). Dial-in users would use communications software and modem to call (202) 512-1661; type swais, then log in as guest (no password required). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Bussacca, (410) 786-4602. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background A. Program History Section 1861(v)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act (the Act) authorizes the Secretary to establish limitations on allowable costs incurred by a provider of services that may be paid under the Medicare program, based on estimates of the costs necessary for the efficient delivery of needed health services. Under this authority, we have maintained limitations on home health agency (HHA) per-visit costs since 1979. Additional statutory provisions specifically governing the limitations applicable to HHAs are contained at section 1861(v)(1)(L) of the Act. These limits will be replaced by the establishment of a prospective payment system for home health services. However, section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v) of the Act, as added by section 4602(c) of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA '97), Pub. L. 105-33, requires the Secretary to establish an interim system of payment limitations prior to implementation of the prospective payment system. Payments by Medicare under this interim system of payment limitations must be the lower of an HHA's actual reasonable allowable costs, per-visit limitations in the aggregate, or a per-beneficiary limitation in the aggregate as described in sections 1861(v)(1)(L)(v)(I) and (v)(1)(L)(vi)(I) of the Act. Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v)(I) requires the per-beneficiary annual limitation be a blend of: (1), an agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation based on 75 percent of 98 percent of the reasonable costs (including nonroutine medical supplies) for the agency's 12-month cost reporting period ending during Federal fiscal year (FY) 1994, and (2), a census region division per-beneficiary limitation based on 25 percent of 98 percent of the regional average of such costs for the agency's census division for cost reporting periods ending during FY 1994, standardized by the hospital wage index. The reasonable costs used in the per-beneficiary limitation calculations in 1 and 2 above will be updated by the home health market basket excluding any changes in the home health market basket with respect to cost reporting periods that began on or after July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996. This per- beneficiary limitation based on the blend of the agency-specific and census region division per-beneficiary limitations will then be multiplied by the agency's unduplicated census count of beneficiaries (entitled to benefits under Medicare) to calculate the HHA's aggregate per-beneficiary limitation for the cost reporting period subject to the limitation. For new providers and providers without a 12-month cost reporting period ending in Federal fiscal year 1994, the per-beneficiary limitation will be equal to the median of these limitations applied to other HHAs as determined under section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v) of the Act. [[Page 15719]] B. Relevant Provisions of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 The BBA '97 made several changes that affect the amount of costs to be paid under Medicare for services provided by HHAs. The provisions of BBA '97 that we are implementing in this final rule with comment period are as follows. 1. Additions to Cost Limitations Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v) was added to the Act by section 4602(c) of BBA `97 and requires the establishment of an interim system of limitations for services furnished by home health agencies. Payment will not exceed the lesser of reasonable costs or the aggregate effect of the per-visit limitations published on January 2, 1998 (63 FR 89) or if lower, the aggregate per-beneficiary limitation as described in this final rule with comment. A per-beneficiary limitation for agencies with a 12-month cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994 is determined as follows: (1), an agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation based on 75 percent of 98 percent of the reasonable costs (including nonroutine medical supplies) for the agency's 12-month cost reporting period ending during Federal fiscal year (FY) 1994, and (2), a census region division per-beneficiary limitation based on 25 percent of 98 percent of the regional average of such costs for the agency's census division for cost reporting periods ending during FY 1994, standardized by the hospital wage index. The reasonable costs used in the per-beneficiary limitation calculations in 1 and 2 above will be updated by the home health market basket excluding any changes in the home health market basket with respect to cost reporting periods that began on or after July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996. This per-beneficiary limitation based on the blend of the agency-specific and census region division per-beneficiary limitations will then be multiplied by the agency's unduplicated census count of beneficiaries (entitled to benefits under Medicare) to calculate the HHA's aggregate per-beneficiary limitation for the cost reporting period subject to the limitation. How these per-beneficiary limitations are determined is explained further in section V of this document. 2. New Providers and Providers Without a 12-Month Cost Reporting Period Ending in FY 1994 Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(vi) was added to the Act by section 4602(c) of BBA '97 and requires the per-beneficiary limitation for new providers and those providers without a 12-month cost reporting period ending in FY 1994 be equal to the median of the section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v) per-beneficiary limitations applied to other HHAs. Also, an HHA that had a 12-month cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994 and had altered its corporate structure or name will not be considered a new provider for purposes of determining the per-beneficiary limitation. Examples of an HHA that has altered its corporate structure but has kept its operational structure as a freestanding or provider-based HHA would be an agency that has gone from being a non-profit entity to a profit entity or an agency that has gone from being a subchapter S corporation to a proprietary individual. The most common occurrence of an agency changing its name would be a change in ownership whereby the new owners change the name of the agency but continue operating as a freestanding or provider-based HHA. The per-beneficiary limitation that applies to these types of changes will be determined under section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v). 3. Reduction in Market Basket Updates Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(iv) was added to the Act by section 4601(a) of BBA '97 and requires the Secretary not to take into account any changes in the home health market basket with respect to cost reporting periods which began on or after July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996 in establishing the section 1861(v)(1)(L) limitations for cost reporting periods beginning after September 30, 1997. This, in effect, reduces the factors for increasing the costs in the data base used in calculating the per-beneficiary limitations. These factors are set forth in section IV. of this document. 4. Application of the Wage Index Based on Site of Service Rendered Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(iii) was amended by section 4604(b) of BBA '97 to require that the utilization of the area wage index applicable under section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Act be determined using the survey of the most recent available wages and wage-related costs of hospitals located in the geographic area in which the home health services are furnished. In effect, the regional component of the per-beneficiary limitation that will apply for the beneficiary receiving services from the HHA will be the appropriate census region per-beneficiary limitation and adjusted by the appropriate wage index for the geographic area where the beneficiary received home health services. A Program Memorandum (Rev. AB-97-18), published in September 1997, outlined the billing changes that are needed to properly implement this provision. 5. Effective Date Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(vii) of the Act was added by section 4602(c) of BBA '97. Beginning in FY 1998, the Secretary is required to establish the per-beneficiary limitations by August 1 of each year. However, for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997, the Secretary need only establish those limitations by April 1, 1998. In accordance with section 1861(v)(1)(L)(vii)(I), we are establishing by April 1, 1998, the per-beneficiary limitations for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997. II. Per-Beneficiary Limitations The cost report data used to develop the schedule of per- beneficiary limitations set forth in this final rule are for cost reporting periods ending in Federal FY 1994, as required by section 4602(c) of BBA '97. We have updated the per-beneficiary limitations to reflect the expected cost increases occurring between the cost reporting periods for the data contained in the database and September 30, 1998 (excluding, as required by statute, any changes in the home health market basket for cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996). The interim payment sets limitations according to two different methodologies. For agencies with cost reporting periods ending during Federal FY 1994, the limitation is based on 75 percent of 98 percent of the agencies' own reasonable costs and 25 percent of 98 percent of the average census region division costs. At the end of the agency's cost reporting period subject to the per-beneficiary limitations, the labor component of the census region division per-beneficiary limitation is adjusted by a wage index based on where the home health services are rendered. For new providers and providers without a cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994, the per-beneficiary limitation is based on the standardized national median of the blended agency-specific and census region division per-beneficiary limitations described above. This is done by simply arraying the agencies' per-beneficiary limitations and selecting the median case. This national per- beneficiary limitation is then standardized for the effect of the wage index. The wage index is applied to the [[Page 15720]] labor component of the national per-beneficiary limitation at the end of the cost reporting period beginning on or after October 1, 1997, and is based on where the home health services are rendered. The detailed methodologies for calculating the per-beneficiary limitations and how they are applied to agencies' costs for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997 are described below. A. Agency-Specific Rates Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v)(I) of the Act requires that 75 percent of the per-beneficiary limitation be based on 98 percent of the reasonable costs for the agency's 12-month cost reporting period that ended during FY 1994. Reasonable costs are the lesser of the actual Medicare costs of the discipline services or the aggregate discipline limitation, plus nonroutine medical supplies. This amount is multiplied by 98 percent and divided by the HHA's Federal FY 1994 unduplicated census count of beneficiaries to calculate the agency-specific per-beneficiary amount. An intricate and important part of the agency-specific per-beneficiary computation is the use of the Federal FY 1994 unduplicated census count of beneficiaries. After BBA '97 was enacted, many HHAs and their trade association representatives asserted that the unduplicated census counts of beneficiaries, as reported on the Federal FY 1994 Medicare cost report, was frequently an incorrect figure. Even though this number was a statistic required to be reported to Medicare, it was apparently not carefully monitored by HHAs because it did not impact Medicare payments at that time. Through an analysis of our database to be used in establishing the regional per-beneficiary limitations, which includes the same cost reporting period used in establishing the agency-specific per- beneficiary limitation, we confirmed that the unduplicated census count was not reliable. Based upon this determination, we generated a more accurate unduplicated census count from HCFA's Standard Analytical File (SAF), which is generated from our National Claims History File. The unduplicated census count was created from the SAF by matching all claims to each agency's cost reporting period ending in Federal FY 1994 and identifying individual beneficiaries represented in the claims. Each beneficiary was counted only once for all the claim(s) identified for that cost reporting period for each agency. A list of HHAs and associated unduplicated census counts from the SAF has been disseminated to the intermediaries for calculating the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitations. If the intermediary has an HHA that has a 12-month cost reporting period that ended in Federal FY 1994 and that agency was not on the list for an unduplicated census count from SAF, the intermediary must contact HCFA so that an unduplicated census count can be generated from SAF. B. Regional Rates by Census Division Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v)(I) of the Act requires that 25 percent of the per-beneficiary limitation be based on 98 percent of the standardized regional average of reasonable costs for the agency's census division for cost reporting periods ending during Federal FY 1994. To develop the schedule of per-beneficiary limitations by census region, we extracted the totals of the Medicare allowable costs, the aggregate cost per-visit limitation, and the Medicare nonroutine medical supply costs from settled Medicare cost reports of all HHAs for cost reporting periods ending in Federal FY 1994. How this data was used in calculating the regional rates by census division is explained further in section V.B.. Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v)(I) requires that the costs used in calculating the per-beneficiary limitations be updated using the home health market basket index. However, section 1861(v)(1)(L)(iv) prohibits the Secretary from taking into account any changes in the home health market basket with respect to cost reporting periods which began on or after July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996. Therefore, we adjusted the database used in calculating the regional per-beneficiary limitations by the market basket index excluding any changes in the home health market basket with respect to cost reporting periods which began on or after July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996. C. Wage Index A wage index is used to adjust the labor-related portion of the standardized regional average per-beneficiary limitation to reflect differing wage levels among areas. In establishing the regional average per-beneficiary limitation, we used the FY 1998 hospital wage index, which is based on 1994 hospital wage data. Each HHA's labor market area is determined based on the definitions of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(iii) of the Act requires us to use the current hospital wage index (that is, the FY 1998 hospital wage index, which was published in the Federal Register on August 29, 1997 (62 FR 46070)) without regard to whether such hospitals have been reclassified to a new geographic area, to establish the HHA cost limitations. Therefore, the schedule of standardized regional average per-beneficiary limitations reflects the MSA definitions that are currently in effect under the hospital prospective payment system. We are continuing to incorporate exceptions to the MSA classification system for certain New England counties that were identified in the July 1, 1992 notice (57 FR 29410). These exceptions have been recognized in setting hospital cost limitations for cost reporting periods beginning on and after July 1, 1979 (45 FR 41218), and were authorized under section 601(g) of the Social Security Amendments of 1983 (Public Law 98-11). Section 601(g) of Public Law 98- 21 requires that any hospital in New England that was classified as being in an urban area under the classification system in effect in 1979 will be considered urban for purposes of the hospital prospective payment system. This provision is intended to ensure equitable treatment under the hospital prospective payment system. Under this authority, the following counties have been deemed to be urban areas for purposes of payment under the inpatient hospital prospective system:Litchfield County, CT in the Hartford, CT MSA. York County, ME and Sagadahoc County, ME in the Portland, ME MSA. Merrimack County, NH in the Boston-Brockton-Nashua, MA-NH MSA Newport County, RI in the Providence Fall-Warwick, RI MSA We are continuing to grant these urban exceptions for the purpose of applying the Medicare hospital wage index to the HHA standardized regional average per-beneficiary limitations. These exceptions result in the same New England County Metropolitan Area definitions for hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and HHAs. In New England, MSAs are defined on town boundaries rather than on county lines but exclude parts of the four counties cited above that would be considered urban under the MSA definition. Under this notice, these four counties are urban under either definition, New England County Metropolitan Area or MSA. Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(iii), amended by section 4604(b) of BBA '97, requires the use of the area wage index applicable under section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Act and determined using the survey of the most recent available wages and wage-related costs of hospitals located in the [[Page 15721]] geographic area in which the home health service is furnished without regard to whether such hospitals have been reclassified to a new geographic area pursuant to section 1886(d)(8)(B) of the Act. Effective with cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997, the wage-index, as applied to the labor portion of the regional per- beneficiary limitation, must be based on the geographic location in which the home health service is actually furnished rather than the physical location of the HHA itself. III. Determination of Old or New Home Health Agencies The per-beneficiary limitation determined under section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v)(''clause v'' HHAs) will apply to all HHAs that have a 12-month cost reporting period ending during FY 1994. There are, however, HHAs that had a 52/53 week cost reporting cycle that ended in Federal FY 1994, or a 13-month cost reporting period that ended during Federal FY 1994 (as allowed in accordance with Medicare principles of reimbursement). For purposes of determining the per-beneficiary limitation, these HHAs will be deemed to be ``clause v'' HHAs. Also, an HHA that had a 12-month cost reporting period ending in Federal FY 1994 and altered its corporate structure or name is a ``clause v'' HHA for purposes of determining the per-beneficiary limitation. Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(vi) of the Act states that for new HHAs and agencies without a 12-month cost reporting that ended in FY 1994 (``clause vi'' HHAs), the per-beneficiary limitation is the median of these limitations applied to other HHAs, as determined by the Secretary. A. Less Than a Twelve-Month Cost Reporting Period During Federal FY 1994 Without exception, all HHAs that did not have a 12-month cost reporting period that ended in Federal FY 1994 will have the national per-beneficiary limitation applied to the agency's unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries for the cost reporting period beginning on and after October 1, 1997. The national per-beneficiary limitation that applies to the unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries for ``clause vi'' HHAs is in Table 3b. B. HHAs Entering the Medicare Program After Federal FY 1994 New HHAs that entered the Medicare program after Federal FY 1994 will have the national per-beneficiary limitation applied to the unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997. A new HHA is one that did not have approval to participate in the Medicare program under present or previous ownership prior to October 1, 1993. C. Other There are cases in which there could be changes in a ``clause v'' type HHA's operational structure, after Federal FY 1994, that could have an impact on the determination of the per-beneficiary limitation that is applicable to the HHA for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997. Examples of such changes are mergers, consolidations, and changes in ownership resulting in a change in the operational structure. The policies that apply when there are changes in the operational structure of an HHA after its cost reporting ended after FY 1994 are as follows: 1. Mergers or Consolidations of Like HHAs (Two or More Freestanding or Two or More Provider-Based Agencies) With Cost Reporting Periods Ending in Federal Fiscal Year 1994 There could be cases in which the merger or consolidation of two or more like HHAs (freestanding or provider-based) would not alter the surviving HHA's corporate structure, but applying the surviving HHA's per-beneficiary limitation to the combined operational structure would not be appropriate. Therefore, if two or more like HHAs (two or more freestanding agencies or two or more provider-based agencies) that had cost reporting periods that ended in Federal FY 1994 merge or consolidate after Federal FY 1994, the per-beneficiary limitation will be recalculated based on an average of the agencies' Medicare costs weighted by their unduplicated census counts in Federal FY 1994. If the agencies have different cost reporting period year ends, the costs must be inflated to common year end dates. For example, HHA 1, with a cost reporting period that ended March 31, 1994, merged on December 1, 1996 with HHA 2, with a cost reporting period that ended November 30, 1993. HHA 2's corporate structure did not change, but the operational structure changed with the inclusion of HHA 1. The Medicare allowable reasonable costs, the aggregate per-visit limitation, and the nonroutine medical supply costs of HHA 1 will be updated to November 30, 1996. The Medicare allowable costs, the aggregate per-visit limitation, and the nonroutine medical supply costs of HHA 2 will be updated to November 30, 1996. The lesser of the combined updated Medicare allowable reasonable costs or the combined updated aggregate per-visit limitation, plus the combined updated nonroutine medical supply costs will be divided by the combined unduplicated patient census counts. The weighted average per-beneficiary amount will then be further updated to October 31, 1998 to derive the per-beneficiary limitation that applies to the HHA's cost reporting period which began November 1, 1997. The same procedures would apply if HHA 1 and HHA 2 were subunits in Federal FY 1994. 2. Mergers or Consolidations When Only One of the HHAs Had a Cost Report That Ended in Federal Fiscal 1994 There could be situations in which two or more HHAs merge or consolidate into one after Federal FY 1994 and only one of the HHAs had a cost reporting period ending in Federal FY 1994. The statute is specific as to what per-beneficiary limitation applies to agencies with cost reporting periods ending in Federal FY 1994 and what per- beneficiary limitation applies to agencies that do not have a cost reporting period ending in Federal FY 1994. The two methodologies do not interrelate sufficiently to allow the application of a methodology similar to the methodology described in section III. C.1. above. Because the two methodologies do not interrelate, we have taken a position that we believe is equitable within the constraints of the statute. If HHAs merge or consolidate after Federal FY 1994 and only one of the HHAs had a cost reporting period that ended in Federal FY 1994, the agency will be considered a ``clause vi'' agency with respect to applying the per-beneficiary limitation. That is, the per- beneficiary limitation will be the national per-beneficiary limitation that applies to new agencies. 3. Complete Changes in the Operational Structure of the HHA There are situations when the costs of operations of the HHA could change either through a change of ownership or an internal reconfiguration of the operational structure within the same HHA after Federal FY 1994. Examples of this would be a freestanding agency becoming a provider-based agency or vice-versa. Even though this could be construed as an agency which has merely altered its corporate structure, the costs of operations are significantly different between a freestanding agency and a provider-based agency. We do not [[Page 15722]] believe the statute was intended to advantage or disadvantage different classes of agencies whose means of determining overhead costs are completely different. Generally, a freestanding agency has control over the overhead costs it incurs while a provider-based agency has little, if any, control over the overhead costs it incurs. Therefore, if ``clause v'' freestanding HHAs become provider-based, and vice versa, through a change in ownership or other means, after Federal FY 1994, these agencies will be considered ``clause vi'' agencies with respect to applying the per-beneficiary limitation. We also noted that branches within HHAs generally do not have direct overhead costs specifically identified to them on the Medicare cost report. HHAs that have branches report costs on the Medicare cost report as a single agency. As such, the branch does not exist as an independent agency certified by Medicare. The branch is encompassed in the parent agency's certification. Therefore, when branches within HHAs that have a cost reporting period ending in Federal FY 1994 become subunits after Federal fiscal 1994, whereby they are certified under Medicare to operate as a freestanding HHA, these new subunits will be considered ``clause vi'' agencies with respect to applying the per-beneficiary limitation. IV. Market Basket The 1993-based cost categories and weights are listed in Table 1 below. Table 1.--1993-Based Cost Categories, Basket Weights, and Price Proxies ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1993-based market Cost category basket Price proxy weight ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Compensation, including allocated 77.668 Contract Services' Labor. Wages and Salaries, Including 64.226 HHA Occupational Wage allocated Contract Services' Index. Labor. Employee benefits, including 13.442 HHA Occupational allocated Contract Services' Benefits Index. Labor. Operations & Maintenance......... 0.832 CPI-U Fuel & Other Utilities. Administrative & General, 9.569 including allocated Contract Services' Non-Labor Telephone.................... 0.725 CPI-U Telephone. Paper & Printing............. 0.529 CPI-U Household Paper, Paper Products & Stationery Supplies. Postage...................... 0.724 CPI-U Postage. Other Administrative & 7.591 CPI-Services. General, including Allocated Contract Services Non-Labor. Transportation................... 3.405 CPI-U Private Transportation. Capital-Related.................. 3.204 Insurance.................... 0.560 CPI-U Household Insurance. Fixed Capital................ 1.764 CPI-U Household Insurance. Movable Capital.............. 0.880 PPI Machinery & Equipment. Other Expenses, including 5.322 CPI-U All Items Less allocated Contract Services' Non- Food & Energy. Labor.. ------------- Total...................... 100.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ V. Methodology for Determining Per-Beneficiary Limitation A. Agency-Specific Per-Beneficiary Limitation Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v) of the Act, in part, requires that 75 percent of the per-beneficiary limitation be based on 98 percent of the reasonable costs for the agency's 12-month cost reporting period during Federal FY 1994. Reasonable costs are defined as the lesser of the actual Medicare aggregate costs of discipline services or the aggregate discipline per-visit limitation. The Medicare allowable costs of nonroutine supplies is added to this amount and multiplied by 98 percent. The result of this computation is then divided by the HHA's Federal FY 1994 unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries to derive the agency-specific limitation which will be 75 percent of the per-beneficiary limitation. The computation of the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation is performed by the HHA's intermediary. For provider-based HHAs, the reasonable costs are the lesser of line 7, columns 8 and 9, or line 14 columns 8 and 9, plus line 15, columns 8 and 9, as reported on Supplemental Worksheet H-5 (Form HCFA-2552-92-H (4/93)), of the Medicare cost report for the cost reporting period ending in Federal fiscal 1994, multiplied by 98 percent. The results are divided by the unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries, as provided by HCFA. For freestanding HHAs, the reasonable costs are the lesser of line 7, column 9, or line 14, column 9, plus line 17, columns 7 and 8, as reported on Worksheet C (Form HCFA-1728-86 (6/76)) of the Medicare cost report for the cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994, multiplied by 98 percent. The results are divided by the unduplicated census count for Medicare beneficiaries, as provided by HCFA. The agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation must also be adjusted using the latest available market basket factors to reflect expected cost increases occurring between the cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994 and the cost reporting period ending during FY 1998. The factors for inflating the agency-specific per- beneficiary limitation are provided on Tables 2 and 5 or determined using Table 6. In establishing the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation, it is important that the amount determined is an accurate reflection of the home health services provided to Medicare beneficiaries in Federal FY 1994. Because the per-beneficiary limitation required by section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v)(I) of the Act is established, in part, using agency- specific cost report data during Federal FY 1994, and the unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries [[Page 15723]] as may have been reported on the cost report is not being used in the computation, we are allowing HHAs to request a review of the calculation of the agency-specific limitation which includes the number of unduplicated counts of Medicare beneficiaries used in the computation. HHAs will have 180 days from the notification date of the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation to request a review from its intermediary that the number of unduplicated census counts of Medicare beneficiaries as provided by HCFA is incorrect or other data from the Federal FY 1994 cost report used in the calculation of the agency- specific amount is/are incorrect. The HHA would bear the burden of proof to document its proffer of the appropriate number of unduplicated census counts of Medicare beneficiaries or the other appropriate data used in the calculation. An unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries is a count of one for each Medicare patient receiving home health services from an HHA during its cost reporting period, regardless of the number of services or the number of different plans of care that the patient may have been under during the HHA's cost reporting period. If the agency can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the intermediary that a change should be made, the intermediary would appropriately recalculate the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation. The intermediary must provide to the HHA its determination, in writing, whether or not an adjustment is provided. B. Census Division Standardized Regional Average Per-Beneficiary Limitations Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v)(I) of the Act requires, in part, that 25 percent of the per-beneficiary limitation be based on 98 percent of the standardized regional average of such costs for the agency's census division for cost reporting periods ending during Federal FY 1994 and such costs updated by the home health market basket index. The standardized regional average per-beneficiary limitations by census region were determined by extracting settled actual data from Medicare cost reports ending in Federal FY 1994 for freestanding and provider-based HHAs. The unduplicated census counts in the data file were replaced with the unduplicated census counts of Medicare beneficiaries generated using the SAF. Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(iii) of the Act, as amended by section 4604 of BBA '97, requires that we base the payments for home health services on the location where the services are provided. The file created from the SAF accumulated the number of beneficiaries in each MSA/non-MSA area serviced by each HHA. This file was created by matching all claims to each agency's cost reporting period to determine the unduplicated census counts by MSA/ non-MSA area. This file was merged with the cost report file and replaced the unduplicated census counts reported by the HHAs on the Medicare cost report. HHAs were grouped within their appropriate census region based on the HHAs' State and county code. Agencies not located in a census region, e.g. Puerto Rico, were grouped separately rather than arbitrarily assigned to a census region. In order to account for the statutory requirement that the wage index used in calculating the limitations be based on the location where the home health service was furnished rather than the location of the HHA, it was necessary to develop a wage-index weighted by the number of beneficiaries in each MSA/non-MSA in each census region. The unduplicated census counts of Medicare beneficiaries for each MSA/non- MSA serviced by the HHA were multiplied by the appropriate wage index that applied to that MSA/non-MSA. The product of these computations were totaled for each HHA to yield a wage index adjusted unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries. The lesser of the Medicare reasonable costs or aggregate per-visit limitation plus nonroutine medical supplies for each HHA were totaled for each census region. The total costs in each census region was divided by the total wage index adjusted unduplicated census counts of Medicare beneficiaries in each region to arrive at a standardized average cost per-beneficiary for the labor component. This approximates the same effect as though each HHA in the census region had its average costs per-beneficiary adjusted by its average wage-index for the beneficiaries serviced in its service areas. We then adjusted the average per-beneficiary limitations using the latest available market basket factors to reflect expected cost increases occurring between the cost reporting periods that ended in Federal FY 1994 and September 30, 1998 excluding any changes in the home health market basket with respect to cost reporting periods which began on or after, July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996 as shown in Table 2 below. The statute is silent with respect to the regional per-beneficiary limitation that would apply to Puerto Rico and Guam. Neither of these areas fall within the census divisions referred in the statute. We do not believe it was the intent of Congress to have HHAs in Puerto Rico and Guam subject to a blend of 75 percent agency-specific per beneficiary limitation and 25 percent of zero since they do not fall within the census divisions. Therefore, based on the HHAs in our data base that are located in Puerto Rico and Guam, we have developed regional per-beneficiary limitations specific to Puerto Rico and Guam using the same methodology as we used for the census divisions. These per-beneficiary limitations for which 25 percent of the per-beneficiary limitation will be based can be found on Table 3c. C. National Per-Beneficiary Limitation Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(vi)(I) of the Act, as added by section 4602(c) of BBA '97, requires that for new HHAs and HHAs without a 12- month cost reporting period ending in Federal FY 1994, the per- beneficiary limitation will be the median of these limitations applied to other HHAs. This means that we must establish a national per- beneficiary limitation based on ``the median of these limits (or the Secretary's best estimates thereof) applied to other HHAs as determined by the Secretary'', referring back to the per-beneficiary limitations that apply to HHAs that have a cost reporting period ending in Federal FY 1994. This required us to calculate the per-beneficiary limitation for each HHA in our data base, blending the 75 percent agency-specific per-beneficiary component with the 25 percent census region per- beneficiary component. Because the wage index will be applied to the labor component of the census region per-beneficiary limitation for ``clause v'' HHAs in determining the aggregate per-beneficiary limitation, we adjusted the census region per-beneficiary limitations for the varying effects of the wage indexes. This adjustment methodology used a beneficiary-weighted wage adjustment factor based on the geographic location of beneficiaries in our data base as described in B. above. We blended the agency-specific per-beneficiary component with the standardized census region per-beneficiary component, arrayed the results, and established the median per-beneficiary amount. This is the ``unadjusted median per-beneficiary limitation''. In order to apply a wage index adjustment factor to the national per-beneficiary limitation, the median per-beneficiary limitation had to be adjusted to standardize the agency-specific per-beneficiary component in the same fashion as the census region per-beneficiary limitation component so that the final labor component to which the new agencies [[Page 15724]] would apply their appropriate wage indexes would be uniformly standardized in both its agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation component and its census region per-beneficiary component. To standardize the agency-specific per-beneficiary component of the median per-beneficiary limitation, we calculated an adjustment factor to apply to the median per-beneficiary limitations. The adjustment factor was determined by calculating the ratio of the fully standardized per- beneficiary median (standardized for both the agency specific and the census region amounts) and the unadjusted blended median of the ``clause v'' agencies. It is the labor component of this adjusted median of the per-beneficiary limitations for the agencies in our data base, standardized in both the 75 percent agency-specific per beneficiary limitation and the 25 percent census region per-beneficiary limitation components to which new agencies will apply their appropriate wage indexes. In summary, we calculated a national per-beneficiary limitation based on the median of the per-beneficiary limitations that apply to HHAs that have a cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994. To establish this national per-beneficiary limitation, we blended 75 percent agency-specific per-beneficiary component with the 25 percent census region division per-beneficiary component for each agency in our data base, arrayed the results and determined the median. The application of this median per-beneficiary limitation requires that we apply a wage index to the labor component of the national per- beneficiary limitation. In calculating the median to be used as the national per-beneficiary limitation for new agencies and agencies without a 12-month cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994, we recognized that the agency-specific component was not standardized for the effects of area wage differences. In order to apply a wage index, we determined an appropriate adjustment factor to apply to the national per-beneficiary limitation that effectively took out any differences in area wages for the agency-specific component of the median per-beneficiary limitation. The result is a fully standardized national per-beneficiary limitation. D. Update of Data Base The data used to develop the per-beneficiary limitations and the national per-beneficiary limitation was adjusted using the latest available market basket factors to reflect expected cost increases occurring between the cost reporting periods contained in our database and September 30, 1998, excluding any changes in the home health market basket with respect to cost reporting periods which began on or after July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996. The following inflation factors were used in calculating the Census region and national per-beneficiary limitations: Table 2.--Factors for Inflating Database Dollars to September 30, 1998 [Inflation adjustment factors 1] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fiscal Year End 1993 1994 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ October 31.................................... 1.08619 ........... November 30................................... 1.08349 ........... December 31................................... 1.08080 ........... January 31.................................... ........... 1.07813 February 28................................... ........... 1.07550 March 31...................................... ........... 1.0729 April 30...................................... ........... 1.07046 May 31........................................ ........... 1.06800 June 30....................................... ........... 1.06565 July 31....................................... ........... 1.06354 August 31..................................... ........... 1.06165 September 30.................................. ........... 1.05993 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 Source: The Home Health Agency Price Index, produced by HCFA. The forecasts are from Standard and Poor's DRI 3rd QTR 1997; @USSIM/ TREND25YR0897@CISSIM/Control973 forecast exercise which has historical data through 1997:2. Multiplying nominal dollars for a given FY end by their respective inflation adjustment factor will express those dollars in the dollar levels for the FY ending September 30, 1998. The procedure followed to develop these tables, based on requirements from BBA '97, was to hold the June 1994 level for input price index constant through June 1996. From July 1996 forward, we trended the revised index forward using the percentage gain each month from the HCFA Home Health Agency Input Price Index. Thus, the monthly trend of the revised index is the same as that of the HCFA market basket for the period from July 1996 forward. E. Short Period Adjustment Factors for Cost Reporting Periods Consisting of Fewer Than 12 Months HHAs with cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997 may have cost reporting periods that are less than 12 months in length. This may happen, for example, when a new provider enters the Medicare program after its selected FY has already begun, or when a provider experiences a change of ownership before the end of the cost reporting period. As explained in section V. of this preamble, the data used in calculating the census region and the national per-beneficiary limitations were updated to September 30, 1998. Therefore, the cost limitations published in this document are for a 12-month cost reporting period beginning October 1, 1997 and ending September 30, 1998. For 12-month cost reporting periods beginning after October 1, 1997 and before October 1, 1998, cost reporting period adjustment factors are provided in Table 5. However, when a cost reporting period consists of fewer than 12 months, adjustments must be made to the data that have been developed for use with 12-month cost reporting periods. To promote the efficient dissemination of cost limitations to agencies with cost reporting periods of fewer than 12 months, we are publishing an example and tables to enable intermediaries to calculate the applicable adjustment factors. Cost reporting periods of fewer than 12 months may not necessarily begin on the first of the month or end on the last day of the month. In order to simplify the process in calculating ``short [[Page 15725]] period'' adjustment factors, if the short cost reporting period begins before the sixteenth of the month, we will consider the period to have begun on the first of that month. If the start period begins on or after the sixteenth of the month, it will be considered to have begun at the beginning of the next month. Also, if the short period ends before the sixteenth of the month, we will consider the period to have ended at the end of the preceding month; if the short period ends on or after the sixteenth of the month, it will be considered to have ended at the end of that month. Example 1. After approval by its intermediary, a ``clause v'' HHA changed its FY end from June 30 to December 31. Therefore, the HHA had a short cost reporting period beginning on July 1, 1998 and ending on December 31, 1998. The cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994 would have been the cost reporting period ending on June 30, 1994. The per visit limitation that applies to this short period must be adjusted as follows: Step 1--From Table 6, sum the index levels for the months of July 1998 through December 1998: 6.63687 Step 2--Divide the results from Step 1 by the number of months in short period: 6.6387 =1.106145 Step 3--From Table 6, sum the index levels for the months in the common period of October 1997 through September 1998: 13:06926 Step 4--Divide the results in Step 3 by the number of months in the common period: 13.06926 12 = 1.089105 Step 5--Divide the results from Step 2 by the results from Step 4. This is the adjustment factor to be applied to the published per- beneficiary limitations: 1.106145 1.1089106 = 1.015646 Step 6--Apply the results from Step 5 to the published per- beneficiary limitations in the same manner as shown in the example in VIII.C. VI. Exceptions or Adjustments to Per-beneficiary Limitation The Medicare regulations at 42 CFR 413.30 contain the general rules under which HCFA may establish limitations on provider costs, including provisions under which a provider may request a reclassification, exception, or exemption from the cost limitations under that section. We do not believe that the Congress intended these general rules to apply to the establishment of the per-beneficiary limitations. First, we note that unlike other provisions of the statute that provide specific language for exceptions or exemptions to the limitations on costs, the statute is silent with respect to providing exceptions or exemptions to the per-beneficiary limitations. Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(ii) of the Act, which addresses the application of the per-visit limitations, is very specific that the Secretary may provide exemptions or exceptions to the per-visit limitations that are applied on a discipline basis. There is no similar language under sections 1861(v)(1)(L)(v) and 1861(v)(1)(L)(vi) of the Act, which provides for the establishment of the per-beneficiary limitations. Moreover, it seems unlikely that Congress intended for exceptions or exemptions to apply to the per-beneficiary limitations since in establishing the mid- session budget, there were no monies earmarked from the projected Medicare savings to pay for exemptions or exceptions to the per- beneficiary limitation. Therefore, we are not allowing agencies to file for exceptions or exemptions to the per-beneficiary limitations. We are revising section 413.30(a) to recognize the addition of the per-beneficiary cost limitation as a limitation on costs. Also, we are revising section 413.30(c) to state that HHAs may not request a reclassification, an exception, or an exemption from the per- beneficiary cost limitation. VII. Review of the Agency-Specific Per-Beneficiary Limitation For HHAs with a cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994, 75 percent of the per-beneficiary limitation is based on the Medicare data contained in that cost report. We recognize that for most HHAs, that cost report has been settled and unless the HHA has an appeal with respect to the cost settlement pending for that FY, the data contained within the agency-specific per- beneficiary calculation has been settled. HHAs that have pending appeals (for example, an outstanding cost limitation exception to the per-visit limitation or appeals of adjustments resulting from Medicare principles of reimbursement) that may impact the cost reporting data used in calculation of the agency-specific portion of the per- beneficiary limitation, will have the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation recalculated when the appeal is favorably resolved on behalf of the HHA. There are, however, certain data used from the cost report in calculating the per-beneficiary limitations that do not impact the settlement of the cost report, that is, the use of the number of unduplicated census counts of Medicare beneficiaries whereby a reopening request of the cost report would not be warranted. This is particularly of concern since the unduplicated census counts on the Medicare cost reports have been alleged to be incorrect and HCFA will be providing the unduplicated census counts to be used by the intermediaries in calculating the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation. Given the importance of the calculation of the agency-specific per- beneficiary limitation, we are allowing HHAs 180 days after the date of the notice by the intermediary of the HHA's agency-specific per- beneficiary limitation to request a review of the agency-specific per- beneficiary calculation. The request may address the specific data used in calculating the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation as shown on the Medicare cost report (that is, the lesser of Medicare reasonable costs or the aggregate per-visit limitation), the costs of nonroutine medical supplies, the unduplicated census count provided by HCFA, or the appropriate market basket increases, as provided in this document. This request for review may also address the calculation such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division. This request for review is not applicable to those cost report settlement appeals, which may have an impact on the data used in calculating the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation and are pending under another authority under the Medicare regulations or statute. The agency's request must include sufficient documentation for the intermediary to determine that a recalculation of the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation is warranted. After receipt of all the necessary documentation needed to make a sound determination on the agency's request, the intermediary must respond to the request within 90 days of receiving the fully documented request. VIII. Computing the Per-Beneficiary Limitation A. Agency-Specific Per-Beneficiary Limitation To arrive at the agency-specific limitation, which will represent 75 percent of the total per-beneficiary limitation that is to apply to the unduplicated census count of the Medicare beneficiaries for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997, the intermediary will calculate as follows from data on the Medicare cost report for the cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994: For provider-based HHAs, the lesser of line 7, columns 8 and 9, or line 14, columns 8 and 9 plus line 15 columns 8 and 9, as reported on Supplemental Worksheet H-5 (Form HCFA-2552-92-H(4/93) OMB approval number 0938-0050, expiration date 08/31/2000), multiplied by 98 percent and the product divided by the unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries, [[Page 15726]] as provided by HCFA, times the appropriate market basket increases from Tables 2 and 5; determined using Table 6. For freestanding HHAs, the lesser of line 7, column 9, or line 14, column 9, plus line 17, columns 7 and 8, as reported on Worksheet C (Form HCFA-1728-86 (6/76)), multiplied by 98 percent and the product divided by the unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries, as provided by HCFA, times the appropriate market basket increases from Tables 2 and 5 or determined using Table 6. The product of the calculation of the agency-specific limitation is multiplied by 75 percent to arrive at the agency-specific portion of the per-beneficiary limitation. To arrive at the regional census division per-beneficiary limitation, which will represent 25 percent of the overall per- beneficiary limitation, the HHA's intermediary first determines the adjusted labor-related component by multiplying the labor-related component of the appropriate regional census division per-beneficiary limitation where the beneficiary(s) received HHA services by the appropriate wage index based on where the beneficiary(s) received HHA services. The nonlabor component of the appropriate regional census division per-beneficiary limitation is added to the adjusted labor component and multiplied by 98 percent. The results are then multiplied by 25 percent. The 75 percent agency-specific portion is added to the 25 percent adjusted regional census division portion to arrive at the adjusted per-beneficiary limitation, which will be multiplied by the total unduplicated patient census count of patients for whom services were furnished in that area. A separate per-beneficiary limitation has to be calculated for each MSA and/or nonMSA serviced by the HHA. The aggregate limitation for all MSA and/or non-MSA areas for each HHA will be compared to the lower of the Medicare reasonable costs or the aggregate per-visit limitation and the lowest amount after this comparison is the allowable Medicare reasonable costs for payment purposes. The following is an example of how the per-beneficiary limitations are calculated for ``clause v'' type agencies which provide services to Medicare beneficiaries in more than one MSA area. The aggregate per-beneficiary limitation calculation example is given at section IX. Example: Calculation of Per-Beneficiary Limitations for an HHA Furnishing Services to Patients Both in Dallas, Texas and Patients in Rural Texas Blended Per-Beneficiary Limitation for Services in Dallas MSA Agency-Specific Component 1. Agency-Specific Per-beneficiary Limitation $6,000. (As calculated by the intermediary) 2. Adjusted Agency-Specific Per-beneficiary Limitation (Line 1 x .75)=$4,500. Census Region Division Component 3. Labor Portion of West South Central Region Per-beneficiary Limitation $4,456.47. (From Table 3a) 4. Dallas, TX Wage Index .9703. (From Table 4a) 5. Adjusted Labor Portion (Line 3 Times Line 4)= $4,324.11. 6. Nonlabor Portion of West South Central Region Per-beneficiary Limitation $1,281.37. (From Table 3a) 7. Adjusted West South Central Region Per-beneficiary Limitation (((Line 5 Plus Line 6)X .98) X .25)= $1,373.34. Agency-Specific/Census Region Division Blended Per-Beneficiary Limitation 8. Blended Per-beneficiary Limitation for HHA services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries in Dallas, Texas(Line 2 Plus Line 7) = $5,873.34. Per-Beneficiary Limitation for Services in Rural Texas/Census Region Division Component 9. Labor Portion of West South Central Region Per-beneficiary = $4,456.47. (From Table 3a) 10. Rural Texas Wage Index = .7404. (From Table 4b) 11. Adjusted Labor Portion (Line 9 X Line 10) = $3,299.57. 12. Nonlabor portion of West South Central Region Per- beneficiary Limitation = $1,281.37. (From Table 3a) 13. Adjusted Per-beneficiary Limitation (((Line 11 Plus Line 12)X .98) X.25) = $1,122.33. Agency-Specific/Census Region Division Blended Per-Beneficiary Limitation 14. Blended Rural Per-beneficiary Limitation for HHA services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries in rural Texas (Line 2 Plus Line 13) = $5,622.33. The process shown in the above examples would have to be repeated for each MSA and/or non-MSA where the HHA has an unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries which received HHA services. B. National Per-Beneficiary Limitation New HHAs, HHAs without a 12-month cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994, and certain other HHAs described in section III.C. will be subject to a national per-beneficiary limitation. As with the census region division per-beneficiary limitations, the national per-beneficiary limitation has a labor-related component and a nonlabor component. To arrive at the adjusted national per-beneficiary limitation, which is to apply to each unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiary based on where the HHA services were furnished, the intermediary first determines the adjusted labor-related component by multiplying the labor-related component of the national per- beneficiary limitation by the appropriate wage index based on where the beneficiary received the HHA services. The sum of the adjusted labor-related component and nonlabor component is the adjusted national per-beneficiary limitation applicable to the unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries in the area for which the wage index was used. The following is an example of the calculation of the per-beneficiary limitations for a new HHA providing services to Medicare beneficiaries in more than one MSA area. Example: Calculation of Adjusted National Per-Beneficiary Limitations for a Provider-Based HHA Providing HHA Services to an Unduplicated Census Count of Medicare Beneficiaries of in Dallas, Texas, and an Unduplicated Census Count of Medicare Beneficiaries in Rural Texas National Per-Beneficiary Limitation for Dallas, Texas 1. Labor component of national per-beneficiary limitation = $2,607.07. (From Table 3b) 2. Wage-index applicable to Dallas, Texas = .9703 (From Table 4a) 3. Adjusted labor component (Line 1 X Line 2) = $2,529.64. 4. Nonlabor component of national per-beneficiary limitation $749.62. (From Table 4b) 5. Adjusted national per-beneficiary limitation (Line 3 Plus Line 4) X .98 = $3,213.67. National Per-Beneficiary Limitation for Rural Texas 6. Labor component of national per-beneficiary limitation = $2,607.07. (From Table 4b) 7. Wage index applicable to rural Texas = .7404. (From Table 4b) 8. Adjusted labor component of national per-beneficiary (Line 6 X Line 7) = $1,930.27. 9. Nonlabor component of national per-beneficiary limitation = $749.62. (From Table 3b) 10. Adjusted national per-beneficiary limitation ((Line 8 Plus Line 9) X .98) = $2,626.29. C. Adjustment Factor for Reporting Year Beginning After October 1, 1997 and Before October 1, 1998 If an HHA has a 12-month cost reporting period beginning on or after November 1, 1997, the adjusted census region division per- beneficiary [[Page 15727]] limitation or the adjusted national per-beneficiary limitation is again revised by an adjustment factor from Table 5 that corresponds to the month and year in which the cost reporting period begins. Each factor represents the compounded rate of monthly increase derived from the projected annual increase in the market basket index, and is used to account for inflation in costs that will occur after the date on which the per-beneficiary limitations become effective. In adjusting the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation for the market basket increases since the end of the cost reporting period ending during Federal year 1994, the intermediary should increase the agency-specific per-beneficiary limitation to September 30, 1998. Thus, when the per-beneficiary limitation needs to be further adjusted for the cost reporting period, the adjusted blended per-beneficiary limitation can be adjusted by the same factor. For example, if the HHAs in the examples above had a cost reporting period beginning January 1, 1998, its per-beneficiary limitations would be further adjusted as follows: Computation of Revised Per-Beneficiary Limitations Blended per- beneficiary limitation for Dallas MSA = $5,873.34. Adjustment factor from Table 5. 1.00781 Adjusted blended per-beneficiary limitation for Dallas MSA $5,919.21 National per-beneficiary limitation for Dallas, Texas = 3,213.67 Adjustment factor from Table 5. 1.00781 Adjusted national per-beneficiary limitation = $3,238.77 IX. Schedule of Per-Beneficiary Limitations The schedule of per-beneficiary limitations set forth below applies to cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997. The intermediaries will compute the adjusted per-beneficiary limitations using the wage index(s) published in Tables 4a and 4b of section X. for each MSA and/or non MSA for which the HHA provides services to Medicare beneficiaries. The intermediary will notify each HHA it services of its applicable per-beneficiary limitation(s) for the area(s) where the HHA furnishes HHA services to Medicare beneficiaries. Each HHA's aggregate per-beneficiary limitation cannot be determined prospectively, but depends on each HHA's unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries by location of the HHA services furnished for the cost reporting periods subject to this document. Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(vi)(II) of the Act as added by section 4602(c) of BBA ``97, requires the per-beneficiary limitations to be prorated among HHAs for Medicare beneficiaries who use services furnished by more than one HHA. The per-beneficiary limitation will be prorated based on a ratio of the number of visits furnished to the individual beneficiary by the HHA during its cost reporting period to the total number of visits furnished by all HHAs to that individual beneficiary during the same period. The proration of the per-beneficiary limitation will be done based on the fraction of services the beneficiary received from the HHA. For example, if an HHA furnished 100 visits to an individual beneficiary during its cost reporting period ending September 30, 1998, and that same individual received a total of 400 visits during that same period, the HHA would count the beneficiary as a .25 unduplicated census count of Medicare patient for the cost reporting period ending September 30, 1998. The HHA costs that are subject to the per-beneficiary limitations include the costs of nonroutine medical supplies furnished in conjunction with patient care. Durable medical equipment and drugs directly identifiable as services to an individual patient are excluded from the per-beneficiary limitations and are paid without regard to this schedule of per-beneficiary limitations. The intermediary will determine the aggregate per-beneficiary limitation for each HHA by multiplying the unduplicated census count of Medicare beneficiaries according to the location where the services are furnished by the HHA, by the respective per-beneficiary limitation. The sum of these amounts is compared to the lesser of the HHA's total allowable costs or the aggregate per-visit limitation plus the allowable Medicare costs of nonroutine medical supplies. An example of how the aggregate per-beneficiary limitation is computed for an HHA providing HHA services to Medicare beneficiaries in both Dallas, Texas and rural Texas is as follows: Example: HHA X, a HHA located in Dallas, TX, has unduplicated census count of 400 Medicare beneficiaries in the Dallas MSA and an unduplicated census count of 200 Medicare beneficiaries in rural Texas during its 12-month cost reporting period ending September 30, 1998. For simplicity, we are using the same blended per-beneficiary limitation that is used in the example under VIII. A above. The aggregate per-beneficiary limitation is calculated as follows: Determining the Aggregate Per-Beneficiary Limitation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Per Unduplicated beneficiary census count Total MSA/non-MSA area limitation of Medicare limitation (\1\) beneficiaries ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dallas, TX..................... $5,873.34 400 $2,349,336 Rural, TX...................... 5,622.33 200 1,124,466 ------------ Aggregate Limitation..... ........... ............. 3,473,802 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \1\ Blended per-beneficiary limitation adjusted by the appropriate wage index. Table 3a.--Standardized Per-Beneficiary Limitation by Census Region Division, Labor/Nonlabor ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Labor Nonlabor Census region division component component ------------------------------------------------------------------------ New England (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT).... $2,670.73 $ 767.92 Middle Atlantic (NJ, NY, PA)............ 1,979.21 569.08 South Atlantic (DE, DC, FL, GA, MD, NC, SC, VA, WV)............................ 2,985.69 858.48 East North Central (IL, IN, MI, OH, WI). 