[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 106 (Thursday, June 3, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29796-29799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-13797]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[SD-001-0003a and SD-001-0004a; FRL-6351-8]
Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants; South Dakota Control of Landfill Gas
Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA approves the South Dakota plan and regulations for
controlling landfill gas emissions from existing municipal solid waste
(MSW) landfills. South Dakota's regulations require existing MSW
landfills to install a landfill gas collection and control system, if
the MSW landfill's design capacity and non-methane organic compound
(NMOC) emissions are above certain thresholds. South Dakota submitted
its original plan to EPA on May 2, 1997 and then submitted revisions to
the plan on May 6, 1999.
[[Page 29797]]
South Dakota submitted this plan to meet section 111(d) of the Clean
Air Act (Act) and EPA's Emission Guidelines for existing MSW landfills
at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc. We approve South Dakota's plan because
the State has met these requirements.
DATES: This rule is effective on August 2, 1999 without further notice,
unless we receive adverse comment by July 6, 1999. If we receive
adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct
final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule
will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: You should mail your written comments to Richard R. Long,
Director, Air and Radiation Program, Mailcode 8P-AR, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 500,
Denver, Colorado 80202. Copies of the documents relative to this action
are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Air
and Radiation Program, Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII,
999 18th Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466. Copies of the
State documents relevant to this action are available for public
inspection at the Department of Environmental and Natural Resources,
Joe Foss Building, 523 East Capitol, Pierre, South Dakota 57501-3181.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicki Stamper, EPA Region VIII, (303)
312-6445.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. EPA Action
A. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
We approve the South Dakota plan and regulations for controlling
landfill gas emissions from existing municipal solid waste (MSW)
landfills, except for those landfills located in Indian Country
1. South Dakota submitted its original plan to us on May 2,
1997 and then submitted revisions to the plan on May 6, 1999. South
Dakota's Plan includes the ``Section 111(d) State Plan for Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills'' and the State's regulations in Sections
74:36:07:34 through 74:36:07:42 of the Administrative Rules of South
Dakota (ARSD).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See further discussion in Section I.D. of this preamble.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view
this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register
publication, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as
the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed.
This rule will be effective August 2, 1999 without further notice
unless we receive adverse comments by July 6, 1999. If we receive
adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. We
will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on
the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time.
B. Why Is EPA Approving South Dakota's Plan for MSW Landfills?
We reviewed South Dakota's plan, as revised by the State, and found
that it meets the general requirements for section 111(d) plans in 40
CFR part 60, subpart B, and the specific requirements for existing MSW
landfills in 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc (as revised on June 16, 1998,
63 FR 32743-53).
C. What Does the South Dakota Plan Contain?
South Dakota's plan includes:
1. A demonstration that South Dakota has adequate legal authority
to adopt and implement the plan;
2. Sections 74:36:07:34 through 74:36:07:42 of the ARSD as the
enforceable mechanism for implementing the Emission Guidelines;
3. An inventory of all existing MSW landfills subject to the State
Plan, including an estimation of NMOC emissions and design capacity of
each landfill;
4. Emission limits that are no less stringent than the Emission
Guidelines;
5. A process for the State's review and approval of the design plan
for a landfill's gas collection and control system;
6. A final compliance date of thirty months from the date of the
first NMOC emission rate report showing emissions equal to or greater
than 50 megagrams per year (Mg/yr);
7. ``Increments of progress'' deadlines to ensure the landfills are
on track to meet the final compliance date;
8. Testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements
for existing MSW landfills that are no less stringent than the Emission
Guidelines;
9. A commitment to submit annual progress reports to EPA on
implementation of the State Plan; and
10. Documentation that the State met all public participation
requirements for its two rulemaking hearings. Further details of the
State's Plan can be found in the Technical Support Document for this
action, which you can obtain by contacting the Regional Office contact
listed above. The specific requirements of the State's Plan as it
applies to MSW landfills are described below.
