[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 27, 1999)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4061-4063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-1828]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 17 / Wednesday, January 27, 1999 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 4061]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 89-ANE-44]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hartzell Propeller Inc. ( )HC-( )2Y( )-
( ) Propellers
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to supersede priority letter
airworthiness directive (AD) 90-02-23 by adopting a new AD applicable
to Hartzell Propeller Inc. ( )HC-( )2Y( )-( ) propellers. Priority
letter AD 90-02-23 currently requires repetitive visual inspections of
propeller hubs for cracks using a 10X glass, and, if necessary, removal
and replacement of cracked hubs with serviceable parts. This proposal
would change the frequency and method of inspection by requiring
initial and repetitive eddy current inspections (ECI) of the propeller
hub fillet radius for cracks. In addition, this proposed AD would allow
installation of an improved design propeller hub as terminating action
to the repetitive ECI. This proposal is prompted by reports of cracked
propeller hubs found in service after they had been inspected in
accordance with the visual inspections required by the priority letter
AD. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to improve
the method for detecting propeller hub cracks, which can result in an
inflight separation of propeller blades and damage to the aircraft.
DATES: Comments must be received by March 29, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 89-ANE-44, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299. Comments may also be sent
via the Internet using the following address: ``9-ad-
[email protected]''. Comments sent via the Internet must contain the
docket number in the subject line. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from Hartzell Propeller Inc., Technical Publications
Department, One Propeller Place, Piqua, OH 45356; telephone (937) 778-
4299, fax (937) 778-4365. This information may be examined at the FAA,
New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tomaso DiPaolo, Aerospace Engineer,
Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018; telephone (847) 294-
7031, fax (847) 294-7834.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 89-ANE-44.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 89-ANE-44, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803-5299.
Discussion
On January 22, 1990, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
issued priority letter airworthiness directive (AD) 90-02-03,
applicable to Hartzell Propeller Inc. ( )HC-( )2Y( )-( ) propellers
specified by serial number, which requires repetitive (50 hour
intervals) visual inspections of propeller hubs for cracks using a 10X
glass, and, if necessary, removal and replacement of cracked hubs with
serviceable parts. That action was prompted by reports of cracked
propeller hubs.
Since the issuance of that priority letter AD, the FAA has received
fifteen reports of cracked propeller hubs that warrant that the visual
inspection requirement be removed and replaced with an eddy current
inspection requirement. Also, since five of the fifteen reports were of
cracked hubs whose serial number or model number were outside the
serial number and model number limitation denoted in the priority
letter AD, there is a need to expand the list of affected propeller
models and not limit it by serial number. In addition, the priority
letter AD required that propellers be inspected if they were installed
on any aircraft with Lycoming TIO-540 series engines and IO-540 series
engines rated at 260 horsepower or higher certificated in any category.
None of the reports received since the issuance of the priority letter
AD support this general applicability requirement and it has been
revised to address propellers installed on Piper PA-32( ) aircraft with
Textron Lycoming 540 series engines rated at 300 HP or higher, and
Britten Norman BN-2( ) aircraft with Textron Lycoming 540 series
engines. Note that five of the fifteen reports do document the
continued need to inspect propellers installed on any agricultural or
acrobatic aircraft.
[[Page 4062]]
The FAA has reviewed and approved the technical contents of
Hartzell Propeller Inc. Service Bulletin (SB) No. HC-SB-61-227, dated
January 16, 1998, that describes procedures for eddy current
inspections (ECI) of propeller hub fillet radius for cracks, and also
describes procedures for installation of an improved design propeller
hub.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other propellers of this same type design, the
proposed AD would supersede priority letter AD 90-02-03 to expand the
models of propellers affected and to require initial and repetitive
(150 hour intervals) ECI of propeller hub fillet radius for cracks,
and, if necessary, removal from service of cracked hubs and replacement
with serviceable parts. In addition, this AD allows installation of an
improved design propeller hub as terminating action to the repetitive
ECI. The actions are required to be accomplished in accordance with the
SB described previously.
There are approximately 7,745 propellers of the affected design in
the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 4,576 propellers installed
on aircraft of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD,
that it would take approximately 1 work hour per propeller to
accomplish the proposed actions, and that the average eddy current
inspection rate is $150 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators per ECI is
estimated to be $686,400.
