Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-367 - Duke v. Houston County, Alabama et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-367 - Duke v. Houston County, Alabama et al
March 10, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER: Plaintiff's 15 Motion to Dismiss the Houston County Sheriff's Department is GRANTED and all claims against the Houston County Sheriff's Deparmtent are DISMISSED. Nothing in this Order is intended to in any way effect Plaintiff's claims against any of the other defendants in this action. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/10/2006. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Appeals Checklist) (dmn)
July 12, 2006
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as follows: (1) Defendant McCallister's 24 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Duke's Amended Complaint is GRANTED in part to the extent that it seeks dismissal of this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and (2) All claims against Jason McCallister are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction and Jason McCallister is DISMISSED as a defendant. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 7/12/2006. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
March 31, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: 1) The Dfts 28 Motion to Dismiss Plf's Amended Complaint is GRANTED to the extent that it is directed to the claims brought pursuant to 42 USC 1983 and DENIED to the extent that it is directed to the claims brought pursuant to Alabama law; 2) All of Duke's claims against Houston County, Glover, and Seay pursuant to 42 USC 1983 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3) The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Duke's claims pursuant to Alabama law and such claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 4) A separate final judgment will be entered consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/31/2008. (wcl, )
March 31, 2008
PDF | More
FINAL JUDGMENT, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court as follows: (1) With respect to all federal claims in this action judgment is entered in favor of Dfts and against Plf, with Plf taking nothing by her claims; (2) Plf's remaining state-law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 USC 1367; (3) Costs are TAXED in favor of Dfts against Plf for which execution may issue; (4) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP and to close this file. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/31/2008. (Attachments: # (1) civil appeals checklist) (wcl, )