[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1993] [Tuesday, May 4, 1993 (49), Para 49.11 Soap Box Derby] [Page 371] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov] Para. 49.11 soap box derby Mr. TRAFICANT moved to suspend the rules and agree to the following concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 82): Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS. The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds on July 17, 1993, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate. SEC. 2. CONDITIONS. The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event. SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT. For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event to be carried out under this resolution. SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be required to carry out the event under this resolution. The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. MAZZOLI, recognized Mr. TRAFICANT and Mr. DUNCAN, each for 20 minutes. After debate, The question being put, viva voce, Will the House suspend the rules and agree to said concurrent resolution? The SPEAKER pro tempore, Mr. MAZZOLI, announced that two-thirds of the Members present had voted in the affirmative. So, two-thirds of the Members present having voted in favor thereof, the rules were suspended and said concurrent resolution was agreed to. A motion to reconsider the vote whereby the rules were suspended and said concurrent resolution was agreed to was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table. Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said concurrent resolution.