[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 1999)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 44134-44135] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 99-21011] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [CA 207-156; FRL-6409-4] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, South Coast Air Quality Management District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing the approval of revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) proposed in the Federal Register on May 4, 1999. The revisions concern rules from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). This approval action will incorporate these rules into the federally approved SIP. The intended effect of approving these rules is to regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). The revised rules control VOC emissions from solvent cleaning and motor vehicle refinish coating operations. Thus, EPA is finalizing the approval of these revisions into the California SIP under provisions of the CAA regarding EPA action on SIP submittals, SIPs for national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards and plan requirements for nonattainment areas. EFFECTIVE DATE: This action is effective on September 13, 1999. ADDRESSES: Copies of the revised rules and EPA's evaluation report for each rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX office during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted revised rules are available for inspection at the following locations: Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105 Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460 California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812 South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office, (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, Telephone: (415) 744- 1185. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Applicability The rules being approved into the California SIP include: SCAQMD Rules 1151--Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations, and Rule 1171--Solvent Cleaning Operations. These rules were submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to EPA on March 10, 1998. II. Background On May 4, 1999 in 64 FR 23813, EPA proposed to approve the following rules into the California SIP: SCAQMD's Rule 1151--Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations and SCAQMD's Rule 1171--Solvent Cleaning Operations. Rule 1151 and 1171 were amended by SCAQMD on June 13, 1997. Both rules were submitted by CARB to EPA on March 10, 1998. These rules were submitted in response to EPA's 1988 SIP-Call and the CAA section 182(a)(2)(A) requirement that nonattainment areas fix their reasonably available control technology (RACT) rules for ozone in accordance with EPA guidance that interpreted the requirements of the pre-amendment Act. A detailed discussion of the background for each of the above rules and nonattainment areas is provided in the NPRM cited above. EPA has evaluated the above rules for consistency with the requirements of the CAA and EPA regulations and EPA interpretation of these requirements as expressed in the various EPA policy guidance documents referenced in the NPRM(s) cited above. EPA has found that the rules meet the applicable EPA requirements. A detailed discussion of the rule provisions and evaluations has been provided in 64 FR 23774 and in technical support documents (TSDs) available at EPA's Region IX office (TSDs dated July 1998, SCAQMD's Rules 1171 and 1151). III. Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in 64 FR 23774. EPA received a comment from EPI Research (EPIR) regarding Rule 1171. EPIR commented that they did not have accurate information from SCAQMD during the rule making process and that lowered VOC and/or vapor pressure limits of cleaning solvents would be difficult, if not impossible to meet, or were not commercially available. For this reason EPIR requested that EPA withhold approval of SCAQMD's Rule 1171 into the California SIP. EPA has evaluated the information submitted by California regarding Rule 1171 and determined that it fulfills the procedural requirements of 40 CFR 51, Appendix V, including the requirements of 2.1(f) public notice, (g) public hearing, and (h) compilation of public comments and responses. Furthermore, under CAA section 110(a)(2), EPA may not consider the economic or technological feasibility of the provisions of the SCAQMD rule in approval of the SIP revision. Union Electric v. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 265-266 (1976). As noted by the Supreme Court, it is the province of the State or local authorities to determine whether or not to impose more stringent limits that may require technology forcing. EPA must assess the SIP revision on the basis of factors set forth in CAA section 110(a)(2) which include reasonable notice and public hearings in the adoption process, but does not provide for the disapproval of a rule in a SIP based upon economic or technological infeasibility. For these reasons the comments submitted do not affect the incorporation of SCAQMD's Rule 1171 into the California SIP. IV. EPA Action EPA is finalizing action to approve the above rules for inclusion into the California SIP. EPA is approving the submittal under section 110(k)(3) as meeting the requirements of section 110(a) and Part D of the CAA. This approval action will incorporate these rules into the federally approved SIP. The intended effect of approving these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in [[Page 44135]] accordance with the requirements of the CAA. V. Administrative Requirements A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13045 The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review. The final rule is not subject to E.O. 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks,'' because it is not an ``economically significant'' action under E.O. 12866. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 50,000. SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C. Unfunded Mandates Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan for informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule. EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre- existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new Federal requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action. D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). E. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 12, 1999. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the Federal Register on July 1, 1982. Dated: July 19, 1999. David P. Howekamp, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c) (254)(i)(D)(2) to read as follows: Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * (254) * * * (i) * * * (D) * * * (2) Rule 1151, adopted on July 8, 1988 and amended on June 13, 1997, and Rule 1171, adopted on August 2, 1991 and amended on June 13, 1997. * * * * * [FR Doc. 99-21011 Filed 8-12-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P