[The Regulatory Plan and Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions]
[Federal Communications Commission Semiannual Regulatory Agenda]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part XVIII
Federal Communications Commission
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
[[Page 71458]]
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC)
_______________________________________________________________________
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Ch. I
Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions-Fall 2008
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
_______________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY: Twice a year, in spring and fall, the Commission publishes in
the Federal Register a list in the Unified Agenda of those major items
and other significant proceedings under development or review that
pertain to the Regulatory Flexibility Act. (U.S.C. 602). The Unified
Agenda also provides the Code of Federal Regulations citations and
legal authorities that govern these proceedings. The complete Unified
Agenda will be published on the Internet in a searchable format at
www.reginfo.gov.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maura McGowan, Telecommunications
Specialist, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554, (202) 418-0990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Unified Agenda of Major and Other Significant Proceedings
The Commission encourages public participation in its
rulemaking process. To help keep the public informed of significant
rulemaking proceedings, the Commission has prepared a list of
important proceedings now in progress. The General Services
Administration publishes the Unified Agenda in the Federal Register
in the spring and fall of each year.
The following terms may be helpful in understanding the status
of the proceedings included in this report:
Docket Number -- assigned to a proceeding if the Commission
has issued either a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking or a Notice of
Inquiry concerning the matter under consideration. The Commission
has used docket numbers since January 1, 1978. Docket numbers
consist of the last two digits of the calendar year in which the
docket was established plus a sequential number that begins at 1
with the first docket initiated during a calendar year (e.g.,
Docket No. 96-1 or Docket No. 99-1). The abbreviation for the
responsible bureau usually precedes the docket number, as in ``MM
Docket No. 96-222,'' which indicates that the responsible bureau is
the Mass Media Bureau (now the Media Bureau). A docket number
consisting of only five digits (e.g., Docket No. 29622) indicates
that the docket was established before January 1, 1978.
Notice of Inquiry (NOI) -- issued by the Commission when it is
seeking information on a broad subject or trying to generate ideas
on a given topic. A comment period is specified during which all
interested parties may submit comments.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) -- issued by the
Commission when it is proposing a specific change to Commission
rules and regulations. Before any changes are actually made,
interested parties may submit written comments on the proposed
revisions.
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) --issued by the
Commission when additional comment in the proceeding is sought.
Memorandum Opinion and Order (MO&O) -- issued by the
Commission to deny a petition for rulemaking, conclude an inquiry,
modify a decision, or address a petition for reconsideration of a
decision.
Rulemaking (RM) Number -- assigned to a proceeding after the
appropriate bureau or office has reviewed a petition for
rulemaking, but before the Commission has taken action on the
petition.
Report and Order (R&O) -- issued by the Commission to state a
new or amended rule or state that the Commission rules and
regulations will not be revised.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
CONSUMER AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS BUREAU--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
442 Policies and Rules Governing Interstate Pay-Per-Call and Other Information Services 3060-AG42
Pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (CC Docket Nos. 96-146, 93-22).........
443 Implementation of the Subscriber Selection Changes Provision of the Telecommunications 3060-AG46
Act of 1996 (CC Docket No. 94-129)....................................................
444 Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Access to Telecommunications 3060-AG58
Services Equipment and Customer Premise Equipment for Persons With Disabilities.......
445 In the Matter of the Telecommunications Relay Services, the Americans With 3060-AG75
Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (CC Docket No. 90-
571)..................................................................................
446 Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals 3060-AG76
With Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)...
447 Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 3060-AI14
1991 (CG Docket No. 02-278) (Section 610 Review)......................................
448 Rules and Regulations Implementing Section 225 of the Communications Act 3060-AI15
(Telecommunications Relay Service) (CG Docket No. 03-123) (Section 610 Review)........
449 Rules and Regulations Implementing the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited 3060-AI20
Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 (CG Docket No. 04-53)...........................
[[Page 71459]]
450 Rules and Regulations Implementing Minimum Customer Account Record Exchange (CARE) 3060-AI58
Obligations on All Local and Interexchange Carriers (CG Docket No. 02-386)............
451 Truth in Billing and Billing Format................................................... 3060-AI61
452 Closed Captioning of Video Programming................................................ 3060-AI72
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
453 Revision of the Rules Regarding Ultra-Wideband Transmission........................... 3060-AH47
454 New Advanced Wireless Services (ET Docket No. 00-258)................................. 3060-AH65
455 Transfer of the 3650 Through 3700 MHz Band From Federal Government Use (WT Docket No. 3060-AH75
05-96; ET Docket No. 02-380)..........................................................
456 Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields..................................... 3060-AI17
457 Unlicensed Operation of the 3650-3700 Band (ET Docket No. 04-151)..................... 3060-AI50
458 Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands (ET Docket No. 04-186)................. 3060-AI52
459 Unlicensed Devices and Equipment Approval (ET Docket No. 03-201)...................... 3060-AI54
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL BUREAU--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
460 Streamlining the Commission's Rules and Regulations for Satellite Application and 3060-AD70
Licensing Procedures (IB Docket No. 95-117)...........................................
461 Establishing Rules and Policies for the Use of Spectrum for Mobile Satellite Service 3060-AF89
in the L-Band (IB Docket No. 96-132)..................................................
462 Establishment of Rules and Policies for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service in 3060-AF93
the 2310-2360 MHz Frequency Band (IB Docket No. 95-91; GEN Docket No. 90-357).........
463 Allocate & Designate: Spec for Fixed-Sat Srv (37.5-38.5, 40.5-41.5 & 48.2-50.2 GHz 3060-AH23
Bands); Allocate: Fixed & Mobile 40.5-42.5 GHz; Wireless 46.9-47 GHz; Gov Oper 37-38 &
40-40.5 GHz (IB Docket No. 97)........................................................
464 Space Station Licensing Reform (IB Docket No. 02-34).................................. 3060-AH98
465 Mitigation of Orbital Debris (IB Docket No. 02-54).................................... 3060-AI06
466 Amendment of the Commission's Rules (IB Docket No. 04-47)............................. 3060-AI41
467 Reporting Requirements for U.S. Providers of International Telecommunications Services 3060-AI42
(IB Docket No. 04-112)................................................................
468 Review of the Spectrum Sharing Plan Among Non-Geostationary Satellite Orbit Mobile 3060-AI44
Satellite Service Systems in the 1.6/2.4 GHz Bands (IB Docket No. 02-364).............
469 Amendment of the Commission's Rules To Allocate Spectrum and Adopt Service Rules and 3060-AI90
Procedures To Govern the Use of Vehicle-Mounted Earth Stations (IB Docket No. 07-101).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEDIA BUREAU--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
470 Cable Television Rate Regulation...................................................... 3060-AF41
471 Cable Television Rate Regulation: Cost of Service..................................... 3060-AF48
472 Cable Home Wiring..................................................................... 3060-AG02
473 Competitive Availability of Navigation Devices (CS Docket No. 97-80).................. 3060-AG28
474 Cable Horizontal and Vertical Ownership Limits (MM Docket No. 92-264)................. 3060-AH09
475 Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems (MM Docket No. 99-325)............................. 3060-AH40
476 Second Periodic Review of Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to DTV.......... 3060-AH54
477 Direct Broadcast Public Interest Obligations (MM Docket No. 93-25).................... 3060-AH59
478 Revision of EEO Rules and Policies (MM Docket No. 98-204)............................. 3060-AH95
479 Broadcast Multiple and Cross-Ownership Limits......................................... 3060-AH97
[[Page 71460]]
480 Digital Broadcast Content Protection (MB Docket No. 02-230)........................... 3060-AI37
481 Establishment of Rules for Digital Low Power Television, Television Translator, and 3060-AI38
Television Booster Stations (MB Docket No. 03-185)....................................
482 Joint Sales Agreements in Local Television Markets (MB Docket No. 04-256)............. 3060-AI55
483 Significantly Viewed Out-of-Market Broadcast Stations (MB Docket No. 05-49)........... 3060-AI56
484 Revision of Procedures Governing Amendments to FM Table of Allotments and Changes of 3060-AI63
Community of License in the Radio Broadcast Services (MB Docket No. 05-210)...........
485 Digital Television Distributed Transmission System Technologies (MB Docket No. 05-312) 3060-AI68
486 Implementation of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as Amended by the Cable 3060-AI69
Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992............................
487 Program Access Rules--Sunset of Exclusive Contracts Prohibition & Examination of 3060-AI87
Programming Tying Arrangements; (MB Docket Nos. 07-29, 07-198)........................
488 Third Periodic Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion 3060-AI89
to Digital Television (MB Docket No. 07-91)...........................................
489 DTV Consumer Education Initiative (MB Docket No. 07-148).............................. 3060-AI96
490 Broadcast Localism (MB Docket No. 04-233)............................................. 3060-AJ04
491 Creating a Low Power Radio Service (MM Docket NO. 99-25).............................. 3060-AJ07
492 Sponsorship Identification Rules and Embedded Advertising (MB Docket No. 08-90)....... 3060-AJ10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF MANAGING DIRECTOR--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
493 Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees.......................................... 3060-AI79
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PUBLIC SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY BUREAU--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
494 Revision of the Rules To Ensure Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling 3060-AG34
Systems...............................................................................
495 Enhanced 911 Services for Wireline.................................................... 3060-AG60
496 In the Matter of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act................ 3060-AG74
497 Development of Operational, Technical, and Spectrum Requirements for Public Safety 3060-AG85
Communications Requirements...........................................................
498 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review--Review of Accounts Settlement in Maritime Mobile and 3060-AH30
Maritime Mobile-Satellite Radio Services; (IB Docket No. 98-96).......................
499 Implementation of 911 Act............................................................. 3060-AH90
500 Commission Rules Concerning Disruptions to Communications............................. 3060-AI22
501 E911 Requirements for IP-Enabled Service Providers.................................... 3060-AI62
502 Recommendations of the Independent Panel Reviewing the Impact of Hurricane Katrina on 3060-AI78
Communications Networks...............................................................
503 The Commercial Mobile Alert System.................................................... 3060-AJ03
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
504 Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications................ 3060-AF14
505 Resale and Roaming Obligations Pertaining to Commercial Mobile Radio Services......... 3060-AF58
506 Implementation of the Communications Act, Competitive Bidding; 218-219 MHz Competitive 3060-AG00
Bidding Rules.........................................................................
507 39 GHz Channel Plan................................................................... 3060-AG16
508 Implementation of the Communications Act, Amendment of the Commission's Rules-- 3060-AG21
Broadband PCS Competitive Bidding and the Commercial Mobile Radio Service Spectrum Cap
[[Page 71461]]
509 Multiple Access Systems............................................................... 3060-AG86
510 Amendment of Part I of the Commission's Rules--Competitive Bidding Procedures......... 3060-AG87
511 Amendment of Part 90 of the Rules To Adopt Regulations for Automatic Vehicle 3060-AH12
Monitoring Systems....................................................................
512 Fixed Satellite Service and Terrestrial System in the Ku-Band......................... 3060-AH17
513 Service Rules for the 746-764 and 776-794 MHz Bands, and Revisions to the Commission's 3060-AH32
Rules.................................................................................
514 Implementation of the Communications Act of 1934 as Amended........................... 3060-AH33
515 Amendment of the Rules To License Fixed Services at 24 GHz............................ 3060-AH41
516 Amendment of Governing Maritime Communications........................................ 3060-AH55
517 Competitive Bidding Procedures........................................................ 3060-AH57
518 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review Spectrum Aggregation Limits for Commercial Mobile 3060-AH81
Radio Services........................................................................
519 In the Matter of Promoting Efficient Use of Spectrum Through Elimination of Barriers 3060-AH82
to the Development of Secondary Markets...............................................
520 Reexamination of Roaming Obligations of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Providers..... 3060-AH83
521 Amendment to Licensing Low Power Operations in 450-470 MHz Band....................... 3060-AH84
522 Review of Quiet Zones Application Procedures.......................................... 3060-AH88
523 Reallocation and Service Rules for the 698-746 MHz Spectrum Band (Television Channels 3060-AH89
52-59)................................................................................
524 Year 2000 Biennial Review (WT Docket No. 01-108)...................................... 3060-AI26
525 Air-Ground Telecommunications Services................................................ 3060-AI27
526 Amendments of Various Rules Affecting Wireless Radio Services (WT Docket No. 03-264).. 3060-AI30
527 Facilitating the Provision of Spectrum-Based Services to Rural Areas.................. 3060-AI31
528 Extending Wireless Telecommunications Services to Tribal Lands........................ 3060-AI32
529 Amendment of Commission Rules Concerning Airport Terminal Use Frequencies 450-470 MHz 3060-AI33
Band of the Private Land Mobile Radio Services (WT Docket No. 02-318).................
530 Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band Industrial/Land 3060-AI34
Transportation and Business Channels..................................................
531 Review of Part 87 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Aviation (WT Docket No. 01-289) 3060-AI35
532 Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (WT Docket Nos. 01-309 & 06-150).................... 3060-AI57
533 Implementation of the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act (CSEA) and Modernization of 3060-AI88
the Commission's Competitive Bidding Rules and Procedures (WT Docket No. 05-211)......
534 Facilitating the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access Educational and Other 3060-AJ12
Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands; Reviewing of the Spectrum
Sharing Plan Among Non-Geost..........................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
535 Implementation of the Universal Service Portions of the 1996 Telecommunications Act... 3060-AF85
536 Telecommunications Carriers' Use of Customer Proprietary Network Information and Other 3060-AG43
Customer Information..................................................................
537 Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 3060-AG50
1996..................................................................................
538 Local Telephone Networks That LECs Must Make Available to Competitors................. 3060-AH44
539 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review--Telecommunications Service Quality Reporting 3060-AH72
Requirements..........................................................................
540 Access Charge Reform and Universal Service Reform..................................... 3060-AH74
541 Numbering Resource Optimization....................................................... 3060-AH80
542 National Exchange Carrier Association Petition........................................ 3060-AI47
543 IP-Enabled Services................................................................... 3060-AI48
544 Consumer Protection in the Broadband Era.............................................. 3060-AI73
545 Establishing Just and Reasonable Rates for Local Exchange Carriers (WC Docket No. 07- 3060-AJ02
135)..................................................................................
546 Jurisdictional Separations............................................................ 3060-AJ06
547 Implementation of NET 911 Improvement Act............................................. 3060-AJ09
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 71462]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Long-Term Actions
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
_______________________________________________________________________
442. POLICIES AND RULES GOVERNING INTERSTATE PAY-PER-CALL AND OTHER
INFORMATION SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996 (CC
DOCKET NOS. 96-146, 93-22)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 228
Abstract: The Commission received comments on proposed rules designed
to implement the 1996 Telecommunications Act with respect to
information services to prevent abusive and deceptive practices by
entities that might try to circumvent the statutory requirements. The
proposed rules address generally the use of dialing sequences other
than the 900 service access code to provide information services. The
Commission issued an NPRM on these issues July 16, 2004.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/26/96 61 FR 39107
Order 07/26/96 61 FR 39084
NPRM Comment Period End 09/16/96
Notice to Refresh Record 03/27/03 68 FR 14939
Comment Period End 05/27/03
NPRM 10/15/04 69 FR 61184
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Erica H. McMahon, Chief, Consumer Policy Division,
Federal Communications Commission, Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2512
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG42
_______________________________________________________________________
443. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUBSCRIBER SELECTION CHANGES PROVISION OF THE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996 (CC DOCKET NO. 94-129)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 201; 47 USC 258
Abstract: In December 1998, the Commission established new rules and
policies implementing section 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which makes it unlawful
for any telecommunications carrier to ``submit or execute a change in a
subscriber's selection of a provider of telecommunications exchange
service or telephone toll service except in accordance with such
verification procedures as the Commission shall prescribe.'' The rules
provide, among other things, that any telecommunications carrier that
violates such verification procedures and that collects charges for
telephone exchange service or telephone toll service from a subscriber
shall be liable to the carrier previously selected by the subscriber in
an amount equal to 150 percent of all charges paid by the subscriber
after such violation. In April 2000, the Commission modified the
slamming liability rules by giving victims of slamming adequate
redress, ensuring that carriers that slam do not profit from their
fraud, and allowing States to act as the primary administrator of
slamming complaints. In May 2001, the Commission adopted streamlined
procedures for the carrier-to-carrier sale or transfer of customer
bases.
In February, 2003, the Commission adopted a Reconsideration Order and
Second FNPRM. The Reconsideration Order addresses, amongst other
things, the requirement that a carrier's sales agent drop-off a carrier
change request phone call once the customer has been connected to an
independent third party verifier, and the applicability of our slamming
rules to local exchange carriers. In the Second FNPRM, the Commission
sought comment on rule modifications with respect to third party
verifications.
On January 4, 2008, the Commission released an Order that confirmed
that a LEC that is executing a carrier change on behalf of another
carrier may not re-verify whether the person listed on the change order
is actually authorized to do so.
On January 9, 2008, the Commission released a Fourth Report and Order
that modified the slamming rules regarding the content of independent
third party verifications of a consumer's intent to switch carriers.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
MO&O on Recon and FNPRM 08/14/97 62 FR 43493
FNPRM Comment Period End 09/30/97
Second R&O and Second FNPRM 02/16/99 64 FR 7745
First Order on Recon 04/13/00 65 FR 47678
Third R&O and Second Order on
Recon 11/08/00 65 FR 66934
Third FNPRM 01/29/01 66 FR 8093
Order 03/01/01 66 FR 12877
First R&O and Fourth R&O 06/06/01 66 FR 30334
Second FNPRM 03/17/03 68 FR 19176
Third Order on Recon 03/17/03 68 FR 19152
Second FNPRM Comment Period End 06/17/03
Fourth Order on Recon & First
Order on Recon 07/17/04
Fifth Order on Recon (Release
Date) 11/24/04
Order 02/04/08 73 FR 6444
Fourth R&O 03/12/08 73 FR 13144
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Nancy Stevenson, Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Div.,
Federal Communications Commission, Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2512
TDD Phone: 202 418-7172
Fax: 202 418-1196
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG46
_______________________________________________________________________
444. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996; ACCESS TO
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES EQUIPMENT AND CUSTOMER PREMISE EQUIPMENT FOR
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
Legal Authority: 47 USC 255; 47 USC 251(a)(2)
Abstract: This proceeding is initiated to implement the provisions of
sections 255 and 251(a)(2) of the Communications Act and related
sections of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 regarding the
accessibility of telecommunications equipment and services to persons
with disabilities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Notice 03/07/96 61 FR 9164
Notice 07/30/96 61 FR 39657
R&O 08/14/96 61 FR 42181
NOI 09/26/96 61 FR 50465
Notice 10/23/96 61 FR 54999
NPRM 05/22/98 63 FR 28456
Notice 10/28/98 63 FR 57686
[[Page 71463]]
Notice 04/13/99 64 FR 18021
Notice 04/19/99 64 FR 19178
Notice 06/02/99 64 FR 29644
R&O 11/19/99 64 FR 63235
Further NOI 11/19/99 64 FR 63277
Public Notice 07/13/00 65 FR 43372
Public Notice 01/07/02 67 FR 678
Notice 04/23/02 67 FR 19753
Notice 09/06/02 67 FR 57009
Notice 10/30/02 67 FR 66154
Public Notice 07/21/04 69 FR 43586
Notice 07/29/04 69 FR 45318
Notice 02/14/05 70 FR 7503
Notice 04/06/05 70 FR 17456
Public Notice 07/20/05 70 FR 41754
Notice 03/29/06 71 FR 15738
Notice 07/26/06 71 FR 42396
Public Notice 08/02/06 71 FR 43768
R&O 08/06/07 72 FR 43546
Notice 08/06/07 72 FR 43638
Comment Period End 10/05/07
Notice 12/10/07 72 FR 69686
PRA Comment Period End 02/08/08
Notice 12/11/07 72 FR 70324
Notice 03/06/08 73 FR 12174
Notice/Announcement of Effective
Date 03/20/08 73 FR 14941
PRA Comment Period End 04/07/08
Final Rule: Notice Removal 04/21/08 73 FR 21251
Order 05/15/08 73 FR 28057
Notice 06/13/08 73 FR 33820
Public Notice 08/01/08 73 FR 45008
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Cheryl J. King, Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Office,
Federal Communications Commission, Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2284
TDD Phone: 202 418-0410
Fax: 202 418-6219
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG58
_______________________________________________________________________
445. IN THE MATTER OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICES, THE
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990, AND THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT
OF 1996 (CC DOCKET NO. 90-571)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 225
Abstract: This item addresses the requirement that telecommunications
relay services be capable of handling any type of call normally
provided by common carriers, including coin sent-paid calls.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/04/90 55 FR 50037
R&O and Request for Comments 08/01/91 56 FR 36729
Order on Recon & Second R&O 03/03/93 58 FR 12175
FNPRM 03/30/93 58 FR 12204
MO&O 11/28/95 60 FR 58626
Order 09/08/97 62 FR 47152
Second NPRM 04/05/01 66 FR 18059
Fifth R&O 02/07/03 68 FR 6352
R & O (Correction) 02/24/03 68 FR 8553
Recon of Fifth R&O and Order
Comment Deadline 04/04/03
Public Notice 04/15/03 68 FR 18205
Comment Period End for Petitions
for Recon 04/30/03
Notice 08/27/04 69 FR 52694
Petitions for Recon of Fifth R&O
Denied 09/01/04 69 FR 53346
Notice 09/01/04 69 FR 53442
Comment Period End 11/01/04
Public Notice 11/12/04 69 FR 65401
Comment Period End 11/30/04
Notice 12/27/04 69 FR 77246
Comment Period End 01/26/05
Notice 04/06/05 70 FR 17456
Notice 04/19/06 71 FR 20101
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Thomas Chandler, Federal Communications Commission, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1475
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG75
_______________________________________________________________________
446. TELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICES (TRS) AND SPEECH-TO-SPEECH
SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH HEARING AND SPEECH DISABILITIES, AMERICANS
WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 (ADA)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 225
Abstract: Title IV of the ADA requires the Commission to ensure that
TRS is available to the extent possible in the most efficient manner to
persons with hearing or speech disabilities in the United States. TRS
enables an individual with a hearing or speech disability to
communicate by telephone or other assistive communication device. The
Commission issued its first order pursuant to title IV of the ADA
implementing TRS on July 26, 1991, CC Docket No. 90-571. Since 1991,
the Commission has revisited the regulations governing TRS on numerous
occasions, in part, to make available to consumers new forms of TRS,
and to amend the mandatory minimum standards to improve the quality of
TRS, consistent with the goal of functional equivalency set forth in
section 225. Through these actions the Commission has broadly defined
TRS to include any service that enables persons with hearing or speech
disabilities to use the telecommunications network to communicate by
wire or radio, and not to be limited to either telecommunications
service or services that require a TTY. This docket and RIN flow from
CC Docket No. 90-571 AND RIN 3060-AG75.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/20/98 63 FR 32798
NPRM Comment Period End 09/14/98
FNPRM 06/21/00 65 FR 38490
R&O 06/21/00 65 FR 38432
Public Notice 07/19/01 66 FR 37631
Public Notice Correction 08/03/01 66 FR 40666
Public Notice 08/15/01 66 FR 42858
Public Notice Correction 10/26/01 66 FR 54165
MO&O 01/29/02 67 FR 4203
FNPRM 01/29/02 67 FR 4227
Declaratory Ruling 06/11/02 67 FR 39863
FNPRM 06/11/02 67 FR 39929
Public Notice 07/24/02 67 FR 48415
Public Notice 07/29/02 67 FR 49024
Comment Period End 08/12/02
Public Notice 08/26/02 67 FR 57641
Public Notice 10/31/02 67 FR 66399
Public Notice 10/31/02 67 FR 66400
Public Notice 10/31/02 67 FR 66397
Public Notice 12/17/02 67 FR 77272
Public Notice 01/27/03 68 FR 3880
Fifth R&O 02/07/03 68 FR 6352
Fifth R&O Correction 02/24/03 68 FR 8553
Public Notice 03/04/03 68 FR 10245
Order on Recon 04/06/03 68 FR 18826
Public Notice 05/30/03 68 FR 32511
NPRM 06/23/03 68 FR 37158
Public Notice 08/18/03 68 FR 49478
Public Notice 08/20/03 68 FR 50146
NPRM 08/25/03 68 FR 50993
Second R&O and Order on Recon 08/25/03 68 FR 50973
Public Notice 11/07/03 68 FR 63029
[[Page 71464]]
Waiver & Clarification 04/16/03 68 FR 18826
Notice 04/16/03 68 FR 18828
Comment Period End 04/21/03
Notice 05/29/03 68 FR 32038
Public Notice 07/25/03 68 FR 44082
Public Notice 08/04/03 68 FR 45819
Notice 08/14/03 68 FR 48609
Public Notice 08/18/03 68 FR 49478
Notice 08/25/03 68 FR 51014
Public Notice 09/29/03 68 FR 55955
Declaratory Ruling 09/29/03 68 FR 55898
Notice 10/27/03 68 FR 61217
Comment Period End 10/30/03
Notice 11/30/03 68 FR 62249
Public Notice 12/01/03 68 FR 67166
Notice 12/24/03 68 FR 74504
Public Notice 12/31/03 68 FR 75559
Notice 02/24/04 69 FR 8331
Notice 03/26/04 69 FR 15730
Public Notice 07/26/04 69 FR 44534
Notice 07/28/04 69 FR 44970
Comment Period End 08/30/04
R&O and Order on Recon 09/01/04 69 FR 53346
FNPRM 09/01/04 69 FR 53382
Notice 09/01/04 69 FR 53442
Correction 09/17/04 69 FR 55985
Comment Period End re: 69 FR
53442 11/01/04
Comment Period End re: 69 FR
53382 11/15/04
Correction 09/24/04 69 FR 57231
Public Notice 11/15/04 69 FR 64573
Comment Period End 11/30/04
Notice 12/27/04 69 FR 77246
Public Notice 01/11/05 70 FR 1894
Comment Period End 01/19/05
Public Notice 01/13/05 70 FR 2360
Public Notice 02/17/05 70 FR 8034
Declaratory Ruling/
Interpretation 02/25/05 70 FR 9239
Public Notice 03/07/05 70 FR 10930
Comment Period End 03/04/05
Public Notice 03/16/05 70 FR 12884
Comment Period End 05/02/05
Order 03/23/05 70 FR 14568
Order on Recon 04/06/05 70 FR 17330
Public Notice/ Announcement of
Date 04/06/05 70 FR 17334
Notice 04/06/05 70 FR 17456
Public Notice 05/11/05 70 FR 24790
Comment Period End 05/25/05
Order 07/01/05 70 FR 38134
Order on Recon 08/31/05 70 FR 51643
R&O 08/31/05 70 FR 51649
Order/Clarification 09/14/05 70 FR 54294
Notice 09/14/05 70 FR 54381
Notice 01/11/06 71 FR 1753
Comment Period End 02/10/06
Notice 03/24/06 71 FR 14893
Notice 04/19/06 71 FR 20101
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Thomas Chandler, Federal Communications Commission, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1475
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG76
_______________________________________________________________________
447. RULES AND REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER
PROTECTION ACT (TCPA) OF 1991 (CG DOCKET NO. 02-278) (SECTION 610
REVIEW)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 227
Abstract: The Commission released an NPRM on September 18, 2002,
seeking comment on the rules implementing the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA). The NPRM sought comment on whether the
Commission should revise its existing rules, or adopt additional rules,
on the use of autodialers, prerecorded messages, and unsolicited
facsimile advertisements. The NPRM also sought comment on the
effectiveness of the company-specific do-not-call lists and whether to
revisit the option of establishing a national do-not-call list.