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Hartzell Propeller Inc.: Docket No. 89-ANE-44. Supersedes priority
letter AD 90-02-03.
Applicability: Hartzell Propeller Inc ( )HC-( )2Y( )-( )
propeller models installed on Piper PA-32() aircraft with Textron
Lycoming 540 series engines rated at 300 HP or higher and Britten
Norman BN-2() aircraft with Textron Lycoming 540 series engines,
both aircraft certificated in any category, and on acrobatic
category and agricultural category aircraft.
Please note that the following list is for reference purposes
only and that this airworthiness action is not limited to the
following aircraft:
Aermacchi S.p.A. (formerly SIAI-Marchetti) S.205 series aircraft,
S.208 series aircraft, F.260 series a/c
American Champion (formerly Bellanca, Champion) 8KCAB, 8GCBC
Aviat (licensed by Sky International [formerly White International])
(Pitts) S-1T, S-2, S-2A, S-2S, S-2B
Britten Norman Islander BN-2 series aircraft Cessna A188A, A188B,
T188C
Flugzeugwerke Altenrheim AG (FFA) AS202/18A ``BRAVO'', AS202/18A4''
BRAVO''
Great Lakes Aircraft Co. 2T-1 series aircraft
Moravan National Corporation Zlin 526L
Piper PA-25-260, PA-32 series aircraft, PA-36-600
SOCATA--Groupe Aerospatiale (Morane Saulnier) MS893A, MS893E
This AD is only applicable to Hartzell propellers manufactured
before December 1991, which do not have a suffix letter ``A'' or
``B'' at the end of the hub serial number. Propellers with the
suffix letter ``A'' or ``B'' are exempt from this AD, except for the
following hubs which were reworked at the Hartzell factory in 1990:
DN3607A, DN3609A, DN3613A, DN3615A, DN3628A, DN3630A, DN3641A,
DN3940A, DN3944A, DN3949A, DN3962A.
Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each
propeller identified in the preceding applicability provision,
regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in
the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For propellers that
have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of
the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this AD. The request should include
an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or
repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the
unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include
specific proposed actions to address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect propeller hub cracks, which can result in an inflight
separation of propeller blades and damage to the aircraft,
accomplish the following:
(a) Perform initial and repetitive eddy current inspections
(ECI) of the propeller hub fillet radius for cracks in accordance
with Hartzell Propeller Inc. Service Bulletin (SB) No. HC-SB-61-227,
dated January 16, 1998, as follows:
(1) For propellers affected by the applicability requirements of
AD 90-02-23, perform the initial ECI within 50 hours time in service
(TIS) since last visual inspection conducted in accordance with AD
90-02-23. For all other applicable propellers, perform the initial
ECI within 50 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD.
(i) Prior to further flight, remove from service cracked
propeller hubs and replace with a serviceable part.
(ii) If no cracks are found, then permanently mark the hub in
accordance with Hartzell Propeller Inc. SB No. HC-SB-61-227, dated
January 16, 1998.
(2) Thereafter, perform ECI at intervals not to exceed 150 hours
TIS since last ECI. Prior to further flight, remove from service
cracked propeller hubs and replace with a serviceable part.
(b) A propeller hub from an aircraft that is identified in the
applicability section of this AD may not be removed and reused on an
aircraft for which this AD is not applicable.
(c) Terminating action to the repetitive inspection requirements
of this AD is the replacement of affected hubs with a Hartzell
propeller hub model with the serial number suffix letter ``A'' or
``B'', except for the following hubs which were reworked at the
Hartzell factory in 1990: DN3607A, DN3609A, DN3613A, DN3615A,
DN3628A, DN3630A, DN3641A, DN3940A, DN3944A, DN3949A, DN3962A. The
hub replacement must be performed in accordance with Hartzell
Propeller Inc. SB No. HC-SB-61-227, dated January 16, 1998.
(d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification
Office. Operators shall submit their request through an appropriate
FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then
send it to the Manager, Chicago Aircraft Certification Office.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of
[[Page 4063]]
compliance with this airworthiness directive, if any, may be
obtained from the Chicago Aircraft Certification Office.
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where
the inspection requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on January 20, 1999.
Ronald L. Vavruska,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 99-1828 Filed 1-26-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U