[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 52 (Thursday, March 17, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14642-14679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05138]
[[Page 14641]]
Vol. 81
Thursday,
No. 52
March 17, 2016
Part IV
Department of Energy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 CFR Parts 429 and 431
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Conservation Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial
Equipment: Test Procedures for Commercial Packaged Boilers; Proposed
Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 81 , No. 52 / Thursday, March 17, 2016 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 14642]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Parts 429 and 431
[Docket Number EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006]
RIN 1904-AD16
Energy Conservation Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial
Equipment: Test Procedures for Commercial Packaged Boilers
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and public meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to amend the test
procedure and applicable definitions for commercial packaged boilers,
as well as modify the sampling plans for commercial packaged boilers in
its regulations pertaining to energy efficiency programs for certain
programs for commercial and industrial equipment. This rulemaking will
fulfill DOE's statutory obligations to make its test procedure
consistent with the applicable industry test procedure and to review
its test procedures for covered equipment at least once every seven
years. In this notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR), DOE proposes to
incorporate by reference certain sections of the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI)/Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration
Institute (AHRI) Standard 1500, ``2015 Standard for Performance Rating
of Commercial Space Heating Boilers,'' and, in addition, incorporate
amendments that clarify the coverage for field-constructed commercial
packaged boilers and the applicability of DOE's test procedure and
standards for this category of commercial packaged boilers, provide an
optional field test for commercial packaged boilers with fuel input
rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h, provide a conversion method to
calculate thermal efficiency based on combustion efficiency testing for
steam commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than
5,000,000 Btu/h, modify the inlet and outlet water temperatures during
tests of hot water commercial packaged boilers, establish limits on the
ambient temperature and relative humidity conditions during testing,
modify setup and instrumentation requirements to remove ambiguity, and
standardize terminology and provisions for ``fuel input rate.'' This
NOPR also announces a public meeting to discuss and invite comments,
data, and information about the issues and proposed amendments
presented in this test procedure rulemaking for commercial packaged
boilers.
DATES: Meeting: DOE will hold a public meeting on Monday, April 4,
2016, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m., in Washington, DC. The meeting will also
be broadcast as a webinar. See section V, ``Public Participation,'' for
webinar registration information, participant instructions, and
information about the capabilities available to webinar participants.
Comments: DOE will accept written comments, data, and information
regarding this NOPR before and after the public meeting, but not later
than May 31, 2016. See section V, ``Public Participation,'' for
details.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of
Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 6E-069, 1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121. Persons may also attend the public meeting
via webinar. To attend, please notify Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202) 586-
2945. For more information, refer to section V, ``Public
Participation,'' near the end of this notice.
Interested parties are encouraged to submit comments using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Interested parties
may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include
docket number EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006 and/or regulation identifier number
(RIN) 1904-AD16 in the subject line of the message. Submit electronic
comments in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or ASCII file format, and
avoid the use of special characters or any form of encryption.
Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Office, Mailstop EE-5B, Test Procedure
for Commercial and Industrial Packaged Boilers, Docket No. EERE-2014-
BT-TP-0006 and/or RIN 1904-AD16, 1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121. If possible, please submit all items on a
compact disc (CD), in which case it is not necessary to include printed
copies.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies Office, 950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Suite
600, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. If possible,
please submit all items on a CD, in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies.
No telefacsimiles (faxes) will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see section V, ``Public Participation,'' of this
document.
Docket: The docket, which includes Federal Register notices, public
meeting attendee lists and transcripts, comments, and other supporting
documents/materials, is available for review at www.regulations.gov.
All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. However, not all documents listed in the index may be publicly
available, such as those containing information that is exempt from
public disclosure.
A link to the docket Web page can be found at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006. This Web
page contains a link to the docket for this NOPR on the
www.regulations.gov site. The www.regulations.gov Web page contains
simple instructions on how to access all documents, including public
comments, in the docket. See section V, ``Public Participation,'' for
information on how to submit comments through www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Raba, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-8654. Email:
[email protected].
Mr. Peter Cochran, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121. Telephone: (202) 586-9496. Email: [email protected].
For further information on how to submit a comment, review other
public comments and the docket, or participate in the public meeting,
contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202) 586-2945 or by email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This proposed rule would incorporate by reference into 10 CFR parts
429 and 431 the testing methods contained in the following commercial
standard:
AHRI/ANSI Standard 1500-2015, ``Performance Rating of Commercial
Space Heating Boilers,'' Section 3 ``Definitions,'' Section 5 ``Rating
Requirements,'' Appendix C ``Methods of Testing for Rating Commercial
Space Heating Boilers--Normative,'' excluding Figures C5 and C7,
Appendix D ``Properties of Saturated Steam--Normative,'' and Appendix E
[[Page 14643]]
``Correction Factors for Heating Values of Fuel Gases--Normative,''
ANSI approved November 28, 2014.
Copies of AHRI standards may be purchased from the Air-
Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute, 2111 Wilson Blvd.,
Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201, or by visiting http://www.ahrinet.org/site/686/Standards/HVACR-Industry-Standards/Search-Standards.
See section IV.M for additional information on this standard.
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
II. Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
III. Discussion
A. Proposing to Adopt Certain Sections of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015
B. Scope and Definitions
1. Definition of Commercial Packaged Boiler
2. Field-Constructed Commercial Packaged Boilers
C. Testing of Large Commercial Packaged Boilers
1. Field Tests for Commercial Packaged Boilers
2. Method To Convert Combustion Efficiency to Thermal Efficiency
for Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers
3. Alternative Efficiency Determination Methods
4. Steam Commercial Packaged Boiler Operating Pressure
D. Hot Water Commercial Packaged Boiler Operating Temperatures
1. Existing Requirements
2. Issues With Water Temperature Requirements and Proposed
Changes
3. Allowable Uncertainty in Water Temperature Measurement
4. Water Flow Rate During Testing
E. Testing Conditions
F. Setup and Instrumentation
G. Fuel Input Rate
H. Clerical Issues
I. Other Issues
1. Stack Temperature Adjustment for Using Combustion Efficiency
in Steam Mode To Represent Hot Water Mode
2. Testing at Part Load
3. Other Industry Test Procedures
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration
Act of 1974
M. Description of Materials Incorporated by Reference
V. Public Participation
A. Attendance at the Public Meeting
B. Procedure for Submitting Prepared General Statements for
Distribution
C. Conduct of the Public Meeting
D. Submission of Comments
E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority and Background
Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (42
U.S.C. 6311, et seq.; ``EPCA'' or, ``the Act'') sets forth a variety of
provisions designed to improve energy efficiency.\1\ Part C of Title
III establishes the ``Energy Conservation Program for Certain
Industrial Equipment,'' which covers certain industrial equipment
(hereafter referred to as ``covered equipment''), including commercial
packaged boilers.\2\ (42 U.S.C. 6311(1)(J))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the Energy Efficiency Improvement Act of 2015
(April 30, 2015).
\2\ For editorial reasons, Part C was codified as Part A-1 in
the U.S. Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under EPCA, the energy conservation program consists essentially of
four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. The
testing requirements consist of test procedures that manufacturers of
covered equipment must use as the basis for (1) certifying to the
Department of Energy (DOE) that their equipment complies with
applicable energy conservation standards adopted under EPCA, and (2)
making representations about the efficiency of the equipment.
Similarly, DOE must use these test procedures to determine whether the
equipment complies with any relevant standards promulgated under EPCA.
With respect to commercial packaged boilers (CPB), EPCA requires
DOE to use industry test procedures developed or recognized by the Air-
Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) or the
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning
Engineers (ASHRAE), as referenced in ASHRAE/IES \3\ Standard 90.1,
``Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential
Buildings.'' (42 U.S.C. 6314(a)(4)(A)) Further, if such an industry
test procedure is amended, DOE is required to amend its test procedure
to be consistent with the amended industry test procedure, unless it
determines, by rule published in the Federal Register and supported by
clear and convincing evidence, that the amended test procedure would be
unduly burdensome to conduct or would not produce test results that
reflect the energy efficiency, energy use, and estimated operating
costs of that equipment during a representative average use cycle. (42
U.S.C. 6314(a)(4)(B))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Illuminating Engineering Society.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPCA also requires that, at least once every 7 years, DOE evaluate
test procedures for each type of covered equipment, including
commercial packaged boilers, to determine whether amended test
procedures would more accurately or fully comply with the requirements
for the test procedures to not be unduly burdensome to conduct and be
reasonably designed to produce test results that reflect energy
efficiency, energy use, and estimated operating costs during a
representative average use cycle. (42 U.S.C. 6314(a)(1)(A)) DOE last
reviewed the test procedures for commercial packaged boilers on July
22, 2009. 74 FR 36312. Therefore, DOE is required to re-evaluate the
test procedures no later than July 22, 2016, and this rulemaking
satisfies that requirement. As the industry standard for commercial
packaged boilers was recently updated, this rulemaking will also
fulfill DOE's statutory obligations to make its test procedure
consistent with the applicable industry test procedure.
On September 3, 2013, DOE initiated a test procedure and energy
conservation standards rulemaking for commercial packaged boilers and
published a notice of public meeting and availability of the Framework
document (September 2013 Framework document). 78 FR 54197. Both in the
September 2013 Framework document and during the October 1, 2013 public
meeting, DOE solicited public comments, data, and information on all
aspects of, and any issues or problems with, the existing DOE test
procedure, including whether the test procedure is in need of updates
or revisions. More recently, DOE also received comments on the test
procedure in response to the notice of availability of the preliminary
technical support document (TSD) for the standards rulemaking, which
was published in the Federal Register on November 20, 2014 (November
2014 Preliminary Analysis). 79 FR 69066.
Additionally, on February 20, 2014, DOE published in the Federal
Register a request for information (February 2014 RFI) seeking comments
on the existing DOE test procedure for commercial packaged boilers,
which incorporates by reference Hydronics Institute (HI)/AHRI Standard
BTS-2000 (Rev 06.07), ``Method to Determine Efficiency of Commercial
Space Heating Boilers'' (BTS-2000). 79 FR 9643. BTS-2000
[[Page 14644]]
provides test procedures for measuring steady-state combustion and
thermal efficiency of a gas-fired or oil-fired commercial packaged
boiler capable of producing hot water and/or steam and operating at
full load only. In the February 2014 RFI, DOE requested comments,
information, and data about a number of issues, including (1) part-load
testing and part-load efficiency rating, (2) typical inlet and outlet
water temperatures for hot water commercial packaged boilers, (3) the
steam pressure for steam commercial packaged boilers operating at full
load, and (4) design characteristics of commercial packaged boilers
that are difficult to test under the existing DOE test procedure.
Subsequently, on April 29, 2015, AHRI, together with the American
National Standards Institute (ANSI), published the ``2015 Standard for
Performance Rating of Commercial Space Heating Boilers'' (ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015). ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 states ``this
standard supersedes AHRI Hydronics Institute Standard BTS-2000 Rev.
06.07'' in the front matter of the document. DOE believes that ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015 is consistent with the existing metrics and
approach incorporated in BTS-2000 but also incorporates provisions that
improve the accuracy and repeatability of the test procedure over the
BTS-2000 standard. ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 also adopts several
changes that were suggested in public comments submitted by interested
parties in response to DOE's September 2013 Framework document,
November 2014 Preliminary Analysis, and February 2014 RFI.\4\
Therefore, as required by 42 U.S.C. 6314(a)(4)(B), DOE is replacing
BTS-2000 with the updated industry standard, ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015, as the basis for the DOE test procedure. Section III.A contains a
more detailed discussion of the basis for transitioning to the
commercial packaged boiler test procedures outlined in ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Comments received as part of the February 2014 RFI about
test procedures for commercial packaged boilers are in Docket Number
EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006. In some cases, earlier comments that address
or are relevant to test procedures for commercial packaged boilers
are in the energy conservation standards docket, Docket Number EERE-
2013-BT-STD-0030. These comments in response to the September 2013
Framework Document relevant to the test procedure are also placed in
the test procedure rulemaking docket, Docket Number EERE-2014-BT-TP-
0006
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
In this notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR), DOE proposes to amend
its existing test procedures for commercial packaged boilers at 10 CFR
431.86. DOE proposes to incorporate by reference certain sections of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 as a direct replacement for BTS-2000
since, as discussed in section I, ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015
supersedes BTS -2000 and DOE has found ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 to
be more accurate compared to BTS-2000 and not unduly burdensome to
conduct for the purposes of testing commercial packaged boilers.
To obtain information and data regarding its current test
procedures for commercial packaged boilers, DOE sought public comment
in the September 2013 Framework document, February 2014 RFI, and
November 2014 Preliminary Analysis. In response to the September 2013
Framework document, DOE received comments from the American Boiler
Manufacturers Association (ABMA), AHRI, Burnham Holdings (Burnham),
Cleaver-Brooks, HTP Incorporated (HTP), and a joint submission \5\ from
the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), the
Appliance Standards Awareness Project (ASAP), and the National
Resources Defense Council (NRDC). In response to the February 2014 RFI,
DOE received comments from ACEEE, AHRI, Burnham, HTP, the National
Propane Gas Association (NPGA), and Sidel Systems (Sidel) (three
submittals). Sidel submitted two comments prior to the publication of
the February 2014 RFI that also pertain to commercial packaged boilers.
In response to the November 2014 Preliminary Analysis, DOE received
comments from ABMA, AHRI, Lochinvar LLC (Lochinvar), Raypak, and joint
submissions \6\ from Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE) and Southern
California Edison (SCE), and ACEEE, ASAP, and NRDC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The joint submission by ACEEE, ASAP, and NRDC is referred to
as the ``Joint Advocates'' comment in references to the documents
submitted to the docket.
\6\ The joint submission by PGE and SCE is referred to as the
``Joint Utilities'' comment in references to the documents submitted
to the docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The comments received from stakeholders typically concern BTS-2000
since ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 had not yet been published at the
time DOE solicited comments. Some of the comments received from
stakeholders that concerned BTS-2000 apply equally to ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015, whereas other comments are not applicable to ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 updates several provisions from BTS-
2000 to: (1) Improve repeatability of testing; (2) further clarify the
test procedure; and (3) increase the allowable operating steam pressure
during steam commercial packaged boiler testing. ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 also incorporates provisions that accommodate the testing of
large commercial packaged boilers that have difficulty meeting the
requirements in the existing DOE test procedure.
In addition to adopting ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 as a
replacement for BTS-2000 in the DOE test procedure, DOE further
proposes several modifications to its test procedure that are not
captured in ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. The additional proposed
amendments include the following:
Clarifying the coverage of field constructed commercial
packaged boilers under DOE's regulations;
incorporating an optional field test for commercial
packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h;
incorporating an optional conversion method to calculate
thermal efficiency based on combustion efficiency test for steam
commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000
Btu/h;
modifying the inlet and outlet water temperatures required
during tests of hot water commercial packaged boilers to be more
representative of field conditions;
requiring additional limits on the room ambient
temperature and relative humidity during testing;
modifying setup and instrumentation requirements to remove
ambiguity; and
standardizing terminology and provisions in regulatory
text related to ``fuel input rate.''
These proposed amendments are intended to improve the repeatability
of the test and to accommodate some commercial packaged boilers for
which testing has previously been difficult or burdensome. DOE reviewed
these additional proposed amendments as well as the proposal to
incorporate by reference ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 under 42 U.S.C.
6314(a)(4)(C) and, in aggregate, DOE has tentatively concluded that
there would not be an overall effect on efficiency ratings.
Accordingly, DOE proposes that the amended test procedure would be
effective 30 days after publication of any final rule in the Federal
Register and would be required for any representations made with regard
to the energy efficiency of commercial packaged boilers 360 days
following publication of any final rule in the Federal Register. (42
U.S.C. 6314(d))
[[Page 14645]]
DOE's rationale regarding the impact of the proposed test procedure
amendments on measured energy efficiency of commercial packaged boilers
is discussed in the subsequent sections.
III. Discussion
Based on DOE's review of the existing test procedure for commercial
packaged boilers and comments submitted by interested parties, DOE has
determined that certain amendments and clarifications are necessary in
order to improve the repeatability of the DOE test procedure,
accommodate certain commercial packaged boilers for which manufacturers
have expressed difficulty testing under the provisions of the existing
test procedure, and clarify the applicability of DOE's test procedure
and energy conservation standards to field-constructed equipment. The
following sections address comments received and propose specific
improvements for DOE's test procedures for commercial packaged boilers.
A. Proposing To Adopt Certain Sections of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015
The existing DOE test procedure for commercial packaged boilers
incorporates by reference BTS-2000 to determine the steady-state
efficiency of steam or hot water commercial packaged boilers while
operating at full load. As described in section I, on April 29, 2015,
AHRI published a new ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 (ANSI approved
November 28, 2014), which supersedes BTS-2000. On May 29, 2015, AHRI
submitted a request directly to DOE to update the incorporation by
reference in the DOE test procedure to reference the new ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015. (Docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006, AHRI, No. 29 at p. 1)
\7\ DOE reviewed both documents and DOE believes that the recently
published ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 standard is not unduly
burdensome to conduct and represents an improvement over BTS-2000 while
retaining the general testing methodology and metrics (i.e., thermal
and combustion efficiency) of the existing test procedure.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ A notation in this form provides a reference for information
that is in Docket No. EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006. This particular notation
refers to a comment from AHRI on p. 1 of document number 29 in the
docket.
\8\ Thermal efficiency is measured for all commercial packaged
boilers except for oil-fired and gas-fired commercial packaged
boilers that provide hot water and have greater than 2,500,000 Btu/h
in fuel input rate, for which combustion efficiency is used. See 10
CFR 431.87(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 contains the following
key substantive changes as compared to BTS-2000:
Improvements in instrumentation accuracy specifications,
including removing outdated instrumentation; use of more appropriate
measurement units; and revising gas chemistry instrumentation accuracy
requirements to reflect those of commonly used devices;
more specific instructions for establishing test procedure
configuration, particularly for water piping and positioning of
temperature measurement devices in fluid stream;
establishment of criteria that indicate when a steady-
state condition is met; \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ BTS 2000 noted in section 9.1.1.1.6 that ``a state of
equilibrium shall have been reached when consistent readings are
obtained during a 30 minute period,'' but did not explicitly define
what ``consistent'' meant. ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 incorporates
specific thresholds for steam pressure and percent CO2 or
O2 in the flue gas to specify the maximum allowable
fluctuations that may occur during ``steady-state'' operation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
allowance of steam operating pressure up to 15 psig; and
instructions addressing how to conduct testing when
manufacturers do not provide sufficient information within their
installation materials shipped with the commercial packaged boiler.
DOE notes that several of the changes incorporated into ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015 were also suggested by interested parties in public
comments responding to DOE's September 2013 Framework document,
November 2014 Preliminary Analysis, and February 2014 RFI.
DOE seeks comment on its proposal to replace BTS-2000 with ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015 in its test procedure for commercial packaged
boilers. This is identified as Issue 1 in section V.E.
B. Scope and Definitions
DOE proposes to incorporate several new definitions that help
clarify the scope and applicability of DOE's commercial packaged boiler
test procedure. DOE notes that any changes or amendments to DOE's
definitions at 10 CFR 431.82, if adopted, would also apply to DOE's
energy conservation standards for commercial packaged boilers.
1. Definition of Commercial Packaged Boiler
While EPCA authorizes DOE to establish, subject to certain
criteria, test procedures and energy conservation standards for
packaged boilers, to date, DOE has only established test procedures and
standards for commercial packaged boilers, a subset of packaged
boilers. In 2004, DOE published a final rule (October 2004 final rule)
establishing definitions, test procedures, and energy conservation
standards for commercial packaged boilers. 69 FR 61949 (Oct. 21, 2004).
In the October 2004 final rule, DOE defined ``commercial packaged
boiler'' as a type of packaged low pressure boiler that is industrial
equipment with a capacity (fuel input rate) of 300,000 Btu per hour
(Btu/h) or more which, to any significant extent, is distributed in
commerce: (1) For heating or space conditioning applications in
buildings; or (2) for service water heating in buildings but does not
meet the definition of ``hot water supply boiler.'' DOE also defined
``packaged low pressure boiler'' as a packaged boiler that is: (1) A
steam boiler designed to operate at or below a steam pressure of 15
psig; or (2) a hot water commercial packaged boiler designed to operate
at or below a water pressure of 160 psig and a temperature of
250[emsp14][deg]F; or (3) a boiler that is designed to be capable of
supplying either steam or hot water, and designed to operate under the
conditions in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this definition. 69 FR 61960.
DOE notes that, because commercial packaged boilers are currently
defined as a subset of packaged low pressure boilers, all commercial
packaged boilers have to meet the pressure and temperature criteria
established in the definition of a ``packaged low pressure boiler.''
Consequently, DOE is proposing to modify DOE's definition of
``commercial packaged boiler'' to explicitly include the pressure and
temperature criteria established by the ``packaged low pressure
boiler'' definition. DOE believes such a modification will clarify the
characteristics of the equipment to which DOE's test procedure and
energy conservation standards apply. As a result, DOE proposes to
remove its definition for packaged low pressure boiler, as it is no
longer necessary. DOE notes that the term ``packaged high pressure
boiler'' also is no longer used in the commercial packaged boiler
subpart, and therefore proposes to remove its definition. DOE seeks
comment on these proposals. This is identified as Issue 2 in section
V.E.
2. Field-Constructed Commercial Packaged Boilers
EPCA establishes the statutory authority by which DOE may regulate
``packaged boilers'' and defines a ``packaged boiler'' as a boiler that
is shipped complete with heating equipment, mechanical draft
[[Page 14646]]
equipment, and automatic controls; usually shipped in one or more
sections. (42 U.S.C. 6311(11)(B)) In adopting the EPCA definition for a
``packaged boiler,'' DOE amended the definition to: (1) Include
language to address the various ways in which packaged boilers are
distributed in commerce; and (2) explicitly exclude custom-designed,
field-constructed boilers. 69 FR 61949, 61952. ``Custom-designed,
field-constructed'' boilers were excluded because DOE believed the
statutory standards for ``packaged boilers'' were not intended to apply
to these boiler systems, which generally require alteration, cutting,
drilling, threading, welding or similar tasks by the installer. As a
result, DOE defined a ``packaged boiler'' as a boiler that is shipped
complete with heating equipment, mechanical draft equipment and
automatic controls; usually shipped in one or more sections and does
not include a boiler that is custom designed and field constructed. If
the boiler is shipped in more than one section, the sections may be
produced by more than one manufacturer, and may be originated or
shipped at different times and from more than one location. 10 CFR
431.82.