On July 3, 2003, the Commission released a Report and Order
establishing, along with the FTC, a national do-not-call registry. The
Commission's Report and Order also adopted rules on the use of
predictive dialers, the transmission of caller ID information by
telemarketers, and the sending of unsolicited fax advertisements.
On September 21, 2004, the Commission released an Order adopting a
limited safe harbor period from the prohibition on placing automatic
telephone dialing systems or prerecorded message calls to wireless
numbers when such calls are made to numbers that have been recently
ported from wireline service to wireless service. In addition, the
Commission amended its existing safe harbor rules for telemarketers
subject to the do-not-call registry to require such telemarketers to
access the do-not-call list every 31 days, rather than every three
months.
On December 9, 2005 the Commission released an NPRM proposing to amend
the fax advertising rules to implement the Junk Fax Protection Act of
2005. On April 5, 2006, the Commission adopted a Report and Order and
Third Order on Reconsideration amending its facsimile advertising
rules.
On January 4, 2008, the Commission released a Declaratory Ruling to
address the ACA International petition, clarifying that autodialed and
prerecorded message calls to wireless numbers that are provided by the
called party to a creditor in connection with an existing debt are
permissible as calls made with the ``prior express consent'' of the
called party.
Following a December 4, 2007 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, on June 17,
2008, the Commission releases a Report and Order amending its rules to
require sellers and/or telemarketers to honor registrations with the
National Do-Not-Call Registry indefinitely, unless the registration is
cancelled by the consumer or the number is removed by the database
administrator.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/08/02 67 FR 62667
NPRM Comment Period Extended 11/29/02 67 FR 71126
Reply Comment Period Extended 12/26/02 67 FR 78763
Comment Period End 01/31/03
FNPRM 04/03/03 68 FR 16250
Order 07/25/03 68 FR 44144
Order Effective 08/25/03
Order on Recon 08/25/03 68 FR 50978
Order 10/14/03 68 FR 59130
FNPRM 03/31/04 69 FR 16873
Order 10/08/04 69 FR 60311
Order 10/28/04 69 FR 62816
Order on Recon 04/13/05 70 FR 19330
Order 06/30/05 70 FR 37705
NPRM 12/19/05 70 FR 75102
Notice 04/26/06 71 FR 24634
Order 05/03/06 71 FR 25967
NPRM 12/14/07 72 FR 71099
Order 02/01/08 73 FR 6041
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Erica H. McMahon, Chief, Consumer Policy Division,
Federal Communications Commission, Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2512
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI14
[[Page 71465]]
_______________________________________________________________________
448. RULES AND REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING SECTION 225 OF THE
COMMUNICATIONS ACT (TELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE) (CG DOCKET NO. 03-
123) (SECTION 610 REVIEW)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 225; 47 USC 255; 47 USC
610
Abstract: This proceeding established a new docket flowing from the
previous telecommunications relay service (TRS) history, CC Docket No.
98-67. This proceeding continues the Commission's inquiry into
improving the quality of TRS and furthering the goal of functional
equivalency consistent with the Congress' mandate that TRS regulations
encourage the use of existing technology and not discourage or impair
the development of new technology. In this docket, the Commission
explores ways to improve emergency preparedness for TRS facilities and
services, new TRS technologies, public access to information and
outreach, and issues related to payments from the Interstate TRS Fund.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/25/03 68 FR 50993
NPRM Comment Period End 10/09/03
Public Notice 07/26/04 69 FR 44534
Comment Period End 08/30/04
R&O, Order on Recon 09/01/04 69 FR 53346
FNPRM 09/01/04 69 FR 53382
Public Notice 11/12/04 69 FR 65401
FNPRM Comment Period End 11/15/04
Comment Period End 11/30/04
Comment Period End 12/30/04
Public Notice 01/11/05 70 FR 2360
Comment Period End 01/19/05
Public Notice 02/17/05 70 FR 8034
Declaratory Ruling/
Interpretation 02/25/05 70 FR 9239
Comment Period End 03/04/05
Public Notice 03/07/05 70 FR 10930
Public Notice 03/16/05 70 FR 12884
Order 03/23/05 70 FR 14568
Public Notice/ Announcement of
Date 04/06/05 70 FR 17334
Comment Period End 05/02/05
Public Notice 05/11/05 70 FR 24790
Comment Period End 05/25/05
Order 07/01/05 70 FR 38134
Deadline 07/01/05
Public Notice 07/13/05 70 FR 38134
Order on Recon 08/31/05 70 FR 51643
R&O 08/31/05 70 FR 51649
Public Notice 09/07/05 70 FR 53191
Order on Clarification 09/14/05 70 FR 54294
Notice 09/14/05 70 FR 54381
Order on Clarification 09/14/05 70 FR 54298
Comment Period End 10/07/05
Public Notice 10/12/05 70 FR 59346
Public Notice 11/30/05 70 FR 71849
R&O/Order on Recon 12/23/05 70 FR 76208
Order 12/28/05 70 FR 76712
Order 12/29/05 70 FR 77052
Notice 01/11/06 71 FR 1753
Notice 01/11/06 71 FR 1755
Comment Period End 01/17/06
Public Notice/Petition for
Rulemaking Withdrawn 01/18/06 71 FR 2942
NPRM 02/01/06 71 FR 5221
Notice 02/01/06 71 FR 5221
Comment Period End 02/10/06
Comment Period End 03/08/06
Notice/Announcement of Effective
Date 03/15/06 71 FR 13281
Notice 03/24/06 71 FR 14893
Public Notice 05/10/06 71 FR 27252
Notice 05/24/06 71 FR 29961
Declaratory Ruling/Clarification05/31/06 71 FR 30818
FNPRM 05/31/06 71 FR 30848
Declaratory Ruling/Dismissal of
Petition 06/21/06 71 FR 35553
Clarification 06/28/06 71 FR 36690
Public Notice 06/28/06 71 FR 36795
Public Notice 06/28/06 71 FR 36796
Public Notice 06/28/06 71 FR 36794
Declaratory Ruling on Recon 07/06/06 71 FR 38268
Comment Period End 07/17/06
Comment Period End 07/17/06
Public Notice 08/02/06 71 FR 43768
Order on Recon 08/16/06 71 FR 47141
MO&O 08/16/06 71 FR 47145
Clarification 08/23/06 71 FR 49380
FNPRM 09/13/06 71 FR 54009
Correction 09/27/06 71 FR 56442
FNPRM Comment Period End 10/30/06
FNPRM Comment Period End 11/13/06
PRA Comment Period End 11/13/06
Final Rule; Clarification 02/14/07 72 FR 6960
Notice 02/14/07 72 FR 7031
Notice Comment Period End 04/16/07
Public Notice 03/01/07 72 FR 9333
Notice 03/01/07 72 FR 9332
Public Notice 03/07/07 72 FR 10214
Order 03/14/07 72 FR 11789
Public Notice 04/12/07 72 FR 18478
Notice 04/18/07 72 FR 19501
Notice 05/02/07 72 FR 24305
Public Notice 05/16/07 72 FR 27570
Public Notice 05/16/07 72 FR 27569
Notice 06/06/07 72 FR 31327
Notice 06/13/07 72 FR 32661
Public Notice 07/18/07 72 FR 39423
R&O 08/06/07 72 FR 43546
Notice 08/06/07 72 FR 43638
Public Notice 08/16/07 72 FR 46060
Order 11/01/07 72 FR 61813
Public Notice 11/01/07 72 FR 61882
Notice 12/11/07 72 FR 70324
Public Notice 01/04/08 73 FR 863
R&O/Declaratory Ruling 01/17/08 73 FR 3197
Notice 01/17/08 73 FR 3253
Order 02/19/08 73 FR 9031
Public Notice 02/19/08 73 FR 9118
Public Notice 03/27/08 73 FR 16304
Public Notice 04/07/08 73 FR 18796
Comment Period End 05/22/08
R&O 04/21/08 73 FR 21252
Order 04/21/08 73 FR 21347
Order 04/23/08 73 FR 21843
Public Notice 04/30/08 73 FR 23361
Order 05/15/08 73 FR 28057
Public Notice 05/23/08 73 FR 26992
Notice 06/16/08 73 FR 34015
PRA Comment Period End 07/16/08
Declaratory Ruling 07/08/08 73 FR 38928
R&O 07/18/08 73 FR 41286
FNPRM 07/18/08 73 FR 41307
Comment Period End 08/25/08
PRA Comment Period End 09/16/08
Notice 07/18/08 73 FR 41351
PRA Comment Period End 09/16/08
Notice/Announcement of Effective
Date 07/30/08 73 FR 4417
Public Notice 08/01/08 73 FR 45006
Comment Period End 09/29/08
Public Notice 08/22/08 73 FR 49670
Public Notice 08/22/08 73 FR 49670
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Thomas Chandler, Federal Communications Commission, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1475
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI15
_______________________________________________________________________
449. RULES AND REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE CONTROLLING THE ASSAULT OF
NON-SOLICITED PORNOGRAPHY AND MARKETING ACT OF 2003 (CG DOCKET NO. 04-
53)
Legal Authority: 15 USC 7706; 15 USC 7712; PL 108-187
[[Page 71466]]
Abstract: The Commission has adopted rules to protect consumers from
unwanted electronic mobile service messages to implement the
Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act
of 2003.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/31/04 69 FR 16873
NPRM Comment Period End 05/17/04
Order 09/16/04 69 FR 55765
Order Cross Referencing Federal
Trade Commission Definitions 03/25/05 70 FR 34665
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Julie Saulnier, Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Div.,
Federal Communications Commission, Consumer and Government Affairs
Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1598
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI20
_______________________________________________________________________
450. RULES AND REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING MINIMUM CUSTOMER ACCOUNT RECORD
EXCHANGE (CARE) OBLIGATIONS ON ALL LOCAL AND INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS (CG
DOCKET NO. 02-386)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 201 and 202; 47 USC
303(r)
Abstract: On December 20, 2002, the Commission issued a Public Notice
directing interested parties to file comments on issues raised in a
petition filed with the Commission by Americatel Corporation and on a
separate petition filed by AT&T, Sprint, and MCI. The petitions asked
the Commission to address problems relating to the exchange of customer
account records between local and long distance telephone service
providers. On March 25, 2004, the Commission released a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in CG Docket No. 02-386 seeking further comment on
the two petitions and seeking comment as to whether to replace the
current voluntary industry process for the exchange of customer account
information between local and long distance service providers with
mandatory, minimum standards applicable to all such providers.
On February 25, 2005, the Commission released a Report and Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CG Docket No. 02-386. The
Report and Order adopted final rules governing the exchange of customer
account information between local and long distance telephone service
providers. The Commission adopted these rules to help to ensure that
consumers' phone service bills are accurate and that their carrier
selection requests are honored and executed without undue delay. In the
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission sought comment on
the need for rules governing the exchange of customer account
information between local telephone service providers. On April 15,
2005, and June 15, 2005, a coalition of local and long distance
carriers proposed minor modifications and clarifications to section
64.4002 of the Commission's CARE rules. On August 29, 2005, the
Commission released a public notice requesting comment on the
coalition's proposed clarifications and modifications. Notice of the
proposed changes was published in the Federal Register on September 7,
2005 (70 FR 53137). The comment cycle established by the August 29
public notice closed October 3, 2005.
On September 13, 2006, the Commission released an Order on
Reconsideration adopting the clarifications and technical corrections
to the Report and Order, as proposed by the coalition of carriers.
On December 21, 2007, the Commission released a Report and Order
declining to adopt mandatory data exchange requirements between local
exchange carriers.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/19/04 69 FR 20845
NPRM Comment Period End 06/18/04
R&O and FNPRM (Release Date) 02/25/05
FNPRM Comment Period End 08/01/05
Public Notice 08/29/05 70 FR 53137--01
Public Notice Comment Period End10/03/05
Order on Recon 12/13/06 71 FR 74819
R&O 01/08/08 73 FR 1297
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Lisa Boehley, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7395
Fax: 202 418-0236
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI58
_______________________________________________________________________
451. TRUTH IN BILLING AND BILLING FORMAT
Legal Authority: 47 USC 201; 47 USC 258
Abstract: In 1999, the Commission adopted truth-in-billing rules to
address concerns that there is consumer confusion relating to billing
for telecommunications services. On March 18, 2005, the Commission
released an Order and FNPRM to further facilitate the ability of
telephone consumers to make informed choices among competitive service
offerings.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
FNPRM 05/25/05 70 FR 30044
Order 05/25/05 70 FR 29979
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Richard D. Smith, Special Counsel, Federal
Communications Commission, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau,
445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 717 338-2797
Fax: 717 338-2574
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI61
_______________________________________________________________________
452. CLOSED CAPTIONING OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING
Legal Authority: 47 USC 613
Abstract: This proceeding is initiated to seek comment on rules the FCC
adopted in 1997 regarding closed captioning and whether changes are
needed to make the rules more effective in making video programming
more accessible to deaf and hard of hearing Americans.
[[Page 71467]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
R&O 09/16/97 62 CFR 48487
Notice 10/02/97 62 FR 54848
Order on Recon 10/28/98 63 FR 55959
Notice 09/29/00 65 FR 58552
Notice 01/05/01 66 FR 1136
Notice 12/31/03 68 FR 75558
Notice 05/11/04 69 FR 26095
NPRM 09/26/05 70 FR 56150
Comment Period Extended 11/25/05 70 FR 71077
Comment Period End 12/16/05
Notice 09/27/07 72 FR 70324
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Amelia L. Brown, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2799
TDD Phone: 202 418-7804
Fax: 202 418-6947
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI72
_______________________________________________________________________
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Long-Term Actions
Office of Engineering and Technology
_______________________________________________________________________
453. REVISION OF THE RULES REGARDING ULTRA-WIDEBAND TRANSMISSION
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 302 to 304; 47 USC 307; 47 USC 544A
Abstract: The First Report and Order amends the Commission's rules to
permit the marketing and operation of certain types of new products
incorporating Ultra-Wideband (UWB) technology. UWB devices operate by
employing very narrow or short duration pulses that result in very
large or wideband transmission bandwidths. UWB technology holds great
promise for a vast array of new applications that we believe will
provide significant benefits for public safety, businesses and
consumers. With appropriate technical standards, UWB devices can
operate using spectrum occupied by existing radio services without
causing interference, thereby permitting scarce spectrum resources to
be used more efficiently.
The Memorandum Opinion and Order responded to fourteen petitions for
reconsideration that were filed in response to the regulations for
unlicensed ultra-wideband (UWB) operations. In general, this document
does not make any significant changes to the existing UWB parameters as
the Commission is reluctant to do so until it has more experience with
UWB devices. The Commission believes that any major changes to the
rules for existing UWB product categories at this early stage would be
disruptive to current industry product development efforts.
The Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making proposed new rules to
address issues raised by some of the petitions for reconsideration that
were outside the scope of the proceeding. New rules were proposed to
address issues regarding the operation of low pulse repetition
frequency UWB systems, including vehicular radars, in the 3.1-10.6 GHz
band; and the operation frequency hopping vehicular radars in the 22-29
GHz band as UWB devices. The Commission also proposed new rules that
would establish new peak power limits for wideband part 15 devices that
do no operate as UWB devices and proposed to eliminate the definition
of a UWB device.
The Second Report and Order and Second Memorandum Opinion and Order
responds to two petitions for reconsideration that were filed in
response to the Commission's decision to establish regulations for
unlicensed UWB operation. It also responds to the rule making proposals
contained in the Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of
Proposed Rule Making in this docket. The order establishes new rules
for wideband unlicensed devices operating in the 5925-7250 MHz, 16.2-
17.7 GHz, and 22.12-29 GHz bands.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/14/00 65 FR 37332
NPRM Comment Period End 10/12/00
First R&O 05/16/02 67 FR 34852
MO&O 04/22/03 68 FR 19746
FNPRM 04/22/03 68 FR 19773
Second R&O and Second MO&O 02/09/05 70 FR 6771
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: John Reed, Electronics Engineer, Federal Communications
Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2455
Fax: 202 418-1944
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH47
_______________________________________________________________________
454. NEW ADVANCED WIRELESS SERVICES (ET DOCKET NO. 00-258)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 157(a); 47 USC 303(c); 47 USC
303(f); 47 USC 303(g); 47 USC 303(r)
Abstract: This proceeding explores the possible uses of frequency bands
below 3 GHz to support the introduction of new advanced wireless
services, including third generations as well as future generations of
wireless systems. Advanced wireless systems could provide for a wide
range of voice data and broadband services over a variety of mobile and
fixed networks.
The Third Notice of Proposed Rule Making discusses the frequency bands
that are still under consideration in this proceeding and invites
additional comments on their disposition. Specifically, it addresses
the Unlicensed Personal Communications Service (UPCS) band at 1910-1930
MHz, the Multipoint Distribution Service (MDS) spectrum at 2155-2160/62
MHz bands, the Emerging Technology spectrum, at 2160-2165 MHz, and the
bands reallocated from MSS 91990-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz and 2165-2180
MHz. We seek comment on these bands with respect to using them for
paired or unpaired Advance Wireless Service (AWS) operations or as
relocation spectrum for existing services.
The 7th Report & Order facilitates the introduction of Advanced
Wireless Service (AWS) in the band 1710-1755 MHz--an integral part of a
90 MHz spectrum allocation recently reallocated to allow for such new
and innovative wireless services. We largely adopt the
[[Page 71468]]
proposals set forth in our recent AWS Fourth NPRM in this proceeding
that are designed to clear the 1710-1755 MHz band of incumbent Federal
Government operations that would otherwise impede the development of
new nationwide AWS services. These actions are consistent with previous
actions in this proceeding and with the United States Department of
Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration
(NTIA) 2002 Viability Assessment, which addressed relocation and
reaccommodation options for Federal Government operations in the band.
The 8th Report and Order reallocated the 2155-2160 MHz band for Fixed
and Mobile services and designates the 2155-2175 MHz band for Advanced
Wireless Service (AWS) use. This proceeding continues the Commission's
ongoing efforts to promote spectrum utilization and efficiency with
regard to the provision of new services, including Advanced Wireless
Services.
The Order requires Broadband Radio Service (BRS) licensees in the 2150-
2160/62 MHz band to provide information on the construction status and
operational parameters of each incumbent BRS system that would be the
subject of relocation.
The Notice of Proposed Rule Making requested comments on the specific
relocation procedures applicable to Broadband Radio Service (BRS)
operations in the 2150-2160/62 MHz band, which the Commission recently
decided will be relocated to the newly restructured 2495-2690 MHz band.
The Commission also requested comments on the specific relocation
procedures applicable to Fixed Microwave Service (FS) operations in the
2160-2175 MHz band.
The Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) and the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) set forth the specific data that
Broadband Radio Service (BRS) licensees in the 2150-2160/62 MHz band
must file along with the deadline date and procedures for filing this
data on the Commission's Universal Licensing System (ULS). The data
will assist in determining future AWS licensee's relocation
obligations.
The 9th Report and Order established procedures for the relocation of
Broadband Radio Service (BRS) operations from the 2150-2160/62 MHz
band, as well as for the relocation of Fixed Microwave Service (FS)
operations from the 2160-2175 MHz band, and modified existing
relocation procedures for the 2110-2150 MHz and 2175-2180 MHz bands. It
also established cost-sharing rules to identify the reimbursement
obligations for Advanced Wireless Service (AWS) and Mobile Satellite
Service (MSS) entrants benefiting from the relocation of incumbent FS
operations in the 2110-2150 MHz and 2160-2200 MHz bands and AWS
entrants benefiting from the relocation of BRS incumbents in the 2150-
2160/62 MHz band. The Commission continues its ongoing efforts to
promote spectrum utilization and efficiency with regard to the
provision of new services, including AWS. The Order dismisses a
petition for reconsideration filed by the Wireless Communications
Association International, Inc. (WCA) as moot.
Two petitions for Reconsideration were filed in response to the 9th
Report and Order.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/23/01 66 FR 7438
NPRM Comment Period End 03/09/01
Final Report 04/11/01 66 FR 18740
FNPRM 09/13/01 66 FR 47618
MO&O 09/13/01 66 FR 47591
First R&O 10/25/01 66 FR 53973
Petition for Recon 11/02/01 66 FR 55666
Second R&O 01/24/03 68 FR 3455
Third NPRM 03/13/03 68 FR 12015
Seventh R&O 12/29/04 69 FR 7793
Petition for Recon 04/13/05 70 FR 19469
Eighth R&O 10/26/05 70 FR 61742
Order 10/26/05 70 FR 61742
NPRM 10/26/05 70 FR 61752
Public Notice 12/14/05 70 FR 74011
Ninth R&O and Order 05/24/06 71 FR 29818
Petition for Recon 07/19/06 71 FR 41022
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Rodney Small, Economist, Federal Communications
Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2452
Fax: 202 418-1944
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH65
_______________________________________________________________________
455. TRANSFER OF THE 3650 THROUGH 3700 MHZ BAND FROM FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
USE (WT DOCKET NO. 05-96; ET DOCKET NO. 02-380)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 157; 47 USC 303; 47 USC 307; 47 USC
332
Abstract: This proceeding seeks to determine whether the 3650 to 3700
MHz band should be used for unlicensed devices or some or all of the
band should be used for unlicensed options.
