[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36873-36874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17986]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Skipping Cow Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Forset Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the proposed Skipping Cow Timber Sale. The timber
sale is located in the Tongass National Forest, Stikine Area, Wrangell
Ranger District, on Zarembo Island, within Value Comparison Units
(VCU's) 458 and 459. The Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan
(1997) provides the overall guidance (land use designations, goals,
objectives, management prescriptions, standards and guidelines) to
achieve the desired future condition for the area in which this project
is proposed. This Forest Plan allocates portions of the project area
into three management prescriptions: Timber Production, Modified
Landscape, and Scenic Viewshed.
The purpose and need for the project is to respond to the goals and
objectives identified by the Forest Plan for the timber and move
Skipping Cow Project Area toward the desired future condition. The
Forest Plan identified the following goals and objectives: (1) manage
the timber resource for production of saw timber and other wood
products from suitable timber lands made available for timber harvest,
on an even-flow, long-term sustained yield basis and in an economically
efficient manner (Forest Plan page 2-4); (2) seek to provide a timber
supply sufficient to meet the annual market demand for Tongass National
Forest timber, and the demand for the planning cycle (page 2-4); and
(3) maintain and
[[Page 36874]]
promote industrial wood production from suitable timber lands,
providing a continuous supply of wood to meet society's needs (page 3-
144). The Skipping Cow Timber Sale will be designed to produce desired
resource values, products, and conditions in ways that also sustain the
diversity and productivity of ecosystems (page 2-1).
The Skipping Cow Timber Sale is expected to provide a range of
volume to the timber industry from 20 to 30 million board feet. The
range of alternatives to be considered in the EIS will be determined
during analysis and reflect issues raised during scoping.
The Proposed Action provides for: (1) construction of approximately
15.5 miles of specified road and additional temporary road; and (2)
harvest between 900-1300 acres. The existing log transfer facility at
Deep Bay Harbor will be used to transfer volume to the water. A variety
of systems would be used for yarding, including helicopter, cable,
skyline and shovel yarding systems.
A number of public comments have been received on this project.
Based on comments from the public and other agencies during the
preliminary scoping effort, the following issues have been identified.
How will the design of the sale affect: harvest economics, access road
management, Wind ecology (large scale blowdown), and winter deer
habitat? These issues and other issues discovered during further
scoping will be used to design alternatives to the proposed action and
to identify the potential environmental effects of the proposed action
and alternatives.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of this project should be received
by August 24, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning the scope of this project should be sent
to Jerry Jordan, ID Team Leader, Wrangell Ranger District, Tongass
National Forest, Stikine Area; Attn: Skipping Cow EIS; P.O. Box 51,
Wrangell, Alaska, 99929, phone (907) 874-2323.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Public participation will be an integral component of the study
process and will be especially important at several points during the
analysis. The first is during the scoping process. The Forest Service
will be seeking information, comments, and assistance from Federal,
State, local agencies, individuals and organizations that may be
interested in, or affected by, the proposed activities. The scoping
process will include: (1) identification of significant issues: (2)
identification of issues to be analyzed in depth; and (3) elimination
of insignificant issues or those which have been covered by a previous
environmental review. For the Forest Service to best use the scoping
input, comments should be received by August 24, 1998.
Based on results of scoping and the resource capabilities within
the project areas, alternatives including a ``no action'' alternative
will be developed for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft
EIS). The Draft EIS is projected to be filed with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) in January 1999. Public comment on the Draft
EIS will be solicited for a minimum of 45 days from the date the EPA
publishes the Notice of Availability in the Federal Register. The Final
EIS is anticipated by June 1999.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns of the proposed action, comments during scoping and
comments on the Draft EIS should be as specific as possible. It is also
helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the Draft
EIS. Comments may also address the adequacy of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the document. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental
Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
In addition, Federal Court decisions have established that
reviewers of Draft EIS statements must structure their participation in
the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and
alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and concerns. Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553, (1978).
Environmental objections that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact stage may be waived if not raised until after
completion of the Final Environmental Impact Statement. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022, (9th Cir. 1986); and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338, (E.D. Wis. 1980).
The reason for this is to ensure that comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully
consider and respond to them in the Draft EIS.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposed project and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have
standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR 215 or 217.
Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d) any person may request the
agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality.
Requesters should be aware that, under FOIA, confidentiality may be
granted in only very limited circumstances, such as protected trade
secrets. The Forest Service will inform the requester of the agency's
decision regarding the request for confidentiality, and where the
request is denied, the agency will return the submission and notify the
requester that the comments may be resubmitted with or without name and
address within 7 days.
Responsible Official
Carol J. Jorgensen, Assistant Forest Supervisor, Stikine Area,
Tongass National Forest, P.O. Box 309, Petersburg, Alaska 99833, is the
responsible official. The responsible official will consider comments,
responses, disclosure of environmental consequences, and applicable
laws, regulations, and policies in making a decision and stating the
rationale in the Record of Decision.
Dated: June 24, 1998.
Carol J. Jorgensen,
Assistant Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 98-17986 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M