In this NOPR, DOE wishes to further clarify the differentiation
between field-constructed commercial packaged boilers, which are
excluded from DOE's commercial packaged boiler regulations, and field-
assembled commercial packaged boilers, which are subject to DOE's
regulations. A field-constructed commercial packaged boiler is a
custom-designed commercial packaged boiler that requires welding of
structural components in the field during installation. Specifically,
DOE considers structural components to include heat exchanger sections,
flue tube bundles and internal heat exchanger surfaces, external piping
to one or more heat exchanger sections or locations, and the mechanical
supporting structure the heat exchanger rests upon in the case where a
support structure is not provided with the commercial packaged boiler.
For the purposes of this clarification, welding does not include
attachment using mechanical fasteners or brazing; and any jackets,
shrouds, venting, burner, or burner mounting hardware are not
structural components.
Conversely, a field-assembled commercial packaged boiler can be
assembled in the field without the welding of the structural components
that were previously listed. DOE reiterates that field-assembled
equipment is covered, is required to be tested using the DOE test
procedure, and is required to comply with the applicable energy
conservation standards and certification requirements.
In this NOPR, DOE also proposes to clarify that the field-
constructed exemption pertains to commercial packaged boilers
specifically, not the broader definition of packaged boiler. Therefore,
DOE proposes to remove this exclusionary language from its definition
for ``packaged boiler'' and to incorporate the exclusion for field-
constructed equipment into its definition for commercial packaged
boiler.
DOE seeks comment on its proposed definition for ``field-
constructed'' and this is identified as Issue 3 in section V.E.
C. Testing of Large Commercial Packaged Boilers
In response to the energy conservation standards September 2013
Framework document, Cleaver-Brooks, Burnham, and ABMA stated that for
practical reasons, testing requirements should be limited to boilers
with rated maximum input capacities less than 2,500,000 Btu/h. These
commenters raised concerns regarding the time and expense of testing
larger boilers, and the ability of some independent testing
laboratories and manufacturers to test larger boilers due to heat sink
requirements for the hot water generated. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-
0030, Cleaver-Brooks, No. 12 at p. 1; Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030,
Burnham, No. 15 at p. 2; Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, ABMA, No. 14 at
p. 3) ABMA reiterated these concerns in response to the November 2014
Preliminary Analysis. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, ABMA, No. 33 at
pp. 1-2) Lochinvar, in response to the November 2014 Preliminary
Analysis, stated that alternative efficiency determination method
(AEDM) rules mitigated test burden concerns for large boilers. (Docket
EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, Lochinvar, No. 34 at p. 1)
In response, DOE notes that neither the statutory definition for
``packaged boiler'' at 42 U.S.C. 6311(11)(B) nor the definition for
``commercial packaged boiler'' at 10 CFR 431.82 set an upper limit on
the maximum fuel input rate of covered equipment. The energy
conservation standards for commercial packaged boilers at 10 CFR 431.87
also do not establish any limitations based on the fuel input rate of
equipment. Consequently, commercial packaged boiler models with high
fuel input rates are subject to DOE's existing standards for commercial
packaged boilers, and to establish such a fuel input rate limit for
covered equipment with existing standards would violate the anti-
backsliding provisions of EPCA found at 42 U.S.C. 6313(a)(6)(B)(iii)(I)
for those equipment larger than the limit. Additionally, both BTS-2000
(incorporated by reference in the existing DOE test procedure) and
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 (proposed to be incorporated by reference)
include any commercial packaged boiler with fuel input rate of 300,000
Btu/h or greater.
DOE recognizes the commenters' concerns that it may be difficult to
test thermal efficiency for large commercial packaged boilers and notes
that EPCA requires that test procedures shall not be unduly burdensome
to conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6314(a)(2)) Specifically, DOE recognizes that
large commercial packaged boilers may not be fully assembled until they
are installed at the field site, which may preclude them from being
tested in a laboratory setting. DOE also recognizes that, as the size
of the equipment increases, testing costs incurred to condition the
incoming water and air to the test procedure rating conditions, as well
as management of the hot water generated during testing, also
increases.
In this NOPR, DOE proposes several amendments to the DOE test
procedure in order to provide greater flexibility for testing certain
large commercial packaged boilers and field-assembled commercial
packaged boilers. Specifically, DOE proposes the following provisions:
A field test of combustion efficiency for commercial
packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h;
a calculation method to convert combustion efficiency to
thermal efficiency for steam commercial packaged boilers with fuel
input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h; and
an increase in allowable steam pressure to 15 psi (by
incorporating by reference AHRI Standard 1500-2015).
DOE notes that the continued allowance for the use of an AEDM also
facilitates the ability to ascertain the efficiency of large commercial
packaged boilers. These proposed amendments for providing greater
flexibility in the testing of large commercial packaged boilers are
discussed in the following subsections.
1. Field Tests for Commercial Packaged Boilers
DOE proposes to adopt an optional test method for commercial
packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h
which would allow for: (1) Measuring a steam or hot water commercial
packaged boiler's
[[Page 14647]]
combustion efficiency in the field; and (2) converting the measured
combustion efficiency to thermal efficiency via a calculation method
for steam commercial packaged boilers (discussed in section III.C.2).
DOE understands ``field test'' to mean a combustion efficiency test
that is conducted at the location in which a given commercial packaged
boiler is or will be installed and commissioned for use. DOE
understands that the combustion efficiency test is less burdensome to
conduct on large commercial packaged boilers than the thermal
efficiency test and is more feasible to conduct in the field than the
thermal efficiency test. Specifically, the test setup required for
obtaining the combustion efficiency according to ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 is less involved and requires less instrumentation in the
working fluid stream (flow meters are not required) than the thermal
efficiency test, and involves calculations using primarily the flue gas
temperature and constituents. The combustion efficiency test also
requires less time to run than the thermal efficiency test and
therefore requires less fuel and water, which must be managed and
disposed of as part of the test. DOE believes that allowance for
testing commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rates greater than
5,000,000 Btu/h in the field would reduce the burden associated with
testing this equipment and would mitigate the concerns of interested
parties regarding laboratory limitations. However, DOE notes that
changes to the test procedure are necessary to account for the
following issues associated with testing in the field:
Ambient conditions in the field may be difficult to
control (see section III.E of this NOPR).
Setup requirements of thermal efficiency test (both ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015 and proposed DOE test procedure amendments) may
not be possible to achieve in field (see section III.F of this NOPR).
Maintaining inlet and outlet water temperatures or steam
quality (as applicable) may not be possible in the field (see section
III.D of this NOPR).
Consequently, DOE proposes that the aforementioned requirements for
ambient conditions, certain setup requirements, steam quality, and
inlet and outlet water temperatures not apply for field tests. While
DOE believes such flexibility is necessary to limit burden when testing
large commercial packaged boilers in the field, DOE recognizes that
eliminating these requirements regarding testing conditions may
decrease the accuracy and repeatability of the test. As such, DOE is
proposing that the optional field test only be available for commercial
packaged boilers with fuel input rates greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h,
for which testing in a laboratory setting is difficult, expensive, or
impractical.
To help improve the consistency and repeatability of field tests,
DOE also proposes that manufacturers measure these values (inlet water
temperature, outlet water temperature, ambient relative humidity, and
ambient temperature) and maintain the records of these measurements as
part of the test data underlying the manufacturer's compliance
certification in accordance with the requirements in 10 CFR 429.71. If
a manufacturer elects to use the field test option in the test
procedure, the manufacturer would also be required to report that the
rated efficiency is based on a field test.
Since DOE proposes this optional methodology primarily to
accommodate commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater
than 5,000,000 Btu/h, DOE proposes to allow certification based on a
sample size of one for manufacturers utilizing the field test and
conversion methodology. DOE has never intended that a manufacturer
build more than one unit solely for the purposes of testing and
clarified this during the Commercial Certification Working Group
meetings (Docket No. EERE-2013-BT-NOC-0023). Additionally, 10 CFR
429.12(a) requires that certification of equipment occur before
distribution in commerce. With respect to commercial packaged boilers
that are not field assembled, distribution in commerce would be
determined, similar to other covered equipment, using the factors
specified in the certification, compliance, and enforcement final rule
published on March 7, 2011. 76 FR 12422, 12426-12427. Any field tested
basic model of a commercial packaged boiler that has not been
previously certified through testing or an AEDM would be required to be
certified by the manufacturer to DOE within 15 days of commissioning.
(Note: by ``commissioning,'' DOE means adapting the boiler operating
conditions and parameters to those required for the building space
heating load.) DOE proposes to adopt this exception in recognition of
the high test burden and practical limitations of testing these boilers
prior to distributing them in commerce; however, DOE notes that, if the
field test demonstrates that the unit does not meet the applicable
standard, then the manufacturer would have to decommission the unit
until it can be modified and retested to demonstrate compliance with
the standard. Failure to decommission the unit immediately (i.e.,
allowing the unit to be used during any time period while the unit is
being redesigned, parts are being built or ordered, etc. to make the
unit compliant) would constitute a violation of the standards and the
certification requirements. DOE also notes that, when a single unit is
tested, there is no tolerance on the performance; the tested unit must
meet the standard.
Since commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rates greater
than 5,000,000 Btu/h would not be easily transported between
manufacturer, laboratory, and consumer facilities, DOE also proposes
that, at its discretion, assessment and enforcement testing of
commissioned units could also be conducted as field tests. The location
at which the enforcement field test is performed may or may not be the
same location at which the manufacturer conducted its field test. DOE
recognizes that a field test could not meet the existing laboratory
accreditation requirements found at 10 CFR 429.110(a)(3) and there
proposes an exception in this section specifically for field tests of
commercial packaged boilers.
DOE seeks comments on the following issues, and these are also
listed in section V.E:
The feasibility of conducting a combustion efficiency test
in the field for steam and hot water commercial packaged boilers with
fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h (Issue 4).
Whether the thermal efficiency test can be conducted for
steam commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than
2,500,000 Btu/h and less than or equal to 5,000,000 Btu/h (Issue 5).
The specific limitations, if any, that preclude combustion
efficiency testing in a laboratory setting for steam commercial
packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 2,500,000 Btu/h and
less than or equal to 5,000,000 Btu/h (Issue 6).
The specific additional equipment or facilities and their
associated cost that would be required to accommodate testing
commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 2,500,000
Btu/h and less than or equal to 5,000,000 Btu/h in a laboratory setting
(Issue 7).
Whether the 5,000,000 Btu/h fuel input rate is an adequate
threshold for the allowance of the field combustion test and conversion
methodology, and if not, what threshold should be used (Issue 8).
Whether certification should be permitted for field tested
units after distribution in commerce and after
[[Page 14648]]
commissioning, in particular the impact of this approach on building
inspectors (Issue 9).
2. Method To Convert Combustion Efficiency to Thermal Efficiency for
Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers
DOE also proposes a method for converting the combustion efficiency
of a steam commercial packaged boiler to thermal efficiency. Such a
conversion would be necessary for steam commercial packaged boilers
because the efficiency metric for this equipment at 10 CFR 431.86 is
thermal efficiency. DOE proposes this conversion method only for those
steam commercial packaged boilers with a fuel input rate greater than
5,000,000 Btu/h based on the concerns presented in section III.C. This
conversion methodology would be available to manufacturers or
laboratories to perform a combustion efficiency test in a laboratory
setting or as a field test as described in III.C.1.
The proposed conversion method calculates thermal efficiency by
subtracting a constant value from the combustion efficiency, which must
be measured in accordance with ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. Thermal
efficiency includes heat exchanger effectiveness and jacket losses
which are not captured in the combustion efficiency. The constant value
subtracted from the tested combustion efficiency value represents those
additional losses. In order to determine such a value, DOE analyzed the
AHRI directory (as of January 2015).\10\ DOE looked at the difference
between rated combustion and thermal efficiency for all steam
commercial packaged boilers with rated input larger than 5,000,000 Btu/
h. DOE found 52 basic models of steam commercial packaged boilers with
a rated input larger than 5,000,000 Btu/h and the difference between
rated combustion and thermal efficiency ranged between 0.5 percent and
2.0 percent. Based on these values, DOE proposes subtracting 2.0
percent from the measured combustion efficiency of steam commercial
packaged boilers with fuel input rating 5,000,000 Btu/h or greater in
order to calculate a rated thermal efficiency. DOE believes that
subtracting 2.0 percent from the measured combustion efficiency
determined during the field test would result in conservative thermal
efficiency ratings of models, thereby encouraging manufacturers to
conduct thermal efficiency tests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Available at: https://www.ahridirectory.org/ahridirectory/pages/home.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturers must use the certified rating for any representation
of efficiency no matter which methodology is used. That is, for
equipment certified under the calculation procedure, any
representations of the energy efficiency must be made based on the
calculated value and any equipment certified using the tested value of
thermal efficiency must be made based on the results of that testing.
DOE seeks comments on the following issues, which are also listed
in section V.E:
The proposed conversion method for calculating thermal
efficiency based on measured combustion efficiency for steam commercial
packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h
(Issue 10);
The proposed value for the difference between the
combustion efficiency and thermal efficiency in the conversion method
(proposed value of 2.0 percent of the combustion efficiency), whether
the value would result in conservative ratings, and what number DOE
should use instead if the proposed value is not adequate (Issue 11);
Whether the 5,000,000 Btu/h fuel input rate is an adequate
threshold for the allowance of the field test (for combustion
efficiency) and/or conversion methodology, and if not, what threshold
should be used (Issue 12); and
If the field test (for hot water and steam commercial
packaged boilers) and conversion methodologies (for steam commercial
packaged boilers) do not adequately accommodate commercial packaged
boilers with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h, what
procedure should DOE implement in order to do so (Issue 13).
3. Alternative Efficiency Determination Methods
The provisions under 10 CFR 429.70 provide for alternative methods
for determining energy efficiency and energy use of certain equipment,
including commercial packaged boilers. An AEDM must first be validated
for a particular validation class in accordance with the requirements
of 10 CFR 429.70(c) using the applicable test procedure (e.g., the test
procedure under 10 CFR 431.86 for commercial packaged boilers). For
each validation class of commercial packaged boilers, at least two (2)
distinct basic models must be tested in order to validate the AEDM
before using the AEDM to predict the fuel input rate or efficiency of a
commercial packaged boiler. 10 CFR 429.70(c)(2)(iv). Such a test may be
performed on any individual models in a validation class that meet or
exceed the current applicable Federal energy conservation standard,
regardless of size. As noted by Lochinvar in response to the November
2014 Preliminary Analysis, the AEDM process mitigates test burden
concerns for large commercial packaged boilers. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-
STD-0030, Lochinvar, No. 34 at p. 1)
However, in light of DOE's proposal to allow field tests for
commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rates than 5,000,000 Btu/h
(described in section III.C.1), DOE proposes to limit the cases in
which field tests may be used for AEDM validation pursuant to 10 CFR
429.70(c)(2). Specifically, DOE proposes that AEDMs validated using
data derived from field tests may only be used to rate commercial
packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h. As
discussed in section III.C.1, DOE proposes a field test option for
commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rates greater than
5,000,000 Btu/h that disregards certain testing requirements, measures
combustion efficiency, and applies a calculation method to convert
combustion efficiency to thermal efficiency (for steam commercial
packaged boilers). While this field test option reduces testing burden,
it also leads to more variability and uncertainty in the test results.
As such, DOE believes that the proposed allowances for field tests of
commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000
Btu/h would not provide sufficient validation of an AEDM for use on
smaller units that must undergo laboratory tests. Therefore, DOE
proposes that AEDMs validated based on field test data may only be used
for commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rates greater than
5,000,000 Btu/h. Laboratory tests of commercial packaged boilers of any
size (i.e., not field tested) can continue to be used to validate an
AEDM that is used to rate commercial packaged boilers of any size,
including those with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h.
4. Steam Commercial Packaged Boiler Operating Pressure
Section 8.6.1 of BTS-2000 provides that tests may be made at
atmospheric pressure or at pressure not exceeding 2 psi gauge, and
section 8.6.3 of BTS-2000 requires that the moisture in steam not
exceed 2 percent of the water fed to the commercial packaged boiler
during the test. These provisions are incorporated by reference in the
existing DOE test procedure for commercial packaged boilers. DOE
solicited public comments on test pressure and steam moisture content
in the September 2013 Framework document; during the October 1, 2013
energy conservation
[[Page 14649]]
standards Framework document public meeting; and in the February 2014
RFI. In particular, DOE requested comments about (1) the appropriate
steam pressure for steam commercial packaged boilers operating at full
load, (2) the effect of different steam pressures on steady-state
efficiency (thermal or combustion), and (3) the impacts of the steam
pressure testing requirements on the amount of water carryover and the
system operation.
ABMA expressed concern that the steam pressure requirements in BTS-
2000 may be suitable for certain boilers but not for some larger-
capacity models. For example, ABMA indicated that a fire-tube boiler
cannot operate successfully at 2 psig steam pressure. Instead, ABMA
argued that a fire-tube boiler should be operated at 10 to 12 psig
steam pressure to achieve acceptable steam quality. (Docket EERE-2013-
BT-STD-0030, ABMA, No. 13 at p. 31) ABMA also commented that while
steam pressure not greater than 0-2 psig has been adequate for the
majority of boilers, the 0-2 psig test pressure is unrealistic for
larger-capacity steam boilers, as it causes high steam velocity at the
steam/water interface and the steam outlet nozzle, which results in
excessive water entrainment and carryover (i.e., poor steam quality).
(Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, ABMA, No. 14 at p. 2) Cleaver-Brooks
commented that it cannot test its steam boilers at such low operating
pressures because its boilers are designed to operate near or at 10
psig. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, Cleaver-Brooks, No. 12 at p. 1)
Burnham encouraged DOE to raise the limit of the required steam test
pressure to give manufacturers flexibility for equipment designed to
operate at pressures above 2 psig. (Docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006,
Burnham, No. 4 at p. 2) AHRI opined that an alternative steam pressure
requirement may have an effect on the steady-state measurement, but
that such change would be minimal. (Docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006, AHRI,
No. 6 at p. 2)
DOE notes that it has also received several requests for test
procedure waivers, citing the inability to simultaneously meet the
maximum steam pressure requirement (of between 0 and 2 psig) and the
steam moisture requirement (of less than or equal to 2 percent
moisture). Based on the public comments and the waiver requests DOE has
received to date, DOE understands that larger commercial packaged
boilers are designed for operating pressures greater than 2 psig and
have difficulty being tested in accordance with the DOE existing test
procedure for commercial packaged boilers; that is, at a pressure not
exceeding 2 psig and also not exceeding 2 percent moisture in the
produced steam.
DOE notes that, to accommodate testing of these commercial packaged
boilers, section 5.3.6 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 requires that
tests shall be made at atmospheric pressure or at the pressure required
to comply with Section 5.3.7 [of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015], not
exceeding 15 psi gauge. Therefore, DOE recognizes that amending 10 CFR
431.86 to replace BTS-2000 with ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 would
permit steam operating pressures up to but not exceeding 15 psig and
therefore resolve the issues associated with testing large commercial
packaged boilers designed to operate at higher pressures. DOE does not
anticipate this change would have an effect on measured efficiency
ratings because it is being made to accommodate only certain large
commercial packaged boilers that manufacturers have claimed cannot be
tested under the existing DOE test procedure and for which
manufacturers submitted waiver requests under 10 CFR 431.401.
DOE also notes that ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 allows for any
steam pressure from 0-15 psig to be used for testing. However, DOE
believes that it is important to maintain consistency and repeatability
within the CPB test procedure and subsequent ratings. Therefore, DOE
proposes that only those commercial packaged boilers that cannot
operate at a steam pressure below 2 psig would be able to apply such a
provision in order to also meet the steam quality requirement. However,
DOE recognizes that, theoretically, variation in steam pressure would
result in changes in both thermal and combustion efficiency. Therefore,
to ensure commercial packaged boilers that cannot be tested at the
prescribed 0-2 psig steam pressure are tested in a consistent manner,
DOE proposes that such equipment be tested at the steam pressure
closest to 2 psig that it can maintain while also maintaining the
requirement of less than 2 percent moisture in the steam, not exceeding
15 psig. DOE notes that a manufacturer may need to incrementally
increase steam test pressure above atmospheric pressure or the 2 psig
requirement to meet the moisture requirement, thereby maintaining steam
quality. DOE is not aware of any commercial packaged boilers that would
require higher operating pressures than 15 psig to maintain the steam
quality requirements.
DOE seeks comments, data, and information about pressures
recommended by manufacturers and relevance to actual operating
conditions in buildings. This is identified as Issue 14 in section V.E.
DOE also seeks comment on whether DOE should require testing to be
performed at the lowest possible steam pressure where steam quality
requirements can be met. This is identified as Issue 15 in section V.E.
DOE also requests comment on if there are any commercial packaged
boilers that require steam pressures greater than 15 psig to maintain 2
percent moisture in the produced steam. This is identified as Issue 16
in section V.E.
D. Hot Water Commercial Packaged Boiler Operating Temperatures
In the energy conservation standards September 2013 Framework
document, the February 2014 RFI, and the November 2014 Preliminary
Analysis DOE requested comments, data, and information about the
appropriate inlet and outlet water temperatures for part-load and full-
load testing conditions of hot water commercial packaged boilers, and
information about how these equipment are currently tested. Issues
pertaining to the inlet water temperature and the temperature rise
required by the test procedure were also raised during the public
meeting regarding the energy conservation standards September 2013
Framework document. In addition to the comments solicited in response
to the September 2013 Framework document, February 2014 RFI, and the
November 2014 Preliminary Analysis; DOE conducted confidential
manufacturer interviews as part of the energy conservation standards
rulemaking process for commercial packaged boilers (manufacturer
interviews), during which manufacturers also discussed issues regarding
the commercial packaged boiler test procedure. In the subsequent
sections, DOE discusses the existing requirements regarding hot water
temperatures, issues identified by interested parties, proposed changes
to the hot water temperature requirements, and potential impacts of
those proposed changes.