In January 1999, the 3650-3700 MHz band (3650 MHz band) was transferred
from Government/non-Government shared use to a mixed-use band. In
October 2000, in ET Docket No. 98-237, the FCC allocated the band to
fixed and mobile terrestrial services on a co-primary basis, but in
order to protect grandfathered Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) earth
stations and Federal Government radiolocation operations, limited the
mobile allocation to base stations use only. At this same time, the FCC
proposed licensing and service rules for fixed and mobile operations in
the band. Subsequently, in December 2002, in ET Docket No. 02-380, the
FCC sought comment, in part, on the possibility of allowing unlicensed
devices to operate in the 3650 MHz band. In April 2004, in ET Docket
No. 04-151, the FCC followed-up on this inquiry by releasing a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking comment on whether the 3650 MHz
band should be used for unlicensed devices or part or all of the band
should be used for licensed operations.
The NPRM proposes to allow unlicensed devices to operate in all, or
part, of the 3650 MHz band at higher power levels than usually
permitted for unlicensed services. These devices would be subject to
smart (or cognitive) requirements and other safeguards designed to
prevent interference to the licensed FSS earth stations now resident in
the band. As with other unlicensed devices, these devices would not be
permitted to cause interference to licensed services, such as the FSS
earth stations, and would have to accept interference. The NPRM also
seeks comment on other options for the band, including licensed use of
the band by fixed and mobile services, or segmenting the 3650 MHz band
to provide for a combination of unlicensed and licensed terrestrial
[[Page 71469]]
services. The Notice seeks comment on issues related both to allocation
changes necessary to set the relative priority between terrestrial and
FSS licensed operations, and to licensing rule changes necessary to
implement licensed terrestrial service operations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/16/00 65 FR 14230
First R&O and Second NPRM 11/17/00 65 FR 69612
Petition for Recon 03/28/01 66 FR 16940
R&O 02/27/02 67 FR 17038
MO&O and Third R&O 05/02/03 68 FR 38635
Notice of Inquiry 01/21/03 68 FR 2730
NPRM 05/14/04 69 FR 26790
Final Rule 05/11/05 70 FR 24712
Final Rule 07/20/05 70 FR 41631
MO&O 07/25/07 72 FR 40767
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jeffrey Dygert, Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7300
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH75
_______________________________________________________________________
456. EXPOSURE TO RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 302 and 303; 47 USC 309(j); 47 USC
336
Abstract: The notice of proposed rulemaking proposed amendments to the
FCC rules relating to compliance of transmitters and facilities with
guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) energy.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/08/03 68 FR 52879
NPRM Comment Period End 12/08/03
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Ira Keltz, Electronics Engineer, Federal Communications
Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0616
Fax: 202 418-1944
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI17
_______________________________________________________________________
457. UNLICENSED OPERATION OF THE 3650-3700 BAND (ET DOCKET NO. 04-151)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154
Abstract: The notice of proposed rulemaking proposed to maximize the
efficient use of the 3650-3700 MHz band. The proposal would allow
unlicensed devices to operate in either all, or portions of, this
radiofrequency (RF) band under flexible technical limitations with
smart/cognitive features that should prevent interference to licensed
satellite services. The proposal fostered the introduction of new and
advanced services to the American public, especially in rural areas.
The Report and Order adopted rules that provide for nationwide, non-
exclusive, licensing of terrestrial operations, utilizing technology
with a contention-base protocol, in the 3650-3700 MHz band. The
Commission also adopted a streamlined licensing mechanism with minimal
regulatory entry requirements that will encourage multiple entrants and
stimulate the rapid expansion of wireless broadband services---
especially in rural American and will also serve as a safeguard to
protect incumbent satellite earth stations from harmful interference.
In the Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Commission addressed several
petitions for reconsideration and an emergency motion for stay that
were filed in response 3650 MHz Allocation Order in ET Docket No. 98-
237.
In light of its full review of the refreshed record in this proceeding,
and in light of the decisions made in the companion Report and Order,
the Commission denied the aspects of the petitions that challenge and
seek to reverse the allocation decisions made in the 3650 MHz
Allocation Order.
The Commission denied the motion for stay. When the Commission
established the November 30, 2000, filing deadline, it did so because
it found that additional new FSS facilities permitted by the Freeze
Memorandum Opinion and Order could affect the use of the 3650-3700 MHz
band by the terrestrial services. By deciding in this Order to maintain
the FSS allocation changes made in the 3650 MHz Allocation Order, the
Commission, reaffirmed its conclusion that allowing additional primary
FSS earth stations in the 3650 MHz band could negatively affect the
prospects for viable FS/MS terrestrial operations.
The Memorandum Opinion and Order addressed petitions for
reconsideration filed in response to the Commission's Report and Order
relating to the 3650-3700 MHz band (3650 MHz band) proceeding. The
Commission affirmed its previous decisions to create a spectrum
environment that will encourage multiple entrants and stimulate the
expansion of broadband service to rural and under served areas. To
facilitate rapid deployment in the band, the Commission maintains the
previously adopted, non-exclusive licensing scheme. The clarification
and modification will facilitate operation of the widest variety of
broadband technologies with minimal risk of interference in both the
near and long terms. They should further reduce the potential for co-
channel interference, provide additional protections to the multiple
users in the band under the current licensing regime, and create
incentives for the rapid development of broadly compatible contention
technologies.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/14/04 69 FR 26790
R&O & MO&O 05/11/05 70 FR 24712
MO&O 07/25/07 72 FR 40767
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jeffrey Dygert, Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7300
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI50
_______________________________________________________________________
458. UNLICENSED OPERATION IN THE TV BROADCAST BANDS (ET DOCKET NO. 04-
186)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 302; 47 USC 303(e) and 303(f);
47 USC 303(r); 47 USC 307
Abstract: The notice of proposed rulemaking proposes to amend the
Commission's rules to allow unlicensed radio transmitters to operate in
the
[[Page 71470]]
broadcast television spectrum at locations where that spectrum is not
being used. We believe that the proposals set forth will provide for
more efficient and effective use of the TV spectrum and will have
significant benefits for the public by allowing the development of new
and innovative types of unlicensed broadband devices and services for
businesses and consumers.
In the First Report and Order, the Commission took a number of steps
towards allowing the introduction of new low power devices in the
broadcast television spectrum (TV bands) on channels/frequencies that
are not being used for authorized services (hereinafter referred to as
``TV band devices''). The goal in this proceeding is to allow such
devices to operate on unused television channels in locations where
such operations will not result in harmful interference to TV and other
authorized services. The Commission believes that this plan will
provide for more efficient and effective use of the TV spectrum and
will significantly benefit the public by allowing the development of
new and innovative types of devices and services for businesses and
consumers, without disrupting television and other authorized services
using the TV bands. Because transmissions in the TV band are subject to
less propagation attenuation than transmissions in other bands where
lower power operations are permitted (such as unlicensed operations in
the 2.4 GHz band), operations in the TV bands can benefit a wide range
of service providers and consumers by improving the service range of
wireless operations, thereby allowing operators to reach new customers.
While there will be significant benefits to the public from its
actions, the Commission recognizes that it must balance these benefits
with the need to protect authorized services in the TV bands from
harmful interference.
The Further NPRM proposed to allow low power transmitters to operate in
the TV broadcast bands at locations where spectrum is not being used by
authorized services without causing harmful interference to these
services. The Further NPRM seeks comment on whether these TV band
devices should be authorized on a licensed, unlicensed or hybrid basis.
It would propose to require TV band devices to incorporate ``smart
radio'' features to detect vacant TV channels and prevent harmful
interference from TV band devices to authorized services operating in
the TV bands. These features would include the abilities to 1) monitor
spectrum prior to transmitting to ensure that it is not in use by
authorized services, 2) switch frequencies or cease transmitting if an
authorized service begins using a previously unused frequency, 3)
adjust transmit power to the minimum needed to establish a link, 4)
determine geographic location and access a database to determine which
channels are in use, and/or 5) receive a control signal and select the
operating frequency based on data in the control signal.
These proposals, if adopted, will prove beneficial to manufacturers and
users of low power transmitters because they will provide for more
efficient and effective use of the TV spectrum and allow the
development of new and innovative types of wireless devices and
communication services for businesses and consumers.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/18/04 69 FR 34103
First R&O 11/17/06 71 FR 66876
FNPRM 11/17/06 71 FR 66897
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Hugh Van Tuyl, Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7506
Fax: 202 418-1944
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI52
_______________________________________________________________________
459. UNLICENSED DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT APPROVAL (ET DOCKET NO. 03-201)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 302(a); 47 USC 303; 47 USC 306
Abstract: The notice of proposed rulemaking proposed to update section
15.247 of the rules to allow the use of more efficient antenna
technologies with unlicensed devices.
The Report and Order updates several technical rules for unlicensed
radiofrequency devices in part 15 of the Commission's rules. The rule
changes will allow device manufacturers to develop expanded
applications for unlicensed devices and will allow unlicensed device
operators, including Wireless Internet Service providers greater
flexibility to modify or substitute parts as long as the overall system
operation is unchanged. The changes are part of an ongoing process of
updating our rules to promote more efficient sharing of spectrum used
by unlicensed devices and remove unnecessary regulations that inhibit
such sharing. The Commission received one petition for reconsideration
in this proceeding.
The Second Report and Order amended the Commission's rules to provide
for more efficient equipment authorization of both existing modular
transmitter devices and emerging partitioned (or ``split'') modular
transmitter devices. These rule changes will benefit manufacturers by
allowing greater flexibility in certifying equipment and providing
relief from the need to obtain a new equipment authorization each time
the same transmitter is installed in a different final product. The
rule changes will also enable manufacturers to develop more flexible
and more advanced unlicensed transmitter technologies. The Commission
further found that modular transmitter devices authorized in accordance
with the revised equipment authorization procedures will not pose any
increased risk of interference to other radio operations.
The Further NPRM, seeks comment on whether there is a need to require
unlicensed transmitters operating in the 915 MHz band under sections
15.247 and 15.249 of the rules to comply with a spectrum etiquette
requirement, and the impact that requiring an etiquette would have on
the development and operation of unlicensed 915 MHz devices operating
under those rule sections. The Commission also seeks comment on the
particular etiquette suggested by Cellnet that would require digitally
modulated spread spectrum transmitters operating in the 915 MHz band
under section 15.247 of the rules to operate at less than the 1-watt
maximum power if they are continuously silent less than 90 percent of
the time within a 0.4 second interval. This etiquette would require
that the maximum permitted power level decrease in accordance with a
specified formula as the silent interval between transmission
decreases. The Commission further seeks comment on
[[Page 71471]]
alternatives to the etiquette suggested by Cellnet.
The Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissed two petitions for
reconsideration of the rules adopted in the Report and Order, 69 FR
54027, September 7, 2004, in this proceeding. It dismissed a petition
for reconsideration filed by Warren C. Havens and Telesaurus Holdings
GB LLC (Havens) requesting that the Commission suspend the rule changes
adopted for unlicensed devices in the 902-928 MHz (915 MHz) band until
such time as it completes a formal inquiry with regard to the potential
effect of such changes to Location and Monitoring Service (LMS)
licensees in the band. The Commission also dismissed a petition for
reconsideration filed by Cellnet Technology (Cellnet) requesting that
the Commission adopt spectrum sharing requirements in the unlicensed
bands, e.g., a ``spectrum etiquette,'' particularly in the 915 MHz
band.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/17/03 68 FR 68823
R&O 09/07/04 69 FR 54027
Petition for Recon 11/19/04 69 FR 67736
Petition for Recon 02/15/05 70 FR 7737
Second R&O 05/23/07 72 FR 28889
FNPRM 08/01/07 72 FR 42011
MO&O 08/01/07 72 FR 41937
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Hugh Van Tuyl, Electronics Engineer, Federal
Communications Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7506
Fax: 202 418-1944
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI54
_______________________________________________________________________
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Long-Term Actions
International Bureau
_______________________________________________________________________
460. STREAMLINING THE COMMISSION'S RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR SATELLITE
APPLICATION AND LICENSING PROCEDURES (IB DOCKET NO. 95-117)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 4; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 303; 47 USC 554; 47 USC
701 to 744
Abstract: On February 10, 1997, the FCC adopted rules and policies that
streamlined the application and licensing requirements of part 25 of
its rules, which deals with communication satellites and earth
stations. The streamlined rules waived the construction permit
requirement for satellite space stations; changed the license term for
temporary fixed earth stations; and adjusted or changed the rules
concerning minor modifications and basic requirements for satellite
service applications. The streamlined rules also resulted in the
creation of a new application form, FCC Form 312. Form 312 eliminated
from the International Bureau's use of the FCC Form 493, FCC Form 430,
FCC Form 702, and FCC Form 704. Petitions for Reconsideration were
filed in this matter. In March 1997 the Commission released a Public
Notice concerning these petitions, which are presently pending before
the International Bureau.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/09/95 60 FR 46252
R&O, Recon Pending 02/10/97 62 FR 5924
Public Notice/Petitions for
Recon 03/26/97 62 FR 14430
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Steven Spaeth, Assistant Division Chief, Federal
Communications Commission, International Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1539
Fax: 202 418-0748
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AD70
_______________________________________________________________________
461. ESTABLISHING RULES AND POLICIES FOR THE USE OF SPECTRUM FOR MOBILE
SATELLITE SERVICE IN THE L-BAND (IB DOCKET NO. 96-132)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 303; 47 USC 316; 47 USC 403
Abstract: The Commission has established licensing policies to govern
mobile-satellite services (MSS) in the L-band. Specifically, the
Commission has modified the license of Motient Services, Inc.
(Motient), the only U.S. MSS system currently authorized to operate in
the L-band, to use up to 20 megahertz of spectrum across the entire L-
band. Previously, Motient was authorized only to operate in the upper
portion of the L-band. In addition, the Commission has adopted and
incorporated into part 25 of the rules specific operational parameters
and technical requirements to ensure the integrity of maritime distress
and safety communications service will not be compromised by MSS
operation in the lower portion of the L-band. Petitions for
reconsideration were filed.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/18/96 61 FR 40772
NPRM Comment Period End 09/23/96
R&O 08/07/02 67 FR 51105
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Andrea Kelly, Chief, Policy Branch, Federal
Communications Commission, International Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7877
Fax: 202 418-0748
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AF89
_______________________________________________________________________
462. ESTABLISHMENT OF RULES AND POLICIES FOR THE DIGITAL AUDIO RADIO
SATELLITE SERVICE IN THE 2310-2360 MHZ FREQUENCY BAND (IB DOCKET NO. 95-
91; GEN DOCKET NO. 90-357)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 151(i); 47 USC 154(j); 47 USC 157;
47 USC 309(j)
Abstract: The Commission is proposing rules to govern satellite digital
audio radio services (SDARS). The Commission adopted service rules for
[[Page 71472]]
SDARS in 1997 and sought further comment on proposed rules governing
the use of complementary terrestrial repeaters. The Commission released
a second further notice of proposed rulemaking in January 2008 to
consider new proposals for rules governing terrestrial repeaters and
operations of Wireless Communications Service (WCS) devices in the
2305--2360 MHz band.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/15/95 60 FR 35166
R&O 03/11/97 62 FR 11083
FNPRM 04/18/97 62 FR 19095
Second FNPRM 01/15/08 73 FR 2437
FNPRM Comment Period End 03/17/08
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Stephen Duall, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, International Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554
Phone: 202 418-1103
Fax: 202 418-0748
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AF93
_______________________________________________________________________
463. ALLOCATE & DESIGNATE: SPEC FOR FIXED-SAT SRV (37.5-38.5, 40.5-41.5
& 48.2-50.2 GHZ BANDS); ALLOCATE: FIXED & MOBILE 40.5-42.5 GHZ; WIRELESS
46.9-47 GHZ; GOV OPER 37-38 & 40-40.5 GHZ (IB DOCKET NO. 97)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 301 and 302; 47 USC 303(e) to
303(g); 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC 304; 47 USC 307
Abstract: This item adopts a plan for non-government operations in the
36.0-51.4 GHz portion of the V-band, establishing priorities for
different services in different parts of this band.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/04/97 62 FR 16129
R&O 01/15/99 64 FR 2585
Correction 02/08/99 64 FR 6138
Correction 02/10/99 64 FR 6565
Notice of Petition for Recon 03/22/99 64 FR 13796
Order on Recon 12/01/99
FNPRM 07/05/01 66 FR 35399
Second R&O 08/25/04 69 FR 52198
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Sean O'More, Federal Communications Commission,
International Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2453
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH23
_______________________________________________________________________
464. SPACE STATION LICENSING REFORM (IB DOCKET NO. 02-34)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 157; 47 USC 303(c); 47 USC
303(g); . . .
Abstract: The Commission has adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
streamline its procedures for reviewing satellite license applications.
Currently, the Commission uses processing rounds to review those
applications. In a processing round, when an application is filed, the
International Bureau (Bureau) issues a public notice establishing a
cut-off date for other mutually exclusive satellite applications, and
then considers all those applications together. In cases where
sufficient spectrum to accommodate all the applicants is not available,
the Bureau directs the applicants to negotiate a mutually agreeable
solution. Those negotiations usually take a long time, and delay
provision of satellite services to the public.
The NPRM invites comment on two alternatives for expediting the
satellite application process. One alternative is to replace the
processing round procedure with a ``first-come, first-served''
procedure that would allow the Bureau to issue a satellite license to
the first party filing a complete, acceptable application. The other
alternative is to streamline the processing round procedure by adopting
one or more of the following proposals: (1) Placing a time limit on
negotiations; (2) establishing criteria to select among competing
applicants; (3) dividing the available spectrum evenly among the
applicants.
In the First Report and Order in this proceeding, the Commission
determined that different procedures were better-suited for different
kinds of satellite applications. For most geostationary orbit (GSO)
satellite applications, the Commission adopted a first-come, first-
served approach. For most non-geostationary orbit (NGSO) satellite
applications, the Commission adopted a procedure in which the available
spectrum is divided evenly among the qualified applicants. The
Commission also adopted measures to discourage applicants from filing
speculative applications, including a bond requirement, payable if a
licensee misses a milestone. The bond amounts originally were $5
million for each GSO satellite, and $7.5 million for each NGSO
satellite system. These were interim amounts. Concurrently with the
First Report and Order, the Commission adopted an FNPRM to determine
whether to revise the bond amounts on a long-term basis.
In the Second Report and Order, the Commission adopted a streamlined
procedure for certain kinds of satellite license modification requests.
In the Third Report and Order in this proceeding, the Commission
adopted a standardized application form for satellite licenses, and
adopted a mandatory electronic filing requirement for certain satellite
applications.
In the Fourth Report and Order in this proceeding, the Commission
extended the mandatory electronic filing requirement to all satellite
applications.
In the Fifth Report and Order in this proceeding, the Commission
revised the bond amounts based on the record developed in response to
FNPRM. The bond amounts are now $3 million for each GSO satellite, and
$5 million for each NGSO satellite system.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/19/02 67 FR 12498
NPRM Comment Period End 07/02/02
Second R&O (Release Date) 06/20/03 68 FR 62247
Second FNPRM (Release Date) 07/08/03 68 FR 53702
Third R&O (Release Date) 07/08/03 68 FR 63994
FNPRM 08/27/03 68 FR 51546
First R&O 08/27/03 68 FR 51499
FNPRM Comment Period End 10/27/03
Fourth R&O (Release Date) 04/16/04 69 FR 67790
Fifth R&O, First Order on Recon
(Release Date) 07/06/04 69 FR 51586
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Steven Spaeth, Assistant Division Chief, Federal
[[Page 71473]]
Communications Commission, International Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1539
Fax: 202 418-0748
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH98
_______________________________________________________________________
465. MITIGATION OF ORBITAL DEBRIS (IB DOCKET NO. 02-54)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 157(a); 47 USC 303(c); 47 USC
303(f) and 303(g); 47 USC 303(r)
Abstract: The Commission has adopted rules that require all entities
seeking FCC authorization for satellite services to address orbital
debris mitigation as part of their application for FCC authorization.
Orbital debris consists of artificial objects orbiting the Earth that
are not functional spacecraft. In addition, the Commission established
requirements for the removal of geostationary spacecraft from
operational orbits at the end of their useful lives and amended the
Commission's rules regarding orbit raising maneuvers, the use of
inclined orbits, and orbital longitudinal tolerance station-keeping
requirements. The Commission indicated that it will seek further
comment on the application of the Commission's longitudinal tolerance
station-keeping requirements for Fixed-Satellite space stations to
space stations in the Mobile-Satellite Service and remote sensing
services.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/03/02 67 FR 22376
NPRM Comment Period End 08/16/02
First R&O 08/27/03 68 FR 59127
Second R&O 09/09/04 69 FR 54581
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Stephen Duall, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, International Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554
Phone: 202 418-1103
Fax: 202 418-0748
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI06
_______________________________________________________________________
466. AMENDMENT OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES (IB DOCKET NO. 04-47)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 34 to 39; 47 USC 151; 47 USC 161; 47 USC 201 to
205; . . .
Abstract: FCC amended several rules. Specifically, FCC: (1) Amended the
procedures for discontinuing an international service; (2) allowed U.S.
carriers to resell the U.S.-inbound service of foreign carriers; and
(3) amended the submarine cable landing licensing procedures compliance
with the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. The North American
Submarine Cable Association filed a petition for reconsideration
regarding the amendment to the submarine cable licensing procedures.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/22/04 69 FR 13276
NPRM Comment Period End 06/07/04
R&O 09/25/07 72 FR 54363
Petition for Recon 01/02/08 73 FR 187
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: David Krech, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, International Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554
Phone: 202 418-1460
Fax: 202 418-2824
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI41
_______________________________________________________________________
467. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR U.S. PROVIDERS OF INTERNATIONAL
TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES (IB DOCKET NO. 04-112)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 161; 47 USC 201 to 205;
. . .
Abstract: FCC is reviewing the reporting requirements to which carriers
providing U.S. international services are subject under 47 CFR part 43.
FCC proposes to amend 47 CFR 43.61 and 47 CFR 43.82 and to repeal 47
CFR 43.53.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/12/04
NPRM Comment Period End 08/23/04 69 FR 29676
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: David Krech, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, International Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554
Phone: 202 418-1460
Fax: 202 418-2824
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI42
_______________________________________________________________________
468. REVIEW OF THE SPECTRUM SHARING PLAN AMONG NON-GEOSTATIONARY
SATELLITE ORBIT MOBILE SATELLITE SERVICE SYSTEMS IN THE 1.6/2.4 GHZ
BANDS (IB DOCKET NO. 02-364)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 302(a); 47 USC 303(e);
. . .
Abstract: This docket involves the spectrum sharing plan for the low
earth orbit satellite systems in the 1.6 GHz and 2.4 GHz bands (Big
LEOs). In November 2007, the Commission resolved the 1.6 GHz spectrum
sharing plan between Globalstar Inc. and Iridium Satellite LLC, whereby
Globalstar will have exclusive MSS use of 7.775 megahertz of spectrum
at 1610-1617.775 MHz, Iridium will have exclusive MSS use of 7.775
megahertz of spectrum at 1618.725-1626.5 MHz, and the two Big LEO
operators will share 0.95 megahertz of spectrum at 1617.775-1618.725
MHz. Separately, in April 2006, the Commission affirmed the spectrum
sharing plan between Globalstar and the fixed and mobile (except
aeronautical mobile) services in the 2495-2500 MHz band in order to
accommodate the relocation of Broadband Radio Service Channel 1 to the
2496-2502 MHz band. (Iridium does not operate in the 2.4 GHz band.)
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/29/03 68 FR 33666
R&O 08/09/04 69 FR 48157
FNPRM 08/09/04 69 FR 48192
Petitions for Recon 10/12/04 69 FR 60626
First Order on Recon 06/19/06 71 FR 35178
Petitions for Further Recon 07/27/06 71 FR 44029
[[Page 71474]]
Second Order on Recon and Second
R&O 12/13/07 72 FR 70807
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Howard Griboff, Deputy Chief, Federal Communications
Commission, International Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554
Phone: 202 418-0657
Fax: 202 418-1414
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI44
_______________________________________________________________________
469. AMENDMENT OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES TO ALLOCATE SPECTRUM AND ADOPT
SERVICE RULES AND PROCEDURES TO GOVERN THE USE OF VEHICLE-MOUNTED EARTH
STATIONS (IB DOCKET NO. 07-101)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i) to (j); 47 USC 157(a); 47
USC 301; 47 USC 303 (c); 47 USC 303 (f); 47 USC 303 (g); 47 USC 303
(r); 47 USC 303 (y); 47 USC 308
Abstract: The Commission seeks comment on the proposed amendment of
parts 2 and 25 of the Commission's rules to allocate spectrum for use
with Vehicle-Mounted Earth Stations (VMES) in the Fixed-Satellite
Service in the Ku-band uplink at 14.0-14.5 GHz and Ku-band downlink
11.72-12.2 GHz on a primary basis, and in the extended Ku-band downlink
at 10.95-11.2 GHz and 11.45-11.7 GHz on a non-protected basis, and to
adopt Ku-band VMES licensing and service rules modeled on the FCC's
rules for Ku-band Earth Stations on Vessels (ESVs). The record in this
proceeding will provide a basis for Commission action to facilitate
introduction of this proposed service.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/08/07 72 FR 39357
NPRM Comment Period End 09/04/07
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Howard Griboff, Deputy Chief, Federal Communications
Commission, International Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554
Phone: 202 418-0657
Fax: 202 418-1414
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI90
_______________________________________________________________________
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Long-Term Actions
Media Bureau
_______________________________________________________________________
470. CABLE TELEVISION RATE REGULATION
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 543
Abstract: The Commission has adopted rate regulations to implement
section 623 of the 1992 Cable Act to ensure that cable subscribers
nationwide enjoy the rates that would be charged by cable systems
operating in a competitive environment. Reconsideration was requested.
