[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 224 (Friday, November 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 64542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-31083]
[[Page 64541]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part II
Department of Labor
_______________________________________________________________________
Employment Standards Administration
_______________________________________________________________________
Wage and Hour Division
_______________________________________________________________________
Guidance to All Government Contracting Agencies of the Federal
Government and the District of Columbia Concerning Application of
Davis-Bacon Wage Determinations to Contracts With Option Clauses;
Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 1998 /
Notices
[[Page 64542]]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment Standards Administration
Wage and Hour Division
Guidance to All Government Contracting Agencies of the Federal
Government and the District of Columbia Concerning Application of
Davis-Bacon Wage Determinations to Contracts With Option Clauses
AGENCY: Wage and Hour Division, Employment Standards Administration,
Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Wage and Hour Division is publishing its guidelines
concerning the circumstances in which the exercise of a contract option
requires a new wage determination under the Davis-Bacon and related
Acts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Helm, Office of Enforcement
Policy, Government Contracts Team, Wage and Hour Division, Employment
Standards Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-3018, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210. Telephone (202) 693-
0064. (This is not a toll free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In order to provide consistent enforcement
and administration with respect to the Davis-Bacon and related Acts,
Reorganization Plan No. 14 of 1950, 5 U.S.C. appendix, gives the
Secretary of Labor the authority to prescribe regulations, standards,
and procedures which are required to be observed by the contracting
agencies. The Secretary has delegated such authority to the Wage and
Hour Division. This includes the authority to interpret the Davis-Bacon
and related Acts and the inherent authority to issue interpretive
guidelines embodied in All Agency Memoranda informing the public of the
standards the Wage and Hour Division intends to apply in the
administration of the Davis-Bacon and related Acts.
Pursuant to this authority, the Wage and Hour Division issued on
November 9, 1992, All Agency Memorandum No. 157 (AAM 157), which
clarifies the application of Davis-Bacon wage determinations to
federally-funded and assisted construction contracts that contain
option clauses. The Wage and Hour Division, pursuant to its normal,
customary practice, endeavored to send AAM 157 to all known government
contracting agencies of the federal government and the District of
Columbia.
By decision in ARB Case No. 96-133, dated July 17, 1997, the
Administrative Review Board (ARB), which speaks finally on behalf of
the Secretary concerning matters arising under the Davis-Bacon and
related Acts, directed the Wage and Hour Division to publish AAM 157 in
the Federal Register. AAM 157 is hereby published in the Federal
Register in order to inform the public of the circumstances in which
the exercise of an option provided in a contract governed by the Davis-
Bacon and related Acts requires a new wage determination.
In addition, the ARB directed the Wage and Hour Division to provide
clarification to AAM 157 in accordance with the discussion that was
contained in the Administrator's ruling of May 2, 1996, that was the
basis for the ARB decision.
In issuing AAM 157, the Department of Labor does not assert that
the exercise of an option constitutes a new contract in all cases,
without consideration of the specific contract requirements. For
example, the Department does not consider that a new contract has been
created in situations where a contractor is simply given additional
time to complete its original contractual obligations. This situation
is distinguishable, however, from a situation where an option is
exercised obligating a contractor to perform work for a period of time
for which it was not obligated under the terms of the original
contract. In such an event, the Department considers that a new
contract has been created for purposes of issuing a new wage
determination.
Document Preparation
This document was prepared under the direction and control of John
R. Fraser, Acting Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, Employment
Standards Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of November 1998.
John R. Fraser,
Acting Administrator, Wage and Hour Division.
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration, Wage and Hour Division,
Washington, DC 20210
DEC. 9, 1992
MEMORANDUM NO. 157
TO: All Government Contracting Agencies of the Federal Government
and the District of Columbia
FROM: Karen R. Keesling, Acting Administrator
SUBJECT: Application of Davis-Bacon Wage Determinations to
Contracts with Option Clauses
This memorandum clarifies the application of Davis-Bacon wage
determination to federally-funded and assisted construction
contracts that contain option clauses, and to federal service
contracts which have a substantial and segregable amount of
construction work that require the application of the Davis-Bacon
Act and which also contain option clauses. Some contracting agencies
have not been incorporating a new or current Davis-Bacon wage
determination in these contracts at the time an option is exercised.
To ensure consistency, we are providing the following guidance on
this subject.
The Davis-Bacon Act applies to ``every contract in excess of
$2,000, to which the United States or the District of Columbia is a
party, for the construction, alteration, and/or repair, including
painting and decorating, of public buildings or public works.''
(Emphasis added.)
Multi-year construction contracts that contain option provisions
by which a contracting agency may unilaterally extend the term of
the contract require inclusion of a current wage determination at
the time the option is exercised. This requirement is consistent
with the purpose of the Davis-Bacon Act to ensure that employees be
paid prevailing wages, and the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act
(SCA) regulations governing option periods under that statute. As
explained in section 4.145(a) of Regulations, 29 CFR Part 4, the
exercise of such an option requires a contractor to perform work for
a period of time for which it would not have been obligated--and for
which the government would not have been required to pay--under the
terms of the original contract if the option had not been exercised.
Thus, once the option on a contract is exercised, the additional
period of performance becomes a new contract.
Accordingly, every federally-funded or assisted multi-year
construction contract in excess of $2,000 that contains a provision
to extend an existing contract--pursuant to an option clause or
otherwise--so that the construction is performed over an extended
period of time (as opposed to situations where a contractor is given
additional time to complete its original contract commitment), must
include a current Davis-Bacon wage determination. Similarly, just as
a current SCA wage determination must be incorporated at the
exercise of an option in an SCA contract, if an option in the SCA
contract calls for substantial and segregable construction work,
then a current Davis-Bacon wage determination must also be
incorporated at the exercise of the option.
[FR Doc. 98-31083 Filed 11-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-27-P