Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

01-1077 - Cromer-Tyler v. Teitel


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
01-1077 - Cromer-Tyler v. Teitel
June 7, 2005
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 9 Motion to Dismiss filed by Edward R. Teitel; Denying 18 Supplemental Motion to Dismiss filed by Edward R. Teitel; Defendants are directed to file their Answers no later than 6/17/05; the parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the FRCP, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan; Pursuant to FRCP 26(f), a Report of Parties Planning Meeting containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not later than thirty days after the date of entry of the Memo. Opinion & Order. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/7/05. (Attachments: # (1) appeals checklist# (2) plra notice)(vmc, )
August 14, 2006
PDF | More
(THE PORTION OF THIS ORDER THAT GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANTS ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS RELATING TO THE EDWARD R. TEITEL, M.D., P.C. PROFIT SHARING PLAN AND DISMISSED THOSE CLAIMS IS VACATED PURSUANT TO 169 ORDER). MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER,as follows denying in part and granting in part 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Edward R. Teitel, 2) Should Plaintiff wish to pursue an appeal of the denial of her claim to the fund in the Edward R. Teitel, M.D., P.C. Money Purchase Pension Plan, she must pursue that appeal within 60 days of the date of this Order; The plan administrator shall make a determination on this appeal within 120 days of the date of this order; 3) The Clerk of the Court further is directed to close this matter for statistical purposes, however, the plaintiff shall have the right to seek to reopen this case within 30 days following the final determination by the plan administrator; 4) The parties are hereby ordered to file a jointly prepared report on the status of this case; The first such report shall be filed on 10/3/06, and the parties shall thereafter file ajointly prepared report on the first Tuesday of every month until such time as the parties jointly stipulate that this action can be dismissed as further set out; 5) The 9/5/06 pretrial and the 10/2/06 trial setting are hereby cancelled.. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/14/06. (Attachments: # (1) appeals checklist)(Term - PTl Conference 09/05/2006 Non-JT 10/02/2006)(vma, )(furn: yg hc kg) (vma, ). Modified on 11/7/2008 TO VACATE A PORTION OF THIS ORDER (cb, ).
September 11, 2007
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; the court will enter a written final judgment in favor of Plf and against Dfts. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/11/2007. (wcl, )
September 11, 2007
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 95 Motion for Attorney's Fees. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/11/2007. (wcl, )
September 11, 2007
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Plf's 94 Petition for Award of Attorney's Fee is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. As part of the judgment in this case Plf is awarded $57,585.52 in attorney's fees and $3,250.83 in costs. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/11/2007. (wcl, )
April 17, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER denying 154 Request to Proceed Without Posting Supersedeas Bond and Motion for Hearing; ORDER denying 138 Amended MOTION for Stay of Enforcement Proceedings Pending Appeal. Signed by Judge Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 4/17/2008. (wcl, )
May 5, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER granting 155 Motion to Compel; further ORDERED that dft shall file a response to the request for award of attorney's fees on or before 5/19/2008 and plf shall file a reply to dft's response on or before 6/2/2008. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 5/5/2008. (wcl, )