The Fourteenth Order on Reconsideration addresses petitions on issues
governing regulated services by cable systems. In a subsequent notice,
comment was sought on recalibrating the competitive differential
between rates of systems subject to effective competition and
noncompetitive systems. In addition, comment was sought as to whether
there may be a different approach to establish reasonable rates on the
basic service tier.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/04/93 58 FR 48
R&O and FNPRM 05/21/93 58 FR 29736
MO&O and FNPRM 08/18/93 58 FR 43816
Third R&O 11/30/93 58 FR 63087
Order on Recon, Fourth R&O, and
Fifth NPRM 04/15/94 59 FR 17943
Third Order on Recon 04/15/94 59 FR 17961
Fifth Order on Recon and FNPRM 10/13/94 59 FR 51869
Fourth Order on Recon 10/21/94 59 FR 53113
Sixth Order on Recon, Fifth R&O,
and Seventh NPRM 12/06/94 59 FR 62614
Seventh Order on Recon 01/25/95 60 FR 4863
Ninth Order on Recon 02/27/95 60 FR 10512
Eighth Order on Recon 03/17/95 60 FR 14373
Sixth R&O and Eleventh Order on
Recon 07/12/95 60 FR 35854
Thirteenth Order on Recon 10/05/95 60 FR 52106
Twelfth Order on Recon 10/26/95 60 FR 54815
Tenth Order on Recon 04/08/96 61 FR 15388
Order on Recon of the First R&O
and FNPRM 04/15/96 61 FR 16447
MO&O 02/12/97 62 FR 6491
Report on Cable Industry Prices 02/24/97 62 FR 8245
R&O 03/31/97 62 FR 15118
Fourteenth Order on Recon 10/15/97 62 FR 53572
NPRM and Order 09/05/02 67 FR 56882
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: John Norton, Deputy Division Chief, Policy Division,
Federal Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7037
TDD Phone: 202 418-7172
Fax: 202 418-1196
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AF41
_______________________________________________________________________
471. CABLE TELEVISION RATE REGULATION: COST OF SERVICE
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 543
Abstract: The Commission has established rules pursuant to which cable
operators may set rates for regulated cable service in accordance with
traditional cost-of-service principles, as modified to take account of
unique characteristics of the cable industry. In the latest NPRM,
comment was sought on rule changes that may be necessary or desirable
in order to account for changes in the regulatory
[[Page 71475]]
process resulting from the end of the Commission's statutory authority
to regulate certain tiers of cable programming service.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/30/93 58 FR 40762
R&O 04/15/94 59 FR 17975
Second NPRM 04/15/94 59 FR 18066
MO&O 10/14/94 59 FR 52087
Second R&O/First Order on Recon/
FNPRM 03/08/96 61 FR 9361
Correction 03/22/96 61 FR 11749
NPRM and Order 09/05/02 67 FR 56882
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: John Norton, Deputy Division Chief, Policy Division,
Federal Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7037
TDD Phone: 202 418-7172
Fax: 202 418-1196
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AF48
_______________________________________________________________________
472. CABLE HOME WIRING
Legal Authority: 47 USC 544(i)
Abstract: On October 6, 1997, the FCC adopted a Report and Order and
Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-376) that amends its cable
inside wiring rules to enhance competition in the video distribution
marketplace. The Second FNPRM seeks comment on, among other things,
whether there are circumstances where the FCC should adopt restrictions
on exclusive contracts in order to further promote competition in the
multiple dwelling unit marketplace. The 2nd Report and Order addresses
multiple dwelling units when the occupant charges video service
providers. In the First Order on Reconsideration and the Second Report
and Order, the Commission modified its rules in part. The United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit remanded a
portion of the Commission decision back to the Commission for further
consideration. In September 2004, the Commission issued an FNPRM in
response to the courts decision. The subsequent Report and Order and
Declaratory Ruling concluded that cable wiring behind sheet rock is
physically inaccessible for determining the demarcation point.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/17/92 57 FR 54209
R&O 03/02/93 58 FR 11970
NPRM 02/01/96 61 FR 3657
First Order on Recon & FNPRM 02/16/96 61 FR 6210
FNPRM 09/03/97 62 FR 46453
R&O and Second FNPRM 11/14/97 62 FR 60165
First Order on Recon and Second
R&O 03/21/03 68 FR 13850
FNPRM 10/15/04 69 FR 61193
R&O and Declaratory Ruling 08/30/07 72 FR 50074
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: John Norton, Deputy Division Chief, Policy Division,
Federal Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7037
TDD Phone: 202 418-7172
Fax: 202 418-1196
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG02
_______________________________________________________________________
473. COMPETITIVE AVAILABILITY OF NAVIGATION DEVICES (CS DOCKET NO. 97-
80)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 549
Abstract: The Commission has adopted rules to address the mandate
expressed in section 629 of the Communications Act to ensure the
commercial availability of ``navigation devices,'' the equipment used
to access video programming and other services from multichannel video
programming systems.
Specifically, in 1998, the Commission required MVPDs to make available
by July 1, 2000, a security element separate from the basic navigation
device (e.g., cable set-top boxes, digital video recorders, and
television receivers with navigation capabilities). The separation of
the security element from the host device required by this rule
(referred to as the ``integration ban'') was designed to enable
unaffiliated manufacturers, retailers, and other vendors to
commercially market host devices while allowing MVPDs to retain control
over their system security. MVPDs were permitted to continue providing
equipment with integrated security until January 1, 2005, so long as
modular security components, known as point-of-deployment modules, were
also made available for use with host devices obtained through retail
outlets. In April 2003, in response to requests from cable operators,
the Commission extended the effective date of the integration ban until
July 1, 2006. Then, in 2005, again at the urging of cable operators,
the Commission extended that date until July 1, 2007. Also, in this
proceeding, in April 2003, the Commission adopted unidirectional ``plug
and play'' rules, to govern compatibility between MVPDs and navigation
devices manufactured by consumer electronics manufacturers not
affiliated with cable operators. In June 2007, the Commission solicited
comment on proposed standards to ensure bidirectional compatibility of
cable television systems and consumer electronics equipment.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/05/97 62 FR 10011
R&O 07/15/98 63 FR 38089
Order on Recon 06/02/99 64 FR 29599
FNPRM & Declaratory Ruling 09/28/00 65 FR 58255
FNPRM 01/16/03 68 FR 2278
Order and FNPRM 06/17/03 68 FR 35818
Second R&O 11/28/03 68 FR 66728
FNPRM 11/28/03 68 FR 66776
Order on Recon 01/28/04 69 FR 4081
Second R&O 06/22/05 70 FR 36040
Third FNPRM 07/25/07 72 FR 40818
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Brendan Murray, Attorney Advisor, Policy Division,
Federal Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1573
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG28
_______________________________________________________________________
474. CABLE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL OWNERSHIP LIMITS (MM DOCKET NO. 92-
264)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 303; 47 USC 533
Abstract: Section 613 of the Communications Act requires the Commission
to ``prescribe rules and regulations establishing reasonable limits on
the number of cable
[[Page 71476]]
subscribers a person is authorized to reach through cable systems owned
by such person, or in which such person has an attributable interest.''
On October 8, 1999, the Commission issued a Third Report and Order, FCC
99-289, in this matter. The Commission revised the horizontal ownership
rules as follows: (1) All multichannel video subscribers will be
counted when calculating the 30 percent ownership limit; (2) actual
subscriber numbers, rather than potential subscriber numbers, will be
used for calculating an owner's share; and (3) the minority exception
which allowed a 35 percent ownership limit for minority-owned entities
under certain circumstances was eliminated. On March 2, 2001, the
District of Columbia Circuit Court reversed and remanded the cable
horizontal and vertical limits, as well as two aspects of the
attribution rules used to determine compliance with these limits. (Time
Warner Entertainment Co. v. FCC, 240 F.3d 1126 (DC cir. 2001)).
Pursuant to the court's remand, the Commission solicited comment in a
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (September 2001) and a Second
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
In the Fourth Report & Order, the Commission set the cable horizontal
ownership limit at 30 percent. In the accompanying Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, comment was sought on issues regarding the cable
attribution rules and appropriate channel occupancy limits.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Second MO&O on Recon and FNPRM 07/14/98 63 FR 37790
Third R&O 12/01/99 64 FR 67198
Order on Recon 03/08/00 65 FR 12135
MO&O 06/08/00 65 FR 36382
FNPRM 10/11/01 66 FR 51905
Second FNPRM 06/18/05 70 FR 33680
Fourth R&O and FNPRM 02/29/08 73 FR 11048
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Royce Sherlock, Chief, Industry Analysis Division,
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554
Phone: 202 418-7030
Fax: 202 418-1196
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH09
_______________________________________________________________________
475. DIGITAL AUDIO BROADCASTING SYSTEMS (MM DOCKET NO. 99-325)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 303
Abstract: The rulemaking proceeding was initiated to foster the
development and implementation of terrestrial digital audio
broadcasting (DAB). The transition to DAB promises the benefits that
have generally accompanied digitalization--better audio fidelity, more
robust transmission systems, and the possibility of new auxiliary
services. In the First Report and Order, the Commission selected in-
band, on-channel as the technology that will permit AM and FM radio
broadcasters to introduce digital operations. Consideration of formal
standard-setting procedures and related broadcasting licensing and
service rule changes are addressed in a Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking. Further technical guidance is provided in a Second Report
and Order.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/09/99 64 FR 61054
First R&O 12/23/02 67 FR 78193
FNPRM and NOI 05/14/04 69 FR 27815
Second R&O 08/15/07 72 FR 45712
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Peter Doyle, Chief, Audio Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2700
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH40
_______________________________________________________________________
476. SECOND PERIODIC REVIEW OF RULES AND POLICIES AFFECTING THE
CONVERSION TO DTV
Legal Authority: 47 USC 4(i) and 4(j); 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC 307; 47
USC 309; 47 USC 336
Abstract: On January 18, 2001, the Commission adopted a Report and
Order (R&O) and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, addressing a
number of issues related to the conversion of the nation's broadcast
television system from analog to digital television. The Second Report
and Order resolved several major technical issues including the issue
of receiver performance standards, DTV tuners, and revisions to certain
components of the DTV transmission standard. A subsequent NPRM
commenced the Commission's second periodic review of the progress of
the digital television conversion. The resulting R&O adopted a multi-
step process to create a new DTV table of allotments and
authorizations. Also in the R&O, the Commission adopted replication and
maximization deadlines for DTV broadcasters and updated rules in
recognition revisions to broadcast transmission standards.
The Second R&O adopts disclosure requirements for televisions that do
not include a digital tuner.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/23/00 65 FR 15600
R&O 02/13/01 66 FR 9973
MO&O 12/18/01 66 FR 65122
Third MO&O and Order on Recon 10/02/02 67 FR 61816
Second R&O and Second MO&O 10/11/02 67 FR 63290
NPRM 02/18/03 68 FR 7737
R&O 10/04/04 69 FR 59500
Second R&O 05/10/07 72 FR 26554
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Eloise Gore, Associate Bureau Chief, Federal
Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1066
TDD Phone: 202 418-7172
Fax: 202 418-1069
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH54
_______________________________________________________________________
477. DIRECT BROADCAST PUBLIC INTEREST OBLIGATIONS (MM DOCKET NO. 93-25)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 335
Abstract: The Commission adopted rules in 1998 that implement section
25 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of
1992, as codified at section 335 of the Communications Act of 1934.
Section 335 directs the Commission to impose certain public interest
obligations on direct broadcast satellite providers. Several petitions
for reconsideration are pending.
[[Page 71477]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/08/93 58 FR 12917
R&O 02/08/99 64 FR 52399
Order on Recon 04/22/04 69 FR 21761
Order on Recon 04/28/04 69 FR 23155
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Rosalee Chiara, Staff Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0754
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH59
_______________________________________________________________________
478. REVISION OF EEO RULES AND POLICIES (MM DOCKET NO. 98-204)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 257; 47 USC 301; 47 USC
303; 47 USC 307 to 309; 47 USC 334; 47 USC 403; 47 USC 554
Abstract: FCC authority to govern Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)
responsibilities of cable television operators was codified in the
Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984. This authority was extended to
television broadcast licensees and other multi-channel video
programming distributors in the Cable and Television Consumer
Protection Act of 1992. In the Second Report and Order, the FCC adopted
new EEO rules and policies. This action was in response to a decision
of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that
found prior EEO rules unconstitutional. The Third Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking requests comment as to the applicability of the EEO rules to
part-time employees. The Third Report and Order adopted revised forms
for broadcast station and MVPDs Annual Employment Report. In the Fourth
NPRM, comment was sought regarding public access to the data contained
in the forms.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/14/02 67 FR 1704
Second R&O and Third NPRM 01/07/03 68 FR 670
Correction 01/13/03 68 FR 1657
Fourth NPRM 06/23/04 69 FR 34986
Third R&O 06/23/04 69 FR 34950
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Lewis Pulley, Asst. Chief, Policy Division, Media
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1450
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH95
_______________________________________________________________________
479. BROADCAST MULTIPLE AND CROSS-OWNERSHIP LIMITS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 152(a); 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303;
47 USC 307; 47 USC 309 and 310
Abstract: In 2002, the Commission undertook a comprehensive review of
its broadcast multiple and cross-ownership limits examining: cross
ownership of TV and radio stations; local TV ownership limits; national
TV cap; and dual network rule.
The Report and Order replaced the newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership
and radio and TV rules with a tiered approach based on the number of
television stations in a market. Petitions for Reconsideration are
pending. Also, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals remanded portions of
the Commission's decisions. In June 2006, the Commission adopted a
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiating the 2006 review of the
broadcast ownership rules. The further notice also sought comment on
how to address the issues raised by the Third Circuit. Additional
questions are raised for comment in a Second Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking.
In the Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, the Commission
adopts rule changes regarding newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership, but
otherwise generally retains the other broadcast ownership rules
currently in effect.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/05/01 66 FR 50991
R&O 08/05/03 68 FR 46286
Public Notice 02/19/04 69 FR 9216
FNPRM 08/09/06 71 FR 4511
Second FNPRM 08/08/07 72 FR 44539
R&O and Order on Recon 02/21/08 73 FR 9481
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Mania K. Baghdadi, Deputy Division Chief, Industry
Analysis Division, Federal Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2130
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH97
_______________________________________________________________________
480. DIGITAL BROADCAST CONTENT PROTECTION (MB DOCKET NO. 02-230)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 303; 47 USC 403; 47 USC 601
Abstract: This rulemaking examines the use of a content protection
mechanism for digital broadcast television. The Report and Order
adopted an anti-piracy mechanism known as the ``broadcast flag.''
Products capable of receiving DTV over-the-air signals must comply with
the broadcast flag requirements by July 1, 2005. The further notice of
proposed rulemaking seeks comment on the process for approving digital
recording and output content protection technologies.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/20/02 67 FR 53903
R&O 12/03/03 68 FR 67599
FNPRM 12/03/03 68 FR 67624
Final Rule 01/20/04 69 FR 2688
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Susan Mort, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1043
Fax: 202 418-1069
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI37
_______________________________________________________________________
481. ESTABLISHMENT OF RULES FOR DIGITAL LOW POWER TELEVISION, TELEVISION
TRANSLATOR, AND TELEVISION BOOSTER STATIONS (MB DOCKET NO. 03-185)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 309; 47 USC 336
Abstract: This proceeding initiates the digital television conversion
for low power television (LPTV) and television translator stations. The
rules and policies adopted as a result of this proceeding provide the
framework for these stations' conversion from analog
[[Page 71478]]
to digital broadcasting. The Report and Order adopts definitions and
permissible use provisions for digital TV translator and LPTV stations.
Petitions for reconsideration of the Report and Order are pending
resolution.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/26/03 68 FR 55566
R&O 11/29/04 69 FR 69325
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Keith Larson, Chief Engineer, Media Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2607
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI38
_______________________________________________________________________
482. JOINT SALES AGREEMENTS IN LOCAL TELEVISION MARKETS (MB DOCKET NO.
04-256)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151 to 152(a); 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303; . . .
Abstract: A joint sales agreement (JSA) is an agreement with a licensee
of a brokered station that authorizes a broker to sell some or all of
the advertising time for the brokered station in return for a fee or
percentage of revenues paid to the licensee. The Commission has sought
comment on whether TV JSAs should be attributed for purposes of
determining compliance with the Commission's multiple ownership rules.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/26/04 69 FR 52464
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Debra Sabourin, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, Mass Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2130
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI55
_______________________________________________________________________
483. SIGNIFICANTLY VIEWED OUT-OF-MARKET BROADCAST STATIONS (MB DOCKET
NO. 05-49)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i) and 154(j); 47 USC 340
Abstract: Section 202 of the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and
Reauthorization Act of 2004 creates section 340 of the Communications
Act, which provides satellite carries with the authority to offer
Commission determined ``significantly viewed'' signals of out-of-market
broadcast stations to subscribers. In the NPRM, comment was sought on
implementation of section 340. The resulting Report and Order adopted a
list of significantly viewed stations and procedures for stations to
petition the Commission for inclusion on the list.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/08/05 70 FR 11314
R&O 12/27/05 70 FR 76504
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Evan Baranoff, Attorney, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2120
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI56
_______________________________________________________________________
484. REVISION OF PROCEDURES GOVERNING AMENDMENTS TO FM TABLE OF
ALLOTMENTS AND CHANGES OF COMMUNITY OF LICENSE IN THE RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES (MB DOCKET NO. 05-210)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 303
Abstract: The rulemaking was initiated to reduce backlog in, and
streamline, the FM allotment procedures and, to a lesser extent,
streamline certain procedures pertaining to AM applications. Although
the Commission has made important changes to streamline the processing
of radio broadcast applications, the basic procedures for amending the
Table have not changed since 1982. The Notice seeks comment on a number
of specific rule and procedural changes in the handling of FM and AM
applications and rulemaking petitions to amend the Table. In the area
of applications procedures, the Notice seeks comments on various
proposals designed to encourage only bona fide proponents to submit
petitions and to limit the complexity of such petitions. If these
changes are adopted, it will expedite the approval and implementation
on new and upgraded radio service to the public. The Report and Order
adopted the proposals from the notice.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/22/05 70 FR 44537
NPRM Comment Period End 10/03/05
R&O 12/20/06 71 FR 76208
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Tom Nessinger, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2709
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI63
_______________________________________________________________________
485. DIGITAL TELEVISION DISTRIBUTED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES (MB
DOCKET NO. 05-312)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i) to 154(j); 47 USC 157; 47
USC 301; . . .
Abstract: A digital television transmission system (DTS) employs
multiple synchronized transmitters spread around a station's service
area. Such distributed transmitters fill in unserved areas in the
parent station's coverage area. The notice of proposed rulemaking
examines issues related to the use of DTS and proposes rules for future
DTS operation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/07/05 70 FR 72763
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Evan Baranoff, Attorney, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2120
[[Page 71479]]
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI68
_______________________________________________________________________
486. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CABLE COMMUNICATIONS POLICY ACT OF 1984 AS
AMENDED BY THE CABLE TELEVISION CONSUMER PROTECTION AND COMPETITION ACT
OF 1992
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 541(a)(1); 47 USC
556(c)
Abstract: Section 621(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, states in relevant part that ``a franchising authority . .
.may not unreasonably refuse to award an additional competitive
franchise.'' The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Notice) solicits
comment on implementation of section 621(a)(1)'s directive, and whether
the franchising process unreasonably impedes the achievement of the
interrelated Federal goals of enhanced cable competition and
accelerated broadband deployment and, if so, how the Commission should
act to address that problem.
The subsequent Report and Order found that certain actions by local
franchising authorities constitute an unreasonable refusal to award a
competitive franchise within the meaning of section 621(a)(1). The item
included a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on how
the findings should affect existing franchises.
In the Second Report and Order, a number of the rules promulgated in
this docket are extended to incumbent cable operators.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/19/05 70 FR 73973
R&O and FNPRM 03/21/07 72 FR 13230
Second R&O 11/23/07 72 FR 65670
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Holly Saurer, Attorney Advisor, Policy Division,
Federal Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7283
Fax: 202 418-1069
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI69
_______________________________________________________________________
487. PROGRAM ACCESS RULES--SUNSET OF EXCLUSIVE CONTRACTS PROHIBITION &
EXAMINATION OF PROGRAMMING TYING ARRANGEMENTS; (MB DOCKET NOS. 07-29,
07-198)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 548
Abstract: The program access provisions of the Communications Act
(section 628) generally prohibit exclusive contracts for satellite
delivered programming between programmers in which a cable operator has
an attributable interest (vertically integrated programmers) and cable
operators. This limitation was set to expire on October 5, 2007, unless
circumstances in the video programming marketplace indicate that an
extension of the prohibition continues ``to be necessary to preserve
and protect competition and diversity in the distribution of video
programming.`` The proceeding undertakes the required review. The
Report and Order concluded the prohibition continues to be necessary,
and accordingly, retained it until October 5, 2012. The accompanying
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking sought comment on revisions to the
Commission's program access and retransmission consent rules.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/01/07 72 FR 9289
R&O 10/04/07 72 FR 56645
NPRM 10/31/07 72 FR 61590
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: David Konczal, Federal Communications Commission, Media
Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2228
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI87
_______________________________________________________________________
488. THIRD PERIODIC REVIEW OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES AND POLICIES
AFFECTING THE CONVERSION TO DIGITAL TELEVISION (MB DOCKET NO. 07-91)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 154(j); 47 USC 301
to 303; 47 USC 307 to 309; 47 USC 312; 47 USC 316; 47 USC 318 and 319;
47 USC 324 and 325; 47 USC 336 and 337
Abstract: Congress has mandated that after February 17, 2009, full-
power broadcast stations must transmit only in digital signals, and may
no longer transmit analog signals. This proceeding is the Commission's
third periodic review of the transition of the nation's broadcast
television system from analog to digital television (DTV). The
Commission conducts these periodic reviews in order to assess the
progress of the transition and make any necessary adjustments to the
Commission's rules and policies to facilitate the introduction of DTV
service and the recovery of spectrum at the end of the transition. In
this review, the Commission considers how to ensure that broadcasters
complete construction of their final post-transition (digital)
facilities by the statutory deadline.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/09/07 72 FR 37310
R&O (released) 01/30/07
Order on Clarification 07/10/08 73 FR 39623
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Evan Baranoff, Attorney, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2120
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI89
_______________________________________________________________________
489. DTV CONSUMER EDUCATION INITIATIVE (MB DOCKET NO. 07-148)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC 335 and 336
Abstract: Congress has mandated that after February 17, 2009, full-
power broadcast stations must transmit only in digital signals, and may
no longer transmit analog signals. From the beginning of the digital
transition, the Commission has been committed to working with
representatives from industry, public interest groups, and Congress to
make the significant benefits of digital broadcasting available to the
public. The digital transition will make valuable spectrums available
for both public safety uses and expanded wireless competition and
innovation. It will also provide consumers with better quality
television picture and sound, and make
[[Page 71480]]
new services available through multicasting. These innovations,
however, are dependent upon widespread consumer understanding of the
benefits and the mechanics of the transition. While the Commission has
been engaged in various DTV outreach efforts, this proceeding was
initiated to seek public comment on whether there are additional steps
relating to consumer education about the digital transition which the
Commission should take.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/16/07 72 FR 46014
NPRM Comment Period End 09/17/07
R&O 03/24/08 73 FR 15431
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Lyle Elder, Policy Division, Media Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2120
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI96
_______________________________________________________________________
490. BROADCAST LOCALISM (MB DOCKET NO. 04-233)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303; 47 USC 532; 47 USC 536
Abstract: The concept of localism has been a cornerstone of broadcast
regulation. The Commission has consistently held that as temporary
trustee of the public's airwaves, broadcasters are obligated to operate
their stations to serve the public interest. Specifically, broadcasters
are required to air programming responsive to the needs and issues of
the people in their licensed communities. The Commission opened this
proceeding to seek input on a number of issues related to broadcast
localism.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/13/08 73 FR 8255
NPRM Comment Period End 03/14/08
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: William Freedman, Associate Chief, Media Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554
Phone: 202 418-1415
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AJ04
_______________________________________________________________________
491. CREATING A LOW POWER RADIO SERVICE (MM DOCKET
NO. 99-25)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151 to 152; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303; 47 USC
403; 47 USC 405
Abstract: This proceeding was initiated to establish a new
noncommercial educational low power FM radio service for non-profit
community organizations and public safety entities. In January 2000,
the Commission adopted a Report and Order establishing two classes of
LPFM stations, 100 watt (LP100) and 10 watt (LP10) facilities, with
service radii of approximately 3.5 miles and 1-2 miles, respectively.