1. Existing Requirements
The existing DOE test procedure for commercial packaged boilers
incorporates by reference BTS-2000 which includes test requirements for
inlet and outlet water temperatures for non-condensing and condensing
commercial packaged boilers. For a non-condensing commercial packaged
boiler, section 8.5.1.1 of BTS-2000 requires inlet water temperature to
be
[[Page 14650]]
between 35[emsp14][deg]F and 80[emsp14][deg]F (at Point A in Figure
III.1), and outlet water temperature to be 180[emsp14][deg]F 2[emsp14][deg]F (at Point C in Figure III.1). For a condensing
commercial packaged boiler, section 8.5.1.2 of BTS-2000 requires inlet
water temperature to be 80[emsp14][deg]F 5[emsp14][deg]F
(at Point A in Figure III.1 and outlet water temperature to be
180[emsp14][deg]F 2[emsp14][deg]F (at Point C in Figure
III.1). These temperature requirements are consistent with those in
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. Specifically, Figure III.1 (taken from
Figure C9 in ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015) identifies the location of
the measurement of the inlet water temperature (Point A:
TIN) and the outlet water temperature (Point C:
TOUT).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17MR16.001
The difference between the inlet and outlet water temperatures
describes the temperature rise across the commercial packaged boiler.
BTS-2000 also includes an allowance in section 8.5.1.1.1 for tubular
commercial packaged boilers to use a recirculating loop, which reduces
the temperature rise across the commercial packaged boiler itself
(Point B to Point C), while maintaining the inlet water temperature
requirements specified in the DOE test procedure as measured at Point
A. That is, in cases where a recirculating loop is used, BTS-2000
requires that the temperature requirements described previously must
still be met at Point A in Figure III.1 prior to mixing with the warmer
recirculating loop water. BTS-2000 (and ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 at
section 5.3.5.3) also limits the temperature rise between Point B and
Point C to not less than 20[emsp14][deg]F for commercial packaged
boilers tested using a recirculating loop. ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015
expands the allowable use of a recirculating loop to all commercial
packaged boilers in section 5.3.5.3, where previously it was allowed
for commercial packaged boilers with tubular heat exchangers only.
The measurements of inlet and outlet water temperature at Points A
and C are used in Equation 1 to calculate the amount of energy
transferred into the heated water, as described by item C7.2.11.3 in
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 (also in 11.1.11.3 of BTS-2000). This
equation is given by
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17MR16.002
where QS is the rate of heat transferred in Btu/h, W is the
weight of heated water in pounds (lb) measured during the test,
CP,H2O is the specific heat of water in Btu/lb/[deg]F,
TOUT is the outlet water temperature at Point C ([deg]F),
TIN is the inlet water temperature at Point A ([deg]F), and
tT is the test duration in hours.
In general, the efficiency of a commercial packaged boiler is
proportional to the amount of water heated and the amount of heat
energy added to this amount of water. As shown in Equation 1, the
amount of heat energy transferred is proportional to the product of the
weight of the water fed (W) and the temperature rise across the
commercial packaged boiler (TOUT-TIN). The
efficiency is therefore dependent on the inlet water temperature,
whereby lower inlet temperatures result in greater amounts of heat
energy transferred and therefore higher thermal efficiencies. As the
energy from the flue gases is only transferred to the hot water in the
heat exchanger, the first law of thermodynamics establishes a lower
limit on the temperature the flue gas can achieve, which is the lowest
water temperature within the commercial packaged boiler. Therefore as
the inlet water temperature is reduced, more energy may be extracted
from the combustion gases, resulting in potentially higher efficiency.
These conditions hold true for both non-condensing and condensing
commercial packaged boilers.
[[Page 14651]]
2. Issues With Water Temperature Requirements and Proposed Changes
Through the October 2013 Framework document, February 2014 RFI, the
November 2014 Preliminary Analysis, manufacturer interviews, and a
review of the existing DOE test procedure, DOE identified the following
concerns regarding its existing water temperature requirements for
commercial packaged boilers:
The current temperature rise is unrepresentative of actual
operating conditions.
The current temperature rise may induce excessive stresses
on some commercial packaged boilers.
The presence of recirculating loops during testing leads
to significant variability in the actual temperature rise across the
commercial packaged boiler (Point B to Point C in Figure III.1).
These issues are discussed in detail in this section.
During the manufacturer interviews, a number of manufacturers
indicated that the 100[emsp14][deg]F temperature rise in BTS-2000 (for
both condensing or non-condensing commercial packaged boilers) was
unrepresentative of real-world conditions, and instead indicated that
commercial packaged boilers are typically designed for a
20[emsp14][deg]F to 40[emsp14][deg]F temperature rise. These
manufacturers suggested that testing with a 20[emsp14][deg]F to
40[emsp14][deg]F temperature rise would better reflect conditions found
in typical building applications. DOE understands this to mean the
actual temperature rise across the commercial packaged boiler itself
(i.e., between Point B and Point C in Figure III.1).
During the public meeting regarding the September 2013 energy
conservation standards Framework document, ACEEE asserted that a
100[emsp14][deg]F temperature rise is an inadequate way to characterize
modern boilers, does not provide sufficient information about
performance of a boiler with a 20[emsp14][deg]F temperature rise
between inlet and outlet water temperature at part-load conditions, and
is essentially irrelevant for comparing efficiencies among a range of
boiler sizes. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, ACEEE, No. 13 at pp. 20,
36) In later comments, ACEEE recommended a 20[emsp14][deg]F temperature
rise, arguing that it is within the range of the most common
temperature rise and provides the most conservative value for full-
load, steady-state efficiency. ACEEE also commented that a manufacturer
should be able to publish ``application ratings'' (informational
ratings obtained at different operating conditions) for different
temperature rise values. In addition, whether for a fixed capacity or
modulating boiler, ACEEE observed that the lower inlet water
temperatures result in higher efficiencies, and ACEEE stated its
understanding that almost all the efficiency gain is due to the release
of latent energy at inlet water temperatures less than
140[emsp14][deg]F. ACEEE then suggested that a commercial packaged
boiler should be rated at the lowest inlet water temperature that
remains under the manufacturer's warranty for continuous service,
whether for a fixed capacity or modulating boiler. (Docket EERE-2014-
BT-TP-0006, ACEEE, No. 2 at p. 2.)
A joint comment from ACEEE, ASAP, and NRDC suggested that the
existing DOE test procedure for commercial packaged boilers is obsolete
because it obscures the annual energy savings potential of condensing
boilers in commercial building applications. BTS-2000 measures
efficiency at peak load, using a minimum 100[emsp14][deg]F temperature
rise between inlet and outlet (note: BTS-2000 defines inlet temperature
at a location preceding the reentry of any recirculating loop water),
and requires 180[emsp14][deg]F outlet temperature. (This continues to
be the case in ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.) However, the commenters
argued that the existing test procedure does not consider condensing
boilers that can operate at part load with greater efficiency if the
system design allows for inlet water at condensing temperatures
(<140[emsp14][deg]F). (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, Joint Advocates,
No. 16 at p. 2)
In response to the November 2014 Preliminary Analysis, Raypak
suggested that the wide range in allowable inlet water temperatures in
BTS-2000 is to accommodate the wide range of ground water temperatures
throughout the year. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, Raypak, No. 35 at
p. 3)
ABMA expressed concerns on behalf of its members that (1) water
temperatures required by BTS-2000 are obsolete or do not represent
installed boilers; (2) the temperature rise resulting from the required
inlet and outlet water temperatures set forth in BTS-2000 can place
excessive stress on the boiler pressure vessel, thereby leading to
shorter boiler life; and (3) the considerable cost of testing larger
boilers could approach $1 million. ABMA added that test pressures and
temperatures should be more realistic in terms of normal system
operating conditions and that an appropriate inlet temperature would be
140[emsp14][deg]F or the manufacturer's recommended minimum. (Docket
EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, ABMA, No. 14 at p. 1-3) DOE notes that these
concerns continue to apply to ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 since these
temperatures are the same as those found in BTS-2000.
Cleaver-Brooks stated that BTS-2000 specifies an outlet temperature
of 180[emsp14][deg]F and an inlet water temperature of 38[emsp14][deg]F
[sic] to 80[emsp14][deg]F for non-condensing boilers. (Note: BTS-2000
prescribes an inlet water temperature of 35[emsp14][deg]F.) Instead,
for much of its equipment, Cleaver-Brooks stated that it specifies a
minimum inlet water temperature of 140[emsp14][deg]F to reduce damage
from thermally induced stresses. Cleaver-Brooks asserted that neither
the required steam nor the hot water test conditions set forth in the
existing DOE test procedure for commercial packaged boilers reflect
actual conditions in buildings, and that test conditions overestimate
boiler efficiency compared to what an end-user would be expected to
experience in actual applications. The commenter suggested modifying
the test procedure to require an outlet water temperature of
180[emsp14][deg]F and an inlet water temperature of 140[emsp14][deg]F
or, at a minimum, to allow such test conditions as an alternative.
(Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, Cleaver-Brooks, No. 12 at p. 1) Again,
DOE notes that these concerns also apply to ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015, as the standard maintains the same inlet and outlet water
temperature requirements as BTS-2000. DOE also believes that the inlet
water temperatures described by Cleaver-Brooks and ABMA are intended to
mean the inlet water temperature in the absence of a recirculating
loop. As noted earlier, the existing DOE test procedure (section
8.5.1.1.1 of BTS-2000) allows for the use of a recirculating loop for
tubular commercial packaged boilers, thereby increasing the inlet water
temperature seen by the commercial packaged boiler (shown as Point B in
Figure III.1) and reducing the actual temperature rise across the
commercial packaged boiler.
Similarly, Lochinvar stated in response to the November 2014
Preliminary Analysis that the allowance in BTS-2000 for a recirculation
loop in some instances would result in higher water temperature going
into the commercial packaged boiler. Lochinvar noted that efficiency
curves that present the efficiency of a commercial packaged boiler as a
function of return (inlet) water temperature (and are sometimes
provided in marketing literature) are not based on the methodology of
BTS-2000. Lochinvar further recommended that DOE not attempt to correct
the efficiency of commercial packaged boilers for inlet water
temperature. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, No. 34 at p. 3)
In order to address the issues presented in section III.D.2, DOE
[[Page 14652]]
proposes amendments to the inlet and outlet water temperatures for both
condensing and non-condensing commercial packaged boilers. Upon
consideration of the above comments about inlet and outlet water
temperatures; review of commercial packaged boiler manufacturer
literature; and consideration of results of testing of commercial
packaged boilers at temperatures that, according to commercial packaged
boiler manufacturers, would reflect normal system operating conditions;
DOE agrees with interested parties that a 100[emsp14][deg]F to
145[emsp14][deg]F nominal temperature rise does not necessarily reflect
conditions typically associated with installed non-condensing or
condensing commercial packaged boilers.
Further, DOE acknowledges that the presence of recirculating loops
in testing obscures the actual inlet water temperature entering the
commercial packaged boiler at Point B in Figure III.1 (and therefore
the actual temperature rise experienced by the commercial packaged
boiler) because the inlet water temperature is measured and maintained
at Point A only, under the existing procedure. Specifically, DOE
observed that, based on the permissible inlet and outlet temperatures,
the tolerances on those temperatures, and the use of recirculating
loops, the temperature rises between Point B and Point C in Figure
III.1 allowable by both BTS-2000 and ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 can
range from 20[emsp14][deg]F to 147[emsp14][deg]F for non-condensing
commercial packaged boilers (section 8.5.1.1 of BTS 2000 and section
5.3.5.1 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015) and 20[emsp14][deg]F to
107[emsp14][deg]F for condensing commercial packaged boilers (section
8.5.1.2 of BTS 2000 and section 5.3.5.2 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015). (Note: the minimum temperature rise of 20[emsp14][deg]F across
the commercial packaged boiler assumes that recirculating loops are
currently being used for these tests.) DOE notes that such variability
has the potential to yield variability in tested combustion efficiency
and thermal efficiency ratings.
Accordingly, to improve the consistency and repeatability of the
DOE test procedure, DOE proposes to revise the hot water temperature
requirements to require the inlet water temperature to be
140[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F for non-condensing
equipment, as determined at Point B (see Figure III.1). For non-
condensing equipment, DOE is maintaining the outlet temperature of
180[emsp14][deg]F but is specifying a new tolerance for this
measurement, which is discussed further in section III.D.3). Similarly,
DOE proposes to require an outlet water temperature of
120[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F for condensing equipment,
as determined at Point C (see Figure III.1). For condensing equipment,
DOE is proposing an inlet water temperature specification of
80[emsp14][deg]F as measured at Point B in Figure III.1 and updating
the measurement tolerance to 1[emsp14][deg]F, as discussed
section III.D.3. DOE believes these test temperatures will more
accurately represent the energy efficiency of commercial packaged
boilers and are more consistent with the conditions typically observed
in field installations. DOE also notes that the proposed temperature
requirements result in equivalent temperature rises across the
commercial packaged boiler for condensing and non-condensing equipment
in order to maintain comparability. The proposed temperature
requirements also incorporate inlet water temperatures that more
accurately represent the efficiencies of non-condensing and condensing
commercial packaged boilers. DOE does not believe that maintaining the
same outlet water temperature for non-condensing and condensing
commercial packaged boilers is important for maintaining comparability
of ratings.
DOE is proposing to modify the location at which the inlet water
temperature is maintained from Point A to Point B, which is immediately
preceding the commercial packaged boiler, downstream of the
recirculation loop (see Figure III.1). DOE believes that the comments
of interested parties refer to the temperature rise experienced across
the commercial packaged boiler itself (Point B to Point C) and that,
therefore, DOE's proposal is consistent with the input of interested
parties. In addition, DOE notes that specifying the inlet water
temperature at Point B, immediately prior to entering the commercial
packaged boiler would remove ambiguity and improve the consistency and
repeatability of the DOE test procedure. This temperature is more
directly related to the measured thermal or combustion efficiency than
the temperature rise determined with the inlet water upstream of the
recirculation loop (between Point C and Point A of Figure III.1).
DOE recognizes that these inlet temperatures would typically be
produced through the use of a recirculating loop to temper incoming
feedwater to the appropriate inlet temperature. In proposing to adopt
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, DOE is proposing to allow recirculation
loops to be used on all commercial packaged boilers and, as such, DOE
clarifies that recirculation loops could be used to meet the new
proposed inlet water requirements. However, DOE proposes that the
efficiency calculations in section C7.2.11.3 in ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 would continue to use the water temperature and flow rate
measured upstream of the recirculating loop, if present (Point A in
Figure III.1). DOE acknowledges that this would require measurements of
water temperature at both Point A and Point B for equipment tested with
recirculating loops. However, DOE notes that by continuing to use the
temperature at Point A in the calculation of thermal efficiency, the
precision of the resulting thermal efficiency will not be impacted as
compared to the current methodology.
While DOE believes that the proposed inlet and outlet temperature
requirements are applicable and representative for the majority of
commercial packaged boilers available on the market, DOE is aware that
some commercial packaged boilers are unable to operate at a temperature
rise across the commercial packaged boiler of 40[emsp14][deg]F.
Specifically, DOE is aware that some commercial packaged boilers are
only capable of operating with lower temperature differentials, such as
20[emsp14][deg]F. As such, DOE is proposing to adopt provisions for
commercial packaged boilers that cannot operate with a temperature rise
of 40[emsp14][deg]F across the boiler (Point B to Point C), as
indicated in the manufacturer literature. For non-condensing commercial
packaged boilers, DOE is proposing that, if the commercial packaged
boiler cannot operate with an inlet temperature of 140[emsp14][deg]F
1[emsp14][deg]F at Point B in Figure III.1 when the outlet
temperature is 180[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F, DOE is
proposing that the inlet temperature be maintained as close to
140[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F as possible, consistent
with manufacturer's instructions provided in the literature for that
basic model and that the average inlet water temperature measured at
Point B in Figure III.1 be reported as part of the certification report
for the basic model. Similarly, for condensing commercial packaged
boilers that cannot operate with a temperature rise of 40[emsp14][deg]F
across the commercial packaged boiler, DOE is proposing that the inlet
temperature at Point B in Figure III.1 be maintained as close to
80[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F as possible, consistent
with manufacturer's instructions provided in the literature for that
basic model, while the outlet temperature is maintained at
120[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F, consistent with the DOE
test procedure. Again, the average inlet water temperature measured at
Point B in Figure III.1 would be reported as part
[[Page 14653]]
of the certification report for the basic model
DOE seeks comments, data, and information about whether the
proposed testing conditions related to water temperatures are
appropriate both for a non-condensing commercial packaged boiler and a
condensing commercial packaged boiler. This is identified as Issue 17
in Section V.E.
DOE also requests comment on the proposed test provisions to
accommodate commercial packaged boilers that cannot be tested with a
temperature rise of 40[emsp14][deg]F across the commercial packaged
boiler (Point B to Point C). This is identified as Issue 18 in Section
V.E.
Under EPCA, DOE is required to determine what impacts, if any, its
amendments to a test procedure will have on ratings. (42 U.S.C.
6293(e); 42 U.S.C. 6314(a)(4)(C)) DOE proposes using the temperature
rise across the commercial packaged boiler itself as described in order
to improve the repeatability of the tests. Whereas the existing test
procedure (using BTS-2000, incorporated by reference) allows for a wide
range of temperature rises across the commercial packaged boiler due to
the allowance of recirculating loops and a measurement location
upstream of the recirculation loop, which obscures the actual
temperature rise across the commercial packaged boiler, DOE's proposed
amendments would remove ambiguity by standardizing this temperature
rise across all commercial packaged boilers where possible. DOE notes
that the effect on any individual commercial packaged boiler could be
to slightly increase or slightly decrease measured efficiency,
depending on how the test was previously performed. Further, based on
discussions with manufacturers, DOE believes that testing is already
performed using a recirculating loop for equipment that does not
utilize a tubular heat exchanger in order to prevent damaging the
equipment and provide the boiler with inlet water temperatures more
representative of typical field conditions. Therefore, in combination
with the other proposed amendments to the test procedure, DOE has
tentatively determined that the proposed amendments, in aggregate,
would not result in an overall measurable impact on ratings.
3. Allowable Uncertainty in Water Temperature Measurement
HTP initially expressed concern about several operating conditions
being either unspecified or unrealistic, and suggested updated test
parameters for commercial packaged boilers that would be more
reasonable. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, HTP, No. 18 at p.4) However,
in later comments and after further analysis, HTP concluded that the
test conditions should not be amended because manufacturers cannot be
confident that the DOE test method would maintain an acceptable level
of uncertainty if different test points or temperature rises were to be
used. Instead, HTP commented that an acceptable test method uncertainty
analysis should be completed to verify the Appliance Standards and
Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC) agreed-upon 5-percent
allowable tolerance on ratings in order to account for variations in
manufacturing and testing. (Docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006, HTP, No. 5 at
p. 4)
In response to HTP's concerns regarding the uncertainty of the
test, DOE proposes to reduce the tolerances for inlet and outlet water
temperatures during the test period to 1[emsp14][deg]F for
both non-condensing and condensing commercial packaged boilers so that
testing uncertainties are not increased. DOE notes that the required
minimum accuracy of the inlet and outlet water temperature measurement
instrumentation is 0.2[emsp14][deg]F (Table C1 of ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015 and Table 1 of BTS-2000). Therefore, the
instrumentation required by the test procedure is sufficiently precise
to accommodate this tolerance. Investigative testing performed by DOE
showed that reducing the temperature rise did not substantially
increase the variability in thermal efficiency between repeated tests
compared to the expected variability of the currently allowable
temperature rises. Furthermore, a review of the data obtained during
investigative testing showed little variation over time in the
temperatures themselves, typically less than 1[emsp14][deg]F over the course of the test. DOE seeks additional
comments, data, and analysis concerning thermal efficiency test
measurement uncertainty. This is identified as Issue 19 in section V.E.
4. Water Flow Rate During Testing
Burnham and AHRI observed that a change in the specified water
temperatures would potentially change the water flow rate and the
calculated efficiency resulting from the test procedure. Higher flow
rates and a resulting higher total volume of water are necessary to
achieve smaller temperature rises. According to the commenters,
decreasing the temperature rise would require a higher water flow rate
and may exceed the water handling, cooling, processing, and disposal
capabilities of many laboratories currently testing using the existing
DOE test procedure (i.e., BTS-2000). Further, the commenters argued
that reducing the temperature rise by lowering the outlet temperature
may result in increased measured thermal efficiency. In view of these
concerns, both AHRI and Burnham recommended that the current operating
temperatures should be retained. (Docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006, Burnham,
No. 4 at p. 2; Docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006, AHRI, No. 6 at p. 2)
DOE is aware that the water temperature rise across the commercial
packaged boiler is inversely related to the flow rate of the working
fluid (water or steam) at a given burner fuel input rate, and that
increasing water flow rates to achieve lower temperature rises may
reduce the commercial packaged boiler size that laboratories are
capable of testing. However, as stated previously, DOE also
acknowledges that, under the proposed test procedure, recirculating
loops, which reduce the temperature rise across the commercial packaged
boiler with modest flow rates of incoming feedwater and outgoing water
for disposal, would be allowed for all commercial packaged boilers, not
just commercial packaged boilers with tubular heat exchangers as is
currently allowed in section 8.5.1.1.1 of BTS-2000. This is supported
by Lochinvar's assertion that recirculating loops are used in testing
and increase the inlet water temperature to the commercial packaged
boiler. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, No. 34 at p. 3) In addition, DOE
notes that the 100[emsp14][deg]F temperature rise required by both BTS-
2000 and ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 is not directly comparable to
DOE's proposed temperature rise of 40[emsp14][deg]F due to the
difference in where the inlet temperature requirement is measured.
DOE believes that requiring the temperature to be measured and
maintained at the location downstream of the recirculation loop and
just prior to the commercial packaged boiler inlet would allow
manufacturers and laboratories to continue using incoming water at much
lower temperatures (at or near the current 35[emsp14][deg]F to
80[emsp14][deg]F of BTS-2000 and ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015). That
is, under these proposed inlet and outlet temperature conditions (when
utilizing a recirculation loop), the same temperatures and test
conditions could be established under the existing and new test
procedures (due to the different measurement locations). DOE therefore
believes that the concerns regarding an increase in water flow rate
[[Page 14654]]
(and therefore reduction in laboratory capacity) may be overstated in
view of the proposed change in location of where the inlet water
temperature would be measured under the proposed test procedure.
DOE seeks comment regarding the prevalence of using recirculating
loops in testing; specifically, DOE requests comment about the kinds of
commercial packaged boilers utilizing recirculation loops during
testing and the conditions at which these commercial packaged boilers
and recirculating loops operate. This is identified as Issue 20 in
section V.E.
DOE estimates the impact on manufacturers of requiring higher water
flow rates in section IV.B. DOE seeks further comments, data, and
information concerning the capabilities of test laboratories,
particularly in light of the specific proposed conditions contained in
this NOPR. This is identified as Issue 21 in section V.E.