2,421.00 696.11 [[Page 15728]] East South Central (AL, KY, MS, TN)..... 4,590.61 1,319.94 West North Central (IA, KS, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD)................................ 2,325.36 668.62 West South Central (AR, LA, OK, TX)..... 4,456.47 1,281.37 Mountain (AZ, CO, ID, MT, NV, NM, UT, WY).................................... 2,936.88 844.44 Pacific (AK, CA, HI, OR, WA)............ 2,275.12 654.17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Table 3b.--Standardized Per-Beneficiary Limitation for New Agencies and Agencies Without a 12-Month Cost Report Ending During Federal FY 1994 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Labor Nonlabor component component ------------------------------------------------------------------------ National................................ $2,607.07 $ 749.62 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Table 3c.--Standardized Per-Beneficiary Limitations for Puerto Rico and Guam ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Labor Nonlabor component component ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Puerto Rico............................. $1,940.26 $ 557.88 Guam.................................... $1,873.76 $ 538.76 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ X. Wage Indexes Table 4a.--Wage Index for Urban Areas ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Urban area (constituent counties or county equivalents) Wage index ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0040.................. Abilene, TX; Taylor, TX............ 0.8287 0060.................. Aguadilla, PR; Aguada, PR; 0.4188 Aguadilla, PR; Moca, PR. 0080.................. Akron, OH; Portage, OH; Summit, OH. 0.9772 0120.................. Albany, GA; Dougherty, GA; Lee, GA. 0.7914 0160.................. Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY; 0.8480 Albany, NY; Montgomery, NY; Rensselaer, NY; Saratoga, NY; Schenectady, NY; Schoharie, NY. 0200.................. Albuquerque, NM; Bernalillo, NM; 0.9309 Sandoval, NM; Valencia, NM. 0220.................. Alexandria, LA; Rapides, LA........ 0.8162 0240.................. Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA; 1.0086 Carbon, PA; Lehigh, PA; Northampton, PA. 0280.................. Altoona, PA; Blair, PA............. 0.9137 0320.................. Amarillo, TX; Potter, TX; Randall, 0.9425 TX. 0380.................. AK Anchorage, AK; Anchorage........ 1.2842 0440.................. Ann Arbor, MI; Lenawee, MI; 1.1785 Livingston, MI; Washtenaw, MI. 0450.................. Anniston, AL; Calhoun, AL.......... 0.8266 0460.................. Appleton-Oshkosh-Neenah, WI; 0.8996 Calumet, WI; Outagamie, WI; Winnebago, WI. 0470.................. Arecibo, PR; Arecibo, PR; Camuy, 0.4218 PR; Hatillo, PR. 0480.................. Asheville, NC; Buncombe, NC; 0.9072 Madison, NC. 0500.................. Athens, GA; Clarke, GA; Madison, 0.9087 GA; Oconee, GA. 0520.................. Atlanta, GA; Barrow, GA; Bartow, 0.9823 GA; Carroll, GA; Cherokee, GA; Clayton, GA; Cobb, GA; Coweta, GA; DeKalb, GA; Douglas, GA; Fayette, GA; Forsyth, GA; Fulton, GA; Gwinnett, GA; Henry, GA; Newton, GA; Paulding, GA; Pickens, GA; Rockdale, GA; Spalding, GA; Walton, GA. 0560.................. Atlantic City-Cape May, NJ; 1.1155 Atlantic City, NJ; Cape May, NJ. 0600.................. Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC; Columbia, GA; 0.9333 McDuffie, GA; Richmond, GA; Aiken, SC; Edgefield, SC. 0640.................. Austin-San Marcos, TX; Bastrop, TX; 0.9133 Caldwell, TX; Hays, TX; Travis, TX; Williamson, TX. 0680.................. Bakersfield, CA; Kern, CA.......... 1.0014 0720.................. Baltimore, MD; Anne Arundel, MD; 0.9689 Baltimore, MD; Baltimore City, MD; Carroll, MD; Harford, MD; Howard, MD; Queen Anne, MD. 0733.................. Bangor, ME; Penobscot, ME.......... 0.9478 0743.................. Barnstable-Yarmouth, MA; 1.4291 Barnstable, MA. 0760.................. Baton Rouge, LA; Ascension, LA; 0.8382 East Baton Rouge, LA; Livingston, LA; West Baton Rouge, LA. 0840.................. Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX; Hardin, 0.8593 TX; Jefferson, TX; Orange, TX. 0860.................. Bellingham, WA; Whatcom, WA........ 1.1221 0870.................. Benton Harbor, MI; Berrien, MI..... 0.8634 0875.................. Bergen-Passaic, NJ; Bergen, NJ; 1.2156 Passaic, NJ. 0880.................. Billings, MT; Yellowstone, MT...... 0.9783 0920.................. Biloxi-Gulfport-Pascagoula, MS; 0.8415 Hancock, MS; Harrison, MS; Jackson, MS. 0960.................. Binghamton, NY; Broome, NY; Tioga, 0.8914 NY. 1000.................. Birmingham, AL; Blount, AL; 0.9005 Jefferson, AL; St. Clair, AL; Shelby, AL. 1010.................. Bismarck, ND; Burleigh, ND; Morton, 0.7695 ND. 1020.................. Bloomington, IN; Monroe, IN........ 0.9128 1040.................. Bloomington-Normal, IL; McLean, IL. 0.8733 [[Page 15729]] 1080.................. Boise City, ID; Ada, ID; Canyon, ID 0.8856 1123.................. Boston-Worcester Lawrence-Lowell- 1.1506 Brockton, MA-NH; Bristol, MA; Essex, MA; Middlesex, MA; Norfolk, MA; Plymouth, MA; Suffolk, MA; Worcester, MA; Hillsborough, NH; Merrimack, NH; Rockingham, NH; Strafford, NH. 1125.................. Boulder-Longmont, CO; Boulder, CO.. 1.0015 1145.................. Brazoria, TX; Brazoria, TX......... 0.9341 1150.................. Bremerton, WA; Kitsap, WA.......... 1.0999 1240.................. Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, 0.8740 TX; Cameron, TX. 1260.................. Bryan-College Station, TX; Brazos, 0.8571 TX. 1280.................. Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY; Erie, 0.9272 NY; Niagara, NY. 1303.................. Burlington, VT; Chittenden, VT; 1.0142 Franklin, VT; Grand Isle, VT;. 1310.................. Caguas, PR; Caguas, PR; Cayey, PR; 0.4459 Cidra, PR; Gurabo, PR; San Lorenzo, PR. 1320.................. Canton-Massillon, OH; Carroll, OH; 0.8961 Stark, OH. 1350.................. Casper, WY; Natrona, WY............ 0.9013 1360.................. Cedar Rapids, IA; Linn, IA......... 0.8529 1400.................. Champaign-Urbana, IL; Champaign, IL 0.8824 1440.................. Charleston-North Charleston, SC; 0.8807 Berkeley, SC; Charleston, SC; Dorchester, SC. 1450.................. Charleston, WV; Kanawha, WV; 0.9142 Putnam, WV. 1520.................. Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC- 0.9710 SC; Cabarrus, NC; Gaston, NC; Lincoln, NC; Mecklenburg, NC; Rowan, NC; Union, NC; York, SC. 1540.................. Charlottesville, VA; Albemarle, VA; 0.9051 Charlottesville City, VA; Fluvanna, VA; Greene, VA. 1560.................. Chattanooga, TN-GA; Catoosa, GA; 0.8658 Dade, GA; Walker, GA; Hamilton, TN; Marion, TN. 1580.................. Cheyenne, WY; Laramie, WY.......... 0.7555 1600.................. Chicago, IL; Cook, IL; DeKalb, IL; 1.0860 DuPage, IL; Grundy, IL; Kane, IL; Kendall, IL; Lake, IL; McHenry, IL; Will, IL. 1620.................. Chico-Paradise, CA; Butte, CA...... 1.0429 1640.................. Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN; Dearborn, IN; 0.9474 Ohio, IN; Boone, KY; Campbell, KY; Gallatin, KY; Grant, KY; Kenton, KY; Pendleton, KY; Brown, OH; Clermont, OH; Hamilton, OH; Warren, OH. 1660.................. Clarksville-Hopkinsville, TN-KY; 0.7852 Christian, KY; Montgomery, TN. 1680.................. Cleveland-Lorain-Elyria, OH; 0.9804 Ashtabula, OH; Cuyahoga, OH; Geauga, OH; Lake, OH; Lorain, OH; Medina, OH. 1720.................. Colorado Springs, CO; El Paso, CO.. 0.9316 1740.................. Columbia, MO; Boone, MO............ 0.9001 1760.................. Columbia, SC; Lexington, SC; 0.9192 Richland, SC. 1800.................. Columbus, GA-AL; Russell, AL; 0.8288 Chattanoochee, GA; Harris, GA; Muscogee, GA. 1840.................. Columbus, OH; Delaware, OH; 0.9793 Fairfield, OH; Franklin, OH; Licking, OH; Madison, OH; Pickaway, OH. 1880.................. Corpus Christi, TX; Nueces, TX; San 0.8945 Patricio, TX. 1900.................. Cumberland, MD-WV; Allegany, MD; 0.8822 Mineral, WV. 1920.................. Dallas, TX; Collin, TX; Dallas, TX; 0.9703 Denton, TX; Ellis, TX; Henderson, TX; Hunt, TX; Kaufman, TX; Rockwall, TX. 1950.................. Danville, VA; Danville City, VA; 0.8146 Pittsylvania, VA. 1960.................. Davenport-Rock Island-Moline, IA- 0.8405 IL; Scott, IA; Henry, IL; Rock Island, IL. 2000.................. Dayton-Springfield, OH; Clark, OH; 0.9584 Greene, OH; Miami, OH; Montgomery, OH. 2020.................. Daytona Beach, FL; Flagler, FL; 0.8375 Volusia, FL. 2030.................. Decatur, AL; Lawrence, AL; Morgan, 0.8286 AL. 2040.................. Decatur, IL; Macon, IL............. 0.7915 2080.................. Denver, CO; Adams, CO; Arapahoe, 1.0386 CO; Denver, CO; Douglas, CO; Jefferson, CO. 2120.................. Des Moines, IA; Dallas, IA; Polk, 0.8837 IA; Warren, IA. 2160.................. Detroit, MI; Lapeer, MI; Macomb, 1.0825 MI; Monroe, MI; Oakland, MI; St. Clair, MI; Wayne, MI. 2180.................. Dothan, AL; Dale, AL; Houston, AL.. 0.8070 2190.................. Dover, DE; Kent, DE................ 0.9303 2200.................. Dubuque, IA; Dubuque, IA........... 0.8088 2240.................. Duluth-Superior, MN-WI; St. Louis, 0.9779 MN; Douglas, WI. 2281.................. Dutchess County, NY; Dutchess, NY.. 1.0632 2290.................. Eau Claire, WI; Chippewa, WI; Eau 0.8764 Claire, WI. 2320.................. El Paso, TX; El Paso, TX........... 1.0123 2330.................. Elkhart-Goshen, IN; Elkhart, IN.... 0.9081 2335.................. Elmira, NY; Chemung, NY............ 0.8247 2340.................. Enid, OK; Garfield, OK............. 0.7962 2360.................. Erie, PA; Erie, PA................. 0.8862 2400.................. Eugene-Springfield, OR; Lane, OR... 1.1435 2440.................. Evansville-Henderson, IN-KY; Posey, 0.8641 IN; Vanderburgh, IN; Warrick, IN; Henderson, KY. 2520.................. Fargo-Moorhead, ND-MN; Clay, MN; 0.8837 Cass, ND. 2560.................. Fayetteville, NC; Cumberland, NC... 0.8734 2580.................. Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR; 0.7461 Benton, AR; Washington, AR. 2620.................. Flagstaff, AZ-UT; Coconino, AZ; 0.9115 Kane, UT. 2640.................. Flint, MI; Genesee, MI............. 1.1171 2650.................. Florence, AL; Colbert, AL; 0.7551 Lauderdale, AL. 2655.................. Florence, SC; Florence, SC......... 0.8711 2670.................. Fort Collins-Loveland, CO; Larimer, 1.0248 CO. 2680.................. Ft. Lauderdale, FL; Broward, FL.... 1.0448 2700.................. Fort Myers-Cape Coral, FL; Lee, FL. 0.8788 2710.................. Fort Pierce-Port St. Lucie, FL; 1.0257 Martin, FL; St. Lucie, FL. 2720.................. Fort Smith, AR-OK; Crawford, AR; 0.7769 Sebastian, AR; Sequoyah, OK. 2750.................. Fort Walton Beach, FL; Okaloosa, FL 0.8765 2760.................. Fort Wayne, IN; Adams, IN; Allen, 0.8901 IN; DeKalb, IN; Huntington, IN; Wells, IN; Whitley, IN. [[Page 15730]] 2800.................. Forth Worth-Arlington, TX; Hood, 0.9979 TX; Johnson, TX; Parker, TX; Tarrant, TX. 2840.................. Fresno, CA; Fresno, CA; Madera, CA. 1.0607 2880.................. Gadsden, AL; Etowah, AL............ 0.8815 2900.................. Gainesville, FL; Alachua, FL....... 0.9616 2920.................. Galveston-Texas City, TX; 1.0564 Galveston, TX. 2960.................. Gary, IN; Lake, IN; Porter, IN..... 0.9633 2975.................. Glens Falls, NY; Warren, NY; 0.8386 Washington, NY. 2980.................. Goldsboro, NC; Wayne, NC........... 0.8443 2985.................. Grand Forks, ND-MN; Polk, MN; Grand 0.8745 Forks, ND. 2995.................. Grand Junction, CO; Mesa, CO....... 0.9090 3000.................. Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI; 1.0147 Allegan, MI; Kent, MI; Muskegon, MI; Ottawa, MI. 3040.................. Great Falls, MT; Cascade, MT....... 0.8803 3060.................. Greeley, CO; Weld, CO.............. 1.0097 3080.................. Green Bay, WI; Brown, WI........... 0.9097 3120.................. Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High 0.9351 Point, NC; Alamance, NC; Davidson, NC; Davie, NC; Forsyth, NC Guilford, NC; Randolph, NC; Stokes, NC; Yadkin, NC. 3150.................. Greenville, NC; Pitt, NC........... 0.9064 3160.................. Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, 0.9059 SC; Anderson, SC; Cherokee, SC; Greenville, SC; Pickens, SC; Spartanburg, SC. 3180.................. Hagerstown, MD; Washington, MD..... 0.9681 3200.................. Hamilton-Middletown, OH; Butler, OH 0.8767 3240.................. Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle, PA; 1.0187 Cumberland, PA; Dauphin, PA; Lebanon, PA; Perry, PA. 3283.................. Hartford, CT; Hartford, CT; 1.2562 Litchfield, CT; Middlesex, CT; Tolland, CT. 3285.................. Hattiesburg, MS; Forrest, MS; 0.7192 Lamar, MS. 3290.................. Hickory-Morganton-Lenoir, NC; 0.8686 Alexander, NC; Burke, NC; Caldwell, NC; Catawba, NC. 3320.................. Honolulu, HI; Honolulu, HI......... 1.1816 3350.................. Houma, LA; Lafourche, LA; 0.7854 Terrebonne, LA. 3360.................. Houston, TX; Chambers, TX; Fort 0.9855 Bend, TX; Harris, TX; Liberty, TX; Montgomery, TX; Waller, TX. 3400.................. Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH; Boyd, 0.9160 KY; Carter, KY; Greenup, KY; Lawrence, OH; Cabell, WV; Wayne, WV. 3440.................. Huntsville, AL; Limestone, AL; 0.8485 Madison, AL. 3480.................. Indianapolis, IN; Boone, IN; 0.9848 Hamilton, IN; Hancock, IN; Hendricks, IN; Johnson, IN; Madison, IN; Marion, IN; Morgan, IN; Shelby, IN. 3500.................. Iowa City, IA; Johnson, IA......... 0.9413 3520.................. Jackson, MI; Jackson, MI........... 0.9052 3560.................. Jackson, MS; Hinds, MS; Madison, 0.7760 MS; Rankin, MS. 3580.................. Jackson, TN; Madison, TN; Chester, 0.8522 TN. 3600.................. Jacksonville, FL; Clay, FL; Duval, 0.8969 FL; Nassau, FL; St. Johns, FL. 3605.................. Jacksonville, NC; Onslow, NC....... 0.6973 3610.................. Jamestown, NY; Chautaqua, NY....... 0.7552 3620.................. Janesville-Beloit, WI; Rock, WI.... 0.8824 3640.................. Jersey City, NJ; Hudson, NJ........ 1.1412 3660.................. Johnson City-Kingsport-Bristol, TN- 0.9114 VA; Carter, TN; Hawkins, TN; Sullivan, TN; Unicoi, TN; Washington, TN; Bristol City, VA; Scott, VA; Washington, VA. 3680.................. Johnstown, PA; Cambria, PA; 0.8378 Somerset, PA. 3700.................. Jonesboro, AR; Craighead, AR....... 0.7443 3710.................. Joplin, MO; Jasper, MO; Newton, MO. 0.7510 3720.................. Kalamazoo-Battlecreek, MI; Calhoun, 1.0668 MI; Kalamazoo, MI; Van Buren, MI. 3740.................. Kankakee, IL; Kankakee, IL......... 0.8653 3760.................. Kansas City, KS-MO; Johnson, KS; 0.9564 Leavenworth, KS; Miami, KS; Wyandotte, KS; Cass, MO; Clay, MO; Clinton, MO; Jackson, MO; Lafayette, MO; Platte, MO; Ray, MO. 3800.................. Kenosha, WI; Kenosha, WI........... 0.9196 3810.................. Killeen-Temple, TX; Bell, TX; 1.0252 Coryell, TX. 3840.................. Knoxville, TN; Anderson, TN; 0.8831 Blount, TN; Knox, TN; Loudon, TN; Sevier, TN; Union, TN. 3850.................. Kokomo, IN; Howard, IN; Tipton, IN. 0.8416 3870.................. La Crosse, WI-MN; Houston, MN; La 0.8749 Crosse, WI. 3880.................. Lafayette, LA; Acadia, LA; 0.8206 Lafayette, LA; St. Landry, LA; St. Martin, LA. 3920.................. Lafayette, IN; Clinton, IN; 0.9174 Tippecanoe, IN. 3960.................. Lake Charles, LA; Calcasieu, LA.... 0.7776 3980.................. Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL; Polk, FL 0.8806 4000.................. Lancaster, PA; Lancaster, PA....... 0.9481 4040.................. Lansing-East Lansing, MI; Clinton, 1.0088 MI; Eaton, MI; Ingham, MI. 4080.................. Laredo, TX; Webb, TX............... 0.7325 4100.................. Las Cruces, NM; Dona Ana, NM....... 0.8646 4120.................. Las Vegas, NV-AZ; Mohave, AZ; 1.0592 Clark, NV; Nye, NV. 4150.................. Lawrence, KS; Douglas, KS.......... 0.8608 4200.................. Lawton, OK; Comanche, OK........... 0.9045 4243.................. Lewiston-Auburn, ME; Androscoggin, 0.9536 ME. 4280.................. Lexington, KY; Bourbon, KY; Clark, 0.8390 KY; Fayette, KY; Jessamine, KY; Madison, KY; Scott, KY; Woodford, KY. 4320.................. Lima, OH; Allen, OH; Auglaize, OH.. 0.9185 4360.................. Lincoln, NE; Lancaster, NE......... 0.9231 4400.................. Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR; 0.8490 Faulkner, AR; Lonoke, AR; Pulaski, AR; Saline, AR. 4420.................. Longview-Marshall, TX; Gregg, TX; 0.8613 Harrison, TX; Upshur, TX. [[Page 15731]] 4480.................. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA; Los 1.2232 Angeles, CA. 4520.................. Louisville, KY-IN; Clark, IN; 0.9507 Floyd, IN; Harrison, IN; Scott, IN; Bullitt, KY; Jefferson, KY; Oldham, KY. 4600.................. Lubbock, TX; Lubbock, TX........... 0.8400 4640.................. Lynchburg, VA; Amherst, VA; 0.8228 Bedford, VA; Bedford City, VA; Campbell, VA; Lynchburg City, VA. 4680.................. Macon, GA; Bibb, GA; Houston, GA; 0.9227 Jones, GA; Peach, GA; Twiggs, GA. 4720.................. Madison, WI; Dane, WI.............. 1.0055 4800.................. Mansfield, OH; Crawford, OH; 0.8639 Richland, OH. 4840.................. Mayaguez, PR; Anasco, PR; Cabo 0.4475 Rojo, PR; Hormigueros, PR; Mayaguez, PR; Sabana Grande, PR; San German, PR. 4880.................. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX; 0.8371 Hidalgo, TX. 4890.................. Medford-Ashland, OR; Jackson, OR... 1.0354 4900.................. Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL; 0.8819 Brevard, Fl. 4920.................. Memphis, TN-AR-MS; Crittenden, AR; 0.8589 DeSoto, MS; Fayette, TN; Shelby, TN; Tipton, TN. 4940.................. Merced, CA; Merced, CA............. 1.0947 5000.................. Miami, FL; Dade, FL................ 0.9859 5015.................. Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ; 1.1059 Hunterdon, NJ; Middlesex, NJ; Somerset, NJ. 5080.................. Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI; Milwaukee, 0.9819 WI; Ozaukee, WI; Washington, WI; Waukesha, WI. 5120.................. Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI; Anoka, 1.0733 MN; Carver, MN; Chisago, MN; Dakota, MN; Hennepin, MN; Isanti, MN; Ramsey, MN; Scott, MN; Sherburne, MN; Washington, MN; Wright, MN; Pierce, WI; St. Croix, WI. 5160.................. Mobile, AL; Baldwin, AL; Mobile, AL 0.8455 5170.................. Modesto, CA; Stanislaus, CA........ 1.0794 5190.................. Monmouth-Ocean, NJ; Monmouth, NJ; 1.0934 Ocean, NJ. 5200.................. Monroe, LA; Ouachita, LA........... 0.8414 5240.................. Montgomery, AL; Autauga, AL; 0.7671 Elmore, AL; Montgomery, AL. 5280.................. Muncie, IN; Delaware, IN........... 0.9173 5330.................. Myrtle Beach, SC; Horry, SC........ 0.8072 5345.................. Naples, FL; Collier, FL............ 1.0109 5360.................. Nashville, TN; Cheatham, TN; 0.9182 Davidson, TN; Dickson, TN; Robertson, TN; Rutherford TN; Sumner, TN; Williamson, TN; Wilson, TN. 5380.................. Nassau-Suffolk, NY; Nassau, NY; 1.3807 Suffolk, NY. 5483.................. New Haven-Bridgeport-Stamford- 1.2618 Danbury-Waterbury, CT; Fairfield, CT; New Haven, CT. 5523.................. New London-Norwich, CT; New London, 1.2013 CT. 5560.................. New Orleans, LA; Jefferson, LA; 0.9566 Orleans, LA; Plaquemines, LA; St. Bernard, LA; St. Charles, LA; St. James, LA; St. John Baptist, LA; St. Tammany, LA. 5600.................. New York, NY; Bronx, NY; Kings, NY; 1.4449 New York, NY; Putnam, NY; Queens, NY; Richmond, NY; Rockland, NY; Westchester, NY. 5640.................. Newark, NJ; Essex, NJ; Morris, NJ; 1.1980 Sussex, NJ; Union, NJ; Warren, NJ. 5660.................. Newburgh, NY-PA; Orange, NY; Pike, 1.1283 PA. 5720.................. Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newport 0.8316 News, VA-NC; Currituck, NC; Chesapeake City, VA; Gloucester, VA; Hampton City, VA; Isle of Wight, VA; James City, VA; Mathews, VA; Newport News City, VA; Norfolk City, VA; Poquoson City, VA; Portsmouth City, VA; Suffolk City, VA; Virginia Beach City VA; Williamsburg City, VA; York, VA. 5775.................. Oakland, CA; Alameda, CA; Contra 1.5068 Costa, CA. 5790.................. Ocala, FL; Marion, FL.............. 0.9032 5800.................. Odessa-Midland, TX; Ector, TX; 0.8660 Midland, TX. 5880.................. Oklahoma City, OK; Canadian, OK; 0.8481 Cleveland, OK; Logan, OK; McClain, OK; Oklahoma, OK; Pottawatomie, OK. 5910.................. Olympia, WA; Thurston, WA.......... 1.0901 5920.................. Omaha, NE-IA; Pottawattamie, IA; 0.9421 Cass, NE; Douglas, NE; Sarpy, NE; Washington, NE. 5945.................. Orange County, CA; Orange, CA...... 1.1605 5960.................. Orlando, FL; Lake, FL; Orange, FL; 0.9397 Osceola, FL; Seminole, FL. 5990.................. Owensboro, KY; Daviess, KY......... 0.7480 6015.................. Panama City, FL; Bay, FL........... 0.8337 6020.................. Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH; 0.8046 Washington, OH; Wood, WV. 6080.................. Pensacola, FL; Escambia, FL; Santa 0.8193 Rosa, FL. 6120.................. Peoria-Pekin, IL; Peoria, IL; 0.8571 Tazewell, IL; Woodford, IL. 6160.................. Philadelphia, PA-NJ; Burlington, 1.1398 NJ; Camden, NJ; Gloucester, NJ Salem, NJ; Bucks, PA; Chester, PA; Delaware, PA; Montgomery, PA; Philadelphia, PA. 6200.................. Phoenix-Mesa, AZ; Maricopa, AZ; 0.9606 Pinal, AZ. 6240.................. Pine Bluff, AR; Jefferson, AR...... 0.7826 6280.................. Pittsburgh, PA; Allegheny, PA; 0.9725 Beaver, PA; Butler, PA; Fayette, PA; Washington, PA; Westmoreland, PA. 6323.................. Pittsfield, MA; Berkshire, MA...... 1.0960 6340.................. Pocatelo, ID; Bannock ID........... 0.9586 6360.................. Ponce, PR; Guayanilla, PR; Juana 0.4589 Diaz, PR; Penuelas, PR; Ponce, PR; Villalba, PR; Yauco, PR. 6403.................. Portland, ME; Cumberland, ME; 0.9627 Sagadahoc, ME; York, ME. 6440.................. Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA; 1.1344 Clackamas, OR; Columbia, OR; Multnomah, OR; Washington, OR; Yamhill, OR; Clark, WA. 6483.................. Providence-Warwick-Pawtucket, RI; 1.1049 Bristol, RI; Kent, RI; Newport, RI; Providence, RI; Washington, RI; Statewide, RI. 6520.................. Provo-Orem, UT; Utah, UT........... 1.0073 6560.................. Pueblo, CO; Pueblo, CO............. 0.8450 6580.................. Punta Gorda, FL; Charlotte, FL..... 0.8725 6600.................. Racine, WI; Racine, WI............. 0.8934 [[Page 15732]] 6640.................. Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC; 0.9818 Chatham, NC; Durham, NC; Franklin, NC; Johnston, NC; Orange, NC; Wake, NC. 6660.................. Rapid City, SD; Pennington, SD..... 0.8345 6680.................. Reading, PA; Berks, PA............. 0.9516 6690.................. Redding, CA; Shasta, CA............ 1.1790 6720.................. Reno, NV; Washoe, NV............... 1.0768 6740.................. Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA; 0.9918 Benton, WA; Franklin, WA. 6760.................. Richmond-Petersburg, VA; Charles 0.9152 City County, VA; Chesterfield, VA; Colonial Heights City, VA; Dinwiddie, VA; Goochland, VA; Hanover, VA; Henrico, VA; Hopewell City, VA; New Kent, VA; Petersburg City, VA; Powhatan, VA; Prince George, VA; Richmond City, VA. 6780.................. Riverside-San Bernardino, CA; 1.1307 Riverside, CA; San Bernardino, CA. 6800.................. Roanoke, VA; Botetourt, VA; 0.8402 Roanoke, VA; Roanoke City, VA; Salem City, VA. 6820.................. Rochester, MN; Olmsted, MN......... 1.0502 6840.................. Rochester, NY; Genesee, NY; 0.9524 Livingston, NY; Monroe, NY; Ontario, NY; Orleans, NY; Wayne, NY. 6880.................. Rockford, IL; Boone, IL; Ogle, IL; 0.9081 Winnebago, IL. 6895.................. Rocky Mount, NC; Edgecombe, NC; 0.9029 Nash, NC. 6920.................. Sacramento, CA; El Dorado, CA; 1.2202 Placer, CA; Sacramento, CA. 6960.................. Saginaw-Bay City-Midland, MI; Bay, 0.9564 MI; Midland, MI; Saginaw, MI. 6980.................. St. Cloud, MN; Benton, MN; Stearns, 0.9544 MN. 7000.................. St. Joseph, MO; Andrews, MO; 0.8366 Buchanan, MO. 7040.................. St. Louis, MO-IL; Clinton, IL; 0.9130 Jersey, IL; Madison, IL; Monroe, IL; St. Clair, IL; Franklin, MO; Jefferson, MO; Lincoln, MO; St. Charles, MO; St. Louis, MO; St. Louis City, MO; Warren, MO. 7080.................. Salem, OR; Marion, OR; Polk, OR.... 0.9935 7120.................. Salinas, CA; Monterey, CA.......... 1.4513 7160.................. Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT; Davis, 0.9857 UT; Salt Lake, UT; Weber, UT. 7200.................. San Angelo, TX; Tom Green, TX...... 0.7780 7240.................. San Antonio, TX; Bexar, TX; Comal, 0.8499 TX; Guadalupe, TX; Wilson, TX. 7320.................. San Diego, CA; San Diego, CA....... 1.2193 7360.................. San Francisco, CA; Marin, CA; San 1.4180 Francisco, CA; San Mateo, CA. 7400.................. San Jose, CA; Santa Clara, CA...... 1.4332 7440.................. San Juan-Bayamon, PR; Aguas Buenas, 0.4625 PR; Barceloneta, PR; Bayamon, PR; Canovanas, PR; Carolina, PR; Catano, PR; Ceiba, PR; Comerio, PR; Corozal, PR; Dorado, PR; Fajardo, PR; Florida, PR; Guaynabo, PR; Humacao, PR; Juncos, PR; Los Piedras, PR; Loiza, PR; Luguillo, PR; Manati, PR; Morovis, PR; Naguabo, PR; Naranjito, PR; Rio Grande, PR; San Juan, PR; Toa Alta, PR; Toa Baja, PR; Trujillo Alto, PR; Vega Alta, PR; Vega Baja, PR; Yabucoa, PR. 7460.................. San Luis Obispo-Atascadero-Paso 1.1374 Robles, CA; San Luis Obispo, CA. 7480.................. Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Lompoc, 1.0688 CA; Santa Barbara, CA. 7485.................. Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA; Santa 1.4187 Cruz, CA. 7490.................. Santa Fe, NM; Los Alamos, NM; Santa 1.0332 Fe, NM. 7500.................. Santa Rosa, CA; Sonoma, CA......... 1.2815 7510.................. Sarasota-Bradenton, FL; Manatee, 0.9757 FL; Sarasota, FL. 7520.................. Savannah, GA; Bryan, GA; Chatham, 0.8638 GA; Effingham, GA. 7560.................. Scranton--Wilkes-Barre--Hazleton, 0.8539 PA; Columbia, PA; Lackawanna, PA; Luzerne, PA; Wyoming, PA. 7600.................. Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA; 1.1339 Island, WA; King, WA; Snohomish, WA. 7610.................. Sharon, PA; Mercer, PA............. 0.8783 7620.................. Sheboygan, WI; Sheboygan, WI....... 0.7862 7640.................. Sherman-Denison, TX; Grayson, TX... 0.8499 7680.................. Shreveport-Bossier City, LA; 0.9381 Bossier, LA; Caddo, LA; Webster, LA. 7720.................. Sioux City, IA-NE; Woodbury, IA; 0.8031 Dakota, NE. 7760.................. Sioux Falls, SD; Lincoln, SD; 0.8712 Minnehaha, SD. 7800.................. South Bend, IN; St. Joseph, IN..... 0.9868 7840.................. Spokane, WA; Spokane, WA........... 1.0486 7880.................. Springfield, IL; Menard, IL; 0.8713 Sangamon, IL. 7920.................. Springfield, MO; Christian, MO; 0.7989 Greene, MO; Webster, MO. 8003.................. Springfield, MA; Hampden, MA; 1.0740 Hampshire, MA. 8050.................. State College, PA; Centre, PA...... 0.9635 8080.................. Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV; 0.8645 Jefferson, OH; Brooke, WV; Hancock, WV. 8120.................. Stockton-Lodi, CA; San Joaquin, CA. 1.1496 8140.................. Sumter, SC; Sumter, SC............. 0.7842 8160.................. Syracuse, NY; Cayuga, NY; Madison, 0.9464 NY; Onondaga, NY; Oswego, NY. 8200.................. Tacoma, WA; Pierce, WA............. 1.1016 8240.................. Tallahassee, FL; Gadsden, FL; Leon, 0.8832 FL. 8280.................. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, 0.9103 FL; Hernando, FL; Hillsborough, FL; Pasco, FL; Pinellas, FL. 8320.................. Terre Haute, IN; Clay, IN; 0.8614 Vermillion, IN; Vigo, IN. 8360.................. Texarkana, AR-Texarkana, TX; 0.8664 Miller, AR; Bowie, TX. 8400.................. Toledo, OH; Fulton, OH; Lucas, OH; 1.0390 Wood, OH. 8440.................. Topeka, KS; Shawnee, KS............ 0.9438 8480.................. Trenton, NJ; Mercer, NJ............ 1.0380 8520.................. Tucson, AZ; Pima, AZ............... 0.9180 8560.................. Tulsa, OK; Creek, OK; Osage, OK; 0.8074 Rogers, OK; Tulsa, OK; Wagoner, OK. 8600.................. Tuscaloosa, AL; Tuscaloosa, AL..... 0.8187 8640.................. Tyler, TX; Smith, TX............... 0.9567 [[Page 15733]] 8680.................. Utica-Rome, NY; Herkimer, NY; 0.8398 Oneida, NY. 8720.................. Vallejo-Fairfield-Napa, CA; Napa, 1.3754 CA; Solano, CA. 8735.................. Ventura, CA; Ventura, CA........... 1.0946 8750.................. Victoria, TX; Victoria, TX......... 0.8474 8760.................. Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ; 1.0110 Cumberland, NJ. 8780.................. Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA; 0.9924 Tulare, CA. 8800.................. Waco, TX; McLennan, TX............. 0.7696 8840.................. Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV; District 1.0911 of Columbia, DC; Calvert, MD; Charles, MD; Frederick, MD; Montgomery, MD; Prince Georges, MD; Alexandria City, VA; Arlington, VA; Clarke, VA; Culpepper, VA; Fairfax, VA; Fairfax City, VA; Falls Church City, VA; Fauquier, VA; Fredericksburg City, VA; King George, VA; Loudoun, VA; Manassas City, VA; Manassas Park City, VA; Prince William, VA; Spotsylvania, VA; Stafford, VA; Warren, VA; Berkeley, WV; Jefferson, WV. 8920.................. Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA; Black 0.8640 Hawk, IA. 8940.................. Wausau, WI; Marathon, WI........... 1.0545 8960.................. West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL; 1.0372 Palm Beach, FL. 9000.................. Wheeling, OH-WV; Belmont, OH; 0.7707 Marshall, WV; Ohio, WV. 9040.................. Wichita, KS; Butler, KS; Harvey, 0.9403 KS; Sedgwick, KS. 9080.................. Wichita Falls, TX; Archer, TX; 0.7646 Wichita, TX. 9140.................. Williamsport, PA; Lycoming, PA..... 0.8548 9160.................. Wilmington-Newark, DE-MD; New 1.1538 Castle, DE; Cecil, MD. 9200.................. Wilmington, NC; New Hanover, NC; 0.9322 Brunswick, NC. 9260.................. Yakima, WA; Yakima, WA............. 1.0102 9270.................. Yolo, CA; Yolo, CA................. 1.1431 9280.................. York, PA; York, PA................. 0.9415 9320.................. Youngstown-Warren, OH; Columbiana, 0.9937 OH; Mahoning, OH; Trumbull, OH. 9340.................. Yuba City, CA; Sutter, CA; Yuba, CA 1.0324 9360.................. Yuma, AZ; Yuma, AZ................. 0.9732 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Table 4b.--Wage Index for Rural Areas ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wage Nonurban area Index ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Alabama...................................................... 0.7260 Alaska....................................................... 1.2302 Arizona...................................................... 0.7989 Arkansas..................................................... 0.6995 California................................................... 0.9977 Colorado..................................................... 0.8129 Connecticut.................................................. 1.2617 Delaware..................................................... 0.8925 Florida...................................................... 0.8838 Georgia...................................................... 0.7761 Hawaii....................................................... 1.0229 Idaho........................................................ 0.8221 Illinois..................................................... 0.7644 Indiana...................................................... 0.8161 Iowa......................................................... 0.7391 Kansas....................................................... 0.7203 Kentucky..................................................... 0.7772 Louisiana.................................................... 0.7383 Maine........................................................ 