The Report and Order also established ownership and eligibility rules
for the LPFM service. The Commission generally restricted ownership to
entities with no attributable interest in any other broadcast station
or other media. To choose among entities filing mutually exclusive
applications for LPFM licenses, the Commission established a point
system favoring local ownership and locally-originated programming. The
Report and Order imposed separation requirements for LPFM with respect
to full power stations operating on co-, first- and second-adjacent and
intermediate frequency (IF) channels. In December 2000, legislation was
enacted that required the Commission to modify its rules to (i)
prescribe LPFM station third-adjacent channel interference protection
standards and (ii) prohibit any applicant from obtaining an LPFM
station license if the applicant previously has engaged in the
unlicensed operation of a station. In March 2001, the Commission
adopted a Second Report and Order implementing this statute.
In a Further Notice issued in 2005, the Commission reexamined some of
its rules governing the LPFM service, noting that the rules may
adjustment in order to ensure that the Commission maximizes the value
of the LPFM service without harming the interests of full-power FM
stations or other Commission licensees. The Commission sought comment
on a number of issues with respect to LPFM ownership restrictions and
eligibility.
The Third Report and Order resolves issues raised in the Further
Notice. The accompanying Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
considers rule changes to avoid the potential loss of LPFM stations.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/16/99 64 FR 2577
R&O 02/15/00 65 FR 7616
MO&O and Order on Recon 11/09/00 65 FR 67289
Second R&O 05/10/01 66 FR 238611
Second Order on Recon and FNPRM 07/07/05 70 FR 3918
Third R&O and Second FNPRM 01/17/08 73 FR 3202
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Peter Doyle, Chief, Audio Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2700
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AJ07
_______________________________________________________________________
492. SPONSORSHIP IDENTIFICATION RULES AND EMBEDDED
ADVERTISING (MB DOCKET NO. 08-90)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 154(j); 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC
303(a); 47 USC 317; 47 USC 405; 47 USC 508
Abstract: The Commission undertook this proceeding to seek comment on
the relationship between the Commission's sponsorship identification
rules and the increasing reliance on industry by embedded advertising
techniques. Due to recent technological changes that allow consumers to
more easily bypass traditional commercial content, content providers
may be turning to more subtle and sophisticated means of incorporating
commercial messages into programming. The NPRM will seek to determine
how embedded advertising affects the efficacy of the sponsorship
identification rules in protecting the public's right to know who is
paying to air commercials or other programming matter on broadcast
outlets and cable television systems.
[[Page 71481]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM & NOI 07/24/08 73 FR 43194
NPRM Comment Period End 09/22/08
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Brendan Murray, Attorney Advisor, Policy Division,
Federal Communications Commission, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1573
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AJ10
_______________________________________________________________________
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Long-Term Actions
Office of Managing Director
_______________________________________________________________________
493. ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF REGULATORY FEES
Legal Authority: 47 USC 159
Abstract: Section 9 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
U.S.C. 159, requires the FCC to recover the cost of its activities by
assessing and collecting annual regulatory fees from beneficiaries of
the activities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/06/06 71 FR 17410
R&O 08/02/06 71 FR 43842
NPRM 05/02/07 72 FR 20213
R&O and FNPRM 08/16/07 72 FR 46010
NPRM 05/28/08 73 FR 30563
R&O and FNPRM 08/26/08 73 FR 50201
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Mika Savir, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Office of the Managing Director, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0384
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI79
_______________________________________________________________________
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Long-Term Actions
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
_______________________________________________________________________
494. REVISION OF THE RULES TO ENSURE COMPATIBILITY WITH ENHANCED 911
EMERGENCY CALLING SYSTEMS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 134(i); 47 USC 151; 47 USC 201; 47 USC 208; 47
USC 215; 47 USC 303; 47 USC 309
Abstract: In a series of orders in several related proceedings issued
since 1996, the Federal Communications Commission has taken action to
improve the quality and reliability of 911 emergency services for
wireless phone users. Rules have been adopted governing the
availability of basic 911 services and the implementation of enhanced
911 (E911) for wireless services.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
FNPRM 08/02/96 61 FR 40374
R&O 08/02/96 61 FR 40348
MO&O 01/16/98 63 FR 2631
Second R&O 06/28/99 64 FR 34564
Third R&O 11/04/99 64 FR 60126
Second MO&O 12/29/99 64 FR 72951
Fourth R&O, Third NPRM, and NPRM09/19/00 65 FR 56752
Fourth MO&O 10/02/00 65 FR 58657
FNPRM 06/13/01 66 FR 31878
Order 11/02/01 66 FR 55618
R&O 05/23/02 67 FR 36112
Public Notice 07/17/02 67 FR 46909
Order to Stay 07/26/02
Order on Recon 01/22/03 68 FR 2914
FNPRM 01/23/03 68 FR 3214
Second R & O, Second FNPRM 02/11/04 69 FR 6578
Second R&O 09/07/04 69 FR 54037
NPRM 06/01/07 72 FR 33948
NPRM Comment Period End 08/20/07
Order on Recon 10/11/07 72 FR 57879
R&O 02/14/08 73 FR 8617
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Tom Beers, Chief, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau,
445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0952
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG34
_______________________________________________________________________
495. ENHANCED 911 SERVICES FOR WIRELINE
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 201; 47 USC 222; 47
USC 251
Abstract: The rules generally will assist State governments in drafting
legislation that will ensure that multi-line telephone systems are
compatible with the enhanced 911 network.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/11/94 59 FR 54878
FNPRM 01/23/03 68 FR 3214
Second FNPRM 02/11/04 69 FR 6595
R&O 02/11/04 69 FR 6578
Public Notice 01/13/05 70 FR 2405
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Tom Beers, Chief, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau,
445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0952
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG60
_______________________________________________________________________
496. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ASSISTANCE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT
ACT
Legal Authority: 47 USC 229; 47 USC 1001 to 1008
Abstract: All of the decisions in this proceeding thus far are aimed at
implementation of provisions of the Communications Assistance for Law
Enforcement Act.
[[Page 71482]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/10/97 62 FR 63302
Order 01/13/98 63 FR 1943
FNPRM 11/16/98 63 FR 63639
R&O 01/29/99 64 FR 51462
Order 03/29/99 64 FR 14834
Second R&O 09/23/99 64 FR 51462
Third R&O 09/24/99 64 FR 51710
Order on Recon 09/28/99 64 FR 52244
Policy Statement 10/12/99 64 FR 55164
Second Order on Recon 05/04/01 66 FR 22446
Order 10/05/01 66 FR 50841
Order on Remand 05/02/02 67 FR 21999
NPRM 09/23/04 69 FR 56976
First R&O 10/13/05 70 FR 59704
Second R&O 07/05/06 71 FR 38091
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Tom Beers, Chief, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau,
445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0952
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG74
_______________________________________________________________________
497. DEVELOPMENT OF OPERATIONAL, TECHNICAL, AND SPECTRUM REQUIREMENTS
FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS REQUIREMENTS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 160; 47 USC 201 and
202; 47 USC 303; 47 USC 337(a); 47 USC 403
Abstract: This item takes steps toward developing a flexible regulatory
framework to meet vital current and future public safety communications
needs.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/09/97 62 FR 60199
Second NPRM 11/07/97 62 FR 60199
First R&O 11/02/98 63 FR 58645
Third NPRM 11/02/98 63 FR 58685
MO&O 11/04/99 64 FR 60123
Second R&O 08/08/00 65 FR 48393
Fourth NPRM 08/25/00 65 FR 51788
Second MO&O 09/05/00 65 FR 53641
Third MO&O 11/07/00 65 FR 66644
Third R&O 11/07/00 65 FR 66644
Fifth NPRM 02/16/01 66 FR 10660
Fourth R&O 02/16/01 66 FR 10632
MO&O 09/27/02 67 FR 61002
NPRM 11/08/02 67 FR 68079
R&O 12/13/02 67 FR 76697
NPRM 04/27/05 70 FR 21726
R&O 04/27/05 70 FR 21671
NPRM 04/07/06 71 FR 17786
NPRM 09/21/06 71 FR 55149
Ninth NPRM 01/10/07 72 FR 1201
Ninth NPRM Comment Period End 02/26/07
R&O and FNPRM 05/02/07 72 FR 24238
R&O and FNPRM Comment Period End05/23/07
Second R&O 08/24/07 72 FR 48814
Second FNPRM 05/21/08 73 FR 29582
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jeff Cohen, Senior Legal Counsel, Federal
Communications Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau,
445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0799
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG85
_______________________________________________________________________
498. 1998 BIENNIAL REGULATORY REVIEW--REVIEW OF ACCOUNTS SETTLEMENT IN
MARITIME MOBILE AND MARITIME MOBILE-SATELLITE RADIO SERVICES; (IB DOCKET
NO. 98-96)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i) and 154(j); 47 USC 201 to 205; 47 USC
303(r)
Abstract: The FCC seeks comment regarding Accounts Settlement in the
Maritime Mobile and Maritime Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) Radio
Services.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/24/98 63 FR 39800
FNPRM 07/28/99 64 FR 40808
R&O 07/28/99 64 FR 40774
Comment Period Extended 09/03/99 64 FR 48337
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Timothy Peterson, Chief of Staff, PSHSB, Federal
Communications Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau,
445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1575
RIN: 3060-AH30
_______________________________________________________________________
499. IMPLEMENTATION OF 911 ACT
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i) and 154(j); 47 USC 157; 47
USC 160; 47 USC 202; 47 USC 208; 47 USC 210; 47 USC 214; 47 USC 251(e);
47 USC 301; 47 USC 303; 47 USC 308 to 309(j); 47 USC 310
Abstract: This proceeding is separate from the Commission's proceeding
on Enhanced 911 Emergency Systems (E911) in that it is intended to
implement provisions of the Wireless Communications and Public Safety
Act of 1999 through the promotion of public safety by the deployment of
a seamless, nationwide emergency communications infrastructure that
includes wireless communications services. More specifically, a chief
goal of the proceeding is to ensure that all emergency calls are routed
to the appropriate local emergency authority to provide assistance. The
E911 proceeding goes a step further and is aimed at improving the
effectiveness and reliability of wireless 911 dispatchers with
additional information on wireless 911 calls.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Rule 01/25/02 67 FR 3621
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: David H. Siehl, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, 445 12th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1313
Fax: 202 418-2816
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH90
_______________________________________________________________________
500. COMMISSION RULES CONCERNING DISRUPTIONS TO COMMUNICATIONS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303(r)
Abstract: The Report and Order extended the Commission's disruption
reporting requirements to communications providers who are not wireline
carriers. The Commission also streamlined compliance with the reporting
requirements through
[[Page 71483]]
electronic filing with a ``fill in the blank'' template and by
simplifying the application of that rule. In addition, the Commission
delegates authority to the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology,
to make the revisions to the filing system and template necessary to
improve the efficiency of reporting and to reduce, where reasonably
possible, the time for providers to prepare, and for the Commission
staff to review, the communications disruption reports required to be
filed. Such authority was subsequently delegated to the Chief of the
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau. These actions will allow
the Commission to obtain the necessary information regarding service
disruptions in an efficient and expeditious manner and to achieve
significant concomitant public interest benefits.
The Commission received nine petitions for reconsideration in this
proceeding, which are pending.
The further notice of proposed rulemaking expands the record in the
proceeding to focus specifically on the unique communications needs of
airports, including wireless and satellite communications. In this
regard, the Commission requested comment on the additional types of
airport communications (e.g., wireless, satellite) that should be
required to file service disruption reports--particularly from a
homeland security and defense perspective. These types of airport
communications may include, for example, communications that are
provided by ARINC as well as commercial communications (e.g., air-to-
ground and ground-to-air telephone communications) as well as intra-
airline commercial links. The Commission also requested comment on
whether the outage-reporting requirements for special facilities should
be extended to cover general aviation airports (GA) and, if so, what
the applicable threshold criteria should be.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/26/04 69 FR 15761
FNPRM 11/26/04 69 FR 68859
R&O 12/03/04 69 FR 70316
Announcement of Effective Date
and Partial Stay 12/30/04 69 FR 78338
Petition for Recon 02/15/05 70 FR 7737
Amendment of Delegated Authority02/21/08 73 FR 9462
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Lisa Fowlkes, Deputy Bureau Chief, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Public
Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington,
DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7452
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI22
_______________________________________________________________________
501. E911 REQUIREMENTS FOR IP-ENABLED SERVICE PROVIDERS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i) and 154(j); 47 USC 251(e);
47 USC 303(r)
Abstract: The notice seeks comment on what additional steps the
Commission should take to ensure that providers of voice-over Internet
protocol services that interconnect with the public switched telephone
network provide ubiquitous and reliable enhanced 911 service.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/29/05 70 FR 37307
NPRM Comment Period End 09/12/05
NPRM 06/20/07 72 FR 33948
NPRM Comment Period End 07/11/07
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Tom Beers, Chief, Policy Division, Federal
Communications Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau,
445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0952
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI62
_______________________________________________________________________
502. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INDEPENDENT PANEL REVIEWING THE IMPACT OF
HURRICANE KATRINA ON COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 218; 47 USC 303(r)
Abstract: In the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in EB Docket No. 06-119,
the Commission initiated a comprehensive rulemaking to address and
implement the recommendations presented by the Independent Panel
Reviewing the Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Communications Networks
(Independent Panel). The Independent Panel's report described the
impact of one of the worst natural disasters in the Nation's history as
well as the overall public and private response efforts. In addition,
the report included recommendations which relate to: (1) Pre-
positioning the communications industry and the government for
disasters in order to achieve greater network reliability and
resiliency; (2) improving recovery coordination to address existing
shortcomings and to maximize the use of existing resources; (3)
improving the operability and interoperability of public safety and 911
communications in times of crisis; and (4) improving communication of
emergency information to the public. The Commission, in this
proceeding, is to take the lessons learned from this disaster and build
upon them to promote more effective, efficient response and recovery
efforts as well as heightened readiness and preparedness in the future.
To accomplish this goal, the Commission invited comment on what actions
the Commission can take to address the Independent Panel's
recommendations.
In the Order released June 8, 2007 (EB Docket No. 06-119 and WC Docket
No. 06-63), the Commission directed the Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau to implement several of the recommendations made by the
Independent Panel. The Commission also adopted rules requiring some
communications providers to have emergency/backup power and requiring
certain communications providers to conduct analyses and submit reports
on the redundancy and resiliency of their 911 and E911 networks and/or
systems. Finally, the Commission extended limited regulatory relief
from Section 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
previously accorded by the Wireline Competition Bureau.
In an Order on Reconsideration released on October 4, 2007, the
Commission considered six petitions for reconsideration and/or
clarification of the June 2007 Order that adopted the backup power rule
(section 12.2 of the Commission's rules). The Order on
[[Page 71484]]
Reconsideration granted in part and denied in part the petitions. The
Commission modified the backup power rule to address several
meritorious issues raised by petitioners. This modification will
facilitate carrier compliance and reduce the burden on local exchange
carriers and commercial mobile radio service providers, while
continuing to further important homeland security and public safety
goals.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/07/06 71 FR 38564
Order 07/11/07 72 FR 37655
Delay of Effective Date of Rule 08/10/07 72 FR 44978
Petitions for Recon 08/20/07 72 FR 46485
Order on Recon 10/11/07 72 FR 57879
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Lisa Fowlkes, Deputy Bureau Chief, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Public
Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington,
DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7452
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI78
_______________________________________________________________________
503. THE COMMERCIAL MOBILE ALERT SYSTEM
Legal Authority: PL 109-347 title VI; EO 13407; 47 USC 151; 47 USC
154(i)
Abstract: In the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Commission
initiated a comprehensive rulemaking to establish a commercial mobile
alert system under which commercial mobile service providers may elect
to transmit emergency alerts to the public.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/03/08 73 FR 545
NPRM Comment Period End 02/04/08
First R&O 07/24/08 73 FR 43009
Second R&O 08/14/08 73 FR 47550
FNPRM 08/14/08 73 FR 47568
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Lisa Fowlkes, Deputy Bureau Chief, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Public
Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington,
DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7452
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AJ03
_______________________________________________________________________
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Long-Term Actions
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
_______________________________________________________________________
504. AMENDMENT OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES CONCERNING MARITIME
COMMUNICATIONS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 303
Abstract: Amendment of the Maritime Radio Service Rules to encourage
growth and improve the regulatory structure in VHF maritime
communications.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NOI/NPRM 11/05/92 57 FR 57717
FNPRM 04/26/95 60 FR 35507
First R&O 04/26/95 60 FR 34198
Second FNPRM 06/17/97 62 FR 37533
Second R&O 06/17/97 62 FR 40281
Third R&O and MO&O 07/06/98 63 FR 40059
MO&O 04/26/99 64 FR 26885
Third NPRM 12/08/00 65 FR 76966
Fourth R&O 12/13/00 65 FR 77821
Fourth NPRM 02/04/02 67 FR 5080
Second MO&O and Fifth R&O 07/25/02 67 FR 48560
R&O 08/13/03 68 FR 48446
MO&O 04/15/04 69 FR 19947
Correcting Amendment 07/26/04 69 FR 44471
Second R&O and Sixth R&O 11/08/04 69 FR 64664
Final Rule 10/12/06 71 FR 60075
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jeff Tobias, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0680
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AF14
_______________________________________________________________________
505. RESALE AND ROAMING OBLIGATIONS PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL MOBILE
RADIO SERVICES
Legal Authority: PL 103-66, sec 6002, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
of 1993
Abstract: On an interim basis, the First Report and Order extends to
broadband PCS and covered SMR providers the cellular rule that
prohibits restricting resale of communications services. The new rules
sunset five years after the last group of initial licensees for
currently allocated broadband PCS spectrum is awarded. The rules also
eliminate all exceptions to the rule that allowed cellular licensees to
restrict resale by competing with fully operational cellular licensees
in the same geographic market. The Commission successfully adopted a
Second Report and Order and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this
proceeding. The Second Report and Order extends the Commission's
cellular rules on manual roaming by any individual whose handset is
capable of accessing the network of a cellular, broadband PCS, or
covered SMR provider. The Third NPRM, among other things, sought
comment on whether the Commission should adopt rules requiring
cellular, broadband PCS, and covered SMR providers to provide automatic
roaming in their coverage areas, and whether both automatic and manual
roaming requirements should sunset five years after the initial grant
of PCS licenses. The Third MO&O generally affirmed the Commission's
earlier decision to extend the cellular resale rule to include certain
PCS and SMR providers and to sunset the rule until November 24, 2002.
However, it modified the prior decision by removing customer premise
equipment (CPE) and CPE in bundled packages from the scope of the
resale rule, by revising the scope of the resale rule to exclude all C,
D, E, and F block PCS licensees that do not own and control and are not
controlled by cellular or A or B block licensees, and by exempting from
the rule all SMR
[[Page 71485]]
and other CMRS providers that do not utilize in-network switching
facilities.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/13/94 59 FR 35664
NOI 07/13/94 59 FR 35664
NPRM Comment Period End 09/29/94
NPRM 04/04/95 60 FR 20949
NPRM Comment Period End 07/14/95
First R&O 07/12/96 61 FR 38399
Second R&O and Third NPRM 08/15/96 61 FR 44026
MO&O and O on Recon 11/09/99 64 FR 61022
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jane Phillips, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1310
RIN: 3060-AF58
_______________________________________________________________________
506. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT, COMPETITIVE BIDDING; 218-
219 MHZ COMPETITIVE BIDDING RULES
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC 309(j)
Abstract: Tenth Report and Order modifies the competitive bidding rules
for the upcoming auction of 218-219 MHz: (1) Eliminates bidding credits
available to women- and minority-owned 218-219 MHz applicants; (2)
extends two levels of bidding credits to small businesses based on a
two-tiered small business definition; (3) clarifies the attribution
rules for affiliates of 218-219 MHz applicants; and (4) increases the
amount of the upfront payments required to participate in the 218-219
MHz auction.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
R&O 04/25/94 59 FR 24947
FNPRM 08/06/96 61 FR 49103
R&O 11/15/96 61 FR 60198
FNPRM 09/30/98 63 FR 52215
MO&O 10/08/98 63 FR 54073
R&O and MO&O 11/03/99 64 FR 59656
Order on Recon 12/29/99 64 FR 72956
Second Order on Recon 02/07/01 66 FR 9212
Third Order on Recon of R&O and
MO&O 06/24/02 67 FR 42507
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: William Huber, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2109
Fax: 202 418-0890
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG00
_______________________________________________________________________
507. 39 GHZ CHANNEL PLAN
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 302; 47 USC 524
Abstract: This proceeding amends the FCC's rules to facilitate more
effective use of the 39 GHz band.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/26/96 61 FR 2465
NPRM Comment Period End 02/12/96
Order 02/22/96 61 FR 6809
Reply Comments 02/27/96
Order 05/01/96 61 FR 19236
Second NPRM 01/21/98 63 FR 3075
R&O 02/06/98 63 FR 6079
MO&O 08/23/99 64 FR 45891
NPRM 12/20/99 64 FR 71088
R&O 01/02/01 66 FR 33
NPRM 12/21/01 66 FR 65866
R&O 03/04/02 67 FR 9610
R&O 12/03/02 67 FR 71861
R&O 08/13/03 68 FR 48446
Third NPRM 08/27/04 69 FR 52632
Third NPRM Comment Period
Extended 10/04/04 69 FR 59166
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Ken Burnley, Staff Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0664
Email: [email protected]
Jennifer Burton, Attorney, Federal Communications Commission, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7581
RIN: 3060-AG16
_______________________________________________________________________
508. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT, AMENDMENT OF THE
COMMISSION'S RULES--BROADBAND PCS COMPETITIVE BIDDING AND THE COMMERCIAL
MOBILE RADIO SERVICE SPECTRUM CAP
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 301 and 302; 47 USC 303(r); 47
USC 309(j); 47 USC 332
Abstract: NPRM to modify the competitive bidding rules for the
Broadband PCS F Block. Report and Order, adopted June 21,1996, modified
the PCS/cellular rule and the cellular spectrum cap.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
O on Recon of Fifth MO&O and D,
E, & F R&O 11/15/00 65 FR 68927
Final Rule 03/02/01 66 FR 13022
Final Rule 06/04/01 66 FR 29911
Third NPRM 08/27/04 69 FR 52632
Third NPRM Comment Period
Extended 10/04/04 69 FR 59166
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Audrey Bashkin, Staff Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7535
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG21
_______________________________________________________________________
509. MULTIPLE ACCESS SYSTEMS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 302 to 303
Abstract: This proceeding amended the FCC's rules regarding multiple
address systems (MAS) in the microwave service. It streamlined
regulations and established a framework for MAS spectrum that provides
opportunities for continued development of competitive service
offerings by allowing a variety of services.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/19/97 62 FR 11407
Order 09/17/98 63 FR 53350
FNPRM 05/18/99 64 FR 38617
R&O 04/03/00 65 FR 17445
MO&O 07/03/01 66 FR 35107
Final Rule 07/22/04 69 FR 43772
Next Action Undetermined
[[Page 71486]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Shellie Blakeney, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0680
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG86
_______________________________________________________________________
510. AMENDMENT OF PART I OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES--COMPETITIVE BIDDING
PROCEDURES
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 202; 47 USC 303; 47 USC
309(j)
Abstract: This proceeding proposes to amend and modify the competitive
bidding rules for all auctionable services.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/21/97 62 FR 13570
NPRM Comment Period End 04/16/97
Second FNPRM 01/07/98 63 FR 770
Third R&O 01/15/98 63 FR 2315
Fifth R&O, Order on Recon 08/29/00 65 FR 52323
Fourth FNPRM 08/29/00 65 FR 52401
Seventh R&O 10/29/01 66 FR 54447
Eighth R&O 04/08/02 67 FR 16647
Second Order on Recon of Third
R&O and Order on Recon of Fifth
R&O 07/21/03 68 FR 42984
Final Rule 10/07/03 68 FR 57828
Final Rule 09/30/05 70 FR 57183
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: William Huber, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2109
Fax: 202 418-0890
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG87
_______________________________________________________________________
511. AMENDMENT OF PART 90 OF THE RULES TO ADOPT REGULATIONS FOR
AUTOMATIC VEHICLE MONITORING SYSTEMS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 251 and 252; 47 USC 303; 47 USC
309; 47 USC 332
Abstract: This Second Report and Order adopts rules and procedures
governing competitive bidding for multilateration Location and
Monitoring Service (LMS) frequencies.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/06/97 62 FR 52078
NPRM Comment Period End 11/20/97
Second R&O 07/30/98 63 FR 40659
NPRM 05/03/99 64 FR 23571
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Scot Stone, Federal Communications Commission, Wireless
Telecom Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0680
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH12
_______________________________________________________________________
512. FIXED SATELLITE SERVICE AND TERRESTRIAL SYSTEM IN THE KU-BAND
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 157; 47 USC 303
Abstract: The Memorandum Opinion and Order and 2nd Report and Order
addressed petitions for reconsideration and established technical,
service, and licensing rules for Multichannel Video Distribution and
Data Service (MVDDS) in the 12 GHz band. MVDDS will facilitate the
delivery of new communications services, such as video and broadband
services, to a wide range of populations, including those that are
unserved or underserved. These rules will allow MVDDS licensees to
share the 12 GHz band with new operators on a com-primary basis, and
non-harmful interference basis with incumbent Direct Broadcast
Satellite service providers.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/12/99 64 FR 1786
Order 02/16/99 64 FR 7577
Public Notice 12/15/99 64 FR 70028
FNPRM 01/24/01 66 FR 7607
R&O 02/16/01 66 FR 10601
Petitions for Recon 04/09/01 66 FR 18474
Second R&O 06/26/02 67 FR 43031
Third R&O 06/18/03 68 FR 42610
Order To Deny 07/25/03 68 FR 43942
Final Rule 05/18/04 69 FR 28062
Final Rule 06/07/04 69 FR 28062
Correcting Amendment 10/04/04 69 FR 59145
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jennifer Mock, Federal Communications Commission,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554
Phone: 202 418-1890
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH17
_______________________________________________________________________
513. SERVICE RULES FOR THE 746-764 AND 776-794 MHZ BANDS, AND REVISIONS
TO THE COMMISSION'S RULES
Legal Authority: 47 USC 1; 47 USC 4(i); 47 USC 7; 47 USC 10; 47 USC 201
and 202; 47 USC 208; 47 USC 214; 47 USC 301; 47 USC 303; 47 USC 307 and
308; 47 USC 309(j) and 309(k); 47 USC 310 and 311; 47 USC 315; 47 USC
317; 47 USC 324; 47 USC 331 and 332; 47 USC 336
Abstract: The Report and Order in this proceeding adopts service rules
for licensing and auction of commercial services in spectrum in the 700
MHz band to be vacated by UHF television licensees.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/07/99 64 FR 36686
R&O 01/20/00 65 FR 3139
Second R&O 04/04/00 65 FR 17594
MO&O and FNPRM 07/12/00 65 FR 42879
Second MO&O 02/06/01 66 FR 9035
Third R&O 02/14/01 66 FR 10204
Second MO&O 02/15/01 66 FR 10374
Order on Recon of Third R&O 10/10/01 66 FR 51594
Third MO&O and Order 07/30/02 67 FR 49244
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: William Huber, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2109
Fax: 202 418-0890
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH32
[[Page 71487]]
_______________________________________________________________________
514. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934 AS AMENDED
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC 309(j)
Abstract: In the Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order in WT Docket No.