E. Testing Conditions
For non-condensing commercial packaged boilers, the existing DOE
test procedure does not prescribe test room requirements for ambient
temperature or humidity. For combustion efficiency tests of condensing
commercial packaged boilers, the existing DOE test procedure requires
that the ``humidity of the room shall at no time exceed 80 percent.''
10 CFR 431.86(c)(2)(ii). Additionally, BTS-2000 requires that test air
temperature, as measured at the burner inlet, be within 5[emsp14][deg]F of the ambient temperature, where ambient
temperature is measured within 6 feet of the front of the unit at mid-
height. ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 prescribes an allowable ambient
temperature during the test between 30[emsp14][deg]F and
100[emsp14][deg]F (section 5.3.8) with the relative humidity not
exceeding 80 percent in the test room or chamber (section 5.3.9).
Section C3.6 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 also requires that test
air temperature, as measured at the burner inlet, be within 5[emsp14][deg]F of the ambient temperature (which is measured
within 6 feet of the commercial packaged boiler at mid-height; see
section C3.7 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015).
DOE understands that ambient temperature and humidity, including
test air temperature, can have a measurable effect on the tested
efficiency of commercial packaged boilers, particularly condensing
commercial packaged boilers.\11\ High humidity or any increase in
humidity over a baseline would enable a commercial packaged boiler to
capture more latent heat from combustion gases, thereby resulting in a
higher measured efficiency. DOE recognizes that this effect would be
noticeable both in tests for combustion efficiency and thermal
efficiency. Therefore, DOE proposes to amend 10 CFR 431.86 so as to
minimize this effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Test air temperature is defined in ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015 as the temperature of the air being supplied to the burner from
the room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted previously, the existing DOE test procedure requires a
maximum of 80-percent ambient relative humidity in the test room or
chamber when testing a condensing commercial packaged boiler for
combustion efficiency only. DOE proposes to require that ambient
relative humidity at all times be 60 percent 5 percent
during thermal and combustion efficiency testing of commercial packaged
boilers.\12\ While DOE acknowledges that the effect of ambient humidity
on the efficiency of non-condensing commercial packaged boilers is less
than that for condensing commercial packaged boilers, DOE nevertheless
proposes the same ambient humidity requirements for all commercial
packaged boilers in order to maintain consistency and comparability
between ratings. Also, DOE proposes that the ambient relative humidity
be measured and recorded at each 30-second interval during the entire
test. DOE seeks comments, data, and information about room ambient
relative humidity, whether the proposed constraints are appropriate,
and if not, what are appropriate constraints on room ambient relative
humidity when testing commercial packaged boilers. This is identified
as Issue 22 in section V.E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Humidity is the amount of water vapor in the air. Absolute
humidity is the water content of air. Relative humidity, expressed
as a percent, measures the current absolute humidity relative to the
maximum for that temperature. Specific humidity is a ratio of the
water vapor content of the mixture to the total air content on a
mass basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to proposed limits to ambient relative humidity when
testing commercial packaged boilers, DOE proposes an ambient room
temperature of 75[emsp14][deg]F 5[emsp14][deg]F during
testing of commercial packaged boilers. The ambient temperature would
be measured and recorded at each 30-second interval during the entire
test. Additionally, DOE proposes that the ambient room temperature
cannot differ by more than 2[emsp14][deg]F from the
average ambient room temperature during the ``Test Period'' (as
described in section C4 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015;
proposed for incorporation by reference) at any reading.
DOE believes that limiting ambient room temperature and relative
humidity during testing will improve repeatability and provide for test
conditions that more closely reflect the ambient conditions that
commercial packaged boilers experience in normal operation. For non-
condensing hot water and steam commercial packaged boilers, DOE
anticipates negligible changes in the rated efficiency for a particular
commercial packaged boiler due to the proposed changes to room ambient
temperature and relative humidity requirements. Nevertheless, DOE
proposes limits to ambient conditions for non-condensing commercial
packaged boilers to prevent testing from occurring at extreme ambient
temperature or relative humidity, which would be outside the expected
range of conditions that commercial packaged boilers experience in
normal operation. In comparison, ambient room temperature and relative
humidity would have some effect on the test results for condensing
commercial packaged boilers. However, Because DOE expects that current
efficiency ratings generally have been determined at typical ambient
room temperatures and relative humidity levels, DOE also expects that
reported rating values will not change as a result of the proposed
limits on ambient room temperature and relative humidity, which fall
within the typical ambient room temperatures and relative humidity
levels.
DOE seeks comments, data, and information about the aforementioned
proposed room ambient temperatures, whether the proposed constraints
are appropriate, and if not, what are appropriate constraints on room
ambient temperature. This is identified as Issue 23 in section V.E.
F. Setup and Instrumentation
In DOE's review of the existing test procedure, DOE identified
several setup instructions and instrumentation requirements for which
clarifications are expected to improve the accuracy and repeatability
of test results. These include: (1) Additional specifications regarding
the steam riser/header geometry, (2) additional requirements regarding
the use of steam condensate return piping, and (3) additional
insulation requirements for the steam and water piping.
First, in section C2.3, ``Steam Piping,'' of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 (section 7.3 of BTS-2000), the description of the steam
riser/header geometry may lead to different interpretations which can
impact the amount of entrained water reaching the steam separator and
result in variability
[[Page 14655]]
in the measured thermal efficiency of commercial packaged boilers.
Specifically, variations in the nominal pipe diameter or size of the
pipe of the steam riser and the height of the steam riser above the
water line may impact the amount of entrained water in the steam and
may result in exceeding the DOE test procedure's 2 percent limit for
moisture content in the steam. In order to reduce the amount of
entrained water in the steam to satisfy this steam moisture
requirement, the water level within the commercial packaged boiler is
typically lowered during testing (within the allowable tolerance for
the water level pursuant to manufacturer literature or ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015 section C4.1.1.1.3, as applicable). However,
lowering the water level inside the heat exchanger decreases the
thermal efficiency of the commercial packaged boiler because as the
water level is lowered, less heat exchanger surface area is in contact
with water. Therefore, variations in the steam riser and header
geometry can affect the amount of moisture in the steam and require
changes in the water level to meet the 2 percent moisture content
requirement, which can then result in decreased thermal efficiency
measurements for the same commercial packaged boiler model.
To decrease the variability and increase the repeatability and
precision of the DOE test procedure, DOE therefore proposes to clarify
the description of the steam riser and header geometry in its test
procedure. Specifically, DOE proposes to adopt section C2.3 of ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015 with additional provisions regarding the
description of the steam riser and header geometries. The proposed
additional specifications and the reason for inclusion are as follows:
No reduction in diameter shall be made in any horizontal
header piping, as a reduction in pipe diameter in the horizontal header
prevents entrained water from draining properly and typically leads to
non-steady-state operation. In the case of commercial packaged boilers
with multiple steam risers, the cross-sectional area of the header must
be no less than 80 percent of the summed total cross-sectional area of
the risers, and the header pipe must be constant in diameter along its
entire length.
The diameter of the vertical portion of the steam
condensate return pipe that is above the manufacturer's recommended
water level may be reduced to no less than one half of the header pipe
diameter to ensure adequate operation of the return loop and draining
of entrained water back into the commercial packaged boiler.
DOE notes that section C2.3 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015
specifies that the steam riser shall be connected in accordance with
the manufacturer's instructions. However, in the event the
manufacturer's literature does not specify necessary height and
dimension characteristics for steam risers, headers, and return piping,
DOE proposes the following requirements to ensure consistent and
repeatable testing:
The header pipe diameter must be the same size as the
commercial packaged boiler's steam riser (steam take-off) pipe
diameter. In the case of commercial packaged boilers with multiple
steam risers, the cross-sectional area of the header must be no less
than 80 percent of the summed total cross-sectional area of the risers,
and the header pipe must be constant in diameter along its entire
length.
The height measured from the top of the header to the
manufacturer's recommended water level must be no less than the larger
of 24 inches or 6 times the header pipe diameter.
The distance between the vertical steam riser (steam take-
off) leading to the water separator and the elbow leading to the
condensate return loop must be a minimum of three (3) header pipe
diameters to prevent entrained water from entering the separator
piping.
If a water separator is used, piping must pitch downward
to the separator at a rate of at least \1/4\ inch per foot of pipe
length in order to assure proper collection of moisture content and
steady-state operation during testing.
A vented water seal is required in steam moisture
collection plumbing to prevent steam from escaping through the moisture
collection plumbing.
DOE notes that header diameters that are larger than the diameter
of the steam outlet can result in atypically low steam flow rate in the
header, affecting carryover of entrained water, while smaller diameter
headers may reduce the measured steam quality, possibly requiring tests
to be conducted at lower water levels, which may result in lower
efficiencies. Undersized headers with pipe diameters that are smaller
than the diameter of the steam outlet on the commercial packaged boiler
can also impede or prevent adequate draining of entrained water.
Second, Figure C5, ``Suggested Piping Arrangement for Steam
Boilers, Condensate Measurement,'' and Figure C7, ``Suggested Piping
Arrangement for Steam Boilers, Feedwater Measurement,'' in ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015 both allow a steam commercial packaged boiler to be
tested without a steam condensate return pipe. DOE proposes that all
steam commercial packaged boiler test setups be required to include a
steam condensate return pipe to minimize variation in tests. DOE also
proposes to prohibit use of the ``suggested'' piping arrangements in
Figures C5 and C7 for steam commercial packaged boiler testing setups.
DOE believes these changes would ensure that commercial packaged
boilers that typically require a steam condensate return pipe for
adequate operation have one installed during testing. DOE believes that
requiring a steam condensate return pipe, with the criteria specified
in this section, would ensure consistent and repeatable test results.
DOE further believes that such requirement would not have a significant
impact upon thermal efficiency or steam moisture content for a steam
commercial packaged boiler that may operate without a steam condensate
return pipe.
Third, Sections C2.3 and C2.4 in ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015
provide only minimal guidance about insulation requirements for steam
and water piping components that are used in the thermal efficiency
test. To provide for repeatability and minimize heat losses in the
piping, DOE proposes to adopt the minimum pipe insulation thickness and
conductivity requirements in ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013, Table
6.8.3-1. DOE also believes these requirements would be more
representative of insulation requirements for outlet piping used in
most commercial applications.
In view of all the above, DOE seeks comment about its proposed
changes to the steam riser, header, and return water loop testing
requirements. This is identified as Issue 24 in section V.E.
DOE recognizes that for oil-fired commercial packaged boilers,
burners are not always included when shipped from the manufacturer. In
such cases, DOE proposes that the unit be tested with the particular
make and model of burner certified by the manufacturer. Since each
basic model distributed in commerce must be certified, DOE expects that
using a manufacturer's certification will provide the most complete
list of all burners for use with a particular boiler. Furthermore, DOE
expects all burners specified in the installation and operation manual
would be certified to the Department as part of the commercial packaged
boiler basic model. If multiple burners are specified in the
installation and operation manualor in one or more certification
reports, then DOE proposes that any of the listed burners may be
[[Page 14656]]
used for testing and all must be certified to the Department. DOE
believes these provisions provide manufacturers with ample opportunity
to specify burners that should be used with their commercial packaged
boilers for testing, and will reduce ambiguity concerning what burner a
commercial packaged boiler can be tested with. DOE believes these
changes represent a clarification in how burners are specified and
therefore does not anticipate any changes in ratings for commercial
packaged boilers. DOE seeks comment regarding the specification of
burners for oil-fired commercial packaged boilers and this is
identified as Issue 25 in section V.E.
With respect to outdoor commercial packaged boilers, units with
multiple outdoor venting arrangements provided by the manufacturer are
required by ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 section C2.2.5 to be tested
using the arrangement having the least draft loss. However, draft loss
is not defined nor are provisions provided in ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015 for determining which arrangement has the least draft loss. DOE
proposes language in its test procedure to clarify how this is
determined, specifically by adding the straight lengths of venting for
each arrangement supplied with the equipment and using the one with the
shortest total length. DOE believes this is a clarification only and
does not believe ratings for commercial packaged boilers would be
affected by this clarification.
In addition to these proposed clarifications regarding the setup
and configuration of commercial packaged boilers for testing, DOE
proposes clarifications and provisions regarding the test
instrumentation and calibration. Specifically, regarding section 7.6,
``Application of Additional Instruments (Steam),'' of BTS-2000 (now
section C2.6 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015), ABMA commented that
references to mercury and use of a mercury manometer should be removed,
suggesting that mercury is no longer an industry-acceptable pressure
measuring fluid for testing steam boilers.\13\ (Docket EERE-2013-BT-
STD-0030, ABMA, No. 14 at p. 3-4) DOE has concluded that the mercury-
based instrumentation is outdated and recognizes that the ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015 does not require or reference the use of mercury
manometers. As such, DOE notes that by incorporating by reference ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015 as proposed in this NOPR, the DOE test
procedure would no longer specify or reference use of mercury
manometers (or other mercury-based instrumentation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ A ``manometer'' is an instrument that uses a column of
liquid, such as mercury or water, contained in a glass or plastic
tube and is used to measure the pressure of gases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, ABMA suggested that some other required
instrumentation prescribed in BTS-2000 is outdated and that some
calculation methods contained therein are laborious. In particular,
ABMA inquired whether an oxygen (O2) combustion analyzer may
be used to determine combustion efficiency rather than the existing
calculation procedures if it can be shown that its results are
equivalent. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, ABMA, No. 14 at pp. 3-4)
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 includes a methodology for using an
O2 combustion analyzer for measurements of combustion
efficiency, and DOE's proposal to incorporate by reference this
industry standard would adopt this methodology. DOE recognizes ABMA's
concern on this topic and seeks additional comments, and particularly
data, about whether the oxygen combustion analyzer produces equivalent
combustion efficiencies to the carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide
(CO2) calculations provided by ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015
and BTS-2000. This is identified as Issue 26 in section V.E.
DOE acknowledges that section C.1.1, ``Calibration,'' of ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015 requires instruments to be calibrated to a
recognized standard at regular intervals. DOE believes that such a
requirement is sufficient for ensuring appropriate calibration
procedures for applicable test equipment. However, in order to ensure
accurate and repeatable test measurements, DOE is proposing a provision
that would require all instrumentation to be calibrated at least once
per year. For combustion measurement equipment (instruments listed in
the ``Gas Chemistry'' row of Table C1 in ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015),
DOE proposes to require calibration using standard gases with purities
of greater than 99.9995 percent for all constituents analyzed. DOE
acknowledges that manufacturers and laboratories may have existing
calibration and documentation protocols in place that already meet
these requirements.
Finally, DOE proposes to require that data obtained digitally be
sampled and recorded at 30-second intervals or less, and data related
to rates, flows, or flux be integrated over the 15-minute intervals
required throughout ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. Data not related to
rates, flows, or fluxes shall be averaged over the 15-minute interval.
DOE proposes this requirement as a means of confirming that ambient
condition requirements and water temperatures are maintained for the
duration of the test. This requirement would apply to digital flow
meters for measuring water flow. However, DOE proposes that this
requirement would not apply to the use of a scale for measuring the
weight of feedwater collected, which would continue to be recorded in
15-minute intervals as provided in ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. DOE
seeks comment on its proposal to require digital data acquisition, and
this is identified as Issue 27 in section V.E.
DOE seeks general comment as to the proposed clarifications to test
procedure setup and instrumentation. This is identified as Issue 28 in
section V.E.
G. Fuel Input Rate
In DOE's existing regulations, equipment classes and the standards
that apply to them are determined partly on the basis of the size of
the commercial packaged boiler. However, several terms are used
interchangeably in BTS 2000, ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, and in the
existing DOE test procedure and energy conservation standards to
describe the size of the commercial packaged boiler, each of which is
derived from the maximum rated fuel input rate to the commercial
packaged boiler. For example, the existing DOE test procedure for
commercial packaged boilers at 10 CFR 431.86 uses the term ``rated
input capacity'' and ``fuel input'' while the energy conservation
standards for commercial packaged boilers at 10 CFR 431.87 use
``capacity,'' ``rated maximum input,'' ``maximum rated capacity,'' and
``size category (input),'' all of which are intended to mean the same
thing. BTS-2000, which is incorporated by reference in the existing DOE
test procedure for commercial packaged boiler, uses the terms
``input,'' ``input rating,'' and ``manufacturer's nameplate input.''
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 defines ``input rating'' as the maximum
Btu/h or gph [gallons per hour] input located on the Boiler rating
plate. Furthermore, neither the existing DOE regulatory text nor BTS-
2000 specify how to determine this ``rated'' or ``nameplate'' maximum
fuel input rate for a commercial packaged boiler. However, BTS-2000 and
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 require that the input be within 2 percent of the ``manufacturer's nameplate input'' (BTS-2000) or
``Input Rating'' (ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015).
To clarify how to determine the appropriate equipment class for
[[Page 14657]]
commercial packaged boilers, DOE proposes to adopt a definition for the
term ``fuel input rate.'' DOE believes this is necessary to reduce
ambiguity and standardize terminology throughout its commercial
packaged boiler regulations. The proposed definition for ``fuel input
rate'' states that it is determined using test procedures prescribed
under 10 CFR 431.86 and represents the maximum rate, or ``high fire
rate,'' at which the commercial packaged boiler uses energy. DOE
proposes to use this term in the division of equipment classes and
applicable testing provisions to determine the fuel input rate.
Manufacturers would be required to measure the fuel input rate during
certification testing and use the mean of the measured values, after
applying the applicable rounding provisions,\14\ in certification
reports pursuant to 10 CFR 429.60(b)(2). DOE also notes that, for
commercial packaged boilers certified using an AEDM, that AEDM would be
used to determine the fuel input rate and the same rounding provisions
would apply. DOE believes it is critical to clarify how the fuel input
rate is to be determined because the applicable standards for a
commercial packaged boiler are based in part on the fuel input rate of
the commercial packaged boiler. These proposed additions would clarify
for manufacturers what energy conservation standard applies to a given
basic model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The proposed calculations for the fuel input rate include a
rounding requirement to the nearest 1,000 Btu/h; this is discussed
in this section III.G.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE also proposes clarifications in its regulatory text that
specify precisely how the fuel input rate is to be determined when
using the DOE test procedure. DOE notes sections C4.1.1.2.3 and
C4.1.2.2.3 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 require the total measured
fuel input during the test to be within 2 percent of the ``boiler Input
Rating'' and sections C4.1.1.1.4 and C4.1.2.1.5 require the measured
fuel input rate, measured at 15-minute intervals to confirm steady-
state, to be within 2 percent of the fuel input rate listed on the
commercial packaged boiler nameplate. However, ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015 does not specify the quantities and calculation procedure to be
used in determining this value. DOE's clarifications specify the amount
of oil or gas, as applicable, needed to ensure the fuel input rate is
at steady-state (which is evaluated at 15-minute intervals). Moreover,
DOE also proposes that steady-state is confirmed when the measured fuel
input rate does not vary by more than 2 percent between 15
minute interval readings rather than in comparison to the commercial
packaged boiler nameplate.
Section 5.2.2 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 specifies rounding
gross output (as defined in section 3.20 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015) to the nearest 1,000 Btu/h. DOE does not propose to adopt this
section of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 because DOE regulations are not
based on gross output. Instead, DOE proposes adding a requirement to
the DOE test procedure that values of fuel input rate for each unit
tested be rounded to the nearest 1,000 Btu/h. Also, the representative
value of fuel input rate for a model would be rounded to the nearest
1,000 Btu/h for representation purposes (including certification).
Additionally, DOE proposes that, for its enforcement testing, this
rate would be measured pursuant to 10 CFR 431.86 and compared against
the fuel input rate certified by the manufacturer. If the measured fuel
input rate is within 2 percent of the certified value, then DOE will
use the certified value when determining equipment class and
calculating combustion and/or thermal efficiency for the model. If the
measured fuel input rate is not within 2 percent of the
certified value, then DOE will follow these steps to bring the fuel
input rate to within 2 percent of the certified value.
First, DOE will attempt to adjust the gas pressure in order to increase
or decrease the fuel input rate as necessary. If the fuel input rate is
still not within 2 percent of the certified value, DOE will
then attempt to modify the gas inlet orifice (e.g., drill) accordingly.
Finally, if these measures do not bring the fuel input rate to within
2 percent of the certified value, DOE will use the measured
fuel input rate when determining equipment class and the associated
combustion and/or thermal efficiency standard level for the basic
model. DOE proposes a fuel input rate tolerance of 2
percent based on the steady-state criteria already present in ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015 sections C4.1.1.1.4 and C4.1.2.1.5, and believes
that such a requirement would not impose additional testing burden or
affect ratings. DOE proposes this verification process to provide
manufacturers with additional information about how DOE will evaluate
compliance. DOE also notes that modification of the orifice to meet
these conditions would not be considered a field constructed
modification.
DOE considers these provisions to be clarifications to its test
procedure, and this is supported by the existing requirement in BTS-
2000 that the measured fuel input rate during testing must be within
2 percent of the fuel input rate listed on commercial
packaged boiler nameplates. DOE seeks comment regarding its proposed
definition and methodology for measuring and verifying fuel input rate
and steady-state, identified as Issue 29 in section V.E.
H. Clerical Issues
DOE proposes an amendment to the regulatory text to clarify those
places in AHRI/ANSI Standard 1500-2015 that refer to manufacturer's
``specifications or recommendations,'' to mean as specified or
recommended in the installation and operation manual shipped with the
commercial packaged boiler or in supplemental instructions provided by
the manufacturer pursuant to 10 CFR 429.60(b)(4). Furthermore, DOE
proposes amendments to the regulatory text that clarify the order in
which these manufacturer instructions must be used should a conflict
arise between them. For parameters or considerations not specified by
the DOE test procedure, the manual shipped with the commercial packaged
boiler must first be consulted and used. Should the manual shipped with
the commercial packaged boiler not provide the necessary information,
the supplemental instructions must be consulted and used. The
supplemental instructions provided pursuant to 10 CFR 429.60(b)(4) do
not replace or alter any requirements in the DOE test procedure and are
not meant to override the manual shipped with the commercial packaged
boiler. In cases where these supplemental instructions conflict with
any instructions or provisions provided in the manual shipped with the
commercial packaged boiler, the manual shipped with the commercial
packaged boiler must be used. DOE also proposes to clarify that unless
otherwise noted, in all incorporated sections of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 the term ``boiler'' means ``commercial packaged boiler'' as
defined in 10 CFR 431.82.
