Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-630 - Young v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-630 - Young v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
March 31, 2017
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that Young's successive 2254 petition be dismissed under 28 USC 2244(b)(4) because Young has failed to satisfy the requirements of 28 USC 2244(b)(2)(B); Objections to R&R due by 4/14/2017. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/31/2017. (wcl, )
April 26, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation (Doc. 21) is ADOPTED; 2. Youngs successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas petition (Doc. 1) is DENIED for failure to satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2)(B); and 3. Youngs petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(4). A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/26/2017. (dmn, )