99-87 (Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order), the Federal Communications
Commission (Commission or FCC) clarifies the Commission's Third Report
and Order in this docket, and takes the opportunity to correct the
inadvertent deletion of language in the rules regarding the schedule
for Private Land Mobile Radio systems in the 150-174 MHz and 421-512
MHz bands to transition to narrowband kHz technology.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/03/99 64 FR 23571
R&O 01/02/01 66 FR 33
MO&O 05/16/02 67 FR 34848
NPRM 07/17/03 68 FR 42337
R&O 07/17/03 68 FR 42296
Order 04/06/04 69 FR 17959
Final Rule 06/15/05 70 FR 34666
NPRM 06/15/05 70 FR 34726
Final Rule 05/11/05 70 FR 24712
Final Rule 07/15/05 70 FR 41631
Final Rule 04/18/07 72 FR 19387
Fourth MO&O 06/17/08 73 FR 34201
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Roberto Mussenden, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1428
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH33
_______________________________________________________________________
515. AMENDMENT OF THE RULES TO LICENSE FIXED SERVICES AT 24 GHZ
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 303; 47 USC 309(j)
Abstract: This rulemaking proposes licensing and service rules to
govern the 24 GHz band generally.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/20/99 64 FR 71088
R&O 08/05/00 65 FR 59350
Order 06/01/01 66 FR 29722
NPRM 12/21/01 66 FR 65866
Final Rule 07/27/04 69 FR 44608
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Nese Guendelsberger, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0634
Fax: 202 418-1186
Email: [email protected]
Nancy Zaczek, Attorney, Federal Communications Commission, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0680
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH41
_______________________________________________________________________
516. AMENDMENT OF GOVERNING MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 302 to 303
Abstract: This matter concerns the amendment of the rules governing
maritime communications in order to consolidate, revise and streamline
the regulations as well as address new international requirements and
improve the operational ability of all users of marine radios.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/24/00 65 FR 21694
NPRM 08/17/00 65 FR 50173
NPRM 05/17/02 67 FR 35086
Report & Order 08/07/03 68 FR 46957
Second R&O, Sixth R&O, Second
FNPRM 04/06/04 69 FR 18007
Comments Due 06/07/04
Reply Comments Due 07/06/04
Second R&O and Sixth R&O 11/08/04 69 FR 64664
NPRM 11/08/06 71 FR 65447
Final Action 01/25/08 73 FR 4475
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jeff Tobias, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0680
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH55
_______________________________________________________________________
517. COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCEDURES
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 301 to 303; 47 USC 309; 47 USC 332
Abstract: This proceeding proposes resumption of installment payments
for broadband Personal Communications Services (PCS), e.g., for C and F
Block, with payment deadline to be reinstated as of March 31, 1998. The
proposal contemplates, inter alia, changes to the FCC's C Block rules
to govern re-auction of surrendered spectrum in the C Block. The
proposal was released on October 16, 1997, and published in the Federal
Register.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Second R&O 10/24/97 62 FR 55348
FNPRM 10/24/97 62 FR 55375
Order on Recon of Second R&O 04/08/98 63 FR 17111
Fourth R&O 09/23/98 63 FR 50791
Second Order on Recon of Second
R&O 05/18/99 64 FR 26887
Recon of Fourth R&O 03/16/00 65 FR 14213
FNPRM 06/13/00 65 FR 37092
Sixth R&O and Order on Recon 09/05/00 65 FR 53620
Order on Recon 02/12/01 66 FR 9773
Seventh R&O 10/29/01 66 FR 54447
Eighth R&O 04/08/02 67 FR 16647
Final Rule 07/21/03 68 FR 42984
Final Rule 10/07/03 68 FR 57828
Final Rule 09/30/05 70 FR 57183
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Audrey Bashkin, Staff Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7535
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH57
_______________________________________________________________________
518. 2000 BIENNIAL REGULATORY REVIEW SPECTRUM AGGREGATION LIMITS FOR
COMMERCIAL MOBILE RADIO SERVICES
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 161; 47 USC 303(g);
47 USC 303(r)
Abstract: The Commission has adopted a final rule in a proceeding
reexamining the need for Commercial Mobile Radio Services spectrum
aggregation limits.
[[Page 71488]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/12/01 66 FR 9798
NPRM Comment Period End 05/14/01
Final Rule 01/14/02 67 FR 1626
Correction to Final Rule 01/31/02 67 FR 4675
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Michael J. Rowan, Attorney-Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1883
Fax: 202 418-7447
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH81
_______________________________________________________________________
519. IN THE MATTER OF PROMOTING EFFICIENT USE OF SPECTRUM THROUGH
ELIMINATION OF BARRIERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECONDARY MARKETS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 157; 47 USC 160; 47
USC 201 and 202; 47 USC 208; 47 USC 214; 47 USC 301; 47 USC 303; 47 USC
308 to 310
Abstract: The Commission has opened a proceeding to examine actions it
may take to remove unnecessary regulatory barriers to the development
of more robust secondary markets in radio spectrum usage rights.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/26/00 65 FR 81475
NPRM Comment Period End 01/29/01 66 FR 8149
New NPRM Comment Period End 02/09/01
NPRM 11/25/03 68 FR 66232
Final Rule 11/25/03 68 FR 66252
NPRM Comment Period End 01/05/04
Final Rule 02/12/04 69 FR 6920
Final Rule 02/25/04 69 FR 8569
Final Rule 11/15/04 69 FR 65544
Final Rule 12/27/04 69 FR 77522
Proposed Rule 12/27/04 69 FR 77560
Final Rule 08/01/07 72 FR 41935
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Paul Murray, Staff Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0688
Fax: 202 418-7447
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH82
_______________________________________________________________________
520. REEXAMINATION OF ROAMING OBLIGATIONS OF COMMERCIAL MOBILE RADIO
SERVICE PROVIDERS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 152(n); 47 USC 154(i) and 154(j);
47 USC 201(b); 47 USC 251(a); 47 USC 253; 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC
332(c)(1)(B); 47 USC 309
Abstract: This rulemaking considers whether the Commission should adopt
an automatic roaming rule for Commercial Mobile Radio Services and
sunset the current manual roaming requirement.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/21/00 65 FR 69891
NPRM 09/28/05 70 FR 56612
NPRM 01/19/06 71 FR 3029
FNPRM 08/30/07 72 FR 50085
Final Rule 08/30/07 72 FR 50064
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Christina Clearwater, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecom. Bureau, Auctions Division, 445 12th
Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1893
Email: [email protected]
Won Kim, Attorney, Federal Communications Commission, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1368
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH83
_______________________________________________________________________
521. AMENDMENT TO LICENSING LOW POWER OPERATIONS IN 450-470 MHZ BAND
Legal Authority: 47 USC 1; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 302 and 303; 47 USC 332
Abstract: The proposed amendments facilitate the viability of low power
operations in the private land mobile radio 450-470 MHz Band.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 09/12/01 66 FR 47435
R&O 04/21/03 68 FR 19444
Final Rule 09/25/03 68 FR 55319
Final Rule 10/12/04 69 FR 60561
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Scot Stone, Federal Communications Commission, Wireless
Telecom Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0680
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH84
_______________________________________________________________________
522. REVIEW OF QUIET ZONES APPLICATION PROCEDURES
Legal Authority: 47 USC 1; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 161; 47 USC 303(g); 47
USC 303(r)
Abstract: Review of Quiet Zones rules for possible streamlining while
ensuring adequate protection from interference.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/21/01 66 FR 65866
NPRM Comment Period End 02/06/02
R&O 04/06/04 69 FR 17946
Final Rule 09/23/04 69 FR 56956
Final Rule 12/06/04 69 FR 70378
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Linda Chang, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1339
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH88
_______________________________________________________________________
523. REALLOCATION AND SERVICE RULES FOR THE 698-746 MHZ SPECTRUM BAND
(TELEVISION CHANNELS 52-59)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151 and 152; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 155(c); 47
USC 157; 47 USC 201 and 202; 47 USC 208; 47 USC 214; 47 USC 301 to
302(g); 47 USC 303; 47 USC 307; 47 USC 309 to 311; 47 USC 314; 47 USC
316; 47 USC 319; 47 USC 324; 47 USC 331 to 333; 47 USC 336; 47 USC 534
and 535
Abstract: The Commission has adopted allocation and service rules for
the 48 MHz of spectrum in the 698-746 MHz
[[Page 71489]]
band currently occupied by television channels 52-59.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/13/01 66 FR 19106
R&O 02/06/02 67 FR 5491
MO&O 07/09/02 67 FR 45380
Final Rule 08/28/04 69 FR 51706
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Michael J. Rowan, Attorney-Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1883
Fax: 202 418-7447
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH89
_______________________________________________________________________
524. YEAR 2000 BIENNIAL REVIEW (WT DOCKET NO. 01-108)
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
Abstract: The year 2000 part 22 Biennial Review Report and Order and
subsequent Order on Reconsideration examined whether certain rules
should be modified or eliminated as a result of technological changes
or increased competition.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Rule 04/01/04 69 FR 17063
Final Rule Effective 06/01/04
Final Rule 09/15/04 69 FR 55516
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Linda Chang, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1339
Fax: 202 418-7447
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI26
_______________________________________________________________________
525. AIR-GROUND TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 151(i); 47 USC 161; 47 USC 303(r)
Abstract: Re-examination of rules governing air-ground
telecommunications services on commercial airplanes. Revision/
elimination of 47 CFR 22 non-cellular provisions.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 07/25/03 68 FR 44003
NPRM Comment Period End 10/23/03
Final Rule 04/13/05 70 FR 19293
NPRM 04/13/05 70 FR 19377
Final Rule Correction 04/27/05 70 FR 21663
Final Rule 12/27/05 70 FR 76411
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Richard Arsenault, Chief Counsel, Mobility Division,
WTB, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0920
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI27
_______________________________________________________________________
526. AMENDMENTS OF VARIOUS RULES AFFECTING WIRELESS RADIO SERVICES (WT
DOCKET NO. 03-264)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 161; 47 USC 303(r)
Abstract: This rulemaking proposes to streamline and harmonize wireless
radio service rules.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 02/23/04 69 FR 8132
NPRM Comment Period End 05/24/04
NPRM 10/19/05 70 FR 60770
Final Rule 10/20/05 70 FR 61049
Proposed Rule 05/02/07 72 FR 24238
Final Rule 05/16/07 72 FR 27688
Final Rule 08/24/07 72 FR 48814
Final Rule 05/02/08 73 FR 24180
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Nina Shafran, Federal Communications Commission, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2781
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI30
_______________________________________________________________________
527. FACILITATING THE PROVISION OF SPECTRUM-BASED SERVICES TO RURAL
AREAS
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
Abstract: This rulemaking will facilitate the provision of spectrum-
based services to rural areas.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/12/03 68 FR 64050
NPRM Comment Period End 01/26/04
NPRM 12/15/04 69 FR 75174
Final Rule 12/15/04 69 FR 75144
Final Rule 04/27/05 70 FR 21652
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Allen A. Barna, Federal Communications Commission, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0620
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI31
_______________________________________________________________________
528. EXTENDING WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES TO TRIBAL LANDS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC
309(j); . . .
Abstract: This action amends rules to encourage carriers to provide
telecommunications services to tribal lands.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Final Rule 05/02/03 68 FR 23417
Final Rule Effective 07/01/03
Final Rule 10/18/04 69 FR 61317
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Michael Connelly, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th
Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0132
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI32
_______________________________________________________________________
529. AMENDMENT OF COMMISSION RULES CONCERNING AIRPORT TERMINAL USE
FREQUENCIES 450-470 MHZ BAND OF THE PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES
(WT DOCKET NO. 02-318)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303(g); 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC
332(c)(7)
Abstract: The Commission seeks comment on revisions to the use of
Airport Terminal Use (ATU)
[[Page 71490]]
frequencies in the 45-470 Private Land Mobile Radio Industrial Business
Pool.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/21/02 67 FR 70196
NPRM Comment Period End 01/06/03
Final Rule 03/24/05 70 FR 15005
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: John Evanoff, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, 445 12th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0848
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI33
_______________________________________________________________________
530. IMPROVING PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS IN THE 800 MHZ BAND
INDUSTRIAL/LAND TRANSPORTATION AND BUSINESS CHANNELS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i); 47 USC 303(f); 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC
332
Abstract: The Commission seeks to improve public safety communications
in the 800 MHz band and consolidate the 800 MHz Industrial/Land
Transportation and Business Pool channels.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/05/02 67 FR 16351
Final Rule 08/19/02 67 FR 53754
Proposed Rule 02/10/03 68 FR 6687
Final Rule 11/22/04 69 FR 67823
Final Rule 11/22/04 69 FR 67853
Final Rule 02/08/05 70 FR 6750
Final Rule 02/08/05 70 FR 6761
Final Rule 04/06/05 70 FR 17327
Notice 06/15/05 70 FR 34764
Final Rule 09/28/05 70 FR 56583
Notice 10/26/05 70 FR 61823
Final Rule 12/28/05 70 FR 76704
Proposed Rule 09/21/06 71 FR 55149
Clarification 06/20/07 72 FR 33914
Final Rule 07/20/07 72 FR 39756
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Michael Wilhelm, Federal Communications Commission, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0870
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI34
_______________________________________________________________________
531. REVIEW OF PART 87 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES CONCERNING AVIATION (WT
DOCKET NO. 01-289)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 303; 47 USC 307(e)
Abstract: This proceeding is intended to streamline, consolidate and
revise our part 87 rules governing the Aviation Radio Service. The rule
changes are designed to ensure these rules reflect current
technological advances.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/16/01 66 FR 64785
R&O and FNPRM 10/16/03
FNPRM 04/12/04 69 FR 19140
R&O 06/14/04 69 FR 32577
NPRM 12/06/06 71 FR 70710
Final Rule 12/06/06 71 FR 70671
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Jeff Tobias, Attorney Advisor, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0680
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI35
_______________________________________________________________________
532. HEARING AID-COMPATIBLE TELEPHONES (WT DOCKET NOS. 01-309 & 06-150)
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 160; 47 USC 251 to 254; 47 USC 303;
47 USC 332
Abstract: This item modifies exemptions for wireless phones under the
Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988 (HAC Act) to require that digital
wireless phones be capable of being effectively used with hearing aids.
It finds that modifying the exemption will extend the benefits of
wireless telecommunications to individuals with hearing disabilities--
including emergency, business, and social communications--thereby
increasing the value of the wireless network for all Americans.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/23/01 66 FR 58703
R&O 09/16/03 68 FR 54173
Notice 11/14/03 68 FR 64625
NPRM 07/27/05 70 FR 43386
Final Rule 07/27/05 70 FR 43323
NPRM 08/21/06 71 FR 48506
NPRM Comment Period End 09/20/06
NPRM 09/26/06 71 FR 57455
Proposed Rule 05/02/07 72 FR 24236
Final Rule 05/16/07 72 FR 27688
Final Rule 08/24/07 72 FR 48814
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Andra Cunningham, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1630
Fax: 202 428-2227
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI57
_______________________________________________________________________
533. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMERCIAL SPECTRUM ENHANCEMENT ACT (CSEA)
AND MODERNIZATION OF THE COMMISSION'S COMPETITIVE BIDDING RULES AND
PROCEDURES (WT DOCKET NO. 05-211)
Legal Authority: 15 USC 79; 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i)-(j); 47 USC 155;
47 USC 155(c); 47 USC 157; 47 USC 225; 47 USC 303(r); 47 USC 307; 47
USC 309; 47 USC 309(j); 47 USC 325(e); 47 USC 334; 47 USC 336; 47 USC
339; 47 USC 554
Abstract: This proceeding implements rules and procedures needed to
comply with the recently enacted Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act
(CSEA). It establishes a mechanism for reimbursing federal agencies out
of spectrum auction proceeds for the cost of relocating their
operations from certain ``eligible frequencies'' that have been
reallocated from Federal to non-Federal use. It also seeks to improve
the Commission's ability to achieve Congress's directives with regard
to designated entities and to ensure that, in accordance with the
intent of Congress, every recipient of its designated entity benefits
is an entity that uses its licenses to directly provide facilities-
based telecommunications services for the benefit of the public.
[[Page 71491]]
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/14/05 70 FR 43372
Declaratory Ruling 06/14/05 70 FR 43322
R&O 01/24/06 71 FR 6214
FNPRM 02/03/06 71 FR 6992
Second R&O 04/25/06 71 FR 26245
Order on Recon of Second R&O 06/02/06 71 FR 34272
Order on Recon of Second R&O 06/02/06 71 FR 34272
Comment Period End 09/20/06
Reply Comment Period End 10/20/06
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Kelly Quinn, Asst. Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access
Division, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7384
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI88
_______________________________________________________________________
534. FACILITATING THE PROVISION OF FIXED AND MOBILE
BROADBAND ACCESS EDUCATIONAL AND OTHER ADVANCED SERVICES IN THE 2150-
2162 AND 2500-2690 MHZ BANDS; REVIEWING OF THE SPECTRUM SHARING PLAN
AMONG NON-GEOST
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154; 47 USC 301 to 303; 47 USC 307 ; 47 USC
309; 47 USC 332; 47 USC 336 and 337
Abstract: The Commission seeks comment on whether to assign Educational
Broadband Service (EBS) spectrum in the Gulf of Mexico. It also seeks
comment on how to license unassigned and available EBS spectrum.
Specifically, we seek comment on whether it would be in the public
interest to develop a scheme for licensing unassigned EBS spectrum that
avoids mutual exclusivity; we ask whether EBS eligible entities could
participate fully in a spectrum auction; we seek comment on the use of
small business size standards and bidding credits for EBS if we adopt a
licensing scheme that could result in mutually exclusive applications;
we seek comment on the proper market size and size of spectrum blocks
for new EBS licenses; and we seek comment on issuing one license to a
State agency designated by the Governor to be the spectrum manager,
using frequency coordinators to avoid mutually exclusive EBS
applications, as well as other alternative licensing schemes. The
Commission must develop a new licensing scheme for EBS in order to
achieve the Commission's goal of facilitating the development of new
and innovative wireless services for the benefit of students throughout
the nation.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/02/03 68 FR 34560
FNPRM 07/29/04 69 FR 72048
R&O 07/29/04 69 FR 72020
MO&O 04/27/06 71 FR 35178
Further NPRM 03/20/08 73 FR 26067
MO&O 03/20/08 73 FR 26032
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: John Schauble, Deputy Chief, Broadband Division, WTB,
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC
20554
Phone: 202 418-0797
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AJ12
_______________________________________________________________________
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Long-Term Actions
Wireline Competition Bureau
_______________________________________________________________________
535. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE PORTIONS OF THE 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151 et seq
Abstract: As required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the
Commission sought comment on proposals for reforming universal service.
On November 8, 1996, the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service
issued a recommended decision on changes to the universal service
support mechanisms. In addition, on January 10, 1997, the Commission
issued an NPRM and NOI on changes to the Board of Directors of the
National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA), regarding the
administration of universal service. On May 8, 1997, the Commission, at
the direction of Congress, released its order implementing the
universal service portions of the 1996 Act. On December 30, 1997, the
Commission issued the Fourth Order on Reconsideration which made
changes and clarifications to the May 8 Order. On June 22, 1998, the
Commission issued the Fifth Order on Reconsideration which revised the
collection levels for the schools and libraries support mechanism
through June 30, 1999, and revised the collection levels for the rural
health care support mechanism through December 31, 1998. The Fifth
Order on Reconsideration also revised the priority with which schools
and libraries and rural health care providers will receive support. On
October 28, 1998, the Commission issued the Fifth Report and Order, in
which it adopted the model platform for its forward-looking economic
cost methodology, which will be used to determine support for non-rural
carriers beginning July 1, 1999. On November 21, 1998, the Commission
issued the 8th Order on Reconsideration in which it consolidated the
administration of universal service into a single entity known as the
Universal Service Administrative Company or USAC. On November 25, 1998,
the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service issued its Second
Recommended Decision in which the Joint Board made certain
recommendations to the Commission regarding the high-cost support
mechanism.
On May 28, 1999, the Commission issued the Thirteenth Order on
Reconsideration in which it adopted the principles of a Federal high-
cost support mechanism that conformed to the Second Recommended
Decision and in which it sought further comment on specific elements of
the support methodology. In the Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration,
the Commission also decided to implement the new high-cost support
mechanism on January 1, 2000, instead of July 1,
[[Page 71492]]
1999, as previously planned. On May 28, 1999, the Commission also
issued a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in which it sought
comment on proposed input values to be used in the forward-looking
model to determine non-rural LECs' cost of providing supported services
in high cost areas. On August 5, 1999, the Commission adopted a Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in which it sought comment to ascertain
the availability of, and to understand the possible impediments to,
deployment and subscribership in unserved and underserved areas of the
Nation, including tribal lands and other insular areas.