DOE found two clerical issues in its review of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015. First, DOE notes that while section C2.3 of ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015 anticipates that steam could be superheated and
therefore temperature measurement of the steam would be required, it
does not provide sufficient steam property tables or provisions for
using the superheated steam temperature for calculating the thermal
efficiency. DOE therefore proposes provisions for using this
temperature and includes expanded steam property tables. Second, DOE
notes that section C4.1.1.1.2 of ANSI/
[[Page 14658]]
AHRI Standard 1500-2015 states that tests shall be conducted at
atmospheric pressure or at the minimum steam pressure required to
comply with Section 5.3.5. However, Section 5.3.5 describes the hot
water rating conditions for ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. DOE believes
that this was intended to refer instead to Section 5.3.6, and therefore
proposes language in order to correct this.
Upon review of its definitions at 10 CFR 431.82 concerning
commercial packaged boilers, DOE determined that additional description
of the term ``combustion efficiency'' was warranted and is therefore
proposing to modify that definition. Specifically, the existing
definition for ``combustion efficiency'' does not describe what the
metric represents and so DOE is proposing additional language to
indicate that the combustion efficiency measures how much of the fuel
input energy is converted to useful heat in combustion.
DOE proposes rounding requirements for thermal efficiency and
combustion efficiency values. DOE notes that while section 5.2.1 of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 includes rounding requirements to the
nearest tenth of a percent for thermal and combustion efficiency, DOE
proposes to clarify in its regulations that values used for purposes of
DOE compliance certification (representative values) must be values
rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
With respect to the requirements for testing and certifying
commercial packaged boiler models capable of supplying either steam or
hot water, DOE notes that commercial packaged boilers that are capable
of producing steam and commercial packaged boilers that are capable of
producing hot water are subject to different energy conservation
standards. However, DOE is also aware that some commercial packaged
boiler models are capable of supplying both steam and hot water. DOE
notes that such commercial packaged boiler models span two equipment
classes (both the steam and hot water variations of the applicable fuel
type and fuel input rate category combination) and therefore are
subject to the energy conservation standards and testing requirements
for both equipment classes. Models capable of producing both steam and
hot water must be certified as two basic models.
DOE also proposes to move the requirements related to
representative values of efficiency for such commercial packaged
boilers. For commercial packaged boiler models capable of supplying
either steam or hot water and with fuel input rate less than or equal
to 2,500,000 Btu/h, under the existing test procedure (10 CFR
431.86(c)(2)(iii)) manufacturers must:
Determine the representative value of the thermal
efficiency in steam mode based on thermal efficiency in steam mode
determined in accordance with the test procedure in Sec. 431.86 or
determined with an AEDM; and
Determine the representative value of the thermal
efficiency in hot water mode based on either:
[cir] The thermal efficiency in hot water mode determined in
accordance with the test procedure in Sec. 431.86 or determined with
an AEDM; or
[cir] The thermal efficiency in steam mode determined in accordance
with the test procedure in Sec. 431.86 or determined with an AEDM.
For commercial packaged boiler models capable of supplying either
steam or hot water and with fuel input rate greater than 2,500,000 Btu/
h, under the existing test procedure (10 CFR 431.86(c)(2)(iii))
manufacturers must:
Determine the representative value of the thermal
efficiency in steam mode based on thermal efficiency in steam mode
determined in accordance with the test procedure in Sec. 431.86 or
determined with an AEDM; and
Determine the representative value of the combustion
efficiency in hot water mode based on either:
[cir] The combustion efficiency in hot water mode determined in
accordance with the test procedure in Sec. 431.86 or determined with
an AEDM; or
[cir] The combustion efficiency in steam mode determined in
accordance with the test procedure in Sec. 431.86 or determined with
an AEDM.
DOE notes that these are existing provisions for such boilers at 10
CFR 431.86(c)(2)(iii) that establish the testing and rating
requirements for commercial packaged boiler models capable of supplying
either steam or hot water. Because provisions related to
representations are typically in 10 CFR part 429, DOE is moving and
rephrasing these requirements. Therefore, DOE notes that these
regulations do not alter testing or rating options compared to the
existing test procedure.
DOE seeks comment on its proposed clerical corrections and
clarifications, identified as Issue 30 in section V.E.
I. Other Issues
In response to the September 2013 Framework document and February
2014 RFI, DOE received several comments about other issues, not
discussed previously in this notice, concerning the test procedure for
determining the energy efficiency of a commercial packaged boiler.
These issues and comments are addressed in the following subsections.
1. Stack Temperature Adjustment for Using Combustion Efficiency in
Steam Mode To Represent Hot Water Mode
DOE's existing test procedure allows commercial packaged boilers
with fuel input rate greater than 2,500,000 Btu/h capable of producing
steam and hot water to use the combustion efficiency as measured in
steam mode to represent the combustion efficiency in hot water mode. 10
CFR 431.86(c)(2)(iii)(B). DOE has received multiple waiver requests
that asked to use an adjustment to the stack temperature for using this
rating method in order to more accurately reflect the combustion
efficiency of a commercial packaged boiler operating in hot water mode.
The adjustment is given by Equation 2:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17MR16.003
where TF,SS,adjusted is the adjusted steady-state flue
temperature used for subsequent calculations of combustion efficiency,
TF,SS is the measured steady-state flue temperature during
combustion efficiency testing in steam mode, Tsat is the
saturated steam temperature that corresponds to the measured steam
pressure, and 180 is the hot water outlet temperature.
The proposed adjustment equation is derived by assuming that the
heat transfer properties of the heat exchanger operating in hot water
mode are roughly the same as the heat transfer properties of the heat
exchanger operating in steam mode. This assumption is already implicit
in the DOE allowance for using combustion efficiency ratings in steam
mode to represent those in hot water mode, and, thus, this methodology
is consistent with the intent of DOE's existing regulations. DOE
believes that the methodology is technically sound and may result in
more accurate representations of the performance of
[[Page 14659]]
these commercial packaged boilers operating in hot water mode.
However, to further validate the proposed procedure, DOE seeks
comments, as well as sample stack temperature data, sample calculations
and estimates of the impact of this methodology. This is identified as
Issue 31 in section V.E.
Relatedly, DOE proposes additional provisions for enforcement
testing of commercial packaged boilers that are capable of producing
both steam and hot water. Specifically, DOE is proposing that DOE could
choose to test a given model that is capable of producing both steam
and hot water in either mode for the purposes of assessing compliance
with the applicable standard. DOE seeks comment regarding this proposed
provision, and this is identified as Issue 32 in section V.E.
2. Testing at Part Load
In response to the September 2013 Framework document, ACEEE, ASAP,
and NRDC asserted that the existing DOE test procedure for commercial
packaged boilers, which is based on BTS-2000 and measures efficiency at
peak load, is obsolete and that the rating method for boilers with
modulating burners (including high/low fire) must incorporate some
part-load efficiency measure. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, Joint
Advocates, No. 16 at p. 2)
In the February 2014 RFI, DOE requested additional public comment,
data, and information about adopting methodologies and measurements to
determine part-load efficiency of commercial packaged boilers,
including appropriate inlet and outlet water temperatures under part-
load testing conditions, number of hours a modulating burner would
operate under part-load and full-load conditions over the course of a
year, and any added test burden to account for part-load operation
(e.g., measurement of jacket, sensible, and infiltration losses). 79 FR
9643, 9644.
ACEEE stated that whether for a fixed capacity or modulating
boiler, the lower the inlet water temperature the higher the
efficiency, and suggested that a boiler be rated at the lowest inlet
water temperature permissible under a manufacturer's warranty. Also, in
response to expected hours that modulating burners would operate under
part-load and full-load conditions, ACEEE advocated for a review of
industry designs, operational data, and simulations for boiler
operation over the course of a year. (Docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006,
ACEEE, No. 2 at pp. 2 and 3)
Burnham suggested using the same inlet/outlet water temperatures
for part-load testing as for full [load] input testing because the
design of modulating burners is indifferent to operating at full load
or part load, and actual operation would vary according to the
application. As for added test burden associated with part-load
operation, Burnham asserted that test costs would double and that
additional testing equipment would be needed to accommodate more
precise control of lower flows and measurement. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-
STD-0030, Burnham, No. 4 at pp. 1 and 2)
HTP stated that part-load testing would burden manufacturers when
multiple operating conditions are required and, given possible
misunderstanding of the systems-level aspects of efficiency, there may
be market confusion over multiple efficiency ratings. HTP posited that
DOE should only regulate single-point minimum efficiencies for
commercial packaged boilers to maintain consistency with historical use
of ``high fire rate.'' (Docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006, HTP, No. 5 at p.
2)
Although ACEEE suggested that DOE require enough testing to
describe the entire performance map of the boiler (Docket EERE-2014-BT-
TP-0006, ACEEE, No. 2 at p. 1), several parties expressed the concern
that additional test points would greatly increase the testing burden
for minimal added benefit. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, ABMA, No. 39
at p. 68; Docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006, Burnham, No. 4 at p. 1; Docket
EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006, HTP, No. 5 at p. 2)
DOE understands that while a modulating burner can greatly reduce
the annual energy consumption of a condensing commercial packaged
boiler, the effect of a modulating burner on the measured steady-state
efficiency of a non-condensing commercial packaged boiler is small.\15\
Thus, DOE has tentatively determined that small increases in steady-
state efficiency of non-condensing commercial packaged boilers at
reduced firing rates do not warrant additional test procedures or
efficiency metrics for non-condensing commercial packaged boilers
operating at reduced firing rates. DOE also acknowledges the concerns
from manufacturers (testing at different input ratings would require
tests to be repeated, at least in part, multiple times). Therefore, DOE
tentatively concludes that additional part-load testing for any
commercial packaged boiler is not warranted at this time, but seeks
further comment about part-load testing. This is identified as Issue 33
in section V.E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Lochinvar Web site for example efficiency curves at
various firing rates: http://www.lochinvar.com/products/documentation.aspx?mode=filetype&filetypeid=25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Other Industry Test Procedures
Instead of using BTS-2000 to measure commercial packaged boiler
efficiencies, Cleaver-Brooks suggested using the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME) PTC 4.1-1964 (Reaffirmed 1991), ``Power
Test Codes: Test Code for Steam Generating Units'' (with 1968 and 1969
Addenda) (ASME PTC 4.1), particularly the abbreviated test form and the
heat loss method incorporated therein. Cleaver-Brooks added that ASME
PTC 4.1 is the most common standard used by manufacturers of larger
commercial packaged boilers (i.e., boilers greater than 2,500,000 Btu/h
rated input), and that the heat loss method in that standard
essentially provides the same efficiency values as BTS-2000 combustion
efficiency if radiation losses are included. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-
0030, Cleaver-Brooks, No. 12 at p. 2) ABMA agreed that ASME PTC-4.1 is
the more appropriate testing standard for larger boilers. ABMA cited
general concerns about BTS-2000 from its member manufacturers,
including (1) the high cost of testing larger boilers; (2) the 0-2 psig
test pressure requirement that causes high steam velocity and poor
steam quality; (3) large temperature rises causing high strain and
fatigue in larger boilers; (4) the custom-built nature of larger
combustion equipment; and (5) safety compliance requirements of other
entities such as the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel
Inspectors. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, ABMA, No. 14 at pp. 2, 3)
ABMA suggested in its comments responding to the November 2014
Preliminary Analysis that ASME PTC 4 (note: not PTC-4.1) should be used
for testing. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, ABMA No. 33 at p. 2)
As part of the energy conservation standards and test procedure
rulemaking for commercial packaged boilers that concluded with the
final rule published in the Federal Register on October 21, 2004 (69 FR
61949), DOE evaluated five other industry test procedures for potential
incorporation by reference under 10 CFR 431.85.\16\ At
[[Page 14660]]
that time, DOE considered both ASME PTC 4-1998, ``Fired Steam
Generators Test Codes,'' and ASME PTC 4.1-1964, ``Steam Generating
Units Power Test Codes,'' as potential alternatives to BTS-2000.
However, DOE adopted-BTS-2000 for testing all covered commercial
packaged boilers manufactured after October 21, 2006. Prior to that
date, a manufacturer could use either BTS-2000 or the alternative test
method ASME PTC 4.1-1964 for steel commercial packaged boilers. 69 FR
61949, 61961.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The version of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 in effect on June 30,
1992, referenced five industry test standards that apply to gas-
fired boilers or oil-fired boilers or both. These are the ANSI
Standard Z21.13-1987 for gas-fired boilers (revised as ANSI Z21.13-
1991 with Addendum ANSI Z21.13-1993a); the HI Testing and Rating
Standard for Heating Boilers, sixth edition, 1989, for gas and oil-
fired boilers (HI 1989); ASME Power Test Codes (PTC) 4.1-1964
(reaffirmed R1991) for Steam Generating Units for fossil fuel
boilers (revised in 1998 as ASME PTC 4-1998, Fired Steam Generators,
issued on December 31, 1999); the Underwriters Laboratory Standard
795-1973 for gas heating equipment (UL 795, revised in 1994 as UL
795-94); and the Underwriters Laboratory Standard UL Standard 726-
1990 for oil-fired boilers (UL 726). See 69 FR 61955 (October 21,
2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For this NOPR, DOE re-examined the test procedures and public
comments addressed in the October 21, 2004 final rule and the rationale
behind each. For example, public comments from GAMA about ASME PTC 4.1
included the following observations and critiques: (1) It lacks
``tolerances for input, pressure, number of tests required, and when
the boiler has achieved steady-state conditions;'' (2) test duration of
4 hours is too long for a combustion test, and the locations ``of
temperature, pressure, flue sampling, and stack configuration are not
specified;'' (3) it is a test standard for the acceptance test of a
boiler after it is installed where the test conditions are less
controllable than a laboratory test; and (4) it has been replaced by
the standard ASME PTC 4-1998 which is vastly different from the
original ASME PTC 4.1. As such, DOE believed then and continues to
believe that ASME PTC 4.1 would be too burdensome, that hours of
testing are longer than needed, and that there are differences in
results between PTC 4.1 and BTS-2000. In the October 2004 final rule,
DOE found that ASME PTC 4.1-1964 (PTC 4.1) and its successor ASME PTC
4-1998 (PTC 4) were not fit for adoption as the required test procedure
for the following reasons:
The abbreviated test form of PTC 4.1, while a sound test,
was removed in the PTC 4 version and its use was discouraged by the PTC
4 standard.
Since the abbreviated test form of PTC 4.1 was not part of
PTC 4, the test burden of the new standard was excessive for the
purposes of rating smaller commercial packaged boilers.
DOE believed there may be some differences in efficiency
ratings between the PTC 4.1 and BTS-2000 tests, and, therefore, only
one test method would be adopted.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The analysis conducted at the time of the NOPR used the
document's previous version, HI-1989. 65 FR 48838 (August 9, 2000).
At the time of final rule, DOE was provided with the updated BTS-
2000 and found sufficient similarity such that BTS-2000 could be
adopted as the test procedure without further analysis. 69 FR 61949,
61955-56 (October 21, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BTS-2000 was simple to conduct, and converting from the
abbreviated test form of PTC 4.1 to BTS-2000 would not be overly
burdensome.
69 FR 61949, 61954-57.
DOE notes that these findings from the October 2004 final rule
concerning BTS-2000 continue to apply to ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015
because ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 is an updated version of BTS-2000.
On July 22, 2009, DOE published a final rule adopting the thermal
efficiency metric as the energy efficiency descriptor for eight of ten
equipment classes of commercial packaged boilers in order to conform to
ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007. 74 FR 36314. The thermal efficiency metric
was required for purposes of compliance starting March 2, 2012. DOE
notes that BTS-2000 was incorporated by reference as the foundation of
the DOE test procedure on October 21, 2004. 69 FR 61949. Manufacturers
have been required to use BTS-2000 for purposes of compliance since
October 24, 2006. 69 FR 61961. DOE has not been provided with new data
that substantiate claims from ABMA or manufacturers regarding possible
test complications or burden since these previous rulemakings were
undertaken.
With regard to ABMA's specific claims concerning the BTS-2000
methodology (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, ABMA, No. 14 at p. 2, 3),
DOE proposes modified inlet and outlet water temperatures for hot water
commercial packaged boiler tests (section III.D) and a wider allowable
range of steam operating pressures for steam commercial packaged boiler
tests (see section III.C.4), as provided in ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015. DOE believes these proposals would alleviate ABMA's concerns
regarding excessive commercial packaged boiler stresses and steam
quality and are consistent with ABMA's suggestions. (Docket EERE-2013-
BT-STD-0030, ABMA, No. 14 at p. 4)
AHRI commented that ASHRAE Standard 155, ``Method of Testing for
Rating Commercial Space Heating Boiler Systems,'' is being developed as
a replacement for BTS-2000 (and ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015) and that
DOE could adopt this new standard as a new reference for the commercial
packaged boiler test procedure. (Docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0006, AHRI, No.
6 at pp. 2-3) AHRI suggested that DOE should defer considering
alterations to its test procedure until ASHRAE Standard 155 is
published. PGE and SCE also urged DOE to consider using the ASHRAE
Standard 155, which is currently under development, as the basis for
the Federal test procedure. (Docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030, Joint
Utilities, No. 38 at p. 3) DOE understands that the development of
ASHRAE Standard 155 is currently a proposed standards project.\18\ DOE
is not aware of any scheduled publication date, and is now subject to a
statutory requirement to review the test procedure. As stated
previously, DOE last reviewed the test procedures for commercial
packaged boilers in a final rule published in the Federal Register on
July 22, 2009 (74 FR 36312), and thus is required to re-evaluate the
test procedures no later than July 22, 2016. Consequently, DOE plans to
move forward with this test procedure rulemaking for commercial
packaged boilers. However, DOE will monitor developments related to
ASHRAE Standard 155 and may consider incorporation of that standard in
a future test procedure rulemaking. As noted previously, in this NOPR,
DOE proposes to incorporate by reference the recently published ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015 that supersedes the BTS-2000 standard and
corrects some minor issues therein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ ASHRAE Standard 155 (currently identified as SPC 155P) is a
proposed standards project, the purpose of which is to develop
procedures for determining the steady-state thermal efficiency,
part-load efficiency, and idling energy input rate of space heating
boilers. See https://www.ashrae.org/standards-research--technology/
standards--guidelines/titles-purposes-and-scopes#SPC155P.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that test
procedure rulemakings do not constitute ``significant regulatory
actions'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory
Planning and Review,'' 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993). Accordingly, this
regulatory action was not subject to review under the Executive Order
by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in OMB.
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation
[[Page 14661]]
of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IFRA) for any rule that
by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency certifies
that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required by
Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking,'' 67 FR 53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that the
potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the DOE rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made
its procedures and policies available on the Office of the General
Counsel's Web site: http://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel.
This proposed rule prescribes test procedure amendments that would
be used to determine compliance with energy conservation standards for
commercial packaged boilers. The proposed amendments modify the inlet
and outlet water temperatures for hot water tests, increase the
allowable steam pressure for steam tests, implement more specific
criteria for determining when steady-state has been reached during
testing, and establish room temperature and relative humidity limits.
DOE reviewed this proposed rule under the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and DOE's own procedures and policies
published on February 19, 2003. DOE has concluded that the proposed
rule would not have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The factual basis for this certification is as follows.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) considers a business entity
to be a small business, if, together with its affiliates, it employs
less than a threshold number of workers specified in 13 CFR part 121.
These size standards and codes are established by the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS). The threshold number for NAICS
classification code 333414, which applies to ``heating equipment
(except warm air furnaces) manufacturing' and includes commercial
packaged boilers, is 500 employees.
To estimate the number of companies that could be small business
manufacturers of the equipment affected by this rulemaking, DOE
conducted a market survey using available public information to
identify potential small manufacturers. DOE's research involved
reviewing the AHRI directory (a product database), individual company
Web sites, and marketing research tools (e.g., Hoover's reports) to
create a list of all domestic small business manufacturers of equipment
affected by this rulemaking. DOE identified 23 manufacturers of
commercial packaged boilers as domestic small business manufacturers.
DOE was able to discuss the DOE test procedures with 5 of these small
businesses. DOE also obtained information about small businesses and
potential impacts on small businesses while interviewing manufacturers
in the context of the standards rulemaking. However, DOE did not
receive any detailed quantifications about the incremental burden small
businesses would face as compared to larger businesses in light of the
proposed methods.
The proposed amendments would alter water temperatures for hot
water commercial packaged boilers tests, increase the allowable steam
pressure for steam tests, add specific criteria for establishing
steady-state, and place limits on the ambient temperature and relative
humidity during testing. DOE recognizes that by reducing the
temperature rise across the commercial packaged boiler, the water flow
rate will necessarily increase proportionally. The required flow rate
for a 10 million Btu/h fuel input rate commercial packaged boiler with
a 100[emsp14][deg]F minimum temperature rise (as is the case currently
for non-condensing commercial packaged boilers) would be approximately
200 gallons per minute (gpm). Reducing the temperature rise across the
commercial packaged boiler to 40[emsp14][deg]F would increase the water
flow rate requirement to approximately 500 gpm for a 10 million Btu/h
fuel input rate commercial packaged boiler. If a laboratory or
manufacturer does not currently have a pump capable of handling the
flow rates of the commercial packaged boilers they are testing, they
may need to purchase a pump rated for a higher flow rate. Based on
internet research of several HVAC equipment vendors, DOE estimates that
the cost of a pump capable of 500 gpm is $3,000. The number of models
for which this investment would be required would vary by manufacturer
and laboratory; however, DOE estimates the average to be 15 models.\19\
Therefore, DOE estimates the cost per model of this investment to be
approximately $200, which DOE believes to be a modest amount compared
to the total product development and certification costs of a model,
which can be in the tens of thousands of dollars.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Based on product model listing compiled for commercial
packaged boilers standards rulemaking using the AHRI directory,
docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030.
\20\ Based on information obtained during confidential
manufacturer interviews as part of the commercial packaged boilers
standards rulemaking, docket EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding the increase in allowable steam pressure for steam
commercial packaged boiler tests, manufacturers will likely initiate a
test at low pressure (much less than 15 psi) and increase as necessary
(up to 15 psi) to achieve the necessary steam quality. While the setup
and operation of the test is unchanged, this process may increase the
amount of time necessary to perform the test. DOE estimates that this
would increase test time by, at most, 2 hours. For a 10 million Btu/h
fuel input rate commercial packaged boiler, and assuming a rate of $40
per hour for a laboratory technician, $8.89 per thousand cubic feet of
natural gas, and 1,025 Btu per cubic foot high heating value (HHV), DOE
estimates the additional testing cost to be $253.46.\21\ DOE believes
this amount is modest in comparison to the overall cost of product
development and certification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ The laboratory technician hourly wage is based on mean
hourly wage of $26.67 from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for a
Mechanical Engineering Technician, occupational code 17-3027: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes173027.htm. (Last accessed January 21,
2016.) Mean hourly wage is multiplied by 1.5 to estimate associated
benefits and overhead. The price of natural gas is the 5-year
average (May 2009 to May 2014) obtained from the ``U.S. Price of
Natural Gas Sold to Commercial Consumers'' from U.S. Energy
Information Administration (EIA) (Available at: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n3020us3m.htm).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case of the criteria for establishing steady-state, DOE
believes that the requirements do not add to the time or cost necessary
to conduct the test. The test procedure already requires a period of 30
minutes prior to starting the test, during which steady-state is
established. DOE is clarifying the conditions that must be satisfied to
meet steady-state, and does not believe any additional time is required
to meet such conditions.