D. What MSW Landfills Are Subject to South Dakota's Plan?
If you are the owner or operator of a MSW landfill in South Dakota,
then you are subject to South Dakota's plan if
1. The landfill accepted waste since November 8, 1987;
2. The landfill was constructed, reconstructed, or modified before
May 30, 1991; and
3. The landfill's design capacity is greater than or equal to 2.5
million Mg and 2.5 million m\3\.
If your landfill was constructed, reconstructed, or modified after
May 30, 1991, then you are subject to the New Source Performance
Standard in 40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW (incorporated into the ARSD in
section 74:36:07:43), rather than South Dakota's plan for ``existing
landfills.'' If you have questions on how a MSW landfill is defined,
refer to the definitions in 40 CFR part 60, subparts Cc and WWW.
If your landfill is located in Indian Country, then you will be
subject to the Federal Plan which was proposed on December 16, 1998 (63
FR 69634-69684) and which will be finalized in the near future. We are
not approving South Dakota's plan for landfills located in Indian
Country. Note that we are currently discussing with the State and the
Tribes how to describe Indian Country in South Dakota. A more specific
description of Indian Country will be published in a future Federal
Register notice concerning approval of the State's New Source
Performance Standard for MSW landfills.
E. What Requirements Apply to MSW Landfills in South Dakota That Are
Subject to the State's Plan?
If you are the owner or operator of an existing MSW landfill that
South Dakota determined has a design capacity of 2.5 million Mg or 2.5
million m\3\, then you must submit an initial report of your landfill's
NMOC emission rate to the State by November 1, 1999. You must also
submit updated NMOC emission rate reports annually or every five years
as required by ARSD 74:36:07:42.01. The landfill's NMOC emission rate
must be calculated in accordance with 40 CFR 60.754.
Once the landfill's NMOC emission rate is equal to or greater than
50 Mg/yr, then you must install a landfill gas collection and control
system that meets the specifications of ARSD 74:36:07:36-37. You must
also comply with the operational standards, compliance provisions,
monitoring provisions, and recordkeeping and reporting
[[Page 29798]]
requirements in sections 74:36:07:39-42 of the ARSD.
F. By What Date Are Existing MSW Landfills Required To Comply With
South Dakota's Plan?
If you are required to install a gas collection and control system,
then you must complete construction of that system within thirty months
of your first annual NMOC emission rate report showing emissions equal
to or greater than 50 Mg/yr. You must also meet the interim deadlines
specified in sections 74:36:07:35 and 38 for submitting your design
plan, awarding contracts, beginning construction, and demonstrating
compliance.
G. What Is a Section 111(d) State Plan?
Whenever we issue a New Source Performance Standard for a source
category controlling a pollutant which is not a ``criteria pollutant''
regulated under section 110 of the Act or a hazardous air pollutant
(HAP) regulated under section 112 of the Act, EPA must issue guidelines
for controlling that pollutant at existing sources of the same source
category. Criteria pollutants are pollutants for which EPA has issued
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) (see 40 CFR part 50).
A section 111(d) State Plan must meet the Emission Guidelines which
we issued for that source category, as well as the general requirements
that apply to all section 111(d) plans in 40 CFR part 60, subpart B.
States are required to submit plans meeting those requirements within
nine months after publication of Emission Guidelines.
H. Why Did EPA Regulate Landfill Gas Emissions?
Landfill gas emissions contain a mixture of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), other organic compounds, methane, and HAPs. VOC
emissions can contribute to ozone formation which can result in adverse
effects to human health and vegetation. The health effects of HAPs
include cancer, respiratory irritation, and damage to the nervous
system. Methane emissions contribute to global climate change and can
result in fires or explosions when they accumulate in structures on or
off the landfill site. NMOC emissions are measured as a surrogate for
MSW landfill emissions. We issued New Source Performance Standards to
control landfill gas emissions from new, modified, or reconstructed MSW
landfills on March 12, 1996. (See 40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW.) Since
NMOCs are not a criteria pollutant or a HAP, we also issued Emission
Guidelines for existing MSW landfills on March 12, 1996. (See 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Cc.)