On November 1, 1999, the Commission issued the Fourteenth Order on
Reconsideration, in which it eliminated the requirement that only
carriers that have been certified as eligible telecommunications
carriers may receive credit against their universal service
contributions for providing telecommunications services to rural health
care providers at the lower urban rates. On November 1, 1999, the
Commission also issued the Fifteenth Order on Reconsideration, in which
it authorized support for any commercially available telecommunications
service regardless of the bandwidth, and simplified the method for
determining how much support a rural health care provider can receive.
On November 2, 1999, the Commission issued the Ninth Report and Order
and Eighteenth Order on Reconsideration in which it adopted a new
forward-looking high-cost support mechanism that will enable States to
ensure the reasonable comparability of non-rural carriers' intrastate
rates. On November 2, 1999, the Commission also issuedthe Tenth Report
and Order in which it completed the selection of a cost model to
estimate forward-looking cost by adopting input values for the
previously adopted cost model.
On June 30, 2000, the Commission issued the Twelfth Report and Order,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, and Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, in response to the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking it
adopted on August 5, 1999. In the Twelfth Report and Order, the
Commission adopted measures to promote telecommunications
subscribership and infrastructure deployment within American Indian and
Alaska Native tribal communities.
On October 12, 2000, the Commission released a Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking and Order to seek comment on proposals to modify
the Commission's rules relating to contributions to the Federal
universal service support mechanisms. On January 12, 2001, the
Commission released a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking
comment on the Recommended Decision of the Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service (Joint Board) regarding a plan for reforming the
universal service support mechanism for rural carriers. The Joint Board
sent to the Commission the Rural Task Force Recommendation as a good
foundation for implementing rural high-cost reform. The Rural Task
Force recommends the use of a modified version of the current high-cost
loop support mechanism based on carriers' embedded costs.
On May 23, 2001, the Commission released the Fourteenth Report and
Order, Twenty-Second Order on Reconsideration and Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking. In the Fourteenth Report and Order, the Commission
adopted a 5-year plan that makes modifications to the high-cost loop
support mechanism for rural carriers. These modifications were based on
the recommendation of the Joint Board and will provide predictable
levels of support so that rural carriers can continue to provide
affordable service in rural America, while ensuring that consumers in
all areas of the nation, including rural areas, have access to
affordable and quality telecommunications services.
On March 14, 2001, the Commission issued an order modifying the
methodology used to assess contributions to universal service. The
methodology was modified to reduce the interval between the accrual of
revenues and the assessment of contributions based on those revenues.
The order reduced the interval from an average of one year to an
average of six months.
On May 8, 2001, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
which sought comment on how to streamline and reform both the manner in
which the Commission assesses carrier contributions to the universal
service fund and the manner in which carriers may recover those costs
from their customers.
On May 22, 2001, the Commission adopted a 5-year interim freeze of the
part 36 jurisdictional separations rules, pending comprehensive reform
of the separations process. The 5-year interim freeze was based upon
the July 21, 2000, Recommended Decision of the Federal-State Joint
Board on Separations. Under the interim freeze, the part 36 categories
and jurisdictional allocation factors of price cap incumbent LECs are
frozen, while rate-of-return carriers had the option to freeze only
their jurisdictional allocation factors. The interim freeze is in
effect from July 1, 2001, to June 30, 2006, or until comprehensive
reform is completed, whichever comes first.
On November 8, 2001, the Commission released the Fifteenth Report and
Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Further Notice)
reforming the interstate access charge and universal service support
system for rate-of-return incumbent carriers. The Order established a
new interstate support mechanism to replace implicit support in the
interstate access rate structure of rate-of-return carriers with
explicit, portable support. Among other things, the Further Notice
sought comment on consolidating the existing Long Term Support
mechanism with the new support mechanism created in the Order.
On January 25, 2002, the Commission released a Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking and Order (Further Notice), in which it sought
comment on modifications to the rules governing the schools and
libraries support mechanism. The modifications address changes that
would make the program more efficient, ensure that the benefits of the
program are distributed in an equitable manner, and prevent waste,
fraud, and abuse. In addition, the order denied certain petitions for
reconsideration relating to unused funds.
On February 15, 2002, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking and Order, in which it sought comment on the issues from the
Ninth Report and Order remanded by the United States Court of Appeals
for the Tenth Circuit. The Ninth Report and Order established a Federal
high-cost universal service support mechanism for non-rural carriers
based on forward-looking economic costs. In addition, the order
referred these issues to the Federal-State Joint Board on
[[Page 71493]]
Universal Service for a recommended decision.
On February 15, 2002, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking examining the appropriate legal and policy framework under
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, for broadband access to the
Internet provided over domestic wireline facilities.
On February 26, 2002, the Commission issued a Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking and Report and Order, in which it sought comment on
specific proposals to change the manner in which universal service
contributions are assessed and recovered, including one proposal to
assess contributions based on the number and capacity of connections
provided to a public network. This proceeding also made certain
modifications to the existing contribution system.
On April 19, 2002, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking in which it sought comment on specific proposals to: clarify
how it should treat eligible entities that also perform functions that
are outside the statutory definition of ``health care provider;''
provide support for Internet access; and change the calculation of
discounted services, including the calculation of urban and rural
rates.
On December 13, 2002, the Commission issued an Order and Second FNPRM
in which it sought further comment on three specific connection-based
universal service contribution methodologies. This Order also made
interim changes to the contribution methodology to ensure the viability
of the fund in the near term.
On February 25, 2003, the Commission issued an NPRM in which it sought
comment on the Recommended Decision issued by the Federal-State Joint
Board on Universal Service regarding the definition of services
supported by universal service.
On February 26, 2003, the Commission issued a Public Notice in which it
sought comment on a staff study of several alternative universal
service contribution methodologies.
On April 30, 2003, the Commission issued a Second Report & Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, in which it simplified and
streamlined the operation of the schools and libraries support
mechanism. In addition, it sought comment on further proposals to
refine the support mechanism, including the carry-forward of unused
funds.
On May 21, 2003, the Commission issued a Twenty-fifth Order on
Reconsideration, Report and Order, and Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, in which it resolved several petitions for reconsideration
of the Twelfth Report and Order. In addition, it sought further comment
on ways to provide enhanced Lifeline support to near reservation areas.
On June 9, 2003, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, in which it sought comment on changes to the low-income
support mechanisms recommended by the Joint Board.
On July 3, 2003, the Commission released an Order eliminating the
requirement that the National Exchange Carrier Association hold annual
elections for its board of directors and that its directors serve one-
year terms.
On July 14, 2003, the Commission released an Order and Order on
Reconsideration adopting the Joint Board's recommendations regarding
the services supported by universal service.
On July 24, 2003, the Commission released an Order adopting measures to
ensure that implementation of the Children's Internet Protection Act
complies with a US Supreme Court decision. 68 FR 47453.
On October 27, 2003, the Commission released an Order on Remand,
Memorandum Opinion and Order, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
modifying the High-Cost mechanism for non-rural carriers and seeking
comment on certain issues relating to rate review and an expanded
certification process. Order: 68 FR 69622. FNPRM: 68 FR 69641.
On November 17, 2003, the Commission released a Report and Order, Order
on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking improving
the Rural Healthcare Support mechanism and seeking comment on
modifications to the definition of ``rural area'' for the Rural
Healthcare Support mechanism. 68 FR 74492.
On December 23, 2003, the Commission released the Third Report and
Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking adopting rules
to limit waste, fraud and abuse in the Schools and Libraries mechanism
and seeking comment on additional measures to limit waste, fraud, and
abuse. Order: 69 FR 6181. FNPRM: 69 FR 6229.
On February 26, 2004, the Commission released a Report and Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking modifying regulation of rate-of-
return carriers and seeking comment on further changes to regulation of
rate-of-return carriers. 69 FR 13794.
On April 29, 2004, the Commission released a Report and Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking improving the effectiveness of
the low-income mechanism and seeking comment on whether the Commission
should add an income-based criterion of 150 percent of the Federal
Poverty Guidelines.
On May 14, 2004, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
that sought comment on various abbreviated dialing arrangements that
could be used by state ``One Call'' notification systems in compliance
with the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002.
On June 8, 2004, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
that sought comment on the Recommended Decision of the Joint Board on
Universal Service concerning the process for designation of eligible
telecommunications carriers (ETCs) and the Commission's rules regarding
high-cost universal service support.
On June 28, 2004, the Commission issued an Order that asked the Joint
Board to review the Commission's rules relating to the high-cost
universal service support mechanism for rural carriers and to determine
the appropriate rural mechanism to succeed the 5-year plan adopted in
the Rural Task Force Order.
On June 30, 2004, the Commission issued an Order appointing the
Honorable Robert Nelson, Commissioner of the Michigan Public Service
Commission to serve on the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service.
On July 20, 2004, the Commission issued an Order that granted, in part,
waiver requests filed by AT&T, SBC and Verizon regarding the true-up
process for universal service contributions based on 2003 revenues.
On July 30, 2004, the Commission issued an Order on Reconsideration
[[Page 71494]]
and Fourth Report and Order that addressed Petitions for
Reconsideration of the Commitment Adjustment Order, which directed the
Universal Service Administrative Company to cancel any E-rate funding
commitments that were made in violation of the Telecommunications Act
of 1996 and to recover any erroneously distributed funds from service
providers.
On August 13, 2004, the Commission issued a Fifth Report and Order and
Order that adopted measures to protect against waste, fraud and abuse
in the administration of the Schools and Libraries Universal Service
Support Mechanism. The document also resolved a number of issues that
have arisen from audit activities conducted as part of ongoing
oversight over the administration of the universal service fund (USF)
and addressed programmatic concerns raised by the Office of Inspector
General.
On August 26, 2004, the Commission issued an Order that granted in part
NeuStar's Request to perform certain changes and transactions that do
not affect its neutrality without Commission approval.
On September 9, 2004, the Commission issued a Fourth Report to Congress
that concluded the Commission's Fourth inquiry under section 706 of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996. It concludes that the overall goal of
section 706 is being met, and that advanced telecommunications
capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and
timely fashion.
On September 16, 2004, the Commission issued a Second Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking that sought comment on the North American Numbering
Council recommendation for reducing the time interval for intermodal
porting. The Commission also sought comment on implementation issues in
the event that a reduced intermodal porting interval is adopted.
On September 27, 2004, the Commission issued a Memorandum Opinion and
Order that dismissed as moot Accipiter's Application for Review of a
decision by the Accounting and Audits Division made on delegated
authority, denying Accipiter's request for waiver of 47 CFR sections
36.611 and 36.612.
On October 29, 2004, the Commission issued a Memorandum Opinion and
Order that granted the Application for Review of a decision by the
Common Carrier Bureau made on delegated authority, which granted
Sandwich Isles a waiver to be treated as an incumbent Local Exchange
Carrier serving a previously unserved area for purposes of receiving
high-cost universal service support.
On October 29, 2004, the Commission issued an Order that denied a
petition for reconsideration filed by Business Service Center, Inc.,
Mobile Phone of Texas, Inc., and 3 Rivers PCS, Inc. requesting that the
Commission reconsider its ``safe harbor'' guidelines, adopted in 1998,
which allow several categories of carriers to assume that a certain
percentage of their telecommunications revenues is interstate for
universal service reporting and contribution purposes.
On November 29, 2004, the Commission issued an Order on Reconsideration
that addressed twelve petitions for reconsideration of the Universal
Service First Report and Order and the Fourth Order on Reconsideration.
These petitions concerned, among other issues, the high-cost and
Schools and Libraries mechanisms, and contribution methodology.
On December 17, 2004, the Commission issued a Second Report and Order,
Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
that modified its rules to improve the effectiveness of the rural
health care universal service support mechanism.
On December 30, 2004, the Commission issued an Order that approved the
nominations of two state commissioners, Elliott Smith and Ray Baum to
the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service.
On January 10, 2005, the Commission issued an Order and Order on
Reconsideration that amended 47 CFR section 54.305 so that it does not
apply to transfers to exchanges between non-rural carriers after the
phase-down of interim hold-harmless support, and granted a request by
the National Telephone Cooperative Association to provide that rural
carriers may receive ``safety valve'' support for investment made in
the first year of operating acquired exchanges.
On January 10, 2005, the Commission issued an Order that denied in part
and granted in part a request by Valor for waiver of 47 CFR section
54.305. The waiver allowed it to receive additional safety valve
support consistent with the modifications to the safety valve mechanism
contained in the CompanionOrder.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Recommended Decision Federal-
State Joint Board, Universal
Service 11/08/96 61 FR 63778
First R&O 05/08/97 62 FR 32862
Second R&O 05/08/97 62 FR 32862
Order on Recon 07/10/97 62 FR 40742
R&O and Second Order on Recon 07/18/97 62 FR 41294
Second R&O, and FNPRM 08/15/97 62 FR 47404
Third R&O 10/14/97 62 FR 56118
Second Order on Recon 11/26/97 62 FR 65036
Fourth Order on Recon 12/30/97 62 FR 2093
Fifth Order on Recon 06/22/98 63 FR 43088
Fifth R&O 10/28/98 63 FR 63993
Eighth Order on Recon 11/21/98
Second Recommended Decision 11/25/98 63 FR 67837
Thirteenth Order on Recon 06/09/99 64 FR 30917
FNPRM 06/14/99 64 FR 31780
FNPRM 09/30/99 64 FR 52738
Fourteenth Order on Recon 11/16/99 64 FR 62120
Fifteenth Order on Recon 11/30/99 64 FR 66778
Tenth R&O 12/01/99 64 FR 67372
Ninth R&O and Eighteenth Order
on Recon 12/01/99 64 FR 67416
Nineteenth Order on Recon 12/30/99 64 FR 73427
Twentieth Order on Recon 05/08/00 65 FR 26513
Public Notice 07/18/00 65 FR 44507
Twelfth R&O, MO&O and FNPRM 08/04/00 65 FR 47883
FNPRM and Order 11/09/00 65 FR 67322
FNPRM 01/26/01 66 FR 7867
R&O and Order on Recon 03/14/01 66 FR 16144
NPRM 05/08/01 66 FR 28718
Order 05/22/01 66 FR 35107
Fourteenth R&O and FNPRM 05/23/01 66 FR 30080
FNPRM and Order 01/25/02 67 FR 7327
NPRM 02/15/02 67 FR 9232
NPRM and Order 02/15/02 67 FR 10846
[[Page 71495]]
FNPRM and R&O 02/26/02 67 FR 11254
NPRM 04/19/02 67 FR 34653
Order and Second FNPRM 12/13/02 67 FR 79543
NPRM 02/25/03 68 FR 12020
Public Notice 02/26/03 68 FR 10724
Second R&O and FNPRM 06/20/03 68 FR 36961
Twenty-Fifth Order on Recon,
R&O, Order, and FNPRM 07/16/03 68 FR 41996
NPRM 07/17/03 68 FR 42333
Order 07/24/03 68 FR 47453
Order 08/06/03 68 FR 46500
Order and Order on Recon 08/19/03 68 FR 49707
Order on Remand, MO&O, FNPRM 10/27/03 68 FR 69641
R&O, Order on Recon, FNPRM 11/17/03 68 FR 74492
R&O, FNPRM 02/26/04 69 FR 13794
R&O, FNPRM 04/29/04
NPRM 05/14/04 69 FR 3130
NPRM 06/08/04 69 FR 40839
Order 06/28/04 69 FR 48232
Order on Recon & Fourth R&O 07/30/04 69 FR 55983
Fifth R&O and Order 08/13/04 69 FR 55097
Order 08/26/04 69 FR 57289
Second FNPRM 09/16/04 69 FR 61334
Order & Order on Recon 01/10/05 70 FR 10057
Sixth R&O 03/14/05 70 FR 19321
R&O 03/17/05 70 FR 29960
MO&O 03/30/05 70 FR 21779
NPRM & FNPRM 06/14/05 70 FR 41658
Order 10/14/05 70 FR 65850
Order 10/27/05
NPRM 01/11/06 71 FR 1721
Report Number 2747 01/12/06 71 FR 2042
Order 02/08/06 71 FR 6485
FNPRM 03/15/06 71 FR 13393
R&O and NPRM 07/10/06 71 FR 38781
Order 01/01/06 71 FR 6485
Order 05/16/06 71 FR 30298
MO&O and FNPRM 05/16/06 71 FR 29843
R&O 06/27/06 71 FR 38781
Public Notice 08/11/06 71 FR 50420
Order 09/29/06 71 FR 65517
Public Notice 03/12/07 72 FR 36706
Public Notice 03/13/07 72 FR 40816
Public Notice 03/16/07 72 FR 39421
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Adrian Wright, Telecommunications Policy Analyst,
Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0792
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AF85
_______________________________________________________________________
536. TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS' USE OF CUSTOMER PROPRIETARY NETWORK
INFORMATION AND OTHER CUSTOMER INFORMATION
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 222; 47 USC 272; 47 USC
303(r)
Abstract: The Commission adopted rules implementing the new statutory
framework governing carrier use and disclosure of customer proprietary
network information (CPNI) created by section 222 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended. CPNI includes, among other things, to whom,
where, and when a customer places a call, as well as the types of
service offerings to which the customer subscribes and the extent to
which the service is used.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 05/28/96 61 FR 26483
Public Notice 02/25/97 62 FR 8414
Second R&O and FNPRM 04/24/98 63 FR 20364
Order on Recon 10/01/99 64 FR 53242
Final Rule, Announcement of
Effective Date 01/26/01 66 FR 7865
Clarification Order & Second
NPRM 09/07/01 66 FR 50140
Third R&O and Third FNPRM 09/20/02 67 FR 59205
NPRM 03/15/06 71 FR 13317
NPRM 06/08/07 72 FR 31782
Final Rule, Announcement of
Effective Date 06/08/07 72 FR 31948
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Melissa Kirkel, Attorney-Advisor, WCB, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7958
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG43
_______________________________________________________________________
537. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LOCAL COMPETITION PROVISIONS OF THE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151 to 155; 47 USC 157; 47 USC 201 to 205; 47
USC 207 to 209; 47 USC 218
Abstract: On August 8, 1996, the Commission adopted the Local
Competition Second Report and Order (FCC 96-333), implementing the
dialing parity, nondiscriminatory access, network disclosure, and
numbering administration provisions of the Telecommunications Act of
1996. On July 19, 1999, the Commission released the First Order on
Reconsideration (FCC 99-170), denying the petition for reconsideration
of the Local Competition Second Report and Order filed by Beehive
Telephone Company, Inc., which related to numbering admininstration.
On September 9, 1999, the Commission released the Second Order on
Reconsideration (FCC 99-227), resolving petitions for reconsideration
of rules adopted in the Local Competition Second Report and Order to
implement the requirement of 47 U.S.C. section 251(b)(3) that LECs
provide non-discriminatory access to directory assistance, directory
listing and operator services. At the same time, the Commission
released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) (also FCC 99-227)
seeking comment on issues related to developments in, and the
convergence of, directory publishing and directory assistance.
On October 21, 1999, the Commission released the Third Order on
Reconsideration (FCC 99-243), resolving the remaining petitions for
reconsideration regarding numbering administration under 47 U.S.C.
section 251(e)(1). On January 29, 2002, the Commission released an
Order on Reconsideration (FCC02-11)dismissing petitions for
reconsideration or clarification of the Local Competition Second Report
and Order regarding dialing parity under 47 U.S.C. section 251(b)(3)
and network disclosure under 47 U.S.C. section 251(c)(5).
On January 23, 2001, the Commission released a First Report and Order
(FCC 01-27) resolving issues raised in the September 9, 1999 NPRM and
concluding, among other things, that competing directory assistance
(DA) providers that are certified as competitive local exchange
carriers (competitive LECs), are agents of competitive LECs, or that
offer call completion services are entitled to nondiscriminatory access
to LEC local DA databases.
On January 9, 2002, the Commission released the Directory Assistance
NPRM (FCC 01-384), in which the Commission solicited comment on whether
there is sufficient competition in the retail DA market, and if not,
[[Page 71496]]
what if any action the Commission should take to promote such
competition. The Commission sought specific comment on whether
alternative dialing methods would promote competition. Proposed methods
include: (1) presubscription to 411; (2) utilizing national 555
numbers; (3) utilizing carrier access codes (1010 numbers); and (4)
utilizing 411XX numbers. The Commission also sought comment on whether
the 411 dialing code should be eliminated. This proceeding is pending
before the Commission.
On May 3, 2005, the Commission released an Order on Reconsideration
(FCC 05-93) resolving petitions for reconsideration of the Second Order
on Reconsideration and the First Report and Order. The Commission
clarified its rules regarding the use of DA data obtained pursuant to
section 251(b)(3) of the Act, and denied BellSouth and SBC's joint
petition for reconsideration which sought authority to place
contractual restrictions on competing DA providers' use of DA
information. The Commission reaffirmed that LECs are required to
provide nondiscriminatory access to their entire local DA database
including local DA data acquired from third parties. The Commission
also accepted Qwest's request to withdraw its petition for
reconsideration of the First Report and Order, and resolved SBC's
petition for reconsideration of the Second Order on Reconsideration.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 04/25/96 61 FR 18311
NPRM Comment Period End 06/03/96
Order 09/06/96 61 FR 47284
NPRM 09/27/99 64 FR 51949
Second Order on Recon 09/27/99 64 FR 51910
Third Order on Recon 11/18/99 64 FR 62983
First R&O 02/21/01 66 FR 10965
NPRM 02/14/02 67 FR 6902
Order on Recon 08/17/05 70 FR 48290
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Rodney McDonald, Attorney-Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7513
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AG50
_______________________________________________________________________
538. LOCAL TELEPHONE NETWORKS THAT LECS MUST MAKE AVAILABLE TO
COMPETITORS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 251
Abstract: This revises the rules applicable to incumbent local exchange
carriers (LECs) to permit competitive carriers to access portions of
the incumbent LECs' networks on an unbundled basis. Unbundling allows
competitors to lease portions of the incumbent LECs' network to provide
telecommunications services. These rule changes are intended to remove
uncertainty regarding the incumbent LECs' unbundling obligations under
the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and are expected to accelerate the
development of local exchange competition.
On December 20, 2001, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to comprehensively consider the appropriate changes, if any,
to its unbundling policies in light of market developments and
technological advances. 67 FR 1947.
On May 29, 2002, the Commission extended the reply comment date of the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to July 17, 2002, to allow all interested
parties to incorporate their review and analysis of USTA v. FCC, 290
F.3d 415 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
On August 21, 2003, the Commission issued a Report and Order, Order on
Remand, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, in which the
Commission adopted new unbundling requirements. 68 FR 52276.
In addition, the Commission initiated a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
regarding whether the Commission should modify the so-called pick-and-
choose rule that permits requesting carriers to opt into individual
portions of interconnection agreements without accepting all the terms
and conditions of such agreements. 68 FR 52307.
On September 17, 2003, the Commission issued an Errata correcting the
Report and Order and Order on Remand. On October 9, 2003, the
Commission issued a Report seeking comment on ten petitions for
clarification and/or reconsideration of the Report and Order and Order
on Remand released on August 21, 2003. 68 FR 60391. By Order, the
Commission denied a request to extend the comment period for petitions
for clarification and/or reconsideration.On March 2, 2004, the
Commission's August 21, 2003 Report and Order and Order on Remand was
affirmed in part and vacated and remanded in part. USTA v. FCC, 359
F.3d 554 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
On July 13, 2004, the Commission's Second Report and Order concluded
the rulemaking proceeding initiated regarding the so-called pick-and-
choose rule and determined that an all-or-nothing rule for opting into
other interconnection agreements will better promote increased give and
take negotiations. 69 FR 43762.
On August 9, 2004, the Commission released an Order on Reconsideration
addressing in part two petitions for reconsideration of the
Commission's fiber-to-the-premises unbundling rules. 69 FR 54589. The
Commission clarified in this Order on Reconsideration the applicability
of the fiber-to-the-premises rules in multi-dwelling unit buildings.
On August 20, 2004, the Commission issued an Interim Order and Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking establishing a new rulemaking proceeding to
determine incumbent LEC unbundling obligations as well as establishing
interim requirements to govern carrier relationships until the
Commission concludes its rulemaking process. 69 FR 55111, 55128.