With regard to the test room ambient temperature and relative
humidity limits, DOE notes that the limits are intended to prevent the
test from being conducted in extreme ambient conditions, and that the
allowable temperature and relative humidity ranges are typical for
building heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning systems in normal
operating conditions. DOE is aware that the proposed constraints may in
some cases require laboratories to move testing from an uncontrolled
environment (i.e., outdoors or facilities open to the outdoors) to a
controlled environment. However, DOE believes this to be a
[[Page 14662]]
small number of cases, and that typically testing is performed in a
laboratory setting with typical heating, ventilating, and air-
conditioning systems and controls. DOE notes that the limits are
intended to prevent the test from being conducted in extreme ambient
conditions, and that the ambient temperature requirements are typical
for building heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning systems in
normal operating condition. However, if the ambient temperature or
relative humidity in the testing area do not already meet these
tolerances, the manufacturer may need to improve climate regulation of
the test environment, possibly by improving the controls of their
thermostats, or preventing hot or cold drafts from entering the testing
environment. DOE estimates that improving the controls of the
thermostat and preventing hot or cold drafts from entering the testing
environment could involve four to eight hours of labor by a general
technician. At a rate of $40 per hour for a laboratory technician, DOE
estimates the cost for this amount of labor to be between $160 and
$320, which DOE believes is modest in comparison to the overall cost of
product development and certification.
Finally, DOE acknowledges that the proposal to require digital data
acquisition may add additional test burden. DOE has estimated the
following costs associated with digital data acquisition:
Table IV.1--Estimated One-Time Costs Associated With Digital Data
Acquisition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laptop.................................................. $1,500
Data Acquisition Module................................. 2,000
Data Acquisition Software............................... 3,000
Installation and Setup (16 hours laboratory technician 640
time x $40/hour).......................................
---------------
Total............................................... 7,140
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The data acquisition system could be used by the manufacturer or
laboratory to test all commercial packaged boiler models. Again, DOE
believes these costs are modest in comparison to the overall cost of
product development and certification.
For the reasons stated previously, DOE concludes that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, so DOE has not prepared a regulatory
flexibility analysis for this rulemaking. DOE will provide its
certification and supporting statement of factual basis to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA for review under 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
DOE seeks comment on whether the proposed test procedure changes
will have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This is identified as Issue 34 in section V.E.
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Manufacturers of commercial packaged boilers must certify to DOE
that their equipment complies with all applicable energy conservation
standards. In certifying compliance, manufacturers must test their
equipment according to the DOE test procedure for commercial packaged
boilers under 10 CFR 431.86, including any amendments adopted for those
test procedures, on the date that compliance is required. DOE has
established regulations for the certification and recordkeeping
requirements for all covered consumer products and commercial
equipment, including commercial packaged boilers. See 10 CFR part 429,
subpart B. The collection-of-information requirement for certification
and recordkeeping is subject to review and approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has been approved by
OMB under OMB Control Number 1910-1400. Public reporting burden for the
certification is estimated to average 30 hours per response, including
the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this proposed rule, DOE proposes test procedure amendments that
it expects will be used to develop and implement future energy
conservation standards for commercial packaged boilers. DOE has
determined that this rule falls into a class of actions that are
categorically excluded from review under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and DOE's implementing
regulations at 10 CFR part 1021. Specifically, this proposed rule would
amend the existing test procedures without affecting the amount,
quality, or distribution of energy usage, and, therefore, would not
result in any environmental impacts. Thus, this rulemaking is covered
by Categorical Exclusion A5 under 10 CFR part 1021, subpart D, which
applies to any rulemaking that interprets or amends an existing rule
without changing the environmental effect of that rule. Accordingly,
neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact
statement is required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 10,
1999), imposes certain requirements on Federal agencies formulating and
implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that
have Federalism implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to
examine the constitutional and statutory authority supporting any
action that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States, and
to carefully assess the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order
also requires agencies to have an accountability process to ensure
meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have Federalism implications.
On March 14, 2000, DOE published a statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process it will follow in the
development of such regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has examined this
proposed rule and has determined that it would not have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. EPCA governs
and prescribes Federal preemption of State regulations as to energy
conservation for the equipment that is the subject of this proposed
rule. States can petition DOE for exemption from such preemption to the
extent, and based on criteria, set forth in EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d);
42 U.S.C. 6316(a)) No further action is required by Executive Order
13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
Regarding the review of existing regulations and the promulgation
of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil
Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996), imposes on Federal
agencies the general duty to adhere to the following requirements: (1)
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write regulations to
minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard for
[[Page 14663]]
affected conduct rather than a general standard; and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive Order
12988 specifically requires that Executive agencies make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) clearly specifies
the preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on
existing Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard
for affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden
reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting
clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the
Attorney General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires
Executive agencies to review regulations in light of applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine whether they are met
or it is unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has completed
the required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by
law, the proposed rule meets the relevant standards of Executive Order
12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. Pub. L. 104-4, sec. 201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531).
For a proposed regulatory action likely to result in a rule that may
cause the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one
year (adjusted annually for inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires a
Federal agency to publish a written statement that estimates the
resulting costs, benefits, and other effects on the national economy.
(2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit timely input by elected officers
of State, local, and Tribal governments on a proposed ``significant
intergovernmental mandate,'' and requires an agency plan for giving
notice and opportunity for timely input to potentially affected small
governments before establishing any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. On March 18, 1997,
DOE published a statement of policy on its process for
intergovernmental consultation under UMRA. 62 FR 12820; also available
at http://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel. DOE examined this
proposed rule according to UMRA and its statement of policy and
determined that the rule contains neither an intergovernmental mandate,
nor a mandate that may result in the expenditure of $100 million or
more in any year, so these requirements do not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
This rule would not have any impact on the autonomy or integrity of the
family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it is not
necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under Executive Order 12630, ``Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights'' 53 FR 8859 (March 18, 1988), that this regulation would not
result in any takings that might require compensation under the Fifth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the public under guidelines
established by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and
DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed this proposed rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in those
guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OMB,
a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected
benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use.
The proposed regulatory action to amend the test procedure for
measuring the energy efficiency of commercial packaged boilers is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. Moreover, it
would not have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy, nor has it been designated as a
significant energy action by the Administrator of OIRA. Therefore, it
is not a significant energy action, and, accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration Act of
1974
Under section 301 of the Department of Energy Organization Act
(Pub. L. 95-91; 42 U.S.C. 7101), DOE must comply with section 32 of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, as amended by the Federal
Energy Administration Authorization Act of 1977. (15 U.S.C. 788; FEAA)
Section 32 essentially provides in relevant part that, where a proposed
rule authorizes or requires use of commercial standards, the notice of
proposed rulemaking must inform the public of the use and background of
such standards. In addition, section 32(c) requires DOE to consult with
the Attorney General and the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) concerning the impact of the commercial or industry standards on
competition.
This proposed rule incorporates testing methods contained in the
commercial standard ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, ``2015 Standard for
Performance Rating of Commercial Space Heating Boilers.'' While this
NOPR proposes amendments that supplant various provisions of that
industry standard, the test procedure is largely adopted directly from
the commercial standard without amendment. DOE has evaluated this
standard and is unable to conclude whether it fully complies with the
requirements of section 32(b) of the FEAA, (i.e., that it was developed
in a manner that fully provides for public participation, comment, and
review). DOE will consult with the Attorney
[[Page 14664]]
General and the Chairwoman of the FTC concerning the impact on
competition of requiring manufacturers to use the test methods
contained in this industry standard prior to prescribing a final rule.
M. Description of Materials Incorporated by Reference
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to incorporate by reference certain
sections of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, ``2015 Standard for
Performance Rating of Commercial Space Heating Boilers.'' ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015 is an industry-accepted test procedure that provides
methods, requirements, and calculations for determining the thermal
and/or combustion efficiency of a commercial space heating boiler.
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 is available at http://www.ahrinet.org/App_Content/ahri/files/standards%20pdfs/ANSI%20standards%20pdfs/ANSI.AHRI_Standard_1500-2015.pdf.
V. Public Participation
A. Attendance at the Public Meeting
The time, date, and location of the public meeting are listed in
the DATES and ADDRESSES sections at the beginning of this document. If
you plan to attend the public meeting, please notify Ms. Brenda Edwards
at (202) 586-2945 or [email protected].
Please note that foreign nationals participating in the public
meeting are subject to advance security screening procedures which
require advance notice prior to attendance at the public meeting. Any
foreign national wishing to participate in the public meeting should
inform DOE as soon as possible by contacting Ms. Regina Washington at
(202) 586-1214 or by email: [email protected] so that the
necessary procedures can be completed.
DOE requires visitors with laptop computers and other devices, such
as tablets, to be checked upon entry into the building. Any person
wishing to bring these devices into the Forrestal Building will be
required to obtain a property pass. Visitors should avoid bringing
these devices, or allow an extra 45 minutes to check in. Please report
to the visitor's desk to have devices checked before proceeding through
security.
Due to the REAL ID Act implemented by the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), there have been recent changes regarding identification
(ID) requirements for individuals wishing to enter Federal buildings
from specific states and U.S. territories. As a result, driver's
licenses from the following states or territory will not be accepted
for building entry and one of the alternate forms of ID listed below
will be required. DHS has determined that regular driver's licenses
(and ID cards) from the following jurisdictions are not acceptable for
entry into DOE facilities: Alaska, American Samoa, Arizona, Louisiana,
Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Oklahoma, and Washington.
Acceptable alternate forms of Photo-ID include: U.S. Passport or
Passport Card; an Enhanced Driver's License or Enhanced ID-Card issued
by the states of Minnesota, New York or Washington (Enhanced licenses
issued by these states are clearly marked Enhanced or Enhanced Driver's
License); a military ID or other Federal government issued Photo-ID
card.
In addition, you can attend the public meeting via webinar. Webinar
registration information, participant instructions, and information
about the capabilities available to webinar participants will be
published on DOE's Web site at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=87. Participants are
responsible for ensuring their systems are compatible with the webinar
software.
B. Procedure for Submitting Prepared General Statements for
Distribution
Any person who has plans to present a prepared general statement
may request that copies of his or her statement be made available at
the public meeting. Such persons may submit requests, along with an
advance electronic copy of their statement in PDF (preferred),
Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format, to
the appropriate address shown in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning
of this NOPR. The request and advance copy of statements must be
received at least one week before the public meeting and may be
emailed, hand-delivered, or sent by mail. DOE prefers to receive
requests and advance copies via email. Please include a telephone
number to enable DOE staff to make a follow-up contact, if needed.
C. Conduct of the Public Meeting
DOE will designate a DOE official to preside at the public meeting
and may also use a professional facilitator to aid discussion. The
meeting will not be a judicial or evidentiary-type public hearing, but
DOE will conduct it in accordance with section 336 of EPCA (42 U.S.C.
6306). A court reporter will be present to record the proceedings and
prepare a transcript. DOE reserves the right to schedule the order of
presentations and to establish the procedures governing the conduct of
the public meeting. After the public meeting, interested parties may
submit further comments on the proceedings, as well as on any aspect of
the rulemaking, until the end of the comment period.
The public meeting will be conducted in an informal, conference
style. DOE will present summaries of comments received before the
public meeting, allow time for prepared general statements by
participants, and encourage all interested parties to share their views
on issues affecting this rulemaking. Each participant will be allowed
to make a general statement (within time limits determined by DOE),
before the discussion of specific topics. DOE will allow, as time
permits, other participants to comment briefly on any general
statements.
At the end of all prepared statements on a topic, DOE will permit
participants to clarify their statements briefly and comment on
statements made by others. Participants should be prepared to answer
questions by DOE and by other participants concerning these issues. DOE
representatives may also ask questions of participants concerning other
matters relevant to this rulemaking. The official conducting the public
meeting will accept additional comments or questions from those
attending, as time permits. The presiding official will announce any
further procedural rules or modification of the above procedures that
may be needed for the proper conduct of the public meeting.
A transcript of the public meeting will be included in the docket,
which can be viewed as described in the Docket section at the beginning
of this notice. In addition, any person may buy a copy of the
transcript from the transcribing reporter.
D. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this
proposed rule before or after the public meeting, but no later than the
date provided in the DATES section at the beginning of this proposed
rule. Interested parties may submit comments using any of the methods
described in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this proposed
rule.
Submitting comments via www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov Web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last
[[Page 14665]]
names, organization name (if any), and submitter representative name
(if any). If your comment is not processed properly because of
technical difficulties, DOE will use this information to contact you.
If DOE cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and
cannot contact you for clarification, DOE may not be able to consider
your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment itself or in any documents attached to your
comment. Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable
should not be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to
your comment. Persons viewing comments will see only first and last
names, organization names, correspondence containing comments, and any
documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (CBI)). Comments submitted through
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received through
the Web site will waive any CBI claims for the information submitted.
For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential Business
Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several
weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully uploaded your comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand delivery/courier, or mail.
Comments and documents submitted via email, hand delivery/courier, or
mail also will be posted to www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be publicly viewable, do not
include it in your comment or any accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information in a cover letter. Include your first
and last names, email address, telephone number, and optional mailing
address. The cover letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it
does not include any comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. If you submit via mail or hand
delivery/courier, please provide all items on a compact disc (CD), if
feasible, in which case it is not necessary to submit printed copies.
No telefacsimiles (faxes) will be accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, written in English, and are free of any defects or
viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email, postal mail, or hand delivery/courier two well-marked copies:
one copy of the document marked ``confidential'' including all the
information believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document
marked ``non-confidential'' with the information believed to be
confidential deleted. Submit these documents via email or on a CD, if
feasible. DOE will make its own determination about the confidential
status of the information and treat it according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat
submitted information as confidential include: (1) a description of the
items; (2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as
confidential within the industry; (3) whether the information is
generally known by or available from other sources; (4) whether the
information has previously been made available to others without
obligation concerning its confidentiality; (5) an explanation of the
competitive injury to the submitting person which would result from
public disclosure; (6) when such information might lose its
confidential character due to the passage of time; and (7) why
disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
Although DOE welcomes comments on any aspect of this proposal, DOE
is particularly interested in receiving comments and views of
interested parties concerning the following issues:
1. DOE seeks comment on its proposal to replace BTS-2000 with ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015 in its test procedure for commercial packaged
boilers (section III.A).
2. DOE seeks comment on its proposal to remove its definition for
packaged low pressure boiler and modify its definitions for commercial
packaged boiler (section III.B.1).
3. DOE seeks comment on its proposed definition for ``field-
constructed.'' (section III.B.2)
4. DOE seeks comment on the feasibility of conducting a combustion
efficiency test in the field for steam and hot water commercial
packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h
(section III.C.1).
5. DOE seeks comment on whether the thermal efficiency test can be
conducted for steam commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate
greater than 2,500,000 Btu/h and less than or equal to 5,000,000 Btu/h
(section III.C.1).
6. DOE seeks comment on the specific limitations, if they exist,
that preclude combustion efficiency testing in a laboratory setting for
steam commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than
2,500,000 Btu/h and less than or equal to 5,000,000 Btu/h (section
III.C.1).
7. DOE seeks comment on the specific additional equipment or
facilities and their associated cost that would be required to
accommodate testing commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate
greater than 2,500,000 Btu/h and less than or equal to 5,000,000 Btu/h
in a laboratory setting (section III.C.1).
8. DOE seeks comment on whether the 5,000,000 Btu/h fuel input rate
is an adequate threshold for the allowance of the field combustion test
and conversion methodology, and if not, what threshold should be used
(section III.C.1).
9. DOE seeks comment on whether certification should be permitted
for field tested units after distribution in commerce and after
commissioning, in particular the impact of this approach on building
inspectors (section III.C.1).
10. DOE seeks comment on its proposed conversion method for
calculating thermal efficiency based on combustion efficiency for steam
commercial packaged boilers with fuel
[[Page 14666]]
input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h (section III.C.2).
11. DOE seeks comment on the proposed value for the difference
between the combustion efficiency and thermal efficiency in the
conversion method (proposed value of 2 percent of the combustion
efficiency), whether the value would result in conservative ratings,
and what number DOE should use instead if the proposed value is not
adequate (section III.C.2).
12. DOE seeks comment on whether the 5,000,000 Btu/h fuel input
rate is an adequate threshold for the allowance of the field combustion
test and/or conversion methodology, and if not, what threshold should
be used (section III.C.2).
13. DOE seeks comment on if the field combustion test (for hot
water and steam commercial packaged boilers) and conversion methodology
(for steam commercial packaged boilers) do not adequately accommodate
commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000
Btu/h, what procedure should DOE implement in order to do so (section
III.C.2).
14. DOE seeks comments, data, and information about pressures
recommended by manufacturers and relevance to actual operating
conditions in buildings (section III.C.4).
15. DOE seeks comment on whether DOE should require testing to be
performed at the lowest possible steam pressure where steam quality
requirements can be met (section III.C.4).
16. DOE also requests comment on if there are any commercial
packaged boilers that require steam pressures greater than 15 psig to
maintain 2 percent moisture in the produced steam (see section
III.C.4).
17. DOE seeks comments, data, and information about whether the
proposed testing conditions related to water temperatures are
appropriate both for a non-condensing commercial packaged boiler and a
condensing commercial packaged boiler (section III.D.2).
18. DOE also requests comment on the proposed test provisions to
accommodate commercial packaged boilers that cannot be tested with a
temperature rise of 40[emsp14][deg]F across the commercial packaged
boiler (Point B to Point C); (section III.D.2).
19. DOE seeks additional comments, data, and analysis concerning
thermal efficiency test measurement uncertainty (section III.D.2).
20. DOE seeks comment regarding the current prevalence of using
recirculating loops in testing; specifically, DOE requests comment
about the kinds of commercial packaged boilers utilizing recirculation
loops and the conditions at which these commercial packaged boilers and
recirculating loops operate (section III.D.4).
21. DOE seeks further comments, data, and information concerning
the capabilities of test laboratories, particularly in light of the
specific proposed conditions contained in this NOPR (section III.D.4).
22. DOE seeks comments, data, and information about room ambient
relative humidity, whether the proposed constraints are appropriate,
and if not, what are appropriate constraints on room ambient relative
humidity when testing commercial packaged boilers (section III.E).
23. DOE seeks comment, data, and information about the
aforementioned proposed room ambient temperatures, whether the proposed
constraints are appropriate and if not, what are appropriate
constraints on room ambient temperature (section III.E)
24. DOE seeks comments based upon the proposed changes to the steam
riser, header, and return water loop requirements (section III.F).
25. DOE seeks comments regarding the specification of burners for
oil-fired commercial packaged boilers (section III.F).
26. DOE seeks additional comment, and particularly data, about
whether the oxygen combustion analyzer produces equivalent combustion
efficiencies to the carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide
(CO2) calculations provided by ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015
and BTS-2000 (section III.F).
27. DOE seeks comment on the proposal to require digital data
acquisition (section III.F).
28. DOE seeks comment as to the proposed clarifications in set up
and instrumentation (section III.F).
29. DOE seeks comment regarding its proposed definition and
methodology for measuring and verifying fuel input rate and steady-
state (section III.G).
30. DOE seeks comment on its proposed clerical corrections and
clarifications (section III.H).
31. DOE seeks comments, as well as sample stack temperature data,
sample calculations and estimates of the impact of the stack
temperature adjustment methodology (section III.I.1).
32. DOE seeks comment regarding its proposed provision to conduct
enforcement testing in both steam mode and hot water mode for those
commercial packaged boilers capable of producing both and using either
result in determining noncompliance with energy conservation standards.
(section III.I.1)
33. DOE seeks further comment concerning part-load testing (section
III.I.2).
34. DOE seeks comment on whether the proposed test procedure
changes will have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities (section IV.B).
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this notice of
proposed rulemaking.
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 429
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
10 CFR Part 431
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Incorporation by reference, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Test procedures.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 22, 2016.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DOE proposes to amend parts
429 and 431 of chapter II, subchapter D of title 10, Code of Federal
Regulations, as set forth below:
PART 429--CERTIFICATION, COMPLIANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 429 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6317.
0
2. Section 429.4 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 429.4 Materials incorporated by reference.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) AHRI Standard 1500-2015, ``2015 Standard for Performance Rating
of Commercial Space Heating Boilers,'' approved November 28, 2014:
Section 3 ``Definitions;''; Section 5 ``Rating Requirements;'' Appendix
C ``Methods of Testing for Rating Commercial Space Heating Boilers--
Normative,'' excluding Figures C5 and C7; Appendix D
[[Page 14667]]
``Properties of Saturated Steam--Normative;'' and Appendix E
``Correction Factors for Heating Values of Fuel Gases--Normative;'' IBR
approved for Sec. 429.60.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 429.11 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 429.11 General sampling requirements for selecting units to be
tested.
* * * * *
(b) The minimum number of units tested shall be no less than two,
except where:
(1) A different minimum limit is specified in Sec. Sec. 429.14
through 429.65; or
(2) Only one unit of the basic model is produced, in which case,
that unit must be tested and the test results must demonstrate that the
basic model performs at or better than the applicable standard(s). If
one or more units of the basic model are manufactured subsequently,
compliance with the default sampling and representations provisions is
required.
0
4. Section 429.60 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(i);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (a)(3), (4), and (5);
0
c. Revising paragraph (b)(2); and
0
d. Adding paragraphs (b)(3)(iii) and (b)(5).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 429.60 Commercial packaged boilers.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) If the represented value is determined through testing, the
general requirements of Sec. 429.11 are applicable, except that, if
the represented value is determined through testing pursuant to Sec.
431.86(c) of this chapter, the number of units selected for testing may
be one; and
* * * * *
(3) The representative value of fuel input rate of a basic model
reported in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section must be
either the mean of the fuel input rate(s) measured for each tested unit
of the basic model and determined in accordance with the test procedure
in Sec. 431.86 of this chapter, or the value determined with an AEDM,
and rounded to the nearest 1,000 Btu/h.