0.8468 Maryland..................................................... 0.8617 Massachusetts................................................ 1.0718 Michigan..................................................... 0.8923 Minnesota.................................................... 0.8179 Mississippi.................................................. 0.6911 Missouri..................................................... 0.7205 Montana...................................................... 0.8302 Nebraska..................................................... 0.7401 Nevada....................................................... 0.8914 New Hampshire................................................ 0.9717 New Jersey \1\............................................... New Mexico................................................... 0.8070 New York..................................................... 0.8401 North Carolina............................................... 0.7937 North Dakota................................................. 0.7360 Ohio......................................................... 0.8434 Oklahoma..................................................... 0.7072 Oregon....................................................... 0.9975 Pennsylvania................................................. 0.8421 Puerto Rico.................................................. 0.3939 Rhode Island \1\............................................. South Carolina............................................... 0.7921 South Dakota................................................. 0.6983 Tennessee.................................................... 0.7353 Texas........................................................ 0.7404 Utah......................................................... 0.8926 Vermont...................................................... 0.9314 Virginia..................................................... 0.7782 Washington................................................... 1.0221 West Virginia................................................ 0.7938 Wisconsin.................................................... 0.8471 Wyoming...................................................... 0.8247 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \1\ All counties within the State are classified urban. Table 5.--Cost Reporting Year--Adjustment Factor \1\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The If the HHA cost reporting period begins adjustment factor is ------------------------------------------------------------------------ November 1, 1997............................................ 1.00260 December 1, 1997............................................ 1.00521 January 1, 1998............................................. 1.00781 February 1, 1998............................................ 1.01042 March 1, 1998............................................... 1.01302 April 1, 1998............................................... 1.01563 May 1, 1998................................................. 1.01823 June 1, 1998................................................ 1.02086 July 1, 1998................................................ 1.02353 August 1, 1998.............................................. 1.02626 September 1, 1998........................................... 1.02901 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \1\ Based on compounded projected market basket inflation rates. Source: The Home Health Agency Input Price Index, produced by HCFA for the period between 1983:1 and 2008:4. The forecasts are from Standard and Poor's DRI 3rd QTR 1997: @USSIM/TREND25YR0897@CISSIM/Control973 forecast exercise which has historical data through 1997:2. Table 6.--Monthly Index Levels for Calculating Inflation Factors to be Applied to Home Health Agency ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Index Per-beneficiary limitations--Month level ------------------------------------------------------------------------ October 1992................................................. .98566 November 1992................................................ .98800 December 1992................................................ .99099 January 1993................................................. .99399 February 1993................................................ .99700 March 1993................................................... .99933 April 1993................................................... 1.00166 May 1993..................................................... 1.00400 June 1993.................................................... 1.00666 July 1993.................................................... 1.00933 August 1993.................................................. 1.01200 September 1993............................................... 1.01400 October 1993................................................. 1.01600 November 1993................................................ 1.01800 December 1993................................................ 1.02099 January 1994................................................. 1.02399 [[Page 15734]] February 1994................................................ 1.02700 March 1994................................................... 1.02866 April 1994................................................... 1.03033 May 1994..................................................... 1.03200 June 1994.................................................... 1.03499 July 1994.................................................... 1.03499 August 1994.................................................. 1.03499 September 1994............................................... 1.03499 October 1994................................................. 1.03499 November 1994................................................ 1.03499 December 1994................................................ 1.03499 January 1995................................................. 1.03499 February 1995................................................ 1.03499 March 1995................................................... 1.03499 April 1995................................................... 1.03499 May 1995..................................................... 1.03499 June 1995.................................................... 1.03499 July 1995.................................................... 1.03499 August 1995.................................................. 1.03499 September 1995............................................... 1.03499 October 1995................................................. 1.03499 November 1995................................................ 1.03499 December 1995................................................ 1.03499 January 1996................................................. 1.03499 February 1996................................................ 1.03499 March 1996................................................... 1.03499 April 1996................................................... 1.03499 May 1996..................................................... 1.03499 June 1996.................................................... 1.03499 July 1996.................................................... 1.03720 August 1996.................................................. 1.03941 September 1996............................................... 1.04162 October 1996................................................. 1.04383 November 1996................................................ 1.04604 December 1996................................................ 1.04856 January 1997................................................. 1.05108 February 1997................................................ 1.05361 March 1997................................................... 1.05582 April 1997................................................... 1.05803 May 1997..................................................... 1.06024 June 1997.................................................... 1.06276 July 1997.................................................... 1.06528 August 1997.................................................. 1.06781 September 1997............................................... 1.07064 October 1997................................................. 1.07348 November 1997................................................ 1.07633 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ XI. Regulatory Impact Statement A. Introduction HCFA has examined the impacts of this final rule with comment period as required by Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (Pub. L. 96-354), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects; distributive impacts; and equity). The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief for small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, States and individuals are not considered small entities. However, most providers, physicians, and health care suppliers are small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of 5 million or less annually. Approximately 25 percent of HHAs are identified as Visiting Nurse Associations, combined in government and voluntary, and official health agency, and therefore, are considered small entities. Since the aggregate per-beneficiary limitation will reduce payments by approximately nine percent, we anticipate this rule will have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. We have examined the options for lessening the burden on small entities, however, the statute does not allow for any exceptions to the aggregate per-beneficiary limitation based on size of entity. Therefore, we are unable to provide any regulatory relief for small entities. Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requires agencies to prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before proposing any rule that may result in an annual expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by private sector, of $100 million (adjusted annually for inflation). We believe that the costs associated with this final rule with comment fall below $100 million both in the governmental and private sectors. Therefore, we are not preparing an assessment. We estimate that the impact of this final rule with comment period will be to decrease payments to home health agencies by approximately $1.06 billion in Federal FY 1998 and $2.14 billion in FY 1999, compared to the payment that would have been made in Federal FY 1998 if BBA '97 had not been enacted. Therefore, this rule is a major rule as defined in Title 5, United States Code, section 804(2) and is a significant rule under Executive Order 12866. It is clear that the changes being made in this document will affect both a substantial number of small HHAs as well as other classes of HHAs, and the effects on some may be significant. Therefore, the discussion below, in combination with the rest of this final rule with comment period, constitutes a combined regulatory impact analysis and regulatory flexibility analysis. Nevertheless, in some markets new agency limits may be higher than the limit for older agencies as a result of the per-beneficiary limitation methodology required by the statute. B. Explanation of Aggregate Beneficiary Limit HHA limits are set forth at sections 1861(v)(1)(A) and 1861(v)(1)(L)of the Act. Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v), as added to the Act by section 4602 of BBA '97, requires the Secretary to establish an interim system of limits before the implementation of a prospective payment system for home health services. Payments by Medicare under this interim system of limits will be the lower of an HHA's actual reasonable allowable costs, per visit limits in the aggregate, or a per-beneficiary limit as described in sections 1861(v)(1)(L)(v)(I) and 1861(v)(1)(L)(vi)(I) of the Act. Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(v)(I) requires that the aggregate per- beneficiary annual limit be determined as follows: blend of 75 percent on 98 percent of the reasonable costs (including nonroutine medical supplies) for the agency's 12-month cost reporting period ending during Federal FY 1994, and 25 percent on 98 percent of the standardized regional average of such costs for the agency's census division for cost reporting periods ending during Federal FY 1994 (both updated by the home health market basket excluding any changes in the home health market basket with respect to cost reporting periods which began on or after July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996). The results will be multiplied by the agency's unduplicated census count of beneficiaries (entitled to benefits under Medicare) for the cost reporting period subject to the limit. As stated in section II.A. of this preamble, we determined the unduplicated census count as reported on the Medicare cost report by HHA providers was not reliable. As a result, we generated an unduplicated census count from our Standard Analytical File which is generated from our National Claims History File. In regards to the home health market basket, section 1861(v)(1)(L)(iv) was added to the Act by section 4601(a) of BBA '97, and requires the Secretary not to take into account any changes in the home health market basket with respect to cost reporting periods which began on or after July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996 in establishing the limitations for cost reporting periods beginning after September 30, 1997. In regards to the wage index, the appropriate census region per- beneficiary limitation will be the applicable census region where the beneficiary received services from the HHA and the applicable wage index will be the geographic area where the beneficiary received home health services. [[Page 15735]] For new providers and providers without a 12-month cost reporting period ending in Federal FY year 1994, the per-beneficiary limitation will be equal to the median of these limits applied to other HHAs as determined in this document. For Medicare beneficiaries using more than one HHA, the per- beneficiary limitation will be prorated among the agencies. C. Effect on Home Health Agencies The following quantitative analysis presents the projected effects of the statutory changes effective for Federal FY 1998. As discussed below, the impact of this final rule with comment period will decrease payments to HHAs by approximately $1.06 billion in Federal FY 1998 compared to payment that would have been made in Federal FY 1998 if BBA '97 had not been enacted. This is a reduction of approximately nine percent. This final rule with comment period is necessary to implement the provisions of section 1861(v)(1)(L) of the Act, as amended by BBA '97. The settled cost report data that we are using have been adjusted by the most recent market basket factors, excluding market basket increases for cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 1994 and before July 1, 1996, to reflect the expected cost increases occurring between the cost reporting periods for the data contained in the database and September 30, 1998. The cost limits for HHAs are statutorily driven and the impact of decreases in payments to HHAs have been reflected in the current law baseline of the mid-session review of the President's Federal FY 98 budget. We are unable to identify the effects of the changes to the cost limits on individual HHAs. However, Table 7 below illustrates the proportion of HHAs that are likely to be affected by the limits. This table is a model of our estimate of the effects of the aggregate per- beneficiary limit. The total number of HHAs in this table--6,414--is based on HHA cost reports with a Federal FY ending in 1994 and for new providers whose cost reports end on either December 31, 1994 or December 31, 1995. For both old and new providers, the length of the cost report is 12 months. This table takes into account the behaviors that we believe HHAs will engage in order to reduce the adverse effects of section 4602 of BBA '97 on their allowable costs. We believe these behavioral offsets might include an increase in the number of low cost beneficiaries served, a general decrease in the number of visits provided, and earlier discharge of patients who are not eligible for Medicare home health benefits because they no longer need skilled services but have only chronic, custodial care needs. We believe that, on average, these behavioral offsets will result in a 65-percent reduction in the effects these limits might otherwise have on an individual HHA. Our projected savings of $1.06 billion in Federal FY 1998 and $2.14 billion in Federal FY 1999 are the savings that occur as a result of implementing section 4602 of the BBA including the behavioral offsets noted above. Column one of this table divides HHAs by a number of characteristics including their ownership, whether they are old or new agencies, whether they are located in an urban or rural area, and the census region they are located in. Column two shows the number of agencies that fall within each characteristic or group of characteristics, for example, there are 1,197 rural freestanding HHAs in our database. Column three shows the percent of HHAs within a group that are projected to exceed the aggregate per-beneficiary limit before the behavioral offsets are taken into account. Column four shows the average percent of costs over the limits for an agency in that cell, including behavioral offsets. Table 7.