On October 18, 2004, the Commission released and Order on
Reconsideration concluding that fiber-to-the-curb (FTTC) loops shall be
subject to the same unbundling framework that the Commission
established for fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) loops. 69 FR 77950.
On February 4, 2005, the Commission released an Order on Remand, 70 FR
8940, responding to the D.C. Circuit's remand of certain parts of the
Triennial Review Order, including several aspects of the impairment
standard as well as new determinations regarding unbundling
requirements for local circuit switching, high-capacity loops, and
dedicated transport. Specifically, the Commission determined that
incumbent LECs have no obligation to unbundle local circuit switching
and adopted a 12-month plan to transition existing customers of
unbundled switching to other arrangements. Regarding high-capacity
loops, the
[[Page 71497]]
Commission determined that competing carriers are not impaired (thus,
are not entitled to access as UNEs) dark fiber loop circuits. Competing
carriers are, however, impaired without access to DS1 and DS3 loops,
except in wire centers that meet specific business lines and fiber-
based collocation thresholds. Similarly, with respect to dedicated
transport, the Commission determined that competing carriers are
impaired without access to DS1, DS3 and dark fiber transport, except on
routes connecting a pair of wire centers, each containing a specified
number of business lines or a specified number of fiber-based
collocators.
On March 14, 2005, the Commission's Wireline Competition Bureau issued
an order denying a petition filed by Verizon seeking a stay of the
Commission's rule alowing competitive LECs to ``convert'' tariffed
incumbent LEC special access arrangements to unbundled network element
(UNE) arrangements if the competitive LEC is eligible to order the
UNE(s) at issue.
On April 25, 2005 and May 25, 2005, the Commission issued Public
Notices establishing comment periods in response to petitions for
reconsideration of the Commission's Order on Remand (Triennial Review
Order).
On June 16, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit upheld the Commission's Order on Remand, 70 FR
8940.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
Second FNPRM 04/26/99 64 FR 20238
Fourth FNPRM 01/14/00 65 FR 2367
Errata Third R&O and Fourth
FNPRM 01/18/00 65 FR 2542
Second Errata Third R&O and
Fourth FNPRM 01/18/00 65 FR 2542
Supplemental Order 01/18/00 65 FR 2542
Third R&O 01/18/00 65 FR 2542
Correction 04/11/00 65 FR 19334
Supplemental Order Clarification06/20/00 65 FR 38214
Public Notice 02/01/01 66 FR 8555
Public Notice 03/05/01 66 FR 18279
Public Notice 04/10/01
Public Notice 04/23/01
Public Notice 05/14/01
NPRM 01/15/02 67 FR 1947
Public Notice 05/29/02
Public Notice 08/01/02
Public Notice 08/13/02
NPRM 08/21/03 68 FR 52276
R&O and Order on Remand 08/21/03 68 FR 52276
Errata 09/17/03
Report 10/09/03 68 FR 60391
Order 10/28/03
Order 01/09/04
Public Notice 01/09/04
Public Notice 02/18/04
Order 07/08/04
Second R&O 07/08/04 69 FR 43762
Order on Recon 08/09/04 69 FR 54589
Interim Order 08/20/04 69 FR 55111
NPRM 08/20/04 69 FR 55128
Public Notice 09/10/04
Public Notice 09/13/04
Public Notice 10/20/04
Order on Recon 12/29/04 69 FR 77950
Order on Remand 02/04/04
Public Notice 04/25/05 70 FR 29313
Public Notice 05/25/05 70 FR 34765
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Tim Stelzig, Associate Chief, Competition Policy
Division, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition
Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0942
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH44
_______________________________________________________________________
539. 2000 BIENNIAL REGULATORY REVIEW--TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE QUALITY
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 154(i) and 154(j); 47 USC 201(b); 47 USC
303(r); 47 USC 403
Abstract: This NPRM proposes to eliminate our current service quality
reports (ARMIS Report 43-05 and 43-06) and replace them with a more
consumer-oriented report. The NPRM proposes to reduce the reporting
categories from more than 30 to 6, and addresses the needs of carriers,
consumers, state public utility commissions, and other interested
parties.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 12/04/00 65 FR 75657
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Alex Johns, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1167
Fax: 202 418-1413
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH72
_______________________________________________________________________
540. ACCESS CHARGE REFORM AND UNIVERSAL SERVICE REFORM
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i) and 154(j); 47 USC 201 to
205; 47 USC 254; 47 USC 403
Abstract: On October 11, 2001, the Commission adopted an Order
reforming the interstate access charge and universal service support
system for rate-of-return incumbent carriers. The Order adopts three
principal reforms. First, the Order modifies the interstate access rate
structure for small carriers to align it more closely with the manner
in which costs are incurred. Second, the Order removes implicit support
for universal service from the rate structure and replaces it with
explicit, portable support. Third, the Order permits small carriers to
continue to set rates based on the authorized rate of return of 11.25
percent. The Order became effective on January 1, 2002, and the support
mechanism established by the Order was implemented beginning July 1,
2002.
The Commission also adopted a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(FNPRM) seeking additional comment on proposals for incentive
regulation, increased pricing flexibility for rate-of-return carriers,
and proposed changes to the Commission's ``all-or-nothing'' rule.
Comments on the FNPRM were due on February 14, 2002, and reply comments
on March 18, 2002.
On February 12, 2004, the Commission adopted a Second Report and Order
resolving several issues on which the Commission sought comment in the
FNPRM. First, the Commission modified the ``all-or-nothing'' rule to
permit rate-of-return carriers to bring recently acquired price cap
lines back to rate-of-return regulation. Second, the Commission granted
rate-of-return carriers the authority immediately to provide
geographically deaveraged transport and special access rates, subject
to certain limitations. Third, the Commission merged Long Term Support
(LTS) with Interstate Common Line Support (ICLS).
The Commission also adopted a Second FNPRM seeking comment on two
specific plans that propose establishing
[[Page 71498]]
optional alternative regulation mechanisms for rate-of-return carriers.
In conjunction with the consideration of those alternative regulation
proposals, the Commission sought comment on modification that would
permit a rate-of-return carrier to adopt an alternative regulation plan
for some study areas, while retaining rate-of-return regulation for
other of its study areas. Comments on the Second FNPRM were due on
April 23, 2004, and May 10, 2004.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 01/25/01 66 FR 7725
FNPRM 11/30/01 66 FR 59761
R&O 11/30/01 66 FR 59719
Second FNPRM 03/23/04 69 FR 13794
Order 05/06/04 69 FR 25325
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Douglas Slotten, Attorney-Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1572
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH74
_______________________________________________________________________
541. NUMBERING RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154; 47 USC 201 et seq; 47 USC
251(e)
Abstract: In 1999, the Commission released the Numbering Resource
Optimization Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Notice) in CC Docket 99-
200. The Notice examined and sought comment on several administrative
and technical measures aimed at improving the efficiency with which
telecommunications numbering resources are used and allocated. It
incorporated input from the North American Numbering Council (NANC), a
Federal advisory committee, which advises the Commission on issues
related to number administration.In the Numbering Resource Optimization
First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NRO
First Report and Order), released on March 31, 2000, the Commission
adopted a mandatory utilization data reporting requirement, a uniform
set of categories of numbers for which carriers must report their
utilization, and a utilization threshold framework to increase carrier
accountability and incentives to use numbers efficiently. In addition,
the Commission adopted a single system for allocating numbers in blocks
of one thousand, rather than ten thousand, wherever possible, and
established a plan for national rollout of thousands-block number
pooling. The Commission also adopted numbering resource reclamation
requirements to ensure that unused numbers are returned to the North
American Numbering Plan (NANP) inventory for assignment to other
carriers. Also, to encourage better management of numbering resources,
carriers are required, to the extent possible, to first assign
numbering resources within thousands blocks (a form of sequential
numbering).
In the NRO Second Report and Order, the Commission adopted a measure
that requires all carriers to use at least 60 percent of their
numbering resources before they may get additional numbers in a
particular area. That 60 percent utilization threshold increases to 75
percent over the next three years. The Commission also established a
five-year term for the national Pooling Administrator and an auditing
program to verify carrier compliance with the Commission's rules.
Furthermore, the Commission addressed several issues raised in the
Notice, concerning area code relief. Specifically, the Commission
declined to amend the existing Federal rules for area code relief or
specify any new federal guidelines for the implementation of area code
relief. The Commission also declined to state a preference for either
all-services overlays or geographic splits as a method of area code
relief. Regarding mandatory nationwide ten-digit dialing, the
Commission declined to adopt this measure at the present time.
Furthermore, the Commission declined to mandate nationwide expansion of
the ``D digit'' (the ``N'' of an NXX or central office code) to include
0 or 1, or to grant state commissions the authority to implement the
expansion of the D digit as a numbering resource optimization measure
at the present time.
In the NRO Third Report and Order, the Commission addressed national
thousands-block number pooling administration issues, including
declining to alter the implementation date for covered CMRS carriers to
participate in pooling. The Commission also addressed Federal cost
recovery for national thousands-block number pooling, and continued to
require States to establish cost recovery mechanisms for costs incurred
by carriers participating in pooling trials. The Commission reaffirmed
the Months-to-Exhaust (MTE) requirement for carriers. The Commission
declined to lower the utilization threshold established in the Second
Report and Order, and declined to exempt pooling carriers from the
utilization threshold. The Commission also established a safety valve
mechanism to allow carriers that do not meet the utilization threshold
in a given rate center to obtain additional numbering resources.
In the NRO Third Report and Order, the Commission lifted the ban on
technology-specific overlays (TSOs), and delegated authority to the
Common Carrier Bureau, in consultation with the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, to resolve any such petitions. Furthermore,
the Commission found that carriers who violate our numbering
requirements, or fail to cooperate with an auditor conducting either a
``for cause'' or random audit, should be denied numbering resources in
certain instances. The Commission also reaffirmed the 180-day
reservation period, declined to impose fees to extend the reservation
period, and found that State commissions should be allowed password-
protected access to the NANPA database for data pertaining to NPAs
located within their State.
The measures adopted in the NRO orders will allow the Commission to
monitor more closely the way numbering resources are used within the
NANP, and will promote more efficient allocation and use of NANP
resources by tying a carrier's ability to obtain numbering resources
more closely to its actual need for numbers to serve its customers.
These measures are designed to create national standards to optimize
the use of numbering resources by: (1) Minimizing the negative impact
on consumers of premature area code exhausts; (2) ensuring sufficient
access to numbering resources for all service providers to enter into
or to compete in telecommunications markets; (3) avoiding premature
exhaust of the NANP; (4) extending the life of the NANP; (5) imposing
the least societal cost possible, and ensuring competitive neutrality,
while obtaining the highest benefit; (6) ensuring that no class of
carrier or consumer is unduly favored
[[Page 71499]]
or disfavored by the Commission's optimization efforts; and (7)
minimizing the incentives for carriers to build and carry excessively
large inventories of numbers.
In NRO Third Order on Recon in CC Docket No. 99-200, Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 99-200 and Second
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No, 95-116, the
Commission reconsidered its findings in the NRO Third Report and Order
regarding the local Number portability (LNP) and thousands-block number
pooling requirements for carriers in the top 100 Metropolitan
Statistical areas (MSAs). Specifically, the Commission reversed its
clarification that those requirements extend to all carriers in the
largest 100 MSAs, regardless of whether they have received a request
from another carrier to provide LNP. The Commission also sought comment
on whether the Commission should again extend the LNP requirements to
all carriers in the largest 100 MSAs, regardless of whether they
receive a request to provide LNP. The Commission also sought comment on
whether all carriers in the top 100 MSAs should be required to
participate in thousands-block number pooling, regardless of whether
they are required to be LNP capable. In addition, the Commission sought
comment on whether all MSAs included in Combined Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (CMSAs) on the Census Bureau's list of the largest
100 MSAs should be included on the Commission's list of the top 100
MSAs.
In the NRO Fourth Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, the Commission reaffirmed that carriers must deploy LNP in
switches within the 100 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)
for which another carrier has made a specific request for the provision
of LNP. The Commission delegated the authority to state commissions to
require carriers operating within the largest 100 MSAs that have not
received a specific request for LNP from another carrier to provide
LNP, under certain circumstances and on a case-by-case basis. The
Commission concluded that all carriers, except those specifically
exempted, are required to participate in thousands-block number pooling
in accordance with the national rollout schedule, regardless of whether
they are required to provide LNP, including commercial mobile radio
service (CMRS) providers that were required to deploy LNP as of
November 24, 2003. The Commission specifically exempted from the
pooling requirement rural telephone companies and Tier III CMRS
providers that have not received a request to provide LNP. The
Commission also exempted from the pooling requirement carriers that are
the only service provider receiving numbering resources in a given rate
center. Additionally, the Commission sought further comment on whether
these exemptions should be expanded to include carriers where there are
only two service providers receiving numbering resources in the rate
center. Finally, the Commission reaffirmed that the 100 largest MSAs
identified in the 1990 U.S. Census reports as well as those areas
included on any subsequent U.S. Census report of the 100 largest MSAs.
In the NRO Order and Fifth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the
Commission granted petitions for delegated authority to implement
mandatory thousands-block pooling filed by the Public Service
Commission of West Virginia, the Nebraska Public Service Commission,
the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, the Michigan Public Service
Commission, and the Missouri Public Service Commission. In granting
these petitions, the Commission permitted these states to optimize
numbering resources and further extend the life of the specific
numbering plan areas. In the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the
Commission sought comment on whether it should delegate authority to
all states to implement mandatory thousands-block number pooling
consistent with the parameters set forth in the NRO Order.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 06/17/99 64 FR 32471
R&O and FNPRM 06/16/00 65 FR 37703
Second R&O and Second FNPRM 02/08/01 66 FR 9528
Third R&O and Second Order on
Recon 02/12/02 67 FR 643
Third O on Recon & Third FNPRM 04/05/02 67 FR 16347
Fourth R&O and Fourth NPRM 07/21/03 68 FR 43003
Order & Fifth FNPRM 03/15/06 71 FR 13393
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Marilyn Jones, Attorney, Federal Communications
Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2357
Fax: 202 418-2345
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AH80
_______________________________________________________________________
542. NATIONAL EXCHANGE CARRIER ASSOCIATION PETITION
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151 and 152; 47 USC 201 and 202; . . .
Abstract: In a notice of proposed rulemaking released on July 19, 2004,
the Commission initiated a rulemaking proceeding to examine the proper
number of end user common line charges (commonly referred to as
subscriber line charges or SLCs) that carriers may assess upon
customers that obtain derived channel T-1 service where the customer
provides the terminating channelization equipment and upon customers
that obtain Primary Rate Interface (PRI) Integrated Service Digital
Network (ISDN) service.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/13/04 69 FR 50141
NPRM Comment Period End 11/12/04
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Douglas Slotten, Attorney-Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1572
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI47
_______________________________________________________________________
543. IP-ENABLED SERVICES
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151 and 152; . . .
Abstract: The notice seeks comment on ways in which the Commission
might categorize IP-enabled services for purposes of evaluating the
need for applying any particular regulatory requirements. It poses
questions regarding the proper allocation of jurisdiction over each
category of IP-enabled service. The notice then requests comment on
whether the services comprising each category
[[Page 71500]]
constitute ``telecommunications services'' or ``information services''
under the definitions set forth in the Act. Finally, noting the
Commission's statutory forbearance authority and title I ancillary
jurisdiction, the notice describes a number of central regulatory
requirements (including, for example, those relating to access charges,
universal service, E911, and disability accessibility), and asks which,
if any, should apply to each category of IP-enabled services.
On June 16, 2005, the Commission published in the Federal Register
notice that public information collections set forth in the First
Report and Order were being submitted for review to the office of
management and budget.
On July 27, 2005, the Commission published in the Federal Register
notice that the information collection requirements adopted in the
First Report and Order were approved in OMB No. 3060-1085 and would
become effective on July 29, 2005.
On August 31, 2005, the Commission published in the Federal Register
notice of the comment cycle for three Petitions for Reconsideration
and/or Clarification of the First Report and Order.On July 10, 2006,
the Commission published in the Federal Register notice that it had
adopted on June 21, 2006, rules that make interim modifications to the
existing approach for assessing contributions to the Federal universal
service fund (USF or Fund) in order to provide stability while the
Commission continues to examine more fundamental reform.
On June 8, 2007, the Commission published in the Federal Register
notice that it had adopted on April 2, 2007, an item strengthening the
Commission's rules to protect the privacy of customer proprietary
network information (CPNI) that is collected and held by providers of
communications services, and a further notice of proposed rulemaking
seeking comment on what steps the Commission should take, if any, to
secure further the privacy of customer information.
On August 6, 2007, the Commission published in the Federal Register
notice that it had adopted on May 31, 2007, and item extending the
disability access requirements that currently apply to
telecommunications service providers and equipment manufacturers under
section 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to providers
of ``interconnected voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services,'' as
defined by the Commission, and to manufacturers of specially designed
equipment used to provide those services. In addition, the Commission
extended the Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) requirements
contained in its regulations to interconnected VoIP providers.
On August 7, 2007, the Commission published in the Federal Register a
notice that a petition for reconsideration of the CPNI order described
above had been filed.
On August 16, 2007, the Commission published in the Federal Register
notice that it had adopted on August 2, 2007, an item amending the
Commission's Schedule of Regulatory Fees by, inter alia, incorporating
regulatory fee payment obligations for interconnected VoIP service
providers, which shall become effective November 15, 2007, which is 90
days from date of notification to Congress.
On November 1, 2007, the Commission gave notice that it granted in
part, denied in part, and sought comment on petitions filed by the
Voice on the Net Coalition, the United States Telecom Association, and
Hamilton Telephone Company seeking a stay or waiver of certain aspects
of the Commission's VoIP Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) Order
(72 FR 61813; 72 FR 61882).
On December 13,2007, the Commission announced the effective date of its
revised CPNI rules (72 FR 70808).
On December 6, 2007, OMB approved the public information collection
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for the Commission's
CPNI rules (72 FR 72358).
On February 21, 2008, the Commission published in the Federal Register
notice that the Commission adopted rules extending local number
portability obligations and numbering administration support
obligations to interconnected VoIP services. The Commission also
explained it had responded to the District of Columbia Circuit Court of
Appeals stay of the Commission's Intermodal Number Portability Order by
publishing a Final Regulatory Flexibility Act (73 FR 9463; R&O 02/21/
2008).
On February 21, 2008, the Commission published in the Federal Register
notice that it sought comment on other changes to its LNP and numbering
related rules, including whether to extend such rules to interconnected
VoIP providers (73 FR 9507).
On August 6, 2007, the Commission published in the Federal Register
notice that it had extended Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS)
regulations to interconnected VoIP providers and extended certain
disability access requirements to interconnected VoIP providers and to
manufacturers of specially designed equipment used to provide such
service (72 FR 43546).
On May 15, 2008, the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau published in the Federal Register notice that it had granted
interconnected VoIP providers an extension of time to route 711-dialed
calls to an appropriate telecommunications relay service (TRS) center
in certain circumstances (73 FR 28057).
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 03/29/04 69 FR 16193
NPRM Comment Period End 07/14/04
First R&O 06/03/05 70 FR 37273
Public Notice 06/16/05 70 FR 37403
First R&O Effective 07/29/05 70 FR 43323
Public Notice 08/31/05 70 FR 51815
R&O 07/10/06 71 FR 38781
R&O and FNPRM 06/08/07 72 FR 31948
FNPRM Comment Period End 07/09/07 72 FR 31782
R&O 08/06/07 72 FR 43546
Public Notice 08/07/07 72 FR 44136
R&O 08/16/07 72 FR 45908
Public Notice 11/01/07 72 FR 61813
Public Notice 11/01/07 72 FR 61882
Public Notice 12/13/07 72 FR 70808
Public Notice 12/20/07 72 FR 72358
R&O 02/21/08 73 FR 9463
NPRM 02/21/08 73 FR 9507
Order 05/15/08 73 FR 28057
Order 05/15/08 73 FR 28057
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Tim Stelzig, Associate Chief, Competition Policy
Division, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition
Bureau, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-0942
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI48
[[Page 71501]]
_______________________________________________________________________
544. CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE BROADBAND ERA
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151 to 154; 47 USC 160; 47 USC 201 to 205; 47
USC 214; 47 USC 222; 47 USC 225; 47 USC 251 and 252; 47 USC 254 to 256;
47 USC 258; 47 USC 303(R)
Abstract: The Federal Communications Commission initiated this
rulemaking in order to develop a framework that ensures that, as the
telecommunications industry shifts from narrowband to broadband
services, consumer protection needs are met by all providers of
broadband Internet access service, regardless of the underlying
technology providers use to offer the service. The Commission sought
comment on whether adopting regulations, pursuant to its ancillary
jurisdiction under title I of the Communications Act, to address
consumer privacy, unauthorized changes to service, truth-in-billing,
network outage reporting, discontinuance of service, rate averaging,
and enforcement concerns, would be desirable and necessary as a matter
of public policy. The Commission also sought comment on whether it
should instead rely on market forces to address some or all of these
areas of potential concern. The rulemaking also explores whether there
are other areas of consumer protection related to wireline broadband
Internet access service for which the Commission should adopt
regulations pursuant to its ancillary jurisdiction.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 10/17/05 70 FR 60259
NPRM Comment Period End 03/01/06
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: William Kehoe, Senior Counsel for Convergence, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1580
Fax: 202 418-1413
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AI73
_______________________________________________________________________
545. ESTABLISHING JUST AND REASONABLE RATES FOR LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS
(WC DOCKET NO. 07-135)
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
Abstract: The Federal Communications Commission (Commission) is
examining whether its existing rules governing the setting of tariffed
rates by local exchange carriers (LECs) provide incentives and
opportunities for carriers to increase access demand endogenously with
the result that the tariff rates are no longer just and reasonable. The
Commission tentatively concluded that it must revise its tariff rules
so that it can be confident that tariffed rates remain just and
reasonable even if a carrier experiences or induces significant
increases in access demand. The Commission seeks comment on the types
of activities that are causing the increases in interstate access
demand and the effects of such demand increases on the cost structures
of LECs. The Commission also seeks comment on several means of ensuring
just and reasonable rates going forward. The NPRM invites comment on
potential traffic stimulation by rate-of-return LECs, price cap LECs,
and competitive LECs, as well as other forms of intercarrier traffic
stimulation. Comments were received on December 17, 2007, and reply
comments were received on January 16, 2008.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/15/07 72 FR 64179
NPRM Comment Period End 12/17/07
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Douglas Slotten, Attorney-Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-1572
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AJ02
_______________________________________________________________________
546. JURISDICTIONAL SEPARATIONS
Legal Authority: 47 USC 151; 47 USC 154(i) and 154(j); 47 USC 205; 47
USC 221(c); 47 USC 254; 47 USC 403; 47 USC 410
Abstract: Jurisdictional separations is the process, pursuant to part
36 of the Commission's rules, by which incumbent local exchange
carriers apportion regulated costs between the intrastate and
interstate jurisdictions. In 1997, the Commission initiated a
proceeding seeking comment on the extent to which legislative changes,
technological changes, and market changes warrant comprehensive reform
of the separations process. In 2001, the Commission adopted the
Federal-State Joint Board on Jurisdictional Separations' recommendation
to impose an interim freeze of the part 36 category relationships and
jurisdictional cost allocation factors for a period of five years,
pending comprehensive reform of the part 36 separations rules. In 2006,
the Commission adopted an Order and Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, which extended the separations freeze for a period of three
years and sought comment on comprehensive reform.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 11/05/97 62 FR 59842
NPRM Comment Period End 12/10/97
Order 06/21/01 66 FR 33202
Order and FNPRM 05/26/06 71 FR 29882
Order and FNPRM Comment Period
End 08/22/06
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: Ted Burmeister, Federal Communications Commission, 445
12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-7389
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AJ06
_______________________________________________________________________
547. IMPLEMENTATION OF NET 911 IMPROVEMENT ACT
Legal Authority: PL 110-283
Abstract: On July 23, 2008, the New and Emerging Technologies Act was
enacted.
On August 25, 2008, the Commission released an NPRM seeking comment on
implementing the NET 911 Improvement Act.
Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________
Action Date FR Cite
________________________________________________________________________
NPRM 08/28/08 73 FR 50741
[[Page 71502]]
NPRM Comment Period End 09/09/08
Next Action Undetermined
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes
Agency Contact: R. Matthew Warner, Attorney Advisor, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 202 418-2419
Email: [email protected]
RIN: 3060-AJ09
[FR Doc. E8-21195 Filed 11-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F