(4) The representative value of thermal or combustion efficiency of
a basic model reported in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this
section must be either the mean of the thermal or combustion efficiency
measured for each tested unit of the basic model and determined in
accordance with the test procedure in Sec. 431.86 of this chapter, or
the value determined with an AEDM, and rounded to the nearest tenth of
one percent.
(5) For a model of commercial packaged boiler capable of supplying
either steam or hot water, representative values for steam mode must be
based on performance in steam mode and representative values for hot
water mode must be based on either the efficiency in hot water mode or
steam mode in accordance with the test procedure in Sec. 431.86 of
this chapter and the provisions of this section.
(b) * * *
(2) Pursuant to Sec. 429.12(b)(13), a certification report must
include the following public, equipment-specific information:
(i) The manufacturer (including brand, if applicable) and model
number of the burner;
(ii) The fuel input rate in British thermal units per hour (Btu/h)
rounded to the nearest 1,000 Btu/h;
(iii) The representative value of combustion efficiency in percent
(%) to the nearest tenth of one percent or the representative value of
thermal efficiency in percent (%) to the nearest one tenth of one
percent, as specified in Sec. 431.87 of this chapter; and
(iv) For a basic model of commercial packaged boiler that cannot be
tested using the standard inlet temperatures required in appendix A to
subpart E of part 431 of this chapter, the average inlet water
temperature measured at Point B (in Figure C9 of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015) (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 429.4) at which the
model was tested.
(3) * * *
(iii) For basic models of commercial packaged boilers that have a
certified fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h, a declaration
about whether the certified rating is based on testing conducted
pursuant to Sec. 431.86(c) of this chapter.
* * * * *
(5) Any field tested (pursuant to Sec. 431.86(c) of this chapter)
basic model of a commercial packaged boiler that has not been
previously certified through testing or an AEDM must be certified
within 15 days of commissioning.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 429.70 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(D) to read
as follows:
Sec. 429.70 Alternative methods for determining energy efficiency and
energy use.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(D) An AEDM that is validated based on test results obtained from
one or more field tests (commercial packaged boilers only) can only be
used to certify the performance of basic models of commercial packaged
boilers with a certified fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h.
* * * * *
0
6. Section 429.110 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(3); and
0
b. Adding paragraph (c)(1)(iii).
The addition and revision reads as follows:
Sec. 429.110 Enforcement testing.
(a) * * *
(3) Testing will be conducted at a lab accredited to the
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), ``General requirements `for the
competence of testing and calibration laboratories,'' ISO/IEC
17025:2005(E) (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 429.4). If testing
cannot be completed at an independent lab, DOE, at its discretion, may
allow enforcement testing at a manufacturer's lab, so long as the lab
is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E) and DOE representatives witness
the testing. In addition, for commercial packaged boilers with
certified fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h, DOE, at its
discretion, may allow enforcement testing of a commissioned commercial
packaged boiler in the location in which it was commissioned for use,
pursuant to the test provisions at Sec. 431.86(c) of this chapter.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Of basic models of previously commissioned commercial
packaged boilers with a certified fuel input rate greater than
5,000,000 Btu/h, DOE may test a sample of at least one unit in the
location in which it was commissioned for use.
* * * * *
0
7. Section 429.134 is amended by adding paragraph (k) to read as
follows:
Sec. 429.134 Product-specific enforcement provisions.
* * * * *
(k) Commercial packaged boilers--(1) Verification of fuel input
rate. The fuel input rate of each tested unit will be measured pursuant
to the test requirements of Sec. 431.86 of this chapter. The results
of the measurement(s) will be compared to the value of fuel input rate
certified by the manufacturer. The certified fuel input rate will be
[[Page 14668]]
considered valid only if the measurement(s) (either the measured fuel
input rate for a single unit sample or the average of the measured fuel
input rates for a multiple unit sample) is within two percent of the
certified fuel input rate.
(i) If the representative value of fuel input rate is found to be
valid, the certified fuel input rate will serve as the basis for
determination of the appropriate equipment class(es) and the mean
measured fuel input rate will be used as the basis for calculation of
combustion and/or thermal efficiency for the basic model.
(ii) If the representative value of fuel input rate is not within
two percent of the certified fuel input rate, DOE will first attempt to
increase or decrease the gas pressure within the range specified in
manufacturer's installation and operation manual shipped with the
commercial packaged boiler being tested (or, if not provided in the
manual, in supplemental instructions provided by the manufacturer
pursuant to Sec. 429.60(b)(4)) to achieve the certified fuel input
rate (within two percent). If the fuel input rate is still not within
two percent of the certified fuel input rate, DOE will attempt to
modify the gas inlet orifice. If the fuel input rate still is not
within two percent of the certified fuel input rate, the mean measured
fuel input rate will serve as the basis for determination of the
appropriate equipment class(es) and calculation of combustion and/or
thermal efficiency for the basic model.
(2) Models capable of producing both hot water and steam. For a
model of commercial packaged boiler that is capable of producing both
hot water and steam, DOE may measure the thermal or combustion
efficiency as applicable pursuant to Sec. 431.87 of this chapter for
steam and/or hot water modes. DOE will evaluate compliance based on the
measured thermal or combustion efficiency in steam and hot water modes,
independently.
PART 431--ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT
0
8. The authority citation for part 431 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6317.
0
9. Section 431.82 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the definitions for ``Combustion efficiency'' and
``Commercial packaged boiler'';
0
b. Adding in alphabetical order definitions for ``Field-constructed,''
and ``Fuel input rate'';
0
c. Revising the definition for ``Packaged boiler''; and
0
d. Removing the definitions for ``Packaged high pressure boiler'' and
``Packaged low pressure boiler''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 431.82 Definitions concerning commercial packaged boilers.
* * * * *
Combustion efficiency for a commercial packaged boiler is a
measurement of how much of the fuel input energy is converted to useful
heat in combustion and is calculated as 100 percent minus percent flue
loss, as determined with the test procedures prescribed under Sec.
431.86.
Commercial packaged boiler means a packaged boiler that meets all
of the following criteria:
(1) Has fuel input rate of 300,000 Btu/h or greater;
(2) Is, to any significant extent, distributed in commerce for
space conditioning and/or service water heating in buildings but does
not meet the definition of ``hot water supply boiler'' in this part;
(3) Does not meet the definition of ``field-constructed'' in this
section; and
(4) Is designed to:
(i) Operate at a steam pressure at or below 15 psig;
(ii) Operate at or below a water pressure of 160 psig and water
temperature of 250[emsp14][deg]F; or
(iii) Operate at the conditions specified in both paragraphs (4)(i)
and (ii) of this definition.
* * * * *
Field-constructed means custom-designed equipment that requires
welding of structural components in the field during installation; for
the purposes of this definition, welding does not include attachment
using mechanical fasteners or brazing; any jackets, shrouds, venting,
burner, or burner mounting hardware are not structural components.
* * * * *
Fuel input rate for a commercial packaged boiler means the maximum
rate at which the commercial packaged boiler uses energy and is
determined using test procedures prescribed under Sec. 431.86.
* * * * *
Packaged boiler means a boiler that is shipped complete with
heating equipment, mechanical draft equipment, and automatic controls
and is usually shipped in one or more sections. If the boiler is
shipped in more than one section, the sections may be produced by more
than one manufacturer, and may be originated or shipped at different
times and from more than one location.
* * * * *
0
10. Section 431.85 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 431.85 Materials incorporated by reference.
* * * * *
(b) AHRI. Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute,
2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201, (703) 524-8800, or
go to: http://www.ahrinet.org.
(1) AHRI Standard 1500-2015, ``2015 Standard for Performance Rating
of Commercial Space Heating Boilers,'' approved November 28, 2014:
Section 3 ``Definitions;''; Section 5 ``Rating Requirements;'' Appendix
C ``Methods of Testing for Rating Commercial Space Heating Boilers--
Normative,'' excluding Figures C5 and C7; Appendix D ``Properties of
Saturated Steam--Normative;'' and Appendix E ``Correction Factors for
Heating Values of Fuel Gases--Normative;'' IBR approved for appendix A
to subpart E.
(2) [Reserved]
0
11. Section 431.86 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 431.86 Uniform test method for the measurement of energy
efficiency of commercial packaged boilers.
(a) Scope. This section provides test procedures, pursuant to the
Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), as amended, which must be
followed for measuring the combustion efficiency and/or thermal
efficiency of a gas- or oil-fired commercial packaged boiler.
(b) Testing and calculations. Determine the thermal efficiency or
combustion efficiency of covered commercial packaged boilers by
conducting the appropriate test procedure(s) indicated in Table 1 of
this section.
[[Page 14669]]
Table 1 to Sec. 431.86--Test Requirements for Commercial Packaged Boiler Equipment Classes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test procedure
(corresponding to
Fuel Input Rate Standards standards
Equipment Type Subcategory Btu/h efficiency rating efficiency metric
(Sec. 431.87) required by Sec.
431.87)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hot Water....................... Gas-fired......... >=300,000 and Thermal Efficiency Appendix A,
<=2,500,000. Section 2.
Hot Water....................... Gas-fired......... >2,500,000........ Combustion Appendix A,
Efficiency. Section 3.
Hot Water....................... Oil-fired......... >=300,000 and Thermal Efficiency Appendix A,
<=2,500,000. Section 2.
Hot Water....................... Oil-fired......... >2,500,000........ Combustion Appendix A,
Efficiency. Section 3.
Steam........................... Gas-fired (all*).. >=300,000 and Thermal Efficiency Appendix A,
<=2,500,000. Section 2.
Steam........................... Gas-fired (all*).. >2,500,000 and Thermal Efficiency Appendix A,
<=5,000,000. Section 2.
>5,000,000........ Thermal Efficiency Appendix A,
Section 2.
OR
Appendix A,
Section 3 with
Section 2.4.3.2.
Steam........................... Oil-fired......... >=300,000 and Thermal Efficiency Appendix A,
<=2,500,000. Section 2.
Steam........................... Oil-fired......... >2,500,000 and Thermal Efficiency Appendix A,
<=5,000,000. Section 2.
>5,000,000........ Thermal Efficiency Appendix A,
Section 2.
OR
Appendix A,
Section 3. with
Section 2.4.3.2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Product classes for commercial packaged boilers as of July 22, 2009 (74 FR 36355) distinguish between gas-
fired natural draft and all other gas-fired (except natural draft). The test procedure indicated in Table 1
applies to both of these equipment classes. If these equipment classes are amended, the test procedure will
continue to apply as indicated in Table 1 to all gas-fired commercial packaged boilers.
(c) Field tests. The field test provisions of appendix A may be
used only to test a commissioned unit of commercial packaged boiler
with fuel input rate greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h.
0
12. Section 431.87 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 431.87 Energy conservation standards and their effective dates.
(a) Each commercial packaged boiler listed in Table 1 of this
section and manufactured on or after the effective date listed must
meet the indicated energy conservation standard.
Table 1 to Sec. 431.87--Commercial Packaged Boiler Energy Conservation Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Efficiency level--
Equipment type Subcategory Fuel input rate* effective date: March 2,
2012 *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hot Water Commercial Packaged Gas-fired............. >=300,000 Btu/h and 80.0% ET.
Boilers. <=2,500,000 Btu/h.
Hot Water Commercial Packaged Gas-fired............. >2,500,000 Btu/h...... 82.0% EC.
Boilers.
Hot Water Commercial Packaged Oil-fired............. >=300,000 Btu/h and 82.0% ET.
Boilers. <=2,500,000 Btu/h.
Hot Water Commercial Packaged Oil-fired............. >2,500,000 Btu/h...... 84.0% EC.
Boilers.
Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers.. Gas-fired--all, except >=300,000 Btu/h and 79.0% ET.
natural draft. <=2,500,000 Btu/h.
Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers.. Gas-fired--all, except >2,500,000 Btu/h...... 79.0% ET.
natural draft.
Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers.. Gas-fired--natural >=300,000 Btu/h and 77.0% ET.
draft. <=2,500,000 Btu/h.
Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers.. Gas-fired--natural >2,500,000 Btu/h...... 77.0% ET.
draft.
Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers.. Oil-fired............. >=300,000 Btu/h and 81.0% ET.
<=2,500,000 Btu/h.
Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers.. Oil-fired............. >2,500,000 Btu/h...... 81.0% ET.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* ``Fuel Input Rate'' is the representative value of input (Btu/h) of the commercial packaged boiler model.
* Where EC is combustion efficiency and ET is thermal efficiency.
(b) Each commercial packaged boiler listed in Table 2 of this
section and manufactured on or after the effective date listed in Table
2 of this section must meet the indicated energy conservation standard.
[[Page 14670]]
Table 2 to Sec. 431.87--Commercial Packaged Boiler Energy Conservation Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Efficiency level--
Equipment type Subcategory Fuel input rate * effective date: March 2,
2022 *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers... Gas-fired--natural >=300,000 Btu/h and 79.0% ET.
draft. <=2,500,000 Btu/h.
Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers... Gas-fired--natural >2,500,000 Btu/h....... 79.0% ET.
draft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* ``Fuel Input Rate'' is the representative value of input (Btu/h) of the commercial packaged boiler model
* Where ET is thermal efficiency.
0
13. Add appendix A to subpart E of part 431 to read as follows:
Appendix A to Subpart E of Part 431--Uniform Test Method for the
Measurement of Thermal Efficiency of Commercial Packaged Boilers.
Note: Prior to [DATE 360 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF THE FINAL
RULE IN THE Federal Register], manufacturers must make any
representations with respect to the energy use or efficiency of
commercial packaged boilers in accordance with the results of
testing pursuant to appendix A to subpart E of part 431 or the test
procedures as they appeared in 10 CFR 431.86, revised as of January
1, 2016. After [DATE 360 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THE FINAL
RULE], manufacturers must make any representations with respect to
energy use or efficiency in accordance with the results of testing
pursuant to this appendix.
1. Definitions
For purposes of this appendix, the Department of Energy
incorporates by reference the definitions established in section 3
of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and Air-
Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) Standard
1500, ``2015 Standard for Performance Rating of Commercial Space
Heating Boilers,'' beginning with 3.1 and ending with 3.35
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 431.85; hereafter ``ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015''), excluding section 3.23, ``Input Rating'';
section 3.24, ``Net Rating''; and section 3.26, ``Published
Rating,'' and section 3.26.1 ``Standard Rating.'' In cases where
there is a conflict, the language of the test procedure in this
appendix takes precedence over ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
1.1. In all incorporated sections of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015, references to the manufacturer's ``specifications,''
``recommendations,'' ``directions,'' or ``requests'' mean the
manufacturer's instructions in the installation and operation manual
shipped with the commercial packaged boiler being tested or in
supplemental instructions provided by the manufacturer pursuant to
Sec. 429.60(b)(4) of this chapter. For parameters or considerations
not specified in this appendix, refer to the manual shipped with the
commercial packaged boiler. Should the manual shipped with the
commercial packaged boiler not provide the necessary information,
refer to the supplemental instructions for the basic model pursuant
to Sec. 429.60(b)(4) of this chapter. The supplemental instructions
provided pursuant to Sec. 429.60(b)(4) of this chapter do not
replace or alter any requirements in this appendix nor do they
override the manual shipped with the commercial packaged boiler. In
cases where these supplemental instructions conflict with any
instructions or provisions provided in the manual shipped with the
commercial packaged boiler, use the manual shipped with the
commercial packaged boiler.
1.2. Unless otherwise noted, in all incorporated sections of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, the term ``boiler'' means a commercial
packaged boiler as defined in Sec. 431.82.
2. Thermal Efficiency Test
2.1. Test Setup.
2.1.1. Instrumentation. Use instrumentation meeting the minimum
requirements found in Table C1 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 431.85).
2.1.2. Data collection and sampling. Unless otherwise specified
in Table 2.1 to this appendix, obtain all data digitally and conduct
sampling at a rate not less frequently than once per 30 seconds.
Digital data representing a flow, rate, or flux must be integrated
over 15-minute periods (pursuant to Table 2.1 to this appendix) with
the resulting values recorded. All other digital data must be
averaged over 15-minute periods with the resulting values recorded.
Table 2.1 to this appendix specifies the data recording interval for
all relevant measured quantities and replaces Table C4 of Appendix C
of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
[[Page 14671]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17MR16.004
2.1.3. Instrument Calibration. Instruments must be calibrated at
least once per year and a calibration record containing the date of
calibration and the method of calibration must be maintained as part
of the data underlying each basic model certification, pursuant to
Sec. 429.71 of this chapter. Combustion measurement equipment
(instruments listed in the ``Gas Chemistry'' row of Table C1 in
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015) must be calibrated using standard
gases with purities of greater than 99.9995 percent for all
constituents analyzed.
2.1.4. Test Setup and Apparatus. Set up the commercial packaged
boiler for thermal efficiency testing according to the provisions of
section C2 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
2.1.4.1. For tests of oil-fired commercial packaged boilers,
determine the weight of
[[Page 14672]]
fuel consumed using one of the methods specified in paragraph
2.1.4.1.1. or 2.1.4.1.2. of this appendix:
2.1.4.1.1. If using a scale, determine the weight of fuel
consumed as the difference between the weight of the oil vessel
before and after each measurement period, as specified in paragraph
2.1.4.1.3.1. or 2.1.4.1.3.2. of this appendix, determined using a
scale meeting the accuracy requirements of Table C1 of Appendix C of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
2.1.4.1.2. If using a flow meter, first determine the volume of
fuel consumed as the total volume over the applicable measurement
period as specified in paragraph 2.1.4.1.3.1. or 2.1.4.1.3.2. of
this appendix and as measured by a flow meter meeting the accuracy
requirements of Table C1 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015 upstream of the oil inlet port of the commercial packaged
boiler. Then determine the weight of fuel consumed by multiplying
the total volume of fuel over the applicable measurement period by
the density of oil, in pounds per gallon, as determined pursuant to
C3.2.1.1.3. of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
2.1.4.1.3. The applicable measurement period for the purposes of
determining fuel input rate must be as specified in section
2.1.4.1.3.1. of this appendix for the ``Warm-Up Period'' or section
2.1.4.1.3.2. of this appendix for the ``Test Period.''
2.1.4.1.3.1. For the purposes of confirming steady-state
operation during the ``Warm-Up Period,'' the measurement period must
be 15 minutes and tT in equation C2 in section C7.2.3.1
of Appendix A of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 must be 0.25 hours to
determine fuel input rate.
2.1.4.1.3.2. For the purposes of determining thermal efficiency
during the ``Test Period,'' the measurement period and tT
are as specified in section C4.1.1.2.3 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015.
2.1.4.2 For tests of gas-fired commercial packaged boilers,
install a volumetric gas meter meeting the accuracy requirements of
Table C1 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 upstream of
the gas inlet port of the commercial packaged boiler. Record the
accumulated gas volume consumed for each applicable measurement
period. Use equation C7.2.3.2. of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 to calculate fuel input rate.
2.1.4.2.1. The applicable measurement period for the purposes of
determining fuel input rate must be as specified in section
2.1.4.2.1.1. of this appendix for the ``Warm-Up Period'' and
2.1.4.2.1.2. of this appendix for the ``Test Period.''
2.1.4.2.1.1. For the purposes of confirming steady-state
operation during the ``Warm-Up Period,'' the measurement period must
be 15 minutes and tT in equation C2 in section C7.2.3.1
of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 must be 0.25 hours to
determine fuel input rate.
2.1.4.2.1.2. For the purposes of determining thermal efficiency
during the ``Test Period,'' the measurement period and tT
are as specified in section C4.1.1.2.3 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015.
2.1.5. Additional Requirements for Outdoor Commercial Packaged
Boilers. If the manufacturer provides more than one outdoor venting
arrangement, the outdoor commercial packaged boiler (as defined in
section 3.2.6 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015; must be tested with
the shortest total venting arrangement as measured by adding the
straight lengths of venting supplied with the equipment. If the
manufacturer does not provide an outdoor venting arrangement,
install the outdoor commercial packaged boiler venting consistent
with the procedure specified in section C2.2 of Appendix C of ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
2.1.6. Additional Requirements for Steam Tests. In addition to
the provisions of section C2 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015, the following requirements apply for steam tests.
2.1.6.1. Set up steam piping according to section C2.3 of
Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 and using the following
general instructions:
2.1.6.1.1. Figures C5 and C7 are prohibited from use and are not
to be used to comply with the test procedure.
2.1.6.1.2. For piping above the water level specified in the
installation and operation manual shipped with the commercial
packaged boiler, or in manufacturer's supplemental instructions
(pursuant to Sec. 429.60(b)(4) of this chapter), if a reduction in
the piping diameter is necessary, reduce the vertical portion of the
steam condensate return pipe diameter to no less than one half of
the riser pipe diameter.
2.1.6.1.3. Insulate all steam piping from the commercial
packaged boiler to the steam separator, and extend insulation at
least one foot (1 ft.) beyond the steam separator, using insulation
meeting the requirements specified in Table 2.2. of this appendix.
Table 2.2. to Appendix A to Subpart E of Part 431--Minimum Piping Insulation Thickness Requirements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insulation conductivity Nominal pipe size
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conductivity
Fluid temperature range [deg]F BTUxin/ (h x Mean rating 1 to < 1\1/ 1\1/2\ to <
ft\2\ x temperature inches <1 2\ 4 4 to <8
[deg]F) [deg]F
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
201 [deg]F-250 [deg]F................................ 0.27-0.30 150 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0
141 [deg]F-200 [deg]F................................ 0.25-0.29 125 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0
105 [deg]F-140 [deg]F................................ 0.22-0.28 100 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.1.6.1.4. If a separator is used, piping must pitch downward to
the separator at a rate of at least \1/4\ inch per foot of pipe
length.
2.1.6.2. If the pipe diameters of the header and return loop are
not specified in the installation and operation manual shipped with
the commercial packaged boiler or in supplemental testing
instructions provided in the unit's basic model certification report
(pursuant to Sec. 429.60 of this chapter), then make the header
pipe diameter equal to the commercial packaged boiler's steam take-
off fitting pipe diameter. Do not reduce the diameter in any
horizontal pipe. For commercial packaged boilers with multiple steam
risers, do not reduce the diameter in any horizontal header pipe,
and ensure that the cross-sectional area of the header is not less
than 80 percent of the total cross-sectional area of the risers.
2.1.6.3. If the height of the header above the water level is
not specified by the installation and operation manual shipped with
the commercial packaged boiler or in supplemental testing
instructions provided in the unit's basic model certification report
(pursuant to Sec. 429.60 of this chapter), then ensure that the
height of the header above the water level is not less than the
larger of 24 inches or 6 times the header nominal pipe diameter as
defined in paragraph 2.1.6.2. of this appendix.