--HHA Limits Effective 10/1/97; Effects OF The Per-Beneficiary Limit ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Percent percent of Area Number of exceeding per- costs agencies beneficiary exceeding limit limit ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BY: AGENCY TYPE ALL AGENCIES................................................ 6414 57.9 9.3 FREESTANDING............................................ 4308 65.8 10.8 HOSPITAL BASED.......................................... 2106 41.8 6.2 OLD AGENCIES............................................ 5256 60.0 8.9 FREESTANDING........................................ 3245 71.3 10.4 HOSPITAL BASED...................................... 2011 41.8 6.1 NEW AGENCIES............................................ 1158 48.2 12.6 FREESTANDING........................................ 1063 48.8 12.8 HOSPITAL BASED...................................... 95 41.1 9.4 BY: GEOGRAPHIC AREA ALL URBAN................................................... 4137 62.3 9.5 FREESTANDING............................................ 3111 68.2 10.8 HOSPITAL BASED.......................................... 1026 44.3 6.2 OLD AGENCIES............................................ 3272 65.5 9.1 FREESTANDING........................................ 2292 74.6 10.5 HOSPITAL BASED...................................... 980 44.4 6.2 NEW AGENCIES............................................ 865 49.9 12.4 FREESTANDING........................................ 819 50.3 12.6 HOSPITAL BASED...................................... 46 43.5 9.4 ALL RURAL................................................... 2277 49.9 8.8 FREESTANDING............................................ 1197 59.5 10.6 HOSPITAL BASED.......................................... 1080 39.4 6.0 OLD AGENCIES............................................ 1984 51.0 8.3 FREESTANDING........................................ 953 63.5 10.1 HOSPITAL BASED...................................... 1031 39.4 5.9 NEW AGENCIES............................................ 293 43.0 13.3 FREESTANDING........................................ 244 43.9 13.6 HOSPITAL BASED...................................... 49 38.8 9.5 BY REGION: [[Page 15736]] OLD AGENCIES................................................ 5256 60.0 8.9 NEW ENGLAND............................................. 291 84.5 12.3 MIDDLE ATLANTIC......................................... 443 71.3 9.0 SOUTH ATLANTIC.......................................... 739 62.7 9.2 EAST NORTH CENTRAL...................................... 866 65.4 9.6 EAST SOUTH CENTRAL...................................... 431 58.2 8.7 WEST NORTH CENTRAL...................................... 728 52.9 8.8 WEST SOUTH CENTRAL...................................... 936 54.1 8.2 MOUNTAIN................................................ 354 48.3 7.0 PACIFIC................................................. 428 52.3 6.9 NEW AGENCIES................................................ 1158 48.2 12.6 NEW ENGLAND............................................. 44 90.9 15.6 MIDDLE ATLANTIC......................................... 51 35.3 4.7 SOUTH ATLANTIC.......................................... 44 40.9 7.1 EAST NORTH CENTRAL...................................... 151 23.2 4.4 EAST SOUTH CENTRAL...................................... 25 56.0 14.8 WEST NORTH CENTRAL...................................... 117 28.2 10.3 WEST SOUTH CENTRAL...................................... 484 60.3 16.6 MOUNTAIN................................................ 103 49.5 8.5 PACIFIC................................................. 138 41.3 10.4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D. Percent of Costs Exceeding Limit (Column Four) Results from this column indicate that the average percent of costs exceeding the aggregate per-beneficiary limit for an HHA in the ``all agencies'' cell is 9.3 percent after the behavioral offset. This should not be surprising since the intent of section 4602 of the BBA is to control the soaring expenditures of the Medicare home health benefit which have been driven largely by increased utilization. For the old agencies cell (HHAs that filed a 12-month cost report that ended during Federal FY 1994), the average percent of costs exceeding the aggregate per-beneficiary limit is 8.9 percent. For the new agencies cell (HHAs that did not have a 12-month cost reporting period ended in Federal FY 1994 or that entered the Medicare program after Federal FY 1994), the average percent of costs exceeding the aggregate per-beneficiary limit is 12.6 percent. Old agencies will not be affected as much as the new agencies, on average, because the new agencies have, in general, reported higher costs related to higher levels of utilization. Moreover, the statutory provision basing \3/4\ of old provider limits on their own cost experience would implicitly result in less of an impact than experienced by the new providers whose limits are based on a national median. For the urban areas HHA cell, the average percent of costs exceeding the aggregate per-beneficiary limit is 9.5 percent, while the rural areas HHA cell is 8.8 percent. For the old agency census division cells the average percent of costs exceeding the aggregate per- beneficiary limit ranges from a low of 6.9 percent in the Pacific census region to a high of 12.3 percent in the New England census region. The other census regions fall between 7.0 percent and 9.2 percent. The differences between census regions reflect the pattern of highly disparate costs that have been reported historically between geographic areas which cannot be explained by differences in patient characteristics but appear related to patterns of HHA practices. For the new agency census region cells the average percent of costs exceeding the aggregate per-beneficiary limit ranges from a low of 4.4 percent in the East North Central census region to a high of 16.6 percent in the West South Central census region. The other census regions fall between 4.7 percent and 15.6 percent. In general, newer agencies in census regions that have exceptionally high cost histories are more impacted by their being limited to the national median. Although there is considerable variation in these limits, we believe this is a natural reflection of the wide variation in payments that have been recognized under the present cost reimbursement system. Moreover, we believe the differing impacts of these limits is an inherent result of beginning to draw unexplained variation among providers closer to national norms which existed prior to the rapid increase in home health expenditures of the post '93-'94 period. Because this rule limits payments to HHAs to the lesser of actual cost, the per-visit limitations, or the aggregate per-beneficiary limitation, we have estimated the combined impact of these limitations. (We note, that these estimates differ from those published on January 2, 1998 in our per-visit limitation notice (63 FR 89) because of the interaction of the two limitations, which we could not calculate until we developed the database used in this rule.) We estimate that in both 1998 and 1999, 35 percent of the HHAs will be limited by the per-visit limitation and 58 percent of the HHAs will be limited by the per-beneficiary limitation. The estimated combined savings for 1998, however, will be $1.4 billion, of which $370 million is attributable to the per-visit limitation, and $1.06 billion is attributable to the per-beneficiary limitation. The estimated combined savings for 1999 will be $2.9 billion, of which $740 million is attributable to the per-visit limitation, and $2.14 billion is attributable to the per-beneficiary limitation. For FY 1998, 15 percent of the Medicare savings are attributable to payments to managed care plans and for FY 1999, 20 percent of the savings will be from payments to managed care plans. The per-beneficiary limitation may impact some State Medicaid programs. However, because of variation in State Medicaid policies and service delivery systems, it is impossible to predict which States will be affected or the magnitude of the impact, if any. [[Page 15737]] Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, agencies are required to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register and solicit public comments before a collection of information requirement is submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review and approval. We do not believe this final rule has any collection of information issues associated with it. Any collection of information requirements would be associated with modifications to the Home Health Agency Cost Report (HCFA Form 1728-94). These modifications are being handled in a separate collection of information. In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this notice was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. XII. Other Required Information A. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking We ordinarily publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register to provide a period for public comment before the provisions of the rule take effect. However, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. (United States Code) 553(b)(B) we may waive a notice of proposed rulemaking if we find good cause that notice and comment are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. For good cause we find that it was impracticable to undertake notice and comment procedures between the date of enactment of the BBA '97 (August 5, 1997) and the statutory deadline for establishing the per- beneficiary limitations (April 1, 1998). The BBA '97 required the per- beneficiary calculations be based on data obtained from HHA Medicare cost reports for cost reporting periods ending during the Federal FY '94. To comply with this statutory requirement we had to perform a special data collection from our fiscal intermediaries to obtain these cost report data. In addition, the BBA '97 required HCFA to use an unduplicated census count to calculate the aggregate per-beneficiary limitations. The primary source for this count was also the provider cost report for Federal FY 1994. Because the unduplicated census count on the provider cost report was determined to be unreliable, it was necessary to generate an unduplicated census count from the National Claims History Standard Analytical File. In addition, we preformed a special data collection because a significant number of FY 1994 cost reports were not available. The internal calculation of unduplicated beneficiary counts from 17 million records was a time-consuming effort that was necessary to generate the information needed to calculate these limitations. These counts could not be performed prior to the completion of the special data collection effort and verification of the existing database. An extraordinary amount of resources was necessary to construct an entirely new database to compute the new per- beneficiary limitations. Significant programming efforts were necessary to match the individual beneficiaries to their applicable MSA areas. Specific matching efforts were also necessary to eliminate duplicate beneficiaries. These beneficiaries were then matched to the provider cost reports for each agency in the database. These lengthy procedures could not be completed before February 1, 1998. Therefore, we believe in this instance, it was impracticable to publish a proposed rule and for good cause waive publication of a proposed regulation. We are however, providing a 60-day period for public comment. B. Waiver of 30-Day Delay in Effective Date Generally, the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(d), requires us to provide a 30-day delay before effectuation of a final rule, unless we find good cause to dispense with that delay. To the extent this requirement applies to this final rule, for good cause we waive the 30-day delay in effective date. As noted previously, these per-beneficiary limitations are effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997. Section 1861(v)(1)(L)(vii) of the Act requires the Secretary to establish these per-beneficiary limitations by April 1, 1998 and requires that they apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997. That statutory requirement is clear. A 30-day delay in implementing these per-beneficiary limitations is impracticable. Therefore, we find that it is impracticable to provide for a 30-day delay in effective date and for good cause we waive the delay in effective date. C. Effect of the Contract with America Advancement Act, Pub. L. 104-121 Normally, under 5 U.S.C. 801, as added by section 251 of Pub. L. 104-121, the effective date of a major rule is delayed 60 days for Congressional review. This has been determined to be a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2). However, as indicated in section XI.A. of the preamble to this final rule, for good cause, we find that prior notice and comment procedures are impracticable. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 808(2), a major rule shall take effect at such time as the Federal agency promulgating the rule determines if for good cause it finds that notice and public procedure is impracticable. Accordingly, under the exemption provided in 5 U.S.C. 808(2), these per-beneficiary limitations are effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1997. D. Public Comments Because of the large number of items of correspondence we normally receive on a rule with comment period, we are not able to acknowledge or respond to them individually. However, we will consider all comments concerning the provisions of this rule that we receive by the date and time specified in the Dates section of this rule, and we will respond to those comments in a subsequent document. List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 413 Health facilities, Kidney diseases, Medicare, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set out in the preamble, 42 CFR, chapter IV, subchapter B, part 413 is amended as set forth below. PART 413--PRINCIPLES OF REASONABLE COST REIMBURSEMENT; PAYMENT FOR END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE SERVICES; OPTIONAL PROSPECTIVELY DETERMINED PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES 1. The authority citation for part 413 is revised to read as follows: Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh). Sec. 413.30 [Amended] 2. In Sec. 413.30, the following amendments are made: a. In paragraph (a)(1), in the first sentence, the reference to ``section 1861 (v)(1)(A)'' is revised to read ``sections 1861(v)(1)(A) and (v)(1)(L)''. b. In paragraph (a)(2), in the last sentence, after ``may be calculated on a'' add ``per beneficiary,''. c. In paragraph (c), in the first sentence, revise ``A provider'' to read ``Except for the per-beneficiary limitation that applies to HHAs, a provider''. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773 Medicare--Hospital Insurance) Authority: Section 1861(v)(1)(L) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(v)(1)(L)); section 4207(d) of Pub. L. 101-508 (42 U.S.C. 1395x (note)). [[Page 15738]] Dated: March 15, 1998. Nancy-Ann Min DeParle, Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration. Dated: March 24, 1998. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary. [FR Doc. 98-8480 Filed 3-30-98; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4120-01-P