Note that we revised the Emission Guidelines and New Source
Performance Standards for MSW landfills on June 16, 1998, in response
to our proposed settlement in National Solid Wastes Management
Association v. Browner, et. al., No. 96-1152 (D.C. Cir). (See 63 FR
32743-32784). In addition, we issued technical amendments to the
Emission Guidelines and New Source Performance Standard on February 24,
1999 (64 FR 9258-9262).
IV. What Are the Administrative Requirements Associated With This
Action?
A. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory
Planning and Review.''
B. Executive Order 12875
Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership
Under Executive Order 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is
not required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a state, local,
or tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those
governments, or EPA consults with those governments. If EPA complies by
consulting, Executive Order 12875 requires EPA to provide to the Office
of Management and Budget a description of the extent of EPA's prior
consultation with representatives of affected state, local, and tribal
governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of any written
communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the
need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 12875
requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected
officials and other representatives of state, local, and tribal
governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development
of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.''
Today's rule does not create a mandate on State, local, or tribal
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these
entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of Executive
Order 12875 do not apply to this rule.
C. Executive Order 13045
Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to
any rule that: (1) is determined to be ``economically significant'' as
defined under E.O. 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or
safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate
effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the
Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the
planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible
alternatives considered by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does not involve
decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or safety risks.
D. Executive Order 13084 Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments
Under Executive Order 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is
not required by statute, that significantly affects or uniquely affects
the communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the
Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct
compliance costs incurred by the tribal governments, or EPA consults
with those governments. If EPA complies by consulting, Executive Order
13084 requires EPA to provide to the Office of Management and Budget,
in a separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a
description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with
representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature
of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the
regulation. In addition, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to develop
an effective process permitting elected officials and other
representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful
and timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters
that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.'' Today's rule
does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian
tribal governments. Accordingly, the requirements of section 3(b) of
Executive Order 13084 do not apply to this rule.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the
[[Page 29799]]
agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small
governmental jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities because State Plan
approvals under section 111 of the Clean Air Act do not create any new
requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is already
imposing. Therefore, because the Federal approval of the State Plan
does not create any new requirements, I certify that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship
under the Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would
constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state
action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning
SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246,
255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
F. Unfunded Mandates
Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to
private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA must
select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory
requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan for
informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly
or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated here does
not include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in
the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves
pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
H. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 2, 1999. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Methane, Municipal
solid waste landfills, Nonmethane organic compounds, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 21, 1999.
Jack W. McGraw,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
40 CFR part 62, subpart QQ, of chapter I, title 40 is amended as
follows:
PART 62--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7642.
2. Subpart QQ is added to read as follows:
Subpart QQ--South Dakota
Sec.
62.10350 Identification of plan.
62.10351 Identification of sources.
62.10352 Effective date.
Subpart QQ--South Dakota
Landfill Gas Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills
Sec. 62.10350 Identification of plan.
``Section 111(d) State Plan for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills''
and the State's implementing regulations in Sections 74:36:07:34
through 74:36:07:42 of the Administrative Rules of South Dakota (ARSD),
submitted by the State on May 2, 1997 with amendments to the plan
submitted on May 6, 1999.
Sec. 62.10351 Identification of sources.
The plan applies to all existing municipal solid waste landfills
for which construction, reconstruction, or modification was commenced
before May 30, 1991 that accepted waste at any time since November 8,
1987 or that have additional capacity available for future waste
deposition, as described in 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc.
Sec. 62.10352 Effective date.
The effective date of the plan for municipal solid waste landfills
is August 2, 1999.
[FR Doc. 99-13797 Filed 6-2-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P