2.1.6.4. If the minimum distance between the last vertical steam
take-off and the condensate return pipe is not specified in the
installation and operation manual shipped with the commercial
packaged boiler or in the manufacturer's supplemental testing
instructions provided in the unit's basic model certification report
(pursuant to Sec. 429.60 of this chapter), then the distance
between the vertical steam take-off leading to the water separator
and the elbow leading to the condensate return pipe must be a
minimum of three (3) header pipe diameters.
2.1.6.5. A vented water seal must be located between the drain
and the separator. Insulate the separator and the piping connecting
it to the commercial packaged boiler to prevent the heat loss from
separator and piping, using the minimum piping insulation
requirements specified in Table 2.2. of this appendix. A temperature
sensing device must be installed in the insulated steam piping prior
to the water separator if the commercial packaged boiler produces
superheated steam.
2.1.6.6. Water entrained in the steam and water condensing
within the steam piping must be collected and used to calculate the
[[Page 14673]]
quality of steam during the ``Test Period.'' Steam condensate must
be collected and measured using either a cumulative (totalizing)
flow rate or by measuring the mass of the steam condensate.
Instrumentation used to determine the amount of steam condensate
must meet the requirements identified in Table C1 in Appendix C of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
2.1.6.7. All steam commercial packaged boiler setups must
include a steam condensate return pipe as shown in Figures C6 and C8
of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015; labeled ``Return Loop
Connection''). This setup may also be used for commercial packaged
boilers with multiple or single steam risers (take-offs) from the
commercial packaged boiler.
2.1.6.8. Section C2.7.2.2.2 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 is
not to be used for water meter calibration.
2.1.7. Additional Requirements for Water Tests. In addition to
the provisions of section C2 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015, the following requirements apply for water tests.
2.1.7.1 Insulate all water piping between the commercial
packaged boiler and the location of the temperature measuring
equipment, including one foot (1 ft.) beyond the sensor, using
insulation meeting the requirements specified in Table 2.2. of this
appendix.
2.1.7.2 In addition to the temperature measuring device at Point
A in Figure C9 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, install a
temperature measuring device at Point B of the same figure.
2.2. Test Conditions.
2.2.1. General. Use the test conditions from section 5 and
section C3 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 for thermal
efficiency testing but do not use section 5.1, 5.2, 5.3.5, 5.3.8,
5.3.9, or C3.1.3 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
2.2.2. Burners for Oil-Fired Commercial Packaged Boilers. In
addition to section C3.3 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015, the following applies: for oil-fired commercial packaged
boilers, test the unit with the particular make and model of burner
as certified by the manufacturer. If multiple burners are specified
in the certification report for that basic model, then use any of
the listed burners for testing.
2.2.3. Non-condensing Commercial Packaged Boiler Water
Temperatures. For tests of non-condensing boilers (as defined in
section 3.2.5 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, maintain the outlet
temperature measured at Point C in Figure C9 at 180[emsp14][deg]F
1[emsp14][deg]F and maintain the inlet temperature
measured at Point B at 140[emsp14][deg]F
1[emsp14][deg]F during the ``Warm-up Period'' and ``Test Period'' as
indicated by 30-second interval data pursuant to Table 2.1. of this
appendix. If the commercial packaged boiler cannot be tested at the
standard inlet water temperature of 140[emsp14][deg]F
1[emsp14][deg]F, as indicated in the manufacturer literature, test
the equipment at the temperature closest to the standard
140[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F that the equipment is
capable of operating, as indicated in the manufacturer literature.
Use the inlet temperature measured at Point A in Figure C9 of
Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 for calculation of
thermal efficiency.
2.2.4. Condensing Commercial Packaged Boiler Water Temperatures.
For tests of condensing boilers (as defined in section 3.2.2 of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015); maintain the outlet temperature
measured at Point C in Figure C9 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 to 120[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F, and
maintain the commercial packaged boiler inlet temperature at Point B
to 80[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F during the ``Warm-
up Period'' and ``Test Period'' as indicated by 30-second interval
data pursuant to Table 2.1. of this appendix. If the commercial
packaged boiler cannot be tested at the standard inlet water
temperature of 80[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F, as
indicated in the manufacturer literature, test the equipment at the
temperature closest to the standard 80[emsp14][deg]F
1[emsp14][deg]F that the equipment is capable of operating, as
indicated in the manufacturer literature. Use the inlet temperature
measured at Point A in Figure C9 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 for calculation of thermal efficiency.
2.2.5 Air Temperature. Maintain ambient room temperature at
75[emsp14][deg]F 5[emsp14][deg]F at all times during
the ``Warm-up Period'' and ``Test Period'' (as described in section
C4 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015; as indicated by
30-second interval data pursuant to Table 2.1. of this appendix. The
ambient room temperature may not differ by more than
2[emsp14][deg]F from the average ambient room temperature during the
entire ``Test Period'' at any reading.
2.2.6. Ambient Humidity. Maintain ambient room relative humidity
at 60 5 percent relative humidity at all times during
both the ``Warm-up Period'' and ``Test Period'' (as described in
section C4 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015; as
indicated by 30-second interval data pursuant to Table 2.1. of this
appendix.
2.3. Test Method.
2.3.1. General. Conduct the thermal efficiency test as
prescribed in section C4.1 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015.
2.3.1.1. Do not use section C4.1.1.1.2 of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015. Instead, adjust oil or non-atmospheric gas to produce the
required firebox pressure and CO2 or O2
concentration in the flue gas, as described in section 5.3.1 of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. Conduct steam tests with steam
pressure at the pressure specified in the manufacturer literature
shipped with the commercial packaged boiler or in the manufacturer's
supplemental testing instructions pursuant to Sec. 429.60(b)(4) of
this chapter, but not exceeding 15 psig. If no pressure is specified
in the manufacturer literature shipped with the commercial packaged
boiler or in the manufacturer's supplemental testing instructions
(pursuant to Sec. 429.60(b)(4)) of this chapter, or if a range of
operating pressures is specified, conduct testing at a steam
pressure equal to atmospheric pressure. If necessary to maintain
steam quality as required by section 5.3.7 of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015, increase steam pressure in 1 psig increments by
throttling with a valve beyond the separator until the test is
completed and the steam quality requirements have been satisfied,
but do not increase the steam pressure to greater than 15 psig.
2.3.2. Steam Test Steady-State. Replace section C4.1.1.1.4 of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 with the following: Ensure that a
steady-state is reached by confirming that three consecutive
readings have been recorded at 15-minute intervals that indicate
that:
2.3.2.1. The measured fuel input rate does not vary by more than
2 percent between any two readings; and
2.3.2.2. The steam pressure varies by no more than
5 percent between any two readings.
2.3.3. Water Test Steady-State. Replace section C4.1.2.1.5 of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 with the following: Ensure that a
steady-state is reached by confirming that three consecutive
readings have been recorded at 15-minute intervals that indicate
that the measured fuel input rate does not vary by more than 2 percent between any two readings.
2.3.4. Condensate Collection for Condensing Commercial Packaged
Boilers. Collect condensate in a covered vessel so as to prevent
evaporation.
2.3.5. Total Fuel Input. In sections C4.1.1.2.3 and C4.1.2.2.3
of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, do not use the last sentence which
reads: ``The total Heat Input measured during the Test Period shall
be within 2% of the boiler Input Rating.''
2.4. Calculations.
2.4.1. General. To determine the thermal efficiency of
commercial packaged boilers, use the calculation procedure for the
thermal efficiency test specified in section C7 of Appendix C of the
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. For water tests as described in
section C4.1.2 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, if a recirculating
loop is used, use the average temperature during the ``Test Period''
measured at Point A for the inlet water temperature for all
calculations.
2.4.2. Use of Steam Properties Table. If the average measured
temperature of the steam is higher than the value in Table D in
Appendix D1 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 that corresponds to the
average measured steam pressure, then use Table 2.3 of this appendix
to determine the latent heat of superheated steam in (Btu/lb). Use
linear interpolation for determining the latent heat of steam in
Btu/lb if the measured steam pressure is between two values listed
in Table D in Appendix D1 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 or in
Table 2.3.
[[Page 14674]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17MR16.006
[[Page 14675]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17MR16.007
2.4.3. Alternative Thermal Efficiency Calculation for Large
Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers. To determine the thermal
efficiency of commercial packaged boilers with a fuel input rate
greater than 5,000,000 Btu/h according to the steam test (pursuant
to section C4.1.1 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, either:
2.4.3.1. Calculate the thermal efficiency of commercial packaged
boiler models in steam mode in accordance with the provisions of
section 2.4.1. of this appendix; or
2.4.3.2. Measure and calculate combustion efficiency
EffySS in steam mode according to section 3. Combustion
Efficiency Test of this appendix and convert to thermal efficiency
using the following equation:
EffyG + EffySS - 2.0
where EffyT is the thermal efficiency and
EffySS is the combustion efficiency as defined in C6 of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. The combustion efficiency
EffySS is as calculated in section C7.2.14 of ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015.
2.4.4. Rounding. Round the final thermal efficiency value to
nearest one tenth of one percent. Round fuel input rate to nearest
1,000 Btu/h.
3. Combustion Efficiency Test.
3.1. Test Setup.
3.1.1. Instrumentation. Use instrumentation meeting the minimum
requirements found in Table C1 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 431.85).
3.1.2. Data collection and sampling. Unless otherwise specified,
obtain all data digitally with the exception of measuring the weight
of the combustion condensate and steam condensation, and conduct
sampling at a rate not less than once per 30 seconds. Digital data
representing a flow, rate, or flux must be integrated over 15-minute
periods (pursuant to Table 3.1 of this appendix) with the resulting
values recorded. All other digital data must be averaged over 15-
minute periods with the resulting values recorded. Table 3.1. of
this appendix specifies the data recording interval for all relevant
measured quantities and replaces Table C4 of Appendix C in ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015.
[[Page 14676]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17MR16.008
[[Page 14677]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17MR16.009
3.1.3. Instrument Calibration. Instruments must be calibrated at
least once per year and a record must be kept as part of the data
underlying each basic model certification, pursuant to Sec. 429.71
of this chapter, containing, at least, the date of calibration and
the method of calibration. Combustion measurement equipment
(instruments listed in the ``Gas Chemistry'' row of Table C1 in
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015) must be calibrated using standard
gasses with purities of greater than 99.9995 percent for all
constituents analyzed.
3.1.4. Test Setup and Apparatus. Set up the commercial packaged
boiler for combustion efficiency testing according to the provisions
of section C2 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
3.1.4.1. For tests of oil-fired commercial packaged boilers,
determine the weight of fuel consumed using one of the methods
specified in paragraph 3.1.4.1.1. or 3.1.4.1.2. of this appendix:
3.1.4.1.1. If using a scale, determine the weight of fuel
consumed as the difference between the weight of the oil vessel
before and after each measurement period, as specified in paragraph
3.1.4.1.3.1. or 3.1.4.1.3.2. of this appendix, determined using a
scale meeting the accuracy requirements of Table C1 of ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015.
3.1.4.1.2. If using a flow meter, first determine the volume of
fuel consumed as the total volume over the applicable measurement
period, as specified in paragraphs 3.1.4.1.3.1. or 3.1.4.1.3.2. of
this appendix, and as measured by a flow meter meeting the accuracy
requirements of Table C1 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 upstream of
the oil inlet port of the commercial packaged boiler. Then determine
the weight of fuel consumed by multiplying the total volume of fuel
over the applicable measurement period by the density of oil, in
pounds per gallon, as determined pursuant to section C3.2.1.1.3. of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
3.1.4.1.3. The applicable measurement period for the purposes of
determining fuel input rate must be as specified in section
3.1.4.1.3.1. of this appendix for the ``Warm-Up Period'' or
3.1.4.1.3.2. of this appendix for the ``Test Period.''
3.1.4.1.3.1. For the purposes of confirming steady-state
operation during the ``Warm-Up Period,'' the measurement period must
be 15 minutes and tT in equation C2 in section C7.2.3.1
of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 must be 0.25 hours to determine fuel
input rate.
3.1.4.1.3.2. For the purposes of determining combustion
efficiency during the ``Test Period,'' the measurement period and
tT are 0.5 hours pursuant to section 3.3.1.1. of section
3. Combustion Efficiency of this appendix.
3.1.4.2 For tests of gas-fired commercial packaged boilers,
install a volumetric gas meter meeting the accuracy requirements of
Table C1 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 upstream of the gas inlet
port of the commercial packaged boiler. Record the accumulated gas
volume consumed for each applicable measurement period. Use equation
C7.2.3.2. of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 to calculate fuel input
rate.
3.1.4.2.1. The applicable measurement period for the purposes of
determining fuel input rate must be as specified in section
3.1.4.2.1.1. of this appendix for the ``Warm-Up Period'' and
3.1.4.2.1.2. of this appendix for the ``Test Period.''
3.1.4.2.1.1. For the purposes of confirming steady-state
operation during the ``Warm-Up Period,'' the measurement period must
be 15 minutes and tT in equation C2 in section C7.2.3.1
of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 must be 0.25 hours to determine fuel
input rate.
3.1.4.2.1.2. For the purposes of determining combustion
efficiency during the ``Test Period,'' the measurement period and
tT are 0.5 hours pursuant to section 3.3.1.1. of this
appendix.
3.1.5. Additional Requirements for Outdoor Commercial Packaged
Boilers. If the manufacturer provides more than one outdoor venting
arrangement, the outdoor commercial packaged boiler (as defined in
section 3.2.6 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015; must be tested with
the shortest total venting arrangement as measured by adding the
straight lengths of venting supplied with the equipment.
3.1.6. Additional Requirements for Field Tests.
3.1.6.1 Field tests are exempt from the requirements of section
C2.2 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. Measure the flue
gas temperature according to section C2.5.1 of Appendix C of ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015 and the thermocouple grids identified in
Figure C12 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, with the following
modification: the thermocouple grid may be staggered vertically by
up to 1.5 inches to allow the use of instrumented rods to be
inserted through holes drilled in the venting.
3.1.6.3. Field tests are exempt from the requirements of section
C2.6.3 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
3.1.7. Additional Requirements for Water Tests. In addition to
the provisions of section C2 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 431.85) and to the
temperature measuring device at Point A in Figure C9 of ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015, install a temperature
[[Page 14678]]
measuring device at Point B of the same figure.
3.2. Test Conditions.
3.2.1. General. Use the test conditions from sections 5 and C3
of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 for combustion
efficiency testing but do not use section 5.1, 5.3.5, 5.3.7
(excluded for field tests only), 5.3.8, 5.3.9, or C3.1.3 of ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
3.2.2. Burners for Oil-Fired Commercial Packaged Boilers. In
addition to section C3.3 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-
2015, the following applies: for oil-fired commercial packaged
boilers, test the unit with the particular make and model of burner
as certified by the manufacturer. If multiple burners are specified
in the certification report for that basic model, then use any of
the listed burners for testing.
3.2.3. Non-condensing Commercial Packaged Boiler Water
Temperatures. For tests of non-condensing boilers (as defined in
section 3.2.5 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015; maintain the outlet
temperature measured at Point C in Figure C9 to 180[emsp14][deg]F
1[emsp14][deg]F and maintain the inlet temperature
measured at Point B at 140[emsp14][deg]F
1[emsp14][deg]F during the ``Warm-up Period'' and ``Test Period'' as
verified by 30-second interval data pursuant to Table 3.1. of this
appendix. If the commercial packaged boiler cannot be tested at the
standard inlet water temperature of 140[emsp14][deg]F
1[emsp14][deg]F at Point B, as indicated in the manufacturer
literature, test the equipment at the temperature closest to the
standard 140[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F that the
equipment is capable of operating, as indicated in the manufacturer
literature. Field tests are exempt from this requirement and instead
must comply with the requirements of section 3.2.3.1 of this
appendix.
3.2.3.1. For field tests, the inlet temperature measured at
Point B in Figure C9 and the outlet temperature measured and Point C
in Figure C9 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 must be recorded in the
data underlying that model's certification pursuant to Sec. 429.71
of this chapter, and the difference between the inlet (measured at
Point B) and outlet temperature (measured at Point C) must not be
less than 20[emsp14][deg]F at any point during the ``Warm-up
Period'' and ``Test Period,'' after stabilization has been achieved,
as indicated by 30-second interval data pursuant to Table 3.1. of
this appendix.
3.2.4. Condensing Commercial Packaged Boiler Water Temperatures.
For tests of condensing boilers (as defined in section 3.2.2 of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015; maintain the outlet temperature
measured at Point C in Figure C9 to 120[emsp14][deg]F
1[emsp14][deg]F, and maintain the commercial packaged boiler inlet
temperature to 80[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F during
the ``Warm-up Period'' and ``Test Period'' as verified by 30-second
interval data pursuant to Table 3.1. of this appendix. If the
commercial packaged boiler cannot be tested at the standard inlet
water temperature of 80[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F
at Point B, as indicated in the manufacturer literature, test the
equipment at the temperature closest to the standard
80[emsp14][deg]F 1[emsp14][deg]F that the equipment is
capable of operating, as indicated in the manufacturer literature.
Field tests are exempt from this requirement and instead must comply
with the requirements of section 3.2.4.1 of this appendix.
3.2.4.1. For field tests, the inlet temperature measured at
Point B in Figure C9 and the outlet temperature measured and Point C
in Figure C9 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 must be recorded in the
data underlying that model's certification pursuant to Sec. 429.71
of this chapter, and the difference between the inlet (measured at
Point B) and outlet temperature (measured at Point C) must not be
less than 20[emsp14][deg]F at any point during the ``Warm-up
Period'' or ``Test Period,'' after stabilization has been achieved,
as verified by 30-second interval data pursuant to Table 3.1. of
this appendix.
3.2.5. Air Temperature. Maintain ambient room temperature at
75[emsp14][deg]F 5[emsp14][deg]F at all times during
the ``Warm-up Period'' and ``Test Period'' (as described in section
C4 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015; as indicated by
30-second interval data pursuant to Table 3.1. of this appendix. The
ambient room temperature may not differ by more than
2[emsp14][deg]F from the average ambient room temperature during the
entire ``Test Period'' at any reading. Field tests are exempt from
this requirement, but ambient room temperature must be recorded
(using 30-second interval data) as part of the test data underlying
that model's certification pursuant to Sec. 429.71 of this chapter.
3.2.6. Ambient Humidity. Maintain ambient room relative humidity
at 60 percent 5 percent relative humidity at all times
during both the ``Warm-up Period'' and ``Test Period'' (as described
in section C4 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015; as
indicated by 30-second interval data pursuant to Table 3.1. of this
appendix. Field tests are exempt from this requirement, but ambient
room relative humidity must be recorded (using 30-second interval
data) as part of the test data underlying that model's certification
pursuant to Sec. 429.71 of this chapter.
3.3. Test Method.
3.3.1. General. Conduct the combustion efficiency test using the
test method prescribed in section C4.1 ``Thermal Efficiency,'' of
Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015. Do not use section
C4.2.1 of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 and make the following
exceptions:
3.3.1.1. The duration of the ``Test Period'' outlined in
sections C4.1.1.2 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 431.85) and C4.1.2.2 of
Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 is 30 minutes.
3.3.1.2. In section C4.1.1.1.2 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI
Standard 1500-2015, replace ``Section 5.3.5'' with ``Section
5.3.6.''
3.3.2. Steam Test Steady-State. Replace section C4.1.1.1.4 of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 with the following: Ensure that a
steady-state is reached by confirming that three consecutive
readings have been recorded at 15-minute intervals that indicate
that:
3.3.2.1. The measured fuel input rate does not vary by more than
2 percent between any two readings; and
3.3.2.2. The steam pressure varies by no more than
5 percent between any two readings.
3.3.3. Water Test Steady-State. Replace section C4.1.2.1.5 of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 with the following: Ensure that a
steady-state is reached by confirming that three consecutive
readings have been recorded at 15-minute intervals that indicate
that the measured fuel input rate does not vary by more than 2 percent between any two readings.
3.3.4. Procedure for the Measurement of Condensate for a
Condensing Commercial Packaged Boiler. Collect flue condensate as
specified in section C4.2.2 of Appendix C of ANSI/AHRI Standard
1500-2015 using a covered vessel so as to prevent evaporation.
Measure the condensate from the flue gas during the ``Test Period.''
Flue condensate mass must be measured within 5 minutes after the end
of the ``Test Period'' (defined in C4.1.1.2 and C4.1.2.2 of ANSI/
AHRI Standard 1500-2015; to prevent evaporation loss from the
sample. Determine the mass of flue condensate for the ``Test
Period'' by subtracting the tare container weight from the total
weight of the container and flue condensate measured at the end of
the ''Warm-up Period.''
3.3.5. Total Fuel Input. In sections C4.1.1.2.3 and C4.1.2.2.3
of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015, do not use the last sentence which
reads: ``The total Heat Input measured during the Test Period shall
be within 2% of the boiler Input Rating.''
3.4. Calculations.
3.4.1. General. Use the calculation procedure for the combustion
efficiency test specified in section C7.3 of Appendix C (including
the specified subsections of C7.2) of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015.
If a recirculating loop is used, use the temperature at Point A for
the inlet water temperature for all calculations.
3.4.2. Adjustment to Steady-State Flue Temperature for Using
Steam Mode Combustion Efficiency to Represent Hot Water Mode. For
commercial packaged boilers with fuel input rate greater than
2,500,000 Btu/h and using combustion efficiency in steam mode to
represent combustion efficiency in hot water mode pursuant to Sec.
429.60(a)(5) through (6) of this chapter, adjust the steady-state
stack temperature TF,SS (as defined in section C6 of
ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015; using the following equation before
calculating combustion efficiency. Replace TF,SS with
TF,SS,adjusted as calculated below for all calculations
in deriving combustion efficiency.
[[Page 14679]]
TF,SS,adjusted = TF,SS - Tsat + 180
Where:
TF,SS,adjusted is the adjusted steady-state flue
temperature used for subsequent calculations of combustion
efficiency,
TF,SS is the measured steady-state flue temperature
during combustion efficiency testing in steam mode,
Tsat is the saturated steam temperature from Table D1 in
Appendix D of ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015 that corresponds to the
measured steam pressure, and
180 is the required hot water outlet temperature pursuant to section
3.2.3.
3.4.3. Rounding. Round combustion efficiency to nearest one
tenth of a percent. Round fuel input rate to nearest 1,000 Btu/h.
[FR Doc. 2016-05138 Filed 3-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P